碱性盐胁迫对夏蜡梅光合荧光特性影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.08.09

浙江农业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (8): 1416-1425.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.08.09

碱性盐胁迫对夏蜡梅光合荧光特性影响

周贝宁(), 毛恋, 花壮壮, 芦建国^*()

南京林业大学风景园林学院, 江苏南京 210037

收稿日期:2020-12-15 出版日期:2021-08-25 发布日期:2021-08-27
通讯作者: 芦建国
作者简介:*芦建国,E-mail: ljgnj@nju.edu.cn
周贝宁(1996—),女,浙江宁波人,硕士,研究方向为园林植物生态学。E-mail: 961721414@qq.com
基金资助:
江苏高校品牌专业建设工程(PPZY2015A063);江苏高校优势学科建设工程(PAPD)

Effects on photochemical fluorescence properties under salt-alkaline stresses about Sinocalycanthus chinensis

ZHOU Beining(), MAO Lian, HUA Zhuangzhuang, LU Jianguo^*()

College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

Received:2020-12-15 Online:2021-08-25 Published:2021-08-27
Contact: LU Jianguo

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以3年生夏蜡梅实生苗为试验材料,采用CK、0.1%、0.2%、0.3%、0.4%、0.5%、0.6%、0.7%八个碱性盐(NaHCO₃)处理水平,探究不同碱性盐胁迫对夏蜡梅光合荧光特性的影响,为夏蜡梅的生产实践栽培提供理论指导。结果表明,在NaHCO₃胁迫下,夏蜡梅净光合速率(P_n)、蒸腾速率(T_r)、气孔导度(G_s)、水分利用率(WUE)、最大净光合速率(P_nmax)和光饱和点(LSP)等光合指标均呈下降趋势且浓度越高下降越显著,胞间CO₂浓度(C_i)呈先降低后升高趋势,光补偿点(LCP)则呈上升趋势;随着NaHCO₃浓度的升高,夏蜡梅叶片的OJIP曲线逐渐出现明显K点,F_o先降低后升高,F_m、F_v、F_v/F_m和F_v/F_o呈现先升高后降低的趋势,叶片单位反应中心吸收的光能ABS/RC、热耗散的能量DI_o/RC与捕获的用于还原Q_A的能量TR_o/RC均呈先下降后上升趋势,而用于单位反应中心电子传递的能量ET_o/RC逐渐下降。碱性盐胁迫对夏蜡梅的光合系统造成了损伤,且浓度越高损伤程度越大;低浓度NaHCO₃胁迫导致夏蜡梅气孔限制净光合速率P_n降低,其对夏蜡梅叶片光化学荧光性能的抑制作用较弱,适当提高了PSⅡ反应中心活性;高浓度(>0.3%)胁迫导致夏蜡梅净光合速率P_n下降的原因可能是非气孔限制,严重破坏PSⅡ反应中心供体侧、受体侧,并导致大部分PSⅡ反应中心失活。

关键词: 夏蜡梅, 碱性盐胁迫, 光合特性, 叶绿素荧光特性

Abstract:

Three-year-old seedlings of Sinocalycanthus chinensis were used as experimental materials and set up eightalkaline salt NaHCO₃ treatment levels (CK, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5%, 0.6%, 0.7%) to explore the effects of different alkaline salt stresses on the photosynthetic fluorescence characteristics of Sinocalycanthus chinensis, whichprovided theoretical guidance for the production practice and cultivation of Sinocalycanthus chinensis. The results showed that under NaHCO₃ stress, photosynthetic indices such as net photosynthetic rate (P_n), transpiration rate (T_r), stomatal conductance (G_s), water use efficiency (WUE), maximum net photosynthetic rate (P_nmax) and light saturation point (LSP) all showed downward trends, and the higher the concentration was, the more significant the decline. The intercellular CO₂ concentration (C_i) exhibited changes of decreasing followed by increase, while the light compensation point (LCP) showed an upward trend. With the increase of NaHCO₃ concentration, the OJIP curve of Sinocalycanthus chinensis leaves gradually showed an obvious K point, and F_o exhibited changes of decreasing followed by increase, while F_m, F_v, F_v/F_m and F_v/F_o exhibited changes of increasing followed by decrease. The light energy absorbed by the unit reaction center ABS/RC, the energy dissipated by heat DI_o/RC and the energy captured for Q_A reduction TR_o/RC all exhibited changes of decreasing followed by increase, while the energy used for electron transfer in the unit reaction center ET_o/RC gradually decreased. It indicated that the alkaline salt stress caused damage to the photosynthetic system of Sinocalycanthus chinensis, and the higher the concentration was, the greater the damage degree was. Low concentration of NaHCO₃ stress caused the decrease of net photosynthetic rate P_nof Sinocalycanthus chinensis due to stomatal limitation and had a weak inhibitory effect on the photochemical fluorescence performance of leaves, which properly improved the activity of PSⅡreaction center. The reason for the decrease of P_n caused by high concentration (>0.3%) stress might be non-stomatal restriction, seriously damaging the donor side and receptor side of PSⅡreaction center and leading to the inactivation of most PSⅡreaction centers.

Key words: Sinocalycanthus chinensis, saline-alkali stress, photosynthetic characteristic, chlorophyll fluorescence characteristic

中图分类号:

S685.17

周贝宁, 毛恋, 花壮壮, 芦建国. 碱性盐胁迫对夏蜡梅光合荧光特性影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(8): 1416-1425.

ZHOU Beining, MAO Lian, HUA Zhuangzhuang, LU Jianguo. Effects on photochemical fluorescence properties under salt-alkaline stresses about Sinocalycanthus chinensis[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(8): 1416-1425.

