浙江农业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 193-202.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.02.02
王潭刚1(), 孙婷2, 王冀川2,*(), 李慧琴1, 高振2, 石元强2
收稿日期:
2020-07-17
出版日期:
2021-02-25
发布日期:
2021-02-25
通讯作者:
王冀川
作者简介:
王冀川,E-mail: wjcwzy@126.com基金资助:
WANG Tangang1(), SUN Ting2, WANG Jichuan2,*(), LI Huiqin1, GAO Zhen2, SHI Yuanqiang2
Received:
2020-07-17
Online:
2021-02-25
Published:
2021-02-25
Contact:
WANG Jichuan
摘要:
以新冬22(少穗型)和邯郸5316(多穗型)为供试材料,采用裂区田间试验设计,主区为3个播期:9月23日(B1)、10月4日(B2)和10月15日(B3);副区为4个播种密度:315万株·hm-2(M1)、510万株·hm-2(M2)、705万株·hm-2(M3)、900万株·hm-2(M4),研究不同播期和密度对滴灌冬小麦群体动态和抗倒特性的影响。结果表明:(1)滴灌冬小麦生育期随播期推迟而缩短,B3处理的新冬22和邯郸5316的生育期较B2处理缩短11 d,较B1处理缩短22 d;密度对生育进程影响较小。(2)群体大小和叶面积指数(LAI)随密度增加而增加,随播期推迟而减小;晚播群体在生育后期总茎数有追赶正常播期处理的趋势;同一密度下B2处理和同一播期下M2或M3处理的群体大小和叶面积动态随生育进程变化最小,表现出较好的叶片调节功能。(3)随播种密度增加,滴灌冬小麦基部节间和重心高度增加,基部直径、机械强度和抗倒指数下降;随播期延迟,茎秆基部节间变短,重心高度下降,直径增大,机械强度和抗倒指数增加;密度对茎秆性状的影响大于播期;在实际生产中,充分发挥密度和播期的互作效应,适当增加晚播处理的密度,能优化个体生长,保证高产。(4)B2处理的平均产量较B1、B3处理分别提高8.09%~17.52%和16.01%~21.07%,新冬22和邯郸5316分别在B2M3和B2M2处理中产量最高,分别达8 541.04 kg·hm-2和9 218.08 kg·hm-2。(5)从群个体生长的角度上看,新冬22对密度反应更敏感,邯郸5316对播期反应更敏感;说明生产中少穗型品种应注重合理密度前提下调节播期,而多穗型品种应注重适当播期前提下调节密度,以充分发挥品种的增产潜力。
中图分类号:
王潭刚, 孙婷, 王冀川, 李慧琴, 高振, 石元强. 播期和密度对滴灌冬小麦群体结构与抗倒特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(2): 193-202.
WANG Tangang, SUN Ting, WANG Jichuan, LI Huiqin, GAO Zhen, SHI Yuanqiang. Effects of sowing date and density on population structure and lodging resistance of winter wheat under drip irrigation[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(2): 193-202.
品种 Variety | 播期 Sowing date | 密度 Seeding density | 生育进程Growing process(Month-Date) | 生育期 Growth stage/d | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
播种期 Sowing date | 出苗期 Emergence stage | 拔节期 Jointing stage | 孕穗期 Booting stage | 抽穗期 Heading date | 扬花期 Flowering stage | 灌浆期 Filling stage | 蜡熟期 Dough stage | ||||
新冬22 | B1 | M1 | 09-23 | 09-29 | 03-31 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-07 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 269 |
Xindong 22 | M2 | 09-23 | 09-29 | 03-31 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-07 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 269 | |
M3 | 09-23 | 09-29 | 03-31 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-07 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 269 | ||
M4 | 09-23 | 09-29 | 03-31 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-07 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 269 | ||
B2 | M1 | 10-04 | 10-11 | 04-02 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-07 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 258 | |
M2 | 10-04 | 10-11 | 04-02 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-07 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 258 | ||
M3 | 10-04 | 10-11 | 04-02 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-09 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 258 | ||
M4 | 10-04 | 10-11 | 04-02 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-09 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 258 | ||
B3 | M1 | 10-15 | 10-25 | 04-09 | 04-26 | 05-06 | 05-14 | 05-23 | 06-19 | 247 | |
M2 | 10-15 | 10-25 | 04-09 | 04-26 | 05-06 | 05-14 | 05-23 | 06-19 | 247 | ||
M3 | 10-15 | 10-25 | 04-09 | 04-26 | 05-06 | 05-14 | 05-23 | 06-19 | 247 | ||
M4 | 10-15 | 10-25 | 04-09 | 04-26 | 05-06 | 05-14 | 05-23 | 06-19 | 247 | ||
邯郸5316 | B1 | M1 | 09-23 | 09-29 | 03-31 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-08 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 269 |
Handan 5316 | M2 | 09-23 | 09-29 | 03-31 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-08 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 269 | |
M3 | 09-23 | 09-29 | 03-31 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-08 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 269 | ||
