浙江农业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 1808-1816.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.10.03
徐玥(), 胥雅馨, 黄兴军, 吴树, 陈国栋*(), 吴全忠, 翟云龙
收稿日期:
2020-12-01
出版日期:
2021-10-25
发布日期:
2021-11-02
通讯作者:
陈国栋
作者简介:
陈国栋,E-mail: cgdzky@163.com基金资助:
XU Yue(), XU Yaxin, HUANG Xingjun, WU Shu, CHEN Guodong*(), WU Quanzhong, ZHAI Yunlong
Received:
2020-12-01
Online:
2021-10-25
Published:
2021-11-02
Contact:
CHEN Guodong
摘要:
探讨不同根瘤菌接种方式的实施效果,以前期分离、鉴定、纯化的3株根瘤菌菌株为供试材料,选用南疆地区复播大豆绥农35为供试品种,比较根瘤菌拌种、做种肥、随水滴施等接种方式的效果,测定大豆结瘤数量、根瘤干重、植株地上部干物质积累分配、产量及其构成因素等指标,探讨接种方式和根瘤菌对复播大豆干物质积累及产量的影响。结果表明,3种接种方式均能促进大豆根系结瘤,其中,以SN7-2拌种、SMH12做种肥,SN7-2做种肥和T6随水滴施大豆根瘤菌结瘤效果最好;SN7-2拌种,SMH12做种肥,SN7-2做种肥,T6随水滴施能显著促进大豆干物质积累,SN7-2拌种或者SN7-2做种肥、T6随水滴施均促进干物质向生殖器官分配;不同接种方式通过增加主茎节数、单株荚数、单株粒数和百粒重提高大豆籽粒产量,SN7-2适合以拌种或做种肥的方式接种,T6适合随水滴施。
中图分类号:
徐玥, 胥雅馨, 黄兴军, 吴树, 陈国栋, 吴全忠, 翟云龙. 根瘤菌接种方式对复播大豆干物质积累与产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(10): 1808-1816.
XU Yue, XU Yaxin, HUANG Xingjun, WU Shu, CHEN Guodong, WU Quanzhong, ZHAI Yunlong. Effects of inoculation method of rhizobia on dry matter accumulation and yield of multiple soybean[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(10): 1808-1816.
图1 不同生育时期大豆单株结瘤数 同一生育期相同接种方式的柱上无相同小写字母表示差异显著。下同。
Fig.1 Nodule number of soybean at different growth stages Data on the bars marked without the same lowercase letter at the same growth stage with the same inoculation method indicated significant differences at P<0.05. The same as below.
接种方式 Inoculation method | 根瘤菌 Rhizobia | 四节期 V4 | 盛花期 R2 | 盛荚期 R4 | 鼓粒期 R6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
拌种Seed dressing | SMH12 | 0.006±0.001 cC | 0.016±0.002 dD | 0.191±0.001 cC | 0.443±0.016 cC |
T6 | 0.033±0.000 aA | 0.037±0.000 cC | 0.230±0.006 aA | 0.545±0.027 bB | |
SN7-2 | 0.023±0.003 bB | 0.099±0.008 aA | 0.216±0.006 bB | 1.610±0.008 aA | |
CK | 0.021±0.000 bB | 0.069±0.006 bB | 0.183±0.005 dC | 0.390±0.056 cC | |
种肥Seed manure | SMH12 | 0.045±0.001 aA | 0.034±0.003 cC | 0.187±0.004 bB | 0.601±0.011 bA |
T6 | 0.026±0.004 bB | 0.076±0.002 bB | 0.079±0.019 cC | 0.278±0.032 cB | |
SN7-2 | 0.040±0.003 aA | 0.097±0.007 aA | 0.266±0.009 aA | 0.657±0.005 aA | |
CK | 0.024±0.001 bB | 0.072±0.013 bB | 0.186±0.006 bB | 0.296±0.029 cB | |
滴施Drip irrigation | SMH12 | 0.016±0.002 cC | 0.138±0.006 abA | 0.209±0.004 cC | 0.372±0.026 cC |
T6 | 0.055±0.002 aA | 0.123±0.012 bAB | 0.311±0.015 aA | 0.753±0.019 aA | |
