Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 360-369.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.02.18
• Food Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Yingping1,2(
), TANG Honggang1, LI Huanhuan1, ZHANG Jin1, CHEN Lihong1, YANG Yeshuang1,2, WANG Fulong1, CHEN Yifan1,*(
), ZHU Renjun2,*(
)
Received:2021-04-16
Online:2022-02-25
Published:2022-03-02
Contact:
CHEN Yifan,ZHU Renjun
CLC Number:
ZHANG Yingping, TANG Honggang, LI Huanhuan, ZHANG Jin, CHEN Lihong, YANG Yeshuang, WANG Fulong, CHEN Yifan, ZHU Renjun. Effect of colorant and packaging on quality of Chinese sausage during storage[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(2): 360-369.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.02.18
| 指标 Index | 包装方式 Packaging | 组别 Group | 贮藏时间Storage time/d | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | |||
| L* | 散装 | B | 56.28±0.83 Aa | 46.66±0.76 ABc | 50.17±1.76 Ab | 49.07±1.48 Abc |
| Bulk storage | N | 53.80±0.96 Ba | 47.42±0.69 Ac | 50.48±0.75 Ab | 50.67±0.61 Ab | |
| G | 53.32±0.88 Ca | 45.37±0.18 Bc | 46.73±0.61 Bbc | 48.45±1.24 Aab | ||
| F | 55.62±0.86 Aa | 43.72±0.67 Cb | 45.05±0.27 Bb | 42.22±0.65 Bc | ||
| 真空包装 | B | 56.28±0.83 Aa | 47.47±0.34 Bc | 51.62±0.62 Ab | 55.68±1.02 Aa | |
| Vacuum packaging | N | 53.80±0.96 Ba | 51.19±1.08 Ab | 47.71±0.34 Bb | 48.05±1.22 Bb | |
| G | 53.32±0.88 Ca | 46.81±0.85 Bb | 45.80±1.07 BCb | 45.69±0.63 BCb | ||
| F | 55.62±0.86 Aa | 44.09±1.08 Cb | 44.58±0.83 Cb | 44.02±1.06 Cb | ||
| a* | 散装Bulk storage | B | 12.40±0.24 Ba | 11.38±0.56 Bab | 11.12±0.58 Cb | 11.44±0.08 Cab |
| N | 14.63±0.39 Aa | 12.54±0.20 ABb | 12.17±0.09 BCb | 15.03±0.57 Aa | ||
| G | 14.55±0.43 Aa | 13.59±0.98 Aa | 13.84±0.17 Aa | 13.19±0.51 Ba | ||
| F | 15.66±0.80 Aa | 11.24±0.49 Bc | 13.09±0.73 ABb | 13.43±0.49 Bb | ||
| 真空包装 | B | 12.40±0.24 Ba | 11.17±0.43 Bb | 12.89±0.10 Ca | 12.93±0.28 Ca | |
| Vacuum packaging | N | 14.63±0.39 Aa | 14.52±0.66 Aa | 14.81±0.53 Aa | 14.90±0.20 Aa | |
| G | 14.55±0.43 Aa | 14.15±0.29 Aa | 14.21±0.23 ABa | 14.15±0.30 ABa | ||
| F | 15.66±0.80 Aa | 13.82±0.27 Ab | 13.53±0.65 BCb | 13.61±0.47 BCb | ||
| b* | 散装Bulk storage | B | 12.21±0.64 Ab | 10.29±0.40 Bc | 13.81±1.35 Bb | 17.21±0.36 Aa |
| N | 8.74±0.34 Cc | 10.83±1.09 ABb | 15.03±0.11 ABa | 16.01±0.42 Ba | ||
| G | 9.81±0.46 Bc | 12.30±0.41 Ab | 15.84±0.25 Aa | 16.66±0.43 ABa | ||
| F | 12.96±0.18 Ab | 12.27±0.77 Ab | 16.09±0.23 Aa | 16.34±0.51 ABa | ||
| 真空包装 | B | 12.21±0.64 Aab | 10.47±1.00 Ab | 12.60±0.78 Aab | 13.56±0.72 Aa | |
| Vacuum packaging | N | 8.74±0.34 Ca | 9.54±0.31 Aa | 10.16±0.70 Ba | 9.54±0.78 Ba | |
