蓝藻好氧堆肥负载阿维菌素对草莓红蜘蛛的防治效果

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230914

浙江农业学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (10): 2264-2272.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230914

蓝藻好氧堆肥负载阿维菌素对草莓红蜘蛛的防治效果

燕中立¹^,²(), 李永慧², 李玉成¹^,^*(), 李伟², 张学胜¹, 洪勇², 葛立傲³

1.安徽大学资源与环境工程学院,安徽合肥 230601
2.中科合肥智慧农业协同创新研究院,安徽合肥 231131
3.上海市金山区农业技术推广中心,上海 201599

收稿日期:2023-07-27 出版日期:2024-10-25 发布日期:2024-10-30
作者简介:燕中立(1998—),男,安徽亳州人,硕士研究生,主要从事污染控制与修复研究。E-mail:1666925980@qq.com
通讯作者: ^*李玉成,E-mail:Li-yucheng@163.com
基金资助:
2023肥东县农业面源污染治理试点工作第三方服务项目(一)(K160139421);长丰县2021年数字草莓建设项目(AHSZNY-2021-06);上海市“科技创新行动计划”农业科技项目(21N51900300)

Control effect of aerobic composting with avermectin loaded by cyanobacteria on strawberry red spiders

YAN Zhongli¹^,²(), LI Yonghui², LI Yucheng¹^,^*(), LI Wei², ZHANG Xuesheng¹, HONG Yong², GE Li’ao³

1. School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
2. Hefei Collaborative Innovation Institute of Smart Agriculture, Hefei 231131, China
3. Shanghai Jinshan District Agricultural Technology Promotion Center, Shanghai 201599, China

Received:2023-07-27 Online:2024-10-25 Published:2024-10-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为克服阿维菌素药效时间短等缺点,选用蓝藻、酒糟分别作为阿维菌素的缓释载体和助溶剂,联合农业废弃物——羊粪、稻壳(6∶1)进行混合好氧堆肥,探究其对草莓红蜘蛛的防治效果。试验共设置4个处理配方:阿维菌素水溶液(A)、蓝藻-阿维菌素复合物(B)、酒糟-阿维菌素复合物(C)、蓝藻-酒糟-阿维菌素复合物(D),分别在堆肥的第10、30、50天将其添加到堆肥中(相应编号为1、2、3),继续堆制至有机肥腐熟。腐熟后,将这12组有机肥用于草莓种植,评估各组对红蜘蛛的防治效果,并对基质和草莓中残留的阿维菌素、微囊藻毒素进行安全性评价。结果表明: B、D两组处理对草莓红蜘蛛的防治效果显著(P<0.05)高于未添加蓝藻的A、C两组,各处理相比,D3的防效最佳,在2023年4月7日和14日分别达到79.09%和71.07%。试验条件下,基质和草莓中残留的阿维菌素、微囊藻毒素安全风险较低。综上,利用蓝藻负载阿维菌素提高阿维菌素对草莓红蜘蛛的防治效果安全可行。

关键词: 蓝藻, 阿维菌素, 好氧堆肥, 红蜘蛛, 防治效果, 安全性评价

Abstract:

In order to solve the shortcomings of avermectin, such as short efficacy time, cyanobacteria and vinasse were selected as the slow-release carrier and co-solvent of avermectin for composting with the agricultural waste sheep manure and rice husk (6∶1) to explore its control effect on strawberry red spiders. Four organic fertilizer formulas were set up: avermectin aqueous solution (A), cyanobacteria-avermectin complex (B), vinasse-avermectin complex(C), and cyanobacteria-vinasse-avermectin complex(D), which were added to the composting of sheep manure and rice husk on the 10th, 30th and 50th days (denoted as 1, 2, 3, respectively), respectively. After maturity, the 12 groups of composting products were used for strawberry planting, and the actual control effect of each group against red spiders was evaluated, as well as the safety of avermectin and microcystin residues in the substrate and strawberry. The results showed that the control effect of formulas B and D was significantly (P<0.05) superior to that of formulas A and C without addition of cyanobacteria. Compared with the other treatments, treatment D3 exhibited the highest control effect of 79.09% and 71.07% on April 7th and 14th, 2023, respectively. Under the experiment conditions, the risk of avermectin and microcystin residues in the substrate and strawberry was low. In conclusion, it was feasible and safe to improve the control effect of avermectin against strawberry red spiders by aerobic composting with cyanobacteria.