图/表 9

参考文献 30

[1]	XIA J B, REN J Y, ZHANG S Y, et al. Forest and grass composite patterns improve the soil quality in the coastal saline-alkali land of the Yellow River Delta, China[J]. Geoderma, 2019, 349:25-35. DOI URL
[2]	MUNNS R. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2002, 25(2):239-250.
[3]	RAO P S, MISHRA B, GUPTA S R, et al. Reproductive stage tolerance to salinity and alkalinity stresses in rice genotypes[J]. Plant Breeding, 2008, 127(3):256-261. DOI URL
[4]	杨真, 王宝山. 中国盐渍土资源现状及改良利用对策[J]. 山东农业科学, 2015, 47(4):125-130.
	YANG Z, WANG B S. Present status of saline soil resources and countermeasures for improvement and utilization in China[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 47(4):125-130.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	兰伟. 夏蜡梅的繁殖技术[J]. 植物杂志, 2001(6):26.
	LAN W. Reproduction technology of[J]. Plants, 2001(6):26.(in Chinese)
[6]	张若蕙, 刘洪谔, 沈锡康, 等. 26种亚热带树种扦插繁殖试验[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 1994, 11(2):116-120.
	ZHANG RH, LIU H E, SHENG X K, et al. Cutting propagation of 26 subtropical tree species[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 1994, 11(2):116-120.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	YAN H, SHI D. Effects of Ca²⁺, ABA and H₃PO₄ on relaxing stress of Na₂CO₃ and NaCl[J]. The Journal of Applied Ecology, 2000, 11(6):889-892.
[8]	张文标. 濒危植物夏蜡梅(Sinocalycanthus chinensis)繁殖生态与遗传分化研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2007.
	ZHANG W B. Studies on reproductive ecology and genetic differentiation of the endangered species Sinocalycanthus chinensis[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2007. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	柯世省, 金则新. 干旱胁迫和复水对夏蜡梅幼苗光合生理特性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007, 13(6):1166-1172.
	KE S S, JIN Z X. Effect of drought stress and water recovering on physiological characteristics of Sinocalycanthus chinensis seedlings[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2007, 13(6):1166-1172.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	纪凯婷. 夏蜡梅幼苗年生长规律和耐盐性研究[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2014.
	JI K T. Studies on annual growth rhythm and salt-tolerance of Sinocalycanthus chinensis seedlings[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2014. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	章华婷, 金则新, 赵喆, 等. 盐胁迫对濒危植物夏蜡梅生长及光合生理特性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(7):142-146.
	ZHANG H T, JIN Z X, ZHAO Z, et al. Effects of salt stress on photosynthetic physiology and growth characteristics of endangered Sinocalycanthus chinensis[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(7):142-146.(in Chinese)
[12]	刘强, 王庆成, 王占武. 叶绿素荧光动力学参数作为植物抗盐性评价指标的有效性[J]. 广东农业科学, 2014, 41(21):37-40.
	LIU Q, WANG Q C, WANG Z W. Effectiveness of chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics parameters as evaluation index for salt tolerance of plant[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 41(21):37-40.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	GUISSÉ B, SRIVASTAVA A, STRASSER R J. Effects of high temperature and water stress on thepolyphasic chlorophyll a fluorescence transient of potato leaves[M]//Photosynbook: from light to biosphere. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1995: 3877-3880.
[14]	毛桂莲, 梁文裕, 王盛, 等. 碱性盐胁迫对宁夏枸杞生长、结构及光合参数的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017, 35(4):236-242.
	MAO G L, LIANG W Y, WANG S, et al. Effects of alkali stress on growth, structure and photosynthetic parameters of Lycium barbarum L[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2017, 35(4):236-242.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	PARIDA A K, DAS A B, MITTRA B. Effects of salt on growth, ion accumulation, photosynjournal and leaf anatomy of the mangrove, Bruguiera parviflora[J]. Trees, 2004, 18(2):167-174. DOI URL
[16]	许丽霞, 江洪, 张敏霞, 等. 安吉毛竹林生态系统光合作用特征及其环境影响因子研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2017, 39(5):928-937.
	XU L X, JIANG H, ZHANG M X, et al. Net photosynjournal and its affecting factors of bamboo forest in Anji County[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2017, 39(5):928-937.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	FARQUHAR G D, SHARKEY T D. Stomatalconductance and photosynjournal[J]. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 1982, 33(1):317-345. DOI URL
[18]	王旭明, 赵夏夏, 周鸿凯, 等. NaCl胁迫对不同耐盐性水稻某些生理特性和光合特性的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2019, 40(5):882-890.
	WANG X M, ZHAO X X, ZHOU H K, et al. Effects of NaCl stress on some physiological and biochemical indices and photosynthetic physiology characteristics of rice cultivars with different salt tolerance[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(5):882-890. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	侯智勇, 洪伟, 李键, 等. 不同桉树无性系光响应曲线研究[J]. 福建林学院学报, 2009, 29(2):114-119.
	HOU Z Y, HONG W, LI J, et al. Study on light response curve of photosynjournal of different Eucalyptus clones[J]. Journal of Fujian College of Forestry, 2009, 29(2):114-119.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	王振兴, 朱锦懋, 王健, 等. 闽楠幼树光合特性及生物量分配对光环境的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(12):3841-3848.
	WANG Z X, ZHU J M, WANG J, et al. The response of photosynthetic characters and biomass allocation of P. bournei young trees to different light regimes[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(12):3841-3848. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	王爱民, 祖元刚. 大兴安岭不同演替阶段白桦种群光合生理生态特征[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2005, 27(2):190-193.
	WANG A M, ZU Y G. Photosynthetic characteristics of birch during different succession stages in Great Xingan Mountain[J]. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 2005, 27(2):190-193.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	隋德宗, 王保松, 王伟伟. 盐胁迫对2个灌木柳无性系光响应特征的影响[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2014, 41(5):10-13.
	SUI D Z, WANG B S, WANG W W. The effects of salt stress on photosynthetic traits of two shrub willow clones[J]. Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science & Technology, 2014, 41(5):10-13.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	李学孚, 倪智敏, 吴月燕, 等. 盐胁迫对‘鄞红’葡萄光合特性及叶片细胞结构的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(13):4436-4444.
	LI X F, NI Z M, WU Y Y, et al. Effects of salt stress on photosynthetic characteristics and leaf cell structure of ‘Yinhong’ grape seedlings[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(13):4436-4444.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	孔芬, 刘小勇, 王港振, 等. 施肥量对山地核桃光合与快速叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 林业科学研究, 2016, 29(5):764-769.
	KONG F, LIU X Y, WANG G Z, et al. Effects of fertilizer dosage on photosynjournal and fast chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of Juglans regia in mountainous region[J]. Forest Research, 2016, 29(5):764-769.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	ZHANG HH, FENG P, YANG W, et al. Effects of flooding stress on the photosynthetic apparatus of leaves of two Physocarpus cultivars[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2018, 29(4):1049-1059. DOI URL
[26]	WINTERK, SCHRAMM M J. Analysis of stomatal and nonstomatal components in the environmental control of CO₂ exchange in leaves of Welwitschia mirabilis[J]. Plant Physiology, 1986, 82(1):173-178. DOI URL
[27]	许大全. 光合作用学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013: 187.
[28]	周丹丹, 刘德玺, 李存华, 等. 盐胁迫对朴树和速生白榆幼苗光合特性及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2016, 36(5):1004-1011.
	ZHOU D D, LIU D X, LI C H, et al. Photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Celtis sinensis and Ulmus pumila L. seedling under salt stress[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2016, 36(5):1004-1011.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	DAWSON S P, DENNISON W C. Effects of ultraviolet and photosynthetically active radiation on five seagrass species[J]. Marine Biology, 1996, 125(4):629-638. DOI URL
[30]	BRESTIC M, ZIVCAK M, KALAJI H M, et al. Photosystem II thermostability in situ: environmentally induced acclimation and genotype-specific reactions in Triticum aestivum L[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2012, 57:93-105. DOI URL