| G | 9.81±0.46 Ba | 10.13±0.62 Aa | 10.66±0.95 ABa | 10.16±0.26 Ba | ||
| F | 12.96±0.18 Aa | 10.58±0.51 Ab | 10.16±0.65 Bb | 9.97±0.41 Bb | ||
Table 1 Variation of color of Chinese sausage at different storage time under different treatments
| 指标 Index | 包装方式 Packaging | 组别 Group | 贮藏时间Storage time/d | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | |||
| L* | 散装 | B | 56.28±0.83 Aa | 46.66±0.76 ABc | 50.17±1.76 Ab | 49.07±1.48 Abc |
| Bulk storage | N | 53.80±0.96 Ba | 47.42±0.69 Ac | 50.48±0.75 Ab | 50.67±0.61 Ab | |
| G | 53.32±0.88 Ca | 45.37±0.18 Bc | 46.73±0.61 Bbc | 48.45±1.24 Aab | ||
| F | 55.62±0.86 Aa | 43.72±0.67 Cb | 45.05±0.27 Bb | 42.22±0.65 Bc | ||
| 真空包装 | B | 56.28±0.83 Aa | 47.47±0.34 Bc | 51.62±0.62 Ab | 55.68±1.02 Aa | |
| Vacuum packaging | N | 53.80±0.96 Ba | 51.19±1.08 Ab | 47.71±0.34 Bb | 48.05±1.22 Bb | |
| G | 53.32±0.88 Ca | 46.81±0.85 Bb | 45.80±1.07 BCb | 45.69±0.63 BCb | ||
| F | 55.62±0.86 Aa | 44.09±1.08 Cb | 44.58±0.83 Cb | 44.02±1.06 Cb | ||
| a* | 散装Bulk storage | B | 12.40±0.24 Ba | 11.38±0.56 Bab | 11.12±0.58 Cb | 11.44±0.08 Cab |
| N | 14.63±0.39 Aa | 12.54±0.20 ABb | 12.17±0.09 BCb | 15.03±0.57 Aa | ||
| G | 14.55±0.43 Aa | 13.59±0.98 Aa | 13.84±0.17 Aa | 13.19±0.51 Ba | ||
| F | 15.66±0.80 Aa | 11.24±0.49 Bc | 13.09±0.73 ABb | 13.43±0.49 Bb | ||
| 真空包装 | B | 12.40±0.24 Ba | 11.17±0.43 Bb | 12.89±0.10 Ca | 12.93±0.28 Ca | |
| Vacuum packaging | N | 14.63±0.39 Aa | 14.52±0.66 Aa | 14.81±0.53 Aa | 14.90±0.20 Aa | |
| G | 14.55±0.43 Aa | 14.15±0.29 Aa | 14.21±0.23 ABa | 14.15±0.30 ABa | ||
| F | 15.66±0.80 Aa | 13.82±0.27 Ab | 13.53±0.65 BCb | 13.61±0.47 BCb | ||
| b* | 散装Bulk storage | B | 12.21±0.64 Ab | 10.29±0.40 Bc | 13.81±1.35 Bb | 17.21±0.36 Aa |
| N | 8.74±0.34 Cc | 10.83±1.09 ABb | 15.03±0.11 ABa | 16.01±0.42 Ba | ||
| G | 9.81±0.46 Bc | 12.30±0.41 Ab | 15.84±0.25 Aa | 16.66±0.43 ABa | ||
| F | 12.96±0.18 Ab | 12.27±0.77 Ab | 16.09±0.23 Aa | 16.34±0.51 ABa | ||
| 真空包装 | B | 12.21±0.64 Aab | 10.47±1.00 Ab | 12.60±0.78 Aab | 13.56±0.72 Aa | |
| Vacuum packaging | N | 8.74±0.34 Ca | 9.54±0.31 Aa | 10.16±0.70 Ba | 9.54±0.78 Ba | |
| G | 9.81±0.46 Ba | 10.13±0.62 Aa | 10.66±0.95 ABa | 10.16±0.26 Ba | ||
| F | 12.96±0.18 Aa | 10.58±0.51 Ab | 10.16±0.65 Bb | 9.97±0.41 Bb | ||
Fig.1 Changes of pH value of Chinese sausage with bulk storage (a) or vacuum packaging (b) at different storage time Bars marked without the same uppercase letters indicated significant difference within groups at the same storage time at P<0.05. While, bars marked without the same lowercase letters indicated significant difference within different storage time for the same group at P<0.05. The same as below.
