浙江农业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7): 1474-1484.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.07.15
姚燕来1(), 朱为静1, 丁检2, 洪磊东1, 洪春来1, 王卫平1,*(
), 朱凤香1, 何伟科3, 洪海清3
收稿日期:
2021-04-14
出版日期:
2022-07-25
发布日期:
2022-07-26
通讯作者:
王卫平
作者简介:
* 王卫平,E-mail: wangweiping119@126.com基金资助:
YAO Yanlai1(), ZHU Weijing1, DING Jian2, HONG Leidong1, HONG Chunlai1, WANG Weiping1,*(
), ZHU Fengxiang1, HE Weike3, HONG Haiqing3
Received:
2021-04-14
Online:
2022-07-25
Published:
2022-07-26
Contact:
WANG Weiping
摘要:
蔬菜产业是浙江省十大农业主导产业之一,但近年来规模化蔬菜基地土壤质量退化、连作障碍频发,已成为制约浙江蔬菜产业绿色可持续发展的重要限制因子。为探明浙江省规模化蔬菜基地连作障碍发生情况和土壤环境状况,调查了8个地级市24个县市区的65家规模化蔬菜基地,采集101个土壤样品,分析其土壤理化性状和部分样品中2种典型土传病害病原微生物的数量。调查表明,浙江省规模化蔬菜基地种植年限长,46.2%以上的规模化基地种植年限大于10 a,连作现象较为普遍,平均土传病害发病率达到17.82%,平均减产达到22.12%,部分基地重病年份甚至绝收。当前,浙江省部分规模化蔬菜基地土壤退化严重,土壤pH值≤5.0的样品占比33.7%,土壤电导率>1 000 μS·cm-1的样品占比42.6%。土壤中养分大量积累,有效磷和速效钾含量的平均值分别达到184.30 mg·kg-1和387.20 mg·kg-1。相关性分析表明,土壤中尖孢镰刀菌数量与碱解氮和有效磷含量间存在显著(P<0.05)相关性。土壤酸化、次生盐渍化、速效养分和病原菌的大量积累等成为当前规模化蔬菜基地土壤环境质量退化与连作障碍频发的重要原因,研究结果可为浙江省规模化蔬菜基地连作障碍的有效防控提供依据。
中图分类号:
姚燕来, 朱为静, 丁检, 洪磊东, 洪春来, 王卫平, 朱凤香, 何伟科, 洪海清. 浙江省规模化蔬菜基地连作障碍与土壤环境调查分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(7): 1474-1484.
YAO Yanlai, ZHU Weijing, DING Jian, HONG Leidong, HONG Chunlai, WANG Weiping, ZHU Fengxiang, HE Weike, HONG Haiqing. Investigation and analysis of continuous cropping obstacle and soil environment in large-scale vegetable bases in Zhejiang Province, China[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(7): 1474-1484.
图2 调查中部分基地连作障碍发生情况的照片 A、B,温州番茄青枯病和“半边疯”发病情况;C、D,台州地区线虫病害发生情况;E、F,衢州和宁波甜瓜枯萎病发病情况;G,嘉兴叶菜连作障碍;H,宁波西瓜连作情况。
Fig.2 Photos of occurrence of continuous cropping obstacles in large-scale vegetable bases A and B, Occurrence of tomato bacterial wilt and “half madness” disease in Wenzhou; C and D, Occurrence of nematode disease in Taizhou; E and F, Occurrence of melon Fusarium wilt in Quzhou and Ningbo; G, Continuous cropping obstacles of leaf vegetables in Jiaxing; H, Continuous cropping obstacles of watermelon in Ningbo.
