Government propaganda, consumer awareness and satisfaction with quality and safety of agricultural products: based on survey data from 18 districts and counties in Zhejiang Province, China

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240016

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 2635-2646.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240016

• Agricultural Economy and Development • Previous Articles Next Articles

Government propaganda, consumer awareness and satisfaction with quality and safety of agricultural products: based on survey data from 18 districts and counties in Zhejiang Province, China

YU Jiajie(), KE Fuyan(), XU Zhiyuan

Institute of Rural Development, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China

Received:2023-12-29 Online:2024-11-25 Published:2024-11-27

Abstract

Abstract:

Improving consumers’ satisfaction with the quality and safety of agricultural products is one of the important goals of the government’s agricultural product quality and safety work. Based on 3 060 consumer survey data from 18 districts and counties in Zhejiang Province, this article uses the Oprobit model to explore the impact of government propaganda on consumer satisfaction with the quality and safety of agricultural products and its mechanism. The study found that government propaganda significantly improved consumer satisfaction with the quality and safety of agricultural products. Mechanism analysis shows that consumers’ awareness of agricultural product quality and safety plays a mediating effect on the impact of government propaganda on agricultural product quality and safety satisfaction. The heterogeneity study found that government propaganda played a more effective role in the young group and the highly educated group. To this end, it is recommended to increase publicity on the quality and safety of agricultural products and improve the pertinence of the publicity, thereby improving consumers’ satisfaction with the quality and safety of agricultural products.

Key words: government propaganda, consumer cognition, quality and safety of agricultural products, satisfaction

CLC Number:

F322.3

YU Jiajie, KE Fuyan, XU Zhiyuan. Government propaganda, consumer awareness and satisfaction with quality and safety of agricultural products: based on survey data from 18 districts and counties in Zhejiang Province, China[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(11): 2635-2646.

