太湖国家湿地公园生态恢复成效评估研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2017.12.21

浙江农业学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (12): 2109-2119.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2017.12.21

太湖国家湿地公园生态恢复成效评估研究

朱颖¹, 林静雅¹, 赵越¹, 冯育青², 张铭连²

1.苏州科技大学建筑与城市规划学院,江苏苏州215011;
2. 苏州湿地保护管理站,江苏苏州215000

收稿日期:2017-09-17 出版日期:2017-12-20 发布日期:2018-01-08
作者简介:朱颖(1973—),女,安徽萧县人,副教授,从事风景园林规划设计理论与实践研究。E-mail:zhuying@mail.usts.edu.cn
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究项目(17YJAZH137); 江苏省住建厅科技项目(2016ZD71); 江苏省高校哲学社会科学基金(2013SJB790052); 苏州科技大学“风景园林学学科建设项目” 江苏省企业研究生工作站资助项目

Study on effectiveness evaluation of ecological restoration of Taihu National Wetland Park

ZHU Ying¹, LIN Jingya¹, ZHAO Yue¹, FENG Yuqing², ZHANG Minglian²

1. School of Architecture and Urban Planning,Suzhou University of Science and Technology,Suzhou 215011,China;
2. Suzhou Wetland Conservation and Management Station,Suzhou 215000,China

Received:2017-09-17 Online:2017-12-20 Published:2018-01-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于生态恢复理论和成效评估逻辑框架,从环境质量、物种多样性、景观格局和社会服务等4个方面选取相应指标,建立一套评估湿地公园生态恢复成效的指标体系,以太湖国家湿地公园为实证,对太湖国家湿地公园的生态恢复成效进行科学评估。结果表明:太湖国家湿地公园生态恢复成效指数从2005年的34.10分升至2015年的73.95分,湿地公园生态系统状况改善较为明显,生态恢复成效较为显著,为保障湿地公园得到良性发展,太湖国家湿地公园在注重生态恢复的同时,采用多学科研究与适度开发的方法,发挥出应有的生态效益和社会效益。

关键词: 湿地公园, 生态恢复, 指标体系, AHP-变异系数法-综合指数法, 综合评估

Abstract: Based on the ecological restoration theory and the effectiveness evaluation framework,this paper chose the corresponding indexes from four aspects: environmental quality,species diversity,landscape pattern and social service,and established an index system to evaluate the ecological restoration effect of wetland park. The park is an empirical assessment of the ecological restoration of Taihu National Wetland Park. The results showed that the ecological restoration performance index of Taihu National Wetland Park increased from 34.10 points in 2005 to 73.95 points in 2015,the improvement of wetland park ecosystem status was more obvious,and the effect of ecological restoration was remarkable. To ensure the healthy development of wetland park,Taihu National Wetland Park paid attention to the ecological restoration; meanwhile, the method of multi-disciplinary research and appropriate development were used to play the ecological benefits and social benefits.

Key words: wetland park, ecological restoration, index system, AHP-variance coefficient method-comprehensive index method, comprehensive assessment

中图分类号:

P901

朱颖, 林静雅, 赵越, 冯育青, 张铭连. 太湖国家湿地公园生态恢复成效评估研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(12): 2109-2119.

ZHU Ying, LIN Jingya, ZHAO Yue, FENG Yuqing, ZHANG Minglian. Study on effectiveness evaluation of ecological restoration of Taihu National Wetland Park[J]. , 2017, 29(12): 2109-2119.

