浙江农业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 1133-1140.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.06.04
收稿日期:
2021-09-08
出版日期:
2022-06-25
发布日期:
2022-06-30
通讯作者:
杜龙岗
作者简介:
*杜龙岗,E-mail: dlg138@163.com基金资助:
REN Mengyun(), DU Longgang(), WANG Meixing, HUANG Yifeng
Received:
2021-09-08
Online:
2022-06-25
Published:
2022-06-30
Contact:
DU Longgang
摘要:
摘 要:糯玉米采收后的鲜食品质是衡量品种优劣的重要标准之一,为进一步探讨糯玉米品质形成与可溶性糖含量的关系,以63份糯玉米自交系为材料,采用高效液相色谱-蒸发光散射检测法(HPLC-ELSD)测定采后不同贮藏期果穗中可溶性糖含量,同时测定其中8份优异材料蒸煮前后可溶性糖含量的变化。结果表明:蒸煮前后糯玉米果穗中都含有果糖、葡萄糖和蔗糖。鲜样中,蔗糖含量最高,平均含量为44.22 mg·g-1,占可溶性糖的65.60%,果糖和葡萄糖含量接近,平均含量分别为11.30 mg·g-1和10.49 mg·g-1。鲜样中可溶性糖含量高低主要是由蔗糖决定。蒸煮过后,糯玉米熟样中蔗糖和还原性糖含量均下降。可溶性糖和蔗糖是判断糯玉米生化甜度的两个重要指标。随着贮藏时间的延长,糯玉米鲜样中可溶性糖含量呈下降趋势,降解速率的快慢主要由蔗糖决定。根据可溶性糖含量与降解速率,筛选了两份糯玉米特异可溶性糖种质,研究结果可为鲜食玉米采后保鲜技术提供科学依据。
中图分类号:
任梦云, 杜龙岗, 王美兴, 黄益峰. 糯玉米可溶性糖组分特征与采后品质特性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(6): 1133-1140.
REN Mengyun, DU Longgang, WANG Meixing, HUANG Yifeng. Characteristics of soluble sugar components in waxy corn and its postharvest quality[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(6): 1133-1140.
材料Materials | 果糖Fructose | 葡萄糖Glucose | 蔗糖Sucrose | 麦芽糖Maltose | 可溶性总糖Soluble sugar |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | 8.64 i | 9.04 jk | 65.24 e | — | 82.92 ef |
N2 | 5.53 lm | 6.35 no | 67.49 de | — | 79.37 f |
N3 | 7.07 k | 5.35 o | 27.99 n | — | 40.42 n |
N4 | 13.07 e | 11.97 fg | 52.90 gf | — | 77.94 f |
N5 | 14.69 d | 15.14 de | 46.95 fg | — | 76.78 f |
N6 | 8.54 ij | 9.03 jk | 42.28 hi | — | 59.85 i |
N7 | 6.89 k | 8.69 kl | 29.56 n | — | 45.14 m |
N8 | 2.54 n | 3.00 p | 19.61 o | — | 25.14 q |
N9 | 7.06 k | 7.56 lm | 31.42 n | — | 46.04 m |
N10 | 11.57 f | 9.28 j | 50.54 f | — | 71.38 fg |
N11 | 9.67 g | 11.71 fg | 119.24 a | 4.65 bc | 145.27 a |
N12 | 4.88 lm | 4.52 o | 12.08 p | — | 21.48 q |
N13 | 8.71 hi | 7.79 lm | 35.98 kl | 3.75 cd | 56.22 j |
N14 | 9.58 gh | 8.82 k | 33.19 l | 3.52 d | 55.11 k |
N15 | 11.92 ef | 11.53 gh | 61.82 e | 2.61 ef | 87.87 e |
N16 | 11.50 f | 10.38 hi | 57.06 f | — | 78.95 f |
N17 | 9.39 h | 8.41 kl | 50.54 f | — | 68.34 gh |
N18 | 6.83 k | 7.55 m | 44.50 gh | — | 58.88 i |
N19 | 15.72 d | 12.19 ef | 55.16 fg | 5.18 b | 88.24 de |
