浙江农业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 932-943.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.05.19
农村产业融合的多功能绩效评价与障碍因子分析
方相(
), 杨钢桥*(), 黄丹
- 华中农业大学 公共管理学院,湖北 武汉 430070
-
收稿日期:2020-09-22出版日期:2021-05-25发布日期:2021-05-25 -
通讯作者:杨钢桥 -
作者简介:*杨钢桥,E-mail:ygq@mail.hzau.edu.cn
方相(1997—),女,湖北黄冈人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为农村土地整治。E-mail:fangx1997@qq.com -
基金资助:国家自然科学基金(71503091);国家自然科学基金(71904150)
Multifunctional performance evaluation and obstacle factor analysis of rural industrial convergence
FANG Xiang(), YANG Gangqiao*(), HUANG Dan
- College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
-
Received:2020-09-22Online:2021-05-25Published:2021-05-25 -
Contact:YANG Gangqiao
摘要：
农村产业融合的实质就是拓展农业多功能,从多功能视角来研究农村产业融合的绩效与障碍因子,可为农村产业融合发展提供科学依据。基于农村产业融合经营模式,从过程与结果2个维度构建农村产业融合的多功能绩效评价指标体系,采用熵权TOPSIS法和障碍度模型,以湖北省4个典型案例村为代表,分别表征4种农村产业融合经营模式(模式Ⅰ,农户独立经营模式;模式Ⅱ,农业企业/合作社规模化经营模式;模式Ⅲ-A,“农业企业+合作社+农户”中介组织联动型经营模式;模式Ⅲ-B,“农业企业+合作社+农户”一体化经营模式),对其进行调查分析,评价其农村产业融合的多功能绩效与障碍因子。结果显示:不同农村产业融合经营模式的多功能绩效存在差异,相较于模式Ⅱ,农户协作经营模式(含模式Ⅲ-A和模式Ⅲ-B)的多功能绩效水平较高,其中模式Ⅲ-B的多功能绩效水平更高。不同农村产业融合经营模式的多功能绩效障碍因子不同。模式Ⅰ和模式Ⅱ目前主要以农村休闲观光旅游为主导产业,影响其多功能绩效的障碍因子主要集中在农业生产、加工业生产、生态系统服务方面;模式Ⅲ-A和模式Ⅲ-B目前主要以农业、加工业为主导产业,影响其多功能绩效的障碍因子主要集中在旅游服务等非农生产活动方面。结果表明:为了提高不同农村产业融合经营模式的多功能绩效,应引导农业企业、合作社与农户建立稳定的利益联结机制,注重多功能协调,因地制宜地发展农村产业。
中图分类号:
引用本文
方相, 杨钢桥, 黄丹. 农村产业融合的多功能绩效评价与障碍因子分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(5): 932-943.
FANG Xiang, YANG Gangqiao, HUANG Dan. Multifunctional performance evaluation and obstacle factor analysis of rural industrial convergence[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(5): 932-943.
表1 农村产业融合多功能绩效评价指标体系
Table 1 Multifunctional performance evaluation index system of rural industry convergence
| 目标层 Target layer | 准则层 Criterion layer | 过程/结果视角 Process/result perspective | 指标层 Index layer | 量化方法 Quantification method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 产业融合多 功能绩效 Multifunctional | 生产功能 绩效 Production | 过程视角 Process perspective | X1:耕园地实际耕种面积占比 Proportion of the actual cultivated area of farmland | 耕园地实际耕种面积/耕园地总面积 Actual cultivated area of farmland/total area of farmland |
| performance of industrial convergence | function performance | X2:非农产业用地面积占比 Proportion of non-agricultural industrial land area | 非农产业占地面积/集体建设用地总面积 Area of non-agricultural industry/total area of collective construction land | |
| X3:单位农用地面积的农业投资额 Agricultural investment per unit area of agricultural land | 农业投资总额/农用地总面积 Total agricultural investment/total area of agricultural land | |||
| X4:单位集体建设用地面积的非农投资额 Non-agricultural investment per unit area of collective construction land | 非农投资总额/集体建设用地总面积 Total non-agricultural investment/total area of collective construction land | |||
| 结果视角 Result perspective | X5:单位农用地面积的农业产值 Agricultural output value per unit area of agricultural land | 农业总产值/农用地总面积 Total agricultural output value/total area of agricultural land | ||
| X6:单位集体建设用地面积的非农业产值 Non-agricultural output value per unit aera of collective construction land | 非农业总产值/集体建设用地总面积 Non-agricultural output value/total area of collective construction land | |||
| 生态功能 绩效 | 过程视角 Process | X7:生态用地面积占比 Proportion of ecological land area | 生态用地面积/土地总面积 Ecological land area/total land area | |