Key words: cyanobacteria, avermectin, aerobic composting, red spider, control effect, safety evaluation

中图分类号:

燕中立, 李永慧, 李玉成, 李伟, 张学胜, 洪勇, 葛立傲. 蓝藻好氧堆肥负载阿维菌素对草莓红蜘蛛的防治效果[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(10): 2264-2272.

YAN Zhongli, LI Yonghui, LI Yucheng, LI Wei, ZHANG Xuesheng, HONG Yong, GE Li’ao. Control effect of aerobic composting with avermectin loaded by cyanobacteria on strawberry red spiders[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(10): 2264-2272.

图/表 4

参考文献 48

[1]	LIU Y Z, LIU S P, HUANG C H, et al. Chinese Baijiu distiller’s grains resourcing: current progress and future prospects[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2022, 176: 105900.
[2]	胡旭, 吴耀领, 李巧玉, 等. 酒糟堆肥化再利用研究进展[J]. 酿酒科技, 2023(3): 110-114.
	HU X, WU Y L, LI Q Y, et al. Research progress in the production of organic fertilizer by distillers grains[J]. Liquor-Making Science & Technology, 2023(3): 110-114. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	LIVINALI E, SPEROTTO R A, FERLA N J, et al. Physicochemical and nutritional alterations induced by two-spotted spider mite infestation on strawberry plants[J]. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 2014, 17(5): 193-198.
[4]	胡青平, 展阳, 周学永. 我国微生物源农药研究概述[J]. 智慧农业导刊, 2022, 2(4): 5-8.
	HU Q P, ZHAN Y, ZHOU X Y. An overview of the research on microbial pesticides in China[J]. Journal of Smart Agriculture, 2022, 2(4): 5-8. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	BAI S H, OGBOURNE S. Eco-toxicological effects of the avermectin family with a focus on abamectin and ivermectin[J]. Chemosphere, 2016, 154: 204-214.
[6]	王兰, 冯宏祖. 阿维菌素类杀虫剂的研究及应用前景[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2008, 28(4): 13-15.
	WANG L, FENG H Z. Prospects on the resarch and application of insecticides: avermectin[J]. China Plant Protection, 2008, 28(4): 13-15. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	华乃震, 华纯. 生物杀虫剂的进展和应用[J]. 农药, 2011, 50(7): 469-473.
	HUA N Z, HUA C. Progress and application of biological insecticide[J]. Agrochemicals, 2011, 50(7): 469-473. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	吴传万, 杜小凤, 王伟中, 等. 阿维菌素光分解及其光稳定剂的筛选[J]. 农药, 2006, 45(12): 828-830.
	WU C W, DU X F, WANG W Z, et al. Photolysis of abamectin and screening the photostabilizers[J]. Agrochemicals, 2006, 45(12): 828-830. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	YAN Y F, HOU H W, REN T R, et al. Utilization of environmental waste cyanobacteria as a pesticide carrier: studies on controlled release and photostability of avermectin[J]. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2013, 102: 341-347.
[10]	SINGH A, DHIMAN N, KAR A K, et al. Advances in controlled release pesticide formulations: prospects to safer integrated pest management and sustainable agriculture[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 385: 121525.
[11]	张晋天, 张慧学, 马忠华, 等. 缓/控释农药研究及其应用进展[J]. 湖南师范大学自然科学学报, 2022, 45(5): 117-123.
	ZHANG J T, ZHANG H X, MA Z H, et al. Progress and application of slow/controlled release of pesticides[J]. Journal of Natural Science of Hunan Normal University, 2022, 45(5): 117-123. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	陈慧萍, 曹立冬, 赵鹏跃, 等. 阿维菌素缓控释载药体系的构建及应用研究进展[J]. 农药学学报, 2021, 23(1): 42-59.
	CHEN H P, CAO L D, ZHAO P Y, et al. Research progress of construction and application of sustained and controlled release systems of avermectin[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2021, 23(1): 42-59. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	SINHA R P, HÄDER D P. UV-protectants in cyanobacteria[J]. Plant Science, 2008, 174(3): 278-289.
[14]	BAIRWA H K, PRAJAPAT G, JAIN S, et al. Evaluation of UV-B protection efficiency of mycosporine like amino acid extracted from the cyanobacteria Anabaenopsis sp. SLCyA isolated from a hypersaline lake[J]. Bioresource Technology Reports, 2021, 15: 100749.
[15]	SINGH J S, KUMAR A, SINGH M. Cyanobacteria: a sustainable and commercial bio-resource in production of bio-fertilizer and bio-fuel from waste waters[J]. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 2019, 3: 100008.
[16]	吴青海, 张博, 艾丽娟, 等. 蓝藻生物资源的开发与应用[J]. 上海化工, 2011, 36(9): 6-12.
	WU Q H, ZHANG B, AI L J, et al. Development and application of cyanobacteria biological resources[J]. Shanghai Chemical Industry, 2011, 36(9): 6-12. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	侯宏伟, 任天瑞, 燕云峰, 等. 蓝藻为载体的阿维菌素抗紫外缓释剂的制备及其性能[J]. 过程工程学报, 2011, 11(5): 846-850.
	HOU H W, REN T R, YAN Y F, et al. Preparation of anti-UV controlled release formulation of avermectin with carrier of blue algae and its property[J]. The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering, 2011, 11(5): 846-850. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	任云, 崔春红, 刘奋武, 等. 蓝藻好氧堆肥及其氮素损失控制的研究[J]. 环境科学, 2012, 33(5): 1760-1766.
	REN Y, CUI C H, LIU F W, et al. Study on composting of cyanobacteria amended with different N loss inhibitor[J]. Environmental Science, 2012, 33(5): 1760-1766. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	汪晶晶, 邓威, 方梦萦, 等. 水分含量对蓝藻堆肥腐熟及藻毒素含量的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(2): 403-410.
	WANG J J, DENG W, FANG M Y, et al. Influence of water content on the maturity and content of microcystin in cyanobacteria composting[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2020, 39(2): 403-410. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	斯鑫鑫, 唐尚柱, 赵晓海, 等. 蓝藻有机富硒肥的研制及其在普通白菜种植中的应用[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2021, 37(2): 340-347.
	SI X X, TANG S Z, ZHAO X H, et al. Development of selenium-enriched cyanobacteria organic fertilizer and its application in bok choy planting[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 37(2): 340-347. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	韩磊, 杨超然, 樊荣, 等. 几种杀菌剂对白菜霜霉病的防治效果[J]. 农药, 2019, 58(12): 915-917.
	HAN L, YANG C R, FAN R, et al. Effects of several fungicides on the control of Chinese cabbage downy mildew[J]. Agrochemicals, 2019, 58(12): 915-917. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	庾琴, 郭晓君, 封云涛, 等. 6种杀虫剂对南美番茄潜叶蛾的毒力及田间防效[J]. 生物安全学报, 2022, 31(4): 345-350.
	YU Q, GUO X J, FENG Y T, et al. Toxicity of six insecticides on Tuta absoluta(Meyrick) and control efficacy in field trials[J]. Journal of Biosafety, 2022, 31(4): 345-350. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	陈柳裕, 李涛, 杨培丽, 等. 不同药剂对柑橘红蜘蛛的防治效果研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2019(4): 90.
	CHEN L Y, LI T, YANG P L, et al. Study on the control effect of different pesticides on citrus red spider[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019(4): 90. (in Chinese)
[24]	周龙, 杨德荣, 曾志伟. 柑橘病虫害的分类分级调查方法[J]. 特种经济动植物, 2020, 23(5): 48-52.
