果实品质综合评价体系的建立及其在黄果柑果实上的应用

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2017.12.12

浙江农业学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (12): 2038-2050.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2017.12.12

果实品质综合评价体系的建立及其在黄果柑果实上的应用

叶霜¹, 熊博¹, 邱霞¹, 孙国超², 黄胜佳¹, 付佳玲¹, 汪志辉^{1, 2, *}

1.四川农业大学园艺学院,四川成都 611130;
2.四川农业大学果蔬研究所,四川成都 611130

收稿日期:2017-04-28 出版日期:2017-12-20 发布日期:2018-01-08
通讯作者: 汪志辉,E-mail:wangzhihui318@126.com
作者简介:叶霜(1992—),女,重庆人,硕士研究生,研究方向为柑橘栽培生理与技术。E-mail:ysys678123@163.com
基金资助:
四川省科技支撑计划项目(211NZ0034); 四川省科技厅基金项目(10ZC1454); 四川农业大学研究生社会实践与科技服务团项目(ACT201304)

Establishment of comprehensive evaluation system of fruit quality and its application on Huangguogan fruit

YE Shuang¹, XIONG Bo¹, QIU Xia¹, SUN Guochao², HUANG Shengjia¹, FU Jialing¹, WANG Zhihui^{1, 2, *}

1. College of Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China;
2. Institute of Pomology & Olericulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China

Received:2017-04-28 Online:2017-12-20 Published:2018-01-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为使果实品质综合评价体系中各指标权重值更加科学,综合评价结果更加客观、合理,该研究利用层次分析法确定各评价指标权重,建立一个果实品质指标水平库,并基于此计算综合得分,从而构建果实品质综合评价体系。在此过程中,对层次分析法标度进行筛选,最后,将此评价体系应用于黄果柑优良单株筛选。结果显示,0.618标度法能平滑各个评价指标,且当评价指标达5个时,0.618标度法的一致性优于1-9标度法。通过查阅文献和试验测定建立了黄果柑果实品质指标水平库,利用此果实品质评价体系评价了162株黄果柑单株,筛选出了36株果实品质优良的黄果柑单株。在果实品质评价体系中,使用0.618标度法构建判断矩阵所得权重值更准确。

关键词: 果实品质, 综合评价, 层次分析法, 指标水平库, 黄果柑

Abstract: In order to make the index weight value in the comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality more scientific, and improve the objectivity and reasonability of the comprehensive evaluation results, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to determine the weight of each evaluation index, and a fruit quality index level library was set up, based on this calculation of each index score, and combined with the weight to calculate the comprehensive score. Finally, a comprehensive evaluation system of fruit quality was established. In this process, two scales of analytic hierarchy process (1-9 scale method and 0.618 scale method) were screened, and this evaluation system was applied to the selection of Huangguogan superior individual. The results showed that the 0.618 scale method could smooth each evaluation index, and when the evaluation index reached 5, the consistency of the judgment matrix constructed by the 0.618 scale method was significantly better than that of 1-9 scale method. Combined with the test datum, this experiment established Huangguogan fruit quality index level library. The fruit quality evaluation system was used to evaluate 162 Huangguogan plants, and 36 Huangguogan plants with excellent fruit quality were screened out. In the fruit quality evaluation system, it was more reasonable and accurate to use the 0.618 scale method to construct the judgment matrix.

Key words: fruit quality, comprehensive evaluation, analytic hierarchy process, index level library, Huangguogan

中图分类号:

S666.1

叶霜, 熊博, 邱霞, 孙国超, 黄胜佳, 付佳玲, 汪志辉. 果实品质综合评价体系的建立及其在黄果柑果实上的应用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(12): 2038-2050.

YE Shuang, XIONG Bo, QIU Xia, SUN Guochao, HUANG Shengjia, FU Jialing, WANG Zhihui. Establishment of comprehensive evaluation system of fruit quality and its application on Huangguogan fruit[J]. , 2017, 29(12): 2038-2050.