| Ecological function performance | perspective | X8:单位耕园地面积的农用化学品施用量 Application amount of agricultural chemicals per unit area of farmland | 农药化肥农膜施用量/耕园地总面积 Amount of pesticide and fertilizer applied/total area of farmland | |
| X9:农村垃圾处理情况 Rural garbage disposal situation | 5级评分:1,最差;2,较差;3,一般;4,较好;5,最好 5-level scoring: 1, worst; 2, bad; 3, fair; 4, good; 5, best | |||
| X10:农村污水处理情况 Rural sewage treatment situation | 5级评分:1,最差;2,较差;3,一般;4,较好;5,最好 5-level scoring: 1, worst; 2, bad; 3, fair; 4, good; 5, best | |||
| 结果视角 Result perspective | X11:单位生态用地面积的生态系统服务价值 Ecosystem service value per unit area of ecological land | 生态系统服务价值/生态用地总面积 Ecosystem service value/total area of ecological land | ||
| X12:农业面源污染情况 Agricultural non-point source pollution | 农业面源污染指数/土地总面积 Agricultural non-point source pollution index/total land area | |||
| X13:污染治理满意度 Pollution control satisfaction | 5级满意度评价:1,非常不满意;2,比较不满意;3,一般;4,比较满意;5,非常满意 Subjective evaluation of 5 levels: 1, very dissatisfied; 2, relatively dissatisfied; 3, fair; 4, relatively satisfied; 5, very satisfied | |||
| 社会功能 绩效 | 过程视角 Process | X14:本地总就业人数占比 Proportion of total local employment | 本地总就业人数/本地总人口数 Total local employment/total local population | |
| Social function performance | perspective | X15:利益分配情况 Distribution of benefits | 5级评分:1,最差;2,较差;3,一般;4,较好;5,最好 5-level scoring: 1, worst; 2, bad; 3, fair; 4, good; 5, best | |
| 目标层 Target layer | 准则层 Criterion layer | 过程/结果视角 Process/result perspective | 指标层 Index layer | 量化方法 Quantification method |
| 结果视角 Result perspective | X16:村民生活水平 Villagers’ living standard | 农村居民总收入/本地总人数 Total income of rural residents/total local population | ||
| X17:民生满意度 Rural people’s livelihood satisfaction | 5级满意度评价:1,非常不满意;2,比较不满意;3,一般;4,比较满意;5,非常满意 Subjective evaluation of 5 levels: 1, very dissatisfied; 2, relatively dissatisfied; 3, fair; 4, relatively satisfied; 5, very satisfied | |||
| 休闲功能 绩效 Leisure | 过程视角 Process perspective | X18:地均农村景观休闲项目数量 Number of rural landscape leisure projects per unit area of land | 农村休闲景观项目总数量/土地总面积 Total number of rural landscape leisure projects/total land area | |
| function performance | X19:餐饮设施接待能力 Reception capacity of catering facilities | 接待总桌数/集体建设用地总面积 Total number of reception tables/total area of collective construction land | ||
| X20:住宿设施接待能力 Reception capacity of accommodation facilities | 住宿床位总数量/集体建设用地总面积 Total number of accommodation beds/total area of collective construction land | |||
| 结果视角 Result | X21:单位面积接收游客人数 Number of visitors per unit area | 年接收游客总人数/土地总面积 Total number of tourists/total land area | ||
| perspective | X22:旅游业产值占比 Proportion of tourism industry output value | 旅游业产值/农业和非农业总产值 Tourism output value/gross agricultural and non-agricultural output value |
表1 农村产业融合多功能绩效评价指标体系
Table 1 Multifunctional performance evaluation index system of rural industry convergence
| 目标层 Target layer | 准则层 Criterion layer | 过程/结果视角 Process/result perspective | 指标层 Index layer | 量化方法 Quantification method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 产业融合多 功能绩效 Multifunctional | 生产功能 绩效 Production | 过程视角 Process perspective | X1:耕园地实际耕种面积占比 Proportion of the actual cultivated area of farmland | 耕园地实际耕种面积/耕园地总面积 Actual cultivated area of farmland/total area of farmland |
| performance of industrial convergence | function performance | X2:非农产业用地面积占比 Proportion of non-agricultural industrial land area | 非农产业占地面积/集体建设用地总面积 Area of non-agricultural industry/total area of collective construction land | |