M4 | 09-23 | 09-29 | 03-31 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-08 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 269 | ||
B2 | M1 | 10-04 | 10-11 | 04-02 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-08 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 258 | |
M2 | 10-04 | 10-11 | 04-02 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-08 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 258 | ||
M3 | 10-04 | 10-11 | 04-02 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-10 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 258 | ||
M4 | 10-04 | 10-11 | 04-02 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-10 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 258 | ||
B3 | M1 | 10-15 | 10-25 | 04-09 | 04-26 | 05-06 | 05-14 | 05-23 | 06-19 | 247 | |
M2 | 10-15 | 10-25 | 04-09 | 04-26 | 05-06 | 05-14 | 05-23 | 06-19 | 247 | ||
M3 | 10-15 | 10-25 | 04-09 | 04-26 | 05-06 | 05-14 | 05-23 | 06-19 | 247 | ||
M4 | 10-15 | 10-25 | 04-09 | 04-26 | 05-06 | 05-14 | 05-23 | 06-19 | 247 |
表1 播期和密度对滴灌冬小麦生育进程的影响
Table 1 Effects of sowing date and density on growing process of winter wheat under drip irrigation
品种 Variety | 播期 Sowing date | 密度 Seeding density | 生育进程Growing process(Month-Date) | 生育期 Growth stage/d | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
播种期 Sowing date | 出苗期 Emergence stage | 拔节期 Jointing stage | 孕穗期 Booting stage | 抽穗期 Heading date | 扬花期 Flowering stage | 灌浆期 Filling stage | 蜡熟期 Dough stage | ||||
新冬22 | B1 | M1 | 09-23 | 09-29 | 03-31 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-07 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 269 |
Xindong 22 | M2 | 09-23 | 09-29 | 03-31 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-07 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 269 | |
M3 | 09-23 | 09-29 | 03-31 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-07 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 269 | ||
M4 | 09-23 | 09-29 | 03-31 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-07 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 269 | ||
B2 | M1 | 10-04 | 10-11 | 04-02 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-07 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 258 | |
M2 | 10-04 | 10-11 | 04-02 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-07 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 258 | ||
M3 | 10-04 | 10-11 | 04-02 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-09 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 258 | ||
M4 | 10-04 | 10-11 | 04-02 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-09 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 258 | ||
B3 | M1 | 10-15 | 10-25 | 04-09 | 04-26 | 05-06 | 05-14 | 05-23 | 06-19 | 247 | |
M2 | 10-15 | 10-25 | 04-09 | 04-26 | 05-06 | 05-14 | 05-23 | 06-19 | 247 | ||
M3 | 10-15 | 10-25 | 04-09 | 04-26 | 05-06 | 05-14 | 05-23 | 06-19 | 247 | ||
M4 | 10-15 | 10-25 | 04-09 | 04-26 | 05-06 | 05-14 | 05-23 | 06-19 | 247 | ||
邯郸5316 | B1 | M1 | 09-23 | 09-29 | 03-31 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-08 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 269 |
Handan 5316 | M2 | 09-23 | 09-29 | 03-31 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-08 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 269 | |
M3 | 09-23 | 09-29 | 03-31 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-08 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 269 | ||
M4 | 09-23 | 09-29 | 03-31 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-08 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 269 | ||
B2 | M1 | 10-04 | 10-11 | 04-02 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-08 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 258 | |
