玉米第8染色体单片段代换系的构建与灰斑病抗性材料筛选

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.03.01

浙江农业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 383-389.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.03.01

玉米第8染色体单片段代换系的构建与灰斑病抗性材料筛选

杨梅, 胡小兰, 申涛, 谭康, 刘代铃, 邱红波^*()

贵州大学农学院,贵州贵阳 550025

收稿日期:2020-11-13 出版日期:2021-04-02 发布日期:2021-03-25
通讯作者: 邱红波
作者简介:*, 邱红波,E-mail: qhb001122@163.com
杨梅(1995—),女,贵州平塘人,硕士研究生,研究方向为分子遗传育种。E-mail: 2452627869@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(32060488);国家自然科学基金(31460384);贵州大学培育项目(黔科合平台人才〔2007〕5788-26);贵州大学博士基金启动项目(贵大人基合字〔2013〕27号)

Construction of single fragment substitution lines of maize 8th chromosome and sreening of resistant maize germplasm to gray leaf spot

YANG Mei, HU Xiaolan, SHEN Tao, TAN Kang, LIU Dailing, QIU Hongbo^*()

College of Agriculture, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China

Received:2020-11-13 Online:2021-04-02 Published:2021-03-25
Contact: QIU Hongbo

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以贵州省常用玉米自交系T32为供体,J51为受体,通过连续多代回交并结合分子标记辅助选择,获得了23个玉米第8染色体单片段代换系。采用自然接种法对该群体进行灰斑病抗性鉴定,并选用在两亲本间均具明显多态性差异的65对SSR标记进行代换系的跟踪检测,通过第8染色体上的29个SSR标记对代换系供体片段进行遗传结构分析。结果表明,23个染色体单片段代换系中供体代换的位点不同,代换片段长度为10.40~129.70 cM,平均长度为36.99 cM,导入片段总长850.67 cM,对第8染色体的覆盖率为80.80%。自然接种灰斑病菌后产生了抗、中抗、感、高感4种表型,其中H3系和H17系发病程度较低,2年的病级均值分别为2.85、2.90,表现为抗病。研究筛选出的2个抗性株系可作为后续研究材料,为玉米灰斑病抗性基因挖掘与抗病育种创建基础。

关键词: 玉米, 第8染色体, 染色体片段代换系, 灰斑病, 抗性鉴定

Abstract:

In this study, 23 single segment substitution lines of maize 8th chromosome were obtained by successive backcross and marker assisted selection with T32 and J51, the common inbred lines of maize in Guizhou, as donor and acceptor, respectively. Then, method of natural inoculation was used to identify the resistance to maize gray spot, and 65 pairs of SSR markers that located on the 8th chromosome with obvious polymorphic differences between two parents were used for the following detection of substitution lines. The genetic structure of donor fragments of the substitution lines was evaluated by 29 SSR markers on the 8th chromosome. The results showed that 23 chromosome single-segment substitution lines had different donor fragment sites and length of the substitution fragment was 10.40-129.70 cM, the average length was 36.99 cM, total length of the imported fragment was 850.67 cM, and coverage rate of the replacement fragments on 8th chromosomes was 80.80%. Disease-resistant result showed four kinds of phenotypes: resistant, moderately resistant, susceptible and highly susceptible. Among them, the line of H3 and H17 were identified as resistant, with the two years average disease grade of 2.85 and 2.90, respectively. Two resistant lines were screened out in this study, which could be used as follow-up research materials and lay a foundation for resistant maize breeding to gray leaf spot.

Key words: maize, chromosome 8, chromosome segment substitution line, gray spot disease, resistance identification

中图分类号:

S513

杨梅, 胡小兰, 申涛, 谭康, 刘代铃, 邱红波. 玉米第8染色体单片段代换系的构建与灰斑病抗性材料筛选[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(3): 383-389.

YANG Mei, HU Xiaolan, SHEN Tao, TAN Kang, LIU Dailing, QIU Hongbo. Construction of single fragment substitution lines of maize 8th chromosome and sreening of resistant maize germplasm to gray leaf spot[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(3): 383-389.

