浙江农业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 1852-1860.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.10.08
任倩倩1,2(), 孙纪霞1, 张德顺3, 丁兆堂4, 张英杰1, 张京伟2,*()
收稿日期:
2020-08-25
出版日期:
2021-10-25
发布日期:
2021-11-02
通讯作者:
张京伟
作者简介:
张京伟,E-mail: jingweizhang.000@163.com基金资助:
REN Qianqian1,2(), SUN Jixia1, ZHANG Deshun3, DING Zhaotang4, ZHANG Yingjie1, ZHANG Jingwei2,*()
Received:
2020-08-25
Online:
2021-10-25
Published:
2021-11-02
Contact:
ZHANG Jingwei
摘要:
探究不同干旱胁迫对绣球生长的影响,评价其抗旱性。以6个绣球品种为试材,利用盆栽控水法,分别设置常态(CK)、轻度干旱胁迫(T1)、中度干旱胁迫(T2)、重干旱胁迫(T3)和特重干旱胁迫(T4)处理模拟干旱胁迫,测定其生物量、根冠比、叶片相对含水量、细胞膜透性、叶绿素(Chl)和类胡萝卜素(Car)、丙二醛(MDA)、脯氨酸(Pro)、过氧化物酶(POD)、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、可溶性糖(SS)和可溶性蛋白(SP)等15个生理指标的动态变化,运用主成分分析法、隶属函数法和聚类分析法对其抗旱性进行综合评价。在干旱胁迫下,各绣球品种的生物量和相对含水量呈下降趋势,根冠比、相对电导率、MDA、Pro和SS呈上升趋势,但各品种上升幅度有所差异,SOD、POD和SP呈先上升后下降的趋势,绣球的光合色素变化规律不明显。6种绣球抗旱性由强到弱排序为:万华镜>爱你的吻>头花>白色天使>花手鞠>夏祭。
中图分类号:
任倩倩, 孙纪霞, 张德顺, 丁兆堂, 张英杰, 张京伟. 干旱胁迫下不同绣球品种生理响应与抗旱性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(10): 1852-1860.
REN Qianqian, SUN Jixia, ZHANG Deshun, DING Zhaotang, ZHANG Yingjie, ZHANG Jingwei. Physiological response and drought resistance evaluation of different Hydrangea varieties under drought stress[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(10): 1852-1860.
图3 干旱胁迫对6个绣球品种MDA含量和SOD、POD活性的影响
Fig.3 Effect of drought stress on malondialdehyde content, activity of superoxide dismutase and peroxidase of six Hydrangea varieties
光合色素 Photosynthetic pigment | 处理 Treat- ment | 品种Variety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
花手鞠 Stockings | 头花 Corsage | 爱你的吻 Love You Kiss | 白色天使 White Angel | 夏祭 Summer Sacrifice | 万华镜 Mangek you | ||
Chla | CK | 1.22±0.10 Aa | 1.28±0.12 Aa | 1.21±0.15 Bab | 1.18±0.21 Bb | 1.06±0.17 ABa | 1.10±0.08 Bc |
T1 | 1.46±0.29 Aa | 1.11±0.32 Aa | 1.08±0.16 Ba | 0.96±0.09 Aa | 1.05±0.29Ba | 1.10±0.30 Aa | |
T2 | 1.58±0.08 Aa | 1.53±0.08 Aa | 1.44±0.18 Aa | 1.35±0.11 Aa | 1.45±0.34 ABa | 1.42±0.14 Aa | |
T3 | 1.35±0.22 Ab | 1.45±0.18 Ab | 1.43±0.12 ABb | 1.40±0.07 Ab | 1.39±0.09 Aa | 1.40±0.11 ABc | |
T4 | 1.54±0.13 Aa | 1.41±0.31 Aa | 1.35±0.30 ABa | 1.34±0.15 Aa | 1.48±0.16 ABa | 1.44±0.07 Aa | |
Chlb | CK | 0.50±0.06 Aab | 0.79±0.49 Aa | 0.77±0.06 Bab | 0.76±0.08 Cb | 0.45±0.10 Bab | 0.46±0.02 Cb |
T1 | 0.98±0.17 Aa | 0.86±0.20 Ab | 0.72±0.03 Bb | 0.57±0.04 Cb | 0.49±0.19 Bb | 0.52±0.14 Ab | |
T2 | 0.77±0.13 Aa | 0.72±0.05 Aa | 0.62±0.22 Aa | 0.56±0.09 Aa | 0.71±0.24 Ba | 0.69±0.07 Ba | |
T3 | 0.58±0.14 Ab | 0.62±0.14 Ab | 0.61±0.08 ABb | 0.59±0.04 ABb | 0.61±0.17 Aa | 0.60±0.06 BCb | |
T4 | 1.19±0.83 Ab | 1.12±1.16 Ab | 1.27±0.14 Bb | 1.68±0.14 Cb | 1.75±0.74 Ba | 1.07±0.02 BCb | |
Chla+b | CK | 2.48±0.11 Aab | 1.94±0.77 Ab | 1.93±0.07 Aab | 1.87±0.08 ABa | 2.35±0.07 Aab | 2.39±0.15 Aab |
T1 | 1.49±0.17 Ca | 1.26±0.99 Aa | 1.66±0.40 Aa | 1.91±0.12 ABa | 2.20±0.19 Aa | 2.12±0.70 Aa | |
T2 | 2.07±0.21 ABCa | 2.16±0.11 Aa | 2.32±0.35 Aa | 2.41±0.11 Ba | 2.15±0.24 Aa | 2.16±0.05 Aa | |
T3 | 2.37±0.18 ABa | 2.38±0.28 Aa | 2.36±0.08 Aa | 2.42±0.02 ABa | 2.34±0.23 Bb | 2.37±0.25 Aa | |
T4 | 1.68±0.84 BCab | 1.77±1.14 Abc | 1.70±0.11 Aab | 1.31±0.63 Aa | 1.22±0.15 Cc | 1.86±0.15 Aab | |
