Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9): 1837-1848.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.09.03
• Crop Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
TIAN Xiu1(), TONG Bingli2, XIE Yuangui1,3,*(
), LIAO Xiaofeng4, WU Tingting1, LIU Jiming1
Received:
2021-12-17
Online:
2022-09-25
Published:
2022-09-30
Contact:
XIE Yuangui
CLC Number:
TIAN Xiu, TONG Bingli, XIE Yuangui, LIAO Xiaofeng, WU Tingting, LIU Jiming. Effects of rhizobacteria of Cinnamomum migao H. W. Li on medicinal active ingredients in fruit and its PICRUST function predictive analysis[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(9): 1837-1848.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.09.03
样本 Sample | pH | 有机质 Organic matter/ (g·kg-1) | 全氮 Total nitrogen/ (g·kg-1) | 全钾 Total potassium/ (g·kg-1) | 全磷 Total phosphorus/ (g·kg-1) | 碱解氮 Available nitrogen/ (mg·kg-1) | 速效磷 Available phosphorus/ (mg·kg-1) | 有效钾 Available potassium/ (mg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LD | 4.84± 0.02 de | 8.83± 0.26 a | 2.29± 0.25 a | 8.07± 0.15 f | 0.265± 0.01 a | 226.33± 7.10 c | 816.07± 0.83 a | 3.34± 0.12 c |
WM | 5.82± 0.19 c | 7.51± 0.41 b | 1.82± 0.11 a | 32.70± 0.31b | 0.175± 0.01 cde | 166.83± 15.17d | 819.70± 0.30 a | 6.06± 0.14 a |
CH | 4.94± 0.02 d | 6.34± 0.18 c | 2.15± 0.05 a | 31.27± 0.47bc | 0.178± 0.01 cd | 250.83± 7.65 bc | 320.37± 3.43 c | 3.31± 0.93 c |
ZF | 4.19± 0.01 f | 5.92± 0.03 c | 1.73± 0.19 a | 23.90± 0.46d | 0.150± 0.01 ef | 245.00± 6.06 bc | 259.67± 8.17 d | 3.41± 0.03 c |
TE | 4.80± 0.01de | 4.93± 0.63d | 2.24± 0.28a | 28.80± 1.36c | 0.140± 0.01f | 252.00± 4.04bc | 803.37± 6.56a | 4.31± 0.01 bc |
LY | 6.82± 0.01 a | 8.18± 0.15 ab | 2.47± 0.08 a | 37.50± 0.29a | 0.153± 0.01 def | 268.33± 10.17b | 818.80± 1.08 a | 4.97± 0.11 ab |
FN | 5.72± 0.03 c | 6.14± 0.25 c | 2.61± 0.25 a | 18.83± 0.23e | 0.205± 0.01 b | 246.17± 9.11 bc | 817.60± 0.30 a | 4.48± 0.10 bc |
NP | 4.56± 0.15 e | 3.73± 0.18 e | 2.24± 0.32 a | 30.17± 1.34c | 0.145± 0.01 f | 166.83± 8.41 d | 654.33± 11.62 b | 5.49± 0.06 ab |
LB | 6.11± 0.01 b | 8.19± 0.21 ab | 2.73± 0.19 a | 36.00± 0.30a | 0.192± 0.01 bc | 325.5± 2.02 a | 816.70± 0.30 a | 4.70± 0.04 bc |
Table 1 Physical and chemical properties of rhizosphere soil of C. migao
样本 Sample | pH | 有机质 Organic matter/ (g·kg-1) | 全氮 Total nitrogen/ (g·kg-1) | 全钾 Total potassium/ (g·kg-1) | 全磷 Total phosphorus/ (g·kg-1) | 碱解氮 Available nitrogen/ (mg·kg-1) | 速效磷 Available phosphorus/ (mg·kg-1) | 有效钾 Available potassium/ (mg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LD | 4.84± 0.02 de | 8.83± 0.26 a | 2.29± 0.25 a | 8.07± 0.15 f | 0.265± 0.01 a | 226.33± 7.10 c | 816.07± 0.83 a | 3.34± 0.12 c |
WM | 5.82± 0.19 c | 7.51± 0.41 b | 1.82± 0.11 a | 32.70± 0.31b | 0.175± 0.01 cde | 166.83± 15.17d | 819.70± 0.30 a | 6.06± 0.14 a |