| X3:单位农用地面积的农业投资额 Agricultural investment per unit area of agricultural land | 农业投资总额/农用地总面积 Total agricultural investment/total area of agricultural land | |||
| X4:单位集体建设用地面积的非农投资额 Non-agricultural investment per unit area of collective construction land | 非农投资总额/集体建设用地总面积 Total non-agricultural investment/total area of collective construction land | |||
| 结果视角 Result perspective | X5:单位农用地面积的农业产值 Agricultural output value per unit area of agricultural land | 农业总产值/农用地总面积 Total agricultural output value/total area of agricultural land | ||
| X6:单位集体建设用地面积的非农业产值 Non-agricultural output value per unit aera of collective construction land | 非农业总产值/集体建设用地总面积 Non-agricultural output value/total area of collective construction land | |||
| 生态功能 绩效 | 过程视角 Process | X7:生态用地面积占比 Proportion of ecological land area | 生态用地面积/土地总面积 Ecological land area/total land area | |
| Ecological function performance | perspective | X8:单位耕园地面积的农用化学品施用量 Application amount of agricultural chemicals per unit area of farmland | 农药化肥农膜施用量/耕园地总面积 Amount of pesticide and fertilizer applied/total area of farmland | |
| X9:农村垃圾处理情况 Rural garbage disposal situation | 5级评分:1,最差;2,较差;3,一般;4,较好;5,最好 5-level scoring: 1, worst; 2, bad; 3, fair; 4, good; 5, best | |||
| X10:农村污水处理情况 Rural sewage treatment situation | 5级评分:1,最差;2,较差;3,一般;4,较好;5,最好 5-level scoring: 1, worst; 2, bad; 3, fair; 4, good; 5, best | |||
| 结果视角 Result perspective | X11:单位生态用地面积的生态系统服务价值 Ecosystem service value per unit area of ecological land | 生态系统服务价值/生态用地总面积 Ecosystem service value/total area of ecological land | ||
| X12:农业面源污染情况 Agricultural non-point source pollution | 农业面源污染指数/土地总面积 Agricultural non-point source pollution index/total land area | |||
| X13:污染治理满意度 Pollution control satisfaction | 5级满意度评价:1,非常不满意;2,比较不满意;3,一般;4,比较满意;5,非常满意 Subjective evaluation of 5 levels: 1, very dissatisfied; 2, relatively dissatisfied; 3, fair; 4, relatively satisfied; 5, very satisfied | |||
| 社会功能 绩效 | 过程视角 Process | X14:本地总就业人数占比 Proportion of total local employment | 本地总就业人数/本地总人口数 Total local employment/total local population | |
| Social function performance | perspective | X15:利益分配情况 Distribution of benefits | 5级评分:1,最差;2,较差;3,一般;4,较好;5,最好 5-level scoring: 1, worst; 2, bad; 3, fair; 4, good; 5, best | |
| 目标层 Target layer | 准则层 Criterion layer | 过程/结果视角 Process/result perspective | 指标层 Index layer | 量化方法 Quantification method |
| 结果视角 Result perspective | X16:村民生活水平 Villagers’ living standard | 农村居民总收入/本地总人数 Total income of rural residents/total local population | ||
| X17:民生满意度 Rural people’s livelihood satisfaction | 5级满意度评价:1,非常不满意;2,比较不满意;3,一般;4,比较满意;5,非常满意 Subjective evaluation of 5 levels: 1, very dissatisfied; 2, relatively dissatisfied; 3, fair; 4, relatively satisfied; 5, very satisfied | |||
| 休闲功能 绩效 Leisure | 过程视角 Process perspective | X18:地均农村景观休闲项目数量 Number of rural landscape leisure projects per unit area of land | 农村休闲景观项目总数量/土地总面积 Total number of rural landscape leisure projects/total land area | |
| function performance | X19:餐饮设施接待能力 Reception capacity of catering facilities | 接待总桌数/集体建设用地总面积 Total number of reception tables/total area of collective construction land | ||
| X20:住宿设施接待能力 Reception capacity of accommodation facilities | 住宿床位总数量/集体建设用地总面积 Total number of accommodation beds/total area of collective construction land | |||
