Comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality and nutrition of six kumquat varieties

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.03.14

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 534-547.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.03.14

• Horticultural Science • Previous Articles Next Articles

Comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality and nutrition of six kumquat varieties

YANG Lei¹(), HONG Lin¹^,^*(), LIU Zhaojun², YANG Haijian¹, WANG Wu¹

1. Fruit Research Institute, Chongqing Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chongqing 401329, China
2. Liangping District Agricultural Product Brand Development Center, Chongqing 405200, China

Received:2021-07-21 Online:2022-03-25 Published:2022-03-30
Contact: HONG Lin

Abstract

Abstract:

To study the difference of fruit quality and nutrition of different kumquat varieties, 15 main quality indexes, 20 functional component indexes and 17 amino acid nutrition indexes of six kumquat varieties from National Fruit Germplasm (Chongqing) Citrus Nursery were determined as the research object, and comprehensive evaluation was made by combining principal component analysis and membership function method. The results showed that fruit essential quality of Fortunella obovata(Wenguangju) was much better, total flavonoids content of Fortunella classifolia(Huapi) was the highest, Fortunella obovata(Wenguangju) and Fortunella classifolia(Huapi) had high total phenolic acids content. both of Fortunella japonica(Luowen) and Fortunella classifolia(Rong’an) had higher total amino acid content. Efficacy, bitter and aromatic amino acid content of Fortunella classifolia(Huapi)was the highest, and sweet amino acid content of Fortunella classifolia(Rong’an) was the highest. Four principal components were extracted through the principal component analysis (PCA), and the contribution rate reached to 98.905%, then the membership function method was used to obtain comprehensive evaluation values of fruit quality and nutrition of six kumquat varieties, the final score ranking was: Fortunella obovata (Wenguangju)> Fortunella japonica(Ningbo)> Fortunella classifolia(Huapi)> Fortunella crassifolia(Wenzhou)> Fortunella margarita(Ningbo)> Fortunella classifolia(Rong’an). Above all, Fortunella obovata (Wenguangju) and Fortunella japonica(Ningbo) had high comprehensive quality and nutritional value. The result could provide new varieties choice for citrus industry development in Chongqing.

Key words: kumquat, quality, nutrition, principal component analysis, membership function method, comprehensive evaluation

CLC Number:

S666.1

YANG Lei, HONG Lin, LIU Zhaojun, YANG Haijian, WANG Wu. Comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality and nutrition of six kumquat varieties[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(3): 534-547.

