煤矿废弃地复垦耕地生态系统的可持续性评价

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2017.12.19

浙江农业学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (12): 2097-2103.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2017.12.19

煤矿废弃地复垦耕地生态系统的可持续性评价

丁翠¹, 马守臣¹, 李明秋^{1, *}, 孙瑞², 宋香平¹, 段佩玲²

1.河南理工大学测绘与国土信息工程学院/国土资源部野外科学观测研究基地,河南焦作 454000;
2.郑州铁路职业技术学院,河南郑州450052

收稿日期:2017-05-10 出版日期:2017-12-20 发布日期:2018-01-08
通讯作者: 李明秋,E-mail:mingqiuli@sohu.com
作者简介:丁翠(1991—),女,河南信阳人,硕士研究生,主要从事土地生态与规划方面的研究。E-mail:yxwldmq@163.com
基金资助:
河南省科技攻关项目(162102110169); 河南省高校科技创新团队支持计划(18IRTSTHN008); 河南理工大学创新型科研团队(B2017-16)

Sustainability evaluation of reclaimed cultivated land ecosystem in coal mine wasteland

DING Cui¹, MA Shouchen¹, LI Mingqiu^{1, *}, SUN Rui², SONG Xiangping¹, DUAN Peiling²

1. School of Surveying and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University/Field Scientific Observation and Research Base, Ministry of Land and Resources, Jiaozuo 454000, China;
2. Zhengzhou Railway Vocational & Technical College, Zhengzhou 450052, China

Received:2017-05-10 Online:2017-12-20 Published:2018-01-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了评价煤矿区复垦后耕地系统的可持续性,在对赵固煤矿未沉陷区、稳定沉陷区以及不稳定沉陷区复垦耕地的土壤及作物指标进行测定的基础上,基于三角形面积法,将测定的13项指标划分并转换为土壤理化性质指数、土壤微生物特性指数及作物指数,计算不同复垦耕地的可持续性指数(即三角形面积)。研究发现:未沉陷区复垦耕地的可持续性指数(1.80)大于可持续性指数临界值(1.30),可持续性较好;稳定沉陷区复垦耕地的可持续性指数(1.24)接近可持续性指数临界值;不稳定沉陷区复垦耕地可持续性指数(0.88)低于可持续性指数临界值,为不可持续状态。综上,煤矿区废弃地复垦后耕地的沉陷状态越稳定,可持续性越好,越有利于农业生产。

关键词: 几何方法, 煤矿区, 复垦, 可持续性

Abstract: To evaluate the sustainability of reclaimed cultivated land, the soil and crop indexes were determined by sampling in subsidence-free area, stable subsidence area and unstable subsidence area in Zhaogu mine area. The 13 indexes measured were divided into soil physicochemical index, soil microbial index and crop index. Then, the sustainability index was calculated based on the triangle area method. It was shown that the sustainability index of reclaimed land in subsidence-free area (1.80) was higher than the threshold of sustainability index (1.30). The sustainability index in the stable subsidence area (1.24) was close to the threshold of sustainability index, yet the sustainability index in the unstable subsidence area (0.88) was lower than the threshold of sustainability index. In summary, the more stable the subsidence state is, the more sustainable the reclaimed is for agricultural production.

Key words: geometric method, coal mining area, reclamation, sustainability

中图分类号:

S156
S158

丁翠, 马守臣, 李明秋, 孙瑞, 宋香平, 段佩玲. 煤矿废弃地复垦耕地生态系统的可持续性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(12): 2097-2103.

DING Cui, MA Shouchen, LI Mingqiu, SUN Rui, SONG Xiangping, DUAN Peiling. Sustainability evaluation of reclaimed cultivated land ecosystem in coal mine wasteland[J]. , 2017, 29(12): 2097-2103.