Figures/Tables 7

References 30

[1]	聂文静, 李太平, 华树春. 消费者对生鲜农产品质量属性的偏好及影响因素分析: 苹果的案例[J]. 农业技术经济, 2016(9): 60-71.
	NIE W J, LI T P, HUA S C. Analysis of consumers’ preference for quality attributes of fresh agricultural products and its influencing factors: the case of apple[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2016(9): 60-71. (in Chinese)
[2]	杨鸿雁, 周芬芬, 田英杰. 基于关联规则的消费者食品安全满意度研究[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(4): 286-297.
	YANG H Y, ZHOU F F, TIAN Y J. Study on consumers’ food safety satisfaction based on association rule[J]. Management Review, 2020, 32(4): 286-297. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	瞿晗屹, 张吟, 彭亚拉. 农业源头污染对我国农产品质量安全的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2012, 33(17): 331-335.
	QU H Y, ZHANG Y, PENG Y L. Influence of agricultural non-point source pollution on the quality and safety of agricultural products[J]. Food Science, 2012, 33(17): 331-335. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	朱红霞, 赵红艳, 陈丽丽, 等. 铅镉胁迫下马齿苋的种子萌发和幼苗生理响应[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2020, 40(3): 76-81.
	ZHU H X, ZHAO H Y, CHEN L L, et al. Response of Pb and Cd on seed germination and seedling physiologica of Portulaca oleracea[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University(Natural Sciences), 2020, 40(3): 76-81. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	赵明, 蔡葵, 孙永红, 等. 不同施肥处理对番茄产量品质及土壤有效态重金属含量的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2010, 29(6): 1072-1078.
	ZHAO M, CAI K, SUN Y H, et al. Influence of organic and chemical fertilizers on tomato yield, quality, and the content of available heavy metals in soil[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2010, 29(6): 1072-1078. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	古川, 易钰杰. 获取披露信息能提高食品信任水平吗: 基于湖南省长沙市生鲜品信息公示的调查数据[J]. 农业技术经济, 2020(1): 68-79.
	GU C, YI Y J. Can disclosed information acquisition improve food trust?: based on survey data of fresh food in Changsha City[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2020(1): 68-79. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	YEUNG R M W, MORRIS J. Food safety risk[J]. British Food Journal, 2001, 103(3): 170-187.
[8]	王建华, 李佳敏. 信息不对称下消费者对安全认证农产品的认知、情感与意愿研究: 基于华东地区12市的实证研究[J]. 世界农业, 2021(12): 94-106.
	WANG J H, LI J M. Research on consumers’ cognition, emotion and willingness to safety certified agricultural products under information asymmetry: an empirical study based on 12 cities in East China[J]. World Agriculture, 2021(12): 94-106. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	张莹, 张肇中. 省域居民食品安全满意度及其监管体系催生[J]. 改革, 2016(12): 65-74.
	ZHANG Y, ZHANG Z Z. Food safety satisfaction of provincial residents and its regulatory system[J]. Reform, 2016(12): 65-74. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	马凤才, 李春月. 消费者对电子商务平台销售生鲜产品满意度测算研究: 基于京东生鲜在线评论的分析[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2020(5): 117-120.
	MA F C, LI C Y. Research on E-commerce consumer satisfaction measurement of fresh products: analysis based on online reviews of JD fresh[J]. Price(Theory & Practice), 2020(5): 117-120. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	张守莉, 王启魁, 王志刚. 国产液态奶质量安全消费者满意度研究: 基于北京、长沙、成都三地城市消费者的问卷调查[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2017, 53(2): 157-163.
	ZHANG S L, WANG Q K, WANG Z G. Liquid milk: a survey of consumers in Beijing, Changsha and Chengdu[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2017, 53(2): 157-163. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	刘新超, 樊林峰, 王启魁, 等. 消费者对大米质量安全的满意度测算: 基于北京、长沙和成都三地的问卷调查[J]. 农林经济管理学报, 2015, 14(3): 243-251.
	LIU X C, FAN L F, WANG Q K, et al. Measuring consumer satisfaction of rice quality: based on investigations conducted in Beijing, Changsha and Chengdu[J]. Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management, 2015, 14(3): 243-251. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	陈长珍, 郑爱新, 毛丹, 等. 杭州市2015年餐饮服务食品安全公众满意度调查[J]. 卫生软科学, 2017, 31(3): 49-53.
	CHEN C Z, ZHENG A X, MAO D, et al. Investigation on public satisfaction degree of catering service food safety in 2015 in Hangzhou[J]. Soft Science of Health, 2017, 31(3): 49-53. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	张红凤, 李萍, 王超. 食品安全满意度的影响因素研究: 基于多层线性回归模型及Easterlin悖论的验证[J]. 经济与管理评论, 2021, 37(3): 98-110.