	ZHOU L, YANG D R, ZENG Z W. Classification and grading investigation method of citrus diseases and insect pests[J]. Special Economic Animal and Plant, 2020, 23(5): 48-52. (in Chinese)
[25]	宁赢, 彭秧锡, 欧晓明, 等. 高效液相色谱-荧光法测定阿维菌素在稻田环境基质中的残留[J]. 精细化工中间体, 2014, 44(3): 66-69.
	NING Y, PENG Y X, OU X M, et al. Determination of abamectin residues in paddy field environmental matrices by high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detector[J]. Fine Chemical Intermediates, 2014, 44(3): 66-69. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	DIONISIO A C, RATH S. Abamectin in soils: analytical methods, kinetics, sorption and dissipation[J]. Chemosphere, 2016, 151: 17-29.
[27]	李彦文, 黄献培, 吴小莲, 等. 固相萃取-高效液相色谱串联质谱法同时测定土壤中3种微囊藻毒素[J]. 分析化学, 2013, 41(1): 88-92.
	LI Y W, HUANG X P, WU X L, et al. Simultaneous extraction and determination of three microcystins from soil using solid phase extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2013, 41(1): 88-92. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	李彦文. 典型微囊藻毒素在土壤-蔬菜系统中的污染特征与毒性研究[D]. 广州: 暨南大学, 2015.
	LI Y W. Study on pollution characteristics and toxicity of typical microcystins in soil-vegetable system[D]. Guangzhou: Jinan University, 2015. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	CORDEIRO-ARAÚJO M K, CHIA M A, DE TOLEDO ARRUDA-NETO J D, et al. Microcystin-LR bioaccumulation and depuration kinetics in lettuce and arugula: human health risk assessment[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 566: 1379-1386.
[30]	CASTANHA ZANOLI J C, MAIOLI M A, MEDEIROS H C D, et al. Abamectin affects the bioenergetics of liver mitochondria: a potential mechanism of hepatotoxicity[J]. Toxicology in Vitro, 2012, 26(1): 51-56.
[31]	WERALUPITIYA C, WANIGATUNGE R P, GUNAWARDANA D, et al. Cyanotoxins uptake and accumulation in crops: phytotoxicity and implications on human health[J]. Toxicon, 2022, 211: 21-35.
[32]	PAN C, QIN H X, YAN M H, et al. Environmental microcystin exposure triggers the poor prognosis of prostate cancer: evidence from case-control, animal, and in vitro studies[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2023, 127: 69-81.
[33]	郝雨阳, 宋鹏, 徐彦军, 等. 苏州生态涵养区农业土壤中农药残留的分布特征及风险评估[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2023, 42(9): 1974-1982.
	HAO Y Y, SONG P, XU Y J, et al. Residue distribution and risk assessment of pesticides in the farmland soil of Suzhou ecological conservation area[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2023, 42(9): 1974-1982. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34]	PALMA P, KÖCK-SCHULMEYER M, ALVARENGA P, et al. Risk assessment of pesticides detected in surface water of the Alqueva Reservoir (Guadiana basin, southern of Portugal)[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2014, 488: 208-219.
[35]	邓勋飞, 詹宇, 王祥云, 等. 蔬菜地农药施用的土壤生态风险评估[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2014, 33(10): 1920-1927.
	DENG X F, ZHAN Y, WANG X Y, et al. Soil ecological risk assessment of pesticides in vegetable fields[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2014, 33(10): 1920-1927. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36]	詹晓静, 向垒, 李彦文, 等. 农田土壤中微囊藻毒素污染特征及风险评价[J]. 中国环境科学, 2015, 35(7): 2129-2136.
	ZHAN X J, XIANG L, LI Y W, et al. Investigation and risk evaluation of microcystins in agricultural soils[J]. China Environmental Science, 2015, 35(7): 2129-2136. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37]	张亚辉, 曹莹, 周腾耀, 等. 我国环境中PFOS的预测无效应浓度[J]. 中国环境科学, 2013, 33(9): 1670-1677.
	ZHANG Y H, CAO Y, ZHOU T Y, et al. Predicted non-effect concentrations for PFOS of environment in China[J]. China Environmental Science, 2013, 33(9): 1670-1677. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[38]	WOLF H U, FRANK C. Toxicity assessment of cyanobacterial toxin mixtures[J]. Environmental Toxicology, 2002, 17(4): 395-399.
[39]	CHEN W, SONG L R, GAN N Q, et al. Sorption,degradation and mobility of microcystins in Chinese agriculture soils: risk assessment for groundwater protection[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2006, 144(3): 752-758.
[40]	金征宇. 食品安全导论[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2005.
[41]	延妮, 王文思, 史册, 等. 草莓农药残留风险评估[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(15): 200-204.
	YAN N, WANG W S, SHI C, et al. Strawberry pesticide residue risk assessment[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(15): 200-204. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[42]	王冬群, 吴华新, 沈群超, 等. 慈溪市水果有机磷农药残留调查及风险评估[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2012, 40(2): 229-231.
	WANG D Q, WU H X, SHEN Q C, et al. Investigation and risk assessment of organophosphorus pesticide residues in fruits in Cixi City[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 40(2): 229-231. (in Chinese)
[43]	李灵章, 刘卓成, 余雨泽, 等. 农作物秸秆与畜禽粪便组合的好氧堆肥理化性状研究[J]. 草原与草坪, 2019, 39(6): 49-57.
	LI L Z, LIU Z C, YU Y Z, et al. Comparative study on aerobic composting of the combination among crop stalk and livestock manure[J]. Grassland and Turf, 2019, 39(6): 49-57. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[44]	张文浩, 门梦琪, 许本姝, 等. 牛粪稻秸新型静态堆肥中真菌群落组成的动态特征[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2018, 37(9): 2029-2036.
	ZHANG W H, MEN M Q, XU B S, et al. Dynamic characteristics of the composition of the fungal community in a novel static composting system of dairy manure and rice straw[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2018, 37(9): 2029-2036. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[45]	李哲. 酒糟有机肥生产、肥效以及酒糟生物质炭的效应研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2021.
	LI Z. Production and fertilizer efficiency of organic fertilizer made from vinasse and effect of biochar made from vinasse[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[46]	王亚飞, 李梦婵, 邱慧珍, 等. 不同畜禽粪便堆肥的微生物数量和养分含量的变化[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2017, 52(3): 37-45.
	WANG Y F, LI M C, QIU H Z, et al. Changes of microbial quantity and nutrient content in different composting of livestock manure[J]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2017, 52(3): 37-45. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[47]	王玉楼, 熊圣国, 杨迎春, 等. 草莓定植后绿色防控关键技术分析[J]. 种子科技, 2023, 41(6): 117-119.
	WANG Y L, XIONG S G, YANG Y C, et al. Analysis on key technologies of green prevention and control after strawberry planting[J]. Seed Science & Technology, 2023, 41(6): 117-119. (in Chinese)
[48]	李俊辉, 韩煜晖, 桂赟, 等. 普通白菜中4种常用农药残留及风险评估[J]. 现代农业科技, 2018(4): 117-118.
	LI J H, HAN Y H, GUI Y, et al. Residue and risk assessment of four pesticides in common Chinese cabbage[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018(4): 117-118. (in Chinese with English abstract)

