基于熵权TOPSIS模型的耕地生态补偿政策绩效评价与关联分析——以浙江省开化县为例

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.12.23

浙江农业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (12): 2800-2808.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.12.23

基于熵权TOPSIS模型的耕地生态补偿政策绩效评价与关联分析——以浙江省开化县为例

张艳彬¹(), 梁颖²^,^*(), 耿槟³, 顾明哲³, 徐保根³

1.浙江省国土整治中心,浙江杭州 310007
2.浙江财经大学东方学院工商管理学院,浙江嘉兴 314408
3.浙江财经大学土地与城乡发展研究院,浙江杭州 310018

收稿日期:2021-07-05 出版日期:2022-12-25 发布日期:2022-12-26
通讯作者: 梁颖
作者简介:*梁颖,E-mail:liangyingzjcj@126.com
张艳彬(1977—),女,吉林榆树人,博士,高级工程师,主要从事土地管理工作。E-mail:13822048@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(41401624)

Performance evaluation and correlational analysis of cultivated land ecological compensation policy based on entropy-weight TOPSIS method: taking Kaihua County, Zhejiang Province, China as an example

ZHANG Yanbin¹(), LIANG Ying²^,^*(), GENG Bin³, GU Mingzhe³, XU Baogen³

1. Zhejiang Provincial Land Consolidation Center, Hangzhou 310007, China
2. School of Business Administration, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics Dongfang College, Jiaxing 314408, Zhejiang, China
3. Institute of Land and Urban-Rural Development, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China

Received:2021-07-05 Online:2022-12-25 Published:2022-12-26
Contact: LIANG Ying

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

研究耕地生态补偿政策绩效对耕地生态保护具有重要意义。该研究以浙江省开化县为研究区,构建县级耕地生态补偿政策绩效评价指标体系,使用熵权法评价2007—2020年开化县耕地生态补偿政策绩效,并通过灰色关联分析方法分析耕地生态补偿政策绩效的关键影响因素。研究表明,开化县耕地生态补偿政策综合绩效在2007—2020年总体呈上升趋势,虽在2009年和2013年出现短暂下跌,但很快继续上涨,2015年开始保持稳定平缓。农户耕地生态补偿积极性和农村居民人均年收入对耕地生态补偿政策综合绩效的影响较大。该研究结果说明耕地生态补偿政策发挥了较好的效果,有继续实施的必要性。本研究关于耕地生态补偿政策绩效的评价及关联分析,对完善和创新耕地生态补偿政策具有重要意义。

关键词: 耕地生态补偿政策, 绩效评价, 熵权, 关联度

Abstract:

It is of great significance to study the comprehensive performance of ecological compensation policy for cultivated land ecological protection. This paper took Kaihua County, Zhejiang Province as the research area and constructed the performance evaluation index system of ecological compensation policy at the county level. Then entropy-weighted (TOPSIS) method was used to evaluate the comprehensive performance of ecological compensation policies from 2007 to 2020 and grey correlational analysis was used to calculate the correlative degree between indicators and evaluation of comprehensive levels. It was found that the comprehensive performance of ecological compensation policy was uptrend from 2007 to 2020. Although there was a brief decline in 2009 and 2013, it soon continued to rise, and maintained steady growth after 2015. farmers' enthusiasm for ecological componsation of cultivated land and annual per capita income of rural residents had the greatest impact on performance evaluation. Empirical evidence showed that ecological compensation policies played a better effect, and it was necessary to continue to implement. The evaluation and correlation analysis of the comprehensive performance of ecological compensation policy in this study was of great significance to improve and innovate the cultivated land ecological compensation policy.

Key words: farmland ecological compensation policy, performance appraisal, entropy-weight, correlation

中图分类号:

F301.21

张艳彬, 梁颖, 耿槟, 顾明哲, 徐保根. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型的耕地生态补偿政策绩效评价与关联分析——以浙江省开化县为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(12): 2800-2808.

