浙江农业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 170-182.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.01.20
• 农业经济与发展 • 上一篇
收稿日期:
2020-10-09
出版日期:
2021-01-25
发布日期:
2021-01-25
通讯作者:
严奉宪
作者简介:
*严奉宪,E-mail:fx_yan@mail.hzau.edu.cn基金资助:
DONG Yanmina,b(), YAN Fengxiana,b,*(
)
Received:
2020-10-09
Online:
2021-01-25
Published:
2021-01-25
Contact:
YAN Fengxian
摘要:
从生产效率、产业效益、绿色化生产、劳动者素质和农民收入5个要素层面选取14个指标构建农业高质量发展评价体系,用熵值法、莫兰指数和协调度方法测度中国(不含港、澳、台)31个省级行政区2000—2018年的农业高质量发展水平、空间相关性和协调度。结果表明:(1)2000—2018年中国农业高质量发展水平逐步上升,由2000年的0.355 39上升至2018年的0.482 40,年均增长率为1.71%。(2)中国农业高质量发展水平地区差异较大,具有集聚连片的特点,从西部地区到东部沿海,农业高质量发展水平逐步提高。相邻省级行政区的农业高质量发展水平彼此相互影响,空间相邻的省级行政区的农业高质量发展水平处于“同高同低”状态。(3)2000—2018年中国农业高质量发展各构成要素的协调度趋好,但还有待加强。(4)各省级行政区的农业高质量发展水平与当地农业高质量发展各构成要素的协调度具有一致性,即农业高质量发展水平较高的地区,其各构成要素的协调度也相对较高。
中图分类号:
董艳敏, 严奉宪. 中国农业高质量发展的时空特征与协调度[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(1): 170-182.
DONG Yanmin, YAN Fengxian. Spatial-temporal characteristics and coordination of agricultural high-quality development in China[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(1): 170-182.
要素层面 Element level | 指标层面 Indicator level | 指标衡量方式 Index measurement | 指标方向 Indicator direction |
---|---|---|---|
生产效率 Production efficiency | 劳动生产率 Labor productivity | 第一产业增加值/第一产业从业人员数量 Added value of primary industry/number of employees in primary industry | + |
机械化程度 Mechanization degree | 农业机械总动力/耕地面积 Total power of agricultural machinery/cultivated land area | + | |
土地生产率 Land productivity | 农业总产值/耕地面积 Total agricultural output/cultivated land area | + | |
产业结构调整指数 Industrial structure adjustment index | 1-(农业总产值/农林牧渔总产值) 1-(total agricultural output/total output of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery) | + | |
产业效益 Industry benefits | 农业增加值增长率 Growth rate of agricultural added value | 农业增加值/前一年农业增加值-1 Agricultural added value/previous year’s agricultural added value-1 | + |
农副产品加工业产值占比 Proportion of agricultural and sideline products processing industry output to total agricultural output | 农副产品加工业产值/农业总产值 Output of agricultural and sideline products processing industry/total agricultural output | + | |
农林牧渔服务业总产值占比 Proportion of services output to gross output of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery | 农林牧渔服务业总产值/农林牧渔总产值 Gross output of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery service/gross output of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery | + | |
绿色化生产 Green production | 有效灌溉率 Effective irrigation rate | 有效灌溉面积/耕地面积 Effective irrigation area/cultivated land area | + |
化肥施用强度 Application intensity of chemical fertilizer | 农用化肥施用量/耕地面积 Agricultural chemical fertilizer application amount/cultivated land area | - | |
塑料薄膜使用强度 Usage strength of plastic film | 农用塑料薄膜使用量/耕地面积 Agricultural plastic film usage/cultivated land area | - | |
农药使用强度 Pesticide usage intensity | 农药使用量/耕地面积 Pesticide usage/cultivated land area | - | |
劳动者素质 Quality of labors | 大专及以上农村劳动力占比 Proportion of rural labor force with junior college degree or above | 大专及以上农村劳动力数量/农村劳动力总量 Number of rural labor force with junior college degree or above/total rural labor force | + |
农民收入 Farmers’ income | 农村居民人均可支配收入 Per capita disposable income of rural residents | (农村居民总收入-家庭经营费用支出-税费支出-生产性固定资产 折旧-财产性支出-转移性支出)/家庭常住人口 (Total income of rural residents-household operating expenses-tax expenditure-depreciation of productive fixed assets-property expenditure-transfer expenditure)/permanent household population | + |
乡城收入比 Rural urban income ratio | 农村居民人均可支配收入/城镇居民人均可支配收入 Disposable income of rural residents/disposable income of urban residents | + |
表1 农业高质量发展评价指标体系
Table 1 Evaluation index system of agricultural high-quality development
要素层面 Element level | 指标层面 Indicator level | 指标衡量方式 Index measurement | 指标方向 Indicator direction |
---|---|---|---|
生产效率 Production efficiency | 劳动生产率 Labor productivity | 第一产业增加值/第一产业从业人员数量 Added value of primary industry/number of employees in primary industry | + |
机械化程度 Mechanization degree | 农业机械总动力/耕地面积 Total power of agricultural machinery/cultivated land area | + | |
土地生产率 Land productivity | 农业总产值/耕地面积 Total agricultural output/cultivated land area | + | |
产业结构调整指数 Industrial structure adjustment index | 1-(农业总产值/农林牧渔总产值) 1-(total agricultural output/total output of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery) | + | |