CH | 4.94± 0.02 d | 6.34± 0.18 c | 2.15± 0.05 a | 31.27± 0.47bc | 0.178± 0.01 cd | 250.83± 7.65 bc | 320.37± 3.43 c | 3.31± 0.93 c |
ZF | 4.19± 0.01 f | 5.92± 0.03 c | 1.73± 0.19 a | 23.90± 0.46d | 0.150± 0.01 ef | 245.00± 6.06 bc | 259.67± 8.17 d | 3.41± 0.03 c |
TE | 4.80± 0.01de | 4.93± 0.63d | 2.24± 0.28a | 28.80± 1.36c | 0.140± 0.01f | 252.00± 4.04bc | 803.37± 6.56a | 4.31± 0.01 bc |
LY | 6.82± 0.01 a | 8.18± 0.15 ab | 2.47± 0.08 a | 37.50± 0.29a | 0.153± 0.01 def | 268.33± 10.17b | 818.80± 1.08 a | 4.97± 0.11 ab |
FN | 5.72± 0.03 c | 6.14± 0.25 c | 2.61± 0.25 a | 18.83± 0.23e | 0.205± 0.01 b | 246.17± 9.11 bc | 817.60± 0.30 a | 4.48± 0.10 bc |
NP | 4.56± 0.15 e | 3.73± 0.18 e | 2.24± 0.32 a | 30.17± 1.34c | 0.145± 0.01 f | 166.83± 8.41 d | 654.33± 11.62 b | 5.49± 0.06 ab |
LB | 6.11± 0.01 b | 8.19± 0.21 ab | 2.73± 0.19 a | 36.00± 0.30a | 0.192± 0.01 bc | 325.5± 2.02 a | 816.70± 0.30 a | 4.70± 0.04 bc |
Fig.1 Content of medicinal active ingredients in C. migao fruits LD, Luodian; WM, Wangmo; CH, Ceheng; ZF, Zhenfeng; TE, Tian’e; LY, Leye; FN, Funing; NP, Napo; LB, Libo. Data on the bars marked without the same lowercase letter indicated significant differences at P<0.05. The same as below.
样本 Sample | 可操作序列数 OTUs | 有效序列 Valid sequences | 香农指数 Shannon index | 辛普森指数 Simpson index | 覆盖度 Coverage/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LY | 1 199 | 35 789 | 6.052 3 | 0.007 3 | 99.19 |
CH | 1 430 | 42 882 | 6.080 1 | 0.006 2 | 99.50 |
WM | 1 052 | 30 500 | 6.315 8 | 0.003 7 | 99.40 |
LB | 1 028 | 43 272 | 5.323 5 | 0.017 9 | 99.31 |
LD | 929 | 42 058 | 5.722 1 | 0.008 9 | 99.42 |
ZF | 1 286 | 33 506 | 5.563 6 | 0.009 9 | 99.60 |
TE | 1 495 | 33 834 | 5.871 5 | 0.008 6 | 99.33 |
NP | 1 315 | 29 592 | 5.599 0 | 0.007 7 | 99.64 |
FN | 1 382 | 27 740 | 5.873 5 | 0.008 6 | 99.25 |
Table 2 Bacterial Alpha diversity of rhizosphere soil in C. migao
样本 Sample | 可操作序列数 OTUs | 有效序列 Valid sequences | 香农指数 Shannon index | 辛普森指数 Simpson index | 覆盖度 Coverage/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LY | 1 199 | 35 789 | 6.052 3 | 0.007 3 | 99.19 |
CH | 1 430 | 42 882 | 6.080 1 | 0.006 2 | 99.50 |
WM | 1 052 | 30 500 | 6.315 8 | 0.003 7 | 99.40 |
LB | 1 028 | 43 272 | 5.323 5 | 0.017 9 | 99.31 |
LD | 929 | 42 058 | 5.722 1 | 0.008 9 | 99.42 |
ZF | 1 286 | 33 506 | 5.563 6 | 0.009 9 | 99.60 |
TE | 1 495 | 33 834 | 5.871 5 | 0.008 6 | 99.33 |
NP | 1 315 | 29 592 | 5.599 0 | 0.007 7 | 99.64 |
FN | 1 382 | 27 740 | 5.873 5 | 0.008 6 | 99.25 |
Fig.5 RDA analysis and correlation heatmap between rhizosphere soil characteristics and bacteria on genus level TN means total nitrogen, AN means alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen; TK means total potassium, AK means available potassium; TP means total phosphorus, AP means available phosphorus; OM means organic matter.
