浙江农业学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 404-415.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230406
        
               		杨紫瀚1,2(
), 吴伟杰2, 高原2, 刘瑞玲2, 申屠旭萍1, 郜海燕2, 陈杭君2,*(
)
                  
        
        
        
        
    
收稿日期:2023-03-29
									
				
									
				
									
				
											出版日期:2024-02-25
									
				
											发布日期:2024-03-05
									
			作者简介:杨紫瀚(1997—),男,甘肃兰州人,硕士研究生,主要从事食品营养与功能研究。E-mail:yzh13919051238@163.com
				
							通讯作者:
					*陈杭君,E-mail:spshangjun@sina.com
							基金资助:
        
               		YANG Zihan1,2(
), WU Weijie2, GAO Yuan2, LIU Ruiling2, SHENTU Xuping1, GAO Haiyan2, CHEN Hangjun2,*(
)
			  
			
			
			
                
        
    
Received:2023-03-29
									
				
									
				
									
				
											Online:2024-02-25
									
				
											Published:2024-03-05
									
			摘要:
为了探讨了莲藕解酒成分的提取工艺条件及其制备的软糖的解酒功效。本研究以莲藕为原料,以乙醇脱氢酶(ADH)体外激活率为指标,通过单因素和正交试验对提取溶剂、料液比、提取时间和提取温度进行研究。对最优提取工艺下的莲藕提取物进行成分分析并以此作为原料制备解酒功能软糖,测定软糖中添加不同浓度莲藕提取液对DPPH自由基、ABTS+自由基和·OH自由基的清除率;建立小鼠醉酒模型评价莲藕功能软糖的醒酒功效。实验结果表明,莲藕解酒成分最佳提取工艺为溶剂选用100%甲醇,料液比1∶40,提取温度60 ℃,提取时间5 h,此工艺下得到的莲藕提取物对ADH体外激活率为(19.60±2.10)%。UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS分析此工艺条件下莲藕提取物有433种成分,主要物质为酚酸和黄酮类物质。莲藕解酒功能软糖对ABTS+自由基、·OH自由基和DPPH自由基清除率的IC50分别为14.59、101.96和5.54 mg·mL-1。动物实验证明莲藕解酒功能软糖可以显著提高(P<0.05)饮酒后小鼠肝脏ADH活性并显著降低(P<0.05)小鼠饮酒后血液中乙醇的含量,同时延长小鼠平均醉酒潜伏时间并缩短醉酒后翻正反射恢复时间。表明莲藕解酒软糖具有一定的解酒效果。本研究结果为开发具有解酒护肝功效的功能性食品提供了新的理论和实践基础。
中图分类号:
杨紫瀚, 吴伟杰, 高原, 刘瑞玲, 申屠旭萍, 郜海燕, 陈杭君. 莲藕解酒功能软糖的制备及功效评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 404-415.
YANG Zihan, WU Weijie, GAO Yuan, LIU Ruiling, SHENTU Xuping, GAO Haiyan, CHEN Hangjun. Preparation and efficacy evaluation of lotus root relieving alcoholism functional gel fudge[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(2): 404-415.
																													图1 不同体积分数的甲醇作为溶剂对莲藕提取物对ADH激活率的影响 不同处理间没有相同小写字母表示差异显著(P<0.05)。下同。
Fig.1 Effect of different volume fractions of methanol as solvent on the activation rate of ethanol dehydrogenase from lotus root extract The data without the same lowecase letters show the significant difference (P<0.05). The same as below.
| 水平 Level  |  A甲醇体积分数 Methanol concentration/%  |  B提取时间 Extraction time/h  |  C提取温度 Extraction temperature/℃  |  D料液比 Solid-liquid ration(m/V)  | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 80 | 3 | 50 | 1∶40 | 
| 2 | 90 | 4 | 60 | 1∶45 | 
| 3 | 100 | 5 | 70 | 1∶50 | 
表1 正交试验因素与水平设计
Table 1 Orthogonal experimental factors and level design
| 水平 Level  |  A甲醇体积分数 Methanol concentration/%  |  B提取时间 Extraction time/h  |  C提取温度 Extraction temperature/℃  |  D料液比 Solid-liquid ration(m/V)  | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 80 | 3 | 50 | 1∶40 | 
| 2 | 90 | 4 | 60 | 1∶45 | 
| 3 | 100 | 5 | 70 | 1∶50 | 
| 试验编号 Test No.  |  因素 Factor  |  ADH激活率 ADH activation rate/%  | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5.30 | 
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7.80 | 
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 7.60 | 
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 13.96 | 
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 11.35 | 
| 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9.81 | 
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 18.31 | 
