Rural residential land reform and promotion of farmers' income: based on panel data of 6 pilot counties (cities, districts) with difference-in-difference analysis

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2020.08.18

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (8): 1475-1484.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2020.08.18

• Agricultural Economy and Development • Previous Articles Next Articles

Rural residential land reform and promotion of farmers' income: based on panel data of 6 pilot counties (cities, districts) with difference-in-difference analysis

ZHANG Gongwang^a, ZHU Mingfen^b,*

a. Department of Sociology, Hangzhou Administration College, Hangzhou 310024, China;
b. Hangzhou Research Institute, Hangzhou Administration College, Hangzhou 310024, China

Received:2020-02-27 Online:2020-08-25 Published:2020-08-28

Abstract

Abstract: Based on 885 households panel data from 6 pilot counties (cities, districts) of rural residential land reform, propensity score matching and difference-in-difference approach were applied to analyze the influence of rural residential land reform on farmers' income increase under the control of household fixed effect and year fixed effect, with farmers' annual per capita income and annual per capita property income as explanatory variables. It was shown that the rural residential land reform could increase farmers' annual per capita property income, but it had no significant impact on farmers' annual per capita income. In order to promote farmers' income through rural residential land reform, measures should be focused on how to promote farmer's property income. Therefore, suggestions were proposed including promoting urbanization, applying market mechanism and offering other related supporting reform measures.

Key words: rural residential land reform, farmers' income increase, difference-in-difference

CLC Number:

S-9
F321.32

ZHANG Gongwang, ZHU Mingfen. Rural residential land reform and promotion of farmers' income: based on panel data of 6 pilot counties (cities, districts) with difference-in-difference analysis[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2020, 32(8): 1475-1484.

