浙江农业学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 1285-1296.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20250797
• 综述 • 上一篇
收稿日期:2025-12-27
出版日期:2026-06-25
发布日期:2026-07-14
作者简介:汤晓,研究方向为药品植物开发利用及其在食品保鲜中的应用。E-mail:laymantang@126.com
基金资助:Received:2025-12-27
Published:2026-06-25
Online:2026-07-14
摘要:
动物性食品营养丰富、生物价高,但极易发生食源性病原菌污染。传统的新鲜度检测方法样品制备程序复杂,检测耗时,具有破坏性,需要熟练人员操作。相比之下,新型快速无损检测技术具有灵敏度高、响应时间短、操作简便和非侵入性等特点,但其数据精准性仍有待提高。近年来,深度学习技术的飞速发展为食品新鲜度检测提供了新的技术手段,可提供更为准确的识别结果,并可实现高通量检测。本文系统分析了深度学习在动物性食品新鲜度快速无损检测中的应用,包括常用新鲜度快速无损检测技术的优缺点,深度学习在蛋类、畜禽肉、水产品等主要动物性食品快速无损检测中的应用,以及不同深度学习模型对这些技术的适配性及其改进效果,并对深度学习的局限与发展方向进行了总结与展望,旨在为深度学习在动物性食品新鲜度快速无损检测中的进一步研究应用提供参考。
中图分类号:
汤晓. 深度学习在动物性食品新鲜度快速无损检测中的应用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(6): 1285-1296.
TANG Xiao. Application of deep learning in rapid and non-destructive detection for freshness of animal-derived foods[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(6): 1285-1296.
| 技术类别 Technical category | 主要原理 Main principle | 技术分支与特点 Technical branches and characteristics | 优点 Advantages | 局限性/挑战 Limitations/ challenges |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 基于光谱学 Based on spectroscopy | 利用待测物质与电磁辐射的相互作用,以快速、非接触方式获取其物理化学性质 Utilize the interaction between the substance to be tested and electromagnetic radiation to obtain its physicochemical properties in a rapid and non-contact manner | (1)高光谱成像(HIS):结合光谱与空间信息。(2)近红外光谱(NIRS):研究最广泛,已被定为标准方法。(3)拉曼光谱(RS)。(4)荧光光谱(FS) (1) Hyperspectral imaging (HSI): combining spectral and spatial information. (2) Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS): most widely studied and has been established as a standard method. (3) Raman spectroscopy (RS). (4) Fluorescence spectroscopy (FS) | 快速、无创、便捷,能够捕捉变质过程中的细微变化 Fast, non-invasive, and convenient, capable of capturing subtle changes during the deterioration process | (1)HSI设备专业,不易携带;(2)NIRS受样品异质性影响;(3)均需精确校准 (1) HSI equipment is specialized and not easy to carry. (2) NIRS is affected by sample heterogeneity. (3) Both require precise calibration |
| 基于化学反应颜色变化 Based on the color change of chemical reaction | 模拟动物嗅觉,使用交叉反应传感器阵列,通过颜色或荧光变化来响应目标物 Simulate animal olfaction by using a cross-reactive sensor array to respond to target substances through color or fluorescence changes | (1)色度传感阵列(CSA):通过与挥发性气体反应显色。(2)荧光传感器阵列(FSA):信号通道更丰富,灵敏度和准确性更优。(3)pH值指示剂:反映食品腐败过程中的pH值变化 (1) Chromaticity sensor array (CSA): reacts with volatile gases to produce color changes. (2) Fluorescence sensor array (FSA): rich signal channels, offering superior sensitivity and accuracy. (3) pH value indicator: reflects the pH value changes during food spoilage | 可获取多通道、多维信息,FSA性能通常优于CSA It can acquire multi-channel and multi-dimensional information. The performance of FSA is generally superior to CSA | (1)阵列颜色变化过多,视觉观察困难;(2)材料制备复杂,难以实际应用;(3)pH值指示剂敏感性不足,显色域有限 (1) The array exhibits excessive color variations, making visual observation challenging. (2) The material preparation process is complex, hindering its practical application. (3) The pH value indicator lacks sufficient sensitivity, resulting in a limited color range |
