高粱粒重研究进展

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20250492

浙江农业学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (8): 1717-1728.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20250492

• 综述 • 上一篇

高粱粒重研究进展

汪瑶¹^,²(), 史林永²^,³, 张恒², 邹桂花², 朱英²^,^*()

¹ 浙江农林大学现代农学院, 浙江杭州 311300
² 浙江省农业科学院病毒学与生物技术研究所, 农产品质量安全全国重点实验室, 浙江杭州 310021
³ 中国计量大学生命科学学院, 浙江杭州 310018

收稿日期:2025-07-18 出版日期:2026-08-25 发布日期:2026-09-14
作者简介:汪瑶,主要从事高粱叶夹角相关基因的功能研究。E-mail:wangyaowy2023@163.com
通讯作者: *朱英,E-mail:yzhuzaas@163.com

Research progress on sorghum grain weight

WANG Yao¹^,²(), SHI Linyong²^,³, ZHANG Heng², ZOU Guihua², ZHU Ying²^,^*()

¹ College of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
² State Key Laboratory for Quality and Safety of Agro-Products, Institute of Virology and Biotechnology, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China
³ College of Life Sciences, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China

Received:2025-07-18 Published:2026-08-25 Online:2026-09-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

高粱(Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)作为世界第五大粮食作物,在应对全球粮食短缺问题中发挥着重要作用。培育高产优质高粱品种已成为现代高粱育种的核心攻关方向。粒重是决定高粱产量的三大要素之一,通过遗传改良增加粒重已成为提高单产的重要途径。因此,加强高粱籽粒发育的形态生理、遗传机制研究及粒重基因资源发掘,对培育高产品种至关重要。籽粒的形成涉及一系列生理生化代谢网络的协同调控,是受多基因控制的复杂数量性状。本文概述了高粱籽粒发育的形态生理过程及粒重性状的遗传特点,总结了高粱粒重相关数量性状基因座(QTL)/基因的定位及克隆进展,并鉴定了水稻粒重基因在高粱中的同源基因,旨在为后续高粱粒重基因克隆、遗传改良和分子设计育种提供依据,推动高产育种从传统的“经验育种”向定向、高效的“精确育种”转变。

关键词: 高粱, 粒重, 生理, 遗传分析, 基因定位与克隆

Abstract:

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench), as the fifth most important cereal crop worldwide, plays a significant role in addressing global food shortages. Breeding high-yield and high-quality sorghum varieties has become a core objective of modern sorghum breeding. Grain weight is one of the three major determinants of sorghum yield, and increasing grain weight through genetic improvement has become an important approach to enhancing yield per unit area. Therefore, strengthening research on the morphological and physiological processes of grain development, the genetic mechanisms underlying grain weight, and the exploration of grain weight gene resources is essential for breeding high-yielding varieties. Grain formation involves a series of coordinated physiological and biochemical metabolic networks and is a complex quantitative trait controlled by multiple genes. This paper reviews the morphological and physiological processes of sorghum grain development and the genetic characteristics of grain weight traits, summarizes the progress in mapping and cloning of quantitative trait loci (QTLs)/genes associated with sorghum grain weight, and identifies homologous genes of rice grain weight genes in sorghum. The aim is to provide a basis for future cloning of sorghum grain weight genes, genetic improvement, and molecular design breeding, thereby facilitating the transformation of high-yield breeding from traditional “experience-based breeding” to targeted and efficient “precision breeding”.

Key words: sorghum, grain weight, physiology, genetic analysis, gene mapping and cloning

中图分类号:

S514

汪瑶, 史林永, 张恒, 邹桂花, 朱英. 高粱粒重研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(8): 1717-1728.

WANG Yao, SHI Linyong, ZHANG Heng, ZOU Guihua, ZHU Ying. Research progress on sorghum grain weight[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(8): 1717-1728.