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 19.17 | 
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 19.60 | 
| k1 | 6.9 | 12.523 | 11.427 | 12.083 | — | 
| k2 | 11.707 | 12.773 | 13.787 | 11.973 | — | 
| k3 | 19.027 | 12.337 | 12.420 | 13.577 | — | 
| R | 12.127 | 0.436 | 2.360 | 1.604 | — | 
表2 正交试验结果
Table 2 Results of orthogonal experiments
| 试验编号 Test No.  |  因素 Factor  |  ADH激活率 ADH activation rate/%  | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5.30 | 
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7.80 | 
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 7.60 | 
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 13.96 | 
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 11.35 | 
| 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9.81 | 
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 18.31 | 
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 19.17 | 
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 19.60 | 
| k1 | 6.9 | 12.523 | 11.427 | 12.083 | — | 
| k2 | 11.707 | 12.773 | 13.787 | 11.973 | — | 
| k3 | 19.027 | 12.337 | 12.420 | 13.577 | — | 
| R | 12.127 | 0.436 | 2.360 | 1.604 | — | 
| 因素 Factor  |  偏差平方和 Square of deviance  |  自由度 Degree of freedom  |  F比 F-ratio  |  F临界值 F marginal value  |  显著性 Significance  | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 223.742 | 2 | 776.882 | 19 | * | 
| B | 0.288 | 2 | 1 | 19 | |
| C | 8.424 | 2 | 29.25 | 19 | * | 
| D | 4.813 | 2 | 16.712 | 19 | |
| 误差Error | 0.29 | 2 | 
表3 莲藕解酒成分提取工艺方差分析
Table 3 Analysis of variance for the extraction process of antidote components from lotus root
| 因素 Factor  |  偏差平方和 Square of deviance  |  自由度 Degree of freedom  |  F比 F-ratio  |  F临界值 F marginal value  |  显著性 Significance  | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 223.742 | 2 | 776.882 | 19 | * | 
| B | 0.288 | 2 | 1 | 19 | |
| C | 8.424 | 2 | 29.25 | 19 | * | 
| D | 4.813 | 2 | 16.712 | 19 | |
| 误差Error | 0.29 | 2 | 
																													图7 不同浓度莲藕提取液对ABTS+自由基(A)、·OH自由基(B)和DPPH自由基(C)清除率的影响
Fig.7 Effects of different concentrations of lotus root extract on ABTS+ free radicals(A), ·OH radical (B) and DPPH free radicals (C) clearance rate
| 分组 Group  |  实验数量/只 Experimental quantity  |  醉酒潜伏时间 The latency time/min  |  翻正反射恢复时间 The recovery time of the positive reflex/min  |  醉酒率 Drunk rate/%  | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型组Model group | 10 | 5.29±1.2 | 150.76±9.31 | 100 | 
| 莲藕提取液干预组Lotus root extract intervention group | 10 | 20.58±6.24* | 53.89±19.51** | 80 | 
表4 莲藕解酒功能软糖解酒效果评价
Table 4 Evaluation of the effect of lotus root relieving alcoholism funcitional gel fudge
| 分组 Group  |  实验数量/只 Experimental quantity  |  醉酒潜伏时间 The latency time/min  |  翻正反射恢复时间 The recovery time of the positive reflex/min  |  醉酒率 Drunk rate/%  | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型组Model group | 10 | 5.29±1.2 | 150.76±9.31 | 100 | 
| 莲藕提取液干预组Lotus root extract intervention group | 10 | 20.58±6.24* | 53.89±19.51** | 80 | 
																													图8 莲藕解酒功能软糖对小鼠血清乙醇含量和肝脏ADH活性的影响
Fig.8 Lotus root relieving alcoholism functional gel fudge on ethanol content in mouse serum and ADH activity in mouse liver
| [1] | 侯景龙, 毛跟年, 胡媛, 等. 葛根、枳椇子解酒组合物体外抗氧化活性的研究[J]. 动物医学进展, 2020, 41(2): 63-69. | 
