苕溪流域农业面源污染的综合评价

›› 2011, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (6): 0-1202.

• 环境科学 •

苕溪流域农业面源污染的综合评价

虎陈霞,周立军,黄祖庆,张忠明

中国计量学院经济与管理学院,浙江杭州 310018

收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2011-11-25 发布日期:2011-11-25

Comprehensive evaluation of water pollution caused by agricultural nonpoint source in Tiaoxi River

HU Chenxia;ZHOU Lijun;HUANG Zuqing;ZHANG Zhongming

College of Economics and Management, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018,China

Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2011-11-25 Published:2011-11-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于2008年农业统计数据,对苕溪流域所辖6个区县的水环境农业面源污染进行了分类调查,并采用等标污染负荷的评价方法对各类污染源进行评价。结果表明：2008年各农业非点源污染源流入苕溪流域水体的COD,TN和TP分别占总量的67.82%,28.75%和3.42%,等标污染负荷率COD,TN和TP分别为6.88%, 58.37%和34.75%。就各农业非点源污染源来看,畜禽粪便污染源的等标排放量和污染负荷最大,成为威胁苕溪流域水体的最大污染源。

关键词: 农业面源污染, 等标污染负荷, 污染评价, 苕溪

Abstract:

Comprehensive evaluation of agricultural nonpoint source pollution around six counties around Tiaoxi River was conducted by equal standard pollution loading method in 2008. The results indicated that the lose rates of COD, TN and TP were 6782%, 2875% and 342%, respectively. The equivalent standard pollution loading rates of COD, TN and TP were 6.88%, 58.3% and 34.75%, respectively. The equivalent standard pollution loading rates of animal and poultry feces, chemical fertilizer, breeding fish ponds, and domestic living sewage were 43.87%, 23.95%, 17.34% and 14.84%, respectively, which showed that the animals and poultry feces was the greatest agricultural nonpoint source of water system in Tiaoxi River drainage area．

Key words: agricultural nonpoint source pollution; equal standard pollution loading; pollution evaluation; Tiaoxi River

Key words: agricultural nonpoint source pollution, equal standard pollution loading, pollution evaluation, Tiaoxi River

虎陈霞;周立军;黄祖庆;张忠明 . 苕溪流域农业面源污染的综合评价[J]. , 2011, 23(6): 0-1202.

HU Chenxia;ZHOU Lijun;HUANG Zuqing;ZHANG Zhongming. Comprehensive evaluation of water pollution caused by agricultural nonpoint source in Tiaoxi River[J]. , 2011, 23(6): 0-1202.

[1]	刘琛, 张莉, 林义成, 郭彬, 傅庆林, 李华, 丁能飞. 不同施肥模式下苕溪流域水稻田和蔬菜地氮磷流失规律[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(2): 297-306.
[2]	徐丽红1，郑蔚然1，王小骊1，宋仙水2，吴文彪3，吴呈勇4. 铁皮石斛产地环境及产品中重金属的监测与污染评价 [J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(3): 429-.
[3]	强承魁;秦越华;;魏峰;陆正丽;王松松;刘恒振;周保亚;*. 徐州地区双孢蘑菇子实体重金属含量调查与分析[J]. , 2013, 25(1): 0-58.
[4]	赵连阁;徐建芬;王学渊. 浙江省农业面源污染的库兹涅茨曲线验证[J]. , 2012, 24(6): 0-1085.

苕溪流域农业面源污染的综合评价

Comprehensive evaluation of water pollution caused by agricultural nonpoint source in Tiaoxi River

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价