图/表 5

参考文献 21

[1]	曹国辉 . 玉米灰斑病及抗性研究[J]. 玉米科学, 2009,17(5):152-155.
	CAO G H . The research advance on resistance to grey leaf spot in maize[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2009,17(5):152-155. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	刘庆奎 . 玉米灰斑病致病菌鉴定及其遗传多样性研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2013.
	LIU Q K . Identification and genetic diversty of Cercospora species causing gray leaf spot in maize[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2013. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	赵立萍, 王晓鸣, 段灿星 , 等. 中国玉米灰斑病发生现状与未来扩散趋势分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015,48(18):3612-3626.
	ZHAO L P, WANG X M, DUAN C X , et al. Occurrence status and future spreading areas of maize gray leaf spot in China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015,48(18):3612-3626.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	宋军锋, 陈华, 田志强 , 等. 玉米灰斑病抗病QTL鉴定和效应分析[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2019,53(5):677-682.
	SONG J F, CHEN H, TIAN Z Q , et al. QTL identification and effect analysis of resistance to gray leaf spot in maize[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2019,53(5):677-682.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	段灿星, 董怀玉, 李晓 , 等. 玉米种质资源大规模多年多点多病害的自然发病抗性鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2020,46(8):1135-1145.
	DUAN C X, DONG H Y, LI X , et al. A large-scale screening of maize germplasm for resistance to multiple diseases in multi-plot demonstration for several years under natural condition[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020,46(8):1135-1145.
	( (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	董怀玉, 姜钰, 王丽娟 , 等. 玉米种质资源抗灰斑病鉴定与评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2005,6(4):441-443.
	DONG H Y, JIANG Y, WANG L J , et al. Evaluation on maize germplasm resources for resistance to gray leaf spot[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2005,6(4):441-443.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	吕香玲, 李新海, 陈阳 , 等. 玉米种质抗灰斑病鉴定与评价[J]. 玉米科学, 2011,19(6):125-128.
	LYU X L, LI X H, CHEN Y , et al. Evaluation and identification of resistance to gray leaf spot (GLS) in maize germplasm[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2011,19(6):125-128. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	谭静, 罗吉, 孙彩梅 , 等. 玉米灰斑病抗性种质与基因位点的研究进展[J]. 种子, 2019,38(8):57-60.
	TAN J, LUO J, SUN C M , et al. Research progress on resistant germplasm and gene locus to gray leaf spot of maize[J]. Seed, 2019,38(8):57-60.(in Chinese)
[9]	钟涛 . 玉米灰斑病和茎腐病抗病基因克隆及抗病机理研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2019.
	ZHONG T . Cloning and resistance mechanism of genes for gray leaf spot and stalk rot resistance in maize[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	LI Z K, FU B Y, GAO Y M , et al. Genome-wide introgression lines and their use in genetic and molecular dissection of complex phenotypes in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Plant Molecular Biology, 2005,59(1):33-52. DOI URL PMID
[11]	LIU S B, ZHOU R H, DONG Y C , et al. Development, utilization of introgression lines using a synthetic wheat as donor[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2006,112(7):1360-1373. DOI URL PMID
[12]	ESHED Y, ZAMIR D . An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL[J]. Genetics, 1995,141(3):1147-1162. URL PMID
[13]	KORFF M V, WANG H, LÉON J, et al. AB-QTL analysis in spring barley: II. Detection of favourable exotic alleles for agronomic traits introgressed from wild barley (H. vulgare ssp. spontaneum)[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2006,112(7):1221-1231. DOI URL PMID
[14]	杨雯竹 . 玉米抗灰斑病的QTL分析[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2016.
	YANG W Z . QTL analysis of resistance to gray leaf spot in maize[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou University, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	黄必华, 张晓梅, 肖卫华 , 等. 云南省德宏州玉米灰斑病发生规律及防治技术研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2009(4):80-82.
	HUANG B H, ZHANG X M, XIAO W H , et al. Occurrence and control techniques of gray leaf soot of maize in Yunnan Province[J]. Crops, 2009(4):80-82. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	SAGHAI-MAROOF M A, BIYASHEV R M, YANG G P , et al. Extraordinarily polymorphic microsatellite DNA in barley: species diversity, chromosomal locations, and population dynamics[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 1994,91(12):5466-5470.
[17]	王晓鸣, 石洁, 晋齐鸣 , 等. 玉米病虫害田间手册[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2010.
[18]	YOUNG N D, TANKSLEY S D . Restriction fragment length polymorphism maps and the concept of graphical genotypes[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1989,77(1):95-101. DOI URL PMID
[19]	吴雯雯, 欧杨虹, 张振良 , 等. 玉米自交系灰斑病抗性配合力及遗传分析[J]. 南方农业学报, 2016,47(8):1313-1317.
	WU W W, OU Y H, ZHANG Z L , et al. Analysis on combining ability and genetics of resistance to grey leaf spot of maize inbred lines[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2016,47(8):1313-1317. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	ZHANG Y, XU L, FAN X M , et al. QTL mapping of resistance to gray leaf spot in maize[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2012,125(8):1797-1808. DOI URL PMID
[21]	曹国辉 . 玉米抗灰斑病种质鉴定与QTL定位的初步研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2008.
	CAO G H . Preliminary studies on germplasm evaluation and QTL mapping for resistance to gray leaf spot in maize[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2008. (in Chinese with English abstract)

染色体片段代换 CSILs	病级Rating									抗性评价 Resistance
	2018年 2018 year				2019年2019 year				平均 Average
	勐嘎Mengga		江东Jiangdong		勐嘎Mengga		江东Jiangdong
	标准差s	变异范围 Range of variation	标准差s	变异范围 Range of variation	标准差s	变异范围 Range of variation	标准差s	变异范围 Range of variation
J51	0	9~9	0	9~9	0	9~9	0	9~9	9.00	HS
T32	0	1~1	0	1~1	0	1~1	0	1~1	1.00	HR
H1	1.00	5~7	1.34	5~7	0.98	5~7	0.98	5~7	5.90	MR
H2	1.00	7~9	1.33	5~9	0.92	7~9	0	9~9	8.30	HS
H3	1.08	1~5	0.80	1~3	1.50	1~3	1.40	1~7	2.85	R
H4	1.00	7~9	0.98	7~9	0.80	7~9	0.98	7~9	7.85	HS
H5	1.20	5~9	0.60	7~9	0.80	7~9	0.92	7~9	8.60	HS
H6	0.60	7~9	0.60	7~9	0.80	7~9	0.92	7~9	8.15	HS
H7	1.08	3~7	0.98	5~7	1.00	5~9	0.98	5~7	5.80	MR
H8	0.80	7~9	0	9~9	0	9~9	0.60	7~9	8.85	HS
H9	1.00	7~9	0.98	7~9	0.98	7~9	0.98	7~9	8.05	HS
H10	0.92	7~9	0	9~9	0.60	7~9	0.80	7~9	8.70	HS
H11	0.98	7~9	0.80	7~9	0.98	7~9	0.98	7~9	8.30	HS
H12	0	9~9	0.92	7~9	0.98	7~9	0.98	7~9	8.25	HS
H13	0.92	7~9	0.60	7~9	0.80	7~9	0.80	7~9	8.60	HS
H14	0.80	7~9	1.28	5~9	0.92	7~9	0.60	7~9	7.95	HS
H15	1.00	7~9	0.98	7~9	0.98	7~9	0.92	7~9	8.20	HS
H16	1.28	5~9	1.00	7~9	0.98	7~9	0.98	7~9	7.80	HS
H17	0.60	1~3	0.60	1~3	0	3~3	0	3~3	2.90	R
H18	0.60	7~9	0	7~7	1.20	5~9	0.98	5~7	6.75	S
H19	1.33	5~9	0.80	7~9	1.00	7~9	0.92	7~9	8.20	HS
H20	0.92	7~9	0.00	9~9	0.92	7~9	0.60	7~9	8.05	HS
H21	0.98	7~9	0.80	7~9	0.92	7~9	1.00	7~9	8.20	HS
H22	0.60	7~9	0.92	7~9	0.80	7~9	0.98	7~9	8.50	HS
H23	0.60	7~9	0.80	7~9	0.60	7~9	0.92	7~9	8.65	HS