图/表 3

参考文献 114

[1]	Wendorf F, Close A E, Schild R, et al. Saharan exploitation of plants 8, 000 years BP[J]. Nature, 1992, 359(6397): 721-724.
[2]	Gilbert N. Averting a climate-led food crisis in Africa[J]. Nature, 2009.
[3]	曾祥忠, 郑传芳, 胡永刚. 加快遵义市酒用高粱产业发展实践与对策[J]. 中国种业, 2013(9): 8-10.
	Zeng X Z, Zheng C F, Hu Y G. Practice and countermeasures of accelerating the development of alcohol sorghum industry in Zunyi City[J]. China Seed Industry, 2013(9): 8-10.
[4]	唐三元, 谢旗. 高粱-小作物大用途[J]. 生物技术通报, 2019(5): 1.
	Tang S Y, Xie Q. Sorghum-small crops with great uses[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2019(5): 1.
[5]	筱鹂. 2023年仁怀酱酒产量达41.1万千升[J]. 酿酒科技, 2024(3): 126.
	Xiao P. In 2023, the output of Renhuai sauce wine reached 411 thousand liters[J]. Liquor-Making Science & Technology, 2024(3): 126.
[6]	范文来. 固态法白酒主要酿酒原料高粱研究的回顾与展望[J]. 酿酒, 2023, 50(2): 3-9.
	Fan W L. Review and prospect of main raw material sorghum for solid-state Baijiu production[J]. Liquor Making, 2023, 50(2): 3-9.
[7]	李顺国, 刘猛, 刘斐, 等. 中国高粱产业和种业发展现状与未来展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(3): 471-482.
	Li S G, Liu M, Liu F, et al. Current status and future prospective of sorghum production and seed industry in China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(3): 471-482.
[8]	邹剑秋, 王艳秋, 柯福来. 高粱产业发展现状及前景展望[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 40(3): 1-8.
	Zou J Q, Wang Y Q, Ke F L. Development status and prospect of sorghum industry in China[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University(Natural Science Edition), 2020, 40(3): 1-8.
[9]	Grassini P, Eskridge K M, Cassman K G. Distinguishing between yield advances and yield plateaus in historical crop production trends[J]. Nature Communications, 2013, 4: 2918.
[10]	杨楠, 丁玉川, 焦晓燕, 等. 种植密度对高粱群体生理指标、产量及其构成因素的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2013, 3(7): 11-17.
	Yang N, Ding Y C, Jiao X Y, et al. Effects of plant density on population physiological indices, grain yield and yield component factors of sorghum[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2013, 3(7): 11-17.
[11]	刘天朋, 丁国祥, 汪小楷, 等. 种植密度对杂交糯高粱群体库源关系的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2016(1): 144-148.
	Liu T P, Ding G X, Wang X K, et al. Effect of planting density on the sink and source relationship of hybrid waxy sorghum[J]. Crops, 2016(1): 144-148.
[12]	刘秋霞, 董二伟, 黄晓磊, 等. 不同生态区高粱籽粒产量和品质对氮肥施用的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(10): 2766-2776.
	Liu Q X, Dong E W, Huang Xiaolei, et al. Response of sorghum grain yield and quality to nitrogen application in different ecozones[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(10): 2766-2776.
[13]	仪治本, 梁小红, 吕慧卿, 等. 高粱育种中穗粒数作用的研究[J]. 山西农业科学, 1998, 26(1): 27-29.
	Yi Z B, Liang X H, Lu H Q, et al. Studies on the role of kernels per head in sorghum breeding[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 1998, 26(1): 27-29.
[14]	江又舟, 李凤英. 甜高粱主要性状遗传力和相关性的初步研究[J]. 吉林农业科学, 1990(4): 14-16.
	Jiang Y Z, Li F Y. Preliminary study on heritability and correlation of main characters of sweet sorghum[J]. Journal of Jilin Agricultural Sciences, 1990(4): 14-16.
[15]	王媛, 王劲松, 董二伟, 等. 施氮量对高粱籽粒灌浆及淀粉累积的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(7): 1968-1978.
	Wang Y, Wang J S, Dong E W, et al. Effect of nitrogen application level on grain starch accumulation at grain filling stage in sorghum spikelets[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(7): 1968-1978.
[16]	卢庆善. 高粱学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1999.
[17]	高士杰. 高粱产量性状的基因效应分析[J]. 遗传, 1993, 15(2): 25-27.
	Gao S J. Analysis of gene effect on yield characters in sorghum[J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 1993, 15(2): 25-27.
[18]	Gebeyehou G, Knott D R, Baker R J. Rate and duration of grain filling in durum wheat cultivars[J]. Crop Science, 1982, 22(2): 337-340.
[19]	Bruckner P L, Frohberg R C. Rate and duration of grain fill in spring wheat[J]. Crop Science, 1987, 27(3): 451-455.
[20]	Darroch B A, Baker R J. Grain filling in three spring wheat genotypes: statistical analysis[J]. Crop Science, 1990, 30(3): 525-529.
[21]	Heiniger R W, Vanderlip R L, Kofoid K D. Caryopsis weight patterns within the sorghum panicle[J]. Crop Science, 1993, 33(3): 543-549.
[22]	Wang G L, Kang M S, Moreno O. Genetic analyses of grain-filling rate and duration in maize[J]. Field Crops Research, 1999, 61(3): 211-222.
[23]	Paterson A H, Bowers J E, Bruggmann R, et al. The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses[J]. Nature, 2009, 457(7229): 551-556.
[24]	Shang L G, He W C, Wang T Y, et al. A complete assembly of the rice Nipponbare reference genome[J]. Molecular Plant, 2023, 16(8): 1232-1236.
[25]	Chen J, Wang Z J, Tan K W, et al. A complete telomere-to-telomere assembly of the maize genome[J]. Nature Genetics, 2023, 55(7): 1221-1231.
[26]	Wang Z J, Miao L F, Tan K W, et al. Near-complete assembly and comprehensive annotation of the wheat Chinese Spring genome[J]. Molecular Plant, 2025, 18(5): 892-907.
[27]	Zhang J S, Qi Y Y, Hua X T, et al. The highly allo-autopolyploid modern sugarcane genome and very recent allopolyploidization in Saccharum[J]. Nature Genetics, 2025, 57(1): 242-253.
[28]	Kamal N M, Gorafi Y S A, Tomemori H, et al. Genetic variation for grain nutritional profile and yield potential in sorghum and the possibility of selection for drought tolerance under irrigated conditions[J]. BMC Genomics, 2023, 24(1): 515.
[29]	Morris G P, Ramu P, Deshpande S P, et al. Population genomic and genome-wide association studies of agroclimatic traits in sorghum[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013, 110(2): 453-458.
[30]	Mace E S, Tai S S, Gilding E K, et al. Whole-genome sequencing reveals untapped genetic potential in Africa’s indigenous cereal crop sorghum[J]. Nature Communications, 2013, 4: 2320.
[31]	Mann J A, Kimber C T, Miller F R. The origin and early cultivation of sorghums in Africa[M]. Texas: Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, 1983.
[32]	SALGOTRA R K. Plant germplasm registration notice[J]. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2026, 39(1): 341-386.
[33]	Tao Y F, Mace E, George-Jaeggli B, et al. Novel grain weight loci revealed in a cross between cultivated and wild sorghum[J]. The Plant Genome, 2018, 11(2): 170089.
[34]	Harlan J R, de Wet J M J, Price E G. Comparative evolution of cereals[J]. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution, 1973, 27(2): 311-325.
[35]	Eriksson O. Game theory provides no explanation for seed size variation in grasslands[J]. Oecologia, 2005, 144(1): 98-105.
[36]	Lee W J, Pedersen J F, Shelton D R. Relationship of Sorghum kernel size to physiochemical, milling, pasting, and cooking properties[J]. Food Research International, 2002, 35(7): 643-649.
[37]	Kriegshauser T D, Tuinstra M R, Hancock J D. Variation in nutritional value of sorghum hybrids with contrasting seed weight characteristics and comparisons with maize in broiler chicks[J]. Crop Science, 2006, 46(2): 695-699.
[38]	卢庆善. 我国高粱杂种优势利用回顾与展望[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 1992(3): 40-44.
	Lu Q S. Review and prospect of heterosis utilization of sorghum in China[J]. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, 1992(3): 40-44.
[39]	侯杰, 周伟, 余忠浩, 等. 2017—2022年我国高粱品种主要性状变化趋势分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2024, 52(22): 112-122.
	Hou J, Zhou Wei, Yu Zhonghao, et al. Trend analysis of main traits of China’s sorghum varieties from 2017 to 2022[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 52(22): 112-122.