Fig.8 Relative abundance distribution of functional genes based on GOC J, Translation, ribosome structure and biogenesis; Z, Cytoskeleton; N, cell motility; L, Replication, repair and recombination; F, Nucleotide transport and metabolism; G, Carbohydrate transport and metabolism; K, Transcription ; D, Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning; E, Amino acid transport and metabolism; S, Function unknown; C, Energy production and conversion; B, Chromatin structure and dynamics; A, RNA processing and modification; M, Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis; W, Extracellular structures; Q, Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism; U, Intracellular transport, secretion, and vesicular trafficking; V, Defense mechanisms; O, Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones; H, Coenzyme transport and metabolism; P, Inorganic ion transport and metabolism; Y, Nuclear structure; I, Lipid transport and metabolism; R, General functional prediction only; T, Signal transduction mechanisms. The same as below.
[1] | 赵山, 李鸿玉, 邱德文, 等. 大果木姜子资源, 生态调查: 贵州、桂北及湘黔桂接壤区[J]. 贵阳中医学院学报, 1991, 13(3): 59-61. |
ZHAO S, LI H Y, QIU D W, et al. Resources of ginger seeds of the big fruit tree, ecological survey: Guizhou, northern Guangxi and the border area of Hunan, Guizhou and Guangxi[J]. Journal of Guiyang College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 1991, 13(3): 59-61. (in Chinese) | |
[2] |
MUHAMMAD I, LUO W, SHOAIB R M, et al. Guaiane-type sesquiterpenoids from Cinnamomum migao H. W. Li: and their anti-inflammatory activities[J]. Phytochemistry, 2021, 190: 112850.
DOI URL |
[3] | 隋艳华, 邱德文, 谢春风, 等. 大果木姜子油抗实验性心律失常作用[J]. 中国中药杂志, 1998, 23(8): 47-49. |
SUI Y H, QIU D W, XIE C F, et al. Observation of antiarrhythmic effects of Cinnamomum migao H.W.Li on experimental arrhythmia[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 1998, 23(8): 47-49. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 杨燕, 胡万福. MTT法检测复方大果木姜子软胶囊抗肿瘤作用[J]. 三峡大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(S1): 15-17. |
YANG Y, HU W F. Detection of anti-tumor effect of compound Daguomujiangzi soft capsule by MTT method[J]. Journal of China Three Gorges University (Natural Sciences), 2017, 39(S1): 15-17. (in Chinese) | |
[5] |
HUANG X L, TIAN T, CHEN J Z, et al. Transcriptome analysis of Cinnamomum migao seed germination in medicinal plants of Southwest China[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2021, 21(1): 270.
DOI URL |
[6] |
KIRK J L, BEAUDETTE L A, HART M, et al. Methods of studying soil microbial diversity[J]. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2004, 58(2): 169-188.
PMID |
[7] |
BABALOLA O O. Beneficial bacteria of agricultural importance[J]. Biotechnology Letters, 2010, 32(11): 1559-1570.
DOI PMID |
[8] |
ALAWIYE T, BABALOLA O. Bacterial diversity and community structure in typical plant rhizosphere[J]. Diversity, 2019, 11(10): 179.
DOI URL |
[9] | 秦红, 李昌晓, 任庆水. 不同土地利用方式对三峡库区消落带土壤细菌和真菌多样性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(10): 3494-3504. |
QIN H, LI C X, REN Q S. Effects of different land use patterns on soil bacterial and fungal biodiversity in the hydro-fluctuation zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(10): 3494-3504. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] |
LANGE M, EISENHAUER N, SIERRA C A, et al. Plant diversity increases soil microbial activity and soil carbon storage[J]. Nature Communications, 2015, 6: 6707.