产业效益 Industry benefits | 农业增加值增长率 Growth rate of agricultural added value | 农业增加值/前一年农业增加值-1 Agricultural added value/previous year’s agricultural added value-1 | + |
农副产品加工业产值占比 Proportion of agricultural and sideline products processing industry output to total agricultural output | 农副产品加工业产值/农业总产值 Output of agricultural and sideline products processing industry/total agricultural output | + | |
农林牧渔服务业总产值占比 Proportion of services output to gross output of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery | 农林牧渔服务业总产值/农林牧渔总产值 Gross output of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery service/gross output of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery | + | |
绿色化生产 Green production | 有效灌溉率 Effective irrigation rate | 有效灌溉面积/耕地面积 Effective irrigation area/cultivated land area | + |
化肥施用强度 Application intensity of chemical fertilizer | 农用化肥施用量/耕地面积 Agricultural chemical fertilizer application amount/cultivated land area | - | |
塑料薄膜使用强度 Usage strength of plastic film | 农用塑料薄膜使用量/耕地面积 Agricultural plastic film usage/cultivated land area | - | |
农药使用强度 Pesticide usage intensity | 农药使用量/耕地面积 Pesticide usage/cultivated land area | - | |
劳动者素质 Quality of labors | 大专及以上农村劳动力占比 Proportion of rural labor force with junior college degree or above | 大专及以上农村劳动力数量/农村劳动力总量 Number of rural labor force with junior college degree or above/total rural labor force | + |
农民收入 Farmers’ income | 农村居民人均可支配收入 Per capita disposable income of rural residents | (农村居民总收入-家庭经营费用支出-税费支出-生产性固定资产 折旧-财产性支出-转移性支出)/家庭常住人口 (Total income of rural residents-household operating expenses-tax expenditure-depreciation of productive fixed assets-property expenditure-transfer expenditure)/permanent household population | + |
乡城收入比 Rural urban income ratio | 农村居民人均可支配收入/城镇居民人均可支配收入 Disposable income of rural residents/disposable income of urban residents | + |
区域Region | 2000 | 2003 | 2006 | 2009 | 2012 | 2015 | 2018 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
全国Nation wide | 0.355 39 | 0.360 01 | 0.369 42 | 0.398 73 | 0.435 30 | 0.458 88 | 0.482 40 |
北京Beijing | 0.466 91 | 0.448 33 | 0.482 80 | 0.532 70 | 0.569 28 | 0.557 16 | 0.576 21 |
天津Tianjin | 0.503 62 | 0.508 69 | 0.499 71 | 0.490 50 | 0.560 45 | 0.603 26 | 0.599 39 |
河北Hebei | 0.412 45 | 0.422 41 | 0.422 86 | 0.453 71 | 0.490 82 | 0.512 00 | 0.517 91 |
山西Shanxi | 0.345 40 | 0.346 93 | 0.366 82 | 0.388 55 | 0.399 07 | 0.423 77 | 0.418 30 |
内蒙古Inner Mongolia | 0.354 06 | 0.359 78 | 0.372 22 | 0.394 29 | 0.424 00 | 0.427 23 | 0.448 67 |
辽宁Liaoning | 0.370 00 | 0.383 76 | 0.414 58 | 0.457 33 | 0.494 16 | 0.479 65 | 0.467 45 |
吉林Jilin | 0.343 37 | 0.341 83 | 0.368 34 | 0.410 04 | 0.459 64 | 0.469 89 | 0.487 13 |
黑龙江Heilongjiang | 0.341 76 | 0.351 70 | 0.361 72 | 0.389 55 | 0.445 37 | 0.439 18 | 0.466 50 |
上海Shanghai | 0.379 91 | 0.397 76 | 0.409 28 | 0.458 03 | 0.491 35 | 0.506 51 | 0.567 17 |
江苏Jiangsu | 0.397 46 | 0.407 19 | 0.412 95 | 0.452 77 | 0.503 56 | 0.553 43 | 0.595 23 |
浙江Zhejiang | 0.392 38 | 0.395 57 | 0.413 15 | 0.451 36 | 0.506 61 | 0.540 36 | 0.576 66 |
安徽Anhui | 0.346 58 | 0.344 18 | 0.360 61 | 0.389 75 | 0.424 59 | 0.466 61 | 0.498 61 |
福建Fujian | 0.348 40 | 0.341 11 | 0.345 49 | 0.391 92 | 0.443 64 | 0.489 52 | 0.533 19 |
江西Jiangxi | 0.356 77 | 0.354 90 | 0.374 92 | 0.417 59 | 0.465 72 | 0.461 07 | 0.487 70 |
山东Shandong | 0.363 99 | 0.356 44 | 0.376 27 | 0.434 21 | 0.482 98 | 0.523 58 | 0.549 27 |
河南Henan | 0.369 72 | 0.362 41 | 0.373 18 | 0.388 10 | 0.418 75 | 0.447 17 | 0.467 47 |
湖北Hubei | 0.312 69 | 0.309 37 | 0.315 86 | 0.361 50 | 0.408 77 | 0.470 02 | 0.513 37 |
湖南Hunan | 0.346 91 | 0.352 78 | 0.356 81 | 0.407 63 | 0.445 00 | 0.490 86 | 0.518 28 |
广东Guangdong | 0.358 79 | 0.354 86 | 0.362 82 | 0.388 44 | 0.424 94 | 0.448 89 | 0.486 93 |
广西Guangxi | 0.330 10 | 0.326 59 | 0.337 74 | 0.358 54 | 0.386 46 | 0.422 27 | 0.444 31 |
海南Hainan | 0.355 69 | 0.345 21 | 0.338 20 | 0.322 56 | 0.373 40 | 0.389 65 | 0.457 20 |
重庆Chongqing | 0.300 72 | 0.310 44 | 0.302 56 | 0.331 29 | 0.365 13 | 0.400 86 | 0.430 08 |
四川Sichuan | 0.322 73 | 0.341 93 | 0.358 55 | 0.370 19 | 0.400 22 | 0.431 00 | 0.451 71 |
贵州Guizhou | 0.315 28 | 0.306 47 | 0.300 27 | 0.337 72 | 0.369 26 | 0.392 55 | 0.413 18 |
云南Yunnan | 0.309 19 | 0.312 90 | 0.323 91 | 0.338 94 | 0.359 96 | 0.372 29 | 0.391 75 |