| 基于图像和声学响应 Based on image and acoustic response | 利用食品变质过程中外部特征(如颜色)或声学信号的改变进行鉴别 Identification is carried out by utilizing changes in external characteristics (such as color) or acoustic signals during the spoilage process of food | (1)计算机视觉:分析RGB图像的颜色和形态变化。(2)声学响应:通过声音信号区分(如鸡蛋) (1) Computer vision: analyzing color and morphological changes in RGB images. (2) Acoustic response: distinguishing objects (such as eggs) through sound signals | 计算机视觉操作简单,声学响应可与深度学习结合 Computer vision is easy to operate. Acoustic response can be combined with deep learning | (1)计算机视觉受设备和光照影响,需颜色校正;(2)声学响应需优化传感器和数据处理 (1) Computer vision is affected by equipment and lighting, requiring color correction. (2) Acoustic response requires optimization of sensors and data processing |
| 基于电子鼻 Based on electronic nose | 利用气体传感器阵列对样品的整体气味信息进行响应,并进行模式识别 Utilize a gas sensor array to respond to the overall odor information of the sample and perform pattern recognition | 由传感器阵列和模式识别算法组成 Consists of a sensor array and a pattern recognition algorithm | 检测速度快、重现性好、客观性强 Fast detection speed, good reproducibility and strong objectivity | (1)受环境温湿度干扰;(2)依赖人工干预进行特征提取和识别,数据处理过程复杂,适应性差 (1) Affected by environmental temperature and humidity interference. (2) Relying on manual intervention for feature extraction and recognition, complex data processing and poor adaptability |
表1 动物性食品新鲜度快速无损检测技术的比较
Table 1 Comparison of rapid non-destructive detection techniques for freshness of animal-derived foods
| 技术类别 Technical category | 主要原理 Main principle | 技术分支与特点 Technical branches and characteristics | 优点 Advantages | 局限性/挑战 Limitations/ challenges |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 基于光谱学 Based on spectroscopy | 利用待测物质与电磁辐射的相互作用,以快速、非接触方式获取其物理化学性质 Utilize the interaction between the substance to be tested and electromagnetic radiation to obtain its physicochemical properties in a rapid and non-contact manner | (1)高光谱成像(HIS):结合光谱与空间信息。(2)近红外光谱(NIRS):研究最广泛,已被定为标准方法。(3)拉曼光谱(RS)。(4)荧光光谱(FS) (1) Hyperspectral imaging (HSI): combining spectral and spatial information. (2) Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS): most widely studied and has been established as a standard method. (3) Raman spectroscopy (RS). (4) Fluorescence spectroscopy (FS) | 快速、无创、便捷,能够捕捉变质过程中的细微变化 Fast, non-invasive, and convenient, capable of capturing subtle changes during the deterioration process | (1)HSI设备专业,不易携带;(2)NIRS受样品异质性影响;(3)均需精确校准 (1) HSI equipment is specialized and not easy to carry. (2) NIRS is affected by sample heterogeneity. (3) Both require precise calibration |
| 基于化学反应颜色变化 Based on the color change of chemical reaction | 模拟动物嗅觉,使用交叉反应传感器阵列,通过颜色或荧光变化来响应目标物 Simulate animal olfaction by using a cross-reactive sensor array to respond to target substances through color or fluorescence changes | (1)色度传感阵列(CSA):通过与挥发性气体反应显色。(2)荧光传感器阵列(FSA):信号通道更丰富,灵敏度和准确性更优。(3)pH值指示剂:反映食品腐败过程中的pH值变化 (1) Chromaticity sensor array (CSA): reacts with volatile gases to produce color changes. (2) Fluorescence sensor array (FSA): rich signal channels, offering superior sensitivity and accuracy. (3) pH value indicator: reflects the pH value changes during food spoilage | 可获取多通道、多维信息,FSA性能通常优于CSA It can acquire multi-channel and multi-dimensional information. The performance of FSA is generally superior to CSA | (1)阵列颜色变化过多,视觉观察困难;(2)材料制备复杂,难以实际应用;(3)pH值指示剂敏感性不足,显色域有限 (1) The array exhibits excessive color variations, making visual observation challenging. (2) The material preparation process is complex, hindering its practical application. (3) The pH value indicator lacks sufficient sensitivity, resulting in a limited color range |