图6 番茄、茄子、甜瓜等连作土壤中尖孢镰刀菌和青枯病菌的数量(以干土计)
Fig.6 Quantity of Fusarium oxysporum and Ralstoniasolanacearum(based on dry weight) in continuous cropping soil of tomato, eggplant or melon
指标 Index | 因子载荷Factor loading | ||
---|---|---|---|
因子1 Factor 1 | 因子2 Factor 2 | 因子3 Factor 3 | |
尖孢镰刀菌数量 | 0.104 | 0.836 | 0.272 |
Quantiy of Fusarium oxysporum | |||
pH | -0.603 | -0.342 | 0.572 |
EC | 0.619 | -0.252 | 0.583 |
有机质Organic matter | 0.812 | -0.367 | -0.072 |
全氮Total nitrogen | 0.920 | -0.248 | -0.056 |
碱解氮Available nitrogen | 0.688 | 0.507 | -0.339 |
有效磷Available phosphorus | 0.437 | 0.577 | 0.473 |
速效钾Available potassium | 0.845 | -0.251 | 0.109 |
表1 土壤理化性状指标与尖孢镰刀菌数量的主成分分析结果
Table 1 Principal component analysis result of soil physiochemical indexes and quantity of Fusarium oxysporum
指标 Index | 因子载荷Factor loading | ||
---|---|---|---|
因子1 Factor 1 | 因子2 Factor 2 | 因子3 Factor 3 | |
尖孢镰刀菌数量 | 0.104 | 0.836 | 0.272 |
Quantiy of Fusarium oxysporum | |||
pH | -0.603 | -0.342 | 0.572 |
EC | 0.619 | -0.252 | 0.583 |
有机质Organic matter | 0.812 | -0.367 | -0.072 |
全氮Total nitrogen | 0.920 | -0.248 | -0.056 |
碱解氮Available nitrogen | 0.688 | 0.507 | -0.339 |
有效磷Available phosphorus | 0.437 | 0.577 | 0.473 |
速效钾Available potassium | 0.845 | -0.251 | 0.109 |
指标 Index | 尖孢镰刀菌数量 Quantity of Fusarium oxysporum | pH | EC | 有机质 Organic matter | 全氮 Total nitrogen | 碱解氮 Available nitrogen | 有效磷 Available phosphorus |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | -0.143 | ||||||
EC | 0.002 | -0.061 | |||||
有机质Organic matter | -0.146 | -0.328* | 0.415** | ||||
全氮Total nitrogen | -0.120 | -0.425** | 0.568** | 0.883** | |||
碱解氮Available nitrogen | 0.375* | -0.674** | 0.143 | 0.334* | 0.566 | ||
有效磷Available phosphorus | 0.473** | -0.217 | 0.289 | 0.132 | 0.242 | 0.382* | |
速效钾Available potassium | -0.058 | -0.383* | 0.606** | 0.717** | 0.738 | 0.382* | 0.242 |
表2 土壤理化性状指标与尖孢镰刀菌数量的相关性分析
Table 2 Correlation analysis of soil physiochemical indexes and quantity of Fusarium oxysporum
指标 Index | 尖孢镰刀菌数量 Quantity of Fusarium oxysporum | pH | EC | 有机质 Organic matter | 全氮 Total nitrogen | 碱解氮 Available nitrogen | 有效磷 Available phosphorus |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | -0.143 | ||||||
EC | 0.002 | -0.061 | |||||
有机质Organic matter | -0.146 | -0.328* | 0.415** | ||||
全氮Total nitrogen | -0.120 | -0.425** | 0.568** | 0.883** | |||
碱解氮Available nitrogen | 0.375* | -0.674** | 0.143 | 0.334* | 0.566 | ||
有效磷Available phosphorus | 0.473** | -0.217 | 0.289 | 0.132 | 0.242 | 0.382* | |
速效钾Available potassium | -0.058 | -0.383* | 0.606** | 0.717** | 0.738 | 0.382* | 0.242 |
[1] | 肖体琼, 崔思远, 陈永生, 等. 我国蔬菜生产概况及机械化发展现状[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2017, 38(8): 107-111. |
XIAO T Q, CUI S Y, CHEN Y S, et al. Development status of vegetable production and its mechanization in China[J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2017, 38(8): 107-111. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | CHEN P, WANG Y Z, LIU Q Z, et al. Phase changes of continuous cropping obstacles in strawberry (Fragaria×ananassa Duch.) production[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2020, 155: 103626. |
[3] | 阿衣加玛丽·库都热提, 张以和. 甜瓜连作障碍及其消减技术研究进展[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2020, 33(5): 1-5. |
AYIJIAMALI·K, ZHANG Y H. Research progress on continuous cropping obstacle and its reduction techniques of muskmelon[J]. China Cucurbits and Vegetables, 2020, 33(5): 1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 高晶霞, 高昱, 吴雪梅, 等. 辣椒连作土壤微生物群落及土壤离子对微生物菌剂的响应[J]. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(8): 1659-1664. |
GAO J X, GAO Y, WU X M, et al. Response of soil microbial community and soil ions to microbial agents in pepper continuous cropping[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 33(8): 1659-1664. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 贾喜霞, 师桂英, 黄炜, 等. 土壤消毒剂配施微生物有机肥及生防菌剂缓解设施茄子连作障碍的作用效应微生物菌剂[J]. 分子植物育种, 2020, 18(13): 4492-4498. |