SN7-2 | 0.023±0.001 bB | 0.161±0.015 aA | 0.261±0.017 bB | 0.567±0.020 bB | |
CK | 0.022±0.001 bB | 0.072±0.024 cB | 0.189±0.006 dC | 0.358±0.029 cC |
表1 不同生育时期每株大豆根瘤干重
Table 1 Dry weight of nodule in soybean at different growth stages g
接种方式 Inoculation method | 根瘤菌 Rhizobia | 四节期 V4 | 盛花期 R2 | 盛荚期 R4 | 鼓粒期 R6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
拌种Seed dressing | SMH12 | 0.006±0.001 cC | 0.016±0.002 dD | 0.191±0.001 cC | 0.443±0.016 cC |
T6 | 0.033±0.000 aA | 0.037±0.000 cC | 0.230±0.006 aA | 0.545±0.027 bB | |
SN7-2 | 0.023±0.003 bB | 0.099±0.008 aA | 0.216±0.006 bB | 1.610±0.008 aA | |
CK | 0.021±0.000 bB | 0.069±0.006 bB | 0.183±0.005 dC | 0.390±0.056 cC | |
种肥Seed manure | SMH12 | 0.045±0.001 aA | 0.034±0.003 cC | 0.187±0.004 bB | 0.601±0.011 bA |
T6 | 0.026±0.004 bB | 0.076±0.002 bB | 0.079±0.019 cC | 0.278±0.032 cB | |
SN7-2 | 0.040±0.003 aA | 0.097±0.007 aA | 0.266±0.009 aA | 0.657±0.005 aA | |
CK | 0.024±0.001 bB | 0.072±0.013 bB | 0.186±0.006 bB | 0.296±0.029 cB | |
滴施Drip irrigation | SMH12 | 0.016±0.002 cC | 0.138±0.006 abA | 0.209±0.004 cC | 0.372±0.026 cC |
T6 | 0.055±0.002 aA | 0.123±0.012 bAB | 0.311±0.015 aA | 0.753±0.019 aA | |
SN7-2 | 0.023±0.001 bB | 0.161±0.015 aA | 0.261±0.017 bB | 0.567±0.020 bB | |
CK | 0.022±0.001 bB | 0.072±0.024 cB | 0.189±0.006 dC | 0.358±0.029 cC |
接种方式 Inoculation method | 根瘤菌 Rhizobia | 茎 Straw | 叶 Leaf | 荚 Pod | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
V4 | R2 | R4 | R6 | R8 | V4 | R2 | R4 | R6 | R4 | R6 | R8 | ||||
拌种 | SMH12 | 25.60 | 22.07 | 25.29 | 11.33 | 10.00 | 74.40 | 77.93 | 45.14 | 30.67 | 29.57 | 58.00 | 90.00 | ||
Seed dressing | T6 | 24.78 | 21.15 | 22.76 | 12.70 | 9.13 | 75.22 | 78.85 | 52.59 | 30.85 | 24.66 | 56.45 | 90.87 | ||
SN7-2 | 25.90 | 21.92 | 23.52 | 12.65 | 11.19 | 74.10 | 78.08 | 55.16 | 30.33 | 21.32 | 57.02 | 88.81 | |||
CK | 27.61 | 24.27 | 26.15 | 13.17 | 11.29 | 72.39 | 75.73 | 52.91 | 30.92 | 20.94 | 55.91 | 88.71 | |||
种肥 | SMH12 | 23.49 | 25.94 | 22.95 | 16.46 | 8.56 | 76.51 | 74.06 | 55.76 | 38.13 | 21.29 | 45.41 | 91.44 | ||
Seed manure | T6 | 20.46 | 26.12 | 21.16 | 13.47 | 8.17 | 79.54 | 73.88 | 57.07 | 34.91 | 21.77 | 51.62 | 91.83 | ||
SN7-2 | 24.47 | 25.13 | 21.35 | 15.33 | 8.55 | 75.53 | 74.87 | 52.78 | 35.74 | 25.87 | 48.92 | 91.45 | |||
CK | 24.55 | 27.67 | 25.32 | 15.41 | 10.23 | 75.45 | 72.33 | 53.80 | 35.97 | 20.89 | 48.62 | 89.77 | |||
