浙江农业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 170-182.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.01.20

• 农业经济与发展 • 上一篇    

中国农业高质量发展的时空特征与协调度

董艳敏a,b(), 严奉宪a,b,*()   

  1. a. 经济管理学院 华中农业大学, 湖北 武汉 430070
    b. 绿色经济研究中心 华中农业大学, 湖北 武汉 430070
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-09 出版日期:2021-01-25 发布日期:2021-01-25
  • 通讯作者: 严奉宪
  • 作者简介:*严奉宪,E-mail:fx_yan@mail.hzau.edu.cn
    董艳敏(1993—),女,河南开封人,博士研究生,研究方向为农业经济与区域发展。E-mail:2535359991@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(71874065)

Spatial-temporal characteristics and coordination of agricultural high-quality development in China

DONG Yanmina,b(), YAN Fengxiana,b,*()   

  1. a. College of Economics & Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
    b. Green Economy Research Center, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
  • Received:2020-10-09 Online:2021-01-25 Published:2021-01-25
  • Contact: YAN Fengxian

摘要:

从生产效率、产业效益、绿色化生产、劳动者素质和农民收入5个要素层面选取14个指标构建农业高质量发展评价体系,用熵值法、莫兰指数和协调度方法测度中国(不含港、澳、台)31个省级行政区2000—2018年的农业高质量发展水平、空间相关性和协调度。结果表明:(1)2000—2018年中国农业高质量发展水平逐步上升,由2000年的0.355 39上升至2018年的0.482 40,年均增长率为1.71%。(2)中国农业高质量发展水平地区差异较大,具有集聚连片的特点,从西部地区到东部沿海,农业高质量发展水平逐步提高。相邻省级行政区的农业高质量发展水平彼此相互影响,空间相邻的省级行政区的农业高质量发展水平处于“同高同低”状态。(3)2000—2018年中国农业高质量发展各构成要素的协调度趋好,但还有待加强。(4)各省级行政区的农业高质量发展水平与当地农业高质量发展各构成要素的协调度具有一致性,即农业高质量发展水平较高的地区,其各构成要素的协调度也相对较高。

关键词: 农业高质量发展, 空间相关性, 协调度, 评价体系

Abstract:

From the 5 elements of production efficiency, industry benefits, green production, quality of labors, and the farmers’income, 14 indexes were selected to construct the evaluation system of agricultural high-quality development, and the level, spatial correlation and coordination degree among elements of agricultural high-quality development in 2000-2018 in China (Hongkong, Macau and Taiwan not included) were analyzed by entropy method, Moran index, and coordination degree method. The results showed as follows: (1) From 2000 to 2018, the agricultural high-quality development level in China has gradually increased from 0.355 39 in 2000 to 0.482 40 in 2018, with an average annual growth rate of 1.71%. (2) There are large regional differences in the agricultural high-quality development level in China, and it has the characteristics of clustering. From the western region to the eastern coast, the agricultural high-quality development level has gradually increased. The agricultural high-quality development level in the adjacent provincial administrative regions affects mutually, and present the state of “the same high and the same low”. (3) The coordination degree among elements of agricultural high-quality development in China has improved from 2000 to 2018, but it still needs to be strengthened. (4) China’s agricultural high-quality development level is consistent with the coordination dgeree among elements of agricultural high-quality development. In other words, the regions with high level of agricultural high-quality development, also have relatively high coordination degree among elements of agricultural high-quality development.

Key words: agricultural high-quality development, spatial correlation, coordination degree, evaluation system

中图分类号: