不同解冻方式对猪肉食用品质的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2018.04.20

浙江农业学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 666-671.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2018.04.20

不同解冻方式对猪肉食用品质的影响

林墨¹, 李官浩^{1, 2, *}, 杨慧娟³, 唐洪刚³, 肖朝耿³, 谌迪³, 叶梦迪³, 李希兹恩·安德烈·鲍里索维奇⁴, 陈黎洪^{3, *}

1.延边大学农学院,吉林延吉 133002;
2.延边大学食品研究中心,吉林延吉 133002;
3.浙江省农业科学院食品科学研究所,浙江杭州 310021;
4.俄罗斯农业科学院肉类工业研究所,俄罗斯莫斯科 101135

收稿日期:2018-01-09 出版日期:2018-04-20 发布日期:2018-04-19
通讯作者: 李官浩,E-mail:ghli@ybu.edu.cn;陈黎洪,E-mail:cwc528@163.com
作者简介:林墨(1994—),女,黑龙江海伦人,硕士,研究方向为畜产品加工。E-mail:1781876064@qq.com
基金资助:
国家国际合作项目(2014DFR31100); 国家蛋鸡产业技术体系岗位科学家(CARS-40-K26)

Effect of different thawing methods on pork eating quality

LIN Mo¹, LI Guanhao^{1, 2, *}, YANG Huijuan³, TANG Honggang³, XIAO Chaogeng³, CHEN Di³, YE Mengdi³, Li Hizen Andrei BORISOVIC⁴, CHEN Lihong^{3, *}

1. College of Agriculture, Yanbian University, Yanji 133002, China;
2. Food Research Center, Yanbian University, Yanji 133002, China;
3. Institute of Food Processing, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China;
4. Meat Industry Institute, Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Moscow 101135, Russia

Received:2018-01-09 Online:2018-04-20 Published:2018-04-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以色泽、嫩度、保水性等品质特性和蛋白质含量、脂肪含量等营养特性为指标,研究3种解冻方式,低温(空气)解冻、常温(空气)解冻、流水解冻对猪肉食用品质的影响。结果表明,低温解冻工艺可显著改善猪肉的L^*值、a^*值和b^*值,有效改善解冻后猪肉的色泽。针对不同解冻方式,低温解冻条件下猪肉的保水性和嫩度明显优于其他两组(P<0.05),解冻后猪肉品质最佳;且低温解冻后的猪肉中蛋白质和脂肪含量最高,解冻后猪肉营养最好。

关键词: 猪肉, 解冻方式, 解冻速率, 品质特性, 营养特性

Abstract: In this study, the effect of three different methods of thawing, including low temperature thawing,room temperature thawing and water thawing, on pork quality has been studied. So the index of color, tenderness, water retention, protein content and fat content has been evaluated. The results showed that low temperature thawing process can significantly improve the pork L^* value, a^* value and b^* value so that the color of thawed pork can be effectively improved. Among these three thawing methods, it is better of thawing at low temperature with higher water-holding capacity and tenderness of the pork than that of the other two groups. Moreover, the nutrition quality of pork was the best after thawing at low temperature with higher content of protein and fat.

Key words: pork, thawing method, thawing rate, quality characteristics, nutritional characteristics

中图分类号:

S828

林墨, 李官浩, 杨慧娟, 唐洪刚, 肖朝耿, 谌迪, 叶梦迪, 李希兹恩·安德烈·鲍里索维奇, 陈黎洪. 不同解冻方式对猪肉食用品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(4): 666-671.

LIN Mo, LI Guanhao, YANG Huijuan, TANG Honggang, XIAO Chaogeng, CHEN Di, YE Mengdi, Li Hizen Andrei BORISOVIC, CHEN Lihong. Effect of different thawing methods on pork eating quality[J]. , 2018, 30(4): 666-671.