滴施 | SMH12 | 25.93 | 25.11 | 21.69 | 16.15 | 9.72 | 74.07 | 74.89 | 53.66 | 42.42 | 24.65 | 41.43 | 90.28 | ||
Drip | T6 | 24.59 | 26.45 | 26.01 | 14.02 | 9.58 | 75.41 | 73.55 | 53.98 | 38.55 | 20.01 | 47.43 | 90.42 | ||
irrigation | SN7-2 | 22.65 | 24.86 | 22.00 | 16.57 | 12.06 | 77.35 | 75.14 | 57.24 | 39.20 | 20.76 | 44.23 | 87.94 | ||
CK | 26.46 | 27.84 | 25.11 | 13.51 | 11.32 | 73.54 | 72.16 | 53.92 | 36.45 | 20.97 | 50.04 | 88.68 |
表2 不同时期大豆地上部干物质分配
Table 2 Dry matter allocation in the above ground of soybean at different growth stages %
接种方式 Inoculation method | 根瘤菌 Rhizobia | 茎 Straw | 叶 Leaf | 荚 Pod | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
V4 | R2 | R4 | R6 | R8 | V4 | R2 | R4 | R6 | R4 | R6 | R8 | ||||
拌种 | SMH12 | 25.60 | 22.07 | 25.29 | 11.33 | 10.00 | 74.40 | 77.93 | 45.14 | 30.67 | 29.57 | 58.00 | 90.00 | ||
Seed dressing | T6 | 24.78 | 21.15 | 22.76 | 12.70 | 9.13 | 75.22 | 78.85 | 52.59 | 30.85 | 24.66 | 56.45 | 90.87 | ||
SN7-2 | 25.90 | 21.92 | 23.52 | 12.65 | 11.19 | 74.10 | 78.08 | 55.16 | 30.33 | 21.32 | 57.02 | 88.81 | |||
CK | 27.61 | 24.27 | 26.15 | 13.17 | 11.29 | 72.39 | 75.73 | 52.91 | 30.92 | 20.94 | 55.91 | 88.71 | |||
种肥 | SMH12 | 23.49 | 25.94 | 22.95 | 16.46 | 8.56 | 76.51 | 74.06 | 55.76 | 38.13 | 21.29 | 45.41 | 91.44 | ||
Seed manure | T6 | 20.46 | 26.12 | 21.16 | 13.47 | 8.17 | 79.54 | 73.88 | 57.07 | 34.91 | 21.77 | 51.62 | 91.83 | ||
SN7-2 | 24.47 | 25.13 | 21.35 | 15.33 | 8.55 | 75.53 | 74.87 | 52.78 | 35.74 | 25.87 | 48.92 | 91.45 | |||
CK | 24.55 | 27.67 | 25.32 | 15.41 | 10.23 | 75.45 | 72.33 | 53.80 | 35.97 | 20.89 | 48.62 | 89.77 | |||
滴施 | SMH12 | 25.93 | 25.11 | 21.69 | 16.15 | 9.72 | 74.07 | 74.89 | 53.66 | 42.42 | 24.65 | 41.43 | 90.28 | ||
Drip | T6 | 24.59 | 26.45 | 26.01 | 14.02 | 9.58 | 75.41 | 73.55 | 53.98 | 38.55 | 20.01 | 47.43 | 90.42 | ||
irrigation | SN7-2 | 22.65 | 24.86 | 22.00 | 16.57 | 12.06 | 77.35 | 75.14 | 57.24 | 39.20 | 20.76 | 44.23 | 87.94 | ||
CK | 26.46 | 27.84 | 25.11 | 13.51 | 11.32 | 73.54 | 72.16 | 53.92 | 36.45 | 20.97 | 50.04 | 88.68 |
接种方式 Inoculation method | 根瘤菌 Rhizobia | 主茎节数 Node number of main stem | 单株荚数 Pod number per plant | 单株粒数 Seed number per plant | 百粒重 100-seed weight/g | 产量 Yield/ (kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
拌种 | SMH12 | 12.8±1.9 aA | 38.6±0.5 cC | 106.4±0.7 bB | 20.2±0.3 aA | 4 651.5±64.0 cC |
Seed dressing | T6 | 13.2±0.4 aA | 35.4±0.5 bB | 98.0±1.0 aA | 18.8±0.3 cB | 5 208.8±22.0 bB |