M2 | 10-04 | 10-11 | 04-02 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-08 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 258 | ||
M3 | 10-04 | 10-11 | 04-02 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-10 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 258 | ||
M4 | 10-04 | 10-11 | 04-02 | 04-21 | 04-29 | 05-10 | 05-19 | 06-19 | 258 | ||
B3 | M1 | 10-15 | 10-25 | 04-09 | 04-26 | 05-06 | 05-14 | 05-23 | 06-19 | 247 | |
M2 | 10-15 | 10-25 | 04-09 | 04-26 | 05-06 | 05-14 | 05-23 | 06-19 | 247 | ||
M3 | 10-15 | 10-25 | 04-09 | 04-26 | 05-06 | 05-14 | 05-23 | 06-19 | 247 | ||
M4 | 10-15 | 10-25 | 04-09 | 04-26 | 05-06 | 05-14 | 05-23 | 06-19 | 247 |
品种 Variety | 播期 Sowing date | 密度 Density | 出苗率 Emergence rate/% | 基本苗 Basic seedling/ (104 hm-2) | 冬前总茎数 Stems before winter/ (104 hm-2) | 越冬率 Winter survival rate/% | 返青后株数 Plants after turn green/ (104 hm-2) | 最高总茎数 Maximum total number of stem/ (104 hm-2) | 收获穗数 Harvest spike/ (104 hm-2) | 单株 穗数 Spikes per plant | 分蘖成穗率 Percentage of ear-bearing tiller/% | 产量 Yield/ (kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新冬22 | B1 | M1 | 91.68 a | 288.79 d | 910.08 ef | 95.37 abcd | 275.36 f | 1 412.14 de | 551.25 g | 2.00 a | 24.31 ab | 5 709.50 fg |
Xindong 22 | M2 | 91.49 a | 466.59 c | 1 176.68 bc | 96.88 ab | 451.97 d | 1 689.05 ab | 764.99 d | 1.69 c | 25.32 a | 7 396.78 bc | |
M3 | 92.35 a | 651.08 b | 1 268.49 a | 94.28 abcd | 613.81 c | 1 786.84 a | 846.03 b | 1.38 f | 19.74 c | 7 459.72 bc | ||
M4 | 90.66 a | 815.96 a | 1 239.40 ab | 95.47 abcd | 778.80 a | 1 793.20 a | 891.01 a | 1.14 gh | 10.95 e | 7 073.57 cd | ||
B2 | M1 | 91.01 a | 286.68 d | 821.82 g | 96.78 ab | 277.38 f | 1 250.66 ef | 510.31 h | 1.84 b | 23.95 ab | 6 160.78 ef | |
M2 | 91.39 a | 466.10 c | 1 086.97 d | 97.14 a | 452.8 d | 1 552.57 bcd | 729.31 e | 1.61 d | 25.16 a | 7 822.98 b | ||
M3 | 91.10 a | 642.28 b | 982.39 e | 96.44 abc | 619.55 c | 1 437.40 cde | 712.05 e | 1.15 g | 11.29 de | 8 541.04 a | ||
M4 | 90.62 a | 815.62 a | 1 094.19 cd | 93.08 d | 759.25 ab | 1 614.49 abc | 809.98 c | 1.07 h | 5.97 f | 7 366.48 bc | ||
B3 | M1 | 90.91 a | 286.37 d | 577.50 h | 93.48 cd | 267.69 f | 1 008.80 g | 437.85 i | 1.64 cd | 23.11 b | 5 523.59 g | |
M2 | 89.57 a | 456.80 c | 808.41 g | 92.78 d | 423.65 e | 1 296.11 e | 622.20 f | 1.47 e | 22.87 b | 6 506.96 de | ||
M3 | 91.10 a | 642.28 b | 866.03 fg | 93.78 bcd | 602.34 c | 1 353.70 e | 697.95 e | 1.16 g | 12.73 d | 6 968.60 cd | ||
M4 | 89.76 a | 807.84 a | 835.97 fg | 92.78 d | 749.77 b | 1 101.41 fg | 702.03 e | 0.94 i | 0.00 g | 6 767.39 d | ||
邯郸5316 | B1 | M1 | 92.06 a | 289.98 d | 1 130.78 def | 93.01 abc | 269.72 f | 1 646.38 cde | 598.51 f | 2.22 a | 23.87 b | 6 603.97 d |
Handan | M2 | 91.58 a | 467.07 c | 1 483.31 ab | 92.18 abcd | 430.66 e | 2 059.68 ab | 841.50 c | 1.95 b | 25.41 ab | 7 883.55 b | |
5316 | M3 | 92.44 a | 651.70 b | 1 488.22 ab | 92.22 abcd | 601.10 c | 2 020.10 ab | 874.19 bc | 1.45 e | 19.25 c | 7 379.76 b | |
M4 | 92.06 a | 828.53 a | 1 563.22 a | 91.87 abcd | 760.77 a | 2 178.98 a | 972.01 a | 1.28 fg | 14.82 de | 6 520.28 de | ||
B2 | M1 | 92.25 a | 290.58 d | 999.09 f | 94.66 a | 274.97 f | 1 406.20 e | 560.71 f | 2.04 b | 25.27 ab | 7 684.48 b | |
M2 | 91.20 a | 465.13 c | 1 278.48 cd | 95.12 a | 442.48 e | 1 829.88 bc | 790.48 d | 1.79 c | 25.19 ab | 9 218.08 a | ||
M3 | 91.77 a | 647.00 b | 1 213.90 de | 94.04 ab | 608.18 c | 1 683.79 cd | 789.62 d | 1.30 f | 16.92 d | 8 783.87 a | ||
M4 | 91.20 a | 820.81 a | 1 374.25 bc | 93.17 abc | 764.41 a | 1 829.75 bc | 909.02 b | 1.19 gh | 13.66 e | 7 708.44 b | ||
B3 | M1 | 89.87 a | 283.09 d | 764.81 g | 90.17 bcd | 255.01 f | 1 101.86 f | 472.51 g | 1.85 c | 25.82 ab | 5 934.63 e | |
M2 | 90.34 a | 460.76 c | 1 098.46 ef | 90.02 bcd | 414.62 e | 1 504.16 de | 698.69 e | 1.69 d | 26.18 a | 7 321.88 bc | ||