染色体片段代换 CSILs	病级Rating									抗性评价 Resistance
	2018年 2018 year				2019年2019 year				平均 Average
	勐嘎Mengga		江东Jiangdong		勐嘎Mengga		江东Jiangdong
	标准差s	变异范围 Range of variation	标准差s	变异范围 Range of variation	标准差s	变异范围 Range of variation	标准差s	变异范围 Range of variation
J51	0	9~9	0	9~9	0	9~9	0	9~9	9.00	HS
T32	0	1~1	0	1~1	0	1~1	0	1~1	1.00	HR
H1	1.00	5~7	1.34	5~7	0.98	5~7	0.98	5~7	5.90	MR
H2	1.00	7~9	1.33	5~9	0.92	7~9	0	9~9	8.30	HS
H3	1.08	1~5	0.80	1~3	1.50	1~3	1.40	1~7	2.85	R
H4	1.00	7~9	0.98	7~9	0.80	7~9	0.98	7~9	7.85	HS
H5	1.20	5~9	0.60	7~9	0.80	7~9	0.92	7~9	8.60	HS
H6	0.60	7~9	0.60	7~9	0.80	7~9	0.92	7~9	8.15	HS
H7	1.08	3~7	0.98	5~7	1.00	5~9	0.98	5~7	5.80	MR
H8	0.80	7~9	0	9~9	0	9~9	0.60	7~9	8.85	HS
H9	1.00	7~9	0.98	7~9	0.98	7~9	0.98	7~9	8.05	HS
H10	0.92	7~9	0	9~9	0.60	7~9	0.80	7~9	8.70	HS
H11	0.98	7~9	0.80	7~9	0.98	7~9	0.98	7~9	8.30	HS
H12	0	9~9	0.92	7~9	0.98	7~9	0.98	7~9	8.25	HS
H13	0.92	7~9	0.60	7~9	0.80	7~9	0.80	7~9	8.60	HS
H14	0.80	7~9	1.28	5~9	0.92	7~9	0.60	7~9	7.95	HS
H15	1.00	7~9	0.98	7~9	0.98	7~9	0.92	7~9	8.20	HS
H16	1.28	5~9	1.00	7~9	0.98	7~9	0.98	7~9	7.80	HS
H17	0.60	1~3	0.60	1~3	0	3~3	0	3~3	2.90	R
H18	0.60	7~9	0	7~7	1.20	5~9	0.98	5~7	6.75	S
H19	1.33	5~9	0.80	7~9	1.00	7~9	0.92	7~9	8.20	HS
H20	0.92	7~9	0.00	9~9	0.92	7~9	0.60	7~9	8.05	HS
H21	0.98	7~9	0.80	7~9	0.92	7~9	1.00	7~9	8.20	HS
H22	0.60	7~9	0.92	7~9	0.80	7~9	0.98	7~9	8.50	HS
H23	0.60	7~9	0.80	7~9	0.60	7~9	0.92	7~9	8.65	HS

株系编号 Lines number	供体片段位点 Donor fragment site	最短长度 Minimum length/cM	最长长度 Maximum length/cM	估计长度 Estimated length/cM
H1	umc2356	0	63.20	31.60
H2	umc2356-bnlg1607-umc1607-umc266d-bnlg1828	93.90	165.50	129.70
H3	umc1034-csu329	1.87	62.40	32.13
H4	umc1487	0	67.99	33.00
H5	umc2354	0	39.90	19.95
H6	umc1130-umc2367	14.40	51.60	33.00
H7	umc2218	0	64.70	32.35
H8	umc226d	0	40.30	20.15
H9	umc1414	0	80.50	40.25
H10	umc2352a-bnlg1073-umc1304	0	21.30	10.65
H11	bnlg1828-umc1807	14.80	36.81	25.81
H12	bnlg1828	0	31.01	15.51
H13	bnlg2046	0	25.90	12.95
H14	umc2354-bnlg1863-bnlg1460-umc1302	44.20	62.58	53.39
H15	phi080	0	24.30	12.15
H16	bnlg1607-umc1607	21.60	77.73	49.67
H17	umc1034-csu329-bnlg1828-umc1807-umc2354	38.68	87.60	63.14
H18	umc1384	0	56.67	28.34
H19	bnlg1828-umc1807-umc1377-bnlg1460	29.68	88.00	58.84
H20	umc1139	0	26.80	13.40
H21	umc2367-bnlg2181-umc1889-umc1316	37.20	82.80	60.00
H22	umc1807-umc2354-bnlg1863-bnlg1828-umc1807-umc1377	54.60	84.38	69.49
H23	umc1377	0	10.40	5.20