	ZHANG H F, LI P, WANG C. A study of influencing factors of food safety satisfaction: based on HLM and the verification of easterlin paradox[J]. Review of Economy and Management, 2021, 37(3): 98-110. (in Chinese)
[15]	周应恒, 卓佳. 消费者食品安全风险认知研究: 基于三聚氰胺事件下南京消费者的调查[J]. 农业技术经济, 2010(2): 89-96.
	ZHOU Y H, ZHUO J. Study on consumers’ cognition of food safety risk: based on the investigation of Nanjing consumers under the melamine incident[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2010(2): 89-96. (in Chinese)
[16]	王建华, 葛佳烨, 刘茁. 民众感知、政府行为及监管评价研究: 基于食品安全满意度的视角[J]. 软科学, 2016, 30(1): 36-40.
	WANG J H, GE J Y, LIU Z. Public perception, government actions and regulatory evaluation: based on the perspective of food safety satisfaction[J]. Soft Science, 2016, 30(1): 36-40. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	郑志浩. 信息对消费者行为的影响: 以转基因大米为例[J]. 世界经济, 2015, 38(9): 144-165.
	ZHENG Z H. The influence of information on consumer behavior: a case study of transgenic rice[J]. The Journal of World Economy, 2015, 38(9): 144-165. (in Chinese)
[18]	吴静茹, 韩丹, 阮荣平. 农业信息化与农产品质量: 基于家庭农场农产品质量安全认证行为的分析[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 22(1): 172-184.
	WU J R, HAN D, RUAN R P. Agriculture informatization and quality of agricultural products: analysis on the behavior of quality certification of agricultural products based on family farms[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 22(1): 172-184. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	刘成, 方向明. 我国城镇居民对农产品质量安全信息的偏好及支付意愿研究[J]. 当代财经, 2018(7): 35-45.
	LIU C, FANG X M. A study of the Chinese urban residents’ preference for the quality-safety information of agricultural products and their willingness to pay[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2018(7): 35-45. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	王志刚, 孙云曼, 杨胤轩, 等. 媒体对消费者食品安全消费的导向作用分析[J]. 农产品质量与安全, 2013(5): 69-73.
	WANG Z G, SUN Y M, YANG Y X, et al. Analysis on the guiding role of media in consumer’s food safety consumption[J]. Quality and Safety of Agro-Products, 2013(5): 69-73. (in Chinese)
[21]	马骥, 秦富. 消费者对安全农产品的认知能力及其影响因素: 基于北京市城镇消费者有机农产品消费行为的实证分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2009(5): 26-34.
	MA J, QIN F. Consumers’ cognitive ability of safe agricultural products and its influencing factors: an empirical analysis based on the consumption behavior of organic agricultural products of urban consumers in Beijing[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2009(5): 26-34. (in Chinese)
[22]	GRUNERT K G. Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand[J]. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2005, 32(3): 369-391.
[23]	BARON R M, KENNY D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173-1182.
[24]	JUDD C M, KENNY D A. Process analysis[J]. Evaluation Review, 1981, 5(5): 602-619.
[25]	温忠麟, 叶宝娟. 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(5): 731-745.
	WEN Z L, YE B J. Analyses of mediating effects: the development of methods and models[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(5): 731-745. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	王俊秀. 中国居民食品安全满意度调查[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2012(5): 66-71.
	WANG J X. Investigation on food safety satisfaction of China residents[J]. Jiangsu Social Sciences, 2012(5): 66-71. (in Chinese)
[27]	费威, 佟烁. 消费者视角下网售进口食品安全监管满意度影响因素分析[J]. 软科学, 2019, 33(7): 122-128.
	FEI W, TONG S. Study on influencing factors of imported food safety supervision satisfaction in online sales from the perspective of consumers[J]. Soft Science, 2019, 33(7): 122-128. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	孙明贵. 消费者的风险规避性及其对满意度的影响[J]. 商业经济与管理, 2015(10): 50-56.
	SUN M G. The influence consumers’ risk aversion with its satisfaction[J]. Journal of Business Economics, 2015(10): 50-56. (in Chinese)
[29]	柯福艳, 徐知渊, 占金荣. 农产品质量安全消费者满意评价影响因素分析: 来自浙江的调查[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(12): 2271-2281.
	KE F Y, XU Z Y, ZHAN J R. Influencing factors of consumer satisfaction evaluation on quality and safety of agricultural products: an illustration from Zhejiang Province[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2020, 32(12): 2271-2281. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	JAMES L R, BRETT J M. Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984, 69(2): 307-321.