处理 Treatment	2023-04-07试验结果 Test results on 2023-04-07		2023-04-14试验结果 Test results on 2023-04-14
处理 Treatment	虫情指数 Pest situation index	防效 Control effect/%	虫情指数 Pest situation index	防效 Control effect/%
A1	4.59±0.03	0.68±0.74 j	4.91±0.04	1.03±0.89 g
A2	4.38±0.05	5.21±0.99 i	4.73±0.07	4.64±1.41 ef
A3	4.50±0.05	2.51±0.98 j	4.85±0.06	2.20±1.12 fg
B1	1.64±0.04	64.41±0.88 f	2.34±0.06	52.85±1.21 d
B2	1.41±0.07	69.52±1.55 d	2.05±0.14	58.71±2.88 c
B3	1.20±0.06	74.05±1.30 b	1.54±0.09	68.96±1.81 ab
C1	4.50±0.09	2.66±1.84 j	4.92±0.04	0.89±0.79 g
C2	4.27±0.07	7.62±1.41 h	4.74±0.08	4.44±1.52 ef
C3	4.16±0.04	9.96±0.87 g	4.63±0.07	6.62±1.44 e
D1	1.53±0.07	66.89±1.42 e	1.98±0.08	60.05±1.53 c
D2	1.30±0.06	71.86±1.21c	1.66±0.07	66.45±1.43 b
D3	0.97±0.04	79.09±0.76 a	1.43±0.06	71.07±1.22 a
CK	4.62±0.07	—	4.99±0.12	—