| 基于图像和声学响应 Based on image and acoustic response | 利用食品变质过程中外部特征(如颜色)或声学信号的改变进行鉴别 Identification is carried out by utilizing changes in external characteristics (such as color) or acoustic signals during the spoilage process of food | (1)计算机视觉:分析RGB图像的颜色和形态变化。(2)声学响应:通过声音信号区分(如鸡蛋) (1) Computer vision: analyzing color and morphological changes in RGB images. (2) Acoustic response: distinguishing objects (such as eggs) through sound signals | 计算机视觉操作简单,声学响应可与深度学习结合 Computer vision is easy to operate. Acoustic response can be combined with deep learning | (1)计算机视觉受设备和光照影响,需颜色校正;(2)声学响应需优化传感器和数据处理 (1) Computer vision is affected by equipment and lighting, requiring color correction. (2) Acoustic response requires optimization of sensors and data processing |
| 基于电子鼻 Based on electronic nose | 利用气体传感器阵列对样品的整体气味信息进行响应,并进行模式识别 Utilize a gas sensor array to respond to the overall odor information of the sample and perform pattern recognition | 由传感器阵列和模式识别算法组成 Consists of a sensor array and a pattern recognition algorithm | 检测速度快、重现性好、客观性强 Fast detection speed, good reproducibility and strong objectivity | (1)受环境温湿度干扰;(2)依赖人工干预进行特征提取和识别,数据处理过程复杂,适应性差 (1) Affected by environmental temperature and humidity interference. (2) Relying on manual intervention for feature extraction and recognition, complex data processing and poor adaptability |
| [1] | 王秋悦, 孙通宝, 吴晨雨, 等. 动物性食品中食源性致病菌检测技术发展概况[J]. 食品科技, 2023, 48(11): 312-318. |
| WANG Q Y, SUN T B, WU C Y, et al. Current status on detection technology of foodborne pathogens in animal-derived foods[J]. Food Science and Technology, 2023, 48(11): 312-318. | |
| [2] | YUE Z, LIN H, FANG X, et al. Identification of sea bass freshness grades using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy coupled with multivariable analysis[J]. Food Control, 2023: 147: 109594. |
| [3] | LU Z W, LI M J, CHEN M T, et al. Deep learning-assisted smartphone-based portable and visual ratiometric fluorescence device integrated intelligent gel label for agro-food freshness detection[J]. Food Chemistry, 2023, 413: 135640. |
| [4] | SINGH R, NICKHIL C, NISHA R, et al. A comprehensive review of advanced deep learning approaches for food freshness detection[J]. Food Engineering Reviews, 2025, 17:127-160. |
| [5] | 郭兴, 孙莹, 刘树萍, 等. 深度学习在食品质量与安全检测中的应用进展[J]. 食品工业科技, 2025, 46(6): 20-29. |
| GUO X, SUN Y, LIU S P, et al. Advance in application of deep learning in food quality and safety detection[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2025, 46(6): 20-29. | |
| [6] | 王祎琳, 吕艳娜, 杜健, 等. 食品新鲜度智能指示与传感技术的研究进展[J]. 包装工程, 2025, 46(23): 32-43. |
| WANG Y L, LYU Y N, DU J, et al. Research progress in intelligent indicating and sensing technologies for food freshness[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2025, 46(23): 32-43. | |
| [7] | HASAN M, VASKER N, HOSSAIN M M, et al. Framework for fish freshness detection and rotten fish removal in Bangladesh using mask R-CNN method with robotic arm and fisheye analysis[J]. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 2024, 16: 101139. |
| [8] | 李振波, 李萌, 赵远洋, 等. 基于改进VGG-19卷积神经网络的冰鲜鲳鱼新鲜度评估方法[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(22): 286-294. |
| LI Z B, LI M, ZHAO Y Y, et al. Iced pomfret freshness evaluation method based on improved VGG-19 convolutional neural networks[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2021, 37(22): 286-294. | |
| [9] | KIM T H, KIM J H, KIM J Y, et al. Egg freshness prediction model using real-time cold chain storage condition based on transfer learning[J]. Foods, 2022, 11(19): 3082. |