N20 | 10.51 fg | 9.96 hij | 40.33 i | — | 60.80 i |
N21 | 7.84 j | 7.92 l | 37.23 jk | 2.85 e | 55.84 jk |
N22 | 9.75 fg | 10.46 hi | 34.63 l | — | 54.84 k |
N23 | 12.93 e | 11.33 gh | 38.82 j | 2.54 ef | 65.61 h |
N24 | 10.67 fg | 10.08 hi | 42.07 hi | — | 62.82 h |
N25 | 14.72 d | 13.76 e | 52.55 gf | 4.43 c | 85.46 ef |
N26 | 8.96 hi | 8.19 l | 29.29 n | 3.77 cd | 50.21 l |
N27 | 15.03 d | 13.85 e | 63.25 e | — | 92.14 d |
N28 | 7.95 ij | 9.25 jk | 44.99 gh | — | 62.19 hi |
N29 | 11.93 ef | 11.60 g | 53.72 g | 2.56 ef | 79.81 f |
N30 | 8.28 ij | 7.22 m | 40.78 i | 5.23 b | 61.51 hi |
N31 | 8.42 ij | 7.13 m | 44.06 hi | 3.06 de | 62.67 hi |
N32 | 8.34 ij | 6.88 mn | 44.31 gh | 2.43 ef | 61.95 hi |
N33 | 10.89 fg | 12.17 f | 37.85 jk | — | 60.92 i |
N34 | 7.16 jk | 6.40 n | 36.27 k | — | 49.83 lm |
N35 | 6.63 k | 5.13 o | 20.89 o | 3.23 d | 35.88 o |
N36 | 11.28 fg | 12.19 ef | 22.61 no | — | 46.08 m |
N37 | 7.48 jk | 7.86 lm | 29.50 n | — | 44.84 mn |
N38 | 4.62 m | 5.25 o | 21.85 o | — | 31.72 p |
N39 | 11.57 f | 12.08 fg | 42.51 hi | — | 66.16 h |
N40 | 11.35 fg | 10.59 hi | 53.31 gf | 3.19 d | 78.44 f |
N41 | 13.10 e | 13.00 e | 48.07 fg | 3.49 d | 77.65 f |
N42 | 16.82 cd | 13.85 e | 80.91 b | 5.79 b | 117.38 b |
N43 | 12.40 ef | 10.69 gh | 75.95 cd | — | 99.04 c |
N44 | 5.80 l | 5.90 no | 25.96 n | — | 37.65 n |
N45 | 12.89 e | 11.86 fg | 74.44 cd | — | 99.19 c |
N46 | 10.91 fg | 10.32 hi | 34.64 l | 3.30 d | 59.17 i |
N47 | 14.07 de | 11.01 gh | 43.80 hi | 2.51 ef | 71.38 f |
N48 | 10.54 fg | 10.37 hi | 36.76 k | — | 57.66 ij |
N49 | 10.68 fg | 9.84 i | 38.47 jk | 3.86 cd | 62.85 h |
N50 | 10.21 fg | 8.89 jk | 46.46 fg | 4.19 c | 69.75 g |
N51 | 8.15 ij | 6.37 n | 29.71 mn | 7.72 a | 51.95 kl |
N52 | 25.95 b | 25.62 c | 45.43 g | — | 97.00 c |
N53 | 18.29 c | 16.78 d | 32.83 l | — | 67.89 gh |
N54 | 5.25 lm | 5.64 o | 21.47 o | — | 32.37 p |
N55 | 9.67 gh | 10.64 h | 44.24 h | — | 64.54 h |
N56 | 13.78 de | 16.05 d | 36.58 k | — | 66.42 gh |
N57 | 7.78 jk | 9.01 jk | 71.28 d | — | 88.08 de |
N58 | 11.83 f | 13.33 e | 73.47 cd | — | 98.64 c |
N59 | 42.24 b | 29.64 a | 1.33 q | — | 73.21 g |
N60 | 43.71 a | 26.64 b | 1.41 q | — | 71.76 gf |
N61 | 6.08 kl | 6.11 no | 41.12 hi | 2.29 f | 55.60 jk |
N62 | 11.25 fg | 11.67 fg | 70.56 d | 2.26 f | 95.74 cd |