[40]	孙家国, 兰运财. 高粱高产栽培技术[J]. 现代农业科技, 2010(4): 114-114.
	Sun J G, Lan Y C. High-yield cultivation techniques of sorghum[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2010(4): 114-114.
[41]	Schnyder H, Baum U. Growth of the grain of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The relationship between water content and dry matter accumulation[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 1992, 1(2): 51-57.
[42]	Borrás L, Slafer G A, Otegui M E. Seed dry weight response to source-sink manipulations in wheat, maize and soybean: a quantitative reappraisal[J]. Field Crops Research, 2004, 86(2/3): 131-146.
[43]	Gambín B L, Borrás L. Sorghum kernel weight: growth patterns from different positions within the panicle[J]. Crop Science, 2005, 45(2): 553-561.
[44]	汤兰. 再生高粱不同播种期对头季产量及其他性状的影响[J]. 农业开发与装备, 2015(2): 120.
	Tang L. Effects of different sowing dates on yield and other characters of regenerated sorghum in the first season[J]. Agricultural Development & Equipments, 2015(2): 120.
[45]	Yang Z J, van Oosterom E J, Jordan D R, et al. Pre-anthesis ovary development determines genotypic differences in potential kernel weight in sorghum[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2009, 60(4): 1399-1408.
[46]	Zou G H, Zhai G W, Yan S, et al. Sorghum qTGW1a encodes a G-protein subunit and acts as a negative regulator of grain size[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2020, 71(18): 5389-5401.
[47]	程宝成, 刘巧英, 江宏. 高粱粒重的双列分析[J]. 遗传, 1989, 11(3): 12-14.
	Cheng B C, Liu Q Y, Jiang H. Analysis of diallel cross on grain weight of sorghum[J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 1989, 11(3): 12-14.
[48]	杨伟光, 韩立军, 牟金明, 等. 粒用高粱粒重的遗传研究[J]. 作物学报, 2001, 27(5): 627-632.
	Yang W G, Han L J, Mu J, et al. Genetic studies on the grain weight of grain sorghum[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2001, 27(5): 627-632.
[49]	杨伟光, 李殿申, 魏晓明, 等. 高粱产量构成因素的遗传模型测验[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 1995, 17 (4):1-6.
	Yang W G, Li D S, Wei X M, et al. Test on genetic models of yield component of sorghum[J]. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 1995, 17(4):1-6.
[50]	Paterson A H, Damon S, Hewitt J D, et al. Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations, and environments[J]. Genetics, 1991, 127(1): 181-197.
[51]	Tanksley S D. Mapping polygenes[J]. Annual Review of Genetics, 1993, 27: 205-233.
[52]	Pereira M G, Ahnert D, Lee M, et al. Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci for panicle characteristics and seed weight in sorghum[J]. Revista Brasileira de Genetica, 1995, 18(2): 249-257.
[53]	Paterson A H, Lin Y R, Li Z, et al. Convergent domestication of cereal crops by independent mutations at corresponding genetic Loci[J]. Science, 1995, 269(5231): 1714-1718.
[54]	Tuinstra M R, Grote E M, Goldsbrough P B, et al. Genetic analysis of post-flowering drought tolerance and components of grain development in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench[J]. Molecular Breeding, 1997, 3(6): 439-448.
[55]	Rami J F, Dufour P, Trouche G, et al. Quantitative trait loci for grain quality, productivity, morphological and agronomical traits in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1998, 97(4): 605-616.
[56]	Feltus F A, Hart G E, Schertz K F, et al. Alignment of genetic maps and QTLs between inter- and intra-specific sorghum populations[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2006, 112(7): 1295-1305.
[57]	Brown P J, Klein P E, Bortiri E, et al. Inheritance of inflorescence architecture in sorghum[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2006, 113(5): 931-942.
[58]	Murray S C, Sharma A, Rooney W L, et al. Genetic improvement of sorghum as a biofuel feedstock: I. QTL for stem sugar and grain nonstructural carbohydrates[J]. Crop Science, 2008, 48(6): 2165-2179.
[59]	Phuong N, Stützel H, Uptmoor R. Quantitative trait loci associated to agronomic traits and yield components in a Sorghum bicolor L. Moench RIL population cultivated under pre-flowering drought and well-watered conditions[J]. Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 4(12): 781-791.
[60]	Rajkumar, Fakrudin B, Kavil S P, et al. Molecular mapping of genomic regions harbouring QTLs for root and yield traits in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)[J]. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 2013, 19(3): 409-419.
[61]	Nagaraja Reddy R, Madhusudhana R, Murali Mohan S, et al. Mapping QTL for grain yield and other agronomic traits in post-rainy sorghum [Sorghum bicolor(L.) Moench[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2013, 126(8): 1921-1939.
[62]	Han L J, Chen J, Mace E S, et al. Fine mapping of qGW1, a major QTL for grain weight in sorghum[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2015, 128(9): 1813-1825.
[63]	Shehzad T, Okuno K. QTL mapping for yield and yield-contributing traits in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor(L.) Moench) with genome-based SSR markers[J]. Euphytica, 2015, 203(1): 17-31.
[64]	Mocoeur A, Zhang Y M, Liu Z Q, et al. Stability and genetic control of morphological, biomass and biofuel traits under temperate maritime and continental conditions in sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolour)[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2015, 128(9): 1685-1701.
[65]	Spagnolli F C, Mace E, Jordan D, et al. Quantitative trait loci of plant attributes related to sorghum grain number determination[J]. Crop Science, 2016, 56(6): 3046-3054.
[66]	Gelli M, Mitchell S E, Liu K, et al. Mapping QTLs and association of differentially expressed gene transcripts for multiple agronomic traits under different nitrogen levels in sorghum[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2016, 16(1): 16.
[67]	Sukumaran S, Li X, Li X R, et al. QTL mapping for grain yield, flowering time, and stay-green traits in sorghum with genotyping-by-sequencing markers[J]. Crop Science, 2016, 56(4): 1429-1442.
[68]	Boyles R E, Pfeiffer B K, Cooper E A, et al. Quantitative trait loci mapping of agronomic and yield traits in two grain sorghum biparental families[J]. Crop Science, 2017, 57(5): 2443-2456.
[69]	Bai C M, Wang C Y, Wang P, et al. QTL mapping of agronomically important traits in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)[J]. Euphytica, 2017, 213(12): 285.
[70]	Guindo D, Teme N, Vaksmann M, et al. Quantitative trait loci for sorghum grain morphology and quality traits: Toward breeding for a traditional food preparation of West-Africa[J]. Journal of Cereal Science, 2019, 85: 256-272.
[71]	Liu H H, Liu H Q, Zhou L N, et al. Genetic Architecture of domestication- and improvement-related traits using a population derived from Sorghum virgatum and Sorghum bicolor[J]. Plant Science, 2019, 283: 135-146.
[72]	Cao N, Ding Y Q, Xu J X, et al. QTL analysis of sorghum grain traits based on high-density genetic map[J]. Journal of Applied Genetics, 2025, 66(3): 557-567.
[73]	Wang J, Zhang X, Lin Z W. QTL mapping in a maize F₂ population using Genotyping-by-Sequencing and a modified fine-mapping strategy[J]. Plant Science, 2018, 276: 171-180.
[74]	Upadhyaya H D, Wang Y H, Sharma S, et al. SSR markers linked to kernel weight and tiller number in sorghum identified by association mapping[J]. Euphytica, 2012, 187(3): 401-410.
[75]	Boyles R E, Cooper E A, Myers M T, et al. Genome-wide association studies of grain yield components in diverse sorghum germplasm[J]. The Plant Genome, 2016, 9(2): plantgenome2015.09.0091.