JIA X X, SHI G Y, HUANG W, et al. Soil disinfectant combined with microorganic agent to alleviate eggplant consecutive replant problems in greenhouse[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2020, 18(13): 4492-4498. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 徐云焕, 杨新琴, 柏德玟, 等. “十三五”浙江蔬菜产业提升对策探讨[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2016, 57(7): 1028-1031. |
XU Y H, YANG X Q, BAI D M, et al. Discussion on the countermeasures of Zhejiang vegetable industry promotion during the “Thirteenth Five-Year Plan”[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 57(7): 1028-1031. (in Chinese) | |
[7] | 金昌林, 潘慧锋, 杨新琴, 等. 浙江省蔬菜产业现状与发展对策研究[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2014, 55(1): 1-5. |
JIN C L, PAN H F, YANG X Q, et al. Present situation and development countermeasure of vegetable industry in Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 55(1): 1-5. (in Chinese) | |
[8] | 卢维宏, 张乃明, 包立, 等. 我国设施栽培连作障碍特征与成因及防治措施的研究进展[J]. 土壤, 2020, 52(4): 651-658. |
LU W H, ZHANG N M, BAO L, et al. Study advances on characteristics, causes and control measures of continuous cropping obstacles of facility cultivation in China[J]. Soils, 2020, 52(4): 651-658. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 文方芳. 种植年限对设施大棚土壤次生盐渍化与酸化的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2016(4): 49-53. |
WEN F F. Effect of planting years on soil secondary salinity and soil acidification in greenhouse[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2016(4): 49-53. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 余海英, 李廷轩, 周健民. 设施土壤次生盐渍化及其对土壤性质的影响[J]. 土壤, 2005, 37(6): 581-586. |
YU H Y, LI T X, ZHOU J M. Secondary salinization of greenhouse soil and its effects on soil properties[J]. Soils, 2005, 37(6): 581-586. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | SADAF J, SHAH G A, SHAHZAD K, et al. Improvements in wheat productivity and soil quality can accomplish by co-application of biochars and chemical fertilizers[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 607/ 608: 715-724. |
[12] | 郭树根, 沈怡斐, 姚燕来, 等. 生物强化还原处理防控辣椒连作障碍[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2018, 59(9): 1674-1679. |
GUO S G, SHEN Y F, YAO Y L, et al. Integrated control of Capsicum annuum L. continuous cropping obstacles by bioaugmented reductive treatment[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 59(9): 1674-1679. (in Chinese) | |
[13] |
CESARANO G, DE FILIPPIS F, LA STORIA A, et al. Organic amendment type and application frequency affect crop yields, soil fertility and microbiome composition[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2017, 120: 254-264.
DOI URL |
[14] |
肖怡, 冯浪, 王鹏, 等. 盐源县植烟土壤速效养分空间变异特征研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(8): 1329-1335.
DOI |
XIAO Y, FENG L, WANG P, et al. Study on spatial variability of soil available nutrients in tobacco planting soil in Yanyuan County[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2017, 29(8): 1329-1335. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
|
[15] |
GAO X, ZHANG S X, ZHAO X J, et al. Evaluation of potassium application on tomato performance and rhizosphere bacterial communities under negative pressure irrigation of greenhouse-grown[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2020, 43(3): 317-326.
DOI URL |
[16] | 伍朝荣, 林威鹏, 黄飞, 等. 土壤厌氧消毒对青枯病的控制及土壤细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2018, 55(4): 987-998. |
WU C R, LIN W P, HUANG F, et al. Effects of anaerobic soil disinfestation on bacterial wilt and soil bacterial community[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2018, 55(4): 987-998. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] |
YAO Y L, XUE Z Y, HONG C L, et al. Efficiency of different solarization-based ecological soil treatments on the control of Fusarium wilt and their impacts on the soil microbial community[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2016, 108: 341-351.