Figures/Tables 10

References 47

[1]	黄桂香, 郭丽英, 张树伟, 等. 中越金柑种质资源的ISSR分析[J]. 果树学报, 2011, 28(4): 563-567.
	HUANG G X, GUO L Y, ZHANG S W, et al. Genetic relationship analysis of Fortunella germplasm resources from China and Vietnam by ISSR markers[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2011, 28(4): 563-567. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	BARRECA D, BELLOCCO E, CARISTI C, et al. Kumquat (Fortunella japonica Swingle) juice: flavonoid distribution and antioxidant properties[J]. Food Research International, 2011, 44(7): 2190-2197. DOI URL
[3]	OZCAN-SINIR G, OZKAN-KARABACAK A, TAMER C E, et al. The effect of hot air, vacuum and microwave drying on drying characteristics, rehydration capacity, color, total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of Kumquat (Citrus japonica)[J]. Food Science and Technology, 2019, 39(2): 475-484.
[4]	马张正, 马巧利, 辜青青, 等. 滑皮金柑和融安金柑外观、风味及营养成分比较[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(4): 654-660.
	MA Z Z, MA Q L, GU Q Q, et al. Comparative study of fruit appearance, flavor and nutritional components in Huapi and Rong’an kumquat[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2019, 31(4): 654-660. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	郑洁. 我国不同品种金柑主要营养及功能成分研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2015.
	ZHENG J. Nutritional and functional compounds of major varieties of kumquat (Fortunella Swing) in China[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2015. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	范七君, 陈传武, 邓崇岭, 等. 树冠覆膜对金柑光合作用及果实品质的影响[J]. 广西植物, 2020, 40(7): 1046-1053.
	FAN Q J, CHEN C W, DENG C L, et al. Influences of canopy film-covering on photosynthesis and fruits qualities in kumquat[J]. Guihaia, 2020, 40(7): 1046-1053. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	XIA L L, XU C M, HUANG K L, et al. Evaluation of phenolic compounds, antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of 31 grape cultivars with different genotypes[J]. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 2019, 43(6): e12626. DOI URL
[8]	陈楚英, 刘善军, 付永琦, 等. 基于PCA分析‘南丰’和‘新余’蜜橘的耐贮性差异[J]. 热带作物学报, 2019, 40(12): 2474-2480.
	CHEN C Y, LIU S J, FU Y Q, et al. Application of principle component analysis of fruit storability between harvested ‘Nanfeng’ and ‘Xinyu’ tangerines[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(12): 2474-2480. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	田艳花, 张立伟, 田叶, 等. 11种红枣氨基酸组成及主成分分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2018, 16(4): 1300-1306.
	TIAN Y H, ZHANG L W, TIAN Y, et al. Amino acid composition and principal component analysis of 11 kinds of jujube[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2018, 16(4): 1300-1306. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	李俊芳, 马永昆, 张荣, 等. 不同果桑品种成熟桑椹的游离氨基酸主成分分析和综合评价[J]. 食品科学, 2016, 37(14): 132-137.
	LI J F, MA Y K, ZHANG R, et al. Principal components analysis and comprehensive evaluation of free amino acids in ripe fruits of different mulberry varieties[J]. Food Science, 2016, 37(14): 132-137. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
[11]	牟红梅, 于强, 李庆余, 等. 基于主成分分析的烟台地区西洋梨果实品质综合评价[J]. 果树学报, 2019, 36(8): 1084-1092.
	MU H M, YU Q, LI Q Y, et al. Synthetic evaluation of fruit quality of common pears (Pyrus communis L.) based on principal component analysis in Yantai areas[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2019, 36(8): 1084-1092. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	焦扬, 折发文, 张娟娟, 等. 基于主成分与聚类分析的甘肃地区产地木耳品质综合评价[J]. 食品科学, 2019, 40(8): 130-135.
	JIAO Y, ZHE F W, ZHANG J J, et al. Comprehensive quality evaluation of Nostoc commune Vauch. from Gansu Province by principal component analysis and cluster analysis[J]. Food Science, 2019, 40(8): 130-135. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	SUN L P, LIU Q M, BAO C J, et al. Comparison of free total amino acid compositions and their functional classifications in 13 wild edible mushrooms[J]. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2017, 22(3): 350. DOI URL
[14]	DONG M, QIN L, XUE J, et al. Simultaneous quantification of free amino acids and 5'-nucleotides in shiitake mushrooms by stable isotope labeling-LC-MS/MS analysis[J]. Food Chemistry, 2018, 268: 57-65. DOI URL
[15]	王楠琪, 姜卫兵, 甘可欣, 等. 基于灰色关联度分析和模糊综合评判法的李植株形态学评价[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(12): 172-177.
	WANG N Q, JIANG W B, GAN K X, et al. Morphological evaluation of plum plants based on grey relational analysis and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(12): 172-177. (in Chinese)
[16]	韩蓓蓓, 李东, 许伟峰, 等. 陕西省‘冬枣’气候优生区区划研究[J]. 果树学报, 2020, 37(7): 1008-1015.
	HAN B B, LI D, XU W F, et al. Study on the regionalization of optimum areas for ‘Dongzao’ growing in Shaanxi Province[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2020, 37(7): 1008-1015. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	XI W P, FANG B, ZHAO Q Y, et al. Flavonoid composition and antioxidant activities of Chinese local pummelo (Citrus grandis Osbeck.) varieties[J]. Food Chemistry, 2014, 161: 230-238. DOI URL
[18]	李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.
[19]	何莎莎, 周志钦. 不同种类柑橘果实氨基酸组成及营养品质评价[J]. 中国南方果树, 2018, 47(3): 18-22, 29.
	HE S S, ZHOU Z Q. Evaluation of amino acid composition and nutritional quality in different species of citrus fruit[J]. South China Fruits, 2018, 47(3): 18-22, 29. (in Chinese)
[20]	张桂伟, 张秋云, 江东, 等. 中国主栽葡萄柚果肉酚类物质组成及其抗氧化活性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(9): 1785-1794.
	ZHANG G W, ZHANG Q Y, JIANG D, et al. Phenolic composition and antioxidant activities of grapefruit varieties cultivated in China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(9): 1785-1794. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	LIU Q, TANG G Y, ZHAO C N, et al. Antioxidant activities, phenolic profiles, and organic acid contents of fruit vinegars[J]. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2019, 8(4): 78. DOI URL
[22]	BUKSA K. Effect of pentoses, hexoses, and hydrolyzed arabinoxylan on the most abundant sugar, organic acid, and alcohol contents during rye sourdough bread production[J]. Cereal Chemistry, 2020, 97(3): 642-652. DOI URL
[23]	高兴, 唐志鹏, 秦荣耀, 等. 脆蜜金柑、融安金柑及滑皮金柑果实品质对比分析[J]. 南方农业学报, 2016, 47(4): 604-607.
	GAO X, TANG Z P, QIN R Y, et al. Analysis on fruit quality of kumquat Cuimi, Rong’an and Huapi[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2016, 47(4): 604-607. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	徐静, 谭李梅, 符红艳, 等. 利用分子标记对14份枸橼种质进行多样性分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(14): 4726-4737.
	XU J, TAN L M, FU H Y, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of 14 citron genotypes based on molecular markers[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2021, 19(14): 4726-4737. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	韦壮敏, 李蒙蒙, 杨晓明, 等. 无核酸橙资源‘抛橘’的遗传鉴定[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(2): 345-354.
	WEI Z M, LI M M, YANG X M, et al. Genetic background analysis of seedless sour orange ‘Paoju’[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2020, 47(2): 345-354. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	陈源, 黄贤贵, 余亚白, 等. 金柑果实功能成分研究进展[J]. 中国南方果树, 2014, 43(1): 28-31.
	CHEN Y, HUANG X G, YU Y B, et al. Research progress on functional components of kumquat fruit[J]. South China Fruits, 2014, 43(1): 28-31. (in Chinese)
[27]	李勋兰, 洪林, 杨蕾, 等. 11个柑橘品种果实营养成分分析与品质综合评价[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(8): 228-233.
	LI X L, HONG L, YANG L, et al. Analysis of nutritional components and comprehensive quality evaluation of citrus fruit from eleven varieties[J]. Food Science, 2020, 41(8): 228-233. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	ZHAO Z Y, HE S S, HU Y, et al. Fruit flavonoid variation between and within four cultivated citrus species evaluated by UPLC-PDA system[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2017, 224: 93-101. DOI URL
[29]	鲁敏, 安华明, 赵小红. 无籽刺梨与刺梨果实中氨基酸分析[J]. 食品科学, 2015, 36(14): 118-121.
	LU M, AN H M, ZHAO X H. Analysis of amino acids in Rosa sterilis and Rosa roxburghii fruits[J]. Food Science, 2015, 36(14): 118-121. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	孙娟娟, 阿拉木斯, 赵金梅, 等. 6个紫花苜蓿品种氨基酸组成分析及营养价值评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(13): 2359-2367.
	SUN J J, A L M S, ZHAO J M, et al. Analysis of amino acid composition and six native alfalfa cultivars[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(13): 2359-2367. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	刘伟, 张群, 李志坚, 等. 不同品种黄花菜游离氨基酸组成的主成分分析及聚类分析[J]. 食品科学, 2019, 40(10): 243-250.
	LIU W, ZHANG Q, LI Z J, et al. Principal component analysis and cluster analysis for evaluating free amino acids of different cultivars of daylily buds[J]. Food Science, 2019, 40(10): 243-250. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	唐宁, 杨阳, 黄涛江, 等. 重庆6个晚熟柑橘品种果实氨基酸含量及组成分析[J]. 中国南方果树, 2013, 42(5): 50-52.
	TANG N, YANG Y, HUANG T J, et al. Analysis of amino acid content and composition in fruits of six late-maturing citrus varieties in Chongqing[J]. South China Fruits, 2013, 42(5): 50-52. (in Chinese)
[33]	MATSUO Y, MIURA L A, ARAKI T, et al. Proximate composition and profiles of free amino acids, fatty acids, minerals and aroma compounds in citrus natsudaidai peel[J]. Food Chemistry, 2019, 279: 356-363. DOI URL
[34]	AHAMMED G J, LI X, WAN H J, et al. SlWRKY81 reduces drought tolerance by attenuating proline biosynthesis in tomato[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2020, 270: 109444. DOI URL
[35]	KHARE T, SRIVASTAVA A K, SUPRASANNA P, et al. Individual and additive stress impacts of Na⁺ and Cl^- on proline metabolism and nitrosative responses in rice[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2020, 152: 44-52. DOI URL
[36]	普布卓玛, 其美拉姆, 李丹丹, 等. 外源脯氨酸对低温胁迫下西藏野生垂穗披碱草幼苗生长和抗氧化酶相关基因表达的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(3): 589-596.
	PUBU Z M, QIMEI L M, LI D D, et al. Effects of exogenous proline on growth and antioxidant enzyme related gene expression of Elymus nutans under low temperature stress[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(3): 589-596. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37]	安锋, 李昌珍, 张婷婷, 等. 铝胁迫对橡胶苗生理和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(12): 4191-4198.
	AN F, LI C Z, ZHANG T T, et al. Effects of aluminum toxicity on physiological and leaf chlorophyll fluorescent characteristics of rubber tree seedlings[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(12): 4191-4198. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[38]	RADY M M, ELRYS A S, ABO EL-MAATI M F, et al. Interplaying roles of silicon and proline effectively improve salt and cadmium stress tolerance in Phaseolus vulgaris plant[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2019, 139: 558-568. DOI URL
[39]	GONG X Q, ZHANG J Y, HU J B, et al. FcWRKY70, a WRKY protein of Fortunella crassifolia, functions in drought tolerance and modulates putrescine synthesis by regulating arginine decarboxylase gene[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2015, 38(11): 2248-2262.
[40]	DAI W S, WANG M, GONG X Q, et al. The transcription factor FcWRKY40 of Fortunella crassifolia functions positively in salt tolerance through modulation of ion homeostasis and proline biosynthesis by directly regulating SOS2 and P5CS1 homologs[J]. The New Phytologist, 2018, 219(3): 972-989. DOI URL
[41]	欧智涛, 杜明富, 黄桂香, 等. 5份金柑种质实生苗的抗旱性评价[J]. 中国南方果树, 2014, 43(3): 68-70.
	OU Z T, DU M F, HUANG G X, et al. Evaluation of drought resistance of five citrus germplasm seedlings[J]. South China Fruits, 2014, 43(3): 68-70. (in Chinese)
[42]	刘兆金, 印遇龙, 邓敦, 等. 精氨酸生理营养研究[J]. 氨基酸和生物资源, 2005, 27(4): 54-57.
	LIU Z J, YIN Y L, DENG D, et al. Research on nutrition and physiology of arginine[J]. Amino Acids & Biotic Resources, 2005, 27(4): 54-57. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[43]	代欢欢, 山雨思, 辛正琦, 等. 外源甜菜碱对盐胁迫下颠茄生理特性及托品烷类生物碱含量的影响[J]. 植物科学学报, 2020, 38(3): 400-409.
	DAI H H, SHAN Y S, XIN Z Q, et al. Effects of exogenous betaine on physiological characteristics and tropidine alkaloid content in Atropa belladonna L. under NaCl stress[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2020, 38(3): 400-409. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[44]	王建, 于世欣, 王逸筠, 等. 外源NO对铜胁迫下番茄植物螯合肽及精氨酸代谢的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2014, 28(4): 317-323.
	WANG J, YU S X, WANG Y J, et al. Effect of exogenous NO on phytochelatins and arginine metabolism in tomato under copper stress[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014, 28(4): 317-323. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[45]	郭家刚, 杨松, 伍玉菡, 等. 基于主成分与聚类分析的蓝莓品质综合评价研究[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2020, 41(12): 53-60.
	GUO J G, YANG S, WU Y H, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of blueberry quality based on principal component and cluster analysis[J]. Food Research and Development, 2020, 41(12): 53-60. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[46]	匡立学, 聂继云, 李银萍, 等. 中国不同地区‘富士’苹果品质评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(11): 2253-2263.
	KUANG L X, NIE J Y, LI Y P, et al. Quality evaluation of ‘Fuji’ apples cultivated in different regions of China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(11): 2253-2263. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[47]	高春华, 朱金英, 张华文, 等. 38个粒用高粱品种芽期耐盐性的综合鉴定及评价[J]. 核农学报, 2019, 33(9): 1841-1855.
	GAO C H, ZHU J Y, ZHANG H W, et al. Comprehensive identification and evaluation of 38 grain Sorghum cultivars for tolerance during germination[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 33(9): 1841-1855. (in Chinese with English abstract)