| 包装方式 Packaging | 组别 Group | 贮藏时间Storage time/d | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | ||
| 散装Bulk storage | B | 0.852±0.007 Ba | 0.796±0.003 Ab | 0.649±0.004 Bc | 0.608±0.001 Bd |
| N | 0.829±0.002 Ca | 0.752±0.001 Cb | 0.657±0.001 Ac | 0.594±0.002 Cd | |
| G | 0.861±0.001 Aa | 0.775±0.002 Bb | 0.638±0.001 Cc | 0.607±0.001 Bd | |
| F | 0.866±0.003 Aa | 0.795±0.004 Ab | 0.627±0.002 Dc | 0.624±0.001 Ac | |
| 真空包装 | B | 0.852±0.007 Bb | 0.863±0.003 Aa | 0.838±0.001 Bc | 0.831±0.002 Cc |
| Vacuum packaging | N | 0.829±0.002 Cc | 0.850±0.002 Ba | 0.846±0.002 Aa | 0.836±0.003 Ab |
| G | 0.861±0.001 Aa | 0.855±0.003 Bb | 0.830±0.002 Cc | 0.832±0.002 Bc | |
| F | 0.866±0.003 Aa | 0.862±0.002 Aa | 0.833±0.001 Cb | 0.835±0.002 ABb | |
Table 2 Variation of water activity (Aw) of Chinese sausage at different storage time under different treatments
| 包装方式 Packaging | 组别 Group | 贮藏时间Storage time/d | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | ||
| 散装Bulk storage | B | 0.852±0.007 Ba | 0.796±0.003 Ab | 0.649±0.004 Bc | 0.608±0.001 Bd |
| N | 0.829±0.002 Ca | 0.752±0.001 Cb | 0.657±0.001 Ac | 0.594±0.002 Cd | |
| G | 0.861±0.001 Aa | 0.775±0.002 Bb | 0.638±0.001 Cc | 0.607±0.001 Bd | |
| F | 0.866±0.003 Aa | 0.795±0.004 Ab | 0.627±0.002 Dc | 0.624±0.001 Ac | |
| 真空包装 | B | 0.852±0.007 Bb | 0.863±0.003 Aa | 0.838±0.001 Bc | 0.831±0.002 Cc |
| Vacuum packaging | N | 0.829±0.002 Cc | 0.850±0.002 Ba | 0.846±0.002 Aa | 0.836±0.003 Ab |
| G | 0.861±0.001 Aa | 0.855±0.003 Bb | 0.830±0.002 Cc | 0.832±0.002 Bc | |
| F | 0.866±0.003 Aa | 0.862±0.002 Aa | 0.833±0.001 Cb | 0.835±0.002 ABb | |
| 指标 Index | 包装方式 Packaging | 组别 Group | 贮藏时间Storage time/d | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | |||
| 硬度 | 散装 | B | 1 289.3±93.6 Ad | 2 500.8±27.7 Bc | 3 482.0±558.8 Bb | 6 022.2±604.0 Aa |
| Hardness/g | Bulk storage | N | 1 501.1±303.5 Ac | 4 592.1±734.2 Ab | 4 748.5±381.9 Ab | 8 355.7±192.5 Aa |
| G | 1 435.5±125.5 Ad | 2 592.8±189.8 Bc | 4 078.3±256.5 ABb | 8 311.0±913.2 Aa | ||
| F | 1 272.0±100.5 Ac | 2 980.2±74.1 Bbc | 3 989.3±268.1 ABb | 7 322.1±1 658.5 Aa | ||
| 真空包装 | B | 1 289.3±93.6 Aab | 1 436.7±289.6 Aab | 1 110.8±42.5 Bb | 1 654.7±105.2 Ca | |
| Vacuum packaging | N | 1 501.1±303.5 Ab | 1 646.6±78.5 Ab | 1 140.8±88.8 Bc | 2 190.7±128.8 Ba | |
| G | 1 435.5±125.5 Ab | 1 656.6±278.9 Ab | 1 445.1±162.8 ABb | 2 729.3±77.0 Aa | ||
| F | 1 272.0±100.5 Ab | 1 463.0±78.8 Ab | 1 586.7±210.1 Ab | 2 278.3±142.8 Ba | ||
| 弹性 | 散装 | B | 0.575±0.020 Ca | 0.542±0.031 Aa | 0.537±0.044 Aa | 0.453±0.021 Ab |
| Elasticity | Bulk storage | N | 0.718±0.012 Aa | 0.582±0.023 Ab | 0.578±0.017 Ab | 0.523±0.054 Ab |
| G | 0.703±0.026 Aa | 0.572±0.056 Ab | 0.555±0.025 Ab | 0.517±0.039 Ab | ||
| F | 0.619±0.002 Ba | 0.563±0.036 Aab | 0.543±0.026 Ab | 0.513±0.027 Ab | ||
| 真空包装 | B | 0.575±0.020 Cab | 0.621±0.028 BCa | 0.603±0.016 Ba | 0.524±0.032 Bb | |
| Vacuum packaging | N | 0.718±0.012 Aa | 0.688±0.029 Aab | 0.667±0.023 Abc | 0.635±0.015 Ac | |
| G | 0.703±0.026 Aa | 0.663±0.017 ABa | 0.675±0.004 Aa | 0.634±0.012 Ab | ||
| F | 0.619±0.002 Bab | 0.588±0.024 Cb | 0.658±0.022 Aa | 0.592±0.023 Ab | ||
| 咀嚼性 | 散装 | B | 387.5±25.5 Bb | 576.4±83.6 Ba | 624.2±196.2 Ba | 740.8±98.4 Ba |