N63 | 10.22 fg | 9.97 hi | 76.80 c | — | 96.99 c |
最大值Maximum | 43.71 | 29.64 | 119.24 | 7.72 | 145.27 |
最小值Minimum | 2.54 | 3.00 | 1.33 | — | 21.48 |
平均值Means | 11.30±6.87 | 10.49±4.77 | 44.22±19.86 | 1.40±1.97 | 67.42±22.19 |
变异系数Coefficient of variation/% | 60.78 | 45.44 | 44.91 | 140.54 | 32.92 |
比例Proportion/% | 16.76 | 15.56 | 65.60 | 2.08 | - |
表1 不同类型糯玉米自交系可溶性糖组分差异
Table 1 Content of soluble sugar components in different waxy corns mg·g-1
材料Materials | 果糖Fructose | 葡萄糖Glucose | 蔗糖Sucrose | 麦芽糖Maltose | 可溶性总糖Soluble sugar |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | 8.64 i | 9.04 jk | 65.24 e | — | 82.92 ef |
N2 | 5.53 lm | 6.35 no | 67.49 de | — | 79.37 f |
N3 | 7.07 k | 5.35 o | 27.99 n | — | 40.42 n |
N4 | 13.07 e | 11.97 fg | 52.90 gf | — | 77.94 f |
N5 | 14.69 d | 15.14 de | 46.95 fg | — | 76.78 f |
N6 | 8.54 ij | 9.03 jk | 42.28 hi | — | 59.85 i |
N7 | 6.89 k | 8.69 kl | 29.56 n | — | 45.14 m |
N8 | 2.54 n | 3.00 p | 19.61 o | — | 25.14 q |
N9 | 7.06 k | 7.56 lm | 31.42 n | — | 46.04 m |
N10 | 11.57 f | 9.28 j | 50.54 f | — | 71.38 fg |
N11 | 9.67 g | 11.71 fg | 119.24 a | 4.65 bc | 145.27 a |
N12 | 4.88 lm | 4.52 o | 12.08 p | — | 21.48 q |
N13 | 8.71 hi | 7.79 lm | 35.98 kl | 3.75 cd | 56.22 j |
N14 | 9.58 gh | 8.82 k | 33.19 l | 3.52 d | 55.11 k |
N15 | 11.92 ef | 11.53 gh | 61.82 e | 2.61 ef | 87.87 e |
N16 | 11.50 f | 10.38 hi | 57.06 f | — | 78.95 f |
N17 | 9.39 h | 8.41 kl | 50.54 f | — | 68.34 gh |
N18 | 6.83 k | 7.55 m | 44.50 gh | — | 58.88 i |
N19 | 15.72 d | 12.19 ef | 55.16 fg | 5.18 b | 88.24 de |
N20 | 10.51 fg | 9.96 hij | 40.33 i | — | 60.80 i |
N21 | 7.84 j | 7.92 l | 37.23 jk | 2.85 e | 55.84 jk |
N22 | 9.75 fg | 10.46 hi | 34.63 l | — | 54.84 k |
N23 | 12.93 e | 11.33 gh | 38.82 j | 2.54 ef | 65.61 h |
N24 | 10.67 fg | 10.08 hi | 42.07 hi | — | 62.82 h |
N25 | 14.72 d | 13.76 e | 52.55 gf | 4.43 c | 85.46 ef |
N26 | 8.96 hi | 8.19 l | 29.29 n | 3.77 cd | 50.21 l |
N27 | 15.03 d | 13.85 e | 63.25 e | — | 92.14 d |
N28 | 7.95 ij | 9.25 jk | 44.99 gh | — | 62.19 hi |
N29 | 11.93 ef | 11.60 g | 53.72 g | 2.56 ef | 79.81 f |
N30 | 8.28 ij | 7.22 m | 40.78 i | 5.23 b | 61.51 hi |
N31 | 8.42 ij | 7.13 m | 44.06 hi | 3.06 de | 62.67 hi |