西藏Tibet | 0.330 18 | 0.366 67 | 0.408 44 | 0.408 08 | 0.436 98 | 0.456 68 | 0.474 71 |
陕西Shaanxi | 0.304 83 | 0.309 83 | 0.320 31 | 0.343 08 | 0.373 42 | 0.398 95 | 0.413 83 |
甘肃Gansu | 0.289 39 | 0.294 59 | 0.300 27 | 0.357 97 | 0.364 07 | 0.387 21 | 0.374 29 |
青海Qinghai | 0.370 20 | 0.385 03 | 0.382 78 | 0.401 69 | 0.427 67 | 0.430 34 | 0.461 23 |
宁夏Ningxia | 0.335 42 | 0.352 41 | 0.348 69 | 0.367 88 | 0.385 71 | 0.416 06 | 0.427 31 |
新疆Xinjiang | 0.342 30 | 0.368 22 | 0.340 04 | 0.364 77 | 0.393 21 | 0.417 20 | 0.439 46 |
表2 2000—2018年我国农业高质量发展水平测算结果
Table 2 Calculation results of agricultural hig-quality development level in China from 2000 to 2018
区域Region | 2000 | 2003 | 2006 | 2009 | 2012 | 2015 | 2018 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
全国Nation wide | 0.355 39 | 0.360 01 | 0.369 42 | 0.398 73 | 0.435 30 | 0.458 88 | 0.482 40 |
北京Beijing | 0.466 91 | 0.448 33 | 0.482 80 | 0.532 70 | 0.569 28 | 0.557 16 | 0.576 21 |
天津Tianjin | 0.503 62 | 0.508 69 | 0.499 71 | 0.490 50 | 0.560 45 | 0.603 26 | 0.599 39 |
河北Hebei | 0.412 45 | 0.422 41 | 0.422 86 | 0.453 71 | 0.490 82 | 0.512 00 | 0.517 91 |
山西Shanxi | 0.345 40 | 0.346 93 | 0.366 82 | 0.388 55 | 0.399 07 | 0.423 77 | 0.418 30 |
内蒙古Inner Mongolia | 0.354 06 | 0.359 78 | 0.372 22 | 0.394 29 | 0.424 00 | 0.427 23 | 0.448 67 |
辽宁Liaoning | 0.370 00 | 0.383 76 | 0.414 58 | 0.457 33 | 0.494 16 | 0.479 65 | 0.467 45 |
吉林Jilin | 0.343 37 | 0.341 83 | 0.368 34 | 0.410 04 | 0.459 64 | 0.469 89 | 0.487 13 |
黑龙江Heilongjiang | 0.341 76 | 0.351 70 | 0.361 72 | 0.389 55 | 0.445 37 | 0.439 18 | 0.466 50 |
上海Shanghai | 0.379 91 | 0.397 76 | 0.409 28 | 0.458 03 | 0.491 35 | 0.506 51 | 0.567 17 |
江苏Jiangsu | 0.397 46 | 0.407 19 | 0.412 95 | 0.452 77 | 0.503 56 | 0.553 43 | 0.595 23 |
浙江Zhejiang | 0.392 38 | 0.395 57 | 0.413 15 | 0.451 36 | 0.506 61 | 0.540 36 | 0.576 66 |
安徽Anhui | 0.346 58 | 0.344 18 | 0.360 61 | 0.389 75 | 0.424 59 | 0.466 61 | 0.498 61 |
福建Fujian | 0.348 40 | 0.341 11 | 0.345 49 | 0.391 92 | 0.443 64 | 0.489 52 | 0.533 19 |
江西Jiangxi | 0.356 77 | 0.354 90 | 0.374 92 | 0.417 59 | 0.465 72 | 0.461 07 | 0.487 70 |
山东Shandong | 0.363 99 | 0.356 44 | 0.376 27 | 0.434 21 | 0.482 98 | 0.523 58 | 0.549 27 |
河南Henan | 0.369 72 | 0.362 41 | 0.373 18 | 0.388 10 | 0.418 75 | 0.447 17 | 0.467 47 |
湖北Hubei | 0.312 69 | 0.309 37 | 0.315 86 | 0.361 50 | 0.408 77 | 0.470 02 | 0.513 37 |
湖南Hunan | 0.346 91 | 0.352 78 | 0.356 81 | 0.407 63 | 0.445 00 | 0.490 86 | 0.518 28 |
广东Guangdong | 0.358 79 | 0.354 86 | 0.362 82 | 0.388 44 | 0.424 94 | 0.448 89 | 0.486 93 |
广西Guangxi | 0.330 10 | 0.326 59 | 0.337 74 | 0.358 54 | 0.386 46 | 0.422 27 | 0.444 31 |
海南Hainan | 0.355 69 | 0.345 21 | 0.338 20 | 0.322 56 | 0.373 40 | 0.389 65 | 0.457 20 |
重庆Chongqing | 0.300 72 | 0.310 44 | 0.302 56 | 0.331 29 | 0.365 13 | 0.400 86 | 0.430 08 |
四川Sichuan | 0.322 73 | 0.341 93 | 0.358 55 | 0.370 19 | 0.400 22 | 0.431 00 | 0.451 71 |
贵州Guizhou | 0.315 28 | 0.306 47 | 0.300 27 | 0.337 72 | 0.369 26 | 0.392 55 | 0.413 18 |
云南Yunnan | 0.309 19 | 0.312 90 | 0.323 91 | 0.338 94 | 0.359 96 | 0.372 29 | 0.391 75 |
西藏Tibet | 0.330 18 | 0.366 67 | 0.408 44 | 0.408 08 | 0.436 98 | 0.456 68 | 0.474 71 |
陕西Shaanxi | 0.304 83 | 0.309 83 | 0.320 31 | 0.343 08 | 0.373 42 | 0.398 95 | 0.413 83 |
甘肃Gansu | 0.289 39 | 0.294 59 | 0.300 27 | 0.357 97 | 0.364 07 | 0.387 21 | 0.374 29 |
青海Qinghai | 0.370 20 | 0.385 03 | 0.382 78 | 0.401 69 | 0.427 67 | 0.430 34 | 0.461 23 |
宁夏Ningxia | 0.335 42 | 0.352 41 | 0.348 69 | 0.367 88 | 0.385 71 | 0.416 06 | 0.427 31 |
新疆Xinjiang | 0.342 30 | 0.368 22 | 0.340 04 | 0.364 77 | 0.393 21 | 0.417 20 | 0.439 46 |
年份 Year | 农业高质量发展水平 Agricultural high-quality development level | 省级行政区 Provincial administrative region |
---|---|---|
2000 | 高水平High level | 北京Beijing、天津Tianjin |
中高水平Medium to high level | 河北Hebei | |
中低水平Low to medium level | 辽宁Liaoning、山东Shandong、江苏Jiangsu、上海Shanghai、浙江Zhejiang、河南Henan、青海Qinghai | |
低水平Low level | 黑龙江Heilongjiang、吉林Jilin、福建Fujian、广东Guangdong、山西Shanxi、安徽Anhui、江西Jiangxi、湖北Hubei、湖南Hunan、内蒙古Inner Mongolia、甘肃Gansu、宁夏Ningxia、陕西Shaanxi、四川Sichuan、重庆Chongqing、贵州Guizhou、广西Guangxi、云南Yunnan、新疆Xinjiang、西藏Tibet、海南Hainan | |
2006 | 高水平High level | 北京Beijing、天津Tianjin |
中高水平Medium to high level | 辽宁Liaoning、河北Hebei、江苏Jiangsu、上海Shanghai、浙江Zhejiang、西藏Tibet | |