| Chewiness/g | Bulk storage | N | 677.0±53.5 Ac | 1 165.8±68.4 Aab | 1 042.7±111.6 ABb | 1 355.8±87.7 Aa |
| G | 641.5±43.8 Ab | 666.1±152.1 Bb | 938.3±57.0 Bab | 1 223.2±202.7 ABa | ||
| F | 413.3±50.4 Bb | 837.1±24.8 Bab | 1 188.0±111.5 Aa | 1 385.2±475.4 Aa | ||
| 真空包装 | B | 387.5±25.6 Ba | 429.6±151.0 Ba | 405.5±4.7 Ba | 465.6±66.9 Ba | |
| Vacuum packaging | N | 677.0±53.5 Aa | 686.6±29.4 Aa | 557.5±35.9 Ab | 616.6±48.4 Aab | |
| G | 641.5±43.8 Aa | 684.4±96.8 Aa | 584.7±54.6 Aa | 662.8±75.4 Aa | ||
| F | 413.3±50.4 Bb | 483.6±29.9 ABb | 561.3±14.7 Aa | 599.4±32.1 ABa | ||
| 内聚性 | 散装 | B | 0.517±0.021 Aa | 0.363±0.052 Ab | 0.358±0.012 Bb | 0.312±0.031 Ab |
| Cohesiveness | Bulk storage | N | 0.600±0.029 Aa | 0.420±0.041 Ab | 0.415±0.030 Ab | 0.342±0.012 Ac |
| G | 0.532±0.119 Aa | 0.428±0.043 Aab | 0.374±0.006 ABb | 0.319±0.023 Ab | ||
| F | 0.523±0.022 Aa | 0.421±0.014 Ab | 0.357±0.021 Bc | 0.311±0.014 Ad | ||
| 真空包装 | B | 0.517±0.021 Aab | 0.518±0.019 Bab | 0.559±0.007 Ba | 0.474±0.023 Bb | |
| Vacuum packaging | N | 0.600±0.029 Aab | 0.568±0.022 Abc | 0.642±0.023 Aa | 0.536±0.014 Ac | |
| G | 0.532±0.119 Aa | 0.569±0.016 Aa | 0.600±0.025 Ba | 0.523±0.010 Ab | ||
| F | 0.523±0.022 Abc | 0.558±0.016 ABab | 0.573±0.005 Ba | 0.511±0.014 Ac | ||
| 回复性 | 散装 | B | 0.186±0.005 Ba | 0.134±0.014 Ab | 0.144±0.007 Aab | 0.099±0.034 Ab |
| Resilience | Bulk storage | N | 0.233±0.004 Aa | 0.133±0.005 Ab | 0.142±0.004 Ab | 0.133±0.014 Ab |
| G | 0.201±0.013 Ba | 0.150±0.023 Ab | 0.153±0.008 Ab | 0.131±0.012 Ab | ||
| F | 0.198±0.005 Ba | 0.145±0.008 Ab | 0.139±0.012 Ab | 0.100±0.019 Ac | ||
| 真空包装 | B | 0.186±0.005 Bb | 0.184±0.017 Bb | 0.221±0.015 ABa | 0.160±0.009 Ab | |
| Vacuum packaging | N | 0.233±0.004 Aa | 0.197±0.014 Ab | 0.227±0.007 Aa | 0.183±0.008 Ab | |
| G | 0.201±0.013 Ba | 0.209±0.003 Aa | 0.212±0.003 ABa | 0.170±0.007 Ab | ||
| F | 0.198±0.005 Ba | 0.173±0.023 Ba | 0.199±0.013 Ba | 0.163±0.018 Aa | ||
Table 3 Variation of texture characteristics of Chinese sausage at different storage time under different treatments
| 指标 Index | 包装方式 Packaging | 组别 Group | 贮藏时间Storage time/d | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | |||
| 硬度 | 散装 | B | 1 289.3±93.6 Ad | 2 500.8±27.7 Bc | 3 482.0±558.8 Bb | 6 022.2±604.0 Aa |
| Hardness/g | Bulk storage | N | 1 501.1±303.5 Ac | 4 592.1±734.2 Ab | 4 748.5±381.9 Ab | 8 355.7±192.5 Aa |
| G | 1 435.5±125.5 Ad | 2 592.8±189.8 Bc | 4 078.3±256.5 ABb | 8 311.0±913.2 Aa | ||
| F | 1 272.0±100.5 Ac | 2 980.2±74.1 Bbc | 3 989.3±268.1 ABb | 7 322.1±1 658.5 Aa | ||
| 真空包装 | B | 1 289.3±93.6 Aab | 1 436.7±289.6 Aab | 1 110.8±42.5 Bb | 1 654.7±105.2 Ca | |
| Vacuum packaging | N | 1 501.1±303.5 Ab | 1 646.6±78.5 Ab | 1 140.8±88.8 Bc | 2 190.7±128.8 Ba | |
| G | 1 435.5±125.5 Ab | 1 656.6±278.9 Ab | 1 445.1±162.8 ABb | 2 729.3±77.0 Aa | ||
| F | 1 272.0±100.5 Ab | 1 463.0±78.8 Ab | 1 586.7±210.1 Ab | 2 278.3±142.8 Ba | ||
| 弹性 | 散装 | B | 0.575±0.020 Ca | 0.542±0.031 Aa | 0.537±0.044 Aa | 0.453±0.021 Ab |
| Elasticity | Bulk storage | N | 0.718±0.012 Aa | 0.582±0.023 Ab | 0.578±0.017 Ab | 0.523±0.054 Ab |
| G | 0.703±0.026 Aa | 0.572±0.056 Ab | 0.555±0.025 Ab | 0.517±0.039 Ab | ||
| F | 0.619±0.002 Ba | 0.563±0.036 Aab | 0.543±0.026 Ab | 0.513±0.027 Ab | ||