品种 Variety	SFW/g	VD/cm	TD/cm	FSI	SN	ER/%	TSS/%	TA/ (g·L^-1)
温光橘 Fortunella obovata	24.56 ±2.47 A	3.53 ±0.25 a	3.56 ±0.32 a	0.99 ±0.07 a	4.90 ±0.61 A	98.70 ±0.89 a	14.10 ±0.20 A	9.200 ±0.009 B
滑皮金柑 Fortunella classifolia (Huapi)	19.11 ±2.33 B	3.30 ±0.17 a	3.27 ±0.19 a	1.01 ±0.12 a	2.10 ±0.41 C	96.30 ±0.77 b	13.03 ±0.11 B	7.600 ±0.008 BC
宁波罗浮 Fortunella margarita	12.07 ±0.87 C	2.91 ±0.33 b	2.78 ±0.22 a	1.05 ±0.08 a	3.50 ±0.28 B	95.90 ±1.52 b	13.00 ±0.15 B	7.800 ±0.009 BC
宁波罗纹 Fortunella japonica	18.18 ±1.02 B	3.24 ±0.19 a	3.25 ±0.28 a	1.00 ±0.05 a	3.70 ±0.44 B	96.90 ±1.02 ab	13.06 ±0.20 B	11.600 ±0.013 A
融安金柑 Fortunella classifolia (Rong’an)	16.23 ±1.31 B	3.11 ±0.21 ab	3.10 ±0.30 a	1.00 ±0.03 a	5.30 ±0.52 A	95.60 ±1.09 b	12.03 ±0.09 C	8.200 ±0.007 BC
温州金弹 Fortunella crassifolia (Wenzhou)	19.61 ±2.54 B	3.32 ±0.31 a	3.25 ±0.27 a	1.02 ±0.09 a	4.90 ±0.33 A	96.20 ±0.88 b	12.11 ±0.14 C	7.000 ±0.006 C
品种 Variety	V_C	葡萄糖 Glucose/ (g·L^-1)	果糖 Fructose/ (g·L^-1)	蔗糖 Sucrose/ (g·L^-1)	TS/ (g·L^-1)	SAR	SR
温光橘 Fortunella obovata	0.505 8 ±0.081 0 A	12.7 ±1.5 DE	36.0 ±6.8 A	131.0 ±15.3 A	179.6 ±18.7 A	15.22 ±1.69 AB	19.52 ±3.11 A
滑皮金柑 Fortunella classifolia (Huapi)	0.236 5 ±0.032 6 B	21.6 ±2.7 BC	30.1 ±4.1 A	59.0 ±6.6 CD	110.6 ±11.1 B	17.08 ±3.12 A	14.53 ±1.68 C
宁波罗浮 Fortunella margarita	0.295 6 ±0.043 2 B	23.2 ±3.8 AB	30.2 ±4.4 A	73.7 ±8.2 BC	127.2 ±14.1 B	16.76 ±2.15 AB	16.39 ±1.93 B
宁波罗纹 Fortunella japonica	0.279 2 ±0.036 8 B	17.3 ±1.9 CD	32.0 ±5.9 A	84.8 ±9.6 B	134.1 ±16.4 B	11.21 ±1.10 C	11.56 ±1.36 D
融安金柑 Fortunella classifolia (Rong’an)	0.272 6 ±0.039 7 B	10.3 ±1.1 E	16.5 ±3.1 B	55.6 ±3.9 D	107.3 ±12.0 BC	14.63 ±1.97 AB	13.09 ±2.32 C
温州金弹 Fortunella crassifolia (Wenzhou)	0.262 8 ±0.035 4 B	27.1 ±3.5 A	35.5 ±5.9 A	62.7 ±7.1 CD	125.3 ±14.4 B	17.08 ±2.98 A	17.83 ±3.52 B