N32 | 8.34 ij | 6.88 mn | 44.31 gh | 2.43 ef | 61.95 hi |
N33 | 10.89 fg | 12.17 f | 37.85 jk | — | 60.92 i |
N34 | 7.16 jk | 6.40 n | 36.27 k | — | 49.83 lm |
N35 | 6.63 k | 5.13 o | 20.89 o | 3.23 d | 35.88 o |
N36 | 11.28 fg | 12.19 ef | 22.61 no | — | 46.08 m |
N37 | 7.48 jk | 7.86 lm | 29.50 n | — | 44.84 mn |
N38 | 4.62 m | 5.25 o | 21.85 o | — | 31.72 p |
N39 | 11.57 f | 12.08 fg | 42.51 hi | — | 66.16 h |
N40 | 11.35 fg | 10.59 hi | 53.31 gf | 3.19 d | 78.44 f |
N41 | 13.10 e | 13.00 e | 48.07 fg | 3.49 d | 77.65 f |
N42 | 16.82 cd | 13.85 e | 80.91 b | 5.79 b | 117.38 b |
N43 | 12.40 ef | 10.69 gh | 75.95 cd | — | 99.04 c |
N44 | 5.80 l | 5.90 no | 25.96 n | — | 37.65 n |
N45 | 12.89 e | 11.86 fg | 74.44 cd | — | 99.19 c |
N46 | 10.91 fg | 10.32 hi | 34.64 l | 3.30 d | 59.17 i |
N47 | 14.07 de | 11.01 gh | 43.80 hi | 2.51 ef | 71.38 f |
N48 | 10.54 fg | 10.37 hi | 36.76 k | — | 57.66 ij |
N49 | 10.68 fg | 9.84 i | 38.47 jk | 3.86 cd | 62.85 h |
N50 | 10.21 fg | 8.89 jk | 46.46 fg | 4.19 c | 69.75 g |
N51 | 8.15 ij | 6.37 n | 29.71 mn | 7.72 a | 51.95 kl |
N52 | 25.95 b | 25.62 c | 45.43 g | — | 97.00 c |
N53 | 18.29 c | 16.78 d | 32.83 l | — | 67.89 gh |
N54 | 5.25 lm | 5.64 o | 21.47 o | — | 32.37 p |
N55 | 9.67 gh | 10.64 h | 44.24 h | — | 64.54 h |
N56 | 13.78 de | 16.05 d | 36.58 k | — | 66.42 gh |
N57 | 7.78 jk | 9.01 jk | 71.28 d | — | 88.08 de |
N58 | 11.83 f | 13.33 e | 73.47 cd | — | 98.64 c |
N59 | 42.24 b | 29.64 a | 1.33 q | — | 73.21 g |
N60 | 43.71 a | 26.64 b | 1.41 q | — | 71.76 gf |
N61 | 6.08 kl | 6.11 no | 41.12 hi | 2.29 f | 55.60 jk |
N62 | 11.25 fg | 11.67 fg | 70.56 d | 2.26 f | 95.74 cd |
N63 | 10.22 fg | 9.97 hi | 76.80 c | — | 96.99 c |
最大值Maximum | 43.71 | 29.64 | 119.24 | 7.72 | 145.27 |
最小值Minimum | 2.54 | 3.00 | 1.33 | — | 21.48 |
平均值Means | 11.30±6.87 | 10.49±4.77 | 44.22±19.86 | 1.40±1.97 | 67.42±22.19 |
变异系数Coefficient of variation/% | 60.78 | 45.44 | 44.91 | 140.54 | 32.92 |
比例Proportion/% | 16.76 | 15.56 | 65.60 | 2.08 | - |
图1 八份糯玉米材料蒸煮前后平均可溶性糖含量 同种糖的柱状图上无相同小写字母的表示在5%水平上差异显著。下同。
Fig.1 Mean content of soluble sugar before and after steaming in 8 waxy corn lines Different lowercase letters above the same sugar columns indicated significant different at P<0.05. The same as below.
