世界玉米主产国家和地区玉米补贴政策支持水平与结构特征

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2020.09.21

浙江农业学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (9): 1722-1731.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2020.09.21

世界玉米主产国家和地区玉米补贴政策支持水平与结构特征

郭延景, 肖海峰^*

中国农业大学经济管理学院,北京 100083

收稿日期:2019-12-03 出版日期:2020-09-25 发布日期:2020-10-10
通讯作者: *肖海峰,E-mail:haifengxiao@yeah.net
作者简介:郭延景(1992—),女,山东汶上人,博士研究生,研究方向为农业经济理论与政策。E-mail:gyjgyl1993@163.com
基金资助:
国家现代农业产业技术体系(CARS-39-22)

Support level and structural characteristics of maize subsidy policy in world's major maize producing countries and region

GUO Yanjing, XIAO Haifeng^*

College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2019-12-03 Online:2020-09-25 Published:2020-10-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在对美国、欧盟、巴西和中国玉米补贴政策发展历程梳理的基础上,利用经济合作与发展组织(OECD)政策评估体系对比分析了1995—2018年上述国家和地区的玉米补贴政策支持水平与结构变化。在玉米补贴政策支持水平方面,近年来,欧盟对玉米的政策支持水平最低,巴西、美国次之,而中国对玉米的政策支持水平相对较高。建议中国统筹补贴资金,适当调整对玉米的补贴额,积极引导农户逐步推进种植结构调整。在玉米补贴政策支持结构方面,美国、欧盟对玉米的政策支持以与产量挂钩的基于现期耕种面积的支持为主,巴西以市场价格支持为主,中国受玉米关税配额管理等边境贸易保护措施影响,对玉米的政策支持仍以市场价格支持为主,会对市场造成一定的扭曲。中国应继续稳妥推进玉米收储制度改革,使玉米价格由市场形成,逐步提高中国玉米的国际竞争力。

关键词: 玉米补贴政策, 支持水平, 支持结构

Abstract: Based on a review of the development of maize subsidy policy in the United States (US), the European Union (EU), Brazil and China, the policy evaluation system of Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) was used to compare and analyze the support level and structural changes of maize subsidy policies in the above countries and region from 1995 to 2018. In terms of support level of maize subsidy policy, the EU has the lowest level, and is followed by Brazil and the US. While China's policy support level for maize is relatively high. China should coordinate subsidy funds, appropriately adjust the amount of subsidies for maize, and actively guide farmers to gradually adjust the planting structure. In terms of support structure for maize subsidy policy, the policy support in the US and EU for maize is mainly payments based on current area (PC), and it is mainly market price support (MPS) in Brazil. As affected by border trade protection measures, such as maize tariff quota management, policy support for maize in China is still dominated by MPS, which has caused some distortions in the market. China should continue to push forward the reform of the maize storage system to make the maize price formed by the market, and gradually increase the international competitiveness of China's maize.

Key words: maize subsidy policy, support level, support structure

中图分类号:

S-9
F307.11

郭延景, 肖海峰. 世界玉米主产国家和地区玉米补贴政策支持水平与结构特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(9): 1722-1731.

GUO Yanjing, XIAO Haifeng. Support level and structural characteristics of maize subsidy policy in world's major maize producing countries and region[J]. , 2020, 32(9): 1722-1731.