品种 Variety	SFW/g	VD/cm	TD/cm	FSI	SN	ER/%	TSS/%	TA/ (g·L^-1)
温光橘 Fortunella obovata	24.56 ±2.47 A	3.53 ±0.25 a	3.56 ±0.32 a	0.99 ±0.07 a	4.90 ±0.61 A	98.70 ±0.89 a	14.10 ±0.20 A	9.200 ±0.009 B
滑皮金柑 Fortunella classifolia (Huapi)	19.11 ±2.33 B	3.30 ±0.17 a	3.27 ±0.19 a	1.01 ±0.12 a	2.10 ±0.41 C	96.30 ±0.77 b	13.03 ±0.11 B	7.600 ±0.008 BC
宁波罗浮 Fortunella margarita	12.07 ±0.87 C	2.91 ±0.33 b	2.78 ±0.22 a	1.05 ±0.08 a	3.50 ±0.28 B	95.90 ±1.52 b	13.00 ±0.15 B	7.800 ±0.009 BC
宁波罗纹 Fortunella japonica	18.18 ±1.02 B	3.24 ±0.19 a	3.25 ±0.28 a	1.00 ±0.05 a	3.70 ±0.44 B	96.90 ±1.02 ab	13.06 ±0.20 B	11.600 ±0.013 A
融安金柑 Fortunella classifolia (Rong’an)	16.23 ±1.31 B	3.11 ±0.21 ab	3.10 ±0.30 a	1.00 ±0.03 a	5.30 ±0.52 A	95.60 ±1.09 b	12.03 ±0.09 C	8.200 ±0.007 BC
温州金弹 Fortunella crassifolia (Wenzhou)	19.61 ±2.54 B	3.32 ±0.31 a	3.25 ±0.27 a	1.02 ±0.09 a	4.90 ±0.33 A	96.20 ±0.88 b	12.11 ±0.14 C	7.000 ±0.006 C
品种 Variety	V_C	葡萄糖 Glucose/ (g·L^-1)	果糖 Fructose/ (g·L^-1)	蔗糖 Sucrose/ (g·L^-1)	TS/ (g·L^-1)	SAR	SR
温光橘 Fortunella obovata	0.505 8 ±0.081 0 A	12.7 ±1.5 DE	36.0 ±6.8 A	131.0 ±15.3 A	179.6 ±18.7 A	15.22 ±1.69 AB	19.52 ±3.11 A
滑皮金柑 Fortunella classifolia (Huapi)	0.236 5 ±0.032 6 B	21.6 ±2.7 BC	30.1 ±4.1 A	59.0 ±6.6 CD	110.6 ±11.1 B	17.08 ±3.12 A	14.53 ±1.68 C
宁波罗浮 Fortunella margarita	0.295 6 ±0.043 2 B	23.2 ±3.8 AB	30.2 ±4.4 A	73.7 ±8.2 BC	127.2 ±14.1 B	16.76 ±2.15 AB	16.39 ±1.93 B
宁波罗纹 Fortunella japonica	0.279 2 ±0.036 8 B	17.3 ±1.9 CD	32.0 ±5.9 A	84.8 ±9.6 B	134.1 ±16.4 B	11.21 ±1.10 C	11.56 ±1.36 D
融安金柑 Fortunella classifolia (Rong’an)	0.272 6 ±0.039 7 B	10.3 ±1.1 E	16.5 ±3.1 B	55.6 ±3.9 D	107.3 ±12.0 BC	14.63 ±1.97 AB	13.09 ±2.32 C
温州金弹 Fortunella crassifolia (Wenzhou)	0.262 8 ±0.035 4 B	27.1 ±3.5 A	35.5 ±5.9 A	62.7 ±7.1 CD	125.3 ±14.4 B	17.08 ±2.98 A	17.83 ±3.52 B