DOI URL |
[18] | 浙江省农业农村厅. 浙江省省级耕地质量监测报告(2019年度)[R]. 杭州: 浙江省农业农村厅. 2020. |
[19] | 张海欧, 张扬. 不同客土覆盖厚度对河滩地土壤养分分布的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020, 40(5): 27-32. |
ZHANG H O, ZHANG Y. Effects of different thickness of soil cover on soil nutrient distribution at flood land[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 40(5): 27-32. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 刘智慧, 陈慧, 包美丽, 等. 生防菌与有机肥联用防治马铃薯枯萎病及对土壤微生态的影响[J]. 中国马铃薯, 2017, 31(1): 30-37. |
LIU Z H, CHEN H, BAO M L, et al. Control of Fusarium wilt in potato using biocontrol agents combined with organic fertilizer and their effects on soil micro ecology[J]. Chinese Potato Journal, 2017, 31(1): 30-37. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 王广印, 郭卫丽, 陈碧华, 等. 河南省设施蔬菜连作障碍现状调查与分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(25): 27-33. |
WANG G Y, GUO W L, CHEN B H, et al. Continuous cropping obstacles of facilities vegetables in Henan: investigation and analysis[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(25): 27-33. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 张静清, 章文洪. 未腐熟鸡粪对设施蔬菜的影响及解决方法探讨[J]. 山西农业科学, 2009, 37(10): 46-47. |
ZHANG J Q, ZHANG W H. Influence of non-decomposed chicken feces to facilities vegetables and its solution[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 37(10): 46-47. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 李朋飞, 杜国强, 刘超, 等. 安徽淮北平原农田土壤酸碱度特征及酸化趋势研究[J]. 华东地质, 2019, 40(3): 234-240. |
LI P F, DU G Q, LIU C, et al. Acidity and basicity characteristics and acidification trend of the farmland soil in Huaibei Plain, Anhui Province[J]. East China Geology, 2019, 40(3): 234-240. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 张玲玉, 赵学强, 沈仁芳. 土壤酸化及其生态效应[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(6): 1900-1908. |
ZHANG L Y, ZHAO X Q, SHEN R F. Soil acidification and its ecological effects[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2019, 38(6): 1900-1908. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 樊战辉, 唐小军, 郑丹, 等. 茶园土壤酸化成因及改良措施研究和展望[J]. 茶叶科学, 2020, 40(1): 15-25. |
FAN Z H, TANG X J, ZHENG D, et al. Study and prospect of soil acidification causes and improvement measures in tea plantation[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2020, 40(1): 15-25. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | ZHAO X Q, SHEN R F. Aluminum-nitrogen interactions in the soil-plant system[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018, 9: 807. |
[27] | 姚燕来, 黄飞龙, 薛智勇, 等. 土壤环境因子对土壤中黄瓜枯萎病致病菌增殖的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2015(1): 106-110. |
YAO Y L, HUANG F L, XUE Z Y, et al. Effect of different soil environmental factors on the proliferation of the pathogen of cucumber Fusarium wilt[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2015(1): 106-110. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 熊毅, 李庆逵. 中国土壤[M]. 2版. 北京: 科学出版社,1987. |
[29] | 周可金, 马成泽, 宋燕平, 等. 过量施用钾肥对花生生长的抑制作用[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2001, 28(3): 284-287. |
ZHOU K J, MA C Z, SONG Y P, et al. Restraint of over-applied potassium on the growth of peanut[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 2001, 28(3): 284-287. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 梁银, 张谷月, 王辰, 等. 一株拮抗放线菌的鉴定及其对黄瓜枯萎病的生防效应研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2013, 50(4): 810-817. |
LIANG Y, ZHANG G Y, WANG C, et al. Identification and biocontrol effect of a strain of actinomycete antagonistic to wilt disease of cucumber[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2013, 50(4): 810-817. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 王一鸣, 龙胜举, 陈延, 贺忠群, 赵英鹏, 仰路希, 严文一. 土壤酸化对景天三七叶片光合特性及超微结构的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(6): 915-921. |
[2] | 王燕云, 赵龙杰, 郝春莉, 蔡尽忠. 生物有机肥对不同连作年限设施黄瓜土壤微生物数量和酶活性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(4): 631-638. |
[3] | 刘紫英, 黄磊, 袁斌, 刘小林, 徐胜光, 黄涛. 一株草莓连作自毒障碍主要物质苯甲酸降解细菌的筛选及其降解效果研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(10): 1699-1704. |
[4] | 周开胜. 强还原处理改良西瓜连作土壤[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(6): 982-987. |
[5] | 范琳娟, 刘奇志, 王合, 徐振翔, 李维华. 玉米-苹果轮作体系对苹果根际土壤酶活性和pH值的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(12): 2084-2090. |
[6] | 徐伟慧, 吴凤芝. 西瓜根际土壤酶及微生物对小麦伴生的响应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(9): 1588-1594. |
[7] | 刘涛,杜磊,郑子成*,李廷轩,张锡洲. 不同灌水频率下设施土壤盐分时空变化特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(6): 1048-. |
[8] | 吴铖铖;李丽;张慧娟;李大勇;宋凤鸣* . 甜瓜黑点根腐病及其研究进展[J]. , 2012, 24(2): 0-354. |
[9] | 符建荣;王强;叶静;姜丽娜;马军伟;汪建妹. 不同盐胁迫型有机无机复混肥对土壤的致盐力及作物生长的影响[J]. , 2005, 17(5): 0-243. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||