ZHANG Yanbin, LIANG Ying, GENG Bin, GU Mingzhe, XU Baogen. Performance evaluation and correlational analysis of cultivated land ecological compensation policy based on entropy-weight TOPSIS method: taking Kaihua County, Zhejiang Province, China as an example[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(12): 2800-2808.

图/表 3

参考文献 29

[1]	孔祥斌. 中国耕地保护生态治理内涵及实现路径[J]. 中国土地科学, 2020, 34(12): 1-10.
	KONG X B. The connotation and realization path of ecological governance of cultivated land protection in China[J]. China Land Science, 2020, 34(12): 1-10. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	YU Z N, YAO L, WU M Y. Farmers' attitude towards the policy of remediation during fallow in soil fertility declining and heavy metal polluted area of China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2020, 97: 104741. DOI URL
[3]	张晗, 赵小敏, 匡丽花, 等. 基于空间自相关的耕地质量空间分布特征研究: 以江西省南昌县为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(8): 1365-1374. DOI
	ZHANG H, ZHAO X M, KUANG L H, et al. Spatial distribution features of cultivated land quality based on spatial autocorrelation: a case study of Nanchang County, Jiangxi Province[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2017, 29(8): 1365-1374. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
[4]	苗苗, 迮寒露, 吴永华. 浙江省耕地利用转型时空演变特征分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(4): 753-760. DOI
	MIAO M, ZE H L, WU Y H. Spatio-temporal evolution characteristics of cultivated land use transition in Zhejiang Province[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(4): 753-760. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
[5]	崔宁波, 生世玉. 基于公平视角的耕地生态补偿标准量化研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021, 41(1): 138-143.
	CUI N B, SHENG S Y. Quantitative research on cultivated land ecological compensation standard based on equity[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 41(1): 138-143. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	汪晓帆, 郝亮, 秦海波, 等. 政策工具视角下中国耕地生态管护政策文本量化研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2018, 32(12): 15-23.
	WANG X F, HAO L, QIN H B, et al. Textual quantitative analysis of cultivated land ecological management and protection policies in China from the perspective of policy tools[J]. China Land Science, 2018, 32(12): 15-23. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	李霜, 聂鑫, 张安录. 基于生态系统服务评估的农地生态补偿机制研究进展[J]. 资源科学, 2020, 42(11): 2251-2260. DOI
	LI S, NIE X, ZHANG A L. Research progress on farmland ecological compensation mechanism based on ecosystem service evaluation[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(11): 2251-2260. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
[8]	ENGEL S, PAGIOLA S, WUNDER S. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65(4): 663-674. DOI URL
[9]	王慧杰, 毕粉粉, 董战峰. 基于AHP-模糊综合评价法的新安江流域生态补偿政策绩效评估[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(20): 7493-7506.
	WANG H J, BI F F, DONG Z F. Evaluation of ecological compensation policy for Xin'an River Basin based on AHP-Fuzzy Comprehensive Method[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(20): 7493-7506. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	ZHANG Q, SONG C H, CHEN X D. Effects of China's payment for ecosystem services programs on cropland abandonment: a case study in Tiantangzhai Township, Anhui, China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 73: 239-248. DOI URL
[11]	梁流涛, 高攀, 刘琳轲. 区际农业生态补偿标准及“两横”财政跨区域转移机制: 以虚拟耕地为载体[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(24): 9281-9294.
	LIANG L T, GAO P, LIU L K. The “Two Horizon” inter-regional agro-ecological compensation standard and cross-regional financial transfer mechanism: a study based on virtual cultivated land[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(24): 9281-9294. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	李福夺, 任静, 尹昌斌. 资本禀赋、价值认知与农户绿肥养地采纳行为: 基于南方稻区农户调查数据及生态补偿政策的调节效应[J]. 农林经济管理学报, 2020, 19(4): 464-475.
	LI F D, REN J, YIN C B. Capital endowment, value cognition and farmers' adoption behavior of planting green manure: based on the survey data of farmers in Southern China and the moderating effect of ecological compensation policies[J]. Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management, 2020, 19(4): 464-475. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	申开丽, 王晓艺, 张盈盈, 等. 生态屏障地区的生态补偿绩效评估研究[J]. 生态经济, 2018, 34(6): 199-204.
	SHEN K L, WANG X Y, ZHANG Y Y, et al. Performance evaluation on ecological compensation in ecological sheltered ground[J]. Ecological Economy, 2018, 34(6): 199-204. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	WELLS G J, STUART N, FURLEY P A, et al. Ecosystem service analysis in marginal agricultural lands: a case study in Belize[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2018, 32: 70-77. DOI URL
[15]	丁翠, 马守臣, 李明秋, 等. 煤矿废弃地复垦耕地生态系统的可持续性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(12): 2097-2103. DOI
	DING C, MA S C, LI M Q, et al. Sustainability evaluation of reclaimed cultivated land ecosystem in coal mine wasteland[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2017, 29(12): 2097-2103. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