指标 Index	选项 Option	样本量 Sample size	比例 Ratio/%	指标 Index	选项 Option	样本量 Sample size	比例 Ratio/%
性别Gender	男Male	1 228	40.13	受教育程度	高中及以下	1 780	58.17
	女Female	1 832	59.87	Educational level	High school and below
					本科及以上Bachelor or above	1 280	41.83
受访者年龄	≤40	1 114	36.41	家庭人均收入	<5万元<50 000 yuan	1 939	63.37
Age of	41~60	1 565	51.14	Household income	5~10万元50 000~100 000 yuan	663	21.67
respondents	≥61	381	12.45	per capita	>10万元>100 000 yuan	458	14.96

指标 Index	选项 Option	样本量 Sample size	比例 Ratio/%	指标 Index	选项 Option	样本量 Sample size	比例 Ratio/%
性别Gender	男Male	1 228	40.13	受教育程度	高中及以下	1 780	58.17
	女Female	1 832	59.87	Educational level	High school and below
					本科及以上Bachelor or above	1 280	41.83
受访者年龄	≤40	1 114	36.41	家庭人均收入	<5万元<50 000 yuan	1 939	63.37
Age of	41~60	1 565	51.14	Household income	5~10万元50 000~100 000 yuan	663	21.67
respondents	≥61	381	12.45	per capita	>10万元>100 000 yuan	458	14.96

变量 Variable	含义 Meaning	均值 Mean	标准差 SD
被解释变量Dependent variable
大米 Rice	1=很不满意;2=不满意;3=一般;4=比较满意;5=很满意 1=Very dissatisfied; 2=Dissatisfied; 3=Average; 4=Fairly satisfied; 5=Very satisfied	4.730	0.568
蔬菜 Vegetable	1=很不满意;2=不满意;3=一般;4=比较满意;5=很满意 1=Very dissatisfied; 2=Dissatisfied; 3=Average; 4=Fairly satisfied; 5=Very satisfied	4.729	0.560
水果 Fruit	1=很不满意;2=不满意;3=一般;4=比较满意;5=很满意 1=Very dissatisfied; 2=Dissatisfied; 3=Average; 4=Fairly satisfied; 5=Very satisfied	4.698	0.604
畜产品 Livestock products	1=很不满意;2=不满意;3=一般;4=比较满意;5=很满意 1=Very dissatisfied; 2=Dissatisfied; 3=Average; 4=Fairly satisfied; 5=Very satisfied	4.713	0.575
水产 Aquatic products	1=很不满意;2=不满意;3=一般;4=比较满意;5=很满意 1=Very dissatisfied; 2=Dissatisfied; 3=Average; 4=Fairly satisfied; 5=Very satisfied	4.680	0.612
林产品 Forest products	1=很不满意;2=不满意;3=一般;4=比较满意;5=很满意 1=Very dissatisfied; 2=Dissatisfied; 3=Average; 4=Fairly satisfied; 5=Very satisfied	4.708	0.590
核心解释变量Core independent variable
政府宣传 Government propaganda	您知道当地政府开展过农产品质量安全宣传或者培训吗(1=是;0=否) Do you know that the local government has carried out propaganda or training on agricultural product quality and safety (1=yes; 0=no)	0.893	0.309
中介变量Mediating variable
消费者认知 Consumer cognition	通过5个问题计算农产品质量安全认知得分 Calculate the quality and safety cognition score of agricultural products through five questions	3.300	0.995
替代变量Substitution variable
政府公告 Government announcement	您知道政府发布农产品质量安全监测公告了吗(1=是;0=否) Do you know that the government has issued an announcement on agricultural product quality and safety monitoring (1=yes; 0=no)	0.690	0.463
控制变量Control variable
年龄Age	被访者的年龄Age of respondents	46.196	12.708
性别Gender	被访者的性别(1=男;0=女)Gender of respondents(1=Male;0=Female)	0.401	0.490
受教育程度 Educational level	被访者的受教育程度(1=小学;2=初中;3=高中;4=大学;5=研究生) Educational level of respondents(1=Elementary school; 2=Junior high school; 3=High school; 4=University; 5=Graduate school)	2.937	1.136
健康状况 Health status	被访者健康状况(1=较差;2=一般;3=良好)Health status of respondents (1=poor;2=fair;3=good)	2.932	0.270
居住情况 Living situation	在当地居住的时间(1=1年以下;2=1-5年;3=5年以上) Time of living locally (1=Less than 1 year; 2=1-5 years; 3=More than 5 years)	2.901	0.352
家庭人均收入 Household income per capita	家庭人均收入(万元)的对数 Logarithm of household per capita income (10 000 yuan)	1.689	0.588