参考文献

[1] 朱麟, 凌建刚, 尚海涛, 等. 因子分析法综合评价冰温结合1-MCP处理对‘玉露’水蜜桃贮藏品质的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2016, 33(9): 1164-1172.
ZHU L, LING J G, SHANG H T, et al. Factor analysis of the effects of controlled freezing-point storage in combination with 1-MCP treatment on quality of ‘Yulu' juicy peaches during cold storage[J]. Journal of Fruit Science , 2016, 33(9): 1164-1172. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] 倪志华, 郭娟华, 辜青青, 等. 南丰蜜橘品质评价指标的聚类分析[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2011, 33(4): 670-673.
NI Z H, GUO J H, GU Q Q, et al. Cluster analysis of fruit quality evaluation indices of Nanfeng Tangerine[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis , 2011, 33(4): 670-673. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] 郑丽静, 聂继云, 李明强, 等. 苹果风味评价指标的筛选研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(14): 2796-2805.
ZHENG L J, NIE J Y, LI M Q, et al. Study on screening of taste evaluation indexes for apple[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica , 2015, 48(14): 2796-2805. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4] 王大江, 王昆, 高源, 等. 不同矮化中间砧对‘蜜脆’苹果植株生长及果实功能性成分含量影响的综合评价[J]. 果树学报, 2016, 33(6): 686-693.
WANG D J, WANG K, GAO Y, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of the relationship between dwarfing interstocks and growth power and functional ingredients in the ‘Honeycrisp' apple[J]. Journal of Fruit Science , 2016, 33(6): 686-693. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] 胡中海, 孙谦, 马亚琴, 等. 冷冻对温州蜜柑橘瓣品质影响的灰色关联度分析评价[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2015, 37(8): 198-202.
HU Z H, SUN Q, MA Y Q, et al. Evaluation the effect of freezing on quality of Satsuma Mandarin ( Citrusunshiu unshiu ) segment by grey correlative degree analysis[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries , 2015, 37(8): 198-202. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] AYDI A, ABICHOU T, NASR I H, et al. Assessment of land suitability for olive mill wastewater disposal site selection by integrating fuzzy logic, AHP, and WLC in a GIS[J]. Environmental Monitoring & Assessment , 2015, 187(12): 59.
[7] 陈海涛. 太湖流域近20年水环境承载力动态评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(12): 2186-2192.
CHENG H T. Dynamic assessment on water environmental carrying capacity in Taihu Lake Watershed in past 20 years[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis , 2015, 27(12): 2186-2192. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] CANCELA J, FICO G, WALDMEYER M T A. Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to understand the most important factors to design and evaluate a telehealth system for Parkinson's disease[J]. BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making , 2015, 15(S3): S7.
[9] PENG J, LIU Z, LIU Y, et al. Multifunctionality assessment of urban agriculture in Beijing City, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment , 2015, 537: 343.
[10] 张翠英, 游兆彤, 汪国平. 农产品供应链合作伙伴选择标准研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(6): 1043-1049.
ZHANG C Y, YOU Z T, WANG G P. Research on selection criteria of agri-products supply chain partner[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis , 2017, 29(6):1043-1049. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] 焦艺, 刘璇, 毕金峰, 等. 基于灰色关联度和层次分析法的油桃果汁品质评价[J]. 中国食品学报, 2014, 14(12): 154-163.
JIAO Y, LIU X, BI J F, et al. Quality evaluation of nectarine juice based on grey interconnect degree analysis and analytic hierarchy process[J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology , 2014, 14(12): 154-163. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] 杜清洁, 李建明, 潘铜华, 等. 滴灌条件下水肥耦合对番茄产量及综合品质的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2015, 33(5): 10-17.
DU Q J, LI J M, PAN T H, et al. The compound effects of water and fertilizer on yield and quality of tomato under drip irrigation[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas , 2015, 33(5): 10-17. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] 刘璇, 王沛, 毕金峰, 等. 基于层次分析法的晚熟品种苹果脆片品质评价[J]. 食品与机械, 2012, 28(5): 46-50.
LIU X, WANG P, BI J F, et al. Quality evaluation of late maturity apple chips based on analytic hierarchy process[J]. Food & Machinery , 2012, 28(5): 46-50. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] 刘遵春, 包东娥, 廖明安. 层次分析法在金花梨果实品质评价上的应用[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 34(8): 125-128.
LIU Z C, BAO D E, LIAO M A. Application of analytic hierarchy process in evaluating Jinhua pear quality[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University ( Natural Science Edition ), 2006, 34(8): 125-128. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] 闫敏慧, 姚秀萍, 王蕾, 等. 用层次分析法确定气象服务评价指标权重[J]. 应用气象学报, 2014, 25(4): 470-475.