| HOU J L, MAO G N, HU Y, et al. Study on antioxidant activity in vitro of antialcoholic composition of puerariae and Hovenia dulcis Thunb[J]. Progress in Veterinary Medicine, 2020, 41(2): 63-69. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [2] | 孙小红, 葛建. 荸荠提取物对乙醇脱氢酶活性的影响[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2016, 37(6): 13-17. | 
| SUN X H, GE J. Effect of extraction from Chinese water chestnut (Eleocharis tuberose) on the activity of alcohol dehydrogenase(ADH)[J]. Food Research and Development, 2016, 37(6): 13-17. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [3] | 段佳辉. 忧遁草叶提取物解酒、保肝及抗氧化功能的研究[D]. 无锡: 江南大学, 2019. | 
| DUAN J H. Anti-alcoholism, liver-protection and antioxidant function of extracts from Clinacanthus nutans leaves[D]. Wuxi: Jiangnan University, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [4] | (清)赵学敏. 本草纲目拾遗: 十卷[M]. 新1版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 1963. | 
| [5] | YUAN S, DONG P Y, MA H H, et al. Antioxidant and biological activities of the lotus root polysaccharide-iron (Ⅲ) complex[J]. Molecules, 2022, 27(20): 7106. | 
| [6] | 麻玉莹, 杨忍忍, 高蔚娜, 等. 莲藕活性成分及其生物学功能研究进展[J]. 营养学报, 2020, 42(5): 509-513. | 
| MA Y Y, YANG R R, GAO W N, et al. Research progress on components and biological functions of lotus root[J]. Acta Nutrimenta Sinica, 2020, 42(5): 509-513. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [7] | COLLABORATORS G 2 R F. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990—2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017[J]. Lancet, 2018, 392(10159): 1923-1994. | 
| [8] | GAO Y, CHEN H J, LIU R L, et al. Ameliorating effects of water bamboo shoot (Zizania latifolia) on acute alcoholism in a mice model and its chemical composition[J]. Food Chemistry, 2022, 378: 132122. | 
| [9] | 罗梦兰, 任廷远, 殷明月, 等. 超高效液相色谱-串联三重四极杆质谱法测定阳荷花苞中的化学成分[J]. 现代食品科技, 2022, 38(1): 355-363. | 
| LUO M L, REN T Y, YIN M Y, et al. The chemical components in the buds of Zingiber mioga roscoe detected by ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem triple quadrupole mass spectrometry[J]. Modern Food Science and Technology, 2022, 38(1): 355-363. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [10] | 杨娟, 戴家宁, 梁楚彤, 等. 杜仲凝胶软糖的制备工艺优化[J]. 食品工业科技, 2021, 42(3): 147-152. | 
| YANG J, DAI J N, LIANG C T, et al. Optimization of preparation technology of Eucommia ulmoides gel soft sweets[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(3): 147-152. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [11] | WANG L, LUO Y, WU Y N, et al. Fermentation and complex enzyme hydrolysis for improving the total soluble phenolic contents, flavonoid aglycones contents and bio-activities of guava leaves tea[J]. Food Chemistry, 2018, 264: 189-198. | 
| [12] | LIM S, CHOI A H, KWON M, et al. Evaluation of antioxidant activities of various solvent extract from Sargassum serratifolium and its major antioxidant components[J]. Food Chemistry, 2019, 278: 178-184. | 
| [13] | XIAO Z C, WANG Y L, WANG J X, et al. Structure-antioxidant capacity relationship of dihydrochalcone compounds in Malus[J]. Food Chemistry, 2019, 275: 354-360. | 
| [14] | 胡金宽. 酒速愈对急性酒精中毒小鼠解酒作用及其保护机制研究[D]. 石家庄: 河北医科大学, 2006. | 