变量 Variable	含义 Meaning	均值 Mean	标准差 SD
被解释变量Dependent variable
大米 Rice	1=很不满意;2=不满意;3=一般;4=比较满意;5=很满意 1=Very dissatisfied; 2=Dissatisfied; 3=Average; 4=Fairly satisfied; 5=Very satisfied	4.730	0.568
蔬菜 Vegetable	1=很不满意;2=不满意;3=一般;4=比较满意;5=很满意 1=Very dissatisfied; 2=Dissatisfied; 3=Average; 4=Fairly satisfied; 5=Very satisfied	4.729	0.560
水果 Fruit	1=很不满意;2=不满意;3=一般;4=比较满意;5=很满意 1=Very dissatisfied; 2=Dissatisfied; 3=Average; 4=Fairly satisfied; 5=Very satisfied	4.698	0.604
畜产品 Livestock products	1=很不满意;2=不满意;3=一般;4=比较满意;5=很满意 1=Very dissatisfied; 2=Dissatisfied; 3=Average; 4=Fairly satisfied; 5=Very satisfied	4.713	0.575
水产 Aquatic products	1=很不满意;2=不满意;3=一般;4=比较满意;5=很满意 1=Very dissatisfied; 2=Dissatisfied; 3=Average; 4=Fairly satisfied; 5=Very satisfied	4.680	0.612
林产品 Forest products	1=很不满意;2=不满意;3=一般;4=比较满意;5=很满意 1=Very dissatisfied; 2=Dissatisfied; 3=Average; 4=Fairly satisfied; 5=Very satisfied	4.708	0.590
核心解释变量Core independent variable
政府宣传 Government propaganda	您知道当地政府开展过农产品质量安全宣传或者培训吗(1=是;0=否) Do you know that the local government has carried out propaganda or training on agricultural product quality and safety (1=yes; 0=no)	0.893	0.309
中介变量Mediating variable
消费者认知 Consumer cognition	通过5个问题计算农产品质量安全认知得分 Calculate the quality and safety cognition score of agricultural products through five questions	3.300	0.995
替代变量Substitution variable
政府公告 Government announcement	您知道政府发布农产品质量安全监测公告了吗(1=是;0=否) Do you know that the government has issued an announcement on agricultural product quality and safety monitoring (1=yes; 0=no)	0.690	0.463
控制变量Control variable
年龄Age	被访者的年龄Age of respondents	46.196	12.708
性别Gender	被访者的性别(1=男;0=女)Gender of respondents(1=Male;0=Female)	0.401	0.490
受教育程度 Educational level	被访者的受教育程度(1=小学;2=初中;3=高中;4=大学;5=研究生) Educational level of respondents(1=Elementary school; 2=Junior high school; 3=High school; 4=University; 5=Graduate school)	2.937	1.136
健康状况 Health status	被访者健康状况(1=较差;2=一般;3=良好)Health status of respondents (1=poor;2=fair;3=good)	2.932	0.270
居住情况 Living situation	在当地居住的时间(1=1年以下;2=1-5年;3=5年以上) Time of living locally (1=Less than 1 year; 2=1-5 years; 3=More than 5 years)	2.901	0.352
家庭人均收入 Household income per capita	家庭人均收入(万元)的对数 Logarithm of household per capita income (10 000 yuan)	1.689	0.588