SN7-2 | 13.4±1.1 aA | 44.6±0.5 cBC | 105.0±0.9 abAB | 19.6±0.5 abAB | 5 946.0±52.4 aA | |
CK | 12.6±1.5 aA | 33.4±0.9 aA | 88.2±0.8 aAB | 19.2±0.1 bcAB | 4 120.6±18.0 dD | |
种肥 | SMH12 | 11.4±0.9 aA | 26.2±0.8 bB | 77.0±1.0 bB | 20.6±0.3 aA | 5 446.6±58.7 aA |
Seed manure | T6 | 11.0±0.7 aA | 26.0±0.7 bB | 67.0±0.7 aA | 18.9±0.1 bB | 3 305.3±88.4 cC |
SN7-2 | 11.4±0.9 aA | 31.6±0.5 bB | 82.6±0.9 bB | 19.2±0.3 bB | 5 461.6±61.7 aA | |
CK | 11.0±1.0 aA | 25.8±0.8 aA | 66.6±0.9 aA | 19.1±0.1 bB | 3 957.4±56.2 bB | |
滴施 | SMH12 | 11.6±1.7 bA | 37.4±0.9 bA | 101.8±1.5 bB | 16.5±0.2 cB | 4 739.6±52.4 cB |
Drip irrigation | T6 | 14.4±1.1 aA | 48..0±0.7 aA | 117.0±1.2 aA | 17.4±0.0 bA | 5 888.6±61.0 aA |
SN7-2 | 13.4±1.1 abA | 38..0±1.2 bA | 102.6±0.9 bB | 17.9±0.3 aA | 4 948.4±46.7 bB | |
CK | 11.8±0.8 bA | 36.6±0.5 bA | 84.0±1.2 cC | 16.4±0.3 cB | 4 094.8±54.7 dC |
表3 不同处理大豆的产量及其构成因素
Table 3 Constitutive components of soybean yield
接种方式 Inoculation method | 根瘤菌 Rhizobia | 主茎节数 Node number of main stem | 单株荚数 Pod number per plant | 单株粒数 Seed number per plant | 百粒重 100-seed weight/g | 产量 Yield/ (kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
拌种 | SMH12 | 12.8±1.9 aA | 38.6±0.5 cC | 106.4±0.7 bB | 20.2±0.3 aA | 4 651.5±64.0 cC |
Seed dressing | T6 | 13.2±0.4 aA | 35.4±0.5 bB | 98.0±1.0 aA | 18.8±0.3 cB | 5 208.8±22.0 bB |
SN7-2 | 13.4±1.1 aA | 44.6±0.5 cBC | 105.0±0.9 abAB | 19.6±0.5 abAB | 5 946.0±52.4 aA | |
CK | 12.6±1.5 aA | 33.4±0.9 aA | 88.2±0.8 aAB | 19.2±0.1 bcAB | 4 120.6±18.0 dD | |
种肥 | SMH12 | 11.4±0.9 aA | 26.2±0.8 bB | 77.0±1.0 bB | 20.6±0.3 aA | 5 446.6±58.7 aA |
Seed manure | T6 | 11.0±0.7 aA | 26.0±0.7 bB | 67.0±0.7 aA | 18.9±0.1 bB | 3 305.3±88.4 cC |
SN7-2 | 11.4±0.9 aA | 31.6±0.5 bB | 82.6±0.9 bB | 19.2±0.3 bB | 5 461.6±61.7 aA | |
CK | 11.0±1.0 aA | 25.8±0.8 aA | 66.6±0.9 aA | 19.1±0.1 bB | 3 957.4±56.2 bB | |
滴施 | SMH12 | 11.6±1.7 bA | 37.4±0.9 bA | 101.8±1.5 bB | 16.5±0.2 cB | 4 739.6±52.4 cB |
Drip irrigation | T6 | 14.4±1.1 aA | 48..0±0.7 aA | 117.0±1.2 aA | 17.4±0.0 bA | 5 888.6±61.0 aA |
SN7-2 | 13.4±1.1 abA | 38..0±1.2 bA | 102.6±0.9 bB | 17.9±0.3 aA | 4 948.4±46.7 bB | |
CK | 11.8±0.8 bA | 36.6±0.5 bA | 84.0±1.2 cC | 16.4±0.3 cB | 4 094.8±54.7 dC |
[1] |
HERRIDGE D F, PEOPLES M B, BODDEY R M. Global inputs of biological nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems[J]. Plant and Soil, 2008, 311(1/2):1-18.