参考文献

[1] 付国珍, 摆万奇. 耕地质量评价研究进展及发展趋势[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(2):226-236.
FU G Z, BAI W Q. Advances and prospects of evaluating cultivated land quality[J]. Resources Science , 2015, 37(2): 226-236. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] 陈宁丽, 张红方, 张合兵,等. 基于熵权TOPSIS法的耕地生态质量空间分布格局及主控因子分析:以河南省新郑市为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(8):1444-1450.
CHEN N L, ZHANG H F, ZHANG H B, et al. Spatial distribution and dominating factors analysis of ecological quality of cultivated land based on entropy-weighting TOPSIS method: a case study of Xinzheng City, Henan Province[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis , 2015, 27(8): 1444-1450. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] 王世东, 刘毅. 基于改进模糊综合评价模型的矿区土地损毁程度评价[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23(9):1191-1198.
WANG S D, LIU Y. Evaluation of the degree of land destruction in mining areas using improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture , 2015, 23(9): 1191-1198. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4] 陈秋计. 基于GIS的煤矿区土地损毁程度评价研究[J]. 矿业研究与开发, 2013, 33(4):77-80.
CHEN Q J. Assessment of land damage degree in coal mining area based on GIS[J]. Mining Research and Development , 2013, 33(4): 77-80. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] 朱宝才, 王文龙, 梁文俊. 用ArcGIS的Python脚本计算采煤沉陷区土地损毁程度[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 36(5):371-376.
ZHU B C, WANG W L, LIANG W J. Calculate land damage degree in the coal mining subsidence area by Python, ArcGIS script language[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University ( Natural Science Edition ), 2016, 36(5): 371-376. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] 李树志, 鲁叶江, 高均海. 开采沉陷耕地损坏机理与评价定级[J]. 矿山测量, 2007(2):32-34.
LI S Z, LU Y J, GAO J H. Mechanism and grade evaluation of the farmland damage caused by the underground mining-induced subsidence[J]. Mine Surveying , 2007 (2): 32-34. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] 张鹏, 张科学, 王宁, 等. 基于GIS的开采沉陷区土地损害评价研究[J]. 煤炭技术, 2015(11):310-312.
ZHANG P, ZHANG K X, WANG N, et al. Research on land damage evaluation in mining subsidence area based on GIS[J]. Coal Technology , 2015 (11): 310-312. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] 刘文生, 韩彩娟. 模糊综合评价法在矿区塌陷土地复垦潜力评估中的应用[J]. 环境工程学报, 2008, 2(12):1711-1714.
LIU W S, HAN C J. Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation in reclaimation potential evaluation of collapse land in mining area[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering , 2008, 2(12): 1711-1714. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] 王宇, 臧妻斌. 基于模糊识别的矿区塌陷区土地复垦潜力评价[J]. 山西建筑, 2006, 32(2):120-121.
WANG Y, ZANG Q B. A fuzzy recognition comprehensive evaluation of the subsidence area reclamation potentiality[J]. Shanxi Architecture , 2006, 32(2): 120-121. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] 何书金, 苏光全. 矿区废弃土地复垦潜力评价方法与应用实例[J]. 地理研究, 2000, 19(2):165-171.
HE S J, SU G Q. Evaluation method and its application to the potentiality of wasteland reclamation of China's abandoned mining areas[J]. Geographical Research , 2000, 19(2): 165-171. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] 樊文华, 白中科, 李慧峰,等. 不同复垦模式及复垦年限对土壤微生物的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(2):330-336.
FAN W H, BAI Z K, LI H F, et al. Effects of different vegetation restoration patterns and reclamation years on microbes in reclaimed soil[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering , 2011, 27(2): 330-336. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] 刘美英, 高永, 汪季,等. 矿区复垦地土壤碳氮含量变化特征[J]. 水土保持研究, 2013, 20(1):94-97.
LIU M Y, GAO Y, WANG J, et al. Variation of soil carbon and nitrogen contents in the reclamation of coal mine area[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation , 2013, 20(1): 94-97. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] 岳辉, 毕银丽. 基于主成分分析的矿区微生物复垦生态效应评价[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(4):113-117.
YUE H, BI Y L. Evaluation on ecological effect of microbial reclamation in coal mining area based on principal component analysis[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment , 2017, 31(4): 113-117. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] 张锐, 郑华伟, 刘友兆. 基于PSR模型的耕地生态安全物元分析评价[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(16):5090-5100.
ZHANG R, ZHENG H W, LIU Y Z. Evaluation on cultivated land ecological security based on the PSR model and matter element analysis[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica , 2013, 33(16): 5090-5100. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] 李保杰, 顾和和, 纪亚洲. 矿区土地复垦景观格局变化和生态效应[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(3):251-256.
LI B J, GU H H, JI Y Z. Evaluation of landscape pattern changes and ecological effects in land reclamation project of mining area[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering , 2012, 28(3): 251-256. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] 李秀英, 李燕婷, 赵秉强,等. 褐潮土长期定位不同施肥制度土壤生产功能演化研究[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(5):683-689.
LI X Y, LI Y T, ZHAO B Q, et al. The dynamics of crop yields under different fertilization systems in drab fluvo-aquic soil[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica , 2006, 32(5): 683-689. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17] 高静, 徐明岗, 张文菊,等. 长期施肥对我国6种旱地小麦磷肥回收率的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(3):584-592.
GAO J, XU M G, ZHANG W J, et al. Influences of long-term fertilizations on phosphorus recovery efficiency of wheat in six dry upland soils of China[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science , 2009, 15(3): 584-592. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18] 李强, 许明祥, 刘国彬,等. 基于几何方法评价长期施用化肥坡耕地作物轮作系统可持续性[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18(4):884-892.
LI Q, XU M X, LIU G B, et al. Evaluation of crop rotation system sustainability in slope land under long-term chemical fertilization based on geometry method[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science , 2012, 18(4): 884-892. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] KANG G S, BERI V, SIDHU B S, et al. A new index to assess soil quality and sustainability of wheat-based cropping systems[J]. Biology & Fertility of Soils , 2005, 41(6):389-398.
[20] 孙本华, 孙瑞, 郭芸,等. 塿土区长期施肥农田土壤的可持续性评价[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(6): 1403-1412.
SUN B H, SUN R, GUO Y, et al. Evaluation on the sustainability of cropland under different long-term fertilization in Eum-Orthic Anthrosols area[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer , 2015, 21(6): 1403-1412. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] 吕国红, 周广胜, 赵先丽,等. 土壤碳氮与土壤酶相关性研究进展[J]. 辽宁气象, 2005, 21(2): 6-8.
LYU G H, ZHOU G S, ZHAO X L, et al. Advances on correlation within soil carbon and nitrogen and soil enzymes[J]. Liaoning Qixiang , 2005, 21(2): 6-8. (in Chinese)
[22] 刘宗强. 哈尔滨市耕地可持续利用评价研究[D]. 哈尔滨:东北农业大学, 2010.
LIU Z Q. Research on evaluation of sustainable use of cultivated land in Harbin City[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2010. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] 陈睿山, 蔡运龙, 严祥,等. 土地系统功能及其可持续性评价[J]. 中国土地科学, 2011, 25(1):8-15.
CHEN R S, CAI Y L, YAN X, et al. The functions of land system and its sustainability assessment[J]. China Land Science , 2011, 25(1): 8-15. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] 郝翠, 李洪远, 孟伟庆. 国内外可持续发展评价方法对比分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2010, 20(1):161-166.
HAO C, LI H Y, MENG W Q. Comparison and analysis on different methods of sustainability evaluation at home and abroad[J]. China Population Resources and Environment , 2010, 20(1): 161-166. (in Chinese with English abstract)