中低水平Low to medium level | 黑龙江Heilongjiang、吉林Jilin、山东Shandong、广东Guangdong、山西Shanxi、河南Henan、安徽Anhui、江西Jiangxi、内蒙古Inner Mongolia、青海Qinghai | |
低水平Low level | 福建Fujian、湖北Hubei、湖南Hunan、甘肃Gansu、宁夏Ningxia、陕西Shaanxi、四川Sichuan、重庆Chongqing、贵州Guizhou、广西Guangxi、云南Yunnan、新疆Xinjiang、海南Hainan | |
年份 Year | 农业高质量发展水平 Agricultural high-quality development level | 省级行政区 Provincial administrative region |
2012 | 高水平High level | 吉林Jilin、辽宁Liaoning、河北Hebei、北京Beijing、天津Tianjin、山东Shandong、江苏Jiangsu、上海Shanghai、浙江Zhejiang、江西Jiangxi |
中高水平Medium to high level | 黑龙江Heilongjiang、福建Fujian、广东Guangdong、山西Shanxi、河南Henan、安徽Anhui、湖北Hubei、湖南Hunan、四川Sichuan、青海Qinghai、西藏Tibet、内蒙古Inner Mongolia | |
中低水平Low to medium level | 新疆Xinjiang、甘肃Gansu、宁夏Ningxia、陕西Shaanxi、重庆Chongqing、贵州Guizhou、云南Yunnan、广西Guangxi、海南Hainan | |
低水平Low level | — | |
2018 | 高水平High level | 黑龙江Heilongjiang、吉林Jilin、辽宁Liaoning、河北Hebei、北京Beijing、天津Tianjin、山东Shandong、江苏Jiangsu、上海Shanghai、浙江Zhejiang、福建Fujian、广东Guangdong、河南Henan、安徽Anhui、湖北Hubei、湖南Hunan、江西Jiangxi、青海Qinghai、西藏Tibet、海南Hainan |
中高水平Medium to high level | 山西Shanxi、新疆Xinjiang、内蒙古Inner Mongolia、宁夏Ningxia、陕西Shaanxi、重庆Chongqing、贵州Guizhou、广西Guangxi、四川Sichuan | |
中低水平Low to medium level | 甘肃Gansu、云南Yunnan | |
低水平Low level | — |
表3 2000—2018年我国农业高质量发展水平的空间差异
Table 3 Spatial differences of agricultural high-quality development level in China from 2000 to 2018
年份 Year | 农业高质量发展水平 Agricultural high-quality development level | 省级行政区 Provincial administrative region |
---|---|---|
2000 | 高水平High level | 北京Beijing、天津Tianjin |
中高水平Medium to high level | 河北Hebei | |
中低水平Low to medium level | 辽宁Liaoning、山东Shandong、江苏Jiangsu、上海Shanghai、浙江Zhejiang、河南Henan、青海Qinghai | |
低水平Low level | 黑龙江Heilongjiang、吉林Jilin、福建Fujian、广东Guangdong、山西Shanxi、安徽Anhui、江西Jiangxi、湖北Hubei、湖南Hunan、内蒙古Inner Mongolia、甘肃Gansu、宁夏Ningxia、陕西Shaanxi、四川Sichuan、重庆Chongqing、贵州Guizhou、广西Guangxi、云南Yunnan、新疆Xinjiang、西藏Tibet、海南Hainan | |
2006 | 高水平High level | 北京Beijing、天津Tianjin |
中高水平Medium to high level | 辽宁Liaoning、河北Hebei、江苏Jiangsu、上海Shanghai、浙江Zhejiang、西藏Tibet | |
中低水平Low to medium level | 黑龙江Heilongjiang、吉林Jilin、山东Shandong、广东Guangdong、山西Shanxi、河南Henan、安徽Anhui、江西Jiangxi、内蒙古Inner Mongolia、青海Qinghai | |
低水平Low level | 福建Fujian、湖北Hubei、湖南Hunan、甘肃Gansu、宁夏Ningxia、陕西Shaanxi、四川Sichuan、重庆Chongqing、贵州Guizhou、广西Guangxi、云南Yunnan、新疆Xinjiang、海南Hainan | |
年份 Year | 农业高质量发展水平 Agricultural high-quality development level | 省级行政区 Provincial administrative region |
2012 | 高水平High level | 吉林Jilin、辽宁Liaoning、河北Hebei、北京Beijing、天津Tianjin、山东Shandong、江苏Jiangsu、上海Shanghai、浙江Zhejiang、江西Jiangxi |
中高水平Medium to high level | 黑龙江Heilongjiang、福建Fujian、广东Guangdong、山西Shanxi、河南Henan、安徽Anhui、湖北Hubei、湖南Hunan、四川Sichuan、青海Qinghai、西藏Tibet、内蒙古Inner Mongolia | |
中低水平Low to medium level | 新疆Xinjiang、甘肃Gansu、宁夏Ningxia、陕西Shaanxi、重庆Chongqing、贵州Guizhou、云南Yunnan、广西Guangxi、海南Hainan | |
低水平Low level | — | |
2018 | 高水平High level | 黑龙江Heilongjiang、吉林Jilin、辽宁Liaoning、河北Hebei、北京Beijing、天津Tianjin、山东Shandong、江苏Jiangsu、上海Shanghai、浙江Zhejiang、福建Fujian、广东Guangdong、河南Henan、安徽Anhui、湖北Hubei、湖南Hunan、江西Jiangxi、青海Qinghai、西藏Tibet、海南Hainan |
中高水平Medium to high level | 山西Shanxi、新疆Xinjiang、内蒙古Inner Mongolia、宁夏Ningxia、陕西Shaanxi、重庆Chongqing、贵州Guizhou、广西Guangxi、四川Sichuan | |
中低水平Low to medium level | 甘肃Gansu、云南Yunnan | |
低水平Low level | — |
年份Year | I | Z | P | 年份Year | I | Z | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 0.611 | 5.581 | <0.001 | 2008 | 0.508 | 7.786 | <0.001 |
2017 | 0.535 | 4.939 | <0.001 | 2007 | 0.509 | 4.787 | <0.001 |
2016 | 0.579 | 5.340 | <0.001 | 2006 | 0.552 | 5.222 | <0.001 |
2015 | 0.577 | 5.342 | <0.001 | 2005 | 0.564 | 5.373 | <0.001 |
2014 | 0.601 | 5.519 | <0.001 | 2004 | 0.567 | 5.397 | <0.001 |
2013 | 0.604 | 5.549 | <0.001 | 2003 | 0.552 | 5.381 | <0.001 |
2012 | 0.597 | 5.501 | <0.001 | 2002 | 0.573 | 5.653 | <0.001 |
2011 | 0.570 | 5.262 | <0.001 | 2001 | 0.568 | 5.516 | <0.001 |
2010 | 0.562 | 5.236 | <0.001 | 2000 | 0.613 | 5.995 | <0.001 |
2009 | 0.559 | 5.217 | <0.001 |
表4 2000—2018年我国农业高质量发展水平的全局莫兰指数检验结果
Table 4 Global Moran index test results of agricultural high-quality development level in China form 2000 to 2018
年份Year | I | Z | P | 年份Year | I | Z | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 0.611 | 5.581 | <0.001 | 2008 | 0.508 | 7.786 | <0.001 |
2017 | 0.535 | 4.939 | <0.001 | 2007 | 0.509 | 4.787 | <0.001 |
2016 | 0.579 | 5.340 | <0.001 | 2006 | 0.552 | 5.222 | <0.001 |
