免耕留茬耕作对中小型土壤动物群落的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2018.05.21

浙江农业学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 825-831.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2018.05.21

免耕留茬耕作对中小型土壤动物群落的影响

马南, 钱瑞雪, 杨慧敏, 陈智文, 蒋云峰^*

吉林师范大学旅游与地理科学学院,吉林四平 136000

收稿日期:2017-07-06 出版日期:2018-05-20 发布日期:2018-05-23
通讯作者: 蒋云峰,E-mail: jiangyf427@126.com
作者简介:马南(1992—),女,黑龙江齐齐哈尔人,硕士研究生,研究方向为土壤动物生态学。E-mail: mnjlsd@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(41401283); 吉林省重点科技成果转化项目(20140307034NY); 吉林省科技厅发展计划(20160520080JH); 吉林省教育厅“十三五”科学技术研究项目(吉教科合字〔2016〕第224号)

Effects of no tillage and stubble mulch on soil meso-microfauna communities

MA Nan, QIAN Ruixue, YANG Huimin, CHEN Zhiwen, JIANG Yunfeng^*

College of Tourism and Geography Sciences, Jilin Normal University, Siping 136000, China

Received:2017-07-06 Online:2018-05-20 Published:2018-05-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨免耕、留高茬耕作方式对中小型土壤动物群落的组成、结构和季节变化的影响,于2015年4月、7月和10月,在中国科学院吉林省梨树县保护性耕作试验基地,对免耕、留茬和常规处理样地进行中小型土壤动物群落调查。结果显示,本次调查共获得中小型土壤动物18 309只,隶属于2门6纲16目,优势类群为甲螨、革螨、球角跳科和等节跳科。免耕处理样地中小型土壤动物个体密度高于其他处理样地,类群丰富度和多样性指数则以留茬处理最高。各处理样地个体密度最高值均出现在10月。主要土壤动物类群对不同耕作方式及季节变化的响应存在差异。相对于常规耕作,免耕和留茬耕作增加了土壤动物类群和个体数量。

关键词: 耕作方式, 土壤生态, 保护性耕作

Abstract: In order to evaluate the effects of no-tillage and stubble mulch on the soil meso-microfauna assemblages, the abundance, community composition and seasonal variation of soil meso-microfauna were investigated in the Conservation Tillage Research and Development Station of Chinese Academy of Sciences in Lishu County, Jilin Province in April, July and October, 2015. A total of 18 309 soil meso-microfauna were obtained, which belonged to 2 phyla, 6 classes, 16 orders. Among them, the dominant group is Oribatida, Mesostigmata, Hypogastruridae and Isotomidae. The individual density of soil meso-microfauna in no-tillage plots was higher than that in other treatments, while the highest taxon richness and diversity index was appeared in the stubble mulch plot. The highest individual density was recorded in October for all treatment plots. Major soil animal groups differed in response to tillage methods and seasonal variations. Compared with conventional tillage, no-tillage and stubble mulch could increase the individual density of major soil animal groups.

Key words: culti vation, soil ecology, conservation tillage

中图分类号:

S154.5

马南, 钱瑞雪, 杨慧敏, 陈智文, 蒋云峰. 免耕留茬耕作对中小型土壤动物群落的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(5): 825-831.

MA Nan, QIAN Ruixue, YANG Huimin, CHEN Zhiwen, JIANG Yunfeng. Effects of no tillage and stubble mulch on soil meso-microfauna communities[J]. , 2018, 30(5): 825-831.