| HU J K. Research on alleviating a hangover and protective functional mechanisms of acute alcoholism mice treated with jiusuyu[D]. Shijiazhuang: Hebei Medical University, 2006. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [15] | YANG Z H, GAO Y, WU W J, et al. The mitigative effect of lotus root (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn) extract on acute alcoholism through activation of alcohol catabolic enzyme, reduction of oxidative stress, and protection of liver function[J]. Frontiers in Nutrition, 2023, 9: 1111283. | 
| [16] | 徐树来, 王丽, 任红波, 等. 蒲公英黄酮的提取工艺优化及主要成分浅析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2020, 41(19): 172-178. | 
| XU S L, WANG L, REN H B, et al. Optimization of extraction technology of flavonoids from dandelion and analysis of principal components[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2020, 41(19): 172-178. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [17] | 文雨欣, 李冰, 郑青松, 等. 莲蓬多酚的提取工艺优化、鉴定及抗氧化活性研究[J]. 食品科技, 2021, 46(11): 179-187, 194. | 
| WEN Y X, LI B, ZHENG Q S, et al. Optimization extraction, purification, identification and antioxidant activity of polyphenols from lotus seedpod[J]. Food Science and Technology, 2021, 46(11): 179-187, 194. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [18] | D’ANGELO A, PETRELLA C, GRECO A, et al. Acute alcohol intoxication: a clinical overview[J]. La Clinica Terapeutica, 2022, 173(3): 280-291. | 
| [19] | ANDRÉASSON S, DANIELSSON A K, HALLGREN M. Severity of alcohol dependence in the Swedish adult population: association with consumption and social factors[J]. Alcohol, 2013, 47(1): 21-25. | 
| [20] | 王翰华, 杨晓春. 野葛叶水提物、醇提物对急性酒精中毒小鼠的解酒护肝作用[J]. 中成药, 2018, 40(12): 2744-2747. | 
| WANG H H, YANG X C. Effects of water extract and alcohol extract of Pueraria lobata leaves on relieving alcoholism and protecting liver in mice with acute alcoholism[J]. Chinese Traditional Patent Medicine, 2018, 40(12): 2744-2747. (in Chinese) | |
| [21] | 童钰琴, 李姝, 牛曼思, 等. 苦荞麸皮总黄酮体外抗氧化活性及体内解酒护肝作用[J]. 食品工业科技, 2020, 41(17): 314-319, 326. | 
| TONG Y Q, LI S, NIU M S, et al. Antioxidant activity of total flavonoids from Tartary buckwheat bran in vitro and its effect on antialcoholism and liver protection in vivo[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2020, 41(17): 314-319, 326. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [22] | 周宏炫, 黄颖, 谭书明, 等. 刺梨多酚对急性酒精中毒大鼠的解酒和护肝作用[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(17): 163-169. | 
| ZHOU H X, HUANG Y, TAN S M, et al. Anti-alcoholic and hepatoprotective effects of polyphenols from the fruit of Rosa roxburghii Tratt. in rats with acute alcoholism[J]. Food Science, 2021, 42(17): 163-169. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [23] | FOUAD D, BADR A, ATTIA H A. Hepatoprotective activity of raspberry ketone is mediated via inhibition of the NF-κB/TNF-α/caspase axis and mitochondrial apoptosis in chemically induced acute liver injury[J]. Toxicology Research, 2019, 8(5): 663-676. | 
| [24] | 周庆峰, 康洁, 马亢, 等. 山药多糖对急性酒精中毒小鼠的解酒作用[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2019, 40(19): 113-117. | 
| ZHOU Q F, KANG J, MA K, et al. Anti-alcoholism effects of rhizoma dioscoreae polysaccharide on acute alcohol intoxic mice[J]. Food Research and Development, 2019, 40(19): 113-117. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [25] | CHEN H G, XIAO R X, ZHOU X. Study on the extraction, purification, partial chemical characterization and anti-alcohol liver injury activity of Mori fructus polysaccharides[J]. New Journal of Chemistry, 2020, 44(46): 20060-20070. | 