| [10] | WU T, LU J J, ZOU J, et al. Accurate prediction of salmon freshness under temperature fluctuations using the convolutional neural network long short-term memory model[J]. Journal of Food Engineering, 2022, 334: 111171. |
| [11] | JIN S S, LIU X H, WANG J L, et al. Hyperspectral imaging combined with fluorescence for the prediction of microbial growth in chicken breasts under different packaging conditions[J]. LWT, 2023, 181: 114727. |
| [12] | HE H Y, SUN D W, WU Z H, et al. On-off-on fluorescent nanosensing: materials, detection strategies and recent food applications[J]. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2022, 119: 243-256. |
| [13] | YILDIZ M B, YASIN E T, KOKLU M. Fisheye freshness detection using common deep learning algorithms and machine learning methods with a developed mobile application[J]. European Food Research and Technology, 2024, 250(7): 1919-1932. |
| [14] | XIONG Y W, LI Y H, WANG C Y, et al. Non-destructive detection of chicken freshness based on electronic nose technology and transfer learning[J]. Agriculture, 2023, 13(2): 496. |
| [15] | YIMENU S M, KIM J Y, KOO J, et al. Predictive modeling for monitoring egg freshness during variable temperature storage conditions[J]. Poultry Science, 2017, 96(8): 2811-2819. |
| [16] | ISWANTO B H, PUTRI D S D. Automated classification of egg freshness using acoustic signals and convolutional neural networks[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2024, 2866(1): 012052. |
| [17] | YAO K S, SUN J, ZHANG B, et al. On-line monitoring of egg freshness using a portable NIR spectrometer combined with deep learning algorithm[J]. Infrared Physics & Technology, 2024, 138: 105207. |
| [18] | ONG P, CHIU S Y, TSAI I L, et al. Nondestructive egg freshness assessment using hyperspectral imaging and deep learning with distance correlation wavelength selection[J]. Current Research in Food Science, 2025, 11: 101133. |
| [19] | HARNSOONGNOEN S, SEELA N, BUTTAKHOT S, et al. A novel microwave sensor and deep learning approach for rapid and non-destructive evaluation of egg freshness[J]. Food Control, 2026, 180: 111640. |
| [20] | ÖNDER H. Application of some artificial intelligence optimization methods to determine the freshness of eggs[J]. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, 2024, 48(3): 156-164. |
| [21] | SUN J, CHENG J H, XU M, et al. A method for freshness detection of pork using two-dimensional correlation spectroscopy images combined with dual-branch deep learning[J]. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2024, 129: 106144. |
| [22] | ZHAO X X, NING W, CHEN R X, et al. Rapid non-destructive detection of pork freshness using visible-near infrared spectroscopy based on convolutional neural network hybrid models[J]. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2025, 140: 107199. |
| [23] | CHANG J, SONG D P. RGA-net: an effective deep learning method combined with an electronic nose system to identify the pork quality[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2023, 23(19): 22161-22168. |
| [24] | LU H, SONG A Y, LI M, et al. Evaluation of the freshness (TVB-N) of pork patty during storage based on PLS-DA, SVM and BP-ANN models[J]. Food Control, 2025, 171: 111121. |
| [25] | 王炼, 柳军, 皮杰, 等. 基于YOLOv8n的猪肉新鲜度图像识别算法[J]. 食品与机械, 2025, 41(5): 98-104. |
| WANG L, LIU J, PI J, et al. Image recognition algorithm for pork freshness based on YOLOv8n[J]. Food & Machinery, 2025, 41(5): 98-104. | |