Chla/b | CK | 0.50±0.16 Bab | 0.64±0.60 ABa | 0.69±0.20 Babc | 0.78±0.29 Cbc | 0.66±0.26 BCa | 0.56±0.09 Dc |
T1 | 0.98±0.45 ABa | 0.92±0.18 Bb | 0.85±0.14 Bb | 0.72±0.13 Bb | 0.59±0.49 Cb | 0.53±0.16 Aab | |
T2 | 0.77±0.21 ABa | 0.75±0.13 ABa | 0.71±0.40 Aa | 0.64±0.19 Aa | 0.63±0.56 BCa | 0.65±0.21 ABa | |
T3 | 0.58±0.37 ABbc | 0.60±0.31 ABb | 0.60±0.20 ABb | 0.61±0.09 Ab | 0.60±0.26 Ba | 0.60±0.15 Cc | |
T4 | 1.19±0.90 Ab | 1.16±1.44 Ab | 1.19±0.44 Bb | 1.36±0.29 Bb | 1.57±0.58 Aa | 1.50±0.08 BCb | |
Car | CK | 2.48±0.05 Ca | 2.21±0.08 Aa | 2.12±0.06 Bab | 1.91±0.07 b | 2.05±0.07 Ba | 2.21±0.01 Cb |
T1 | 1.49±0.08 Aa | 1.37±0.02 Ab | 1.47±0.03 ABb | 1.61±0.04 ABb | 1.92±0.12 Bb | 2.08±0.04 Ab | |
T2 | 2.07±0.05 ABCa | 2.12±0.04 Aa | 2.18±0.10 Aa | 2.30±0.06 Aa | 2.30±0.14 Ba | 2.24±0.04 Ba | |
T3 | 2.37±0.08 BCbc | 2.37±0.07 Abc | 2.37±0.04 ABbc | 2.39±0.06 Ab | 2.37±0.05 ABa | 2.38±0.05 Bc | |
T4 | 1.68±0.14 ABab | 1.73±0.27 Aab | 1.72±0.11 Bb | 1.60±0.16 ABb | 1.41±0.03 Aa | 1.47±0.02 Bb |
表1 干旱胁迫对6个绣球品种光合色素含量的影响
Table 1 Effect of drought stress on photosynthetic pigment content of six Hydrangea varieties
光合色素 Photosynthetic pigment | 处理 Treat- ment | 品种Variety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
花手鞠 Stockings | 头花 Corsage | 爱你的吻 Love You Kiss | 白色天使 White Angel | 夏祭 Summer Sacrifice | 万华镜 Mangek you | ||
Chla | CK | 1.22±0.10 Aa | 1.28±0.12 Aa | 1.21±0.15 Bab | 1.18±0.21 Bb | 1.06±0.17 ABa | 1.10±0.08 Bc |
T1 | 1.46±0.29 Aa | 1.11±0.32 Aa | 1.08±0.16 Ba | 0.96±0.09 Aa | 1.05±0.29Ba | 1.10±0.30 Aa | |
T2 | 1.58±0.08 Aa | 1.53±0.08 Aa | 1.44±0.18 Aa | 1.35±0.11 Aa | 1.45±0.34 ABa | 1.42±0.14 Aa | |
T3 | 1.35±0.22 Ab | 1.45±0.18 Ab | 1.43±0.12 ABb | 1.40±0.07 Ab | 1.39±0.09 Aa | 1.40±0.11 ABc | |
T4 | 1.54±0.13 Aa | 1.41±0.31 Aa | 1.35±0.30 ABa | 1.34±0.15 Aa | 1.48±0.16 ABa | 1.44±0.07 Aa | |
Chlb | CK | 0.50±0.06 Aab | 0.79±0.49 Aa | 0.77±0.06 Bab | 0.76±0.08 Cb | 0.45±0.10 Bab | 0.46±0.02 Cb |
T1 | 0.98±0.17 Aa | 0.86±0.20 Ab | 0.72±0.03 Bb | 0.57±0.04 Cb | 0.49±0.19 Bb | 0.52±0.14 Ab | |
T2 | 0.77±0.13 Aa | 0.72±0.05 Aa | 0.62±0.22 Aa | 0.56±0.09 Aa | 0.71±0.24 Ba | 0.69±0.07 Ba | |
T3 | 0.58±0.14 Ab | 0.62±0.14 Ab | 0.61±0.08 ABb | 0.59±0.04 ABb | 0.61±0.17 Aa | 0.60±0.06 BCb | |
T4 | 1.19±0.83 Ab | 1.12±1.16 Ab | 1.27±0.14 Bb | 1.68±0.14 Cb | 1.75±0.74 Ba | 1.07±0.02 BCb | |
Chla+b | CK | 2.48±0.11 Aab | 1.94±0.77 Ab | 1.93±0.07 Aab | 1.87±0.08 ABa | 2.35±0.07 Aab | 2.39±0.15 Aab |
T1 | 1.49±0.17 Ca | 1.26±0.99 Aa | 1.66±0.40 Aa | 1.91±0.12 ABa | 2.20±0.19 Aa | 2.12±0.70 Aa | |
T2 | 2.07±0.21 ABCa | 2.16±0.11 Aa | 2.32±0.35 Aa | 2.41±0.11 Ba | 2.15±0.24 Aa | 2.16±0.05 Aa | |
T3 | 2.37±0.18 ABa | 2.38±0.28 Aa | 2.36±0.08 Aa | 2.42±0.02 ABa | 2.34±0.23 Bb | 2.37±0.25 Aa | |
T4 | 1.68±0.84 BCab | 1.77±1.14 Abc | 1.70±0.11 Aab | 1.31±0.63 Aa | 1.22±0.15 Cc | 1.86±0.15 Aab | |
Chla/b | CK | 0.50±0.16 Bab | 0.64±0.60 ABa | 0.69±0.20 Babc | 0.78±0.29 Cbc | 0.66±0.26 BCa | 0.56±0.09 Dc |
T1 | 0.98±0.45 ABa | 0.92±0.18 Bb | 0.85±0.14 Bb | 0.72±0.13 Bb | 0.59±0.49 Cb | 0.53±0.16 Aab | |
T2 | 0.77±0.21 ABa | 0.75±0.13 ABa | 0.71±0.40 Aa | 0.64±0.19 Aa | 0.63±0.56 BCa | 0.65±0.21 ABa | |