[16]	刘卫柏, 杨胜苏, 李中, 等. 重金属污染治理试点地区农户对耕地休耕政策的满意度及其影响因素[J]. 经济地理, 2021, 41(1): 158-164.
	LIU W B, YANG S S, LI Z, et al. Satisfaction of farmers upon the fallow policy of cultivated land and its influencing factors in the pilot area of heavy metal pollution governance[J]. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(1): 158-164. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	XIE X, XIE H L, SHU C, et al. Estimation of ecological compensation standards for fallow heavy metal-polluted farmland in China based on farmer willingness to accept[J]. Sustainability, 2017, 9(10): 1859. DOI URL
[18]	阮熹晟, 李坦, 张藕香, 等. 基于生态服务价值的长江经济带耕地生态补偿量化研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2021, 42(1): 68-76.
	RUAN X S, LI T, ZHANG O X, et al. A quantitative study on ecological compensation of cultivated land in the Yangtze River economic belt based on ecological service value[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2021, 42(1): 68-76. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	张俊峰, 贺三维, 张光宏, 等. 流域耕地生态盈亏、空间外溢与财政转移: 基于长江经济带的实证分析[J]. 农业经济问题, 2020, 41(12): 120-132.
	ZHANG J F, HE S W, ZHANG G H, et al. Ecological benefit, spatial spillover and fiscal transfer of farmland in watershed: evidence from the Yangtze River economic belt[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2020, 41(12): 120-132. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	赵亚莉, 龙开胜. 农地“三权”分置下耕地生态补偿的理论逻辑与实现路径[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 20(5): 119-127.
	ZHAO Y L, LONG K S. Theoretical logic and realization paths of arable land ecological compensation under tripartite rural land entitlement system[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 20(5): 119-127. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	柳荻, 胡振通, 靳乐山. 基于农户受偿意愿的地下水超采区休耕补偿标准研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019, 29(8): 130-139.
	LIU D, HU Z T, JIN L S. Study on compensation rate for fallow program in groundwater over-exploited area based on rural households' willingness to accept[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2019, 29(8): 130-139. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	张方圆, 赵雪雁. 基于农户感知的生态补偿效应分析: 以黑河中游张掖市为例[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2014, 22(3): 349-355.
	ZHANG F Y, ZHAO X Y. Effect of farmers' perception on ecological compensation: a case study of Zhangye Prefecture in the Heihe River Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2014, 22(3): 349-355. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
[23]	邓远建, 肖锐, 严立冬. 绿色农业产地环境的生态补偿政策绩效评价[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2015, 25(1): 120-126.
	DENG Y J, XIAO R, YAN L D. Research on the evaluation of ecological compensation policies of green agricultural producing areas: a case in Dongxihu district in Wuhan[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2015, 25(1): 120-126. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	王奕淇, 李国平, 延步青. 流域生态服务价值横向补偿分摊研究[J]. 资源科学, 2019, 41(6): 1013-1023. DOI
	WANG Y Q, LI G P, YAN B Q. Sharing of watershed ecosystem service value horizontal compensation burden by downstream cities[J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(6): 1013-1023. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
[25]	刘馨月, 周力, 应瑞瑶. 耕地重金属污染治理生态补偿政策选择与组合研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2021, 35(1): 88-97.
	LIU X Y, ZHOU L, YING R Y. Research on ecological compensation policy choice and combination for heavy metal pollution control of cultivated land[J]. China Land Science, 2021, 35(1): 88-97. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	陈英, 王东, 王顺然. 黄土高原丘陵沟壑区高标准农田建设时序研究: 以天水市麦积区为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(4): 660-667. DOI
	CHEN Y, WANG D, WANG S R. Time arrangement of excellent-criterion farmland construction in loess hill and gully region: a case study of Maiji District, Tianshui City[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2017, 29(4): 660-667. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
[27]	张发明, 丁峰, 王坪. 中国粮食主产区农业高质量发展水平评价与时空演变[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(1): 150-160. DOI
	ZHANG F M, DING F, WANG P. Evaluation of high-quality agricultural development level in major grain producing areas in China and its spatial and temporal evolution[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(1): 150-160. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
[28]	田和彬, 汪军妹, 华为, 等. 大麦主要农艺和品质性状的相关性及灰色关联度分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2011, 23(3): 433-438.
	TIAN H B, WANG J M, HUA W, et al. Correlation and grey relational analysis of main agronomic traits and malting quality traits of barley[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2011, 23(3): 433-438. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	于明含, 孙保平. 广西平果县退耕还林土壤环境效应及生态效益价值估算[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2012, 24(1): 114-119.
	YU M H, SUN B P. Environmental effect of returning farmland to forest and its ecological value estimation in Pingguo County, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2012, 24(1): 114-119. (in Chinese with English abstract)