样品类别 Sample category | 指标 Index | 鲜样Raw | 熟样Steamed | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
果糖Fructose | 葡萄糖Glucose | 蔗糖Sucrose | 可溶性糖Soluble sugar | 生化甜度Biochemical sweetness | 果糖Fructose | 葡萄糖Glucose | 蔗糖Sucrose | 可溶性糖Soluble sugar | ||
鲜样Raw | 葡萄糖Glucose | 0.961** | ||||||||
蔗糖Sucrose | -0.151 | 0.072 | ||||||||
可溶性糖Soluble sugar | 0.308 | 0.511 | 0.893* | |||||||
生化甜度Biochemical sweetness | 0.401 | 0.591 | 0.845* | 0.995** | ||||||
熟样Steamed | 果糖Fructose | 0.896* | 0.894* | 0.055 | 0.457 | 0.534 | ||||
葡萄糖Glucose | 0.883* | 0.906* | 0.04 | 0.443 | 0.517 | 0.985** | ||||
蔗糖Sucrose | 0.87 | 0.917* | 0.307 | 0.686 | 0.752 | 0.946* | 0.915* | |||
可溶性糖Soluble sugar | 0.888* | 0.926* | 0.237 | 0.629 | 0.699 | 0.973** | 0.951* | 0.995** | ||
生化甜度Biochemical sweetness | 0.889* | 0.924* | 0.229 | 0.621 | 0.691 | 0.976** | 0.952* | 0.994** | 1.000** |
表2 糯玉米可溶性糖组分含量相关性分析
Table 2 Correlation coefficient among soluble sugar components in waxy corn
样品类别 Sample category | 指标 Index | 鲜样Raw | 熟样Steamed | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
果糖Fructose | 葡萄糖Glucose | 蔗糖Sucrose | 可溶性糖Soluble sugar | 生化甜度Biochemical sweetness | 果糖Fructose | 葡萄糖Glucose | 蔗糖Sucrose | 可溶性糖Soluble sugar | ||
鲜样Raw | 葡萄糖Glucose | 0.961** | ||||||||
蔗糖Sucrose | -0.151 | 0.072 | ||||||||
可溶性糖Soluble sugar | 0.308 | 0.511 | 0.893* | |||||||
生化甜度Biochemical sweetness | 0.401 | 0.591 | 0.845* | 0.995** | ||||||
熟样Steamed | 果糖Fructose | 0.896* | 0.894* | 0.055 | 0.457 | 0.534 | ||||
葡萄糖Glucose | 0.883* | 0.906* | 0.04 | 0.443 | 0.517 | 0.985** | ||||
蔗糖Sucrose | 0.87 | 0.917* | 0.307 | 0.686 | 0.752 | 0.946* | 0.915* | |||
可溶性糖Soluble sugar | 0.888* | 0.926* | 0.237 | 0.629 | 0.699 | 0.973** | 0.951* | 0.995** | ||
生化甜度Biochemical sweetness | 0.889* | 0.924* | 0.229 | 0.621 | 0.691 | 0.976** | 0.952* | 0.994** | 1.000** |
[1] |
GONG K J, CHEN L R. Characterization of carbohydrates and their metabolizing enzymes related to the eating quality of postharvest fresh waxy corn[J]. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 2013, 37(5): 619-627.
DOI URL |
[2] | 孟昭东, 韩静, 张发军, 等. 糯玉米杂交育种研究[J]. 玉米科学, 2001, 9(4): 14-17. |
MENG Z D, HAN J, ZHANG F J, et al. Discuss on waxy corn breeding strategies[J]. Maize Sciences, 2001, 9(4): 14-17. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] |
GONG K J, CHEN L R, LI X Y, et al. Lignin accumulation and biosynthetic enzyme activities in relation to postharvest firmness of fresh waxy corn[J]. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 2018, 42(1): e13333.
DOI URL |
[4] |
KETTHAISONG D, SURIHARN B, TANGWONGCHAI R, et al. Changes in physicochemical properties of waxy corn starches at different stages of harvesting[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2013, 98(1): 241-248.
DOI URL |
[5] |
HUANG H B, DANAO M G C, RAUSCH K D, et al. Diffusion and production of carbon dioxide in bulk corn at various temperatures and moisture contents[J]. Journal of Stored Products Research, 2013, 55: 21-26.
DOI URL |
[6] | 龚魁杰, 陈利容, 朱立贵, 等. 鲜食糯玉米采后与食用品质相关的糖代谢变化[J]. 食品科技, 2011, 36(12): 170-173. |
GONG K J, CHEN L R, ZHU L G, et al. Changes of carbohydrate metabolism related eating quality of postharvest fresh waxy corn[J]. Food Science and Technology, 2011, 36(12): 170-173. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] |
SIMLA S, LERTRAT K, SURIHARN B. Carbohydrate characters of six vegetable waxy corn varieties as affected by harvest time and storage duration[J]. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 2010, 9(8): 463-470.