处理 Treatment	2023-04-07试验结果 Test results on 2023-04-07		2023-04-14试验结果 Test results on 2023-04-14
处理 Treatment	虫情指数 Pest situation index	防效 Control effect/%	虫情指数 Pest situation index	防效 Control effect/%
A1	4.59±0.03	0.68±0.74 j	4.91±0.04	1.03±0.89 g
A2	4.38±0.05	5.21±0.99 i	4.73±0.07	4.64±1.41 ef
A3	4.50±0.05	2.51±0.98 j	4.85±0.06	2.20±1.12 fg
B1	1.64±0.04	64.41±0.88 f	2.34±0.06	52.85±1.21 d
B2	1.41±0.07	69.52±1.55 d	2.05±0.14	58.71±2.88 c
B3	1.20±0.06	74.05±1.30 b	1.54±0.09	68.96±1.81 ab
C1	4.50±0.09	2.66±1.84 j	4.92±0.04	0.89±0.79 g
C2	4.27±0.07	7.62±1.41 h	4.74±0.08	4.44±1.52 ef
C3	4.16±0.04	9.96±0.87 g	4.63±0.07	6.62±1.44 e
D1	1.53±0.07	66.89±1.42 e	1.98±0.08	60.05±1.53 c
D2	1.30±0.06	71.86±1.21c	1.66±0.07	66.45±1.43 b
D3	0.97±0.04	79.09±0.76 a	1.43±0.06	71.07±1.22 a
CK	4.62±0.07	—	4.99±0.12	—

处理 Treatment	基质中的含量 Content in substrates/(mg·kg^-1)	RQ
A1	0.008	0.000 25
A2	1.029	0.031 18
A3	1.481	0.044 89
B1	0.902	0.027 34
B2	1.016	0.030 78
B3	2.238	0.067 82
C1	2.124	0.064 35
C2	2.152	0.065 21
C3	2.167	0.065 66
D1	1.016	0.030 80
D2	2.456	0.074 42
D3	4.576	0.138 66

处理 Treatment	基质中的含量 Content in substrates/(mg·kg^-1)	RQ
A1	0.008	0.000 25
A2	1.029	0.031 18
A3	1.481	0.044 89
B1	0.902	0.027 34
B2	1.016	0.030 78
B3	2.238	0.067 82
C1	2.124	0.064 35
C2	2.152	0.065 21
C3	2.167	0.065 66
D1	1.016	0.030 80
D2	2.456	0.074 42
D3	4.576	0.138 66

蓝藻好氧堆肥负载阿维菌素对草莓红蜘蛛的防治效果

Control effect of aerobic composting with avermectin loaded by cyanobacteria on strawberry red spiders

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 48

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王佳丽, 王梓宇, 马咏琪, 唐德富, 孙丽坤. 氮素转化菌群对牛粪好氧堆肥的保氮效果[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(1): 177-186.
[2]	潘亚杰, 常会庆, 宋盼盼. 规模化猪场粪便养分特征与堆肥过程中填料添加的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(7): 1690-1698.
[3]	王晓楠, 冯晓晓, 施斌, 陈恩磊, 陈梦丽, 郑永利, 吴慧明. 内生细菌ZN-S10的鉴定及其对番茄青枯病菌的抑菌作用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(11): 2636-2644.
[4]	景亮亮, 柴军发, 高强, 曹爽, 洪波, 贾彦霞. 6种喷雾助剂对3种药剂表面张力与接触角的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(10): 1823-1833.
[5]	黄健, 肖建中, 唐世刚, 郑强, 丁枫华, 张东旭. 添加蒙脱石对猪粪好氧堆肥腐熟度和重金属钝化的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(1): 141-148.
[6]	林瑞, 任海英, 安笑笑, 郑锡良, 梁森苗, 张淑文, 戚行江. 生物有机肥对杨梅凋萎病防控及其树势恢复的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(7): 1096-1104.
[7]	王小冬, 刘兴国, 陆诗敏, 车轩, 朱浩, 刘翀, 朱林. 高营养盐水平下葡萄糖添加对微囊藻水华的控制[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(1): 150-158.
[8]	吴珍珍，舒增年，黄健*. 以菇渣和猪粪为调理剂的城市污泥堆肥效果研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(12): 2171-.
[9]	胡选祥1，邵美红1，洪文英2，吴燕君2，柯汉云1，赵帅锋1. 丁氟螨酯在草莓中的残留消解动态及安全性评价 [J]. 浙江农业学报, 2014, 26(6): 1558-.
[10]	蒲占湑;黄振东;胡秀荣;李红叶;. 六种杀菌剂对柑橘炭疽病菌的室内毒力和田间防治效果[J]. , 2014, 26(1): 0-126.
[11]	陈若霞;金树权;*;周金波;林斌;王耀德. 生活污泥猪粪混合好氧堆肥技术研究[J]. , 2012, 24(3): 0-489.
[12]	刘金凤;吴慧明;马新生;丁伟;*. 2种不同剂型阿维菌素在土壤和田水中的消解动态[J]. , 2011, 23(4): 0-770.
[13]	陈桂华;郑许松;盛仙俏;吴降星;张发成;吕仲贤. 四种防治模式对水稻主要害虫的防治效果及其经济效益分析[J]. , 2008, 20(5): 0-384.
[14]	徐福寿;陈瑞;李克诚;祝小祥 . 不同农药混配组合对稻飞虱防治效果的评价[J]. , 2007, 19(3): 0-240.
[15]	赵华;徐浩;叶兴祥 . 甲胺磷等三种农药对土壤微生物的影响及安全性评价[J]. , 2004, 16(5): 0-316.