农村宅基地产权权能拓展与规范研究——基于浙江义乌宅基地“三权分置”的改革实践

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2018.11.22

浙江农业学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11): 1972-1980.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2018.11.22

• 农业经济与发展 • 上一篇

农村宅基地产权权能拓展与规范研究——基于浙江义乌宅基地“三权分置”的改革实践

朱明芬

杭州行政学院市情研究所,浙江杭州 310024

收稿日期:2018-06-22 出版日期:2018-11-25 发布日期:2018-12-21
作者简介:朱明芬(1961—),女,四川阆中人,硕士,研究员,研究方向为农村经济。E-mail: zhumf@hzswdx.gov.cn
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金(17BJY094)

Research on rural housing land property right power development and specification: based on reform practice of rural housing land ‘three rights separations’ in Yiwu, Zhejiang

ZHU Mingfen

Hangzhou Research Institute, Hangzhou Administration Institute, Hangzhou 310024, China

Received:2018-06-22 Online:2018-11-25 Published:2018-12-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 作为全国33个农村土地改革试点县之一,义乌市率先探索农村宅基地改革“三权分置”路径,其实质是拓展宅基地的产权权能。通过落实农村集体所有权、保障集体经济组织成员资格权、适度放活宅基地使用权,极大地拓展了宅基地所有权、占有权、处置权、收益权等权利、权能。但是,也存在权能拓展不充分与权力运行失范的双重困惑,需要细分宅基地“三权权属”,加快相关法律衔接,规避“适度放活”风险。

关键词: 宅基地, 权能拓展, 规范运行

Abstract: As one of 33 national countryside land reform experimental counties, Yiwu explored the rural housing land “three powers separations” reform to develop the property right power of rural housing land. By carrying out the countryside collective ownership, safeguarding the member qualifications power in collective economy organizations, and releasing moderately from unnecessary constraints on the use of rural housing land right, the reform has enormously developed the powers and functions of rural housing landownership, possession, disposal and usufruct. However, double confusions existed as insufficient power development and the power operation anomie. Measures should be taken on subdividing the rural housing land “three powers ownership”, speeding up the related legal engagement and avoiding risk from “moderately releasing”.

Key words: rural housing land, powers and functions development, standard operation

中图分类号:

S-9
F321.32

朱明芬. 农村宅基地产权权能拓展与规范研究——基于浙江义乌宅基地“三权分置”的改革实践[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(11): 1972-1980.

ZHU Mingfen. Research on rural housing land property right power development and specification: based on reform practice of rural housing land ‘three rights separations’ in Yiwu, Zhejiang[J]. , 2018, 30(11): 1972-1980.

参考文献

[1] 新华社. 关于实施乡村振兴战略的意见2018年中央一号文件公布全面部署实施乡村振兴战略[EB/OL]. (2018-02-04) [2018-06-22]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2018-02/04/content_5263760.htm.
[2] 董祚继. “三权分置”:农村宅基地制度的重大创新[EB/OL]. (2018-03-06) [2018-06-22]. http://www.csote.org/n12174177/n12334275/17976196.html.
[3] 刘守英. 宅基地“三权分置”改革影响几何?[J]. 时事报告, 2018 (3): 45.
LIU S Y.What is the influence of rural housing land “three rights separations” reform?[J]. Shishi Baogao, 2018 (3): 45. (in Chinese)
[4] 陈彬. 农村宅基地制度改革的实践及问题分析:基于浙江省义乌市的实践[J]. 中国土地, 2017 (8): 4-7.
CHEN B.Practices and problems of rural housing land reform: case study of Yiwu City, Zhejiang Province[J]. China Land, 2017 (8): 4-7. (in Chinese)
[5] 杨丽霞, 朱从谋, 苑韶峰, 等. 基于供给侧改革的农户宅基地退出意愿及福利变化分析:以浙江省义乌市为例[J]. 中国土地科学, 2018, 32(1): 35-41
YANG L X, ZHU C M, YUAN S F, et al.Analysis on farmers' willingness to rural residential land exit and welfare change based on the supply-side reform: a case of Yiwu City in Zhejiang Province[J]. China Land Science, 2018, 32(1): 35-41. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] 胡银根, 王聪, 廖成泉, 等. 不同治理结构下农村宅基地有偿退出模式探析:以金寨、蓟州、义乌3个典型试点为例[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2017, 33(12): 1411-1416.
HU Y G, WANG C, LIAO C Q, et al.Study on mode of paid exit in rural homestead under different governance structures: based on three typical pilot projects in Jinzhai, Jizhou and Yiwu[J]. Resource Development & Market, 2017, 33(12): 1411-1416. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] 朱从谋, 苑韶峰, 李胜男, 等. 基于发展权与功能损失的农村宅基地流转增值收益分配研究: 以义乌市‘集地券’为例[J]. 中国土地科学, 2017, 31(7): 37-44.
ZHU C M, YUAN S F, LI S N, et al.Study on incremental revenue distribution of rural residential land based on land development right and function loss: taking the “land coupons” in Yiwu as an example[J]. China Land Science, 2017, 31(7): 37-44. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] 中国社会科学院农村发展研究所“农村集体产权制度改革研究”课题组. 关于农村集体产权制度改革的几个理论与政策问题[J]. 中国农村经济, 2015 (2): 4-12.
Research Team on “Reform of Rural Collective Property Rights System”, Rural Development Institute, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. Study on theory basis and polices regarding reform of rural collective property rights system[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2015 (2): 4-12. (in Chinese)
[9] 吴学安.宅基地三权分置亟需法律规范[N]. 中华工商时报, 2018-01-31(3).
[10] 李国祥. 农村宅基地改革要守住三条底线[J]. 农村经营管理, 2017 (5): 26-27.
LI G X.Bottom lines for rural housing land reform[J]. Management and Administration on Rural Cooperative, 2017 (5): 26-27. (in Chinese)
[11] 丁关良, 周菊香. 对完善农村集体土地所有权制度的法律思考[J]. 中国农村经济, 2000 (11): 59-65.
DING G L, ZHOU J X.Legal reflection on rural housing land right[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2000 (11): 59-65. (in Chinese)
[12] 毛丹, 王萍. 英语学术界的乡村转型研究[J]. 社会学研究, 2014 (1): 194-216.
MAO D, WANG P.The evolution of western rural restructuring research[J]. Sociological Studies, 2014 (1): 194-216. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] 朱明芬, 邓容. 农村宅基地使用权隐性流转情况的实证调查[J]. 农村经济, 2012 (12): 14-20.
ZHU M F, DENG R.Empirical investigation on the implicit circulation of the use of rural housing land right[J]. Rural Economy, 2012 (12): 14-20. (in Chinese)

农村宅基地产权权能拓展与规范研究——基于浙江义乌宅基地“三权分置”的改革实践

Research on rural housing land property right power development and specification: based on reform practice of rural housing land ‘three rights separations’ in Yiwu, Zhejiang

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张公望, 朱明芬. 农村宅基地制度改革与农民增收——基于6个试点县(市、区)面板数据的双重差分分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(8): 1475-1484.
[2]	陈方丽, 钱龙, 王锦良. 确权颁证对农户宅基地流转行为的影响研究——来自温州市的经验证据[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(3): 503-511.