DOI URL |
[8] |
AZANZA F, KLEIN B P, JUVIK J A. Sensory characterization of sweet corn lines differing in physical and chemical composition[J]. Journal of Food Science, 1996, 61(1): 253-257.
DOI URL |
[9] |
ZHOU X, LIM S T. Pasting viscosity and in vitro digestibility of retrograded waxy and normal corn starch powders[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2012, 87(1): 235-239.
DOI URL |
[10] |
SZYMANEK M, TANAŚ W, KASSAR F H. Kernel carbohydrates concentration in sugary-1, sugary enhanced and shrunken sweet corn kernels[J]. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 2015, 7: 260-264.
DOI URL |
[11] | 龚魁杰, 陈利容, 赵全胜, 等. 鲜食糯玉米采后糖代谢相关酶活性变化[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 2010, 46(11): 1159-1163. |
GONG K J, CHEN L R, ZHAO Q S, et al. Changes of enzyme activities associated with carbohydrate metabolism in postharvest fresh Zea mays L. sinensis Kulesh[J]. Plant Physiology Communications, 2010, 46(11): 1159-1163. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | ZHANG H Y, DONG S T, GAO R Q, et al. Comparison of starch synthesis and related enzyme activities in developing grains among different types of maize[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology, 2007, 33(1): 25-32. |
[13] | 王浩, 刘景圣, 郑明珠, 等. 鲜食糯玉米贮藏过程中淀粉含量及相关酶活性变化的研究[J]. 中国粮油学报, 2017, 32(3): 6-10, 24. |
WANG H, LIU J S, ZHENG M Z, et al. Research on the change of starch content and enzymes activities associated with starch synthesis in fresh-eating waxy corn in the process of storage[J]. Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association, 2017, 32(3): 6-10, 24. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] |
PRIOUL J L, MÉCHIN V, LESSARD P, et al. A joint transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolic analysis of maize endosperm development and starch filling[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2008, 6(9): 855-869.
DOI URL |
[15] | 董宗宗, 乔勇进, 刘晨霞, 等. 不同采收期对鲜食糯玉米品质影响的研究[J]. 上海农业学报, 2020, 36(4): 19-24. |
DONG Z Z, QIAO Y J, LIU C X, et al. Study on the influence of different harvesting times on the quality of fresh waxy corn[J]. Acta Agriculturae Shanghai, 2020, 36(4): 19-24. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 张文婷, 陆秋艳. 亚热带水果中糖组分的测定及分析[J]. 营养学报, 2019, 41(3): 308-312. |
ZHANG W T, LU Q Y. Determination and analysis of sugars in subtropical fruits[J]. Acta Nutrimenta Sinica, 2019, 41(3): 308-312. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 陆新华, 吴青松, 刘胜辉, 等. 菠萝种质果实可溶性糖组分及含量分析[J]. 热带作物学报, 2012, 33(5): 936-940. |
LU X H, WU Q S, LIU S H, et al. Analysis for components and contents of soluble sugars in pineapple germplasm[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2012, 33(5): 936-940. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] |
RUAN Y L. Sucrose metabolism: gateway to diverse carbon use and sugar signaling[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2014, 65: 33-67.
DOI URL |
[19] |
CHEN M, JIANG Q, YIN X R, et al. Effect of hot air treatment on organic acid- and sugar-metabolism in Ponkan (Citrus reticulata) fruit[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2012, 147: 118-125.