| 结果视角 Result | X21:单位面积接收游客人数 Number of visitors per unit area | 年接收游客总人数/土地总面积 Total number of tourists/total land area | ||
| perspective | X22:旅游业产值占比 Proportion of tourism industry output value | 旅游业产值/农业和非农业总产值 Tourism output value/gross agricultural and non-agricultural output value |
表2 案例概况
Table 2 Overview of four cases
| 指标 Index | 小朱湾 Xiaozhuwan Village | 杜堂村 Dutang Village | 彭墩村 Pengdun Village | 马岭村 Maling Village |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 地貌类型Landform type | 低丘陵Low hills | 低丘陵Low hills | 低丘陵Low hills | 低丘陵Low hills |
| 人口Village population | 112 | 1 748 | 1 159 | 837 |
| 土地面积Land area/hm2 | 57.60 | 380.00 | 1 050.00 | 397.00 |
| 耕园地面积Farmland area/hm2 | 31.88 | 70.53 | 721.07 | 256.69 |
| GDP/(104 yuan) | 1 316.51 | 1 852.43 | 9 673.87 | 3 067.64 |
| 人均收入Per capita income/yuan | 42 929.96 | 14 523.90 | 33 274.37 | 38 241.65 |
表2 案例概况
Table 2 Overview of four cases
| 指标 Index | 小朱湾 Xiaozhuwan Village | 杜堂村 Dutang Village | 彭墩村 Pengdun Village | 马岭村 Maling Village |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 地貌类型Landform type | 低丘陵Low hills | 低丘陵Low hills | 低丘陵Low hills | 低丘陵Low hills |
| 人口Village population | 112 | 1 748 | 1 159 | 837 |
| 土地面积Land area/hm2 | 57.60 | 380.00 | 1 050.00 | 397.00 |
| 耕园地面积Farmland area/hm2 | 31.88 | 70.53 | 721.07 | 256.69 |
| GDP/(104 yuan) | 1 316.51 | 1 852.43 | 9 673.87 | 3 067.64 |
| 人均收入Per capita income/yuan | 42 929.96 | 14 523.90 | 33 274.37 | 38 241.65 |
表3 不同产业融合经营模式的各指标绩效
Table 3 Performance of indicators of different business modes of rural industrial convergence
| 指标 Index | 权重 Weight | 模式Ⅰ Mode Ⅰ | 模式Ⅱ Mode Ⅱ | 模式Ⅲ-A Mode Ⅲ-A | 模式Ⅲ-B Mode Ⅲ-B |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | 0.027 5 | <0.000 1 | 0.015 6 | 0.027 5 | 0.024 1 |
| X2 | 0.064 3 | 0.064 3 | 0.008 1 | 0.008 7 | <0.000 1 |
| X3 | 0.037 0 | 0.011 9 | <0.000 1 | 0.014 3 | 0.037 0 |
| X4 | 0.093 1 | 0.093 1 | 0.004 5 | 0.003 2 | <0.000 1 |
| X5 | 0.065 0 | 0.005 1 | <0.000 1 | 0.012 3 | 0.065 0 |
| X6 | 0.072 3 | 0.072 3 | 0.002 6 | 0.013 9 | <0.000 1 |
| X7 | 0.026 0 | 0.025 7 | <0.000 1 | 0.022 6 | 0.019 8 |
| X8 | 0.048 3 | 0.004 0 | <0.000 1 | 0.044 7 | 0.048 3 |
| X9 | 0.025 2 | <0.000 1 | 0.025 2 | 0.025 2 | 0.025 2 |
| X10 | 0.025 2 | 0.025 2 | <0.000 1 | 0.025 2 | 0.025 2 |
| X11 | 0.050 1 | 0.003 2 | <0.000 1 | 0.042 0 | 0.050 1 |
| X12 | 0.026 3 | 0.018 0 | <0.000 1 | 0.024 2 | 0.026 3 |
| X13 | 0.029 0 | 0.013 7 | <0.000 1 | 0.022 5 | 0.029 0 |
| X14 | 0.043 3 | 0.005 9 | <0.000 1 | 0.043 3 | 0.034 0 |
| X15 | 0.032 8 | <0.000 1 | 0.010 9 | 0.021 9 | 0.032 8 |
| X16 | 0.027 7 | 0.015 4 | <0.000 1 | 0.025 0 | 0.027 7 |
| X17 | 0.036 8 | 0.009 5 | <0.000 1 | 0.019 9 | 0.036 8 |
| X18 | 0.056 3 | 0.056 3 | 0.011 0 | <0.000 1 | 0.008 3 |
| X19 | 0.044 3 | 0.044 3 | 0.012 9 | 0.010 4 | <0.000 1 |
| X20 | 0.050 9 | 0.050 9 | 0.016 9 | 0.006 3 | <0.000 1 |
| X21 | 0.066 3 | 0.066 3 | 0.019 0 | <0.000 1 | 0.002 1 |
| X22 | 0.052 7 | 0.052 7 | 0.048 5 | 0.002 4 | <0.000 1 |
表3 不同产业融合经营模式的各指标绩效
Table 3 Performance of indicators of different business modes of rural industrial convergence
| 指标 Index | 权重 Weight | 模式Ⅰ Mode Ⅰ | 模式Ⅱ Mode Ⅱ | 模式Ⅲ-A Mode Ⅲ-A | 模式Ⅲ-B Mode Ⅲ-B |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | 0.027 5 | <0.000 1 | 0.015 6 | 0.027 5 | 0.024 1 |