DOI URL |
[2] |
OHWAKI Y, SUGAHARA K. Active extrusion of protons and exudation of carboxylic acids in response to iron deficiency by roots of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)[J]. Plant and Soil, 1997, 189(1):49-55.
DOI URL |
[3] |
ALVES B J R, BODDEY R M, URQUIAGA S. The success of BNF in soybean in Brazil[J]. Plant and Soil, 2003, 252(1):1-9.
DOI URL |
[4] |
SERVICE R F. AGBIOTECH: a growing threat down on the farm[J]. Science, 2007, 316(5828):1114-1117.
DOI URL |
[5] | 高圣超. 接种大豆根瘤菌对东北黑土细菌群落影响及其调控作用[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2017. |
GAO S C. Effects of inoculating soybean rhizobia on bacterial community in black soil of northeast China and its regulation[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 马中雨, 李俊, 张永芳, 等. 大豆根瘤菌与大豆品种共生匹配性研究[J]. 大豆科学, 2008, 27(2):221-227. |
MA Z Y, LI J, ZHANG Y F, et al. Symbiotic matching between soybean Rhizobium and soybean cultivars[J]. Soybean Science, 2008, 27(2):221-227.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 关大伟, 李力, 岳现录, 等. 我国大豆的生物固氮潜力研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(6):1497-1504. |
GUAN D W, LI L, YUE X L, et al. Study on potential of biological nitrogen fixation of soybean in China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2014, 20(6):1497-1504.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 马霞, 王丽丽, 李卫军, 等. 不同施氮水平下接种根瘤菌对苜蓿固氮效能及种子生产的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(1):95-102. |
MA X, WANG L L, LI W J, et al. Effects of different nitrogen levels on nitrogen fixation and seed production of alfalfa inoculated with rhizobia[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(1):95-102.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 衡楠楠, 陈远学, 徐开未, 等. 大豆根瘤菌SCAUs8的接种效果、促生性及系统发育研究[J]. 微生物学通报, 2016, 43(8):1708-1714. |
HENG N N, CHEN Y X, XU K W, et al. Field assessment of symbiotic efficiency, growth-promoting ability and phylogeny of soybean rhizobial strain SCAUs8[J]. Microbiology China, 2016, 43(8):1708-1714.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 裴晓峰, 关大伟, 李俊, 等. 耐旱大豆根瘤菌的筛选及其接种效应[J]. 大豆科学, 2012, 31(3):420-424. |
PEI X F, GUAN D W, LI J, et al. Screening of drought-tolerance Rhizobium and its influence on soybean[J]. Soybean Science, 2012, 31(3):420-424.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 梅沛沛, 王平, 李隆, 等. 新开垦土壤上构建玉米/蚕豆-根瘤菌高效固氮模式[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(1):62-74. |
MEI P P, WANG P, LI L, et al. Construction of efficient nitrogen-fixing cropping pattern: Maize/Faba bean intercrop with Rhizobium inoculation in reclaimed low-fertility soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2018, 26(1):62-74.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] |
BOGINO P, BANCHIO E, BONFIGLIO C, et al. Competitiveness of a Bradyrhizobium sp. strain in soils containing indigenous rhizobia[J]. Current Microbiology, 2008, 56(1):66-72.