品种 Variety	芸香柚皮苷 Narirutin	野漆树苷 Rhoifolin	新橙皮苷 Neohesperidin	香蜂草苷 Didymin	枸橘苷 Poncirin	TF
温光橘Fortunella obovata	1.55±0.28 e	5.09±0.63 C	0.09±0.03 D	9.67±0.82 D	1.33±0.30 a	17.74±2.0 C
滑皮金柑	3.45±0.88 a	9.00±0.87 A	1.44±0.19 A	38.31±3.69 A	1.13±0.21 a	53.32±5.84 A
Fortunella classifolia(Huapi)
宁波罗浮Fortunella margarita	2.49±0.36 abc	6.94±0.79 B	1.11±0.13 B	27.67±2.06 B	1.33±0.29 a	39.55±3.63 B
宁波罗纹Fortunella japonica	3.07±0.64 ab	2.59±0.28 D	0.93±0.10 BC	15.50±2.09 C	0.94±0.09 a	23.03±3.20 C
融安金柑	2.37±0.39 bc	2.35±0.25 D	1.15±0.17 B	11.36±1.03 D	1.24±0.17 a	18.47±2.01 C
Fortunella classifolia(Rong’an)
温州金弹	2.47±0.41 abc	5.60±0.60 C	0.77±0.08 C	25.57±2.81 B	1.47±0.22 a	35.87±4.12 B
Fortunella crassifolia (Wenzhou)

品种 Variety	芸香柚皮苷 Narirutin	野漆树苷 Rhoifolin	新橙皮苷 Neohesperidin	香蜂草苷 Didymin	枸橘苷 Poncirin	TF
温光橘Fortunella obovata	1.55±0.28 e	5.09±0.63 C	0.09±0.03 D	9.67±0.82 D	1.33±0.30 a	17.74±2.0 C
滑皮金柑	3.45±0.88 a	9.00±0.87 A	1.44±0.19 A	38.31±3.69 A	1.13±0.21 a	53.32±5.84 A
Fortunella classifolia(Huapi)
宁波罗浮Fortunella margarita	2.49±0.36 abc	6.94±0.79 B	1.11±0.13 B	27.67±2.06 B	1.33±0.29 a	39.55±3.63 B
宁波罗纹Fortunella japonica	3.07±0.64 ab	2.59±0.28 D	0.93±0.10 BC	15.50±2.09 C	0.94±0.09 a	23.03±3.20 C
融安金柑	2.37±0.39 bc	2.35±0.25 D	1.15±0.17 B	11.36±1.03 D	1.24±0.17 a	18.47±2.01 C
Fortunella classifolia(Rong’an)
温州金弹	2.47±0.41 abc	5.60±0.60 C	0.77±0.08 C	25.57±2.81 B	1.47±0.22 a	35.87±4.12 B
Fortunella crassifolia (Wenzhou)

