两种池塘养殖模式水质因子和浮游植物群落比较分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2020.02.16

浙江农业学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 317-326.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2020.02.16

两种池塘养殖模式水质因子和浮游植物群落比较分析

张雷鸣^1,2, 原居林², 倪蒙², 刘梅², 郭爱环², 练青平², 王海洋², 顾志敏^1,2,*

1.上海海洋大学水产与生命学院,上海 201306;
2.浙江省淡水水产研究所农业农村部淡水渔业健康养殖重点实验室,浙江湖州 313001

收稿日期:2019-06-17 出版日期:2020-02-25 发布日期:2020-03-13
通讯作者: *顾志敏,E-mail:guzhimin2006@163.com
作者简介:张雷鸣(1994—),男,河北新河人,硕士研究生,研究方向为水域生态修复。E-mail:zhangleiming1994@163.com
基金资助:
浙江省重点研发计划(2017C02026,2018C02033); 湖州市乡村振兴专项(2018ZD2025)

Comparative analysis of water quality factors and phytoplankton communities in two different aquaculture models

ZHANG Leiming^1,2, YUAN Julin², NI Meng², LIU Mei², GUO Aihuan², LIAN Qingping², WANG Haiyang², GU Zhimin^1,2,*

1.College of Fisheries and Life Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Healthy Freshwater Aquaculture of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhejiang Institute of Freshwater Fishries, Huzhou 313001, China

Received:2019-06-17 Online:2020-02-25 Published:2020-03-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为揭示池塘内循环流水养殖模式(IPA)池塘和传统池塘养殖模式浮游植物群落的生物多样性,开展了对两种模式水质、浮游植物群落的监测。结果表明,IPA模式共鉴定出浮游植物64种(属),传统池塘养殖模式共鉴定出浮游植物49种(属),且IPA模式池塘浮游植物的平均密度和平均生物量为113.55×10⁶ ind·L^-1和52.79 mg·L^-1,均高于传统池塘养殖模式的78.37×10⁶ ind·L^-1和23.22 mg·L^-1。IPA模式浮游植物Shannon-Wiener多样性指数(H’)平均值为3.80,Margalef指数(D)平均值为2.25,均高于传统池塘;典范对应分析(CCA)显示,IPA模式影响浮游植物的主要驱动因子有水温、高锰酸盐指数、总氮、总磷、总有机碳,而传统池塘养殖模式影响浮游植物的主要驱动因子有总氮、总磷、总氨氮、亚硝态氮。

关键词: 池塘内循环流水养殖模式, 浮游植物群落, 典范对应分析

Abstract: In order to reveal the biodiversity of phytoplankton in IPA model and traditional aquaculture ponds, water quality and phytoplankton communities were monitored. The results showed that 64 phytoplankton species were identified in the IPA model, and 49 phytoplankton species were identified in the traditional aquaculture pond, and the average density and biomass of phytoplankton in the IPA model were 113.55×10⁶ ind·L^-1 and 52.79 mg·L^-1, which were higher than the 78.37×10⁶ ind·L^-1 and 23.22 mg·L^-1 in the traditional aquaculture pond. The mean values of Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H') and Margalef diversity index (D) in IPA mode were 3.80 and 2.25 respectively, which were higher than those in the traditional aquaculture pond. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) showed that water temperature, potassium permanganate index, total nitrogen, total phosphorus and total organic carbon were the main driving factors affecting phytoplankton in IPA mode; total nitrogen, total phosphorus, total ammonia nitrogen and nitrite nitrogen were the main driving factors affecting phytoplankton in the traditional aquaculture pond.

Key words: internal-circulation pond aquaculture, phytoplankton, canonical correspondence analysis

中图分类号:

S931.5

张雷鸣, 原居林, 倪蒙, 刘梅, 郭爱环, 练青平, 王海洋, 顾志敏. 两种池塘养殖模式水质因子和浮游植物群落比较分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(2): 317-326.