2015 | 0.577 | 5.342 | <0.001 | 2005 | 0.564 | 5.373 | <0.001 |
2014 | 0.601 | 5.519 | <0.001 | 2004 | 0.567 | 5.397 | <0.001 |
2013 | 0.604 | 5.549 | <0.001 | 2003 | 0.552 | 5.381 | <0.001 |
2012 | 0.597 | 5.501 | <0.001 | 2002 | 0.573 | 5.653 | <0.001 |
2011 | 0.570 | 5.262 | <0.001 | 2001 | 0.568 | 5.516 | <0.001 |
2010 | 0.562 | 5.236 | <0.001 | 2000 | 0.613 | 5.995 | <0.001 |
2009 | 0.559 | 5.217 | <0.001 |
地区Region | 2000 | 2003 | 2006 | 2009 | 2012 | 2015 | 2018 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
全国Nation wide | 0.202 83 | 0.206 19 | 0.269 48 | 0.354 71 | 0.471 94 | 0.490 62 | 0.490 83 |
北京Beijing | 0.477 61 | 0.636 61 | 0.688 27 | 0.561 25 | 0.574 23 | 0.583 79 | 0.607 67 |
天津Tianjin | 0.396 52 | 0.453 83 | 0.529 79 | 0.576 75 | 0.677 14 | 0.625 03 | 0.562 33 |
河北Hebei | 0.205 06 | 0.262 82 | 0.327 69 | 0.418 38 | 0.539 48 | 0.548 72 | 0.558 21 |
山西Shanxi | 0.022 14 | 0.003 96 | 0.147 30 | 0.290 61 | 0.438 28 | 0.486 66 | 0.439 73 |
内蒙古Inner Mongolia | 0.076 69 | 0.033 79 | 0.045 49 | 0.223 11 | 0.392 93 | 0.424 46 | 0.455 56 |
辽宁Liaoning | 0.185 66 | 0.286 32 | 0.470 67 | 0.642 22 | 0.631 79 | 0.608 94 | 0.545 32 |
吉林Jilin | 0.027 62 | 0.001 33 | 0.160 59 | 0.345 18 | 0.483 41 | 0.484 09 | 0.487 51 |
黑龙江Heilongjiang | 0.043 29 | 0.020 08 | 0.118 03 | 0.184 76 | 0.297 41 | 0.247 25 | 0.273 68 |
上海Shanghai | 0.512 75 | 0.631 22 | 0.623 13 | 0.519 17 | 0.707 87 | 0.663 71 | 0.679 65 |
江苏Jiangsu | 0.262 98 | 0.374 75 | 0.498 43 | 0.671 20 | 0.645 59 | 0.621 24 | 0.602 92 |
浙江Zhejiang | 0.238 49 | 0.288 70 | 0.419 33 | 0.573 81 | 0.621 12 | 0.561 16 | 0.524 49 |
安徽Anhui | 0.071 78 | 0.050 35 | 0.210 91 | 0.376 78 | 0.527 65 | 0.519 68 | 0.529 78 |
福建Fujian | 0.334 38 | 0.364 55 | 0.448 79 | 0.650 62 | 0.675 97 | 0.619 71 | 0.583 70 |
江西Jiangxi | 0.065 31 | 0.039 95 | 0.272 75 | 0.448 33 | 0.548 81 | 0.568 57 | 0.532 09 |
山东Shandong | 0.287 72 | 0.329 15 | 0.484 94 | 0.621 86 | 0.686 69 | 0.671 87 | 0.696 53 |
河南Henan | 0.188 63 | 0.163 20 | 0.321 83 | 0.457 31 | 0.603 29 | 0.614 31 | 0.618 91 |
湖北Hubei | 0.093 04 | 0.123 06 | 0.254 40 | 0.470 17 | 0.648 36 | 0.620 15 | 0.629 36 |
湖南Hunan | 0.083 88 | 0.112 37 | 0.245 63 | 0.432 74 | 0.599 79 | 0.624 08 | 0.627 86 |
广东Guangdong | 0.306 23 | 0.367 63 | 0.503 73 | 0.618 91 | 0.678 97 | 0.641 94 | 0.611 48 |
广西Guangxi | 0.032 19 | 0.026 84 | 0.144 84 | 0.304 84 | 0.441 99 | 0.531 44 | 0.533 33 |
海南Hainan | 0.152 22 | 0.212 18 | 0.388 09 | 0.541 83 | 0.504 52 | 0.430 60 | 0.419 58 |
重庆Chongqing | 0.077 29 | 0.103 73 | 0.062 47 | 0.165 55 | 0.339 70 | 0.406 62 | 0.426 64 |
四川Sichuan | 0.098 10 | 0.031 87 | 0.105 24 | 0.241 23 | 0.332 26 | 0.371 66 | 0.362 40 |
贵州Guizhou | 0.227 97 | 0.283 79 | 0.299 04 | 0.045 71 | 0.165 04 | 0.291 53 | 0.323 98 |
云南Yunnan | 0.287 66 | 0.255 96 | 0.132 12 | 0.035 73 | 0.241 97 | 0.311 41 | 0.348 68 |
西藏Tibet | 0.549 01 | 0.298 52 | 0.009 31 | 0.089 66 | 0.027 27 | 0.092 25 | 0.127 53 |
陕西Shaanxi | 0.207 64 | 0.189 65 | 0.086 16 | 0.140 69 | 0.473 28 | 0.550 30 | 0.580 55 |
甘肃Gansu | 0.318 33 | 0.285 74 | 0.175 00 | 0.112 51 | 0.312 53 | 0.420 96 | 0.370 13 |
青海Qinghai | 0.088 36 | 0.018 31 | 0.007 42 | 0.035 41 | 0.260 13 | 0.322 14 | 0.350 83 |
宁夏Ningxia | 0.127 17 | 0.045 17 | 0.031 66 | 0.111 62 | 0.276 21 | 0.362 70 | 0.367 03 |
新疆Xinjiang | 0.241 85 | 0.096 38 | 0.140 90 | 0.088 04 | 0.276 55 | 0.382 24 | 0.438 40 |
表5 2000—2018年我国农业高质量发展各构成要素的协调度
Table 5 Coordination degree among elements of agricultural high-quality development in China from 2000 to 2018
地区Region | 2000 | 2003 | 2006 | 2009 | 2012 | 2015 | 2018 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
全国Nation wide | 0.202 83 | 0.206 19 | 0.269 48 | 0.354 71 | 0.471 94 | 0.490 62 | 0.490 83 |
北京Beijing | 0.477 61 | 0.636 61 | 0.688 27 | 0.561 25 | 0.574 23 | 0.583 79 | 0.607 67 |
天津Tianjin | 0.396 52 | 0.453 83 | 0.529 79 | 0.576 75 | 0.677 14 | 0.625 03 | 0.562 33 |
河北Hebei | 0.205 06 | 0.262 82 | 0.327 69 | 0.418 38 | 0.539 48 | 0.548 72 | 0.558 21 |
山西Shanxi | 0.022 14 | 0.003 96 | 0.147 30 | 0.290 61 | 0.438 28 | 0.486 66 | 0.439 73 |
内蒙古Inner Mongolia | 0.076 69 | 0.033 79 | 0.045 49 | 0.223 11 | 0.392 93 | 0.424 46 | 0.455 56 |
辽宁Liaoning | 0.185 66 | 0.286 32 | 0.470 67 | 0.642 22 | 0.631 79 | 0.608 94 | 0.545 32 |
吉林Jilin | 0.027 62 | 0.001 33 | 0.160 59 | 0.345 18 | 0.483 41 | 0.484 09 | 0.487 51 |