参考文献

[1] 张芳, 张俊杰. 冻肉解冻技术发展综述[J]. 肉类工业, 2005(4):7-10.
ZHANG F, ZHANG J J. Review on the development of frozen meat thawing technology[J]. Food Industry , 2005 (4): 7-10. (in Chinese)
[2] 刘燕, 王锡昌, 刘源. 金枪鱼解冻方法及其品质评价的研究进展[J]. 食品科学, 2009, 30(21):476-480.
LIU Y, WANG X C, LIU Y. Thawing methods for frozen tuna and its quality evaluation: A review[J]. Food Science , 2009, 30(21):476-480.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] 高文宏, 罗嫚, 唐相伟,等. 微波解冻猪里脊肉过程的优化设计研究[J]. 现代食品科技, 2014(11):151-155.
GAO W H, LUO M, TANG X W, et al. Optimization of microwave thawing of pork loin[J]. Modern Food Science & Technology , 2014(11):151-155. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4] 唐树培, 李保国, 高志新. 高压静电场解冻羊胴体的实验研究[J]. 制冷学报, 2016, 37(3):69-73.
TANG S P, LI B G, GAO Z X. Experimental study on thawing of frozen lamb with high voltage electrostatic field[J]. Journal of Refrigeration , 2016, 37(3):69-73. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] 秦凤贤, 陈巍, 胡铁军,等. 四种不同解冻方式对鹿肉品质的影响[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2016(23):210-212.
QIN F X, CHEN W, HU T J, et al. Effect of four different thawing methods on the quality of venison[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine , 2016(23):210-212.(in Chinese)
[6] 迟海, 李学英, 杨宪时,等. 解冻方式和条件对南极磷虾品质的影响[J]. 食品与机械, 2011, 27(1):94-97.
CHI H, LI X Y, YANG X S, et al. Influence of thawing methods and factors on qualities of Euphausia superba [J]. Food & Machinery , 2011, 27(1):94-97. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] 刘著, 罗敏, 陈尔卫, 等. 鸡肉品质受解冻速率的影响分析[J]. 中国食品, 2012(12): 70-73.
LIU Z, LUO M, CHEN E W, et al. The analysis of the thawing rate influence on chicken meat[J]. China Food , 2012(12): 70-73. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] 余小领, 李学斌, 闫利萍,等. 不同冻结和解冻速率对猪肉保水性和超微结构的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2007, 23(8):261-265.
YU X L, LI X B, YAN L P, et al. Effects of different freezing and thawing rate on water-holding capacity and ultrastructure of pork[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering , 2007, 23(8):261-265. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] HOU X, HONGBO M I, MAO L. Influence of thawing methods on physico-chemical changes of Chinese shrimp ( Fenneropenaeus chinensis )[J]. Food Science , 2014, 35(4):243-247.
[10] 陆云飞, 张宾, 祝剑嫄,等. 褐藻胶寡糖对南美白对虾虾仁品质特性的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2013, 34(18):267-271.
LU Y F, ZHANG B, ZHU J Y, et al. Effect of alginate oligosaccharide on quality characteristics of Litopenaeus vannamei [J]. Food Science , 2013, 34(18):267-271. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] 夏秀芳, 孔保华, 郭园园,等. 反复冷冻-解冻对猪肉品质特性和微观结构的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(3):982-988.
XIA X F, KONG B H, GUO Y Y, et al. Effect of freeze-thawing cycles on the quality properties and microstructure of pork muscle[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica , 2009, 42(3):982-988. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] 袁莉莉, 刘书成, 解万翠,等. 虾肉和鱼肉混合肉糜凝胶特性的研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2013, 34(12):246-250.
YUAN L L, LIU S C, XIE W C, et al. Study on gel properties of surimi mixed by shrimp and fish meat[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry , 2013, 34(12):246-250. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] CHEN T H, ZHU Y P, HAN M Y, et al. Classification of chicken muscle with different freeze-thaw cycles using impedance and physicochemical properties[J]. Journal of Food Engineering , 2016, 196:94-100.
[14] 张昕, 高天, 宋蕾,等. 低温解冻相对湿度对鸡胸肉品质的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2016, 37(20):241-246.
ZHANG X, GAO T, SONG L, et al. Effects of low temperature thawing under different humidity conditions on the quality characteristics of chicken breast[J]. Food Science , 2016, 37(20):241-246. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] LEYGONIE C, BRITZ T J, HOFFMAN L C. Impact of freezing and thawing on the quality of meat: review[J]. Meat Science , 2012, 91(2):93-98.
[16] 邸静, 靳烨. 不同解冻方法对牛肉品质的影响[J]. 食品工业, 2015(1):174-177.
DI J, JIN Y. Effect of different thawing methods on beef quality[J]. Food Industry , 2015(1):174-177.(in Chinese)
[17] 常海军, 唐翠, 唐春红. 不同解冻方式对猪肉品质特性的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2014, 35(10):1-5.
CHANG H J, TANG C, TANG C H. Effects of different thawing methods on pork quality[J]. Food Science , 2014, 35(10):1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18] HUFF-LONERGAN E, LONERGAN S M. Mechanisms of water-holding capacity of meat: The role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes[J]. Meat Science , 2005, 71(1):194-204.
[19] VIEIRA C, DIAZ M T, MARTÍNEZ B, et al. Effect of frozen storage conditions (temperature and length of storage) on microbiological and sensory quality of rustic crossbred beef at different states of ageing[J]. Meat Science , 2009, 83(3):398.
[20] BENJAKUL S, BAUER F. Biochemical and physicochemical changes in catfish ( Silurus glanis Linne) muscle as influenced by different freeze-thaw cycles[J]. Food Chemistry , 2001, 72(2):207-217.
[21] XIONG Y L, DECKER E, FAUSTMAN C, et al. Protein oxidation and implications for muscle food quality[J]. Antioxidants in Muscle Foods Nutritional Strategies to Improve Quality , 2000: 85-111.
[22] 张春晖, 李侠, 李银,等. 低温高湿变温解冻提高羊肉的品质[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(6):267-273.
ZHANG C H, LI X, LI Y, et al. Low-variable temperature and high humidity thawing improves lamb quality[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering , 2013, 29(6):267-273. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] 刘燕. 金枪鱼块解冻工艺优化的研究[D]. 上海:上海海洋大学, 2011: 42-45.
LIU Y. Study on optimization of thawing methods for tuna chunk[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Ocean University, 2011: 42-45. (in Chinese with English abstract)