References

[1] 刘同山. 农村宅基地制度改革: 演进、成就与挑战[J]. 农林经济管理学报, 2018, 17(6):707-716.
LIU T S. Reform of rural homestead system: progress, achievements and challenges[J].Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management, 2018, 17(6):707-716.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] 北京市大兴等33县市区拟试点农村土地制度改革[EB/OL]. (2015-02-26) [2020-02-27].
[3] 李国祥. 农村宅基地改革要守住三条底线[J]. 农村经营管理, 2017(5):26-27.
LI G X. The reform of the rural residential land system should keep the three bottom lines[J].Management and Administration on Rural Cooperative, 2017(5):26-27.(in Chinese)
[4] 党国英. 论农村宅基地制度改革的正当性基础与深化策略[J]. 新视野, 2016(5):46-52.
DANG G Y. Study on the legitimacy foundation and deepening strategy of the rural residential land system reform[J].Expanding Horizons, 2016(5):46-52.(in Chinese)
[5] 刘守英, 熊雪锋. 经济结构变革、村庄转型与宅基地制度变迁: 四川省泸县宅基地制度改革案例研究[J]. 中国农村经济, 2018(6):2-20.
LIU S Y, XIONG X F. Changes in economic structure, village transformation and changes in homestead system: a case study of homestead system reform in Luxian County, Sichuan Province[J].Chinese Rural Economy, 2018(6):2-20.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] 鲍建平. 农村宅基地入市交易的 “义乌智慧”[J]. 浙江国土资源, 2018(1):16-18.
BAO J P. The ‘Yiwu's wisdom’ of rural residential land market trading[J].Zhejinag Land & Resources, 2018(1):16-18.(in Chinese)
[7] 叶红玲. “宅改”造就新农村: 大理、义乌宅基地制度改革试点探析[J]. 中国土地, 2018(5): 4-12.
YE H L. ‘Rural residential land reform’ creates new countryside: a pilot analysis of Dali and Yiwu rural residential land system reform[J].Chinese Land, 2018(5): 4-12. (in Chinese)
[8] 孔祥智. 宅基地改革:政策沿革和发展方向[J]. 农村金融研究, 2018, 464(11):9-13.
KONG X Z. Rural residential land system reform: policy evolution and development direction[J].Rural Finance Research, 2018, 464(11):9-13. (in Chinese)
[9] 贺雪峰, 华生. 不必着急让农民退出宅基地[N]. 第一财经日报, 2016-06-23(A11).
[10] 贺雪峰. 农村宅基地“三权分置”改革能收获什么[J]. 决策, 2018(7):13.
HE X F. What can be harvested from the ‘three property right power separation’ in rural residential land reform[J].Decision-Making, 2018(7):13.(in Chinese)
[11] 范思婕, 张彼西, 张文秀. 农村宅基地改革综合绩效模糊评价:以成都市为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2014, 35(2):132-137.
FAN S J, ZHANG B X, ZHANG W X. Fuzzy evaluation on comprehensive performance of rural homestead reform: taking Chengdu City as an example[J].Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2014, 35(2): 132-137. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] 吴九兴, 王晓妹. 农村宅基地退出前后农户福利变化: 基于安徽金寨农户问卷调查[J]. 土地经济研究, 2017(1):63-76.
WU J X, WANG X M. Farmers' welfare change before and after rural homestead withdrawal: based on the survey of farmers in Jinzhai County, Anhui Province[J].Journal of Land Economics, 2017(1):63-76.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] 于伟, 刘本城, 宋金平. 城镇化进程中农户宅基地退出的决策行为及影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(3):551-560.
YU W, LIU B C, SONG J P. A study on farmers' willingness to quit rural residential lands and its influencing factors[J].Geographical Research, 2016, 35(3):551-560.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] 胡银根, 吴欣, 王聪, 等. 农户宅基地有偿退出与有偿使用决策行为影响因素研究: 基于传统农区宜城市的实证[J]. 中国土地科学, 2018, 32(11):22-29.
HU Y G, WU X, WANG C, et al. The impact factors of rural household decision-making behavior of rural residential land paid-exit and paid-use: evidence from the traditional agricultural regions of Yicheng City[J].China Land Science, 2018, 32(11):22-29.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] 高欣, 张安录, 李超. 社会保障,非农收入预期与宅基地退出决策行为: 基于上海市金山区、松江区等经济发达地区的实证分析[J]. 中国土地科学, 2016, 30(6):89-97.
GAO X, ZHANG A L, LI C. Social security, expectation of the non-agricultural income and decision-making behavior of the rural residential land exit: based on the empirical research on developed area of Jinshan District and Songjiang District in Shanghai[J].China Land Science, 2016, 30(6):89-97.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] 范建双, 虞晓芬. 浙江农村“三权”改革背景下农户宅基地空间置换意愿的影响因素[J]. 经济地理, 2016, 36(1):135-142.
FAN J S, YU X F. Research on influential factors of farmers' willingness of rural residential land circulation under the perspective of “three rights” revolution: based on survey data of farmers in Zhejiang Province[J].Economic Geography, 2016, 36(1):135-142.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[17] DE GROOT C, DAALHUIZEN F B C, VAN DAM F, et al. Once an outsider, always an outsider?: the accessibility of the Dutch rural housing market among locals and non-locals[J].Journal of Rural Studies, 2012, 28(3):302-313.
[18] 姚如青, 朱明芬. 行政配置与市场配置: 基于城乡统筹背景之下的宅基地使用权制度研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2014, 28(6):10-15.
YAO R Q, ZHU M F. Administrative allocation and market allocation: the research of the homestead use right system in the integrated urban and rural development[J].China Land Science, 2014, 28(6):10-15.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] 朱明芬. 农村宅基地产权权能拓展与规范研究: 基于浙江义乌宅基地 “三权分置” 的改革实践[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(11):1972-1980.
ZHU M F. Research on rural housing land property right power development and specification: based on reform practice of rural housing land ‘three rights separations’ in Yiwu, Zhejiang[J].Acta Agriculture Zhejiangensis, 2018, 30(11):1972-1980.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[20] 曾旭晖, 郭晓鸣. 传统农区宅基地“三权分置”路径研究: 基于江西省余江区和四川省泸县宅基地制度改革案例[J]. 农业经济问题, 2019 (6): 58-66.
ZENG X H, GUO X M. The path of “Separation of Three Rights” on rural homestead in traditional rural areas: on the homestead system reform in Yujiang District and Luxian County[J].Problems of Agricultural Economy, 2019 (6): 58-66. (in Chinese with English abstract)

Rural residential land reform and promotion of farmers' income: based on panel data of 6 pilot counties (cities, districts) with difference-in-difference analysis

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 2

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	FU Lisha, QIN Tao, PAN Huanxue, DENG Jing. Empirical analysis on scale effect of forest output of forest insurance premium subsidy policy in China: based on difference-in-differences model and event study model [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(2): 355-368.
[2]	LI Xiaogang, XIONG Tao. Breeding efficiency measurement and subsidy policy benefit evaluation of scale hog in China [J]. , 2019, 31(7): 1184-1192.