| X2 | 0.064 3 | 0.064 3 | 0.008 1 | 0.008 7 | <0.000 1 |
| X3 | 0.037 0 | 0.011 9 | <0.000 1 | 0.014 3 | 0.037 0 |
| X4 | 0.093 1 | 0.093 1 | 0.004 5 | 0.003 2 | <0.000 1 |
| X5 | 0.065 0 | 0.005 1 | <0.000 1 | 0.012 3 | 0.065 0 |
| X6 | 0.072 3 | 0.072 3 | 0.002 6 | 0.013 9 | <0.000 1 |
| X7 | 0.026 0 | 0.025 7 | <0.000 1 | 0.022 6 | 0.019 8 |
| X8 | 0.048 3 | 0.004 0 | <0.000 1 | 0.044 7 | 0.048 3 |
| X9 | 0.025 2 | <0.000 1 | 0.025 2 | 0.025 2 | 0.025 2 |
| X10 | 0.025 2 | 0.025 2 | <0.000 1 | 0.025 2 | 0.025 2 |
| X11 | 0.050 1 | 0.003 2 | <0.000 1 | 0.042 0 | 0.050 1 |
| X12 | 0.026 3 | 0.018 0 | <0.000 1 | 0.024 2 | 0.026 3 |
| X13 | 0.029 0 | 0.013 7 | <0.000 1 | 0.022 5 | 0.029 0 |
| X14 | 0.043 3 | 0.005 9 | <0.000 1 | 0.043 3 | 0.034 0 |
| X15 | 0.032 8 | <0.000 1 | 0.010 9 | 0.021 9 | 0.032 8 |
| X16 | 0.027 7 | 0.015 4 | <0.000 1 | 0.025 0 | 0.027 7 |
| X17 | 0.036 8 | 0.009 5 | <0.000 1 | 0.019 9 | 0.036 8 |
| X18 | 0.056 3 | 0.056 3 | 0.011 0 | <0.000 1 | 0.008 3 |
| X19 | 0.044 3 | 0.044 3 | 0.012 9 | 0.010 4 | <0.000 1 |
| X20 | 0.050 9 | 0.050 9 | 0.016 9 | 0.006 3 | <0.000 1 |
| X21 | 0.066 3 | 0.066 3 | 0.019 0 | <0.000 1 | 0.002 1 |
| X22 | 0.052 7 | 0.052 7 | 0.048 5 | 0.002 4 | <0.000 1 |
表4 不同产业融合经营模式的各功能绩效
Table 4 Performance of functions of different business modes of rural industrial convergence
| 指标 Index | 模式Ⅰ Mode Ⅰ | 模式Ⅱ Mode Ⅱ | 模式Ⅲ-A Mode Ⅲ-A | 模式Ⅲ-B Mode Ⅲ-B | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 生产功能Production function | 过程绩效Process performance | 0.169 3 | 0.028 1 | 0.053 7 | 0.061 2 |
| 结果绩效Results performance | 0.077 5 | 0.002 6 | 0.026 2 | 0.065 0 | |
| 小计Subtotal | 0.246 8 | 0.030 7 | 0.080 0 | 0.126 1 | |
| 生态功能Ecological function | 过程绩效Process performance | 0.054 9 | 0.025 2 | 0.117 8 | 0.118 5 |
| 结果绩效Results performance | 0.034 9 | <0.000 1 | 0.088 8 | 0.105 4 | |
| 小计Subtotal | 0.089 8 | 0.025 2 | 0.206 5 | 0.223 9 | |
| 社会功能Social function | 过程绩效Process performance | 0.005 9 | 0.010 9 | 0.065 2 | 0.066 8 |
| 结果绩效Results performance | 0.024 9 | <0.000 1 | 0.044 8 | 0.064 5 | |
| 小计Subtotal | 0.030 8 | 0.0109 | 0.100 0 | 0.131 3 | |
| 休闲功能Leisure function | 过程绩效Process performance | 0.151 5 | 0.040 9 | 0.016 7 | 0.008 3 |
| 结果绩效Results performance | 0.119 0 | 0.067 5 | 0.002 4 | 0.002 1 | |
| 小计Subtotal | 0.270 5 | 0.108 4 | 0.019 0 | 0.010 4 | |
| 多功能绩效Multifunctional performance | 0.637 8 | 0.175 2 | 0.415 5 | 0.491 6 | |
| 贴近度Closeness | 0.618 4 | 0.248 1 | 0.376 6 | 0.433 1 | |
| 绩效水平Performance level | 良好Good | 较差Poor | 一般General | 一般General | |
表4 不同产业融合经营模式的各功能绩效
Table 4 Performance of functions of different business modes of rural industrial convergence
| 指标 Index | 模式Ⅰ Mode Ⅰ | 模式Ⅱ Mode Ⅱ | 模式Ⅲ-A Mode Ⅲ-A | 模式Ⅲ-B Mode Ⅲ-B | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 生产功能Production function | 过程绩效Process performance | 0.169 3 | 0.028 1 | 0.053 7 | 0.061 2 |
| 结果绩效Results performance | 0.077 5 | 0.002 6 | 0.026 2 | 0.065 0 | |
| 小计Subtotal | 0.246 8 | 0.030 7 | 0.080 0 | 0.126 1 | |
| 生态功能Ecological function | 过程绩效Process performance | 0.054 9 | 0.025 2 | 0.117 8 | 0.118 5 |
| 结果绩效Results performance | 0.034 9 | <0.000 1 | 0.088 8 | 0.105 4 | |
| 小计Subtotal | 0.089 8 | 0.025 2 | 0.206 5 | 0.223 9 | |
| 社会功能Social function | 过程绩效Process performance | 0.005 9 | 0.010 9 | 0.065 2 | 0.066 8 |