不同解冻方式对猪肉食用品质的影响

Effect of different thawing methods on pork eating quality

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	金俪雯, 刘增金, 刘爱军. 猪肉销售商可追溯体系参与行为及其影响因素——基于北京、上海、济南3市636位销售商的实证分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(3): 541-552.
[2]	顾静秋, 彭程, 吴华瑞, 吴建寨. 猪肉价格的时空分布格局和影响因素分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(5): 872-879.
[3]	路伏增1，罗卫斌1，盛春生2，徐如海1，戴丽荷1，姜红进1，褚晓红1，*. 生鲜猪肉鲜度指标评定及呈味核苷酸降解规律的研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(9): 1514-.
[4]	彭登峰;柴春祥*;张坤生;王伟. 不同解冻方式对冷冻荞面碗托品质的影响[J]. , 2014, 26(3): 0-592597.
[5]	乔玉强;曹承富;赵竹;杜世州;张耀兰;刘永华;张四华. 超高产小麦品种籽粒灌浆速率及其品质特性分析[J]. , 2011, 23(2): 0-225.
[6]	吕玉丽;久保长政;刘建新;徐子伟. 饲料中添加鱼油对肥育猪脂肪酸组成的影响[J]. , 2008, 20(6): 0-486.
[7]	马军伟;汪建妹;姜丽娜;叶静;王强;符建荣. 番茄新品种-浙粉202设施栽培条件下的营养特性研究[J]. , 2005, 17(5): 0-325.
[8]	叶静;陆宏;姜丽娜;马军伟;王强;汪建妹;符建荣. 青花菜营养吸收特性及专用肥配方筛选研究[J]. , 2005, 17(5): 0-333.
[9]	徐震宇;蒋经伟;鲍伟华;刘建新. 宁波市盐酸克仑特罗使用的监控与消长动态[J]. , 2004, 16(1): 0-32.