M3 | 90.15 a | 635.59 b | 1 154.77 de | 88.79 d | 564.47 d | 1 556.87 de | 775.52 d | 1.37 ef | 21.35 c | 7 539.21 b | ||
M4 | 89.77 a | 807.96 a | 1 219.09 de | 89.17 cd | 721.08 b | 1 613.47 cde | 846.00 c | 1.18 h | 13.90 e | 6 778.11 cd |
表2 播期和密度对滴灌冬小麦群体生长与产量的影响
Table 2 Effects of sowing date and density on population growth and yield of winter wheat under drip irrigation
品种 Variety | 播期 Sowing date | 密度 Density | 出苗率 Emergence rate/% | 基本苗 Basic seedling/ (104 hm-2) | 冬前总茎数 Stems before winter/ (104 hm-2) | 越冬率 Winter survival rate/% | 返青后株数 Plants after turn green/ (104 hm-2) | 最高总茎数 Maximum total number of stem/ (104 hm-2) | 收获穗数 Harvest spike/ (104 hm-2) | 单株 穗数 Spikes per plant | 分蘖成穗率 Percentage of ear-bearing tiller/% | 产量 Yield/ (kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新冬22 | B1 | M1 | 91.68 a | 288.79 d | 910.08 ef | 95.37 abcd | 275.36 f | 1 412.14 de | 551.25 g | 2.00 a | 24.31 ab | 5 709.50 fg |
Xindong 22 | M2 | 91.49 a | 466.59 c | 1 176.68 bc | 96.88 ab | 451.97 d | 1 689.05 ab | 764.99 d | 1.69 c | 25.32 a | 7 396.78 bc | |
M3 | 92.35 a | 651.08 b | 1 268.49 a | 94.28 abcd | 613.81 c | 1 786.84 a | 846.03 b | 1.38 f | 19.74 c | 7 459.72 bc | ||
M4 | 90.66 a | 815.96 a | 1 239.40 ab | 95.47 abcd | 778.80 a | 1 793.20 a | 891.01 a | 1.14 gh | 10.95 e | 7 073.57 cd | ||
B2 | M1 | 91.01 a | 286.68 d | 821.82 g | 96.78 ab | 277.38 f | 1 250.66 ef | 510.31 h | 1.84 b | 23.95 ab | 6 160.78 ef | |
M2 | 91.39 a | 466.10 c | 1 086.97 d | 97.14 a | 452.8 d | 1 552.57 bcd | 729.31 e | 1.61 d | 25.16 a | 7 822.98 b | ||
M3 | 91.10 a | 642.28 b | 982.39 e | 96.44 abc | 619.55 c | 1 437.40 cde | 712.05 e | 1.15 g | 11.29 de | 8 541.04 a | ||
M4 | 90.62 a | 815.62 a | 1 094.19 cd | 93.08 d | 759.25 ab | 1 614.49 abc | 809.98 c | 1.07 h | 5.97 f | 7 366.48 bc | ||
B3 | M1 | 90.91 a | 286.37 d | 577.50 h | 93.48 cd | 267.69 f | 1 008.80 g | 437.85 i | 1.64 cd | 23.11 b | 5 523.59 g | |
M2 | 89.57 a | 456.80 c | 808.41 g | 92.78 d | 423.65 e | 1 296.11 e | 622.20 f | 1.47 e | 22.87 b | 6 506.96 de | ||
M3 | 91.10 a | 642.28 b | 866.03 fg | 93.78 bcd | 602.34 c | 1 353.70 e | 697.95 e | 1.16 g | 12.73 d | 6 968.60 cd | ||
M4 | 89.76 a | 807.84 a | 835.97 fg | 92.78 d | 749.77 b | 1 101.41 fg | 702.03 e | 0.94 i | 0.00 g | 6 767.39 d | ||
邯郸5316 | B1 | M1 | 92.06 a | 289.98 d | 1 130.78 def | 93.01 abc | 269.72 f | 1 646.38 cde | 598.51 f | 2.22 a | 23.87 b | 6 603.97 d |
Handan | M2 | 91.58 a | 467.07 c | 1 483.31 ab | 92.18 abcd | 430.66 e | 2 059.68 ab | 841.50 c | 1.95 b | 25.41 ab | 7 883.55 b | |
5316 | M3 | 92.44 a | 651.70 b | 1 488.22 ab | 92.22 abcd | 601.10 c | 2 020.10 ab | 874.19 bc | 1.45 e | 19.25 c | 7 379.76 b | |
M4 | 92.06 a | 828.53 a | 1 563.22 a | 91.87 abcd | 760.77 a | 2 178.98 a | 972.01 a | 1.28 fg | 14.82 de | 6 520.28 de | ||
B2 | M1 | 92.25 a | 290.58 d | 999.09 f | 94.66 a | 274.97 f | 1 406.20 e | 560.71 f | 2.04 b | 25.27 ab | 7 684.48 b | |
M2 | 91.20 a | 465.13 c | 1 278.48 cd | 95.12 a | 442.48 e | 1 829.88 bc | 790.48 d | 1.79 c | 25.19 ab | 9 218.08 a | ||
M3 | 91.77 a | 647.00 b | 1 213.90 de | 94.04 ab | 608.18 c | 1 683.79 cd | 789.62 d | 1.30 f | 16.92 d | 8 783.87 a | ||
M4 | 91.20 a | 820.81 a | 1 374.25 bc | 93.17 abc | 764.41 a | 1 829.75 bc | 909.02 b | 1.19 gh | 13.66 e | 7 708.44 b | ||
B3 | M1 | 89.87 a | 283.09 d | 764.81 g | 90.17 bcd | 255.01 f | 1 101.86 f | 472.51 g | 1.85 c | 25.82 ab | 5 934.63 e | |
M2 | 90.34 a | 460.76 c | 1 098.46 ef | 90.02 bcd | 414.62 e | 1 504.16 de | 698.69 e | 1.69 d | 26.18 a | 7 321.88 bc | ||
M3 | 90.15 a | 635.59 b | 1 154.77 de | 88.79 d | 564.47 d | 1 556.87 de | 775.52 d | 1.37 ef | 21.35 c | 7 539.21 b | ||
M4 | 89.77 a | 807.96 a | 1 219.09 de | 89.17 cd | 721.08 b | 1 613.47 cde | 846.00 c | 1.18 h | 13.90 e | 6 778.11 cd |