准则 Guideline	变量 Variable	指标 Index	单位 Unit	指标方向 Index direction
区域共同富裕效益 Regional common	X₁	农村居民人均年收入 Annual per capita income of rural residents	元·人^-1 Yuan·person^-1	+
prosperity benefits	X₂	城乡居民收入比 Urban and rural income ratio	%	+
	X₃	粮食总产量 Grain total output	t	+
	X₄	粮食单产水平 Grain yield per unit area	kg·hm^-2	+
	X₅	农户耕地生态补偿积极性 Farmers' enthusiasm for ecological compensation of cultivated land	-	+
	X₆	外出务工人数 Number of migrant workers	人 person	+
耕地绿色投入效益 Green input benefit of	X₇	无公害农产品生产基地面积 Area of pollution-free agricultural products production base	hm²	+
cultivated land	X₈	化肥施用量(折纯) Chemical fertilizer application amount (discounted)	t·hm^-2	-
	X₉	农药使用量 Consumption of Chemical Pesticides	t·hm^-2	-
耕地生态效益 Ecological benefit of	X₁₀	大气调节功能价值 Value of atmospheric regulation function	元 Yuan	+
cultivated land	X₁₁	水源涵养功能价值 Water conservation function value	元 Yuan	+
	X₁₂	其他生态功能价值 Other ecological function value	元 Yuan	+