T3 | 0.58±0.37 ABbc | 0.60±0.31 ABb | 0.60±0.20 ABb | 0.61±0.09 Ab | 0.60±0.26 Ba | 0.60±0.15 Cc | |
T4 | 1.19±0.90 Ab | 1.16±1.44 Ab | 1.19±0.44 Bb | 1.36±0.29 Bb | 1.57±0.58 Aa | 1.50±0.08 BCb | |
Car | CK | 2.48±0.05 Ca | 2.21±0.08 Aa | 2.12±0.06 Bab | 1.91±0.07 b | 2.05±0.07 Ba | 2.21±0.01 Cb |
T1 | 1.49±0.08 Aa | 1.37±0.02 Ab | 1.47±0.03 ABb | 1.61±0.04 ABb | 1.92±0.12 Bb | 2.08±0.04 Ab | |
T2 | 2.07±0.05 ABCa | 2.12±0.04 Aa | 2.18±0.10 Aa | 2.30±0.06 Aa | 2.30±0.14 Ba | 2.24±0.04 Ba | |
T3 | 2.37±0.08 BCbc | 2.37±0.07 Abc | 2.37±0.04 ABbc | 2.39±0.06 Ab | 2.37±0.05 ABa | 2.38±0.05 Bc | |
T4 | 1.68±0.14 ABab | 1.73±0.27 Aab | 1.72±0.11 Bb | 1.60±0.16 ABb | 1.41±0.03 Aa | 1.47±0.02 Bb |
渗透调节物质 Osmotic substance | 处理 Treat- ment | 品种Variety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
花手鞠 Stockings | 头花 Corsage | 爱你的吻 Love You Kiss | 白色天使 White Angel | 夏祭 Summer Sacrifice | 万华镜 Mangek you | ||
Pro | CK | 4.72±0.796 Ba | 10.50±3.72 Ba | 13.92±11.18 Ba | 10.67±5.58 Da | 6.86±2.50 Ca | 10.33±2.49 Ca |
T1 | 5.56±1.35 Bc | 11.71±6.43 Babc | 15.55±2.80 Ba | 14.33±1.26 CDab | 8.22±3.19 Cbc | 11.06±4.60 Cabc | |
T2 | 15.95±2.43 Aab | 12.23±2.49 Bab | 20.23±7.75 Ba | 19.41±1.90 BCa | 8.04±1.55 Cb | 15.75±5.69 Cab | |
T3 | 22.66±3.05 Aa | 19.14±7.73 Ba | 22.04±8.26 Ba | 21.79±1.28 ABa | 24.27±3.92 Ba | 18.60±4.48 ABa | |
T4 | 23.69±8.95 Ac | 33.14±12.54 Abc | 10.89±8.46 Aab | 26.94±1.81Abc | 53.39±7.14Aa | 26.07±6.37Abc | |
SS | CK | 0.29±0.07 Ba | 0.46±0.72 Ca | 0.32±0.11 Ca | 0.28±0.30 Ca | 0.42±0.26 Ba | 0.41±0.23 Da |
T1 | 0.65±0.30 Ba | 0.74±0.11 Ca | 0.89±0.24 Ca | 1.38±1.12 BCa | 1.69±1.05 Ba | 0.96±0.14 CDa | |
T2 | 1.48±0.80 Bc | 1.06±0.31 BCc | 3.99±2.52 Bab | 2.09±1.20 ABbc | 4.85±0.71 Aa | 1.28±0.35 Cc | |
T3 | 3.99±1.22 Aab | 2.62±1.49 ABb | 5.69±1.76 ABa | 2.13±0.55 ABb | 5.13±0.60 Aa | 1.96±0.10 BBb | |
T4 | 5.56±1.92 Aab | 3.94±1.46 Ab | 7.47±1.22 Aa | 3.24±0.79 Ab | 5.34±0.80 Aab | 3.43±0.57 Ab | |
SP | CK | 18.54±2.83 Aa | 140.81±6.02Aab | 15.71±0.65 Aab | 7.18±2.34 Bc | 10.19±4.74 Cbc | 10.85±2.38 Bbc |
T1 | 22.38±2.73 Aab | 25.68±9.81 Ab | 16.85±3.06 Ab | 16.25±3.54 Ab | 38.48±6.57 Aa | 17.94±1.27 Ab | |
T2 | 19.86±5.97 Aab | 21.54±2.22 Aab | 15.71±8.63 Ab | 14.45±2.88 Ab | 27.97±5.31 ABa | 16.07±1.62 Ab | |
T3 | 19.14±2.50 Aab | 18.35±6.16 Aab | 12.95±2.56 Abc | 12.83±0.83 Abc | 24.66±3.71 Ba | 11.81±2.09 Bc | |
T4 | 15.17±4.07 Aa | 16.01±6.55 Aa | 12.23±3.16 Aa | 10.97±3.85 ABa | 21.36±10.58 BCa | 11.03±0.65 Ba |
表2 干旱胁迫对绣球渗透调节物质含量的影响
Table 2 Effect of drought stress on osmotic substances content of six Hydrangea varieties
渗透调节物质 Osmotic substance | 处理 Treat- ment | 品种Variety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
花手鞠 Stockings | 头花 Corsage | 爱你的吻 Love You Kiss | 白色天使 White Angel | 夏祭 Summer Sacrifice | 万华镜 Mangek you | ||
Pro | CK | 4.72±0.796 Ba | 10.50±3.72 Ba | 13.92±11.18 Ba | 10.67±5.58 Da | 6.86±2.50 Ca | 10.33±2.49 Ca |
T1 | 5.56±1.35 Bc | 11.71±6.43 Babc | 15.55±2.80 Ba | 14.33±1.26 CDab | 8.22±3.19 Cbc | 11.06±4.60 Cabc | |
T2 | 15.95±2.43 Aab | 12.23±2.49 Bab | 20.23±7.75 Ba | 19.41±1.90 BCa | 8.04±1.55 Cb | 15.75±5.69 Cab | |