DOI URL |
[20] | 陈永欣, 翟广谦. 甜糯玉米采收与保鲜技术研究[J]. 华北农学报, 2001, 16(4): 87-91. |
CHEN Y X, ZHAI G Q. Studies on the techniques of optimum-harvesting and fresh-keeping of sweet and waxy maize[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreall-Sinica, 2001, 16(4): 87-91. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 蔡马, 贺立红, 冯颖竹, 等. 果蔬型糯玉米采后不同温度储藏下的营养品质分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2008, 16(2): 150-152. |
CAI M, HE L H, FENG Y Z, et al. Nutrition analysis of waxy corn after harvest in different temperature storage[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2008, 16(2): 150-152. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 马鹏, 郝秀芬, 孙瑞, 等. 糯玉米鲜果穗采收后鲜籽粒可溶性糖含量变化的研究[J]. 天津农学院学报, 2013, 20(2): 22-24. |
MA P, HAO X F, SUN R, et al. Researches on soluble sugar content changes in fresh kernel of post-harvest fresh ears of waxy maize[J]. Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2013, 20(2): 22-24. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 李昊, 刘景圣, 王浩, 等. 鲜食糯玉米贮藏过程中可溶性糖含量变化的研究[J]. 中国食物与营养, 2014, 20(3): 23-27. |
LI H, LIU J S, WANG H, et al. Changes of soluble sugar content in fresh corn in the process of storage[J]. Food and Nutrition in China, 2014, 20(3): 23-27. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] |
TAKAHATA Y, NODA T, SATO T. Changes in carbohydrates and enzyme activities of sweetpotato lines during storage[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1995, 43(7): 1923-1928.
DOI URL |
[25] | 何煜, 刘景圣, 王浩, 等. 鲜食玉米贮藏期关键酶活性变化及淀粉含量关系研究概况[J]. 中国食物与营养, 2013, 19(6): 28-31. |
HE Y, LIU J S, WANG H, et al. Relationship between changes in key enzyme activity and starch content of fresh maize during storage[J]. Food and Nutrition in China, 2013, 19(6): 28-31. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] |
TANG N, DENG W, HU N, et al. Metabolite and transcriptomic analysis reveals metabolic and regulatory features associated with Powell orange pulp deterioration during room temperature and cold storage[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2016, 112: 75-86.
DOI URL |
[27] | 肖金宝, 杨丽, 梁宇鹏, 等. 收获后贮藏时间对鲜食玉米品质的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2020, 28(6): 71-80. |
XIAO J B, YANG L, LIANG Y P, et al. Influences of storage time on quality of fresh-eaten maize after harvest[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2020, 28(6): 71-80. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 高伦江, 张雪梅, 曾顺德, 等. 渝糯851鲜食糯玉米采后生理生化研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2013, 26(3): 942-946. |
GAO L J, ZHANG X M, ZENG S D, et al. Research on physiology and biochemistry of postharvest fresh-eating glutinous maize ‘YuNuo 851'[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 26(3): 942-946. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 岳建华, 董艳, 李文杨, 李蒙, 张琰. pH对百子莲体胚诱导期生理特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(8): 1405-1414. |
[2] | 孟幼青, 翁海勇, 岑海燕, 李红叶, 何勇. 潜伏期柑橘黄龙病宿主糖代谢及近红外光谱特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(3): 428-435. |
[3] | 吕桂华1, 陈坚剑1, 徐秀红2, 郭国锦1,*. 鲜食糯玉米苞叶相关性状的遗传相关分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(7): 1122-. |
[4] | 伊祖涛1,张海艳1,2,*. 糯玉米胚乳重组淀粉的糊化和流变学特性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(6): 907-. |
[5] | 吕桂华;徐秀红;陈坚剑;郭国锦*. 浙江省近年来审定糯玉米品种主要性状演变分析[J]. , 2014, 26(3): 0-537542. |
[6] | 谢小波;戚行江;*;金伟;项康华;陈伟立;梁森苗;郑锡良;求盈盈;何欢. 杨梅果实糖分积累及其代谢酶活性变化规律[J]. , 2013, 25(1): 0-52. |
[7] | 张古文;胡齐赞;徐盛春;龚亚明*. 菜用大豆籽粒发育过程中蔗糖积累及相关酶活性的研究[J]. , 2012, 24(6): 0-1020. |
[8] | 王晨;房经贵;王涛;谭洪花. 果树果实中的糖代谢[J]. , 2009, 21(05): 0-534. |
[9] | 石建尧;王桂跃. 糯玉米区域试验非平衡数据产量性状及稳定性分析[J]. , 2008, 20(2): 0-134. |
[10] | 梁英龙;陈俊伟;秦巧平;谢鸣;蒋桂华;吴江;程建徽. 疏果对设施栽培草莓“枥乙女”单果重、糖代谢与积累的影响[J]. , 2006, 18(4): 0-252. |
[11] | 赵军华;俞忠良;楼肖成;郭章贤. 应用关联分析法综合评估糯玉米新品种[J]. , 2002, 14(5): 0-287. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||