DOI URL |
[13] | 李仲元, 关桂兰, 王卫卫, 等. 新疆干旱条件下根瘤菌应用中的几个问题[J]. 干旱区研究, 1988, 5(1):9-18. |
LI Z Y, GUAN G L, WANG W W, et al. Some problems in application of rhizobia under drought conditions in Xinjiang[J]. Arid Zone Research, 1988, 5(1):9-18.(in Chinese) | |
[14] | 伍惠, 钟喆栋, 王学路, 等. 与黑龙江大豆主栽品种匹配的优良根瘤菌筛选与鉴定[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2018, 24(1):39-46. |
WU H, ZHONG Z D, WANG X L, et al. Screening and identification of elite rhizobia matched with main cultivars of soybean in Heilongjiang Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2018, 24(1):39-46.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 伍惠, 钟喆栋, 樊伟, 等. 8株优良大豆根瘤菌与不同地区27个大豆主栽品种的匹配性研究[J]. 大豆科学, 2017, 36(3):405-418. |
WU H, ZHONG Z D, FAN W, et al. Symbiotic compatibility among eight elite soybean rhizobia strains and twenty-seven soybean cultivars from different planting regions[J]. Soybean Science, 2017, 36(3):405-418.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 刘庆莉, 王金生, 刘丽君, 等. 大豆根瘤菌剂载体的选择及最佳施用浓度筛选[J]. 大豆科学, 2014, 33(2):207-210. |
LIU Q L, WANG J S, LIU L J, et al. Chosen of soybean rhizobia carrier and screening of the best concentration[J]. Soybean Science, 2014, 33(2):207-210.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] |
ALTHABEGOITI M J, LÓPEZ-GARCÍA S L, PICCINETTI C, et al. Strain selection for improvement of Bradyrhizobium japonicum competitiveness for nodulation of soybean[J]. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 2008, 282(1):115-123.
DOI URL |
[18] |
GUAN D W, MA M C, MA Z Y, et al. Analysis of two Bradyrhizobium japonicum strains with different symbiotic matching for nodulation by primary proteomic[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2012, 11(8):1377-1383.
DOI URL |
[19] | 张红侠, 冯瑞华, 关大伟, 等. 黄土高原地区优良大豆根瘤菌的筛选与接种方式研究[J]. 大豆科学, 2010, 29(6):996-1002. |
ZHANG H X, FENG R H, GUAN D W, et al. Screening of superior soybean rhizobial strains and analyzing of different inoculation methods in loess plateau region of China[J]. Soybean Science, 2010, 29(6):996-1002.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 刘佳, 张杰, 秦文婧, 等. 施氮和接种根瘤菌对红壤旱地花生生长及氮素累积的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2016, 30(12):2441-2450. |
LIU J, ZHANG J, QIN W J, et al. Effects of nitrogen application and rhizobia inoculation on peanut growth and nitrogen accumulation in red soil upland[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 30(12):2441-2450.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 王金生, 丁宁, 吴俊江, 等. 大豆根瘤菌接种效应及竞争结瘤能力分析[J]. 大豆科学, 2017, 36(5):761-767. |
WANG J S, DING N, WU J J, et al. Analysis of the inoculation effect of soybean rhizobia and the competitive nodulation ability[J]. Soybean Science, 2017, 36(5):761-767.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] |
MISHRA P K, BISHT S C, MISHRA S, et al. Coinoculation of Rhizobium leguminosarum-pr1 with a cold tolerant Pseudomonas sp. improves iron acquisition, nutrient uptake and growth of field pea (Pisum sativum L.)[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2012, 35(2):243-256.