黑龙江Heilongjiang | 0.043 29 | 0.020 08 | 0.118 03 | 0.184 76 | 0.297 41 | 0.247 25 | 0.273 68 |
上海Shanghai | 0.512 75 | 0.631 22 | 0.623 13 | 0.519 17 | 0.707 87 | 0.663 71 | 0.679 65 |
江苏Jiangsu | 0.262 98 | 0.374 75 | 0.498 43 | 0.671 20 | 0.645 59 | 0.621 24 | 0.602 92 |
浙江Zhejiang | 0.238 49 | 0.288 70 | 0.419 33 | 0.573 81 | 0.621 12 | 0.561 16 | 0.524 49 |
安徽Anhui | 0.071 78 | 0.050 35 | 0.210 91 | 0.376 78 | 0.527 65 | 0.519 68 | 0.529 78 |
福建Fujian | 0.334 38 | 0.364 55 | 0.448 79 | 0.650 62 | 0.675 97 | 0.619 71 | 0.583 70 |
江西Jiangxi | 0.065 31 | 0.039 95 | 0.272 75 | 0.448 33 | 0.548 81 | 0.568 57 | 0.532 09 |
山东Shandong | 0.287 72 | 0.329 15 | 0.484 94 | 0.621 86 | 0.686 69 | 0.671 87 | 0.696 53 |
河南Henan | 0.188 63 | 0.163 20 | 0.321 83 | 0.457 31 | 0.603 29 | 0.614 31 | 0.618 91 |
湖北Hubei | 0.093 04 | 0.123 06 | 0.254 40 | 0.470 17 | 0.648 36 | 0.620 15 | 0.629 36 |
湖南Hunan | 0.083 88 | 0.112 37 | 0.245 63 | 0.432 74 | 0.599 79 | 0.624 08 | 0.627 86 |
广东Guangdong | 0.306 23 | 0.367 63 | 0.503 73 | 0.618 91 | 0.678 97 | 0.641 94 | 0.611 48 |
广西Guangxi | 0.032 19 | 0.026 84 | 0.144 84 | 0.304 84 | 0.441 99 | 0.531 44 | 0.533 33 |
海南Hainan | 0.152 22 | 0.212 18 | 0.388 09 | 0.541 83 | 0.504 52 | 0.430 60 | 0.419 58 |
重庆Chongqing | 0.077 29 | 0.103 73 | 0.062 47 | 0.165 55 | 0.339 70 | 0.406 62 | 0.426 64 |
四川Sichuan | 0.098 10 | 0.031 87 | 0.105 24 | 0.241 23 | 0.332 26 | 0.371 66 | 0.362 40 |
贵州Guizhou | 0.227 97 | 0.283 79 | 0.299 04 | 0.045 71 | 0.165 04 | 0.291 53 | 0.323 98 |
云南Yunnan | 0.287 66 | 0.255 96 | 0.132 12 | 0.035 73 | 0.241 97 | 0.311 41 | 0.348 68 |
西藏Tibet | 0.549 01 | 0.298 52 | 0.009 31 | 0.089 66 | 0.027 27 | 0.092 25 | 0.127 53 |
陕西Shaanxi | 0.207 64 | 0.189 65 | 0.086 16 | 0.140 69 | 0.473 28 | 0.550 30 | 0.580 55 |
甘肃Gansu | 0.318 33 | 0.285 74 | 0.175 00 | 0.112 51 | 0.312 53 | 0.420 96 | 0.370 13 |
青海Qinghai | 0.088 36 | 0.018 31 | 0.007 42 | 0.035 41 | 0.260 13 | 0.322 14 | 0.350 83 |
宁夏Ningxia | 0.127 17 | 0.045 17 | 0.031 66 | 0.111 62 | 0.276 21 | 0.362 70 | 0.367 03 |
新疆Xinjiang | 0.241 85 | 0.096 38 | 0.140 90 | 0.088 04 | 0.276 55 | 0.382 24 | 0.438 40 |
年份 Year | 协调发展水平 Coordination level | 省级行政区 Provincial administrative region |
---|---|---|
2000 | 高水平High level | — |
中高水平Medium to high level | 上海Shanghai、西藏Tibet | |
中低水平Low to medium level | 北京Beijing、天津Tianjin、山东Shandong、江苏Jiangsu、福建Fujian、广东Guangdong、甘肃Gansu、云南Yunnan | |
低水平Low level | 黑龙江Heilongjiang、吉林Jilin、辽宁Liaoning、河北Hebei、浙江Zhejiang、山西Shanxi、河南Henan、安徽Anhui、湖北Hubei、湖南Hunan、江西Jiangxi、内蒙古Inner Mongolia、宁夏Ningxia、陕西Shaanxi、四川Sichuan、重庆Chongqing、贵州Guizhou、广西Guangxi、青海Qinghai、新疆Xinjiang、海南Hainan | |
2006 | 高水平High level | — |
中高水平Medium to high level | 北京Beijing、天津Tianjin、上海Shanghai、广东Guangdong | |
中低水平Low to medium level | 辽宁Liaoning、河北Hebei、山东Shandong、江苏Jiangsu、浙江Zhejiang、福建Fujian、河南Henan、湖北Hubei、江西Jiangxi、贵州Guizhou、海南Hainan | |
低水平Low level | 黑龙江Heilongjiang、吉林Jilin、山西Shanxi、安徽Anhui、湖南Hunan、内蒙古Inner Mongolia、甘肃Gansu、宁夏Ningxia、陕西Shaanxi、四川Sichuan、重庆Chongqing、广西Guangxi、云南Yunnan、青海Qinghai、新疆Xinjiang、西藏Tibet | |
年份 Year | 协调发展水平 Coordination level | 省级行政区 Provincial administrative region |
2012 | 高水平High level | — |
中高水平Medium to high level | 辽宁Liaoning、河北Hebei、北京Beijing、天津Tianjin、山东Shandong、江苏Jiangsu、上海Shanghai、浙江Zhejiang、福建Fujian、广东Guangdong、河南Henan、湖北Hubei、湖南Hunan、安徽Anhui、江西Jiangxi、海南Hainan | |
中低水平Low to medium level | 黑龙江Heilongjiang、吉林Jilin、山西Shanxi、内蒙古Inner Mongolia、甘肃Gansu、宁夏Ningxia、陕西Shaanxi、四川Sichuan、重庆Chongqing、广西Guangxi、青海Qinghai、新疆Xinjiang | |
低水平Low level | 云南Yunnan、贵州Guizhou、西藏Tibet | |
2018 | 高水平High level | — |
中高水平Medium to high level | 辽宁Liaoning、河北Hebei、北京Beijing、天津Tianjin、山东Shandong、江苏Jiangsu、上海Shanghai、浙江Zhejiang、福建Fujian、广东Guangdong、河南Henan、湖北Hubei、湖南Hunan、安徽Anhui、江西Jiangxi、陕西Shaanxi、广西Guangxi | |
中低水平Low to medium level | 黑龙江Heilongjiang、吉林Jilin、山西Shanxi、内蒙古Inner Mongolia、甘肃Gansu、宁夏Ningxia、四川Sichuan、重庆Chongqing、贵州Guizhou、云南Yunnan、青海Qinghai、新疆Xinjiang、海南Hainan | |
低水平Low level | 西藏Tibet |
表6 2000—2018年我国农业高质量发展各构成要素的协调度的空间差异
Table 6 Spatial differences of coordination degree among elements of agricultural high-quality development in China from 2000 to 2018
年份 Year | 协调发展水平 Coordination level | 省级行政区 Provincial administrative region |
---|---|---|
2000 | 高水平High level | — |
中高水平Medium to high level | 上海Shanghai、西藏Tibet | |