T3 | 22.66±3.05 Aa | 19.14±7.73 Ba | 22.04±8.26 Ba | 21.79±1.28 ABa | 24.27±3.92 Ba | 18.60±4.48 ABa | |
T4 | 23.69±8.95 Ac | 33.14±12.54 Abc | 10.89±8.46 Aab | 26.94±1.81Abc | 53.39±7.14Aa | 26.07±6.37Abc | |
SS | CK | 0.29±0.07 Ba | 0.46±0.72 Ca | 0.32±0.11 Ca | 0.28±0.30 Ca | 0.42±0.26 Ba | 0.41±0.23 Da |
T1 | 0.65±0.30 Ba | 0.74±0.11 Ca | 0.89±0.24 Ca | 1.38±1.12 BCa | 1.69±1.05 Ba | 0.96±0.14 CDa | |
T2 | 1.48±0.80 Bc | 1.06±0.31 BCc | 3.99±2.52 Bab | 2.09±1.20 ABbc | 4.85±0.71 Aa | 1.28±0.35 Cc | |
T3 | 3.99±1.22 Aab | 2.62±1.49 ABb | 5.69±1.76 ABa | 2.13±0.55 ABb | 5.13±0.60 Aa | 1.96±0.10 BBb | |
T4 | 5.56±1.92 Aab | 3.94±1.46 Ab | 7.47±1.22 Aa | 3.24±0.79 Ab | 5.34±0.80 Aab | 3.43±0.57 Ab | |
SP | CK | 18.54±2.83 Aa | 140.81±6.02Aab | 15.71±0.65 Aab | 7.18±2.34 Bc | 10.19±4.74 Cbc | 10.85±2.38 Bbc |
T1 | 22.38±2.73 Aab | 25.68±9.81 Ab | 16.85±3.06 Ab | 16.25±3.54 Ab | 38.48±6.57 Aa | 17.94±1.27 Ab | |
T2 | 19.86±5.97 Aab | 21.54±2.22 Aab | 15.71±8.63 Ab | 14.45±2.88 Ab | 27.97±5.31 ABa | 16.07±1.62 Ab | |
T3 | 19.14±2.50 Aab | 18.35±6.16 Aab | 12.95±2.56 Abc | 12.83±0.83 Abc | 24.66±3.71 Ba | 11.81±2.09 Bc | |
T4 | 15.17±4.07 Aa | 16.01±6.55 Aa | 12.23±3.16 Aa | 10.97±3.85 ABa | 21.36±10.58 BCa | 11.03±0.65 Ba |
指标 Index | 主成分1 Principal component 1 | 主成分2 Principal component 2 | 主成分3 Principal component 3 | 主成分4 Principal component 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
类胡萝卜素含量Carotenoid content | 0.439 | 0.832 | 0.138 | -0.230 |
相对含水量Relative water content | -0.933 | -0.165 | -0.004 | -0.176 |
POD活性Peroxidase activity | 0.814 | 0.291 | 0.073 | 0.148 |
Chlb含量Chlorophyll-b content | 0.759 | 0.545 | 0.132 | -0.193 |
Pro含量Proline content | 0.739 | -0.086 | 0.483 | -0.068 |
Chla+b含量Chlorophyll-a+b content | 0.667 | 0.664 | 0.118 | -0.185 |
MDA含量Malondialdehyde content | 0.662 | 0.240 | -0.495 | 0.206 |
Chla含量Chlorophyll-a content | -0.277 | 0.908 | -0.039 | -0.012 |
Chla/b含量Chlorophyll a/b content | -0.576 | -0.720 | -0.174 | 0.276 |
SP含量Soluble protein content | 0.313 | 0.710 | 0.126 | 0.193 |
相对电导率Relative conductivity | 0.526 | 0.704 | 0.109 | 0.057 |
SOD活性Superoxide dismutase activity | 0.293 | 0.604 | 0.442 | -0.210 |
SS含量Soluble sugar content | -0.031 | 0.148 | 0.857 | 0.163 |
根冠比Root-shoot ratio | -0.300 | -0.283 | -0.588 | 0.343 |
生物量Biomass | 0.160 | -0.064 | 0.004 | 0.869 |
方差贡献率Variance contribution rate/% | 50.67 | 14.06 | 10.45 | 6.76 |
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate/% | 50.67 | 64.73 | 75.19 | 81.94 |
表3 各因子载荷矩阵、方差贡献率及累计贡献率
Table 3 Load matrix, variance contribution rate and cumulative contribution rate of each factor
指标 Index | 主成分1 Principal component 1 | 主成分2 Principal component 2 | 主成分3 Principal component 3 | 主成分4 Principal component 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
类胡萝卜素含量Carotenoid content | 0.439 | 0.832 | 0.138 | -0.230 |
相对含水量Relative water content | -0.933 | -0.165 | -0.004 | -0.176 |
POD活性Peroxidase activity | 0.814 | 0.291 | 0.073 | 0.148 |
Chlb含量Chlorophyll-b content | 0.759 | 0.545 | 0.132 | -0.193 |
Pro含量Proline content | 0.739 | -0.086 | 0.483 | -0.068 |
Chla+b含量Chlorophyll-a+b content | 0.667 | 0.664 | 0.118 | -0.185 |