参考文献

[1] 蒋卫国,李京,李加洪,等. 辽河三角洲湿地生态系统健康评价[J]. 生态学报,2005(3):408-414.
JIANG W G,LI J,LI J H,et al. Assessment of wetland ecosystem health in the Liaohe River delta[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica ,2005(3):408-414.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] Ülo Mander,Mitsch W J. Biogeochemical aspects of ecosystem restoration and rehabilitation[J]. Ecological Engineering ,2011,37(7):1003-1007.
[3] Hood G A,Larson D G. Ecological engineering and aquatic connectivity: a new perspective from beaver-modified wetlands[J]. Freshwater Biology ,2015,60(1):198-208.
[4] Simenstad C A,Thom R M. Functional equivalency trajectories of the restored Gog-Le-Hi-Te estuarine wetland[J]. Ecological Applications ,1996,6(1):38-56.
[5] KONISKY R A,BURDICK D M,DIONNE M,et al. A regional assessment of salt marsh restoration and monitoring in the gulf of maine[J]. Restoration Ecology ,2006,14(4):516-525.
[6] Fernández J B G,Novo F G. High-intensity versus low-intensity restoration alternatives of a tidal marsh in Guadalquivir estuary,SW Spain[J]. Ecological Engineering ,2007,30(2):112-121.
[7] 王晖,廖炜,陈峰云,等. 长江三峡库区水土流失现状及治理对策探讨[J]. 人民长江,2007(8):34-36,50.
WANG H,LIAO W,CHEN F Y,et al. Characteristics and countermeasures of soil and water loss in three gorges reservoir area of Yangtze River [J]. Yangtze River ,2007(8):34-36,50.(in Chinese)
[8] 华国春,李艳玲,黄川友,等. 拉萨拉鲁湿地生态恢复评价指标体系研究[J]. 四川大学学报(工程科学版),2005,37(6):20-25.
HUA G C,LI Y L,HUANG C Y,et al. Study on the assess index system of the ecological restoration to the lalu wetland in Tibet [J]. Journal of Sichuan University ( Engineering Science Edition ),2005,37(6):20-25.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] 邵全琴,樊江文,刘纪远,等. 三江源生态保护和建设一期工程生态成效评估[J]. 地理学报,2016(1):3-20.
SHAO Q Q,FAN J W,LIU J Y,et al. Assessment on the effects of the first-stage ecological conservation and restoration project in Sanjiangyuan region[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica ,2016(1):3-20.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] 张蕊. 北塘地区生态水系构建与水质保育研究[D]. 天津:天津大学,2012.
ZHANG R. Beitang ecological water system construction and water quality conservation research [D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University,2012.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] 田小海,朱建强,金卫斌,等. 江汉平原湿地农业技术体系探讨[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2003(1):78-82.
TIAN X H,ZHU J Q,JIN W B,et al. On the technological systems for wetland farming in Jianghan plain [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin ,2003(1): 78-82.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] 黄海萍,陈彬,俞炜炜,等. 厦门五缘湾滨海湿地生态恢复成效评估[J]. 应用海洋学学报,2015(4):501-508.
HUANG H P,CHEN B,YU W W,et al. Evaluation of the Coastal Wetland restoration on Wuyuan Bay of Xiamen [J]. Journal of Applied Oceanography ,2015(4):501-508.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] 葛振鸣. 长江口滨海湿地迁徙水禽群落特征及生境修复策略[D]. 上海:华东师范大学,2007.
GE Z M. Yangtze River Estuary coastal wetland migratory waterfowl community characteristics and habitat restoration strategy [D]. Shang hai : East China Normal University ,2007.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] 孟伟,范俊韬,张远. 流域水生态系统健康与生态文明建设[J]. 环境科学研究,2015(10):1495-1500.
MENG W,FAN J T,ZHANG Y. Freshwater ecosystem health and ecological civilization construction at the watershed scale [J]. Research of Environmental Sciences ,2015(10):1495-1500.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] 孟伟. 辽河流域水污染治理和水环境管理技术体系构建——国家重大水专项在辽河流域的探索与实践[J]. 中国工程科学,2013(3):4-10.
MENG W. Construction of the technology system for watershed water pollution treatment and management-exploration and practice of the major water program in Liaohe River Basin [J]. China Engineering Science ,2013(3):4-10.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] 喻理飞,朱守谦,叶镜中,等. 退化喀斯特森林自然恢复评价研究[J]. 林业科学,2000(6):12-19.
YU L F,ZHU S Q,YE J Z,et al. A study on evaluation of natural restoration for degraded karst forest [J]. Scientia Silave Sinicae ,2000(6):12-19.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[17] 贺凤春,朱红松,俞隽,等. 苏州太湖湿地公园规划设计[J]. 风景园林,2014(增刊1):60-61.
HE F C,ZHU H S,YU J,et al. Suzhou Taihu Lake Wetland Park Planning and Design [J]. Landscape Architecture ,2014(Suppl.1):60-61.(in Chinese)
[18] 朱颖,冯育青,苏群,等. 水网地区湿地公园景观评价研究——以苏州太湖国家湿地公园为例[J]. 西北林学院学报,2016(3):304-308.
ZHU Y,FENG Y Q,SU Q,et al. Landscape evaluation of wetland park in water-network region-a case study of Taihu national wetland park at Suzhou [J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University ,2016(3):304-308.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] 贺凤春,俞隽. 多学科合作的苏州太湖湿地公园规划设计[J]. 风景园林,2009(2):80-85.
HE F C,YU J. A Multidisciplinary Landscape Master Planning of Suzhou Taihu Lake wetland park [J]. Landscape Architecture ,2009(2):80-85.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[20] 蔡琨,张杰,徐兆安,等. 应用底栖动物完整性指数评价太湖生态健康[J]. 湖泊科学,2014(1):74-82.
CAI K,ZHANG J,XU Z A,et al. Application of a Benthic Index of biotic integrity for the ecosystem health assessment of Lake Taihu [J]. Journal of Lake Sciences ,2014(1):74-82.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] 肖艳芳,赵文吉,朱琳,等. 北京市湿地生态系统非使用价值[J]. 生态学杂志,2011(4):824-830.
XIAO Y F,ZHAO W J,ZHU L,et al. Non-use value of Wetland ecosystem in Beijing [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology ,2011(4): 824-830.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[22] 高明,吴雪萍. 基于熵权灰色关联法的北京空气质量影响因素分析[J]. 生态经济,2017(3):142-147.
GAO M,WU X P.Air quality and Its influencing factors in Beijing based on entropy-weighted grey correlation model [J]. Ecological Economy ,2017(3):142-147.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] 杨伟山. 层次分析法(AHP)在建设工程施工招标评标中的应用[J]. 沿海企业与科技,2006(10):70-72.
YANG W S. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in the bidding evaluation for construction of construction projects [J]. Coastal Enterprises and Technology ,2006(10):70-72.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] 曹柬,方学礼,徐世浩. 基于层次分析法的毕业论文(设计)综合评价方法[J]. 数学的实践与认识,2010(20):30-37.
CAO J,FANG X L,XU S H. Study and practice on an AHP-based synthetical evaluation method to appraising the graduation thesis [J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory ,2010(20):30-37.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[25] 黄海萍. 滨海湿地生态恢复成效评估研究[D]. 厦门:国家海洋局第三海洋研究所,2012.
HUANG H P. Study on assessment of coastal wetland ecological restoration: A case study of Wuyuan Bay in Xiamen [D]. Xiamen: Institute of Oceanography,State Oceanic Administration,third,2012.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[26] 张文涛. 湖库富营养化评价方法和分级标准的讨论[C]//中国水利学会水文专业委员会.水生态监测与分析论文集. 北京:中国水利学会水文专业委员会,2008.
ZHANG W T. Discussion on eutrophication assessment methods and classification criteria [C]//Proceedings of water ecology monitoring and analysis. Beijing : Chinese hydrological society hydrology Specialized Committee ,2008.(in Chinese)
[27] 陆铭锋,徐彬,杨旭昌. 太湖水质评价计算方法及近年来水质变化分析[J]. 水资源保护,2008(5):30-33.
LU M F,XU B,YANG X C. Evaluation method for water quality of Taihu lake and its variation in recent years [J]. Water Resources Protection ,2008(5):30-33.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[28] 陈星星,黄振华,吴越,等. 浙南沿海沉积物中重金属污染及其潜在生态危害评价[J]. 浙江农业学报,2016,28(1):139-144.
CHEN X X,HUANG Z H,WU Y,et al. Ecological risk of heavy metals in surfaces sediment in coastal areas in southern Zhejiang [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ,2016,28(1):139-144.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[29] 彭益书,付培,杨瑞东. 草海湿地生态系统健康评价[J]. 地球与环境,2014(1):68-81.
PENG Y S,FU P,YANG R D. Assessment of wetland ecosystem health in the Caohai lake of Guizhou province [J]. Earth and Environment ,2014(1):68-81.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[30] 魏遐,王洁宇. 基于AHP的湿地公园体验价值评价研究——以杭州西溪湿地公园为例[J]. 云南民族大学学报(自然科学版),2013(2):104-108.
WEI Y,WANG J Y. AHP analysis of the visitor experience vaule in such wetland: parks like Xixi wetland park [J]. Journal of Yunnan University (Natural Science Edition),2013(2):104-108.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[31] 郑允文,薛达元,张更生. 我国自然保护区生态评价指标和评价标准[J]. 农村生态环境,1994(3):22-25.
ZHENG Y W,XUE D Y,ZHANG G S. Study on ecological evaluation criteria and standards for nature reserve in China [J]. Rural Eco-Environment ,1994(3):22-25.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[32] 任利霞. 水网城市湿地公园景观评价与优化策略研究[D]. 苏州:苏州科技学院,2015.
REN L X. Study on Evaluation and optimization strategy of water city wetland park landscape [D]. Suzhou: Suzhou University of Science and Technology,2015.(in Chinese with English abstract)