[76]	Wang J N, Hu Z B, Upadhyaya H D, et al. Genomic signatures of seed mass adaptation to global precipitation gradients in sorghum[J]. Heredity, 2020, 124(1): 108-121.
[77]	Tao Y F, Zhao X R, Wang X M, et al. Large-scale GWAS in sorghum reveals common genetic control of grain size among cereals[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2020, 18(4): 1093-1105.
[78]	Tao Y F, Trusov Y, Zhao X R, et al. Manipulating assimilate availability provides insight into the genes controlling grain size in sorghum[J]. The Plant Journal, 2021, 108(1): 231-243.
[79]	邹桂花, 丁延庆, 徐建霞, 等. 高粱千粒重全基因组关联分析和候选基因预测[J]. 核农学报, 2022, 36(11): 2124-2136.
	Zou G H, Ding Y Q, Xu J X, et al. Genome-wide association analysis of thousand grain weight and candidate gene prediction in a sorghum sequenced association panel[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 36(11): 2124-2136.
[80]	韩立杰. 高粱粒重的QTL分析及qGW1的精细定位[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2016.
	Han L J. QTL analysis of grain weight and fine mapping of qGW1 in sorghum(Sorghum bicolor L.)[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2016.
[81]	Boyles R E, Pfeiffer B K, Cooper E A, et al. Genetic dissection of sorghum grain quality traits using diverse and segregating populations[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2017, 130(4): 697-716.
[82]	Yu J P, Xiong H Y, Zhu X Y, et al. OsLG3 contributing to rice grain length and yield was mined by Ho-LAMap[J]. BMC Biology, 2017, 15(1): 28.
[83]	Wei C Z, Gao L, Xiao R X, et al. Complete telomere-to-telomere assemblies of two sorghum genomes to guide biological discovery[J]. iMeta, 2024, 3(2): e193.
[84]	Deng Y, Zhou P, Li F, et al. A complete assembly of the sorghum BTx623 reference genome[J]. Plant Communications, 2024, 5(6): 100977.
[85]	Chen C X, Ge F Y, Du H L, et al. A comprehensive omics resource and genetic tools for functional genomics research and genetic improvement of sorghum[J]. Molecular Plant, 2025, 18(4): 703-719.
[86]	Hu Z J, Lu S J, Wang M J, et al. A novel QTL qTGW3 encodes the GSK3/SHAGGY-like kinase OsGSK5/OsSK41 that interacts with OsARF4 to negatively regulate grain size and weight in rice[J]. Molecular Plant, 2018, 11(5): 736-749.
[87]	Segami S, Takehara K, Yamamoto T, et al. Overexpression of SRS5 improves grain size of brassinosteroid-related dwarf mutants in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Breeding Science, 2017, 67(4): 393-397.
[88]	Zhu X J, Zhang S Z, Chen Y P, et al. Decreased grain size1, a C₃HC₄-type RING protein, influences grain size in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Plant Molecular Biology, 2021, 105(4): 405-417.
[89]	Qi P, Lin Y S, Song X J, et al. The novel quantitative trait locus GL3.1 controls rice grain size and yield by regulating Cyclin-T1;3[J]. Cell Research, 2012, 22(12): 1666-1680.
[90]	Tao Y J, Miao J, Wang J, et al. RGG1, involved in the cytokinin regulatory pathway, controls grain size in rice[J]. Rice, 2020, 13(1): 76.
[91]	Liu K, Wang X, Liu H C, et al. OsAT1, an anion transporter, negatively regulates grain size and yield in rice[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 2022, 174(3): e13692.
[92]	Fan C C, Xing Y Z, Mao H L, et al. GS3, a major QTL for grain length and weight and minor QTL for grain width and thickness in rice, encodes a putative transmembrane protein[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2006, 112(6): 1164-1171.
[93]	Liu L C, Tong H N, Xiao Y H, et al. Activation of Big Grain1 significantly improves grain size by regulating auxin transport in rice[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112(35): 11102-11107.
[94]	Nakagawa H, Tanaka A, Tanabata T, et al. Short grain1 decreases organ elongation and brassinosteroid response in rice[J]. Plant Physiology, 2012, 158(3): 1208-1219.
[95]	Wang Y X, Xiong G S, Hu J, et al. Copy number variation at the GL7 locus contributes to grain size diversity in rice[J]. Nature Genetics, 2015, 47(8): 944-948.
[96]	Du H Y, Yong R, Zhang J Q, et al. OsBAK2/OsSERK2 expression is repressed by OsBZR1 to modulate brassinosteroid response and grain length in rice[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2023, 74(17): 4978-4993.
[97]	Fang N, Xu R, Huang L J, et al. SMALL GRAIN 11 controls grain size, grain number and grain yield in rice[J]. Rice, 2016, 9(1): 64.
[98]	Choi B S, Kim Y J, Markkandan K, et al. GW2 functions as an E3 ubiquitin ligase for rice expansin-like 1[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2018, 19(7): 1904.
[99]	Chen Y L, Luo L L, Xu F F, et al. Carbohydrate repartitioning in the rice starch branching enzyme IIb mutant stimulates higher resistant starch content and lower seed weight revealed by multiomics analysis[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2022, 70(31): 9802-9816.
[100]	Abbas W, Shalmani A, Zhang J, et al. The GW5-WRKY53- SGW5 module regulates grain size variation in rice[J]. New Phytologist, 2024, 242(5): 2011-2025.
[101]	Hu J, Wang Y X, Fang Y X, et al. A rare allele of GS2 enhances grain size and grain yield in rice[J]. Molecular Plant, 2015, 8(10): 1455-1465.
[102]	Wang F X, Lin J X, Yang F, et al. The OsMAPK5-OsWRKY72 module negatively regulates grain length and grain weight in rice[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2024, 66(12): 2648-2663.
[103]	Zhu X L, Liang W Q, Cui X, et al. Brassinosteroids promote development of rice pollen grains and seeds by triggering expression of Carbon Starved Anther, a MYB domain protein[J]. The Plant Journal, 2015, 82(4): 570-581.
[104]	Zhao Y F, Zhang X F, Cheng Y, et al. The miR167-OsARF12 module regulates rice grain filling and grain size downstream of miR159[J]. Plant Communications, 2023, 4(5): 100604.
[105]	Wang S K, Wu K, Yuan Q B, et al. Control of grain size, shape and quality by OsSPL16 in rice[J]. Nature Genetics, 2012, 44(8): 950-954.
[106]	Qing D J, Chen W W, Huang S S, et al. Editing of rice (Oryza sativa L.) OsMKK3 gene using CRISPR/Cas9 decreases grain length by modulating the expression of photosystem components[J]. Proteomics, 2023, 23(18): e2200538.
[107]	Wu D X, Cao Y N, Wang D J, et al. Auxin receptor OsTIR1 mediates auxin signaling during seed filling in rice[J]. Plant Physiology, 2024, 194(4): 2434-2448.
[108]	Ngangkham U, Nath M, Dokku P, et al. An EMS-induced new sequence variant, TEMS5032 in the coding region of SRS3 gene leads to shorter grain length in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Journal of Applied Genetics, 2018, 59(4): 377-389.
[109]	Li Y B, Fan C C, Xing Y Z, et al. Natural variation in GS5 plays an important role in regulating grain size and yield in rice[J]. Nature Genetics, 2011, 43(12): 1266-1269.
[110]	Yan S, Zou G H, Li S J, et al. Seed size is determined by the combinations of the genes controlling different seed characteristics in rice[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2011, 123(7): 1173-1181.
[111]	Wang Y Y, Lv Y, Yu H P, et al. GR5 acts in the G protein pathway to regulate grain size in rice[J]. Plant Communications, 2024, 5(1): 100673.
[112]	Xu R, Duan P G, Yu H Y, et al. Control of grain size and weight by the OsMKKK10-OsMKK4-OsMAPK6 signaling pathway in rice[J]. Molecular Plant, 2018, 11(6): 860-873.
[113]	Li J, Chu H W, Zhang Y H, et al. The rice HGW gene encodes a ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domain protein that regulates heading date and grain weight[J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(3): e34231.
[114]	Shi C L, Dong N Q, Guo T, et al. A quantitative trait locus GW6 controls rice grain size and yield through the gibberellin pathway[J]. The Plant Journal, 2020, 103(3): 1174-1188.