煤矿废弃地复垦耕地生态系统的可持续性评价

Sustainability evaluation of reclaimed cultivated land ecosystem in coal mine wasteland

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	郑铭洁, 姜铭北, 章明奎, 严建立, 王道泽. 浙江省新垦耕地土壤熟化指标研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(10): 1834-1840.
[2]	林辉, 张锦, 原倩宇, 叶静, 孙万春, 虞轶俊, 俞巧钢, 马军伟. 棘孢木霉和超微粉腐殖质改善连作土壤微生态[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(6): 1060-1069.
[3]	陶晶, 邬奇峰, 石江, 李松昊, 葛江飞, 陈俊辉, 徐秋芳, 梁辰飞, 秦华. 间作与接种丛枝菌根真菌对新垦山地玉米产量和土壤肥力的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(1): 115-123.
[4]	张宏玲, 李森, 张杨, 宋一帆, 商照聪. 泡沫阻断协同氧化修复土壤中四氯乙烯和多环芳烃[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(7): 1138-1144.
[5]	周文志, 孙向阳, 李素艳, 张乐. 生物有机材料对滨海盐碱土的改良效果[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(4): 607-615.
[6]	张杨, 李森, 张宏玲, 占升, 商照聪. 不同氧化体系去除污染土壤中多环芳烃的对比研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(10): 1748-1754.
[7]	陈红卫, 黄玲, 冯露, 李晓庆, 孟雨田, 代琳. 生物质炭基肥对农田土壤温室气体排放年际变化的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(6): 977-981.
[8]	陈英, 王东, 王顺然. 黄土高原丘陵沟壑区高标准农田建设时序研究——以天水市麦积区为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(4): 660-667.
[9]	刘冲, 王茂文, 邢锦城, 丁海荣, 朱小梅, 赵宝泉, 董静, 温祝桂, 洪立洲. 甘薯种植对苏北沿海滩涂土壤环境的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(11): 1908-1914.
[10]	代琳, 聂颖, 冯露, 许毛毛, 丁弈君, 徐红涛, 王宏燕. 生物质炭施入对白浆土碳氮变化的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(10): 1745-1754.