DOI PMID |
[11] | 任丽娟, 何聃, 邢鹏, 等. 湖泊水体细菌多样性及其生态功能研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2013, 21(4): 422-433. |
REN L J, HE D, XING P, et al. Bacterial diversity and ecological function in lake water bodies[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2013, 21(4): 422-433. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 杨山, 李小彬, 王汝振, 等. 氮水添加对中国北方草原土壤细菌多样性和群落结构的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(3): 739-746. |
YANG S, LI X B, WANG R Z, et al. Effects of nitrogen and water addition on soil bacterial diversity and community structure in temperate grasslands in Northern China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(3): 739-746. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 张菲, 田伟, 孙峰, 等. 丹江口库区表层浮游细菌群落组成与PICRUSt功能预测分析[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(3): 1252-1260. |
ZHANG F, TIAN W, SUN F, et al. Community structure and predictive functional analysis of surface water bacterioplankton in the Danjiangkou reservoir[J]. Environmental Science, 2019, 40(3): 1252-1260. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 马欣, 罗珠珠, 张耀全, 等. 黄土高原雨养区不同种植年限紫花苜蓿土壤细菌群落特征与生态功能预测[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(3): 54-67. |
MA X, LUO Z Z, ZHANG Y Q, et al. Distribution characteristics and ecological function predictions of soil bacterial communities in rainfed alfalfa fields on the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(3): 54-67. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 杨盼, 翟亚萍, 赵祥, 等. 丛枝菌根真菌和根瘤菌互作对苜蓿根际土壤细菌群落结构的影响及PICRUSt功能预测分析[J]. 微生物学通报, 2020, 47(11): 3868-3879. |
YANG P, ZHAI Y P, ZHAO X, et al. Effect of interaction between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Rhizobium on Medicago sativa rhizosphere soil bacterial community structure and PICRUSt functional prediction[J]. Microbiology China, 2020, 47(11): 3868-3879. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 邓茹, 陈曦, 裘丽萍, 等. 鲥(鱼侯)淀不同基质附着细菌群落结构特征及PICRUSt功能预测分析[J]. 淡水渔业, 2021, 51(2): 13-22. |
DENG R, CHEN X, QIU L P, et al. Diversity and PICRUSt function prediction of bacterial community attached to different substrates in Shihou Lake[J]. Freshwater Fisheries, 2021, 51(2): 13-22. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 阿日查, 斯木吉德, 王纯洁, 等. 内蒙古锡林郭勒冬季放牧蒙古牛肠道微生物多样性和功能预测分析[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2020, 25(10): 106-117. |
ARICHA, SIMUJIDE, WANG C J, et al. Study on gut microbiome diversity and functional prediction of grazing Mongolian cattle in winter in Xilin Gol, Inner Mongolia[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2020, 25(10): 106-117. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 梁光义, 邱德文, 魏慧芬, 等. 大果木姜子精油化学成分的研究[J]. 天然产物研究与开发, 1992, 4(2): 67-70. |
LIANG G Y, QIU D W, WEI H F, et al. Studies on chemical components of the essential oil from fruits of Cinnamomum migao H. W. Li[J]. Natural Product Research and Development, 1992, 4(2): 67-70. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. |
[20] | 张静, 张涛, 卢昱希, 等. 基于高通量测序分析牛呼吸系统疾病鼻咽微生物多样性和功能预测研究[J]. 畜牧与兽医, 2021, 53(9): 109-118. |
ZHANG J, ZHANG T, LU Y X, et al. Study on nasopharyngeal microbial diversity of cattle respiratory diseases and functional prediction based on high-throughput sequencing[J]. Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2021, 53(9): 109-118. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] |
姜伟, 白红梅, 薛国萍, 等. 基于高通量测序的设施连作果类菜根际土壤细菌群落结构和多样性分析[J]. 华北农学报, 2021, 36(4): 82-89.
DOI |
JIANG W, BAI H M, XUE G P, et al. Analysis of bacterial community structure and diversity in rhizosphere soil of different fruit vegetables in greenhouse continuous cropping on high-throughput sequencing[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2021, 36(4): 82-89. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
|
[22] |
KENNEDY A C. Bacterial diversity in agroecosystems[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 1999, 74(1/2/3): 65-76.