参考文献 Reference	位点数量 Loci number	标记数量 Marker number	标记类型 Marker type	关联分析模型 Association analysis model	群体 Population
[74]	1	98	SSR	—	242个本地高粱品种 242 local sorghum varieties
[75]	6	268 830	SNP	MLM/BSLMM	390个自然高粱品种 390 natural sorghum varieties
[76]	29	404 627	SNP	GLM	89个高粱品种 89 sorghum varieties
[76]	56	404 627	SNP	MLM	89个高粱品种 89 sorghum varieties
[77]	67	111 089/31 478	SNP	a linear mixed model	837个自然高粱品种和1 421个BC-NAM高粱群体 837 natural sorghum varieties and 1 421 BC-NAM sorghum populations
[78]	80	111 089/31 478	SNP	a linear mixed model	837个自然高粱品种和1 421个BC-NAM高粱群体 837 natural sorghum varieties and 1 421 BC-NAM sorghum populations
[79]	96	2 015 850	SNP	mrMLM/FASTmrMLM/FASTmrEMMA/ISIS/EM-BLASSO/pLARmEB/pKWmEB	242个高粱品种 242 sorghum varieties

参考文献 Reference	位点数量 Loci number	标记数量 Marker number	标记类型 Marker type	关联分析模型 Association analysis model	群体 Population
[74]	1	98	SSR	—	242个本地高粱品种 242 local sorghum varieties
[75]	6	268 830	SNP	MLM/BSLMM	390个自然高粱品种 390 natural sorghum varieties
[76]	29	404 627	SNP	GLM	89个高粱品种 89 sorghum varieties
[76]	56	404 627	SNP	MLM	89个高粱品种 89 sorghum varieties
[77]	67	111 089/31 478	SNP	a linear mixed model	837个自然高粱品种和1 421个BC-NAM高粱群体 837 natural sorghum varieties and 1 421 BC-NAM sorghum populations
[78]	80	111 089/31 478	SNP	a linear mixed model	837个自然高粱品种和1 421个BC-NAM高粱群体 837 natural sorghum varieties and 1 421 BC-NAM sorghum populations
[79]	96	2 015 850	SNP	mrMLM/FASTmrMLM/FASTmrEMMA/ISIS/EM-BLASSO/pLARmEB/pKWmEB	242个高粱品种 242 sorghum varieties

