基于主成分分析及隶属函数法的巨菌草幼苗耐盐碱性评价

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2019.09.18

浙江农业学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (9): 1531-1540.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2019.09.18

基于主成分分析及隶属函数法的巨菌草幼苗耐盐碱性评价

闫晶秋子¹, 李钢铁^1,*, 刘玉军², 麻云霞¹, 杨颖¹

1.内蒙古农业大学沙漠治理学院,内蒙古呼和浩特 010018;
2.通辽市奈曼旗林业局兴隆沼林场,内蒙古通辽 028300

收稿日期:2019-04-01 出版日期:2019-09-25 发布日期:2019-10-11
通讯作者: *李钢铁,E-mail: 13848817183@163.com
作者简介:闫晶秋子(1994—),女,甘肃金塔人,硕士研究生,研究方向为沙区植物资源保护与利用。E-mail:450604975@qq.com
基金资助:
内蒙古自治区科技成果转化项目(CGZH2018137)

Evaluation of salt and alkali resistance of Pennisetum giganteum Z. X. Lin seedlings based on principal component analysis and membership function method

YAN Jingqiuzi¹, LI Gangtie^1,*, LIU Yujun², MA Yunxia¹, YANG Ying¹

1. College of Desert Control Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China;
2. Xinglongzhao Forest Farm, Naimanqi Forestry Bureau of Tongliao City, Tongliao 028300, China

Received:2019-04-01 Online:2019-09-25 Published:2019-10-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 模拟不同浓度的混合盐碱胁迫环境,测定巨菌草幼苗的株高生长量(H)、含水量(MC)、相对含水量(RWC)、水分饱和亏(WSD)、丙二醛含量(MDA)、过氧化氢酶活性(CAT)、超氧化物歧化酶活性(SOD)、可溶性糖含量(SS)、游离脯氨酸含量(Pro)、可溶性蛋白含量(SP)、叶绿素含量(Chl)(含叶绿素a含量Chla、叶绿素b含量Chlb)的变化,对其抗盐碱性进行综合评价。结果表明:随盐碱浓度升高,不同混合盐碱胁迫下巨菌草幼苗的H、RWC不同程度地下降,CAT、SOD活性,以及SS、SP、Pro含量变化不一。当组配的溶液中NaCl、Na₂SO₄、NaHCO₃浓度比为1:2:1、总盐碱浓度为30 mmol·L^-1时,供试巨菌草的隶属函数综合得分最高,为0.893,说明巨菌草在该环境下耐受性较好。

关键词: 巨菌草, 幼苗耐盐性, 主成分分析, 隶属函数

Abstract: The plant height increase (H), water content (MC), relative water content (RWC), water saturation deficit (WSD), malondialdehyde content (MDA), catalase activity (CAT), superoxide dismutase activity (SOD), soluble sugar content (SS), free proline content (Pro), soluble protein content (SP), chlorophyll content (Chl) (including chlorophyll a content Chla, and chlorophyll b content Chlb) of Pennisetum giganteum Z. X. Lin seedlings were determined under simulated saline-alkali stress, and comprehensive evaluation of saline-alkali resistance was also carried out. It was shown that with the increase of saline-alkali concentration, H, RWC decreased, while the activities of CAT, SOD, and contents of SS, SP, Pro varied differently. When the concentration of test solution was 30 mmol·L^-1, and the ratio of NaCl, Na₂SO₄, NaHCO₃ concentration was 1:2:1, the comprehensive score of membership function was the highest (0.893), indicating good tolerance of Pennisetum giganteum Z. X. Lin under this simulated environment.

Key words: Pennisetum giganteum Z. X. Lin, salt tolerance of seedlings, principal component analysis, membership function

中图分类号:

闫晶秋子, 李钢铁, 刘玉军, 麻云霞, 杨颖. 基于主成分分析及隶属函数法的巨菌草幼苗耐盐碱性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(9): 1531-1540.

YAN Jingqiuzi, LI Gangtie, LIU Yujun, MA Yunxia, YANG Ying. Evaluation of salt and alkali resistance of Pennisetum giganteum Z. X. Lin seedlings based on principal component analysis and membership function method[J]. , 2019, 31(9): 1531-1540.