准则 Guideline	变量 Variable	指标 Index	单位 Unit	指标方向 Index direction
区域共同富裕效益 Regional common	X₁	农村居民人均年收入 Annual per capita income of rural residents	元·人^-1 Yuan·person^-1	+
prosperity benefits	X₂	城乡居民收入比 Urban and rural income ratio	%	+
	X₃	粮食总产量 Grain total output	t	+
	X₄	粮食单产水平 Grain yield per unit area	kg·hm^-2	+
	X₅	农户耕地生态补偿积极性 Farmers' enthusiasm for ecological compensation of cultivated land	-	+
	X₆	外出务工人数 Number of migrant workers	人 person	+
耕地绿色投入效益 Green input benefit of	X₇	无公害农产品生产基地面积 Area of pollution-free agricultural products production base	hm²	+
cultivated land	X₈	化肥施用量(折纯) Chemical fertilizer application amount (discounted)	t·hm^-2	-
	X₉	农药使用量 Consumption of Chemical Pesticides	t·hm^-2	-
耕地生态效益 Ecological benefit of	X₁₀	大气调节功能价值 Value of atmospheric regulation function	元 Yuan	+
cultivated land	X₁₁	水源涵养功能价值 Water conservation function value	元 Yuan	+
	X₁₂	其他生态功能价值 Other ecological function value	元 Yuan	+

单项指标 Single index	贴近度 Similar degree(r_i)	单项指标 Single index	贴近度 Similar degree(r_i)
X₁	0.83	X₇	0.78
X₂	0.68	X₈	0.62
X₃	0.73	X₉	0.58
X₄	0.65	X₁₀	0.66
X₅	0.86	X₁₁	0.74
X₆	0.73	X₁₂	0.72

单项指标 Single index	贴近度 Similar degree(r_i)	单项指标 Single index	贴近度 Similar degree(r_i)
X₁	0.83	X₇	0.78
X₂	0.68	X₈	0.62
X₃	0.73	X₉	0.58
X₄	0.65	X₁₀	0.66
X₅	0.86	X₁₁	0.74
X₆	0.73	X₁₂	0.72

基于熵权TOPSIS模型的耕地生态补偿政策绩效评价与关联分析——以浙江省开化县为例

Performance evaluation and correlational analysis of cultivated land ecological compensation policy based on entropy-weight TOPSIS method: taking Kaihua County, Zhejiang Province, China as an example

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 29

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	常雯雯, 刘吉利, 吴娜, 张永乾, 何海锋. 西北盐碱地区不同柳枝稷品种光合特性与产量比较[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(10): 1647-1654.
[2]	李琦, 刘双. 影响苏尼特放牧羊体质量变化的相关因素分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(10): 1630-1636.
[3]	董环, 娄春荣, 袁兴福, 陈晓云, 何志刚. 北方设施草甸土土壤盐分组成分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(12): 2076-2081.
[4]	陈宁丽1，张红方2，张合兵1，*，司朝霞1. 基于熵权TOPSIS法的耕地生态质量空间分布格局及主控因子分析——以河南省新郑市为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(8): 1444-.
[5]	薛沛沛;王兵;*;牛香. 大岗山不同海拔毛竹林土壤肥力的灰色关联度分析[J]. , 2013, 25(6): 0-1359.
[6]	龚娜;杨镇;王娜;李学龙;肖军;陈珣;杨涛*. 植物内生菌次生代谢产物影响大豆主要性状的灰色关联度分析[J]. , 2013, 25(5): 0-937.
[7]	唐绮遥;彭建良*. 新农村物流发展影响因子的灰色关联分析 ——以杭州市属7县（市、区）为例[J]. , 2013, 25(5): 0-1141.
[8]	史常亮;王忠平*. 基于供求视角的中国粮食安全影响因素研究[J]. , 2013, 25(5): 0-1152.
[9]	黄会明;胡桂仙. 鸡蛋新鲜度与影响因素的灰色关联分析[J]. , 2009, 21(6): 0-626.
[10]	孙利祥;黄惠芳. 大棚辣椒品种比较及其果实品质的灰色关联分析[J]. , 2005, 17(6): 0-371.
[11]	赵军华;俞忠良;楼肖成;郭章贤. 应用关联分析法综合评估糯玉米新品种[J]. , 2002, 14(5): 0-287.