| 真空包装 | B | 0.575±0.020 Cab | 0.621±0.028 BCa | 0.603±0.016 Ba | 0.524±0.032 Bb | |
| Vacuum packaging | N | 0.718±0.012 Aa | 0.688±0.029 Aab | 0.667±0.023 Abc | 0.635±0.015 Ac | |
| G | 0.703±0.026 Aa | 0.663±0.017 ABa | 0.675±0.004 Aa | 0.634±0.012 Ab | ||
| F | 0.619±0.002 Bab | 0.588±0.024 Cb | 0.658±0.022 Aa | 0.592±0.023 Ab | ||
| 咀嚼性 | 散装 | B | 387.5±25.5 Bb | 576.4±83.6 Ba | 624.2±196.2 Ba | 740.8±98.4 Ba |
| Chewiness/g | Bulk storage | N | 677.0±53.5 Ac | 1 165.8±68.4 Aab | 1 042.7±111.6 ABb | 1 355.8±87.7 Aa |
| G | 641.5±43.8 Ab | 666.1±152.1 Bb | 938.3±57.0 Bab | 1 223.2±202.7 ABa | ||
| F | 413.3±50.4 Bb | 837.1±24.8 Bab | 1 188.0±111.5 Aa | 1 385.2±475.4 Aa | ||
| 真空包装 | B | 387.5±25.6 Ba | 429.6±151.0 Ba | 405.5±4.7 Ba | 465.6±66.9 Ba | |
| Vacuum packaging | N | 677.0±53.5 Aa | 686.6±29.4 Aa | 557.5±35.9 Ab | 616.6±48.4 Aab | |
| G | 641.5±43.8 Aa | 684.4±96.8 Aa | 584.7±54.6 Aa | 662.8±75.4 Aa | ||
| F | 413.3±50.4 Bb | 483.6±29.9 ABb | 561.3±14.7 Aa | 599.4±32.1 ABa | ||
| 内聚性 | 散装 | B | 0.517±0.021 Aa | 0.363±0.052 Ab | 0.358±0.012 Bb | 0.312±0.031 Ab |
| Cohesiveness | Bulk storage | N | 0.600±0.029 Aa | 0.420±0.041 Ab | 0.415±0.030 Ab | 0.342±0.012 Ac |
| G | 0.532±0.119 Aa | 0.428±0.043 Aab | 0.374±0.006 ABb | 0.319±0.023 Ab | ||
| F | 0.523±0.022 Aa | 0.421±0.014 Ab | 0.357±0.021 Bc | 0.311±0.014 Ad | ||
| 真空包装 | B | 0.517±0.021 Aab | 0.518±0.019 Bab | 0.559±0.007 Ba | 0.474±0.023 Bb | |
| Vacuum packaging | N | 0.600±0.029 Aab | 0.568±0.022 Abc | 0.642±0.023 Aa | 0.536±0.014 Ac | |
| G | 0.532±0.119 Aa | 0.569±0.016 Aa | 0.600±0.025 Ba | 0.523±0.010 Ab | ||
| F | 0.523±0.022 Abc | 0.558±0.016 ABab | 0.573±0.005 Ba | 0.511±0.014 Ac | ||
| 回复性 | 散装 | B | 0.186±0.005 Ba | 0.134±0.014 Ab | 0.144±0.007 Aab | 0.099±0.034 Ab |
| Resilience | Bulk storage | N | 0.233±0.004 Aa | 0.133±0.005 Ab | 0.142±0.004 Ab | 0.133±0.014 Ab |
| G | 0.201±0.013 Ba | 0.150±0.023 Ab | 0.153±0.008 Ab | 0.131±0.012 Ab | ||
| F | 0.198±0.005 Ba | 0.145±0.008 Ab | 0.139±0.012 Ab | 0.100±0.019 Ac | ||
| 真空包装 | B | 0.186±0.005 Bb | 0.184±0.017 Bb | 0.221±0.015 ABa | 0.160±0.009 Ab | |
| Vacuum packaging | N | 0.233±0.004 Aa | 0.197±0.014 Ab | 0.227±0.007 Aa | 0.183±0.008 Ab | |
| G | 0.201±0.013 Ba | 0.209±0.003 Aa | 0.212±0.003 ABa | 0.170±0.007 Ab | ||
| F | 0.198±0.005 Ba | 0.173±0.023 Ba | 0.199±0.013 Ba | 0.163±0.018 Aa | ||
| [1] | 周星辰, 王卫, 吉莉莉, 等. 传统腌腊制品及其安全性控制研究进展[J]. 食品与发酵科技, 2020, 56(6):87-91. |
| ZHOU X C, WANG W, JI L L, et al. Research progress on traditional cured products and their safety control[J]. Food and Fermentation Sciences & Technology, 2020, 56(6):87-91.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [2] | 于海, 秦春君, 葛庆丰, 等. 中式香肠加工及贮藏中脂肪氧化对其品质特性的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2012, 33(13):119-125. |
|
YU H, QIN C J, GE Q F, et al. Effect of lipid oxidation on Chinese sausage quality during processing and storage[J]. Food Science, 2012, 33(13):119-125.(in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
|
| [3] |
NAVARRO J L, NADAL M I, NIETO P, et al. Effect of nitrate and nitrite curing salts on the generation and oxidation of fatty acids in non-fermented sausages[J]. European Food Research and Technology, 2001, 212(4):421-425.