中低水平Low to medium level | 北京Beijing、天津Tianjin、山东Shandong、江苏Jiangsu、福建Fujian、广东Guangdong、甘肃Gansu、云南Yunnan | |
低水平Low level | 黑龙江Heilongjiang、吉林Jilin、辽宁Liaoning、河北Hebei、浙江Zhejiang、山西Shanxi、河南Henan、安徽Anhui、湖北Hubei、湖南Hunan、江西Jiangxi、内蒙古Inner Mongolia、宁夏Ningxia、陕西Shaanxi、四川Sichuan、重庆Chongqing、贵州Guizhou、广西Guangxi、青海Qinghai、新疆Xinjiang、海南Hainan | |
2006 | 高水平High level | — |
中高水平Medium to high level | 北京Beijing、天津Tianjin、上海Shanghai、广东Guangdong | |
中低水平Low to medium level | 辽宁Liaoning、河北Hebei、山东Shandong、江苏Jiangsu、浙江Zhejiang、福建Fujian、河南Henan、湖北Hubei、江西Jiangxi、贵州Guizhou、海南Hainan | |
低水平Low level | 黑龙江Heilongjiang、吉林Jilin、山西Shanxi、安徽Anhui、湖南Hunan、内蒙古Inner Mongolia、甘肃Gansu、宁夏Ningxia、陕西Shaanxi、四川Sichuan、重庆Chongqing、广西Guangxi、云南Yunnan、青海Qinghai、新疆Xinjiang、西藏Tibet | |
年份 Year | 协调发展水平 Coordination level | 省级行政区 Provincial administrative region |
2012 | 高水平High level | — |
中高水平Medium to high level | 辽宁Liaoning、河北Hebei、北京Beijing、天津Tianjin、山东Shandong、江苏Jiangsu、上海Shanghai、浙江Zhejiang、福建Fujian、广东Guangdong、河南Henan、湖北Hubei、湖南Hunan、安徽Anhui、江西Jiangxi、海南Hainan | |
中低水平Low to medium level | 黑龙江Heilongjiang、吉林Jilin、山西Shanxi、内蒙古Inner Mongolia、甘肃Gansu、宁夏Ningxia、陕西Shaanxi、四川Sichuan、重庆Chongqing、广西Guangxi、青海Qinghai、新疆Xinjiang | |
低水平Low level | 云南Yunnan、贵州Guizhou、西藏Tibet | |
2018 | 高水平High level | — |
中高水平Medium to high level | 辽宁Liaoning、河北Hebei、北京Beijing、天津Tianjin、山东Shandong、江苏Jiangsu、上海Shanghai、浙江Zhejiang、福建Fujian、广东Guangdong、河南Henan、湖北Hubei、湖南Hunan、安徽Anhui、江西Jiangxi、陕西Shaanxi、广西Guangxi | |
中低水平Low to medium level | 黑龙江Heilongjiang、吉林Jilin、山西Shanxi、内蒙古Inner Mongolia、甘肃Gansu、宁夏Ningxia、四川Sichuan、重庆Chongqing、贵州Guizhou、云南Yunnan、青海Qinghai、新疆Xinjiang、海南Hainan | |
低水平Low level | 西藏Tibet |
[1] | 黄季焜. 中国农业的过去和未来[J]. 管理世界, 2004(3):95-104. |
HUANG J K. The past and future of Chinese agriculture[J]. Management World, 2004(3):95-104. (in Chinese) | |
[2] | 夏英, 丁声俊. 论新时代质量兴农绿色发展[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2018(9):5-13. |
XIA Y, DING S J. On the quality of agriculture and green development in the new era[J]. Price: Theory & Practice, 2018(9):5-13. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 郝一帆, 王征兵. 生产性服务业集聚有助于农业高质量增长吗?[J]. 人文杂志, 2019(5):54-61. |
HAO Y F, WANG Z B. Does agglomeration of producer services contribute to high-quality agricultural growth?[J]. The Journal of Humanities, 2019(5):54-61. (in Chinese) | |
[4] | 李国祥. 论中国农业发展动能转换[J]. 中国农村经济, 2017(7):2-14. |
LI G X. On transformation of ways in driving China’s agricultural development[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2017(7):2-14.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 钟钰. 向高质量发展阶段迈进的农业发展导向[J]. 中州学刊, 2018(5):40-44. |
ZHONG Y. Agricultural development orientation towards high quality stage[J]. Academic Journal of Zhongzhou, 2018(5):40-44.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 丁声俊. 站在新时代高度认识农业粮食高质量发展[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2018(1):5-9. |
DING S J. A recognition for high-quality development of grain produce at the height of a new era[J]. Price: Theory & Practice, 2018(1):5-9.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 赖晓敏, 张俊飚, 何可. 政府监管质量对农业经济增长的影响研究: 基于FAO 全球45个国家的面板数据[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019(6):42-49. |
LAI X M, ZHANG J B, HE K. Research on the influence of government regulation on agricultural economic growth: an empirical study based on FAO panel data from 45 countries[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2019(6):42-49.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 张东玲. 新型城镇化质量对农业经济增长的空间溢出效应分析: 基于山东省17地市的经验数据[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(4):157-167. |
ZHANG D L. Analysis of the spatial spillover effect of new urbanization quality on agricultural economic growth: based on empirical data from 17 cities in Shandong Province[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2019(4):157-167.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 刘岳平, 钟世川. 技术进步方向、资本-劳动替代弹性对中国农业经济增长的影响[J]. 财经论丛, 2016(9):3-9. |
LIU Y P, ZHONG S C. The impact of the direction of technological progress, the substitution elasticity between capital and labor on the growth of agricultural economics[J]. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, 2016(9):3-9.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 向敬伟, 李江风. 贫困山区耕地利用转型对农业经济增长质量的影响[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2018,28(1):71-81. |