DOI URL |
[23] | 唐江华, 苏丽丽, 罗家祥, 等. 不同耕作方式对夏大豆干物质积累及转运特性的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2015, 29(10):2026-2032. |
TANG J H, SU L L, LUO J X, et al. Effects of different tillage methods on dry matter accumulation and transfer characteristics of summer soybean[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 29(10):2026-2032.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 马家斌, 于晓波, 吴海英, 等. 接种根瘤菌对西南地区大豆光合性能和固氮能力的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2020, 42(1):102-108. |
MA J B, YU X B, WU H Y, et al. Effects of inoculation of different Rhizobium on photosynthetic characteristics and nitrogen fixation of soybean[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2020, 42(1):102-108.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 庞婷, 陈平, 袁晓婷, 等. 种间距对不同结瘤特性套作大豆物质积累、鼓粒及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(21):3751-3762. |
PANG T, CHEN P, YUAN X T, et al. Effects of row spacing on dry matter accumulation, grain filling and yield formation of different nodulation characteristic soybeans in intercropping[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(21):3751-3762.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | BREAR E M, DAY D A, SMITH P M C. Iron: an essential micronutrient for the legume-Rhizobium symbiosis[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2013, 4:359. |
[27] | 李涛, 关大伟, 李俊, 等. 黄淮海地区优良大豆根瘤菌株的筛选与接种方式研究[J]. 大豆科学, 2010, 29(4):645-650. |
LI T, GUAN D W, LI J, et al. Screening of superior soybean rhizobial strains and approach to inoculation methods for region of HuangHuaiHai[J]. Soybean Science, 2010, 29(4):645-650.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 郑浩宇, 黄炳林, 王孟雪, 等. 氮肥减施与接种根瘤菌对大豆光合与产量的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2019, 38(3):413-420. |
ZHENG H Y, HUANG B L, WANG M X, et al. The effect of nitrogen fertilizer reduction and Rhizobium inoculation on soybean photosynjournal and yield[J]. Soybean Science, 2019, 38(3):413-420.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | LANIER J E, JORDAN D L, SPEARS J F, et al. Peanut response to inoculation and nitrogen fertilizer[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2005, 97(1):79-84. |
[1] | 王佳, 慕瑞瑞, 杨乔乔, 刘伟, 张月荷, 康建宏. 滴灌水肥一体化下施钾量对宁夏春玉米叶绿素荧光特性与产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(8): 1347-1357. |
[2] | 齐振宇, 蔡溧聪, 胡卫珍, 蔡盼, 张龙平, 任艳云, 周艳虹. 水肥一体化模式中化肥减施与不同基追肥比例对大蒜产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(8): 1409-1415. |
[3] | 刘艳伟, 周潇, 杨启良, 茶品元. 不同施肥和灌溉水平对三七生长特性和发病率的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(8): 1426-1435. |
[4] | 汪峰, 谌江华, 陈若霞, 史骏, 任少鹏, 金树权, 姚红燕, 朱德峰, 戴瑶璐. 减氮对甬优籼粳杂交稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(6): 984-992. |
[5] | 李清斌, 秦奔奔, 李盈盈, 范凯锋, 杨栋, 陈磊, 刘鹍. 连阴雨寡日照对大棚草莓小气候、产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(5): 831-839. |
[6] | 厉宝仙, 王保君, 怀燕, 沈亚强, 张红梅, 程旺大. 水稻-红鳌螯虾共作对稻田土壤养分、碳库与稻米品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(4): 688-696. |
[7] | 李金武, 郁继华, 吕剑, 冯致, 杨海兴, 车旭升, 秦启杰, 张洋, 金宁. 不同覆盖方式对高原夏季露地松花菜产量、品质和土壤养分的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(9): 1626-1633. |
[8] | 郑许松, 钟列权, 王会福, 陈方景, 成丽萍, 徐启强, 李阳, 钟旭华, 吕仲贤. 减肥控制病虫害技术在浙江省不同稻区的实践[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(9): 1656-1664. |
[9] | 张统帅, 闫丽娟, 李广, 陈国鹏, 罗永忠. 免耕和秸秆覆盖对旱作区土壤氮素、水分和春小麦产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(8): 1329-1341. |
[10] | 韩立杰, 董伟欣, 张月辰. 不同水肥处理对小麦冠层结构、产量和籽粒品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(6): 953-962. |
[11] | 任云, 李强, 李哲馨, 刘奕清, 唐建民. 不同世代生姜组培苗物质生产特性与产量形成差异[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(4): 661-670. |
[12] | 李乐, 田敏娇, 高艳明, 李建设. 硒肥对基质培番茄生长和矿质元素积累的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(2): 253-261. |
[13] | 韩悌倩, 刘震, 刘玉汇, 张小静, 王丽, 张俊莲. 减氮及有机替代对马铃薯根系形态和产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(12): 2111-2118. |
[14] | 鲍烈, 王曼韬, 刘江川, 文波, 明月. 基于卷积神经网络的小麦产量预估方法[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(12): 2244-2252. |
[15] | 马瑞芳, 马进川, 马军伟, 周大云, 王强, 丁潮洪. 四季豆丽芸2号生长动态及其养分吸收规律[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(1): 80-85. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||