DOI URL |
| [4] | 娄学飞, 陈晨. 磷酸盐、亚硝酸盐在肉制品中的使用现状[J]. 食品安全导刊, 2017(9):83-84. |
| LOU X F, CHEN C. Application status of phosphate and nitrite in meat products[J]. China Food Safety Magazine, 2017(9):83-84.(in Chinese) | |
| [5] | 王玲. 畜禽血液的开发利用与研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医杂志, 2018, 37(5):42-43. |
| WANG L. Research progress and development and utilization of livestock and poultry blood[J]. Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2018, 37(5):42-43.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [6] |
EYILER E, OZTAN A. Production of frankfurters with tomato powder as a natural additive[J]. LWT: Food Science and Technology, 2011, 44(1):307-311.
DOI URL |
| [7] |
YU X, WU H Z, ZHANG J H. Effect of Monascus as a nitrite substitute on color, lipid oxidation, and proteolysis of fermented meat mince[J]. Food Science and Biotechnology, 2015, 24(2):575-581.
DOI URL |
| [8] | 刘方菁, 刘辉, 宁娜. 红曲色素替代亚硝酸盐对肉类护色的研究进展[J]. 肉类研究, 2011, 25(1):33-36. |
| LIU F J, LIU H, NING N. Research progress of manascus pigment substitute for nitrite in meat color protection[J]. Meat Research, 2011, 25(1):33-36.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [9] | 徐海祥, 邵欢欢, 施帅. Nisin替代部分亚硝对中式香肠品质影响的研究[J]. 肉类工业, 2012(9):38-41. |
| XU H X, SHAO H H, SHI S. Study on effect of Nisin on Chinese sausage quality[J]. Meat Industry, 2012(9):38-41.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [10] |
VARELTZIS K, BUCK E M, LABBE R G. Effectiveness of a betalains/potassium sorbate system versus sodium nitrite for color development and control of total aerobes, Clostridium perfringens and Clostridium sporogenes in chicken frankfurters[J]. Journal of Food Protection, 1984, 47(7):532-536.
DOI URL |
| [11] | 郭卓钊, 潘丽娟, 郭美媛, 等. 肉制品发色剂研究进展[J]. 农产品加工, 2020(1):90-93. |
| GUO Z Z, PAN L J, GUO M Y, et al. Research progress on meat coloring agents[J]. Farm Products Processing, 2020(1):90-93.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [12] | 徐梅, 黄攀, 陈从贵, 等. 低盐肉制品贮藏特性研究进展[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2019, 40(16):192-197. |
| XU M, HUANG P, CHEN C G, et al. Research progress on the storage properties of low-salt meat products: a review[J]. Food Research and Development, 2019, 40(16):192-197.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [13] | 李林. 改进型城口腊肉品质变化规律与方便产品的开发[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2016. |
| LI L. Research on the quality change of modified Chongqing bacon and the development of instant bacon products[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [14] | 傅樱花, 马长伟. 腊肉加工过程中脂质分解及氧化的研究[J]. 食品科技, 2004, 29(1):42-44. |
| FU Y H, MA C W. Study on lipolysis and oxidation during the processing of Chinese bacon[J]. Food Science and Technology, 2004, 29(1):42-44. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [15] | 罗玉龙, 靳烨, 靳志敏, 等. 不同包装条件对羊肉发酵香肠品质特性的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2015, 36(18):252-256. |
| LUO Y L, JIN Y, JIN Z M, et al. Effects of different packaging methods on the quality characteristics of fermented mutton sausage[J]. Food Science, 2015, 36(18):252-256.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [16] |
ANDRÉS S C, GARCÍ A M E, ZARITZKY N E, et al. Storage stability of low-fat chicken sausages[J]. Journal of Food Engineering, 2006, 72(4):311-319.
