新制度经济学理论视角下农业供应链融资模式的双向困境及其破解机制——以浙江省衢州市柯城区柑橘供应链为例

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20226924

浙江农业学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 1937-1949.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20226924

新制度经济学理论视角下农业供应链融资模式的双向困境及其破解机制——以浙江省衢州市柯城区柑橘供应链为例

李梦琪^a(), 郭沛^a^,^*(), 柯雪龙^b

中国农业大学 a. 经济管理学院;b. 人文与发展学院,北京 100193

收稿日期:2022-06-22 出版日期:2023-08-25 发布日期:2023-08-29
作者简介:李梦琪(1996—),女,福建龙岩人,博士研究生,主要从事农村金融研究。E-mail: Li_Mengqi@yeah.net
通讯作者: *郭沛,E-mail: guopei@cau.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重大项目(17ZDA113);国家社会科学基金(21BSH057);世界银行中国经济改革促进与能力加强技术援助项目(TCC6)子项目(202007211110159)

Bidirectional dilemma of agricultural supply chain financing mode and cracking mechanism based on perspective of new institutional economics: a case study of citrus supply chain in Kecheng District, Quzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China

LI Mengqi^a(), GUO Pei^a^,^*(), KE Xuelong^b

a. College of Economics and Management; b. College of Humanities and Development Studies, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China

Received:2022-06-22 Online:2023-08-25 Published:2023-08-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

农业供应链虽然在提升农业经营主体融资可得性上发挥了一定作用,但核心主体与中小经营主体之间的双向困境矛盾突显,具体体现为供应链主体间高信任度要求和第三方担保主体发展良莠不齐的困境、抵押担保物低成本高转换要求和农业产业资产评估不统一的困境、产业发展需求和自偿性闭环不稳定的困境。借鉴新制度经济学理论,发现相较于传统的“公司+合作社+农户”供应链融资模式,农民合作经济组织联合会(以下简称农合联)供应链融资模式在契约结构、交易成本、自偿性水平方面具有明显优势。以浙江省衢州市柯城区的柑橘供应链为例,对其破解双向困境的机制进行分析验证。研究发现,农合联集正规制度约束和非正规社会约束于一体,能够有效提升供应链的合作效应、协同效应、分工效应,缓解融资困境。据此认为,缓解农业供应链融资模式双向困境的突破口在于构建经营主体共建共享的新的农业社会化服务组织,立足专业化服务,强化市场化经营,助力规模化发展,实现供应链一体化管理。

关键词: 新制度经济学, 农业供应链, 融资模式, 双向困境, 破解机制, 农民合作经济组织联合会

Abstract:

Although the agricultural supply chain plays a certain role in improving the availability of financing for agricultural operators, the bidirectional dilemma between the core subject and small- and medium-sized agricultural operators is prominent, which is specifically reflected in: the requirement of high trust degree among supply chain players and the dilemma of uneven development of third-party guarantors, the low cost and high conversion requirements of collateral and the inconsistent evaluation of agricultural industry assets, the demand for industrial development and the instability of self-compensation closed-loop. Based on the theory of new institutional economics, it is found that compared with the traditional supply chain financing model of “company+cooperative+farmer”, the supply chain financing model of Farmers Cooperatives Union has obvious advantages in terms of contract structure, transaction cost and self-compensation level. The citrus supply chain in Kecheng District, Quzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China is selected as an example, and the cracking mechanism of bidirectional dilemma is analyzed and verified. It is found that the new agricultural socialized service organizations represented by Farmers Cooperatives Union can integrate formal institutional constraints and informal social constraints, and have strong advantages in information, transaction costs and self-compensation, which can effectively improve the cooperation effect, synergistic effect and division of labor effect of supply chain, and alleviate financing difficulties. Therefore, the breakthrough to alleviating the bidirectional dilemma of agricultural supply chain financing mode lies in the construction of new agricultural socialized service organization, which should be co-built and shared by operating entities based on specialized service, strengthening market-oriented operation and promoting large-scale development.

Key words: new institutional economics, agricultural supply chain, financing mode, bidirectional dilemma, cracking mechanism, Farmers Cooperatives Union

中图分类号:

F321.42

李梦琪, 郭沛, 柯雪龙. 新制度经济学理论视角下农业供应链融资模式的双向困境及其破解机制——以浙江省衢州市柯城区柑橘供应链为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(8): 1937-1949.

LI Mengqi, GUO Pei, KE Xuelong. Bidirectional dilemma of agricultural supply chain financing mode and cracking mechanism based on perspective of new institutional economics: a case study of citrus supply chain in Kecheng District, Quzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(8): 1937-1949.

图/表 6

图1 农业供应链融资模式的双向困境

Fig.1 Bidirectional dilemma of agricultural supply chain financing mode

图2 农合联供应链融资模式机制示意图

Fig.2 Mechanism diagram of Farmers Cooperatives Union supply chain financing model