YAN M H, YAO X P, WANG L, et al. Determining weight coefficients of meteorological service evaluation criteria with AHP[J]. Jouranl of Applied Meteorological Science , 2014, 25(4): 470-475. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] 邓雪, 李家铭, 曾浩健, 等. 层次分析法权重计算方法分析及其应用研究[J].数学的实践与认识, 2012, 42(7): 93-100.
DENG X, LI J M, ZENG H J, et al. Research on computation methods of AHP weight vector and its applications[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory , 2012, 42(7): 93-100. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17] 罗绍伟. 基于熵权和层次分析法的学科馆员服务质量模糊综合评价[J]. 现代情报, 2009, 29(8): 43-47.
LUO S W. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of the subject librarian service quality based on the entropy weight and analytical hierarchy process[J]. Journal of Modern Information , 2009, 29(8): 43-47. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18] 孙红才, 田平, 王莲芬. 网络层次分析法与决策科学[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2011.
[19] 范芳娟. 水蜜桃果实品质综合评价体系及数据库的建立与应用[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2014.
FAN F J. Establishment and application of melting peach fruit quality comprehensive evaluation system and database[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2014. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20] 张治安, 张美善, 蔚荣海. 植物生化实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2004.
[21] 李湘钰. 光照条件对骏枣叶片发育和果实品质及糖代谢相关酶变化的影响[D]. 阿拉尔: 塔里木大学, 2014.
LI X Y. Effect of light intensity on leaf development and fruit quality and metabolism of sugar related enzymes of Zizyphus jujuba Mill.cv. Junzao[D]. Alaer: Tarim University, 2014. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22] 王大华, 李天眷, 潘承泉, 等. 汉源晚熟黄果柑的生物学性状[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 1989, 7(3): 137-141.
WANG D H, LI T J, PAN C Q, et al. The biological character of Hanyuan late rirening Huangguogan[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultura University , 1989, 7(3): 137-141. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] 冯秋平. 黄果柑不同株系比较与提高果实品质研究[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2010: 14-31.
FENG Q P. Studies on the strains comparing and improving fruit quality technologies of Citrus Cultivar cv. Huangguogan[D]. Ya'an: Sichuan Agricultura University, 2010: 14-31.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] 熊博, 汪志辉, 石冬冬, 等. 黄果柑果实粒化与细胞壁物质及多胺的关系[J]. 华北农学报, 2014, 29(b12): 239-242.
XIONG B, WANG Z H, SHI D D, et al. Relationship between granulation and materials of cell wall polyamine in Huangguogan fruit[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-sinica , 2014, 29(b12): 239-242. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25] 秦文, 王大华, 徐玉华, 等. 黄果柑优系鲜果常温贮藏初探[J]. 亚热带植物通讯, 1993, 22(1): 55-57.
QIN W, WANG D H, XU Y H, et al. Huangguogan optimal of fresh fruit at room temperature storage[J]. Subtrop. Plant Res. Commun , 1993, 22(1): 55-57. (in Chinese)
[26] 蒲雪荔. 石棉黄果柑增糖降酸效应研究[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2013 :23-30.
PU X L. Studies on increasing the sugar content and reducing the organic acid content of Huangguogan fruit in Shimian[D]. Ya'an: Sichuan Agricultura University, 2013: 23-30. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27] 蒋黎黎. 石棉黄果柑壮果钾肥的最佳施用量研究[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2012: 21-34.
JIANG L L. Study on optimal fertilizer of strong citrus fruit potash for Shimian Huangguogan[D]. Ya'an: Sichuan Agricultura University, 2012: 21-34. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28] 王茂丽. 香椿优良单株的初步筛选及其综合评价[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2006.
WANG M L. Preliminary screening and comprehensive evaluation of superior plants of Toona sinensis [D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2006. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29] 陈贤, 吴兴恩, 杨德, 等. 主成分权重法在番茄果实商品性综合评价上的应用探讨[J]. 吉林农业科学, 2008,33(4): 49-52.
CHEN X, WU X E, YANG D, et al. Discussion on comprehensive evaluation of commercial traits of tomato fruits using the method of weighting of principal component[J]. Journal of Jilin Agricultural Sciences , 2008, 33(4): 49-52. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30] 任广跃, 刘亚男, 乔小全,等. 基于变异系数权重法对怀山药干燥全粉品质的评价[J]. 食品科学, 2017, 38(1): 53-59.
REN G Y, LIU Y N, QIAO X Q, et al. Quality evaluation of the preparation of Chinese Yam drying Powder based on the weight of variation coefficient[J]. Food Science , 2017, 38(1): 53-59. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31] 王轩, 毕金峰, 刘璇, 等. 不同产地红富士苹果品质的灰色关联度分析[J]. 食品科学, 2013, 34(23): 88-91.
WANG X, BI J F, LIU X, et al. Application of grey correlation analysis for evaluating the overall quality of Fuji apples from different growing areas[J]. Food Science , 2013, 34(23): 88-91. (in Chinese with English abstract)