MDA含量Malondialdehyde content | 0.662 | 0.240 | -0.495 | 0.206 |
Chla含量Chlorophyll-a content | -0.277 | 0.908 | -0.039 | -0.012 |
Chla/b含量Chlorophyll a/b content | -0.576 | -0.720 | -0.174 | 0.276 |
SP含量Soluble protein content | 0.313 | 0.710 | 0.126 | 0.193 |
相对电导率Relative conductivity | 0.526 | 0.704 | 0.109 | 0.057 |
SOD活性Superoxide dismutase activity | 0.293 | 0.604 | 0.442 | -0.210 |
SS含量Soluble sugar content | -0.031 | 0.148 | 0.857 | 0.163 |
根冠比Root-shoot ratio | -0.300 | -0.283 | -0.588 | 0.343 |
生物量Biomass | 0.160 | -0.064 | 0.004 | 0.869 |
方差贡献率Variance contribution rate/% | 50.67 | 14.06 | 10.45 | 6.76 |
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate/% | 50.67 | 64.73 | 75.19 | 81.94 |
品种Variety | U1 | U2 | U3 | U4 | D |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
花手鞠Stockings | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.250 |
头花Corsage | 0.18 | 0.66 | 0.99 | 0.19 | 0.366 |
爱你的吻Love You Kiss | 0.55 | 0.40 | 0.35 | 0.76 | 0.517 |
白色天使White Angel | 0.10 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.09 | 0.294 |
夏祭Summer Sacrifice | 0.00 | 0.54 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.092 |
万华镜Mangek you | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.34 | 0.920 |
权重Weight | 0.617 | 0.172 | 0.128 | 0.083 |
表4 各品种隶属函数值U(Xi)、权重和综合评价值(D)
Table 4 Membership function value U(Xi), weight and comprehensive evaluation value (D) of various varieties
品种Variety | U1 | U2 | U3 | U4 | D |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
花手鞠Stockings | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.250 |
头花Corsage | 0.18 | 0.66 | 0.99 | 0.19 | 0.366 |
爱你的吻Love You Kiss | 0.55 | 0.40 | 0.35 | 0.76 | 0.517 |
白色天使White Angel | 0.10 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.09 | 0.294 |
夏祭Summer Sacrifice | 0.00 | 0.54 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.092 |
万华镜Mangek you | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.34 | 0.920 |
权重Weight | 0.617 | 0.172 | 0.128 | 0.083 |
[1] | 孙强, 虞秀明, 姚红军. 绣球属品种资源收集及扦插生根能力比较[J]. 北方园艺, 2016(11):71-73. |
SUN Q, YU X M, YAO H J. Resource collection and comparison of cuttings rooting ability for Hydrangea L.[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2016(11):71-73.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 杨春. 八仙花的栽培管理技术[J]. 农业工程技术(温室园艺), 2014, 34(1):42. |
YANG C. Cultivation and management techniques of Hydrangea[J]. Agriculture Engineering Technology (Greenhouse & Horticulture), 2014, 34(1):42. | |
[3] | 章毅. 5个绣球品种的抗旱性研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学, 2018. |
ZHANG Y. Study on drought tolerance of 5 cultivars of Hydrangea macrophylla[J]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang A&F University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 陈丽飞, 刘越, 李雪萌, 等. 植物抗旱性研究进展[J]. 吉林农业, 2019(2):78-79. |
CHEN L F, LIU Y, LI X M, et al. Research progress of plant drought resistance[J]. Agriculture of Jilin, 2019(2):78-79. | |
[5] | 李艳, 王庆, 刘国宇, 等. 4种地被植物干旱胁迫下的生理响应及抗旱性评价[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2019, 39(6):9-15. |