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 出苗率 Emergence rate | 基本苗 Basic seedling | 冬前总茎数 Stems before winter | 越冬率 Winter survival rate | 返青后株数 Plants after turn green | 最高总茎数 Maximum total number of stem | 收获穗数 Harvest spike | 单株穗数 Spikes per plant | 分蘖成穗率 Percentage of ear-bearing tiller | 产量 Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新冬22 | B | 1.80ns | 1.34ns | 58.17** | 3.89ns | 8.00* | 23.12** | 83.12** | 64.52** | 68.89** | 33.53** |
Xindong 22 | M | 1.24ns | 6 021.40** | 107.04** | 1.75ns | 2 132.64** | 23.24** | 474.96** | 547.44** | 761.43** | 43.85** |
B×M | 0.35ns | 0.33ns | 4.90** | 1.46ns | 0.90ns | 3.74* | 7.50** | 4.68** | 24.39** | 1.74ns | |
邯郸5316 | B | 15.48* | 6.93* | 2 504.34** | 228.45** | 101.51** | 66.92** | 726.24** | 77.40** | 10.36* | 36.96** |
Handan | M | 0.09ns | 2 005.54** | 29.73** | 0.44ns | 912.00** | 16.86** | 208.99** | 340.82** | 138.86** | 39.11** |
5316 | B×M | 0.08ns | 0.16ns | 0.46ns | 0.08ns | 0.38ns | 0.28ns | 0.97ns | 4.35** | 2.18** | 2.13ns |
表3 ANOVA检验F值
Table 3 F value of ANOVA
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 出苗率 Emergence rate | 基本苗 Basic seedling | 冬前总茎数 Stems before winter | 越冬率 Winter survival rate | 返青后株数 Plants after turn green | 最高总茎数 Maximum total number of stem | 收获穗数 Harvest spike | 单株穗数 Spikes per plant | 分蘖成穗率 Percentage of ear-bearing tiller | 产量 Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新冬22 | B | 1.80ns | 1.34ns | 58.17** | 3.89ns | 8.00* | 23.12** | 83.12** | 64.52** | 68.89** | 33.53** |
Xindong 22 | M | 1.24ns | 6 021.40** | 107.04** | 1.75ns | 2 132.64** | 23.24** | 474.96** | 547.44** | 761.43** | 43.85** |
B×M | 0.35ns | 0.33ns | 4.90** | 1.46ns | 0.90ns | 3.74* | 7.50** | 4.68** | 24.39** | 1.74ns | |
邯郸5316 | B | 15.48* | 6.93* | 2 504.34** | 228.45** | 101.51** | 66.92** | 726.24** | 77.40** | 10.36* | 36.96** |
Handan | M | 0.09ns | 2 005.54** | 29.73** | 0.44ns | 912.00** | 16.86** | 208.99** | 340.82** | 138.86** | 39.11** |
5316 | B×M | 0.08ns | 0.16ns | 0.46ns | 0.08ns | 0.38ns | 0.28ns | 0.97ns | 4.35** | 2.18** | 2.13ns |
品种 Variety | 播期 Sowing date | 密度 Seeding rate | 基部节间特征Characteristics of basal internode | 重心高度 Height of center of gravity/cm | 抗倒指数 Lodging resistance index/(N·cm-1) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
长度 Length/cm | 直径 Diameter/cm | 机械强度 Mechanical strength/N | |||||
新冬22 | B1 | M1 | 8.54 d | 0.446 a | 5.02 a | 46.31 c | 10.85 a |
Xindong 22 | M2 | 9.17 c | 0.423 a | 4.93 a | 47.35 c | 10.42 a | |
M3 | 9.76 b | 0.350 b | 3.94 b | 49.43 b | 7.98 b | ||
M4 | 10.15 a | 0.384 b | 3.36 c | 50.77 a | 6.62 c | ||
B2 | M1 | 8.45 d | 0.462 a | 5.08 a | 44.41 c | 11.44 a | |
M2 | 8.93c | 0.432 b | 5.00 a | 45.90 c | 10.89 b | ||
M3 | 9.26 b | 0.421 bc | 4.62 b | 48.06 b | 9.61 c | ||
M4 | 9.92 a | 0.402 c | 3.52 c | 50.25 a | 7.00 d | ||
B3 | M1 | 8.28 b | 0.472 a | 5.12 a | 43.27 b | 11.83 a | |
M2 | 8.60 b | 0.461 a | 5.01 a | 43.54 b | 11.50 a | ||
M3 | 9.08 a | 0.434 b | 4.68 b | 47.13 a | 9.93 b | ||
M4 | 9.12 a | 0.432 b | 4.56 b | 47.43 a | 9.61 b | ||
邯郸5316 | B1 | M1 | 8.27 c | 0.473 a | 5.07 a | 43.61 c | 11.63 a |
Handan 5316 | M2 | 8.81 b | 0.424 b | 4.88 a | 46.13 b | 10.59 b | |
M3 | 9.87 a | 0.402 c | 3.58 b | 48.87 a | 7.33 c | ||
M4 | 10.08 a | 0.381 d | 3.51 b | 49.49 a | 7.10 c | ||
B2 | M1 | 8.25 c | 0.481 a | 5.06 a | 43.55 c | 11.62 a | |
M2 | 8.28c | 0.444 b | 5.06 a | 43.62 c | 11.61 a | ||
M3 | 9.49 b | 0.430 b | 4.28 b | 48.51 b | 8.83 b | ||
M4 | 9.99 a | 0.404 c | 3.64 c | 50.25 a | 7.25 c | ||
B3 | M1 | 8.24 c | 0.507 a | 5.17 a | 43.44 d | 11.89 a | |
M2 | 8.53 bc | 0.488 a | 5.01 ab | 44.84 c | 11.17 b | ||
M3 | 8.96 ab | 0.447 b | 4.74 bc | 46.26 b | 10.24 c | ||
M4 | 9.43 a | 0.422 b | 4.64 c | 48.46 a | 9.58 c |
表4 播期和密度对滴灌冬小麦基部节间形态特征与抗倒指数的影响