参考文献

[1] 朱建峰, 崔振荣, 吴春红, 等. 我国盐碱地绿化研究进展与展望[J]. 世界林业研究, 2018, 31(4): 70-75.
ZHU J F, CUI Z R, WU C H, et al.Research advances and prospect of saline and alkali land greening in China[J]. World Forestry Research, 2018, 31(4): 70-75.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] 李亮初. 浅谈盐碱地与园林绿化[J]. 科技视界, 2012(21): 283-284.
LI L C.Reflections on saline-alkali land and landscaping[J]. Science & Technology Vision, 2012(21): 283-284.(in Chinese)
[3] 林兴生, 林占熺, 林冬梅, 等. 5种菌草苗期抗盐性的评价[J]. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 42(2): 195-201.
LIN X S, LIN Z X, LIN D M, et al.Assessment on salt resistance at seedling stage of 5 species of juncao under NaCl stress[J]. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2013, 42(2): 195-201.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[4] 刘虎俊, 郭有祯, 王继和, 等. 二十八个冷季型草坪草品种的耐盐性比较[J]. 草业学报, 2001, 10(3): 52-59.
LIU H J, GUO Y Z, WANG J H, et al.A comparison on salt tolerance of 28 breeds of cold type lawn grass[J]. Acta Pratacultural Science, 2001, 10(3): 52-59.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] 贾文庆, 刘会超. NaCI胁迫对白三叶一些生理特性的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2009, 26(8): 187-189.
JIA W Q, LIU H C.Effects of NaCl stress on some physiological characteristics of white clover[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2009, 26(8): 187-189.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] 马红媛, 梁正伟, 王明明, 等. NaCl胁迫对四种禾本科牧草种子萌发的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(7): 1229-1233.
MA H Y, LIANG Z W, WANG M M, et al.Effects of NaCl stress on seed germination and seedling growth of four Poaceae grass species[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2009, 28(7): 1229-1233.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] 杜森有, 陈朋刚. 巨菌草青贮饲料饲喂肉牛的研究[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2018, 39(10): 31-32.
DU S Y, CHEN P G.Feeding effect of Pennisetum sinese Silage on beef cattle[J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2018, 39(10): 31-32.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] 王强, 左合君, 李钢铁, 等. 巨菌草留茬沙障防风固沙效益及其适宜模式研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2018, 35(5): 1234-1241.
WANG Q, ZUO H J, LI G T, et al.Windbreak and sand-fixation efficiency and suitable modes of Pennisetum giganteum sand barrier[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2018, 35(5): 1234-1241.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] 吴强, 李锦荣, 郭建英, 等. 黄河乌兰布和沙漠段巨菌草的固沙效果研究[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2018, 44(2): 50-56.
WU Q, LI J R, GUO J Y, et al.Sand fixation effect of Pennisetum giganteum Z. X. Lin in Ulanbuh desert along the Yellow River[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Forestry Science and Technology, 2018, 44(2): 50-56.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] 吴强. 黄河乌兰布和沙漠段巨菌草生长特性和防风固沙效果研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2018.
WU Q.Studies on the growth characteristics and windbreak and sand fixing effect of Pennisetum giganteum Z. X. Lin in the Yellow River section of Ulanbuh Desert[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2018.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] 刘凤山, 林兴生, 林辉, 等. 水分处理对巨菌草蒸散发过程及地上部生长的影响[J]. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 47(4): 415-419.
LIU F S, LIN X S, LIN H, et al.Effects of water treatment on evapotranspiration and aerial growth of giant juncao[J]. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 47(4): 415-419.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] 石德成,殷立娟. 盐(NaCI)与碱(Na₂CO₃)对星星草胁迫作用的差异[J].植物学报,1993, 35(2): 144-149
SHI D C,YIN L J.Difference between salt (NaCl) and alkaline (Na₂CO₃) stresses on Puccinellia tenuiflora (Griseb.) Scribn. et Merr. plants[J]. Acta Botanica Sinica, 1993, 35(2): 144-149. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] 阿曼古丽·买买提阿力, 拉扎提·努尔布拉提, 高丽丽, 等. 盐胁迫对海岛棉和陆地棉幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 植物学报, 2017, 52(4): 465-473.
AMANGUL M, LAZATI N, GAO L L, et al.Effect of salt stress on growth and physiological characteristics of sea island cotton and upland cotton cultivars[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2017, 52(4): 465-473.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] 王燕. 关于农田盐碱地治理的综合措施及农业可持续发展探讨[J]. 中国水运, 2012, 12(4): 173-174.
WANG Y.Discussion on comprehensive measures for saline-alkali land management in farmland and sustainable development of agriculture[J]. China Water Transport, 2012, 12(4): 173-174.(in Chinese)
[15] 陈建勋, 王晓峰. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 广州: 华南理工大学出版社, 2006.
[16] 李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.
[17] 郝建军, 刘延吉. 植物生理学实验技术[M]. 沈阳: 辽宁科学技术出版社, 2001.
[18] 邹琦. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[19] 郭彦宏, 张晶星, 杨永娟, 等. 六种野生广义菊属植物对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(8): 1349-1354.
GUO Y H, ZHANG J X, YANG Y J, et al.Response of six germplasms of Chrysanthemum and related genera to drought stress[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2018, 30(8): 1349-1354.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[20] 程波, 胡生荣, 高永, 等. 盐胁迫下五种紫花苜蓿萌发期抗盐性评估[J]. 北方园艺, 2018(22): 111-117.
CHENG B, HU S R, GAO Y, et al.Salt tolerance assessment of five alfalfa varieties under salt stress at germination stage[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2018(22): 111-117.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] 李玉梅. 牛叠肚幼苗对盐碱胁迫的生理响应机制研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2016.