LI Y, WANG Q, LIU G Y, et al. Responses of four ground cover plants to drought stress and the comprehensive evaluation on drought resistance capacity[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2019, 39(6):9-15.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 谭艳, 彭尽晖. 植物抗旱机理及抗旱性鉴定方法研究进展[J]. 广西农业科学, 2010, 41(5):423-426. |
TAN Y, PENG J H. Research progress on mechanism and identification methods of drought resistance in plants[J]. Guangxi Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 41(5):423-426.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 孟祥丽, 徐坚, 陈文荣, 等. 4种砧木樱桃的抗旱生理特性及抗旱性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2011, 23(3):533-537. |
MENG X L, XU J, CHEN W R, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of four cherry rootstocks by membership function analysis[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2011, 23(3):533-537.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 邹春蕾, 王丽萍, 辛彬, 等. 不同果形红干椒品系抗旱性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(5):792-797. |
ZOU C L, WANG L P, XIN B, et al. Evaluation on drought resistance of chilli pepper with different fruit shapes[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2015, 27(5):792-797.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 许桂芳, 张朝阳, 向佐湘. 利用隶属函数法对4种珍珠菜属过路黄抗旱性的综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2009, 21(1):59-62. |
XU G F, ZHANG Z Y, XIANG Z X. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of four Lysimachia species by using subordinate function[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2009, 21(1):59-62.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 林蝉蝉, 何舟阳, 单文龙, 等. 基于主成分与聚类分析综合评价杨凌地区红色鲜食葡萄果实品质[J]. 果树学报, 2020, 37(4):520-532. |
LIN C C, HE Z Y, SHAN W L, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality of 12 red table grape cultivars cultivated in Yangling area based on principal component and cluster analyses[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2020, 37(4):520-532.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 郭燕, 张树航, 李颖, 等. 中国板栗238份品种(系)叶片形态、解剖结构及其抗旱性评价[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(6):1033-1046. |
GUO Y, ZHANG S H, LI Y, et al. Studies on the leaf morphology, anatomical structure and drought resistance evaluation of 238 Chinese chestnut varieties(strains)[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2020, 47(6):1033-1046.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 周广生, 梅方竹, 周竹青, 等. 小麦不同品种耐湿性生理指标综合评价及其预测[J]. 中国农业科学, 2003, 36(11):1378-1382. |
ZHOU G S, MEI F Z, ZHOU Z Q, et al. Comprehensive evaluation and forecast on physiological indices of waterlogging resistance of different wheat varieties[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2003, 36(11):1378-1382.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 张庆华, 向发云, 曾祥国, 等. 干旱胁迫下不同品种草莓生理响应及抗旱性评价[J]. 北方园艺, 2018(2):30-37. |
ZHANG Q H, XIANG F Y, ZENG X G, et al. Physiological response of different strawberry cultivars under drought stress and evaluation of drought resistance[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2018(2):30-37.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] |
邱权, 潘昕, 李吉跃, 等. 青藏高原20种灌木抗旱形态和生理特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(6):562-575.