变量 Variable	大米 Rice	蔬菜 Vegetable	水果 Fruit	畜产品 Livestock products	水产品 Aquatic products	林产品 Forest products
变量 Variable	方程(1-1) Equation (1-1)	方程(1-2) Equation (1-2)	方程(1-3) Equation (1-3)	方程(1-4) Equation (1-4)	方程(1-5) Equation (1-5)	方程(1-6) Equation (1-6)
政府宣传Government propaganda	0.943^***	0.916^***	0.922^***	0.988^***	0.975^***	0.941^***
	(0.071)	(0.073)	(0.072)	(0.072)	(0.071)	(0.072)
年龄Age	0.005^**	0.006^**	0.007^***	0.009^***	0.008^***	0.005^**
	(0.003)	(0.002)	(0.002)	(0.003)	(0.002)	(0.003)
性别Gender	0.100^*	0.111^**	0.053	0.085	0.090^*	0.105^*
	(0.056)	(0.055)	(0.054)	(0.055)	(0.053)	(0.055)
受教育程度Educational level	-0.041	-0.043	0.016	-0.009	-0.010	-0.009
	(0.032)	(0.031)	(0.031)	(0.030)	(0.029)	(0.031)
健康状况Health status	0.514^***	0.478^***	0.485^***	0.524^***	0.527^***	0.510^***
	(0.088)	(0.087)	(0.089)	(0.090)	(0.084)	(0.085)
居住情况Living situation	0.190^***	0.112	0.106	0.055	0.148^**	0.155^**
	(0.066)	(0.068)	(0.068)	(0.068)	(0.063)	(0.063)
家庭人均收入	0.105^**	0.148^***	0.110^**	0.107^**	0.113^**	0.127^**
Household income per capita	(0.052)	(0.052)	(0.051)	(0.051)	(0.049)	(0.051)
地区虚拟变量Region dummy variable	已控制Yes	已控制Yes	已控制Yes	已控制Yes	已控制Yes	已控制Yes
虚拟R² Pseudo R²	0.10	0.09	0.09	0.09	0.09	0.10
Wald检验值Wald test	370.87	358.14	376.12	382.50	416.90	379.89
极大似然值MLE	-1 797.74	-1 811.51	-1 944.43	-1 866.34	-2 009.32	-1 893.37

Government propaganda, consumer awareness and satisfaction with quality and safety of agricultural products: based on survey data from 18 districts and counties in Zhejiang Province, China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 30

Related Articles 4

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

变量 Variable	大米 Rice		蔬菜 Vegetable		水果 Fruit		畜产品 Livestock products		水产品 Aquatic products		林产品 Forest products
变量 Variable	替换自变量 Replace independent variable	替换因变量 Replace dependent variable	替换自变量 Replace independent variable	替换因变量 Replace dependent variable	替换自变量 Replace independent variable	替换因变量 Replace dependent variable	替换自变量 Replace independent variable	替换因变量 Replace dependent variable	替换自变量 Replace independent variable	替换因变量 Replace dependent variable	替换自变量 Replace independent variable	替换因变量 Replace dependent variable
政府公告	0.681^***		0.684^***		0.690^***		0.671^***		0.667^***		0.680^***
Government	(0.055)		(0.054)		(0.054)		(0.054)		(0.053)		(0.054)
announcement
政府宣传		1.598^***		2.051^***		1.781^***		1.740^***		1.655^***		1.489 5^***
Government		(0.253)		(0.288)		(0.232)		(0.245)		(0.224)		0.224
propaganda
控制变量 Control	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes
variables
地区虚拟变量 Region dummy variable	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes
虚拟R²	0.10	0.13	0.09	0.15	0.09	0.13	0.09	0.12	0.09	0.15	0.09	0.15
Pseudo R²
模型Model	Oprobit	Logit	Oprobit	Logit	Oprobit	Logit	Oprobit	Logit	Oprobit	Logit	Oprobit	Logit

变量 Variable	消费者认知 Consumer cognition	大米 Rice	蔬菜 Vegetable	水果 Fruit	畜产品 Livestock products	水产品 Aquatic products	林产品 Forest products
变量 Variable	方程(2-1) Equation (2-1)	方程(2-2) Equation (2-2)	方程(2-3) Equation (2-3)	方程(2-4) Equation (2-4)	方程(2-5) Equation (2-5)	方程(2-6) Equation (2-6)	方程(2-7) Equation (2-7)
政府宣传	0.462^***	0.909^***	0.876^***	0.878^***	0.947^***	0.933^***	0.896^***
Government	(0.072)	(0.072)	(0.074)	(0.072)	(0.073)	(0.071)	(0.073)
propaganda
消费者认知	—	0.090^***	0.105^***	0.115^***	0.107^***	0.101^***	0.113^***
Consumer cognition		(0.026)	(0.027)	(0.026)	(0.026)	(0.025)	(0.026)
控制变量	已控制Yes	已控制Yes	已控制Yes	已控制Yes	已控制Yes	已控制Yes	已控制Yes
Control variable
地区虚拟变量	已控制Yes	已控制Yes	已控制Yes	已控制Yes	已控制Yes	已控制Yes	已控制Yes
Region dummy variable
R²/虚拟R²	0.10	0.10	0.10	0.09	0.10	0.10	0.10
R²/Pseudo R²
模型Model	OLS	Oprobit	Oprobit	Oprobit	Oprobit	Oprobit	Oprobit