LI Y M.Study on physiological responses mechanisms of Rubus crataegifolius Bge. seedlings under saline stress[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2016.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[22] 杨微, 郭继业, 刘翘, 等. 植物抗盐碱胁迫作用的比较分析[J]. 种子世界, 2013(9): 23-24.
YANG W, GUO J Y, LIU Q, et al.Comparison of saline-alkali stress resistance of plants[J]. Seed World, 2013(9): 23-24.(in Chinese)
[23] 李子英, 丛日春, 杨庆山, 等. 盐碱胁迫对柳树幼苗生长和渗透调节物质含量的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(24): 8511-8517.
LI Z Y, CONG R C, YANG Q S, et al.Effects of saline-alkali stress on growth and osmotic adjustment substances in willow seedlings[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(24): 8511-8517.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] HERNANDEZ J A.Antioxidant systems and $O_2^-$·/H₂O₂ production in the apoplast of pea leaves: its relation with salt-induced necrotic lesions in minor veins[J]. Plant Physiology, 2001, 127(3): 817-831.
[25] 王伟, 邓倩, 计巧灵. NaCl胁迫对6种纤维亚麻幼苗生化特性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(18): 84-88.
WANG W, DENG Q, JI Q L.Effects of NaCl stress on the biochemical characteristics in six species fiber flax seeding[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013, 29(18): 84-88.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[26] 郭立泉, 王红宇, 麻莹, 等. 星星草响应盐碱胁迫的渗透调节和离子平衡机制[J]. 东北师大学报(自然科学版), 2010, 42(2): 120-125.
GUO L Q, WANG H Y, MA Y, et al.Mechanism of osmotic adjustment and ionic balance in Puccinellia tenuiflora in response to salt and alkali stresses[J]. Journal of Northeast Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2010, 42(2): 120-125.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[27] 杨升, 刘涛, 张华新, 等. 盐胁迫下沙枣幼苗的生长表现和生理特性[J]. 福建林学院学报, 2014, 34(1): 64-70.
YANG S, LIU T, ZHANG H X, et al.Growth and physiological characteristics of Elaeagnus angustifolis L. under salt stress[J]. Journal of Fujian College of Forestry, 2014, 34(1): 64-70.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[28] 樊秀彩, 张亚冰, 刘崇怀, 等. NaCl胁迫对葡萄幼苗叶片有机渗透调节物质和膜脂过氧化的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2007, 24(6): 765-769.
FAN X C, ZHANG Y B, LIU C H, et al.Effects of NaCl stress on the contents of organic osmolytes and lipid peroxidation in grape leaves[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2007, 24(6): 765-769.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[29] 潘涛涛, 鱼小军, 肖红, 等. 12份扁蓿豆种质苗期耐盐性综合评价[J]. 草业科学, 2018, 35(11): 2650-2663.
PAN T T, YU X J, XIAO H, et al.Comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance in 12 germplasm resources of Medicago ruthenica at seedling stage[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(11): 2650-2663.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[30] 张国新, 王秀萍, 姚玉涛, 等. 主成分分析及隶属函数法对菊芋苗期耐盐性评价[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2018, 46(30): 77-79.
ZHANG G X, WANG X P, YAO Y T, et al.Salt tolerance of Helianthus tuberosus L. seedlings evaluated by principal component analysis and membership function method[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(30): 77-79.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[31] 郑涛, 樊军锋, 高建社, 等. 美洲黑杨无性系抗旱性综合评价研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2019, 34(2):104-110.
ZHENG T, FAN J F, GAO J S, et al.Comprehensive judgment on drought-resistance of Populus deltoides[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2019, 34(2): 104-110. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32] 郭栋良, 江海霞, 钟俐, 等. 不同地区亚麻萌发期耐盐碱性遗传多样性分析[J]. 新疆大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 35(3): 360-365.
GUO D L, JIANG H X, ZHONG L, et al.Genetic diversity analysis of saline-alkali tolerance of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) from different regions during the germination period[J]. Journal of Xinjiang University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 35(3): 360-365.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[33] 马彦军, 张莹花, 张荣梅, 等. 不同种源黑果枸杞抗盐性比较[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2016, 31(6): 83-88.
MA Y J, ZHANG Y H, ZHANG R M, et al.Salt resistance comparative study of Lycium ruthenicum from different provenances[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2016, 31(6): 83-88.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[34] 林兴生, 林占熺, 林辉, 等. 五种菌草苗期对碱胁迫的生理响应及抗碱性评价[J]. 植物生理学报, 2013, 49(2): 167-174.
LIN X S, LIN Z X, LIN H, et al.Physiological responses and alkaline-tolerance evaluation on 5 species of juncao under alkaline stress during seedling stage[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2013, 49(2): 167-174.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[35] 赵国栋, 赵同生, 李春敏, 等. 11个苹果野生砧木品种低温处理抗性指标的综合评价[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2018, 33(6): 145-151.
ZHAO G D, ZHAO T S, LI C M, et al.Comprehensive evaluation on cold resistance of eleven wild apple rootstocks[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2018, 33(6): 145-151.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[36] 魏永胜, 梁宗锁, 山仑, 等. 利用隶属函数值法评价苜蓿抗旱性[J]. 草业科学, 2005, 22(6): 33-36.
WEI Y S, LIANG Z S, SHAN L, et al.Comprehensive evaluation on alfalfa drought-resistance traits by subordinate function values analysis[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2005, 22(6): 33-36.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[37] 胡能兵, 庞丹丹, 隋益虎, 等. 14种辣椒对高温胁迫的生理响应及抗热性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(7): 1168-1174.
HU N B, PANG D D, SUI Y H, et al.Physiological response to heat stress and heat resistances evaluation of 14 Capsicum varieties[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2018, 30(7): 1168-1174.(in Chinese with English abstract)