| [26] | 刘超, 张家瑜, 戚超, 等. 基于EfficientNet网络模型的猪肉新鲜度智能识别方法[J]. 食品科学, 2023, 44(24): 369-376. |
| LIU C, ZHANG J Y, QI C, et al. An intelligent method for pork freshness identification based on EfficientNet model[J]. Food Science, 2023, 44(24): 369-376. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [27] | SHIN S, LEE Y, KIM S, et al. Rapid and non-destructive spectroscopic method for classifying beef freshness using a deep spectral network fused with myoglobin information[J]. Food Chemistry, 2021, 352: 129329. |
| [28] | LIN Y D, MA J, CHENG J H, et al. Visible detection of chilled beef freshness using a paper-based colourimetric sensor array combining with deep learning algorithms[J]. Food Chemistry, 2024, 441: 138344. |
| [29] | LIN Y D, MA J, SUN D W, et al. Fast real-time monitoring of meat freshness based on fluorescent sensing array and deep learning: from development to deployment[J]. Food Chemistry, 2024, 448: 139078. |
| [30] | LI M, XU J G, PENG C F, et al. Deep learning-assisted flavonoid-based fluorescent sensor array for the nondestructive detection of meat freshness[J]. Food Chemistry, 2024, 447: 138931. |
| [31] | 周博, 吴泽玮, 吴俊, 等. 采用人工嗅视觉和深度学习法检测牛肉的新鲜度[J/OL]. 食品工业科技, 1-16(2025-11-05)[2025-11-27]. https://doi.org/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025070081. |
| ZHOU B, WU Z W, WU J, et al. Beef freshness detection using artificial olfaction-vision and deep learning[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 1-16(2025-11-05)[2025-11-27]. https://doi.org/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025070081. | |
| [32] | E J, ZHAI C J, JIANG X H, et al. Non-destructive detection of chilled mutton freshness using a dual-branch hierarchical spectral feature-aware network[J]. Foods, 2025, 14(8): 1379. |
| [33] | YI W G, ZHAO X Y, YUN X Y, et al. Automated and explainable machine learning for monitoring lipid and protein oxidative damage in mutton using hyperspectral imaging[J]. Food Research International, 2025, 203: 115905. |
| [34] | 张珏, 田海清, 张丽娜, 等. 高光谱成像技术对羊肉新鲜度的无损检测[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(12): 237-243. |
| ZHANG J, TIAN H Q, ZHANG L N, et al. Non-destructive detection of lamb freshness with hyperspectral imaging technology[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2020, 46(12): 237-243. | |
| [35] | JIAN R, LI G B, JUN X, et al. Nondestructive freshness recognition of chicken breast meat based on deep learning[J]. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15: 27538. |
| [36] | CAI M R, LI X X, LIANG J T, et al. An effective deep learning fusion method for predicting the TVB-N and TVC contents of chicken breasts using dual hyperspectral imaging systems[J]. Food Chemistry, 2024, 456: 139847. |
| [37] | GENÇİ Y, GÜRFIDAN R, YIĞIT T. Quality prediction of seabream Sparus aurata by deep learning algorithms and explainable artificial intelligence[J]. Food Chemistry, 2025, 474: 143150. |
| [38] | XU X, WANG X Y, DING Y C, et al. Integration of lanthanide MOFs/methylcellulose-based fluorescent sensor arrays and deep learning for fish freshness monitoring[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2024, 265: 131011. |
| [39] | FAN Y W, DONG R Z, LUO Y K, et al. Deep learning models with optimized fluorescence spectroscopy to advance freshness of rainbow trout predicting under nonisothermal storage conditions[J]. Food Chemistry, 2024, 454: 139774. |