来源基因 Source gene	同源基因 Homologous gene	同源基因位置 Position of homologous gene	粒重QTL Grain weight QTL	QTL位置 QTL position	参考文献 Reference
OsGSK5	Sobic.001G018100	1:1526527-1531907	QGWGT1.31	1:0-11463167	[86]
SRS5	Sobic.001G107100	1:8265619-8268721	QGWGT1.28	1:260000-9840000	[87]
			QGWGT1.27	1:780000-1940000
DGS1	Sobic.001G121200	1:9433305-9441261	QGWGT1.27	1:780000-1940000	[88]
GL3.1	Sobic.001G154900	1:12437579-12447250	QGWGT1.4	1:10808628-12982009	[89]
			qYLD1.2	1:11145830-12704841
			qYLD1.3	1:11203256-21602500
			QKWGT1.8	1:12436290
RGG1	Sobic.001G161000	1:13238413-13242079	qYLD1.3	1:11203256-21602500	[90]
OsAT1	Sobic.001G271600	1:52499596-52501646	QGWGT1.9	1:51823788-65474914	[91]
GS3	Sobic.001G341700	1:62910778-62916258	QGWGT1.29	1:61890000-77280000	[92]
			QKWGT1.17	1:62888113-62968722
BG1	Sobic.001G485400	1:75624274-75627243	QGWGT1.12	1:71965168-77582447	[93]
SG1	Sobic.002G226500	2:61857256-61859003	QGWGT2.12	2:59130000-66620000	[94]
GLW7	Sobic.002G312200	2:68569337-68574778	QGWGT2.3	2:65754949-71022249	[95]
			QGWGT2.14	2:65837295-70940526
BZR1	Sobic.002G353200	2:71635213-71637226	QGWGT2.7	2:71564234-74563028	[96]
			qtnTWG2.13	2:71544277
D2	Sobic.003G030600	3:2718023-2725425	QGWGT3.10	3:0-5851245	[97]
GW2	Sobic.004G107300	4:10267537-10272971	QGWGT4.12	4:6655479-12224503	[98]
BE2b	Sobic.004G163700	4:51292091-51304326	qYLD4.1	4:45937548-62339532	[99]
			QGWGT4.16	4:50223794-52216695
			QGWGT4.6	4:50887295-53413703
SGW5	Sobic.004G171200	4:52371177-52375024	qYLD4.1	4:45937548-62339532	[100]
			QGWGT4.6	4:50887295-53413703
			QKWGT4.25	4:51365107-52404329
			QKWGT4.34	4:51365107-53259052
GS2/GL2	Sobic.004G269900	4:61416646-61421827	qYLD4.1	4:45937548-62339532	[101]
			QGWGT4.17	4:52871698-61582251
OsWRKY72	Sobic.005G117400	5:51657059-51660442	QGWGT5.6	5:12411046-60727257	[102]
			QKWGT5.5	5:48635151-58856142
D11	Sobic.006G114600	6:48245594-48250231	QGWGT6.15	6:45450000-51890000	[103]
			QGWGT6.16	6:46407894-52506606
			QGWGT6.4	6:46511902-49500245
			QGWGT6.6	6:46622256-50466291
			QGWGT6.5	6:47082043-48527680
OsARF12	Sobic.006G262100	6:59708060-59715686	QGWGT6.11	6:56538055-61260478	[104]
			QKWGT6.14	6:59304932-59994056
GW8	Sobic.007G193500	7:62605970-62612183	QGWGT7.10	7:61791273-65000000	[105]
OsMKK3	Sobic.007G105100	7:37237893-37255776	q2005GW7.2	7:10970531-53856861	[106]
OsTIR1	Sobic.009G045300	9:4314484-4320455	QGWGT9.2	9:2966741-47755859	[107]
SRS3	Sobic.009G049400	9:4902296-4908926	QGWGT9.2	9:2966741-47755859	[108]
GS5	Sobic.009G053600	9:5403632-5408821	QGWGT9.2	9:2966741-47755859	[109]
GW5	Sobic.009G070000	9:8184499-8186318	QGWGT9.2	9:2966741-47755859	[110]
			QGWGT9.3	9:8157521-47753538
WRKY53	Sobic.009G100500	9:39826392-39831148	QGWGT9.2	9:2966741-47755859	[100]
			QGWGT9.3	9:8157521-47753538
GR5	Sobic.009G124200	9:47743017-47750375	QGWGT9.2	9:2966741-47755859	[111]
			QGWGT9.3	9:8157521-47753538
MAPK6	Sobic.010G043200	10:3339727-3345825	QGWGT10.1	10:2893458-7608044	[112]
			QGWGT10.6	10:1345446-8699113
			QKWGT10.9	10:2875254-5478495
HGW	Sobic.010G047400	10:3668201-3673695	QGWGT10.1	10:2893458-7608044	[113]
			QGWGT10.6	10:1345446-8699113
			QKWGT10.9	10:2875254-5478495
GW6	Sobic.010G210100	10:55370340-55372973	q2004GW10.2	10:54624154-55856900	[114]