图3 农业供应链融资双向困境的破解思路

Fig.3 Solution of bidirectional dilemma of agricultural supply chain financing

图4 缓解契约信任困境的机理图

Fig.4 Mechanism diagram for easing trust dilemma of contract

图5 缓解抵押担保高成本困境的机理图

Fig.5 Mechanism diagram for easing high cost of mortgage guarantees

图6 缓解自偿性困境机理图

Fig.6 Mechanism diagram for alleviating self-compensatory dilemmas

参考文献 17

[1]	许玉韫, 张龙耀. 农业供应链金融的数字化转型: 理论与中国案例[J]. 农业经济问题, 2020, 41(4): 72-81.
	XU Y Y, ZHANG L Y. Digital transformation of agricultural supply chain finance: theory and case study[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2020, 41(4): 72-81. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	生吉萍, 莫际仙, 于滨铜, 等. 区块链技术何以赋能农业协同创新发展:功能特征、增效机理与管理机制[J]. 中国农村经济, 2021(12): 22-43.
	SHENG J P, MO J X, YU B T, et al. Blockchain technology enabling agricultural collaborative innovation and development: functional characteristics, synergistic mechanism and management mechanism[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2021(12): 22-43. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	WUTTKE D A, BLOME C, FOERSTL K, et al. Managing the innovation adoption of supply chain finance: empirical evidence from six European case studies[J]. Journal of Business Logistics, 2013, 34(2): 148-166.
[4]	蒋伯亨, 温涛. 农业供应链金融(ASCF)研究进展[J]. 农业经济问题, 2021, 42(2): 84-97.
	JIANG B H, WEN T. Research progress on agricultural supply chain finance(ASCF)[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2021, 42(2): 84-97. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	董翀, 冯兴元. 农业现代化的供应链金融服务问题与解决路径[J]. 学术界, 2020(12): 130-139.
	DONG C, FENG X Y. Problems and solutions of supply chain financial services in agricultural modernization[J]. Academics, 2020(12): 130-139. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	李光荣. 农业供应链金融信用风险致因研究: 系统框架与实证分析: 来自黄河中上游五省区的780份调查数据[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2020, 41(3): 17-24.
	LI G R. Research on a systemic framework and empirical analysis of agricultural supply chain finance credit risk based on 780 survey data from participants in five provinces of China[J]. The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics, 2020, 41(3): 17-24. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	罗建强, 姜亚文, 李洪波. 农机社会化服务生态系统:制度分析及实现机制: 基于新制度经济学理论视角[J]. 农业经济问题, 2021, 42(6): 34-46.
	LUO J Q, JIANG Y W, LI H B. Socialized agricultural machinery service ecosystems: institutional analysis and realization mechanism: based on the perspective of new institutional economics[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2021, 42(6): 34-46. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	何得桂, 公晓昱. 农业价值链视角下小农户融入社会化服务体系的有效实现路径[J]. 农村经济, 2021(11): 95-103.
	HE D G, GONG X Y. An effective path for small farmers to integrate into the socialized service system from the perspective of agricultural value chain[J]. Rural Economy, 2021(11): 95-103. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	彭建仿. 农业社会化服务供应链的形成与演进[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 16(4): 45-52.
	PENG J F. Formation path and evolution mechanism of the agricultural social service supply chain[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 2017, 16(4): 45-52. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	贾汉星, 郭文波. 双循环新发展格局下供应链金融信用传导机制分析与对策: 基于核心企业结构洞视角[J]. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(5): 160-168.
	JIA H X, GUO W B. Analysis of supply chain financial credit transmission mechanism under the new development pattern of dual circulation and some countermeasures: in light of core enterprise structural holes[J]. Journal of Capital Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), 2021(5): 160-168. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	郑小玉, 刘冬梅, 曹智. 农业科技社会化服务体系: 内涵、构成与发展[J]. 中国软科学, 2020(10): 56-64.
	ZHENG X Y, LIU D M, CAO Z. Agricultural science and technology socialization service system: connotation, composition and development[J]. China Soft Science, 2020(10): 56-64. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	彭建仿, 胡森森. 农业社会化服务供应链的商业模式创新[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 18(6): 1-11.
	PENG J F, HU S S. On the construction of agricultural socialized service supply chain[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 2019, 18(6): 1-11. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	陈林, 商文江. 新时代小农与社会化服务研究[J]. 行政管理改革, 2018(7): 56-60.
	CHEN L, SHANG W J. A study on small farmers and socialized services[J]. Administration Reform, 2018(7): 56-60. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	周雪光, 艾云. 多重逻辑下的制度变迁: 一个分析框架[J]. 中国社会科学, 2010(4): 132-150.
	ZHOU X G, AI Y. Multiple logics in institutional change: toward an analytical framework[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2010(4): 132-150. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	江光辉, 胡浩. 农业企业纵向一体化契约模式选择及动态演变:基于生猪养殖企业的案例分析[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 22(3): 164-176.
	JIANG G H, HU H. Agricultural enterprises’ vertical integration contract mode selection and dynamic evolution: case analysis based on the pig breeding industry[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 22(3): 164-176. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	高杰. 基于不完全契约理论的农业准一体化经营组织分析[J]. 经济问题探索, 2013(1): 123-127.
	GAO J. Analysis of agricultural quasi-integrated management organization based on incomplete contract theory[J]. Inquiry into Economic Issues, 2013(1): 123-127. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	郑晓书, 王芳. 一个不完全契约履约效率的案例研究: 基于农业循环经济项目的实践逻辑[J]. 农业经济问题, 2021, 42(10): 64-77.
	ZHENG X S, WANG F. A case study on the execution efficiency of incomplete contracts: based on the practice of agricultural circular economy project[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2021, 42(10): 64-77. (in Chinese with English abstract)

新制度经济学理论视角下农业供应链融资模式的双向困境及其破解机制——以浙江省衢州市柯城区柑橘供应链为例

Bidirectional dilemma of agricultural supply chain financing mode and cracking mechanism based on perspective of new institutional economics: a case study of citrus supply chain in Kecheng District, Quzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 17

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价