太湖国家湿地公园生态恢复成效评估研究

Study on effectiveness evaluation of ecological restoration of Taihu National Wetland Park

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	高云1，詹慧龙2，*，赵跃龙1，李树君1，矫健3. 国家现代农业示范区竞争力评价及区域优势分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(10): 1841-.
[2]	徐可成;王薛婷;张美玲;阮超静;林芳;朴美花;*. 杭州西溪国家湿地公园蛾类多样性研究[J]. , 2014, 26(2): 0-388392.
[3]	张小鸋;付英*;马燕玲. 农村扶贫开发动态评价指标体系构建研究 ——以兰州市为例[J]. , 2014, 26(1): 0-234.
[4]	张凤龙;;童洪志;;谢必武. 现代农业主导产业选择实证分析 ——以重庆万州区为例[J]. , 2013, 25(5): 0-1158.
[5]	裴文;姜涛;杨芳绒;李鹏;杨秋生;*. 鹤壁市故县湿地公园景观生态规划研究[J]. , 2013, 25(2): 0-267.
[6]	杨年芳;严奉宪. 基于复杂系统的柑橘产业链脆弱性研究[J]. , 2011, 23(1): 164-169.
[7]	孙利祥;黄惠芳. 大棚辣椒品种比较及其果实品质的灰色关联分析[J]. , 2005, 17(6): 0-371.
[8]	赵军华;俞忠良;楼肖成;郭章贤. 应用关联分析法综合评估糯玉米新品种[J]. , 2002, 14(5): 0-287.