| 结果绩效Results performance | 0.024 9 | <0.000 1 | 0.044 8 | 0.064 5 | |
| 小计Subtotal | 0.030 8 | 0.0109 | 0.100 0 | 0.131 3 | |
| 休闲功能Leisure function | 过程绩效Process performance | 0.151 5 | 0.040 9 | 0.016 7 | 0.008 3 |
| 结果绩效Results performance | 0.119 0 | 0.067 5 | 0.002 4 | 0.002 1 | |
| 小计Subtotal | 0.270 5 | 0.108 4 | 0.019 0 | 0.010 4 | |
| 多功能绩效Multifunctional performance | 0.637 8 | 0.175 2 | 0.415 5 | 0.491 6 | |
| 贴近度Closeness | 0.618 4 | 0.248 1 | 0.376 6 | 0.433 1 | |
| 绩效水平Performance level | 良好Good | 较差Poor | 一般General | 一般General | |
表5 产业融合多功能绩效指标层障碍因子及其障碍度
Table 5 Obstacle factors and barriers of multifunctional performance indicators of rural industrial convergence
| 排位 Rank | 模式Ⅰ Mode Ⅰ | 模式Ⅱ Mode Ⅱ | 模式Ⅲ-A Mode Ⅲ-A | 模式Ⅲ-B Mode Ⅲ-B | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 障碍因素 Obstacle factor | 障碍度 Obstacle | 障碍因素 Obstacle factor | 障碍度 Obstacle | 障碍因素 Obstacle factor | 障碍度 Obstacle | 障碍因素 Obstacle factor | 障碍度 Obstacle | ||||
| 1 | X5 | 0.165 1 | X4 | 0.107 5 | X4 | 0.153 8 | X4 | 0.183 2 | |||
| 2 | X11 | 0.129 3 | X6 | 0.084 6 | X21 | 0.113 4 | X6 | 0.142 3 | |||
| 3 | X8 | 0.122 4 | X5 | 0.078 8 | X6 | 0.099 9 | X2 | 0.126 4 | |||
| 4 | X14 | 0.103 3 | X2 | 0.068 1 | X18 | 0.096 3 | X21 | 0.126 4 | |||
| 5 | X15 | 0.090 7 | X7 | 0.060 7 | X2 | 0.095 1 | X22 | 0.103 6 | |||
表5 产业融合多功能绩效指标层障碍因子及其障碍度
Table 5 Obstacle factors and barriers of multifunctional performance indicators of rural industrial convergence
| 排位 Rank | 模式Ⅰ Mode Ⅰ | 模式Ⅱ Mode Ⅱ | 模式Ⅲ-A Mode Ⅲ-A | 模式Ⅲ-B Mode Ⅲ-B | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 障碍因素 Obstacle factor | 障碍度 Obstacle | 障碍因素 Obstacle factor | 障碍度 Obstacle | 障碍因素 Obstacle factor | 障碍度 Obstacle | 障碍因素 Obstacle factor | 障碍度 Obstacle | ||||
| 1 | X5 | 0.165 1 | X4 | 0.107 5 | X4 | 0.153 8 | X4 | 0.183 2 | |||
| 2 | X11 | 0.129 3 | X6 | 0.084 6 | X21 | 0.113 4 | X6 | 0.142 3 | |||
| 3 | X8 | 0.122 4 | X5 | 0.078 8 | X6 | 0.099 9 | X2 | 0.126 4 | |||
| 4 | X14 | 0.103 3 | X2 | 0.068 1 | X18 | 0.096 3 | X21 | 0.126 4 | |||
| 5 | X15 | 0.090 7 | X7 | 0.060 7 | X2 | 0.095 1 | X22 | 0.103 6 | |||
| [1] |
李平星, 陈雯, 孙伟. 经济发达地区乡村地域多功能空间分异及影响因素: 以江苏省为例[J]. 地理学报, 2014,69(6):797-807.
DOI |
| LI P X, CHEN W, SUN W. Spatial differentiation and influencing factors of rural territorial multifunctions in developed regions: a case study of Jiangsu Province[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014,69(6):797-807.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [2] |
徐凯, 房艳刚. 乡村地域多功能空间分异特征及类型识别: 以辽宁省78个区县为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019,38(3):482-495.
DOI |
| XU K, FANG Y G. Spatial differentiation and type identification of rural territorial multi-functions in Liaoning Province[J]. Geographical Research, 2019,38(3):482-495.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [3] | 陈秧分, 黄修杰, 王丽娟. 多功能理论视角下的中国乡村振兴与评估[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2018,39(6):201-209. |
| CHEN Y F, HUANG X J, WANG L J. China’s rural revitalization and its evaluation from the perspective of multifunctional theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2018,39(6):201-209.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [4] | 方世敏, 王海艳. 基于系统论的农业与旅游产业融合: 一种黏性的观点[J]. 经济地理, 2018,38(12):211-218. |