参考文献

[1] 李朝晖, 关建波. 世界棉花主要生产国家和地区的棉花补贴政策及启示[J]. 广东农业科学, 2013, 40(14): 225-227.
LI Z H, GUAN J B.Study on the cotton subsidy policy of major cotton producing countries and regions and the policy implication[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 40(14): 225-227. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] 李登旺, 仇焕广, 吕亚荣, 等. 欧美农业补贴政策改革的新动态及其对我国的启示[J]. 中国软科学, 2015(8): 12-21.
LI D W, QIU H G, LÜ Y R, et al.Recent reforms of agricultural subsidy policies in EU and USA: implications for China[J]. China Soft Science, 2015(8):12-21. (in Chinese with English abstrac)
[3] 于晓华, 武宗励, 周洁红. 欧盟农业改革对中国的启示:国际粮食价格长期波动和国内农业补贴政策的关系[J]. 中国农村经济, 2017 (2): 84-96.
YU X H, WU Z L, ZHOU J H.The implications of the reform of common agricultural policy in the EU for China: the relationship between long-term international grain price fluctuations and domestic agricultural subsidies[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2017(2):84-96. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4] 朱满德, 程国强. 中国农业政策: 支持水平、补贴效应与结构特征[J]. 管理世界, 2011 (7): 52-60.
ZHU M D, CHENG G Q.Chinese agricultural policy: support level, subsidy effect and structural characteristics[J]. Management World, 2011 (7): 52-60. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] 张领先, 唐晓林, 王洁琼. 中美欧日韩农业支持水平及政策结构比较分析[J]. 科技管理研究, 2016, 36(18): 36-39.
ZHANG L X, TANG X L, WANG J Q.Comparative analysis on levels and structure of agricultural support policy among China, America, EU, Japan and Korea[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2016, 36(18): 36-39.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] 崔海霞, 宗义湘, 赵帮宏. 欧盟农业绿色发展支持政策体系演进分析: 基于OECD农业政策评估系统[J]. 农业经济问题, 2018, 39(5): 130-142.
CUI H X, ZONG Y X, ZHAO B H.Analysis on policy evolution and policy system of EU agricultural green development support: based on the policy evaluation of OECD[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2018, 39(5): 130-142.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] 徐更生. 美国新农业法: 取消价格和收入补贴[J]. 改革, 1996(5): 122-126.
XU G S.New American Agricultural Law: abolition of price and income subsidies[J]. Reform, 1996(5): 122-126.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] 夏益国, 刘艳华, 傅佳. 美国联邦农作物保险产品: 体系、运行机制及启示[J]. 农业经济问题, 2014, 35(4): 101-109.
XIA Y G, LIU Y H, FU J.US federal crop insurance products: system, operation mechanism and enlightenment[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2014, 35(4): 101-109.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] 陶群山. 欧盟农业保护政策的演变及启示[J]. 经济纵横, 2010(5): 110-113.
TAO Q S.Evolution and enlightenment of price support policies of agricultural products in Europe and America[J]. Economic Review, 2010(5): 110-113.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] 张虎. 发达国家农业支持政策的经验及启示: 以美国、日本、欧盟为例[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2015(12): 118-121.
ZHANG H.What China should learn from the developed countries about agricultural support policy: based on the examples from America, Japan and EU[J]. Technoeconomics & Management Research, 2015(12): 118-121.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] 王燕, 施维蓉. 简介《欧盟水框架指令》及其成功经验[J]. 环境研究与监测, 2009, 22(4): 73-75.
WANG Y, SHI W R.Brief introduction of EU Water Framework Directive and its successful experience[J]. Environmental Research and Monitoring, 2009, 22(4):73-75. (in Chinese)
[12] 张宝玉. 巴西农业最低价格保证政策三十年[J]. 国际经济评论, 1982(11): 70-73.
ZHANG B Y.Thirty years of minimum agricultural price guarantee policy in Brazil[J]. International Economic Review, 1982(11): 70-73.(in Chinese)
[13] 马欣. 中国农业国内支持水平及典型政策效果研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2015.
MA X.China's agricultural domestic support level and implementaion effects of typical policies[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2015.(in Chinese with English abstract)

[1]	金俪雯, 刘增金, 刘爱军. 猪肉销售商可追溯体系参与行为及其影响因素——基于北京、上海、济南3市636位销售商的实证分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(3): 541-552.
[2]	张莎莎, 郑循刚, 张必忠. 交通基础设施、空间溢出与农村减贫——基于面板数据的实证研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(3): 553-564.
[3]	文长存, 孙玉竹. 农户对区域指数类农业附加险购买意愿的实证研究——以河北棉花种植户为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(2): 346-354.
[4]	富丽莎, 秦涛, 潘焕学, 邓晶. 森林保险保费补贴政策的林业产出规模效应实证分析——基于双重差分模型与事件研究模型[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(2): 355-368.
[5]	李海涛, 傅琳琳, 黄祖辉, 朋文欢. 农业适度规模经营的多种形式与展望[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(1): 161-169.
[6]	董艳敏, 严奉宪. 中国农业高质量发展的时空特征与协调度[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(1): 170-182.
[7]	胡晨沛, 李辉尚, 郭昕竺. 1978—2017年中国区域农业经济发展差距与结构特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(12): 2253-2260.
[8]	李梦璐, 张社梅. 媒体负面报道对蜂蜜消费预期变动的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(12): 2282-2290.
[9]	高芸, 赵芝俊. 进口蜂蜜对我国蜂产品市场的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(11): 2088-2093.
[10]	程亚, 李欣月, 张春, 张社梅. 农业经理人压力与合作社绩效关系的实证研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(11): 2094-2102.
[11]	黄河啸, 李宝值, 朱奇彪, 杨良山, 吴敬华. 高素质农民培育的浙江实践——以浙江农艺师学院为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(10): 1890-1898.
[12]	谢庆, 瞿理铜, 闫世雄. 基于城市建设用地扩张预测的城郊村土地经营权流转最优期限确定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(10): 1899-1909.
[13]	刘姣姣, 张钢仁, 高群. 基于VEC-BEKK-GARCH和溢出指数模型的畜产品价格联动效应研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(9): 1711-1721.
[14]	张公望, 朱明芬. 农村宅基地制度改革与农民增收——基于6个试点县(市、区)面板数据的双重差分分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(8): 1475-1484.
[15]	胡巧莲, 杨君, 邵劲松, 周鹏全, 郭佳瑞, 侯满平. 田园综合体建设初期土地利用效益综合评价——以鲁家村为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(8): 1485-1492.

世界玉米主产国家和地区玉米补贴政策支持水平与结构特征

Support level and structural characteristics of maize subsidy policy in world's major maize producing countries and region

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价