品种 Variety	苯甲酸型 Benzoic acid			肉桂酸型 Cinnamic acid				TPA
品种 Variety	香草酸 Vanillic acid	原儿茶酸 Protocatechuic acid	对羟基苯甲酸 p-hydroxybenzonic acid	对香豆酸 p-Coumaric acid	咖啡酸 Caffeic acid	芥子酸 Sinapic acid	阿魏酸 Ferulic acid	TPA
温光橘 Fortunella obovata	3.74 ±0.27 A	12.32 ±0.79A	11.14 ±0.49 B	0.43 ±0.05A	1.86 ±0.24 a	0.65 ±0.07 C	0.71 ±0.09 B	30.86 ±2.47 A
滑皮金柑Fortunella classifolia (Huapi)	3.88 ±0.47 A	5.48 ±0.39 B	11.98 ±0.56 A	0.39 ±0.04AB	1.70 ±0.22 a	3.73 ±0.50 A	1.03 ±0.06 A	28.19 ±2.38 A
宁波罗浮 Fortunella margarita	3.39 ±0.33 A	4.23 ±0.37 C	10.94 ±0.67 B	0.30 ±0.01D	2.00 ±0.27 a	1.86 ±0.22 B	0.75 ±0.07 B	23.47 ±1.93 B
宁波罗纹 Fortunella japonica	2.25 ±0.22 B	2.79 ±0.11D	8.73 ±0.29 D	0.39 ±0.02AB	1.90 ±0.20 a	0.49 ±0.07 C	0.72 ±0.06 B	17.26 ±1.58 C
融安金柑Fortunella classifolia (Rong’an)	2.58 ±0.30 B	2.80 ±0.18D	7.91 ±0.41 E	0.33 ±0.02CD	1.74 ±0.15 a	0.38 ±0.04 C	0.81 ±0.10 B	16.54 ±1.19 C
温州金弹Fortunella crassifolia(Wenzhou)	3.81 ±0.56 A	3.81 ±0.22 C	10.08 ±0.59 C	0.36 ±0.02BC	1.91 ±0.19 a	1.99 ±0.28 B	1.14 ±0.09 A	23.11 ±1.88 B

Comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality and nutrition of six kumquat varieties

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 47

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

品种Variety	Asp	Glu	Ser	Gly	His	Arg
温光橘Fortunella obovata	67.4±5.2 A	107.9±1.0 A	188.1±20.0 D	25.0±6.1A	16.2±1.6C	731.7±40.1 D
滑皮金柑	51.1±4.4 B	65.7±9.2 B	240.4±.6.0 BC	19.0±3.0 ABC	18.0±3.0 BC	1 415.1±45.6 A
Fortunella classifolia(Huapi)
宁波罗浮Fortunella margarita	37.5±3.2 C	55.7±8.6 B	187.2±17.5 D	12.4±1.3 C	15.4±1.1 C	1 077.1±47.1 B
宁波罗纹Fortunella japonica	52.5±6.2 B	110.8±9.1 A	260.7±31.2 B	16.0±3.5 BC	23.5±3.3 AB	694.1±36.7 D
融安金柑	53.4±5.2 B	112.7±16.8 A	323.0±28.6 A	20.2±4.3 AB	26.4±5.3 A	838.3±39.9 C
Fortunella classifolia(Rong’an)
温州金弹	38.0±4.2 C	56.2±7.7 B	215.5±18.8 CD	14.8±2.1 BC	21.3±3.7 ABC	1 383.8±39.1 A
Fortunella crassifolia (Wenzhou)
品种Variety	Thr	Ala	Pro	Tyr	Val	Met
温光橘Fortunella obovata	25.1±1.6 E	169.8±27.6A	3260.3±218.6B	8.4±0.8 B	9.9±0.9 B	3.9±0.4 C
滑皮金柑	47.0±6.1 BC	81.0±9.6 C	2281.6±198.9D	13.3±1.1 A	11.5±0.9 A	7.9±0.7 A
Fortunella classifolia(Huapi)
宁波罗浮Fortunella margarita	35.4±4.0 D	131.6±22.2B	1791.2±104.4E	9.3±1.1 B	8.5±0.6 C	5.4±0.5 B
宁波罗纹Fortunella japonica	50.5±6.9 AB	119.2±12.8B	3768.0±102.5A	4.9±0.5 C	7.2±0.7 C	1.4±0.2 E
安金柑	57.7±7.3 A	126.5±19.1B	3391.3±178.5B	5.6±0.7 C	8.4±0.6 C	1.5±0.3 E
Fortunella classifolia (Rong’an)
温州金弹	37.7±5.7 CD	134.5±19.6B	2944.9±107.9C	8.4±0.9 B	8.4±0.5 C	3.1±0.3 D
Fortunella crassifolia(Wenzhou)
品种Variety	Cys	Ile	Leu	Phe	Lys	TAA
温光橘Fortunella obovata	2.9±0.3 C	6.3±0.6 CD	10.8±1.8 BCD	21.0±2.9 a	6.0±0.7 C	4 660.3±378.8 AB
滑皮金柑	4.9±0.4 B	8.6±0.9 A	22.3±3.3 A	21.4±3.7 a	24.5±2.8 A	4 333.3±362.8 B
Fortunella classifolia (Huapi)
宁波罗浮Fortunella margarita	3.3±0.5 C	7.4±0.6 BC	13.1±2.2 BC	18.8±1.0 a	16.6±1.3 B	3 425.8±299.8 C
宁波罗纹Fortunella japonica	7.1±0.9 A	5.9±0.4 D	7.8±0.6 D	18.9±1.0 a	3.3±0.4 C	5 151.5±476.2 A
融安金柑	4.9±0.6 B	7.5±0.7 AB	8.9±0.9 CD	19.5±1.9 a	5.7±0.6 C	5 011.3±395.5 A
Fortunella classifolia(Rong’an)
温州金弹	4.8±0.4 B	7.7±0.6 AB	14.2±3.9 B	20.2±2.2 a	17.0±2.1 B	4 930.4±400.1 A
Fortunella crassifolia(Wenzhou)