DOI URL |
| [17] | 安攀宇, 陈韬. 复配天然抗氧化剂在川味香肠中的应用[J]. 肉类研究, 2012, 26(2):37-42. |
| AN P Y, CHEN T. Application of formulated natural antioxidants in Sichuan style sausage[J]. Meat Research, 2012, 26(2):37-42.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [18] | 朱培培. 红叶甜菜和糖基化酰基血红蛋白对中式香肠品质的影响研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2017. |
| ZHU P P. Effects of red beet and glycosylated hemoglobin on the quality of Chinese sausages[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [19] | 肖朝耿, 谭芦兰, 朱培培, 等. 糖基化酰基血红蛋白与甜菜粉对中式香肠品质的影响[J]. 中国食品学报, 2019, 19(4):161-168. |
| XIAO C G, TAN L L, ZHU P P, et al. Effect of glycosylated acyl hemoglobin and beet powder on the quality of Chinese sausage[J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2019, 19(4):161-168.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [20] | 潘晓倩, 成晓瑜, 张顺亮, 等. 不同发酵剂对北方风干香肠色泽和风味品质的改良作用[J]. 食品科学, 2015, 36(14):81-86. |
|
PAN X Q, CHENG X Y, ZHANG S L, et al. Analysis of color and flavor improvement of different starter cultures on northern air-dried sausage[J]. Food Science, 2015, 36(14):81-86.(in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
|
| [21] | 李小妮, 于立梅, 曾晓房, 等. 干酪乳杆菌和植物乳杆菌对广式腊肠品质的影响[J]. 中国调味品, 2020, 45(8):31-34. |
| LI X N, YU L M, ZENG X F, et al. Effects of Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus plantarum on the quality of Cantonese sausage[J]. China Condiment, 2020, 45(8):31-34.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [22] | 师萱, 陈娅, 符宜谊, 等. 色差计在食品品质检测中的应用[J]. 食品工业科技, 2009, 30(5):373-375. |
| SHI X, CHEN Y, FU Y Y, et al. Application of color difference meter in the quality inspection of food[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2009, 30(5):373-375.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [23] | 王军工, 徐志强, 朱英莲. 番茄红素对发酵香肠色度、亚硝基肌红蛋白形成及抗氧化特性的影响[J]. 食品科技, 2021, 46(9):130-135. |
| WANG J G, XU Z Q, ZHU Y L. Effect of lycopene on color, nitrosomyoglobin formation, and antioxidant properties of fermented sausage[J]. Food Science and Technology, 2021, 46(9):130-135.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [24] | 刘鹏雪, 刘昊天, 张欢, 等. 糖基化亚硝基血红蛋白部分替代亚硝酸钠对哈尔滨风干肠质量的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2019, 40(16):45-51. |
| LIU P X, LIU H T, ZHANG H, et al. Effect of partial substitution of sodium nitrite with glycosylated nitrosohaemoglobin on quality of Harbin air-dried sausage[J]. Food Science, 2019, 40(16):45-51.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [25] | 刘浩, 戴意强, 吴叶, 等. 发酵剂种类对羊肉香肠理化性质的影响[J]. 中国调味品, 2019, 44(1):82-84. |
| LIU H, DAI Y Q, WU Y, et al. Effect of starter types on physicochemical properties of mutton sausage[J]. China Condiment, 2019, 44(1):82-84. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [26] | 马汉军, 周光宏, 余小领, 等. 中式发酵香肠pH与Aw的关系及其对产品风味的影响[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2009, 30(1):87-91. |
| MA H J, ZHOU G H, YU X L, et al. The relationship between pH and Aw and its effects on the flavor of Chinese-style fermented sausage[J]. Food Research and Development, 2009, 30(1):87-91.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [27] | 宋忠祥, 夏延斌, 付浩华, 等. 异抗坏血酸钠在肉制品中的应用研究[J]. 农产品加工(学刊), 2014(1):76-78. |
| SONG Z X, XIA Y B, FU H H, et al. Application of sodium erythorbate in meat products[J]. Academic Periodical of Farm Products Processing, 2014(1):76-78.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [28] | 马雪玲. 影响传统腊肠氧化变质因素及控制措施研究[D]. 晋中: 山西农业大学, 2014. |
| MA X L. Study on factors affecting oxidation and deterioration of traditional sausage and control measures[D]. Jinzhong: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2014. (in Chinese) | |
| [29] |
KOUTSOUMANIS K P, KENDALL P A, SOFOS J N. A comparative study on growth limits of Listeria monocytogenes as affected by temperature, pH and Aw when grown in suspension or on a solid surface[J]. Food Microbiology, 2004, 21(4):415-422.
DOI URL |
| [30] | 谢爱英, 张富新, 陈颖. 发酵香肠的pH值、水分含量与水分活度(Aw)的关系及其对制品贮藏性的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2004, 30(11):143-146. |
| XIE A Y, ZHANG F X, CHEN Y. Quality of fermented sausage during storage: relationship of pH, water content and water activity[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2004, 30(11):143-146.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [31] | 江登珍, 李敏, 康莉, 等. 食品质构评定方法的研究进展[J]. 现代食品, 2019(7):99-103. |
| JIANG D Z, LI M, KANG L, et al. Research progress of food texture assessment methods[J]. Modern Food, 2019(7):99-103.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [32] | 樊路杰, 窦鸣乐, 王小宇, 等. 宰后肌肉抗氧化能力与肉品质的关系[J]. 动物营养学报, 2018, 30(5):1676-1680. |
| FAN L J, DOU M L, WANG X Y, et al. Relationship between antioxidant capacity of postmortem muscle and meat quality[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2018, 30(5):1676-1680.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [33] |
CHEN Q, KONG B H, HAN Q, et al. The role of bacterial fermentation in lipolysis and lipid oxidation in Harbin dry sausages and its flavour development[J]. LWT, 2017, 77:389-396.