基于主成分分析及隶属函数法的巨菌草幼苗耐盐碱性评价

Evaluation of salt and alkali resistance of Pennisetum giganteum Z. X. Lin seedlings based on principal component analysis and membership function method

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	崔鹏飞, 魏灵珠, 程建徽, 向江, 李明山, 吴江, . 不同砧木对天工翠玉葡萄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(1): 52-61.
[2]	张宇, 张继, 荣涛, 欧克纬, 黄国弟, 宋红霞. 杧果品种亲缘关系的CDDP分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(5): 824-830.
[3]	沈迪, 陈龙正, 路晓华, 陶建平, 冯顾城, 刘洁霞, 冯凯, 尹莲, 丁旭, 贾丽丽, 徐志胜, 刘惠吉, 熊爱生. 苏南地区29个秋冬茬芹菜品种资源评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(4): 653-660.
[4]	曹玥华, 魏灵珠, 沈碧薇, 程建徽, 向江, 吴江. 砧木对新郁葡萄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(6): 908-914.
[5]	杨红云, 周琼, 杨珺, 孙玉婷, 路艳, 殷华. 基于高光谱的水稻叶片氮素营养诊断研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(10): 1575-1582.
[6]	代琳, 徐媛媛, 熊博, 黄胜佳, 孙国超, 汪志辉. 黄果柑果实抗坏血酸、谷胱甘肽和有机酸积累特性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(8): 1341-1348.
[7]	郭彦宏, 张晶星, 杨永娟, 陈俊通, 孙明, 廖晶. 六种野生广义菊属植物对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(8): 1349-1354.
[8]	步正延, 李臻峰, 宋飞虎, 李斌, 李静. 基于太赫兹成像技术的大豆叶片水分含量测定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(8): 1420-1426.
[9]	贺礼英, 尹成杰, 黄守程, 何庆元, 舒英杰. 菜用大豆主要农艺性状的相关性、聚类及主成分分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(1): 50-57.
[10]	刘娜, 徐盛春, 张古文, 胡齐赞, 冯志娟, 龚亚明. 不同菜用大豆品种籽粒挥发性组分鉴定及其差异[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(8): 1321-1328.
[11]	韩巧玲, 赵玥, 姚立红. 基于冻融循环的土壤物理状态的自动判别[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(7): 1189-1194.
[12]	李春兰, 杨永花, 杨振坤, 王金秋, 廖伟彪. 五个观赏海棠品种抗旱性比较[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(5): 782-790.
[13]	张志仙, 何道根, 朱长志, 檀国印, 高旭. 青花菜种质资源遗传多样性的SSR分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(2): 228-235.
[14]	徐轶飞, 田晓静, 刘丽霞, 高丹丹, 陈士恩, 李明生, 刘根娣, 刘元林. 多元统计分析在地方猪种肉质评价中的应用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(12): 1970-1977.
[15]	宋勤飞, 牛素贞, 陈正武, 尹杰, 周绍均, 岑春娇. 基于主成分分析的花溪古茶树立地土壤养分评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(11): 1844-1853.