品种 Variety	EAA/ (g·kg^-1)	NAA/ ( g·kg^-1)	CE/ ( g·kg^-1)	EAA/TAA /%	EAA/NAA /%	CE/TAA /%
温光橘Fortunella obovata	0.082 9	4.577 4	0.747 8	1.78	1.81	16.05
滑皮金柑Fortunella classifolia(Huapi)	0.143 2	4.190 1	1.433 1	3.31	3.42	33.07
宁波罗浮Fortunella margarita	0.105 1	3.320 7	1.092 5	3.07	3.17	31.89
宁波罗纹Fortunella japonica	0.094 8	5.056 7	0.717 6	1.84	1.87	13.93
融安金柑Fortunella classifolia(Rong’an)	0.109 2	4.902 2	0.864 7	2.18	2.23	17.25
温州金弹Fortunella crassifolia(Wenzhou)	0.108 2	4.822 1	1.405 1	2.20	2.24	28.50

品种 Variety	甜味氨基酸 Sweet amino acid	药效氨基酸 Pharmacodynamic amino acid	苦味氨基酸 Bitter amino acid	酸鲜味氨基酸 Sour umami amino acid	芳香氨基酸 Aromatic amino acid
温光橘Fortunella obovata	3.674 3	0.979 7	0.799 6	0.175 2	0.029 3
滑皮金柑Fortunella classifolia (Huapi)	2.693 5	1.635 6	1.504 8	0.116 8	0.034 7
宁波罗浮Fortunella margarita	2.174 4	1.243 9	1.145 6	0.093 2	0.028 1
宁波罗纹Fortunella japonica	4.217 6	0.910 6	0.758 7	0.163 3	0.023 8
融安金柑Fortunella classifolia (Rong’an)	3.924 3	1.067 6	0.910 4	0.166 1	0.025 1
温州金弹Fortunella crassifolia (Wenzhou)	3.364 4	1.555 0	1.458 6	0.094 2	0.028 6

指标	SFW	SN	ER	TSS	TA	TS	SAR	V_C	SR	TAA	SAAR	BAAR	TF
Index
SN	-0.232
ER	0.817^*	-0.158
TSS	0.453	0.272	0.832^*
TA	-0.185	-0.001	-0.439	-0.412
TS	0.658	-0.304	0.946^**	0.792	-0.373
SAR	-0.085	0.164	-0.237	-0.136	-0.951^**	-0.178
V_C	0.629	-0.408	0.891^*	0.753	-0.246	0.945^**	-0.090
SR	0.445	-0.288	0.504	0.363	0.482	0.625	0.624	0.643
TAA	0.533	-0.475	0.183	-0.290	-0.417	0.035	-0.572	0.001	-0.308
SAAR	0.390	-0.6	0.448	0.138	-0.759	0.419	-0.843	0.432	-0.261	0.726
BAAR	-0.394	0.582	-0.468	-0.177	0.765	-0.436	0.840	-0.458	0.255	-0.700	-0.998
TF	-0.295	0.806	-0.413	-0.101	0.547	-0.485	0.645	-0.561	0.025	-0.550	-0.927	0.928
TPA	0.550	0.282	0.605	0.672	0.330	0.550	0.576	0.556	0.767	-0.396	-0.405	0.379	0.352

指标 Index	特征向量 Eigenvector				主成分荷载系数 Principal component loading coefficient
指标 Index	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4
SFW	0.647	0.444	-0.128	0.605	0.102	0.096	-0.069	0.602
SN	-0.531	0.182	0.798	0.218	-0.083	0.039	0.429	0.217
ER	0.789	0.578	0.165	0.119	0.124	0.125	0.088	0.119
TSS	0.488	0.655	0.551	-0.143	0.077	0.141	0.296	-0.142
TA	-0.709	0.375	-0.578	0.047	-0.112	0.081	-0.311	0.047
TS	0.764	0.600	0.040	-0.153	0.120	0.130	0.022	-0.152
SAR	-0.671	0.620	-0.395	0.034	-0.106	0.134	-0.213	0.034
V_C	0.749	0.603	-0.093	-0.231	0.118	0.130	-0.050	-0.230
SR	0.105	0.863	-0.453	-0.097	0.017	0.186	-0.243	-0.097
TAA	0.565	-0.506	-0.264	0.594	0.089	-0.109	-0.142	0.591
SAAR	0.899	-0.429	-0.054	-0.018	0.142	-0.093	-0.029	-0.018
BAAR	-0.907	0.405	0.029	0.035	-0.143	0.087	0.016	0.035
TF	-0.856	0.303	0.301	0.275	-0.135	0.066	0.162	0.274
TPA	0.014	0.972	0.083	0.193	0.002	0.210	0.045	0.192
特征值	6.355	4.627	1.860	1.004	6.355	4.627	1.860	1.004
Characteristic value
贡献率	45.395	33.049	13.287	7.174	45.395	33.049	13.287	7.174
Contribution rate/%
累计贡献率	45.395	78.444	91.731	98.905	45.395	78.444	91.731	98.905
Accumulative contribution rate/%