ZHANG Leiming, YUAN Julin, NI Meng, LIU Mei, GUO Aihuan, LIAN Qingping, WANG Haiyang, GU Zhimin. Comparative analysis of water quality factors and phytoplankton communities in two different aquaculture models[J]. , 2020, 32(2): 317-326.

参考文献

[1] 程海华, 胡廷尖, 陈建明, 等. 池塘循环水养殖加州鲈驯化阶段的几点体会[J]. 科学养鱼, 2017(12): 44-45.
CHENG H H, HU T J, CHEN J M, et al.Experiences of domestication of California carp in pond recirculating aquaculture[J]. Scientific Fish Farming, 2017(12): 44-45.(in Chinese)
[2] 王亚军, 林文辉, 吴淑勤, 等. 鳜塘水质与原生动物群落多样性关系的初步研究[J]. 水产学报, 2006, 30(1): 69-75.
WANG Y J, LIN W H, WU S Q, et al.The relationship between protozoan community diversity and water quality in ponds for the culture of Siniperca chuatsi[J]. Journal of Fisheries of China, 2006, 30(1): 69-75.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] 魏泽能, 崔凯, 李海洋, 等. 安徽省池塘内循环流水特色养殖模式构建与效果分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2018, 46(15): 84-86.
WEI Z N, CUI K, LI H Y, et al.Construction and effect analysis of in-pond aquaculture model in Anhui Province[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(15): 84-86.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[4] 胡韧, 林秋奇, 段舜山, 等. 热带亚热带水库浮游植物叶绿素a与磷分布的特征[J]. 生态科学, 2002, 21(4): 310-315.
HU R, LIN Q Q, DUAN S S, et al.Distribution of chlorophyll-a and phosphorus in subtropical reservoirs, South China[J]. Ecologic Science, 2002, 21(4): 310-315.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] 王旭娜, 江敏, 钟锐, 等. 凡纳滨对虾养殖池塘中浮游植物群落结构与水质因子的关系[J]. 水产学报, 2018, 42(11): 1787-1803.
WANG X N, JIANG M, ZHONG R, et al.The relationship between phytoplankton community structure and water quality factors in the pond of Litopenaeus vannamei[J]. Journal of Fisheries of China, 2018, 42(11): 1787-1803.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] 李学梅, 朱永久, 龚进玲, 等. 高密度鳙池塘分区养殖浮游动物群落结构及水环境特征[J]. 水生生物学报, 2018, 42(2): 400-405.
LI X M, ZHU Y J, GONG J L, et al.Zooplankton community composition and environmental characteristic in block partition pond with high density of bighead carp(Aristichthys nobilis)[J]. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica, 2018, 42(2): 400-405.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] 李丹丹. 不同模式罗非鱼养殖池塘浮游生物群落结构动态变化[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2015.
LI D D.The dynamic changes of plankton community structure in different tilapia aquaculture ponds[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2015.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] 王玉彬. 茅莲湖水产养殖池塘中浮游生物的研究[D]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2007.
WANG Y B.Studies on the plankton of aquaculture ponds in Maolian Lake[D]. Nanchang: Nanchang University, 2007.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] 张继民, 刘霜, 张琦, 等. 黄河口附近海域浮游植物种群变化[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2010, 29(6): 834-837.
ZHANG J M, LIU S, ZHANG Q, et al.Population variation of phytoplankton around Yellow River estuary[J]. Marine Environmental Science, 2010, 29(6): 834-837.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] 查广才, 周昌清, 黄建荣, 等. 凡纳对虾淡化养殖虾池微型浮游生物群落及多样性[J]. 生态学报, 2004, 24(8): 1752-1759.
ZHA G C, ZHOU C Q, HUANG J R, et al.Studies on the structure and biodiversity of the microplankton community in Litopenaeus vannamai desalination culture ponds[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2004, 24(8): 1752-1759.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] 杨秀兰,王爱敏,薄学锋,等.浮游生物在盐碱地封闭式对虾养殖中的生态作用[J].齐鲁渔业,2002(10):5-8.