| FANG S M, WANG H Y. Agriculture and tourism industry convergence based on system theory: a viewpoint of viscidity[J]. Economic Geography, 2018,38(12):211-218.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [5] | 梁树广, 马中东. 农业产业融合的关联度、路径与效应分析[J]. 经济体制改革, 2017 (6):79-84. |
| LIANG S G, MA Z D. Analysis on the correlation degree, path and effect of agricultural industry convergence[J]. Reform of Economic System, 2017 (6):79-84.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [6] | 陈学云, 程长明. 乡村振兴战略的三产融合路径: 逻辑必然与实证判定[J]. 农业经济问题, 2018,39(11):91-100. |
| CHEN X Y, CHENG C M. The route of three industries integration under the strategy of rural revitalization: logical inevitability and empirical judge[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2018,39(11):91-100.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [7] | 陈林生, 鲍鑫培. 现代都市农业背景下农业产业融合水平测度及评价研究: 以上海为例[J]. 经济问题, 2019 (12):89-95. |
| CHEN L S, BAO X P. Research on measurement and evaluation of Shanghai agricultural industry integration level under the background of modern urban agriculture[J]. On Economic Problems, 2019 (12):89-95.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [8] | 李治, 王一杰, 胡志全. 农村一、二、三产业融合评价体系的构建与评价: 以北京市为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2019,40(11):111-120. |
| LI Z, WANG Y J, HU Z Q. Construction and evaluation about convergence of primary, secondary and tertiary industries: a case study in Beijing[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2019,40(11):111-120.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [9] | 李志勇, 于萌. 旅游产业融合视角下欠发达地区经济发展路径探索[J]. 四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2014 (4):117-124. |
| LI Z Y, YU M. Modes of economic development in less developed regions from the perspective of tourism industry integration[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2014 (4):117-124.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [10] | 李治, 王东阳. 交易成本视角下农村一二三产业融合发展问题研究[J]. 中州学刊, 2017 (9):54-59. |
| LI Z, WANG D Y. Study on convergence of primary, secondary and tertiary industries from the perspective of transaction cost[J]. Academic Journal of Zhongzhou, 2017 (9):54-59.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [11] | 李玲玲, 杨坤, 杨建利. 我国农村产业融合发展的效率评价[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2018,39(10):78-85. |
| LI L L, YANG K, YANG J L. The efficiency evaluation of the convergence development of agriculture, second industry and third industry in rural area of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2018,39(10):78-85.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [12] | 徐维莉. 农业与二、三产业融合发展评价指标体系构建与验证: 以苏州市为实证[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2019,40(4):226-232. |
| XU W L. Construction and verification of evaluation index system for the integration development of agriculture and secondary and tertiary industries: a case study of Suzhou[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2019,40(4):226-232.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [13] |
ZASADA I. Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture: a review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming[J]. Land Use Policy, 2011,28(4):639-648.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
BORRELLI I P. Territorial sustainability and multifunctional agriculture: a case study[J]. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 2016,8:467-474.