Table 4 Effects of sowing date and density on morphological characteristics of basal internode and lodging resistance index of winter wheat under drip irrigation
品种 Variety | 播期 Sowing date | 密度 Seeding rate | 基部节间特征Characteristics of basal internode | 重心高度 Height of center of gravity/cm | 抗倒指数 Lodging resistance index/(N·cm-1) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
长度 Length/cm | 直径 Diameter/cm | 机械强度 Mechanical strength/N | |||||
新冬22 | B1 | M1 | 8.54 d | 0.446 a | 5.02 a | 46.31 c | 10.85 a |
Xindong 22 | M2 | 9.17 c | 0.423 a | 4.93 a | 47.35 c | 10.42 a | |
M3 | 9.76 b | 0.350 b | 3.94 b | 49.43 b | 7.98 b | ||
M4 | 10.15 a | 0.384 b | 3.36 c | 50.77 a | 6.62 c | ||
B2 | M1 | 8.45 d | 0.462 a | 5.08 a | 44.41 c | 11.44 a | |
M2 | 8.93c | 0.432 b | 5.00 a | 45.90 c | 10.89 b | ||
M3 | 9.26 b | 0.421 bc | 4.62 b | 48.06 b | 9.61 c | ||
M4 | 9.92 a | 0.402 c | 3.52 c | 50.25 a | 7.00 d | ||
B3 | M1 | 8.28 b | 0.472 a | 5.12 a | 43.27 b | 11.83 a | |
M2 | 8.60 b | 0.461 a | 5.01 a | 43.54 b | 11.50 a | ||
M3 | 9.08 a | 0.434 b | 4.68 b | 47.13 a | 9.93 b | ||
M4 | 9.12 a | 0.432 b | 4.56 b | 47.43 a | 9.61 b | ||
邯郸5316 | B1 | M1 | 8.27 c | 0.473 a | 5.07 a | 43.61 c | 11.63 a |
Handan 5316 | M2 | 8.81 b | 0.424 b | 4.88 a | 46.13 b | 10.59 b | |
M3 | 9.87 a | 0.402 c | 3.58 b | 48.87 a | 7.33 c | ||
M4 | 10.08 a | 0.381 d | 3.51 b | 49.49 a | 7.10 c | ||
B2 | M1 | 8.25 c | 0.481 a | 5.06 a | 43.55 c | 11.62 a | |
M2 | 8.28c | 0.444 b | 5.06 a | 43.62 c | 11.61 a | ||
M3 | 9.49 b | 0.430 b | 4.28 b | 48.51 b | 8.83 b | ||
M4 | 9.99 a | 0.404 c | 3.64 c | 50.25 a | 7.25 c | ||
B3 | M1 | 8.24 c | 0.507 a | 5.17 a | 43.44 d | 11.89 a | |
M2 | 8.53 bc | 0.488 a | 5.01 ab | 44.84 c | 11.17 b | ||
M3 | 8.96 ab | 0.447 b | 4.74 bc | 46.26 b | 10.24 c | ||
M4 | 9.43 a | 0.422 b | 4.64 c | 48.46 a | 9.58 c |
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 基部节间特征Characteristics of basal internode | 重心高度 Height of center of gravity | 抗倒指数 Lodging resistance index | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
长度 Length | 直径 Diamete | 机械强度 Mechanical strength | ||||
新冬22 | B | 1.04ns | 0.97ns | 197.24** | 0.37ns | 133.48** |
Xindong 22 | M | 2.45ns | 2.77ns | 127.08** | 6.29** | 172.428** |
B×M | 0.98ns | 0.07ns | 13.11** | 0.83ns | 8.22** | |
邯郸5316 | B | 0.87ns | 0.97ns | 51.58** | 2.88ns | 61.47** |
Handan 5316 | M | 2.75ns | 2.70ns | 90.58** | 6.13** | 147.58** |
B×M | 0.52ns | 0.12ns | 10.20** | 0.20ns | 9.58** |
表5 ANOVA检验F值
Table 5 F value of ANOVA
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 基部节间特征Characteristics of basal internode | 重心高度 Height of center of gravity | 抗倒指数 Lodging resistance index | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
长度 Length | 直径 Diamete | 机械强度 Mechanical strength | ||||
新冬22 | B | 1.04ns | 0.97ns | 197.24** | 0.37ns | 133.48** |
Xindong 22 | M | 2.45ns | 2.77ns | 127.08** | 6.29** | 172.428** |
B×M | 0.98ns | 0.07ns | 13.11** | 0.83ns | 8.22** | |
邯郸5316 | B | 0.87ns | 0.97ns | 51.58** | 2.88ns | 61.47** |
Handan 5316 | M | 2.75ns | 2.70ns | 90.58** | 6.13** | 147.58** |
B×M | 0.52ns | 0.12ns | 10.20** | 0.20ns | 9.58** |
图1 播期和密度对新冬22与邯郸5316叶面积指数的影响 a、b、c分别表示新冬22在B1、B2和B3播期下的LAI指标;d、e、f分别表示邯郸5316在B1、B2和B3播期下的LAI指标。RP,起身期;JS,拔节期;BS,孕穗期;HD,抽穗期;FS,扬花期;GFS,籽粒形成期;EFS,灌浆初期;MFS,灌浆中期;DS,蜡熟期。
Fig.1 Effects of sowing date and density on leaf area index of Xindong 22 and Handan 5316 a, b and c in the figure showed the leaf area index of Xindong 22 under the sowing dates of B1, B2 and B3, respectively; d, e and f showed the leaf area index of Handan 5316 under the sowing dates of B1, B2 and B3, respectively. RP, Rising period; JS, Jointing stage; BS, Booting stage; HD, Heading date; FS, Flowering stage; GFS, Grain formation stage; EFS, Early filling stage; MFS, Mid-filling stage; DS, Dough stage.
