湖北环神农架区域烤烟中性致香物质分析

›› 2010, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4): 0-494.

• 论文 •

湖北环神农架区域烤烟中性致香物质分析

于建军¹,刘茜¹,王鹏²,宋文峰¹,马飞跃³

¹河南农业大学烟草学院,河南郑州450002；²湖北中烟工业有限责任公司, 湖北武汉430050；³皖南烟叶有限责任公司,安徽宣城 242000

收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2010-07-25 发布日期:2010-07-25

Analysis on neutral aroma components of flue-cured tobacco from Shennongjia region of Hubei Province

YU Jian-jun;LIU Qian;WANG Peng;SONG Wen-feng;MA Fei-yue

¹College of Tobacco, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002,China; ² Hubei Branch of China Tobacco Industrial Corporation, Wuhan 430051,China; ³Wannan Tobacco Co.,Ltd, Xuancheng 242000,China

Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2010-07-25 Published:2010-07-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对湖北环神农架烟区烤烟样品进行中性致香物质分析,并与津巴布韦优质烟样进行比对,结果表明：房县、保康、兴山地区烟叶的致香物质已基本达到或超过津巴布韦水平,神农架地区与津巴布韦相比差距稍大；在该区域的生态条件下,烤烟种植品种‘K326’的中性致香物质含量高于‘云烟87’；烟叶部位间上部叶(B2F)中性致香物质含量最高,中部叶(C3F)次之,下部叶(X2F)最低。

关键词: 环神农架区域, 烤烟, 中性致香物质

Abstract: The neutral aroma components of flue-cured tobacco samples from Shennongjia tobacco-growing region of Hubei Province were analyzed and compared with the high-quality tobacco samples from Zimbabwe. The results indicated that the neutral aroma component contents of flue-cured tobacco samples from Fangxian, Baokang and Xingshan regions basically reached or exceeded those from Zimbabwe, but there was more obvious difference between samples from Shennongjia region and Zimbabwe. The neutral aroma component contents of K326 were more than Yunyan87 in the ecological condition of Shennongjia region. Moreover, the contents of neutral aroma components showed difference in different leaf position, indicating the upper leaf (B2F) was the highest, the middle leaf (C3F) took the second place, and the lower leaf (X2F)was the lowest.

Key words: Shennongjia region, flue-cured tobacco, neutral aroma component

于建军;刘茜;王鹏;宋文峰;马飞跃. 湖北环神农架区域烤烟中性致香物质分析[J]. , 2010, 22(4): 0-494.

YU Jian-jun;LIU Qian;WANG Peng;SONG Wen-feng;MA Fei-yue. Analysis on neutral aroma components of flue-cured tobacco from Shennongjia region of Hubei Province[J]. , 2010, 22(4): 0-494.

[1]	鲁黎明, 曾孝敏, 顾会战, 张启莉, 喻晓, 王栋, 何佶弦, 李立芹. 施氮量对烤烟氮代谢关键酶基因表达及代谢产物的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(3): 454-460.
[2]	李静静，丁松爽，李艳平，云菲，阎海涛，王志萌，刘国顺*. 生物炭与氮肥配施对烤烟干物质积累及土壤生物学特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(1): 96-.
[3]	敖金成1，罗华元2，张晓龙1，陈初2，毛春堂1，吕凯1，李卫保3，资文华1，*. 玉米秸秆还田方式对初烤烟叶品质及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(8): 1456-.
[4]	刘智炫1，周清明2，黎娟2，*，陈佳亮1，陈焘2，王建波2，刘卉2. 湖南烟区不同年份烤烟化学成分的变化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(11): 1877-.
[5]	代晓燕;郭春燕;刘国顺;*;曹晓涛;李佳. 钾肥不同追施时期对烤烟品质和产量的影响[J]. , 2014, 26(2): 0-421426.
[6]	肖明礼;杨庆;林锐峰;普元柱;*;包秀萍;李仙. 风味蛋白酶提升烟叶抽吸品质的研究[J]. , 2014, 26(1): 0-185.
[7]	蔡雪姣;陈建军;吕永华;邓世媛;陈泽鹏;陈永明;王维;*. 不同土壤类型烟叶组织结构及化学成分的差异比较[J]. , 2013, 25(6): 0-1182.
[8]	闫洪洋;刘春奎;闫洪喜;贾琳;闫克玉;*;孔旭. 河南主产烟区烤烟感官质量比较及其聚类分析[J]. , 2013, 25(4): 0-700.
[9]	何景福;段卫东;张大纯;赵云飞;胡战军;孙曙光;叶协锋;*. 河南植烟土壤与烟叶矿质元素关系分析[J]. , 2013, 25(1): 0-146.
[10]	齐飞;刘国顺;*;杜绍明;王建安;史宏志;张蕊;高卫锴. 临沧市不同基因型烤烟品种的适应性研究[J]. , 2011, 23(4): 0-675.
[11]	李中民;杨铁钊*;段旺军;李亚培. 不同基因型烤烟苗期氮代谢对相关酶活性的影响[J]. , 2011, 23(3): 0-474.
[12]	张朝辉;王豹祥;席淑雅;刘天翔;曹育博;邱立友;*. 一株烤烟根际解钾细菌的鉴定及其在烤烟生产中的应用[J]. , 2011, 23(3): 0-558.
[13]	于建军;闫鼎;叶贤文;马云明;卫盼盼;刘茜. 重庆地区烤烟主要化学成分与评吸质量分析[J]. , 2010, 22(5): 669-672.
[14]	刘培玉;王新发;汪健;闫启峰;石刚;杨铁钊;*. 不同生态地区烤烟主要致香物质含量的变化[J]. , 2010, 22(2): 0-243.
[15]	于建军;郭玮;毕庆文;王海明;黎根;冯先情. 烤烟主要化学成分因子分析和综合评价[J]. , 2010, 22(2): 0-248.

湖北环神农架区域烤烟中性致香物质分析

Analysis on neutral aroma components of flue-cured tobacco from Shennongjia region of Hubei Province

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价