DOI URL |
[23] | 王甜甜, 闫冰, 陈彦君, 等. 不同生育期转基因抗虫棉根际土壤细菌群落特征[J]. 环境科学研究, 2021, 34(7): 1728-1736. |
WANG T T, YAN B, CHEN Y J, et al. Characteristics of bacterial community of rhizosphere soil of transgenic insect-resistant cotton at different growth stages[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2021, 34(7): 1728-1736. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 杨美玲, 张霞, 王绍明, 等. 基于高通量测序的裕民红花根际土壤细菌群落特征分析[J]. 微生物学通报, 2018, 45(11): 2429-2438. |
YANG M L, ZHANG X, WANG S M, et al. High throughput sequencing analysis of bacterial communities in Yumin safflower[J]. Microbiology China, 2018, 45(11): 2429-2438. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 吕东英, 李卫红, 杨玉海, 等. 多枝柽柳幼苗根际微生物数量与分布对土壤水分变化的响应[J]. 中国沙漠, 2012, 32(3): 737-743. |
LÜ D Y, LI W H, YANG Y H, et al. Response of the quantity and distribution of microorganisms in the rhizosphere of Tamarix ramosissima seedlings to soil moisture[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2012, 32(3): 737-743. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 李明, 毕江涛, 王静. 宁夏不同地区盐碱化土壤细菌群落多样性分布特征及其影响因子[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(4): 1316-1330. |
LI M, BI J T, WANG J. Bacterial community structure and key influence factors in saline soil of different sites in Ningxia[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(4): 1316-1330. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] |
BERTOLA M, FERRARINI A, VISIOLI G. Improvement of soil microbial diversity through sustainable agricultural practices and its evaluation by-omics approaches: a perspective for the environment, food quality and human safety[J]. Microorganisms, 2021, 9(7):1400.
DOI URL |
[28] | 骆畅, 刘济明, 王军才, 等. 不同磷营养条件下米槁光响应曲线模型比较分析[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2016, 47(10): 17-24. |
LUO C, LIU J M, WANG J C, et al. Comparison and analysis of fitting models of light response curve of Cinnamomum migao under different phosphorus levels[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2016, 47(10): 17-24. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 董志颖, 洪慢, 胡晗静, 等. 过量氮输入对寡营养海水细菌群落代谢潜力的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2018, 38(2): 457-466. |
DONG Z Y, HONG M, HU H J, et al. Effect of excess nitrogen loading on the metabolic potential of the bacterial community in oligotrophic coastal water[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2018, 38(2): 457-466. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] |
CHAUHAN H, BAGYARAJ D J, SELVAKUMAR G, et al. Novel plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: prospects and potential[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2015, 95: 38-53.
DOI URL |
[31] | 马剑, 黄高宝, 高亚琴, 等. 接种根瘤菌对豌豆根际细菌数量动态变化及产量的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2009, 27(6): 7-10. |
MA J, HUANG G B, GAO Y Q, et al. Effect of inoculated peas with Rhizobium on the number of pea rhizobacteria dynamic changes and yields[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2009, 27(6): 7-10. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] |
LANGILLE M G I, ZANEVELD J, CAPORASO J G, et al. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2013, 31(9): 814-821.
DOI PMID |
[33] | 孙峰, 田伟, 张菲, 等. 丹江口库区库滨带植被土壤细菌群落多样性及PICRUSt功能预测分析[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(1): 421-429. |
SUN F, TIAN W, ZHANG F, et al. Composition and predictive functional analysis of rhizosphere bacterial communities in riparian buffer strips in the Danjiangkou reservoir, China[J]. Environmental Science, 2019, 40(1): 421-429. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | SHEN Lu, LI Qinchao, TAKASHI Tanaka, TATSUYA Inamura, IRBIS Chagan. Efficiency of soil solarization on control of Chinese cabbage clubroot [J]. , 2020, 32(1): 98-107. |
[2] | CAO Ru\|qiong1, YING Di\|wen2, WANG Ya\|lin1, JIA Jin\|ping1,*. Bacterial diversity of bio\|electrode denitrification process under a low voltage [J]. , 2015, 27(5): 830-. |
[3] | HE Jie, CHEN Xian\|feng, GU Jian\|feng*. Identification of Rotylenchulus reniformis intercepted in Podocarpus macrophyllus from Japan [J]. , 2015, 27(1): 64-. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||