DOI |
QIU Q, PAN X, LI J Y, et al. Morphological traits and physiological characteristics in drought tolerance in 20 shrub species on the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2014, 38(6):562-575.(in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
|
[15] | 董晓晓, 刘雪, 蒋亚蓉, 等. 干旱胁迫对24种宿根花卉生长的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2019, 34(3):125-131. |
DONG X X, LIU X, JIANG Y R, et al. Effect of drought stress on the growth of twenty four perennials[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2019, 34(3):125-131.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 侯茹平, 蒋景龙, 阳妮, 等. 低温胁迫下8种柑橘的生理响应与抗寒性评价[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021(6):2013-2022. |
HOU R P, JIANG J L, YANG N, et al. Physiological response and cold resistance evaluation of eight citrus species under low temperature stress[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2021(6):2013-2022. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 金胶胶, 宋子文, 马晓雨, 等. 大青杨对不同干旱胁迫强度的形态和生理响应[J]. 植物研究, 2019, 39(4):490-496. |
JIN J J, SONG Z W, MA X Y, et al. Morphological and physiological responses of Populus ussuriensis Kom. to drought stress[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2019, 39(4):490-496.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 王平, 王沛, 孙万斌, 等. 8份披碱草属牧草苗期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(2):397-404. |
WANG P, WANG P, SUN W B, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of eight Elymus germplasms at seedling stage[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(2):397-404.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 李永华, 卢琦, 吴波, 等. 干旱区叶片形态特征与植物响应和适应的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(1):88-98. |
LI Y H, LU Q, WU B, et al. A review of leaf morphology plasticity linked to plant response and adaptation characteristics in arid ecosystems[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2012, 36(1):88-98.(in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
|
[20] | 李州, 王晓娟, 彭丹丹, 等. Na+对水分胁迫下白三叶抗氧化防御和有机渗透调节物质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(5):175-183. |
LI Z, WANG X J, PENG D D, et al. Effects of Na+ on antioxidant defence and accumulation of osmoregulatory substances in white clover under water deficit stress[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(5):175-183.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 邵惠芳, 陈征, 许嘉阳, 等. 两种烟草幼苗叶片对不同强度干旱胁迫的生理响应比较[J]. 植物生理学报, 2016, 52(12):1861-1871. |
SHAO H F, CHEN Z, XU J Y, et al. Physiological responses of two tobacco cultivar leaves to different drought stresses during seedling stage[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2016, 52(12):1861-1871.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 冯慧芳, 薛立, 任向荣, 等. 4种阔叶幼苗对PEG模拟干旱的生理响应[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(2):371-382. |
FENG H F, XUE L, REN X R, et al. Physiological responses of four broadleaved seedlings to drought stress simulated by PEG[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(2):371-382.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 卜贤盼, 纠凤凤, 王锋堂, 等. 五唇兰对PEG模拟的干旱胁迫响应研究[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2020, 28(1):53-61. |
BU X P, JIU F F, WANG F T, et al. Response to drought stress simulated by PEG of Phalaenopsis pulcherrima[J]. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 2020, 28(1):53-61.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 肖涵, 张鸿翎, 韩涛, 等. 干旱胁迫对3种宿根花卉生理生化指标的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2019, 34(5):102-107. |
XIAO H, ZHANG H L, HAN T, et al. Effects of drought stress on physiological and biochemical indices of three species perennial flowers[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2019, 34(5):102-107.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 曹晶, 姜卫兵, 翁忙玲, 等. 夏秋季旱涝胁迫对红叶石楠光合特性的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2007, 34(1):163-172. |