参考文献

[1] 张海林, 高旺盛, 陈阜, 等. 保护性耕作研究现状、发展趋势及对策[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2005, 10(1): 16-20.
ZHANG H L, GAO W S, CHEN F, et al.Prospects and present situation of conservation tillage[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2005, 10(1): 16-20. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] 薛建福, 赵鑫, DIKGWATLHE S B, 等. 保护性耕作对农田碳、氮效应的影响研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(19): 6006-6013.
XUE J F, ZHAO X, DIKGWATLHE S B, et al.Advances in effects of conservation tillage on soil organic carbon and nitrogen[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(19):6006-6013. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] 陈强, KRAVCHENKO Y S, 陈渊, 等. 少免耕土壤结构与导水能力的季节变化及其水保效果[J]. 土壤学报, 2014, 51(1): 11-21.
CHEN Q, KRAVCHENKO Y S, CHEN Y, et al.Seasona variations of soil structures and hydraulic conductivities and their effects on soil and water conservation under no-tillage and reduced tillage[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2014, 51(1): 11-21. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4] YIN X Q, SONG B, DONG W H, et al.A review on the eco-geography of soil fauna in China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2010, 20(3): 333-346.
[5] 尹文英. 中国亚热带土壤动物[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1992.
[6] LAVELLE, P, DECAËNS, T, AUBERT, M, et al. Soil invertebrates and ecosystem services[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2006, 42(11):S3-S15.
[7] 朱强根, 朱安宁, 张佳宝, 等. 华北潮土区不同耕作方式下土壤动物丰富度与多样性[J]. 土壤, 2010, 42(2): 236-242.
ZHU Q G, ZHU A N, ZHANG J B, et al.Abundance and diversity of soil fauna under different tillage systems in fluvor aquic soil in north China[J]. Soils, 2010, 42(2): 236-242. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] 高明, 周保同, 魏朝富, 等. 不同耕作方式对稻田土壤动物、微生物及酶活性的影响研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(7): 1177-1181.
GAO M, ZHOU B T, WEI C F, et al.Effect of tillage system on soil animal, microorganismand enzyme activity in paddy field[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004, 15(7): 1177-1181. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] 尹文英. 中国土壤动物检索图鉴[M]. 北京:科学出版, 1998.
[10] 南开大学, 中山大学, 北京大学, 等. 昆虫学:上[M]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 1980.
[11] WARDLE D A.Impacts of disturbance on detritus food webs in agroeco systems of contracting tillage and weed management practices[J]. Advances in Ecological Research, 1995, 26(5): 105-185.
[12] BENGTSSON J.Disturbance and resilience in soil animal communities[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2002, 38(2): 119-125.
[13] COLE L, BUCK LAND S M, BARDGETT R D. Influence of disturbance and nitrogen addition on plant and soil animal diversity in grassland[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2008, 40(2): 505-514.
[14] 陈浩, 李洪文, 高焕文, 等. 多年固定道保护性耕作对土壤结构的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(11): 122-125.
CHEN H, LI H W, GAO H W, et al.Effect of long-term controlled traffic conservation tillage on soil structure[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2008,24(11):122-125. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] 杜建涛, 何文清, NANGIA V, 等. 北方旱区保护性耕作对农田土壤水分的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(11): 25-29.
DU J T, HE W Q, NANGIA V, et al.Effects of conservation tillage on soil water content in northern arid regions of China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2008,24(11):25-29. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] SIX J, FELLER C, DENEF K, et al.Soil organic matter, biota and aggregation in temperate and tropical soils: effects of no-tillage[J]. Agronomie, 2002, 22(7): 755-775.
[17] ERROUISSI F, MOUSSA-MACHRAOUI S B, BEN-HAMMOUDA M, et al. Soil invertebrates in durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) cropping system under Mediterranean semi arid conditions: a comparison between conventional and no-tillage management[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2011, 112(2): 122-132.
[18] 张文颖, 张恩和, 景锐, 等. 河西绿洲灌区春小麦留茬免耕的防风蚀效应研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2009, 17(2): 244-249.
ZHANG W Y, ZHANG E H, JING R, et al.Effect of non-tillage with straw mulch on wind erosion in irrigated oases of Hexi corridor[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture , 2009, 17(2): 244-249. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] 方日尧, 同延安, 赵二龙, 等. 渭北旱原不同保护性耕作方式水肥增产效应研究[J]. 干旱区农业研究, 2003, 21(1): 54-57.
FANG R Y, TONG Y A, ZHAO E L, et al.Effect of conservation tillages on moisture,fertility and yield in Weibei Highland[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2003, 21(1): 54-57. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20] COULSON S J, HODKINSON I D, WOOLEY C, et al.Effects of experimental temperature elevation on high-arctic soil microarthropod populations[J]. Polar Biology, 1996, 16(2): 147-153.
[21] HODKINSON I D, HEALEY V, COULSON S.Moisture relationships of the high arctic collembolan Onychiurus arcticus[J]. Physiological Entomology, 1994, 19: 109-114.
[22] CHOI W I, MOORHEAD D L, NEHER D A, et al.A modeling study of soil temperature and moisture effects on population dynamics of Paronychiurus kimi(Collembola: Onychiuridae)[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2006, 43(1): 69-75.
[23] 朱纪元, 李景科, 程赛赛, 等. 小兴安岭阔叶红松林局地尺度地表鞘翅目成虫群落结构[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2016, 44(12): 57-63.
ZHU J Y, LI J K, CHENG S S, et al.Community structure of adult coleoptera on local scale in a mixed broad leaved korean pine forest in the Xiaoxing'an Mountains[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2016, 44(12): 57-63. (in Chinese with English abstract)

免耕留茬耕作对中小型土壤动物群落的影响

Effects of no tillage and stubble mulch on soil meso-microfauna communities

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘根红, 薛银鑫, 张倩, 周佳瑞, 买小凤. 滴灌条件下不同耕深及秸秆还田量对玉米生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(1): 8-17.
[2]	张统帅, 闫丽娟, 李广, 陈国鹏, 罗永忠. 免耕和秸秆覆盖对旱作区土壤氮素、水分和春小麦产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(8): 1329-1341.
[3]	吴兴慧, 张余, 李振宙, 周良, 黄小燕, 陈庆富, 黄凯丰. 不同耕作方式对苦荞衰老和籽粒灌浆特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(12): 1963-1970.
[4]	吴才武，夏建新*. 保护性耕作的水土保持机理及其在东北黑土区的推广建议[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(2): 254-.