品种 Variety	主成分1 PCA1	主成分2 PCA2	主成分3 PCA3	主成分4 PCA4	综合得分 Composite score	综合排名 Composite ranking
温光橘Fortunella obovata	3.71	2.90	-0.25	-0.11	2.63	1
滑皮金柑Fortunella classifolia(Huapi)	-2.61	1.10	1.20	1.20	-0.58	3
宁波罗浮Fortunella margarita	-2.33	0.85	0.50	-1.71	-0.84	5
宁波罗纹Fortunella japonica	2.15	-2.46	1.63	0.18	0.40	2
融安金柑Fortunella classifolia(Rong’an)	0.17	-2.59	-1.29	-0.29	-0.98	6
温州金弹Fortunella crassifolia(Wenzhou)	-1.09	0.19	-1.79	0.72	-0.62	4

品种 Variety	隶属函数值Subordinative function value				综合得分 Composite score	综合排名 Composite ranking
品种 Variety	U₁	U₂	U₃	U₄	综合得分 Composite score	综合排名 Composite ranking
温光橘Fortunella obovata	1.00	1.00	0.45	0.55	0.88	1
滑皮金柑Fortunella classifolia(Huapi)	0	0.67	0.87	1.00	0.41	3
宁波罗浮Fortunella margarita	0.04	0.63	0.67	0	0.32	5
宁波罗纹Fortunella japonica	0.75	0.02	1.00	0.65	0.53	2
融安金柑Fortunella classifolia(Rong’an)	0.44	0	0.15	0.49	0.25	6
温州金弹Fortunella crassifolia(Wenzhou)	0.24	0.51	0	0.84	0.34	4

[1]	SUN Wenyan, LIU Xiaogang, ZHANG Wenhui, LI Huiyong, WU Lang, YANG Qiliang, XIONG Guomei. Optimization of drip fertigation scheme for Coffea arabica based on soil quality index [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(3): 566-573.
[2]	HUANG Hexiao, ZHANG Xihua, ZHUO Ni, LI Baozhi, ZHANG Weijiang, ZHU Qibiao. Research on training behavior of high quality farmers from perspective of social capital demand: based on theory of planned behavior [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(3): 652-660.
[3]	PEI Yun, XU Xiuhong, LU Jinbiao, CHEN Amin, ZHANG Wanping. Genetic diversity analysis of 151 cherry tomato resources in Guizhou Province [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(2): 310-316.
[4]	MO Yanling, ZHANG Wenjing, LUO Yalan, ZENG Jing, CHEN Jingjing, LIU Yihua. Identification and evaluation of agronomic traits and nutritional quality traits in wide handle mustard germplam resources [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(2): 317-328.
[5]	CAI Jiye, FANG Xiangjun, HAN Yanchao, DING Yuting, CHEN Hangjun, WU Weijie, GAO Haiyan. Effect controlled atmosphere storage on postharvest preservation of Dongkui bayberry [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(2): 352-359.
[6]	ZHANG Yingping, TANG Honggang, LI Huanhuan, ZHANG Jin, CHEN Lihong, YANG Yeshuang, WANG Fulong, CHEN Yifan, ZHU Renjun. Effect of colorant and packaging on quality of Chinese sausage during storage [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(2): 360-369.
[7]	ZHANG Na, ZHOU Muchuan, WANG Qinggang, DING Yuxian, CHEN Aiqiang. Effect of hot water treatment on storage quality of Nanfengtangerine and heat transfer analysis [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(2): 370-377.
[8]	OU Xiuqiong, LI Rui, ZHANG Xiaochun, ZHONG Zhengze, LI Xing, JING Shaohong, GUO Zongyi, LI Xinggui. Research progress of effects of muscle fiber type composition on muscle quality and energy metabolism in pigs [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(1): 196-203.
[9]	YANG Chao, LIU Minzhu, LI Qiang, HAN Tao, PENG Liangzhi, LING Lili, FU Xingzheng, CHUN Changpin, CAO Li, HE Yizhong. Effects of different light-emitting diode (LED) light quality on growth, development and photosynthetic characteristics of Jinqiu Shatangju seedlings [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(1): 89-97.
[10]	WU Jiawei, YAO Zhangliang, HU Qiqi, ZHANG Jie, CHEN Yi, JIANG Jianrong, ZHOU Guoxin, WANG Xia. Fungicides and optimum time for control of pear rust in Tongxiang City, north Zhejiang, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(9): 1668-1675.
[11]	JIA Yangyang, NIE Zongning, LUO Xingyu, YANG Kaihui, HE Chunlei. Study on processing technology of exogenous polyphenol oxidase assisted fermentation of Tibetan tea [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(9): 1720-1729.
[12]	GUO Jia, MEN Xiaoming, DENG Bo, XU Ziwei. Advances of function, expression of animal selenoproteins and their regulation mechanism on meat quality [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(9): 1779-1788.
[13]	LI Shunjin, AN Yuli, CUI Yutao, LI Haoran, CHEN Xinping, ZHANG Wei. Optimization potential of phosphorus input in wheat production in China and its effects on yield, grain nutrition and ecological environment [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(8): 1358-1366.
[14]	ZHANG Zhigang, LIU Yufang, LI Changcheng, LI Hong, CHENG Ping, YANG Lu. Effect of different maturity on fruit quality of apricot [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(8): 1402-1408.
[15]	QI Zhenyu, CAI Licong, HU Weizhen, CAI Pan, ZHANG Longping, REN Yanyun, ZHOU Yanhong. Effects of reduced application of chemical fertilizers and ratio of base and topdressing fertilizers on yield and quality of garlic in integrated mode of water and fertilizer [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(8): 1409-1415.