来源基因 Source gene	同源基因 Homologous gene	同源基因位置 Position of homologous gene	粒重QTL Grain weight QTL	QTL位置 QTL position	参考文献 Reference
OsGSK5	Sobic.001G018100	1:1526527-1531907	QGWGT1.31	1:0-11463167	[86]
SRS5	Sobic.001G107100	1:8265619-8268721	QGWGT1.28	1:260000-9840000	[87]
			QGWGT1.27	1:780000-1940000
DGS1	Sobic.001G121200	1:9433305-9441261	QGWGT1.27	1:780000-1940000	[88]
GL3.1	Sobic.001G154900	1:12437579-12447250	QGWGT1.4	1:10808628-12982009	[89]
			qYLD1.2	1:11145830-12704841
			qYLD1.3	1:11203256-21602500
			QKWGT1.8	1:12436290
RGG1	Sobic.001G161000	1:13238413-13242079	qYLD1.3	1:11203256-21602500	[90]
OsAT1	Sobic.001G271600	1:52499596-52501646	QGWGT1.9	1:51823788-65474914	[91]
GS3	Sobic.001G341700	1:62910778-62916258	QGWGT1.29	1:61890000-77280000	[92]
			QKWGT1.17	1:62888113-62968722
BG1	Sobic.001G485400	1:75624274-75627243	QGWGT1.12	1:71965168-77582447	[93]
SG1	Sobic.002G226500	2:61857256-61859003	QGWGT2.12	2:59130000-66620000	[94]
GLW7	Sobic.002G312200	2:68569337-68574778	QGWGT2.3	2:65754949-71022249	[95]
			QGWGT2.14	2:65837295-70940526
BZR1	Sobic.002G353200	2:71635213-71637226	QGWGT2.7	2:71564234-74563028	[96]
			qtnTWG2.13	2:71544277
D2	Sobic.003G030600	3:2718023-2725425	QGWGT3.10	3:0-5851245	[97]
GW2	Sobic.004G107300	4:10267537-10272971	QGWGT4.12	4:6655479-12224503	[98]
BE2b	Sobic.004G163700	4:51292091-51304326	qYLD4.1	4:45937548-62339532	[99]
			QGWGT4.16	4:50223794-52216695
			QGWGT4.6	4:50887295-53413703
SGW5	Sobic.004G171200	4:52371177-52375024	qYLD4.1	4:45937548-62339532	[100]
			QGWGT4.6	4:50887295-53413703
			QKWGT4.25	4:51365107-52404329
			QKWGT4.34	4:51365107-53259052
GS2/GL2	Sobic.004G269900	4:61416646-61421827	qYLD4.1	4:45937548-62339532	[101]
			QGWGT4.17	4:52871698-61582251
OsWRKY72	Sobic.005G117400	5:51657059-51660442	QGWGT5.6	5:12411046-60727257	[102]
			QKWGT5.5	5:48635151-58856142
D11	Sobic.006G114600	6:48245594-48250231	QGWGT6.15	6:45450000-51890000	[103]
			QGWGT6.16	6:46407894-52506606
			QGWGT6.4	6:46511902-49500245
			QGWGT6.6	6:46622256-50466291
			QGWGT6.5	6:47082043-48527680
OsARF12	Sobic.006G262100	6:59708060-59715686	QGWGT6.11	6:56538055-61260478	[104]
			QKWGT6.14	6:59304932-59994056
GW8	Sobic.007G193500	7:62605970-62612183	QGWGT7.10	7:61791273-65000000	[105]
OsMKK3	Sobic.007G105100	7:37237893-37255776	q2005GW7.2	7:10970531-53856861	[106]
OsTIR1	Sobic.009G045300	9:4314484-4320455	QGWGT9.2	9:2966741-47755859	[107]
SRS3	Sobic.009G049400	9:4902296-4908926	QGWGT9.2	9:2966741-47755859	[108]
GS5	Sobic.009G053600	9:5403632-5408821	QGWGT9.2	9:2966741-47755859	[109]
GW5	Sobic.009G070000	9:8184499-8186318	QGWGT9.2	9:2966741-47755859	[110]
			QGWGT9.3	9:8157521-47753538
WRKY53	Sobic.009G100500	9:39826392-39831148	QGWGT9.2	9:2966741-47755859	[100]
			QGWGT9.3	9:8157521-47753538
GR5	Sobic.009G124200	9:47743017-47750375	QGWGT9.2	9:2966741-47755859	[111]
			QGWGT9.3	9:8157521-47753538
MAPK6	Sobic.010G043200	10:3339727-3345825	QGWGT10.1	10:2893458-7608044	[112]
			QGWGT10.6	10:1345446-8699113
			QKWGT10.9	10:2875254-5478495
HGW	Sobic.010G047400	10:3668201-3673695	QGWGT10.1	10:2893458-7608044	[113]
			QGWGT10.6	10:1345446-8699113
			QKWGT10.9	10:2875254-5478495
GW6	Sobic.010G210100	10:55370340-55372973	q2004GW10.2	10:54624154-55856900	[114]