[1] |
ZHENG M J, CHEN J, SHI Y H, et al. Manipulation of lignin metabolism by plant densities and its relationship with lodging resistance in wheat[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017,7:19-26.
DOI URL PMID |
[2] | 河南省小麦高稳优低研究推广协作组. 小麦生态与生产技术[M]. 郑州:河南科学技术出版社, 1986. |
[3] |
郜庆炉, 薛香, 梁云娟, 等. 暖冬气候条件下调整小麦播种期的研究[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2002,22(2):46-50.
DOI URL |
GAO Q L, XUE X, LIANG Y J, et al. Studies on regulating sowing time of wheat under the warm winter conditions[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2002,22(2):46-50.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 朱傅祥, 吴建中, 郁祖良, 等. 播期密度对豫麦29群个体质量性状的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2000,28(5):21-24. |
ZHU F X, WU J Z, YU Z L, et al. Effects of sowing date and density on population and individual quality traits of Yumai 29[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2000,28(5):21-24.(in Chinese) | |
[5] | 山东农学院. 作物栽培学(北方本)[M]. 北京:农业出版社, 1980. |
[6] | 王东, 于振文, 贾效成. 播期对优质强筋冬小麦籽粒产量和品质的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2004,36(2):25-26. |
WANG D, YU Z W, JIA X C. Effect of sowing date on grain yield and quality of high quality and strong gluten winter wheat[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2004,36(2):25-26.(in Chinese) | |
[7] | 邵庆勤, 周琴, 王笑, 等. 种植密度对不同小麦品种茎秆形态特征、化学成分及抗倒性能的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2018,41(5):808-816. |
SHAO Q Q, ZHOU Q, WANG X, et al. Effects of planting density on stem morphological characteristics, chemical composition and lodging resistance of different wheat varieties[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2018,41(5):808-816.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 李华英, 代兴龙, 张宇, 等. 播期对冬小麦产量和抗倒性能的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2015,35(3):357-363. |
LI H Y, DAI X L, ZHANG Y, et al. Effect of sowing date on grain yield and lodging resistance of winter wheat[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2015,35(3):357-363.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | VERMA D, GONTIA A S, JHA A, et al. Study on leaf area index and leaf area duration of growth analytical parameters in wheat, barley, and oat[J]. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology, 2016,9(5):827-831. |
[10] | 房春兴, 沈恩庭. 不同播期和密度对偃展4110小麦群体动态及产量的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2009,12(21):26. |
FANG C X, SHENG E T. Effects of different sowing dates and densities on population dynamics and yield of Yanzhan 4110[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2009,12(21):26. (in Chinese) | |
[11] | 刘萍. 不同播期及密度对滴灌小麦群体质量及产量的影响[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2014. |
LIU P. Effect of seeding rate and planting density oil population trait and grain yield of drip irrigated wheat[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2014.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 欧行奇, 郭丹钊, 成立群, 等. 土壤质地和播期对强筋小麦藁城8901品质及产量的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2007,27(4):705-709. |
OU X Q, GUO D Z, CHENG L Q, et al. Effect of soil texture and seedtime on yield and quality of strong-gluten wheat Gaocheng 8901[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2007,27(4):705-709.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 周晓虎. 播期和播量对不同穗型冬小麦籽粒产量形成及氮素利用效率的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2013. |
ZHOU X H. Effects of sowing date and sowing rate on grain yield and utilization efficiency of different spike winter wheat[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2013.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 王夏, 胡新, 孙忠富, 等. 不同播期和播量对小麦群体性状和产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011,27(21):170-176. |
WANG X, HU X, SUN Z F, et al. Effect of different sowing dates and planting density on group characters and yield of wheat[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011,27(21):170-176.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 梁玉超, 张永强, 石书兵, 等. 种植密度对滴灌冬小麦茎秆特性及抗倒伏性能的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018,55(6):1056-1064. |
LIANG Y C, ZHANG Y Q, SHI S B, et al. Effects of different plant densities on stem morphology characteristics and lodging resistance in winter wheat under drip irrigation[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018,55(6):1056-1064.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 宜丽宏, 王丽, 张孟妮, 等. 不同灌溉方式对冬小麦生长发育及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2017,36(10):14-19. |
YI L H, WANG L, ZHANG M N, et al. Effect of irrigation methods on growth and water use efficiency of winter wheat[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2017,36(10):14-19.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 阚茗溪, 钤太峰, 郭风法, 等. 适期晚播对不同密度冬小麦产量和茎秆抗倒性能的调控效应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019,35(32):1-6. |