| [26] | ZHAO H J, WANG Y, MU M Y, et al. Lycopene alleviates sulfamethoxazole-induced hepatotoxicity in grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) via suppression of oxidative stress, inflammation and apoptosis[J]. Food & Function, 2020, 11(10): 8547-8559. | 
| [27] | 邓青芳. 桑椹抗酒精性肝损伤药效作用及其物质基础研究[D]. 贵阳: 贵州师范大学, 2015. | 
| DENG Q F. Pharmacodynamics and material basis studies of fructus Mori against ethanol-induced hepatic injury[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou Normal University, 2015. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [28] | JAYARAMAN J, NAMASIVAYAM N. Naringenin modulates circulatory lipid peroxidation, anti-oxidant status and hepatic alcohol metabolizing enzymes in rats with ethanol induced liver injury[J]. Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology, 2011, 25(6): 682-689. | 
| [29] | HAN Y, XU Q, HU J N, et al. Maltol, a food flavoring agent, attenuates acute alcohol-induced oxidative damage in mice[J]. Nutrients, 2015, 7(1): 682-696. | 
| [30] | DUNN W, SHAH V H. Pathogenesis of alcoholic liver disease[J]. Clinics in Liver Disease, 2016, 20(3): 445-456. | 
| [31] | 郭长江, 韦京豫, 杨继军, 等. 66种蔬菜、水果抗氧化活性的比较研究[J]. 营养学报, 2003, 25(2): 203-207. | 
| GUO C J, WEI J Y, YANG J J, et al. The antioxidant capacity of 66 vegetables and fruits: a comparative study[J]. Acta Nutrimenta Sinica, 2003, 25(2): 203-207. (in Chinese with English abstract) | 
| [1] | 朱潇, 朱颖, 李宏军, 陈善峰. 挤压制备燕麦鹰嘴豆复配米的工艺优化及其品质[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(5): 1149-1158. | 
| [2] | 朱媛媛, 韩延超, 刘瑞玲, 邓尚贵, 陈慧芝, 房祥军, 吴伟杰, 郜海燕. 蟹风味香肠的工艺优化与品质分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(4): 920-933. | 
| [3] | 乔慧茹, 房祥军, 吴伟杰, 刘瑞玲, 陈杭君, 邓尚贵, 沙浩, 郜海燕. 蓝莓与铁皮石斛叶复合乳酸菌发酵饮料工艺优化与品质分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(3): 654-666. | 
| [4] | 赵小亮, 鲁雲, 康兴兴, 龙则宇, 郑晓杰. 雁荡山铁皮石斛多糖的提取、结构表征与体外抗氧化活性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(8): 1898-1908. | 
| [5] | 邵雪, 牛犇, 房祥军, 吴伟杰, 吴来春, 郜海燕, 陈杭君. 方便粥的干燥方式优选与风味优化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(4): 894-904. | 
| [6] | 张喜闻, 郭晓农, 王泽兴, 王亚玲. 不同复合益生菌对藜麦秸秆发酵饲料的发酵工艺优化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(12): 2818-2829. | 
| [7] | 潘旭婕, 刘瑞玲, 邓尚贵, 吴伟杰, 陈杭君, 郜海燕. 乳酸菌发酵杨梅果酱工艺优化及其风味成分分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(7): 1502-1512. | 
| [8] | 周强, 韩延超, 吴伟杰, 丁玉庭, 邵平, 童川, 郜海燕. 山核桃油脂凝胶制备工艺优化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(12): 2390-2396. | 
| [9] | 张翰卿, 刘瑞玲, 吴伟杰, 邓尚贵, 郜海燕, 陈杭君. 苹果多酚对鲜切莲藕品质及褐变的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(9): 1549-1554. | 
| [10] | 范铭, 向露, 刘哲, 陆胜民. 基于体外降糖活性的桑葚渣水提物的超声辅助工艺优化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(3): 480-486. | 
| [11] | 马露, 孔维洲, 王丽萍, 张喜康, 王聪, 李佩佩, 刘敦华. 响应面法优化发酵鹿肉干工艺及其货架期预测[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(12): 2109-2119. | 
| [12] | 周小军1,*,何晓婵1,郑寨生1,张尚法1,孙裕建1,楼兵干2. 莲藕腐败病病原菌生物学特性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(2): 211-. | 
| [13] | 朱凤香;王卫平;陈晓旸;洪春来;吴传珍;薛智勇*. 利用人工湿地栽种水生作物对沼液进行无害化消解[J]. , 2011, 23(2): 0-368. | 
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
| 
												        	全文 | 
											        	
												        	 | 
													|||||
| 
												        	摘要 | 
												        
															 | 
													|||||