高粱粒重研究进展

Research progress on sorghum grain weight

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 114

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

参考文献 Reference	粒重QTL数量 Number of grain weight QTLs	亲本 Parents	作图群体 Mapping population	连锁群体大小 Population size	连锁群数量 Number of linkage groups	作图标记 Molecular markers
[52]	3	CK60/PI229828	F₂	152	10	RFLP
[53]	6	BTx623/S.propinquum	F₂	370	11	RFLP
[54]	7	Tx7078/B35	RIL	98	17	RAPD/ RFLP
[55]	4	IS2807/379	RIL	110	10	Probes/ morphological
[56]	7	BTx623/S.propinquum	F₂	370	10	SSR/RFLP
[56]	4	BTx623/IS3620C	RIL	137	10	SSR/RFLP
[57]	4	BTx623/IS3620C	RIL	119	10	SSR/RFLP
[58]	3	BTx623/Rio	RIL	176	10	SSR/AFLP
[59]	2	IS2449/IS1488	RIL	100	17	DArT
[60]	4	E36-1/SPV570	RIL	104	10	SSR/SNP
[61]	8	M35-1/B35	RIL	245	10	SSR
[62]	6	SA2313/Hiro-1	F₂	94	10	SSR
[62]	1	ATx623/SA2313	F₂	72	10	SSR
[62]	1	K-385/SA2313	F₂	109	10	SSR
[63]	9	Red Kafir/Takakibi	F_2:3	149	10	SSR
[64]	6	E-Tian/Ji2731	RIL	209	10	PAV/SSR
[65]	9	IS8525/R931945-2-2	RIL	146	10	SNP
[66]	2	CK60/China17	RIL	131	10	SNP
[67]	4	Tx436/00MN7645	RIL	188	10	SNP
[68]	5	BTx642/BTxARG-1	RIL	279	10	breakpoints
[68]	3	BTxARG-1/PI656056	RIL	191	10	breakpoints
[69]	2	BTx623/Rio	RIL	189	10	SSR/INDEL
[33]	12	R931945-2-2/S.bicolor subsp. verticilliflorum	BC₁F₅	200	10	SNP
[70]	4	P114	F₄	382	10	SNP
[70]	3	P118	F₄	400	10	SNP
[71]	3	Tx623/S.virgatum	F₃	272	10	SSR
[46]	9	654/LTR108	RIL	244	10	SNP
[72]	8	BTx623/Hongyingzi	RIL	205	10	SNP

[1]	张玉, 陈晶晶, 温联好, 杨振翼, 杨曾华, 童译, 王超. 绣球博大蓝叶斑病病原菌的分离鉴定与防治[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(4): 696-706.
[2]	吴勇, 徐再萌, 鲁晨妮, 朱玉祥, 朱日清, 孙达, 石艳平, 陈贵. 浙北地区主要类型水稻土上常规粳稻磷吸收利用特性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(3): 417-427.
[3]	麻慧芳, 王娟菲, 薛红丽, 任果香, 史关燕. 杂交谷子新品系产量与表型性状的遗传分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(3): 428-439.
[4]	程征铭, 俞孙洁, 张亮. 微塑料对费氏中华根瘤菌生理生化特性及其活化土壤难溶性磷能力的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(2): 317-326.
[5]	沈国强, 汪明德, 关雅文, 武军, 王汉荣. 高粱弯孢叶斑病病原菌鉴定、生物学特性研究及防治药剂筛选[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(7): 1492-1500.
[6]	何国欣, 李素娟, 王剑, 陶晓园, 叶子弘, 陈光, 徐盛春. 大豆种质苗期低氮耐性筛选和鉴定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(5): 965-976.
[7]	刘思彤, 侯宇, 潘家荃, 周桦楠, 崔亮, 万博, 于涛. 甘薯对低温胁迫的生理响应及耐寒性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(4): 767-778.
[8]	任元龙, 马蓉, 王晓卓, 张雪艳. 叶面喷施褪黑素对甘蓝幼苗干旱胁迫的缓解作用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(2): 338-348.
[9]	杨晓雨, 马指挥, 魏青, 牛志鹏, 陈安琪, 胡正冲, 王林生. 一个小麦芒长基因的初步定位及候选基因预测[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(1): 14-23.
[10]	吴国江, 周伟, 李艳肖, 侯杰, 杨志强, 周亚星. 高粱ZF-HD基因家族鉴定与盐碱胁迫下的表达分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(6): 1217-1231.
[11]	贺宇杉, 朱海霞. 梨黑孢链格孢GD-011菌株除草机制的初步研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(5): 1094-1101.
[12]	蔡诗怡, 虞慧芳, 王建升, 祝彪, 沈钰森, 顾宏辉, 盛小光. 花椰菜“坐球高度”性状的主基因+多基因遗传分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(3): 527-533.
[13]	田晓明, 向光锋, 牟村, 吕浩, 马涛, 朱路, 彭静, 张敏, 何艳. 四种红豆属植物耐旱性综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 308-324.
[14]	张雅茹, 颉建明, 张婧, 杨旭珍, 吴志国. 叶面喷施纳米铁对菠菜生长及品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(12): 2696-2704.
[15]	张思懿, 崔博文, 王佳玲, 蔺吉祥, 杨青杰. 非生物胁迫下植物根系的生理与分子响应研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(10): 2391-2401.