| [40] | 章海亮, 周孝文, 刘雪梅, 等. 基于卷积神经网络和高光谱成像技术的多宝鱼新鲜度鉴别[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2024, 44(2): 367-371. |
| ZHANG H L, ZHOU X W, LIU X M, et al. Freshness identification of turbot based on convolutional neural network and hyperspectral imaging technology[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2024, 44(2): 367-371. | |
| [41] | ZHANG Y H, WEI C C, ZHONG Y, et al. Deep learning detection of shrimp freshness via smartphone pictures[J]. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 2022, 16: 3868-3876. |
| [42] | 王可, 张存喜, 王瑞. 基于深度学习的冰鲜红虾新鲜度智能识别[J]. 自动化与仪表, 2023, 38(11): 84-87. |
| WANG K, ZHANG C X, WANG R. Intelligent recognition of freshness of chilled red shrimp based on deep learning[J]. Automation & Instrumentation, 2023, 38(11): 84-87. | |
| [43] | JIANG C B, GUO A J X, LI Y W, et al. Inspired by human olfactory system: deep-learning-assisted portable chemo-responsive dye-based odor sensor array for the rapid sensing of shrimp and fish freshness[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2024, 484: 149283. |
| [44] | YU X J, TANG L, WU X F, et al. Nondestructive freshness discriminating of shrimp using visible/near-infrared hyperspectral imaging technique and deep learning algorithm[J]. Food Analytical Methods, 2018, 11(3): 768-780. |
| [45] | HAN Q L, LU J F, ZHU J J, et al. Non-destructive detection of freshness in crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) based on near-infrared spectroscopy combined with deep learning[J]. Food Control, 2025, 168: 110858. |
| [1] | 吕胤春, 段恩泽, 朱一星, 郑霞, 柏宗春. 基于YOLOv8-Swin Transformer模型的翻覆肉鸭实时检测[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(7): 1556-1566. |
| [2] | 郑航, 冯昊栋, 薛向磊, 叶云翔, 于健麟, 俞国红. 基于实例分割的叶菜垄间导航线提取算法研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(3): 701-711. |
| [3] | 程嘉瑜, 陈妙金, 李彤, 孙奇男, 张小斌, 赵懿滢, 朱怡航, 顾清. 基于改进Faster-RCNN网络的无人机遥感影像桃树检测[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(8): 1909-1919. |
| [4] | 潘攀, 张建华, 郑晓明, 周国民, 胡林, 冯全, 柴秀娟. 深度学习在作物及其近缘种抗病性智能鉴定上的研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(8): 1993-2012. |
| [5] | 白卫卫, 赵雪妮, 罗斌, 赵薇, 黄硕, 张晗. 基于YOLOv5的小麦种子发芽检测方法研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(2): 445-454. |
| [6] | 朱世松, 马婉丽, 赵理山, 郑艳梅, 郑先波, 芦碧波. 基于改进的LinkNet的苹果叶片图像分割算法[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(1): 202-214. |
| [7] | 陈道怀, 汪杭军. 基于改进YOLOv4的林业害虫检测[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(6): 1306-1315. |
| [8] | 李超, 李锋, 黄炜嘉. 基于并联卷积神经网络的水果品种识别[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(11): 2533-2541. |
| [9] | 张晴晴, 刘连忠, 宁井铭, 吴国栋, 江朝晖, 李孟杰, 李栋梁. 基于YOLOV3优化模型的复杂场景下茶树嫩芽识别[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(9): 1740-1747. |
| [10] | 鲍烈, 王曼韬, 刘江川, 文波, 明月. 基于卷积神经网络的小麦产量预估方法[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(12): 2244-2252. |
| [11] | 王彦翔, 张艳, 杨成娅, 孟庆龙, 尚静. 基于深度学习的农作物病害图像识别技术进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(4): 669-676. |
| [12] | 杨国亮, 许楠, 康乐乐, 龚曼, 洪志阳. 基于参数指数非线性残差神经网络的脐橙病变叶片识别[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(6): 1073-1081. |
| [13] | 赵学观, 王秀, 李翠玲, 高原源, 王松林, 冯青春. 基于主成分分析及LVQ神经网络的番茄种子品种识别[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(8): 1375-1383. |
| [14] | 胡孟晗,董庆利*,刘宝林*. 基于多阈值算法的包装箱内香蕉区域的图像分割方法[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(10): 1828-. |
| [15] | 杨春合,江朝晖*,杨宝华,陈祎琼,刘连忠. 基于移动互联网图像处理模式的作物叶片含水量检测研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(10): 1835-. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