YANG X L, WANG A M, BO X F, et al.The ecologieal function of plankton in the closed saline-alkali prawn pond[J].Shandong Fisheries, 2002(10):5-8. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] 查广才,麦雄伟,周昌清,等.凡纳滨对虾低盐度养殖池浮游藻类群落研究[J].海洋水产研究,2006,27(1):1-7.
ZHA G C, MAI X W, ZHOU C Q, et al.Study on the planktonic algae community in low salinity culture ponds of Litopenaeus vannamei[J]. Marine Fisheries Research, 2006,27(1):1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] 郝俊, 马旭洲, 王武, 等. 河蟹生态养殖池浮游植物功能类群的结构特征[J]. 湖泊科学, 2016, 28(5): 1047-1056.
HAO J, MA X Z, WANG W, et al.Structure of phytoplankton functional groups in the ecological farming crab ponds[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2016, 28(5): 1047-1056.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] 郭永坚, 朱长波, 阴晓丽, 等. 凡纳滨对虾-鲻网围分隔混养池塘浮游植物群落结构特征的研究[J]. 南方水产科学, 2015, 11(1): 45-54.
GUO Y J, ZHU C B, YIN X L, et al.Characteristics of phytoplankton community in mesh enclosure isolated ponds with polyculture of Litopenaeus vannamei and Mugil cephalus[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2015, 11(1): 45-54.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] 李宝华,魏俊利,孙广明,等.循环水养殖罗非鱼和淡水白鲳中氮磷的循环与平衡[J].天津水产, 2004(2): 25-30.
LI B H,WEI J L,SUN G M, et al.Circulation and balance of nitrogen and phosphorus in chilled tilapia and freshwater chalk[J].Tianjin Fisheries, 2004(2): 25-30. (in Chinese)
[16] 孙灵毅, 王力勇, 徐惠章. 单细胞藻类对营养盐类的吸收[J]. 水产科技情报, 2003, 30(3): 119-120.
SUN L Y, WANG L Y, XU H Z.Unicellular algae and the absorption of nutrient salts[J]. Fisheries Science & Technology Information, 2003, 30(3): 119-120.(in Chinese)
[17] 赵旭斌, 王广军, 郁二蒙, 等. 两种深度养殖池塘水质和浮游藻类多样性分析[J]. 上海海洋大学学报, 2010, 19(4): 535-539.
ZHAO X B, WANG G J, YU E M, et al.Analysis of water quality and phytoplankton diversity of the two different depth ponds[J]. Journal of Shanghai Ocean University, 2010, 19(4): 535-539.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[18] 孙儒泳. 动物生态学原理. [M]. 3版. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2001.
[19] 张家路,王银平,蔺丹清,等.安庆新洲水域浮游植物群落结构特征[J].上海海洋大学学报,2019, 28(5): 680-688.
ZHANG J L,WANG Y P, LIN D Q, et al.Characteristics of community structure of phytoplankton of Xinzhou waters in Anqing[J]. Journal of Shanghai Ocean University, 2019, 28(5): 680-688. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20] PAERL H W, HALL N S, PEIERLS B L, et al.Hydrologic variability and its control of phytoplankton community structure and function in two shallow, coastal, lagoonal ecosystems: the Neuse and new river estuaries, North Carolina, USA[J]. Estuaries and Coasts, 2014, 37(S1): 31-45.
[21] 刘晓彤. 夏、秋季黄河口及其邻近海域浮游植物群落结构和粒级结构的研究[D]. 青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2011.
LIU X T.Studies on community structure and size-fractioned structure of phytoplankton in Yellow River estuary and its adjacent area in summer and autumn[D]. Qingdao: Ocean University of China, 2011.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[22] MCQUOID M R.Influence of salinity on seasonal germination of resting stages and composition of microplankton on the Swedish West coast[J]. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 2005, 289: 151-163.

两种池塘养殖模式水质因子和浮游植物群落比较分析

Comparative analysis of water quality factors and phytoplankton communities in two different aquaculture models

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价