DOI URL |
| [34] | 程伟, 杨清香, 张志强. 新疆烤肉加工过程中过氧化值及酸价测定[J]. 肉类工业, 2015(6):48-49. |
| CHENG W, YANG Q X, ZHANG Z Q. Determination of peroxide value and acid value during processing of Xinjiang barbecue[J]. Meat Industry, 2015(6):48-49. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [35] | 王婷. 鸡肉热处理后肌内脂质氧化及影响因素的研究[D]. 南京: 南京师范大学, 2019. |
| WANG T. Study on intramuscular lipid oxidation and its influencing factors of chicken after heat treatment[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Normal University, 2019. | |
| [36] |
ANSORENA D, ASTIASARÁN I. Effect of storage and packaging on fatty acid composition and oxidation in dry fermented sausages made with added olive oil and antioxidants[J]. Meat Science, 2004, 67(2):237-244.
DOI URL |
| [37] | 李彦虎, 贠建民, 牛耀星, 等. 传统腌腊肉制品中微生物多样性及其功能研究进展[J]. 包装与食品机械, 2020, 38(2):52-58. |
| LI Y H, YUN J M, NIU Y X, et al. Research progress of microbial diversity and functions in traditional cured meat product[J]. Packaging and Food Machinery, 2020, 38(2):52-58.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | XU Weimeng, XU Yan, CHEN Guoli. Comprehensive evaluation of waxy corn quality based on various analytical methods [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(9): 1840-1848. |
| [2] | ZHU Weijing, WU Jia, HONG Chunlai, ZHU Fengxiang, HONG Leidong, ZHANG Tao, ZHANG Shuo, ZHU Huifen. Effects of straw mulching on water, heat, fertility status of soil and yield and quality of flat peach [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(9): 1924-1932. |
| [3] | HE Shixiong, YANG Lei, QI Anmin, CHENG Ji, WANG Min, LI Yingkui, HONG Lin. Effects of interstock on leaf photosynthetic characteristics, physicochemical properties and fruit quality of three mandarin hybrids [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(8): 1680-1693. |
| [4] | ZHANG Shunchang, XU Jigen, FU Chengyue, PU Zhanxu, HU Lipeng, WU Hao, LI Junbing, XIN Liang, LEI Yuanjun. Effect of amino acid calcium spraying on peel cracking and quality of citrus hybrid Hongmeiren [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(8): 1706-1715. |
| [5] | YAN Fulin, LANG Yunhu, JIAN Yingquan, CHEN Xiongfei, WEI Wei, WANG Zhiwei, AN Jiangyong, REN Deqiang, DING Ning, WEI Shenghua. Response of yield and quality of Radix Ardisia to soil physiochemical properties [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(8): 1766-1775. |
| [6] | FENG Yiyu, REN Hongjie. Quantitative assessment of new quality productive forces in China’s livestock industry: based on panel data in 2007-2021 [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(8): 1805-1816. |
| [7] | HUANG Xianke, HUANG Xiaolin, ZHANG Xiang, LI Min, CAI Yilong, CHEN Ran. Effects of oyster shells on the growth performance of Penaeus vannamei and water quality, and microbial community characteristics on shell surfaces [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(7): 1441-1450. |
| [8] | WANG Chengyang, LIU Jieya, WU Minyi, XIE Boyi, HONG Decheng, LENG Feng, WU Guoquan. Effect of calcium treatment on the fruit quality of Reliance grape under waterlogging [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(7): 1451-1458. |
| [9] | ZHOU Hang, JIA Tao, FANG Jiangping, YANG Yongfeng, YU Yangyang, QIU Yao, CHEN Siyuan, FENG Wei, ZHANG Jingyuan, CHEN Hongli. Study on screening, identification, culture optimization, and biocontrol effects of antagonistic bacteria against tobacco leaf mildew [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(7): 1481-1491. |
| [10] | ZHANG Yuanyuan, LI Meng. The estimation of new quality productive forces level, developmental retardation and cultivation path of feed enterprises [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(7): 1580-1594. |
| [11] | ZHANG Ruonan, MEN Xiaoming, QIN Kaipeng, WANG Binbin, WU Jie, DING Xiangbin, XU Ziwei, QI Keke. Comparative study on growth performance, carcass quality, meat performance and profitability of different crossbreed combinations of Lvjiahei pigs [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(6): 1203-1211. |
| [12] | XIANG Ying, CONG Jianmin, PAN Danhong, TAO Yonggang. Comprehensive evaluation of the growth process of different tomato varieties under spring organic greenhouse planting [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(6): 1252-1261. |
| [13] | LIU Wenqi, HU Qizan, YUE Zhichen, TAO Peng, LEI Juanli, LI Biyuan, ZHAO Yanting, WANG Huasen. Effects of high temperature in summer on the appearance and nutritional quality of Brassica juncea [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(6): 1262-1271. |
| [14] | ZHANG Chengcheng, FAN Tao, ZHANG Jianming, ZHAO Fengliang, XIN Xiaoting, NIU Haiyue, LIU Daqun. Changes of bacterial community and quality during pickling process of Jinyun pickled and dried mustard [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(6): 1336-1343. |
| [15] | YUE Li, ZHUANG Hongmei, ZULIPIYA· Maimaiti, WANG Jiamin, MAO Hongyan, ZHANG Yingxian, NIGARY· Yadikar, YU Ming. Comprehensive evaluation of the texture quality of turnip succulent root based on principal component analysis and cluster analysis [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(5): 1057-1071. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||