株系编号 Lines number	供体片段位点 Donor fragment site	最短长度 Minimum length/cM	最长长度 Maximum length/cM	估计长度 Estimated length/cM
H1	umc2356	0	63.20	31.60
H2	umc2356-bnlg1607-umc1607-umc266d-bnlg1828	93.90	165.50	129.70
H3	umc1034-csu329	1.87	62.40	32.13
H4	umc1487	0	67.99	33.00
H5	umc2354	0	39.90	19.95
H6	umc1130-umc2367	14.40	51.60	33.00
H7	umc2218	0	64.70	32.35
H8	umc226d	0	40.30	20.15
H9	umc1414	0	80.50	40.25
H10	umc2352a-bnlg1073-umc1304	0	21.30	10.65
H11	bnlg1828-umc1807	14.80	36.81	25.81
H12	bnlg1828	0	31.01	15.51
H13	bnlg2046	0	25.90	12.95
H14	umc2354-bnlg1863-bnlg1460-umc1302	44.20	62.58	53.39
H15	phi080	0	24.30	12.15
H16	bnlg1607-umc1607	21.60	77.73	49.67
H17	umc1034-csu329-bnlg1828-umc1807-umc2354	38.68	87.60	63.14
H18	umc1384	0	56.67	28.34
H19	bnlg1828-umc1807-umc1377-bnlg1460	29.68	88.00	58.84
H20	umc1139	0	26.80	13.40
H21	umc2367-bnlg2181-umc1889-umc1316	37.20	82.80	60.00
H22	umc1807-umc2354-bnlg1863-bnlg1828-umc1807-umc1377	54.60	84.38	69.49
H23	umc1377	0	10.40	5.20

玉米第8染色体单片段代换系的构建与灰斑病抗性材料筛选

Construction of single fragment substitution lines of maize 8th chromosome and sreening of resistant maize germplasm to gray leaf spot

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 21

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	瞿展, 杨立桃. 转基因玉米TC1507质粒DNA标准物质的研制[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(3): 390-395.
[2]	杨乙未, 肖华, 陈浒, 肖聶佳, 郭城. 喀斯特地区不同玫瑰混农林模式的土壤螨类群落结构特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(1): 112-121.
[3]	刘根红, 薛银鑫, 张倩, 周佳瑞, 买小凤. 滴灌条件下不同耕深及秸秆还田量对玉米生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(1): 8-17.
[4]	常会庆, 徐富锦, 潘亚杰. 碳酸钙及其与壳聚糖联用对石灰性土壤铬污染的钝化效应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(9): 1665-1671.
[5]	郭延景, 肖海峰. 世界玉米主产国家和地区玉米补贴政策支持水平与结构特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(9): 1722-1731.
[6]	牛博, 李丽娜, 庞广昌, 鲁丁强. 植物根尖分生组织传感器的构建及其对尿素传感动力学研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(8): 1466-1474.
[7]	王长进, 徐运林, 程昕昕, 周毅, 余海兵. 甜玉米种子营养品质主要性状全基因组关联分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(3): 383-389.
[8]	赵星凯, 石海春, 余学杰, 杨殊, 赵长云, 夏伟, 柯永培. 十三份玉米新自交系的育种潜势分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(12): 2119-2127.
[9]	朱雷, 贾北平, 曹利, 徐静茹, 赵杰, 冯士彬, 李玉, 吴金节, 王希春. ZEA与DON单一及联合染毒致仔猪睾丸支持细胞凋亡的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(11): 1954-1962.
[10]	姜媛媛, 纪艺, 来勇敏, 陈笑芸, 徐俊锋, 徐晓丽, 马莲菊. 转Cry抗虫基因玉米对家蚕的安全性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(11): 2042-2049.
[11]	钟静, 谭芬, 张洪权, 熊校勤, 黄丽霞. 玉米XYLPs基因家族表达模式及其蛋白结构分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(10): 1741-1747.
[12]	陶晶, 邬奇峰, 石江, 李松昊, 葛江飞, 陈俊辉, 徐秋芳, 梁辰飞, 秦华. 间作与接种丛枝菌根真菌对新垦山地玉米产量和土壤肥力的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(1): 115-123.
[13]	岳高红, 潘彬荣, 刘永安, 梅喜雪, 许立奎, 张宗宸, 周志辉. 利用SSR分析浙南地区甜玉米自交系的遗传多样性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(7): 1029-1036.
[14]	方芳, 何序晨, 张志豪, 张勤, 关亚静, 胡晋, 胡伟民. 玉米自交系苗期对高温胁迫的响应机制及其抗逆性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(7): 1045-1056.
[15]	刘志, 贺正, 苗芳芳, 贾彪. 基于无人机的水肥一体化玉米出苗率估算方法与试验[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(6): 977-985.