›› 2013, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (6): 0-1363.

• 食品科学 •    

克仑特罗CLEIA试剂盒与ELISA试剂盒的比较分析

何方洋2,方华林2,罗晓琴1,冯月君1,张德红1,韩京朋1

  

  1. 1北京勤邦生物技术有限公司,北京 102206;2遵义县苟江镇农业服务中心,贵州 遵义 563101
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2013-11-25 发布日期:2013-11-25

Comparative analysis with clenbuterol CLEIA kit and ELISA kit

HE Fang\|yang;FANG Hua\|lin;LUO Xiao\|qin;FENG Yue\|jun;ZhANG De\|hong;HAN Jing\|peng   

  1. 1Beijing Kwinbon Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing 102206, China;2Agricultural Service Center of Goujiang Town, Zunyi County, Guizhou Province, Zunyi 563101,China
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2013-11-25 Published:2013-11-25

摘要: 用研发的克仑特罗化学发光酶联免疫(CLEIA)试剂盒与克仑特罗酶联免疫(ELISA)试剂盒进行检测效果比对,结果显示,CLEIA试剂盒检测时间为33 min,而ELISA试剂盒则需要50 min,CLEIA试剂盒方法要比ELISA试剂盒方法更节省时间;CLEIA试剂盒IC50为400 ng·L-1,对猪尿和猪肉的最低检测限分别为201 ng·L-1和907 ng·kg-1,而ELISA试剂盒IC50则为1252 ng·L-1,对猪尿和猪肉的最低检测限分别为235 ng·L-1和993 ng·kg-1,CLEIA试剂盒方法的灵敏度要高于ELISA试剂盒方法的灵敏度。综合分析得知:CLEIA法比ELISA法灵敏度更高、反应时间更短。

关键词: 克仑特罗, 化学发光酶联免疫, 酶联免疫

Abstract: A comparative analysis with clenbuterol chemiluminescence enzyme\|linked immunoassay(CLEIA) kit and clenbuterol enzyme\|linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA) kit was used to determined the clenbuterol contents in samples of porcine urine and pork. The results showed that the testing time of the CLEIA kit was 33 min, and that of the ELISA kit was about 50 min, so the CLEIA kit cost less time than ELISA kit. The IC50 of the CLEIA kit was 400 ng·L-1, and the limit of detection for urine and pork were 201 ng·L-1 and 907 ng·kg-1, respectively, and the homologous parameters of ELISA kit were 1252 ng·L-1, 235 ng·L-1and 993 ng·kg-1, so the sensibility of CLEIA method was better than ELISA method. In summary, the CLEIA method was more sensitive and cost less time than ELISA method.

Key words: clenbuterol, chemiluminescence enzyme\|linked immunoassay, enzyme\|linked immunosorbent assay