DOI URL |
| [15] | 姜长云. 以农业产业化组织推进农村产业融合的经验与对策: 对山东潍坊的调查与思考[J]. 区域经济评论, 2017 (3):75-83. |
| JIANG C Y. The experience and measures of guiding the agricultural industrialization organization for promoting rural industry integration: survey and thinking of Weifang City, Shandong Province[J]. Regional Economic Review, 2017 (3):75-83.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [16] | 李灿, 张凤荣, 朱泰峰, 等. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型的土地利用绩效评价及关联分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013,29(5):217-227. |
| LI C, ZHANG F R, ZHU T F, et al. Evaluation and correlation analysis of land use performance based on entropy-weight TOPSIS method[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013,29(5):217-227.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [17] | 刘瀛弢, 毛世平. 公益性农业行业科研项目绩效及管理的考评体系研究[J]. 农业技术经济, 2010 (12):100-110. |
| LIU Y T, MAO S P. Evaluation system on the performance and management of public agricultural industry research projects[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2010 (12):100-110.(in Chinese) | |
| [18] | 文高辉, 杨钢桥, 李文静, 等. 基于农民视角的农地整理项目绩效评价及其障碍因子诊断: 以湖北省毛嘴等三个项目为例[J]. 资源科学, 2014,36(1):26-34. |
| WEN G H, YANG G Q, LI W J, et al. An evaluation of rural land consolidation projects performance and its obstacle indicators based on farmers’ perspective: a case of 3 projects in Hubei[J]. Resources Science, 2014,36(1):26-34.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [19] | 孙新章. 新中国60年来农业多功能性演变的研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2010,20(1):71-75. |
| SUN X Z. Evolution of agricultural multifunctionality since 1949[J]. China Population Resources and Environment, 2010,20(1):71-75.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [20] | 钟源, 刘黎明, 刘星, 等. 农业多功能评价与功能分区研究: 以湖南省为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2017,38(3):93-100. |
| ZHONG Y, LIU L M, LIU X, et al. Multi function evaluation and functional zoning of agriculture: a case study of Hunan Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2017,38(3):93-100.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [21] | 谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008,23(5):911-919. |
| XIE G D, ZHEN L, LU C X, et al. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008,23(5):911-919.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [22] | 陈曼, 甘臣林, 梅昀, 等. 农户生计视角下农地流转绩效评价及障碍因子诊断: 基于武汉城市圈典型农户调查[J]. 资源科学, 2019,41(8):1551-1562. |
| CHEN M, GAN C L, MEI Y, et al. Farmland transfer performance and obstacles from the perspective of farmers’ livelihood: based on rural household survey of greater Wuhan Metropolitan Area[J]. Resources Science, 2019,41(8):1551-1562.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [23] | 余亮亮, 蔡银莺. 基于农户满意度的耕地保护经济补偿政策绩效评价及障碍因子诊断[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015,30(7):1092-1103. |
| YU L L, CAI Y Y. Performance evaluation and obstacle indicator diagnoses of economic compensation for farmland protection policy based on farmers’ satisfaction[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015,30(7):1092-1103.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | 王丽英, 丁姝羽, 刘后平. 农村产业融合与农民收入增长——基于空间效应与门槛效应的实证研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(4): 761-776. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