变量 Variable	大米 Rice		蔬菜 Vegetable		水果 Fruit		畜产品 Livestock products		水产品 Aquatic products		林产品 Forest products
政府宣传	1.064^***	0.424^**	1.018^***	0.463^**	1.049^***	0.321^*	1.099^***	0.589^***	1.095^***	0.440^**	1.119^***	0.212
Government propaganda	(0.079)	(0.191)	(0.079)	(0.188)	(0.078)	(0.183)	(0.079)	(0.185)	(0.078)	(0.181)	(0.080)	(0.181)
年龄(组别) Age (group)	年轻组 Young group	年长组 Older group	年轻组 Young group	年长组 Older group	年轻组 Young group	年长组 Older group	年轻组 Young group	年长组 Older group	年轻组 Young group	年长组 Older group	年轻组 Young group	年长组 Older group
控制变量 Control variable	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes
地区虚拟变量 Region dummy variable	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes
样本量Sample size	2 591	469	2 591	469	2 591	469	2 591	469	2 591	469	2 591	469
虚拟R²	0.11	0.17	0.10	0.16	0.09	0.15	0.10	0.15	0.11	0.16	0.11	0.11
Pseudo R²
模型Model	Oprobit	Oprobit	Oprobit	Oprobit	Oprobit	Oprobit	Oprobit	Oprobit	Oprobit	Oprobit	Oprobit	Oprobit

变量 Variable	大米 Rice		蔬菜 Vegetable		水果 Fruit		畜产品 Livestock products		水产品 Aquatic products		林产品 Forest products
政府宣传	0.825^***	1.225^***	0.780^***	1.309^***	0.810^***	1.228^***	0.862^***	1.301^***	0.853^***	1.321^***	0.819^***	1.227^***
Government propaganda	(0.084)	(0.145)	(0.084)	(0.147)	(0.083)	(0.143)	(0.084)	(0.144)	(0.083)	(0.143)	(0.083)	(0.146)
受教育程度(组别) Educational level(group)	低教育程度组 Low education level group	高教育程度组 High education level group	低教育程度组 Low education level group	高教育程度组 High education level group	低教育程度组 Low education level group	高教育程度组 High education level group	低教育程度组 Low education level group	高教育程度组 High education level group	低教育程度组 Low education level group	高教育程度组 High education level group	低教育程度组 Low education level group	高教育程度组 High education level group
控制变量 Control variable	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes
地区虚拟变量 Region dummy variable	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes	已控制 Yes
样本量Sample size	1 780	1 280	1 780	1 280	1 780	1 280	1 780	1 280	1 780	1 280	1 780	1 280
虚拟R²	0.11	0.13	0.09	0.13	0.09	0.12	0.09	0.13	0.10	0.12	0.10	0.12
Pseudo R²
模型Model	Oprobit	Oprobit	Oprobit	Oprobit	Oprobit	Oprobit	Oprobit	Oprobit	Oprobit	Oprobit	Oprobit	Oprobit

[1]	WU Zhong’an, XU Yulu, CHEN Fan. Study on influencing factors of farmers’ satisfaction with new rural cooperative medical system from perspective of rural revitalization: microscopic data from 2 152 farmers across China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(2): 477-488.
[2]	YAO Xingyuan, WANG Weifang. Consumer participation and satisfaction with digital green inclusive financial products [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(8): 1542-1551.
[3]	KE Fuyan, XU Zhiyuan, ZHAN Jinrong. Influencing factors of consumer satisfaction evaluation on quality and safety of agricultural products: an illustration from Zhejiang Province [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2020, 32(12): 2271-2281.
[4]	SU Fei;PANG Ling\\|feng*;MA Li\\|sha. The impact of livelihood capital on the life satisfaction of urban migrant workers in Hangzhou [J]. , 2014, 26(1): 0-246.