XIANG J W, LI J F. Influence of cultivated land use transition on quality of agricultural economic growth in poor mountainous areas[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2018,28(1):71-81.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 辛岭, 安晓宁. 我国农业高质量发展评价体系构建与测度分析[J]. 经济纵横, 2019(5):109-118. |
XIN L, AN X N. Construction and empirical analysis of agricultural high-quality development evaluation system in China[J]. Economic Review Journal, 2019(5):109-118.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 赵丹丹, 刘春明, 鲍丙飞, 等. 农业可持续发展能力评价与子系统协调度分析: 以我国粮食主产区为例[J]. 经济地理, 2018,38(4):157-163. |
ZHAO D D, LIU C M, BAO B F, et al. Agricultural sustainable development ability evaluation and subsystem coordination degree analysis: take the major grain-producing areas of China as an example[J]. Economic Geography, 2018,38(4):157-163.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 矫健, 聂雁蓉, 张仙梅, 等. 加快推进都市农业高质量发展对策研究: 基于成都市对标评价[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2020,41(7):201-206. |
JIAO J, NIE Y R, ZHANG X M, et al. Research on countermeasures of accelerating the high quality development of urban agriculture: based on Chengdu bidding evaluation[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2020,41(7):201-206.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 刘涛, 李继霞, 霍静娟. 中国农业高质量发展的时空格局与影响因素[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2020,34(10):1-8. |
LIU T, LI J X, HUO J J. Spatial-temporal pattern and influencing factors of high-quality agricultural development in China[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2020,34(10):1-8.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 农业农村部, 国家发展改革委, 科技部, 等. 国家质量兴农战略规划(2018—2022年)[EB/OL]. (2019-02-28) [2020-10-09]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-02/28/content_5369186.htm. |
[16] | 黄修杰, 蔡勋, 储霞玲, 等. 我国农业高质量发展评价指标体系构建与评估[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2020,41(4):124-133. |
HUANG X J, CAI X, CHU X L, et al. Index construction and evaluation of high-quality development of agriculture in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2020,41(4):124-133.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 韩长赋. 大力推进质量兴农绿色兴农加快实现农业高质量发展[J]. 甘肃农业, 2018(5):6-10. |
HAN C F. Vigorously promote the development of quality agriculture and green agriculture and accelerate the realization of high-quality development of agriculture[J]. Gansu Agriculture, 2018(5):6-10. (in Chinese) | |
[18] | 夏显力, 陈哲, 张慧利, 等. 农业高质量发展:数字赋能与实现路径[J]. 中国农村经济, 2019(12):2-15. |
XIA X L, CHEN Z, ZHANG H L, et al. Agricultural high-quality development: digital empowerment and implementation path[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2019(12):2-15.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 张露, 罗必良. 中国农业的高质量发展: 本质规定与策略选择[J]. 天津社会科学, 2020,11(5):84-92. |
ZHANG L, LUO B L. Pursuing high quality development of agriculture in China: essential regulations and strategy options[J]. Tianjin Social Sciences, 2020,11(5):84-92.(in Chinese) | |
[20] | 谢艳乐, 祁春节. 农业高质量发展与乡村振兴联动的机理及对策[J]. 中州学刊, 2020(2):33-37. |
XIE Y L, QI C J. Mechanism and countermeasures on the linkage between high-quality development of agriculture and rural revitalization[J]. Academic Journal of Zhongzhou, 2020(2):33-37.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 黄敏, 任栋. 以人民为中心的高质量发展指标体系构建与测算[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2019,34(10):36-42. |
HUANG M, REN D. Constructing and calculating of people-centered high-quality development index system[J]. Statistics & Information Forum, 2019,34(10):36-42.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] |
叶信岳, 李晶晶, 程叶青. 浙江省经济差异时空动态的多尺度与多机制分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014,33(9):1177-1186.
DOI URL |
YE X Y, LI J J, CHENG Y Q. Multi-scale and multi-mechanism analysis of the spatial pattern and temporal change of regional economic development disparities in Zhejiang Province[J]. Progress in Geography, 2014,33(9):1177-1186.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 张发明, 丁峰, 王坪. 中国粮食主产区农业高质量发展水平评价与时空演变[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(1): 150-160. |
[2] | 张丽萍;刘学录*;马晓婧. 基于协调度模型的甘肃省开发区土地集约利用评价研究[J]. , 2012, 24(5): 0-897. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||