果实品质综合评价体系的建立及其在黄果柑果实上的应用

Establishment of comprehensive evaluation system of fruit quality and its application on Huangguogan fruit

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张发明, 丁峰, 王坪. 中国粮食主产区农业高质量发展水平评价与时空演变[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(1): 150-160.
[2]	牛素贞, 安红卫, 宋勤飞, 陈正武. 贵州野生茶树立地土壤养分状况分析及综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(6): 1039-1048.
[3]	邓倩, 王羊, 邓群仙, 辛亚宁, 李雷, 龙星雨, 祝进, 张慧芬, 夏惠, 梁东. 蜀脆枣果实发育规律及品质积累特性分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(4): 644-652.
[4]	马小华, 俞浙萍, 郑锡良, 胡晓金, 张淑文, 戚行江, 马靖艳. 靖州杨梅引种试验与表型聚类分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(11): 1987-1993.
[5]	张淑文, 梁森苗, 朱婷婷, 任海英, 郑锡良, 戚行江. 不同杨梅品种的耐低温能力比较[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(10): 1772-1779.
[6]	汪炳良, 海睿, 金炳胜, 江建红, 施星仁, 林玉泉, 叶红霞. 嫁接方法对甜瓜嫁接工效及嫁接苗生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(10): 1809-1815.
[7]	陈心源, 殷益明, 朱利鑫, 陶宁颖, 满坤, 贾惠娟. 光质对火龙果糖分积累及其代谢酶活性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(7): 1079-1085.
[8]	陈越, 张敦宇, 丁明亮, 王玲仙, 肖素勤, 柯学, 程在全. 多个省份水稻资源的表型多样性与优异资源的筛选[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(11): 1779-1789.
[9]	毛小报, 傅琳琳, 毛晓红, 阿迪拉·艾海提. 浙江省农业可持续发展水平评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(11): 1926-1934.
[10]	肖金平, 常路伟, 张慧琴, 谢鸣, 古咸彬, 熊彩珍, 吴大军. 避雨设施栽培对中晚熟水蜜桃果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(10): 1632-1638.
[11]	马逍原, 舒也, 史琰, 包志毅. 雨水花园植物选择及配置——以上海共康雨水花园为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(9): 1526-1533.
[12]	代琳, 徐媛媛, 熊博, 黄胜佳, 孙国超, 汪志辉. 黄果柑果实抗坏血酸、谷胱甘肽和有机酸积累特性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(8): 1341-1348.
[13]	薛莞莞, 龚荣高, 丁建林, 李克强, 邹金, 李如龙, 彭宏贵. 赤霉素喷施对红灯甜樱桃果实品质及解剖结构的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(6): 978-984.
[14]	李秋利, 高登涛, 魏志峰, 王志强, 刘军伟, 杨文佳. 不同浓度茉莉酸甲酯对春蜜桃果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(6): 985-991.
[15]	张青. 贮藏温度对越心和章姬草莓果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(4): 600-606.