CAO J, JIANG W B, WENG M L, et al. Effects of drought and flooding stress on photosynthetic characteristics of Photinia frasery in summer and autumn[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2007, 34(1):163-172.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 董小云, 米超, 刘自刚, 等. PEG模拟水分胁迫对白菜型冬油菜幼苗生长及生长特性的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2018, 52(3):313-321. |
DONG X Y, MI C, LIU Z G, et al. Response of winter rapessed seeding growth and physiological characteristics under PEG drought tolerance[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2018, 52(3):313-321.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 王好运, 吴峰, 吴昌明, 等. 马尾松不同叶型幼苗对干旱及复水的生长及生理响应[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2018, 46(1):1-6. |
WANG H Y, WU F, WU C M, et al. Growth and physiological responses of seedlings with different leaf shapes to drought and re-watering in Pinus massoniana[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2018, 46(1):1-6.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 孔维鹏, 张小艾. 四个无花果品种对干旱胁迫的生理响应及抗旱性评价[J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(增刊1):105-113. |
KONG W P, ZHANG X A. Physiological response and drought resistance evaluation of four fig varieties to drought stress[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2019, 34(S1):105-113.(in Chinesewith English abstract) | |
[29] | 余家林. 农业多元试验统计[M]. 北京: 北京农业大学出版社, 1993:141-192. |
[30] | 田治国, 王飞, 张文娥, 等. 多元统计分析方法在万寿菊品种抗旱性评价中的应用[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(12):3315-3320. |
TIAN Z G, WANG F, ZHANG W E, et al. Drought-resistance evaluation of marigold cultivars based on multiple statistics analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(12):3315-3320.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 王郅琪, 孙建, 梁俊超, 赵云燕, 颜廷献, 颜小文, 危文亮, 乐美旺. 基于分子标记的江西省芝麻地方种质遗传多样性分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(9): 1565-1580. |
[2] | 何庆海, 刘本同, 周政德, 方茹, 杨少宗. 基于枝条和叶片表型性状的掌叶覆盆子种质资源多样性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(9): 1660-1667. |
[3] | 张棚, 张希, 杨雪妍, 刘元林, 李儒, 龙鸣, 田晓静, 张福梅, 陈士恩, 马忠仁. 基于微量元素分析的三七产地及其主侧根鉴别[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(7): 1300-1308. |
[4] | 任倩倩, 张京伟, 孙纪霞, 罗珍珍, 丁兆堂, 张德顺, 张英杰, 郭对田, 郭文姣. 二十五种绣球种质资源分析和综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(6): 1012-1024. |
[5] | 王英珍, 潘芝梅. 二十二份毛花猕猴桃种质资源果实品质的主成分分析与综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(5): 825-830. |
[6] | 郑俊青, 黎瑞源, 郑冉, 吕丹, 陈其皎, 石桃雄, 陈庆富. 苦荞重组自交系群体粒重、粒形与蛋白组分含量的变异[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(4): 565-575. |
[7] | 张婷, 刘慧琴, 郭勤卫, 李朝森, 章心惠, 项小敏, 赵东风, 万红建. 十六份辣椒材料游离氨基酸组成的主成分分析与聚类分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(4): 640-650. |
[8] | 谢子玉, 王可尔, 赵雯靓, 文祖会, 程林润, 徐丽珊. 不同肉色甘薯的营养成分与生物活性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(2): 183-192. |
[9] | 崔鹏飞, 魏灵珠, 程建徽, 向江, 李明山, 吴江, . 不同砧木对天工翠玉葡萄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(1): 52-61. |
[10] | 洪霞, 赵永彬, 屈为栋, 陈银龙, 邱莉萍, 王娇阳. 基于表型性状与简单重复序列标记的浙江省芋种质资源遗传多样性比较[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(9): 1544-1554. |
[11] | 张宇, 张继, 荣涛, 欧克纬, 黄国弟, 宋红霞. 杧果品种亲缘关系的CDDP分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(5): 824-830. |
[12] | 沈迪, 陈龙正, 路晓华, 陶建平, 冯顾城, 刘洁霞, 冯凯, 尹莲, 丁旭, 贾丽丽, 徐志胜, 刘惠吉, 熊爱生. 苏南地区29个秋冬茬芹菜品种资源评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(4): 653-660. |
[13] | 马小华, 俞浙萍, 郑锡良, 胡晓金, 张淑文, 戚行江, 马靖艳. 靖州杨梅引种试验与表型聚类分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(11): 1987-1993. |
[14] | 闫晶秋子, 李钢铁, 刘玉军, 麻云霞, 杨颖. 基于主成分分析及隶属函数法的巨菌草幼苗耐盐碱性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(9): 1531-1540. |
[15] | 曹玥华, 魏灵珠, 沈碧薇, 程建徽, 向江, 吴江. 砧木对新郁葡萄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(6): 908-914. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||