KAN M X, QIAN T F, GUO F F, et al. Effect of late sowing on lodging resistance and grain yield of winter wheat at different densities[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019,35(32):1-6.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 李华英. 种植密度和播期对冬小麦籽粒产量和抗倒性能的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2015. |
LI H Y. The effects of plant density and sowing date on grain yield and lodging resistance of winter wheat[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2015.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 刘万代, 陈现勇, 尹钧, 等. 播期和密度对冬小麦豫麦49-198群体性状和产量的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2009,29(3):464-469. |
LIU W D, CHEN X Y, YIN J, et al. Effect of sowing date and planting density on population trait and grain yield of winter wheat cultivar Yumai 49-198[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2009,29(3):464-469.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 杨秀兰, 牛一川, 康辉. 不同播种密度对地膜小麦重要农艺性状的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2007,25(6):70-73. |
YANG X L, NIU Y C, KANG H. Effect of different planting density on the main agronomic traits of film-mulched wheat[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2007,25(6):70-73.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 唐兴旺, 骆兰平, 于振文, 等. 不同产量潜力品种小麦群体动态和干物质积累特性的差异[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020,52(3):29-33. |
TANG X W, LUO L P, YU Z W, et al. Differences in population dynamics and dry matter accumulation characteristics of wheat varieties with different yield potential[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2020,52(3):29-33.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 王兰, 王良, 刘肖瑜, 等. 不同年型下冬小麦适宜播期及密度研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 2019,51(3):29-35. |
WANG L, WANG L, LIU X Y, et al. Study on suitable sowing time and density of winter wheat under different year types[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2019,51(3):29-35.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 叶程. 播期和播量对冬小麦品种小偃22生长和产量的影响[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2019. |
YE C. Effects of sowing date and seed rate on crop growth and grain yield of winter wheat variety Xiaoyan22[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2019.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 乔祥梅, 王志伟, 程加省, 等. 低纬高原区不同生态条件下旱地小麦新品种(系)产量形成及其群体动态特征差异[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2019,39(12):1468-1476. |
QIAO X M, WANG Z W, CHENG J S, et al. Difference in yield and population dynamics characteristics of new dryland wheat cultivars(lines) under different ecological conditions in low latitude plateau region[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2019,39(12):1468-1476.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 王枭轩, 孟庆岩, 张海香, 魏香琴, 杨泽楠. 基于粒子群神经网络模型反演玉米、小麦叶面积指数[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(7): 1170-1176. |
[2] | 潘俊峰, 钟旭华, 黄农荣, 刘彦卓, 田卡, 梁开明, 彭碧琳, 傅友强, 胡香玉. 不同栽培模式对华南双季晚稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(6): 857-868. |
[3] | 俞明涛, 张科锋. 基于HYDRUS-2D软件的土壤水力特征参数反演及间接地下滴灌的土壤水分运动模拟[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(3): 458-468. |
[4] | 邱乐丰, 虞舟鲁. 1979—2020年杭州市富阳区土地利用对耕层土壤有机碳储量变化的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(2): 291-296. |
[5] | 胡园, 张涛, 蔡景波, 唐明, 罗奎, 胡利华. 养殖密度、水层、规格对浅海筏架吊笼养殖刺参生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(4): 548-553. |
[6] | 隋益虎, 胡能兵, 唐金宝. 密度、氮肥及硼肥对紫色辣椒凤紫运1号的产量效应分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(3): 413-419. |
[7] | 黄楚荻, 鲁蕾, 刘勇, 刘巨峰. 基于高分辨率遥感影像的玉米田叶面积指数反演[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(2): 339-349. |
[8] | 薛运宏, 刘箴, 刘继锋, 李学文, 尹周祥. 信阳地区冬小麦生育期水分供需及干旱特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(1): 14-25. |
[9] | 李媛媛, 杨恒山, 张瑞富, 范秀艳, 李金琴, 柳宝林, 德力格尔. 浅埋滴灌条件下不同灌水量对春玉米干物质积累与转运的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(8): 1234-1242. |
[10] | 黄聪1,2,赵小敏2,*,郭熙1,2,谢文1,2,张佳佳1,2,叶英聪1,2. 多维视角下江西省余江县农村居民点分布特征及其影响因素[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(8): 1428-. |
[11] | 余鹏1, 2,王俊梅1, 2,叶胜海2,翟荣荣2,朱国富2,金庆生2,张小明2, *. 播期对浙江省常规晚粳稻品质性状的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(5): 724-. |
[12] | 安巧霞,孙三民*,徐镕,顾凯凯,赵京浩,马金阳,蔡虹. 间接地下滴灌水盐运移影响因素研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(5): 843-. |
[13] | 陈书强,杨丽敏,赵海新,杜晓东,周通,薛菁芳,金光浩,单莉莉,王翠,李敏. 株行距配置和插植苗数对寒地水稻产量和倒伏性状的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(3): 371-. |
[14] | 李向龙,张晓东,张中宝,张立全,吴忠义*. 密度对不同玉米杂交组合穗部性状及产量构成因素的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(5): 713-. |
[15] | 姚俊萌1,2,李迎春2,张金恩2,舒婷3,陆魁东4. 播期和抽穗期温度对水稻岳优9113生长及产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(5): 718-. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||