处理 Treatment/%	最大净光合速率 P_nmax/(μmol· m^-2·s^-1)	光饱和点 LSP/(μmol· m^-2·s^-1)	光补偿点 LCP/(μmol· m^-2·s^-1)	暗呼吸速率 R_d/(μmol· m^-2·s^-1)	表观量子效率 AQE/(mol· mol^-1)
CK	2.231 9±0.017 6 Aa	912.84±1.87 Aa	5.65±0.10 Eg	0.212 6±0.000 1 CcD	0.040 7±0.002 9 Aa
0.1	2.043 2±0.039 9 Bb	842.69±7.37 Bb	6.78±0.34 Ef	0.157 7±0.005 2 Ed	0.024 7±0.000 9 Bb
0.2	1.356 3±0.007 3 Cc	796.85±16.33 Cc	13.43±1.03 De	0.263 9±0.004 0 Aa	0.022 7±0.000 6 BbCc
0.3	0.991 6±0.000 5 Dd	797.73±14.46 Cc	13.94±0.44 De	0.231 1±0.005 3 BbC	0.019 8±0.000 7 BCcDd
0.4	0.940 4±0.010 9 De	658.89±7.91 Dd	16.94±1.22 Cd	0.242 2±0.005 5 Bb	0.017 1±0.000 1 Dd
0.5	0.303 4±0.002 1 Ef	578.94±3.58 Ee	17.93±0.61 Cc	0.070 1±0.006 2 Gf	0.004 5±0.000 2 Ee
0.6	0.196 9±0.000 3 Fg	446.95 ±0.73 Ff	19.20±0.73 Bb	0.201 1±0.005 4 cD	0.019 4±0.000 1 CcDd
0.7	0.160 5±0.006 4 Fg	430.98±4.28 Ff	21.34±0.08 Aa	0.092 7±0.001 6 Fe	0.006 2±0.000 5 Ee

处理 Treatment/%	最大净光合速率 P_nmax/(μmol· m^-2·s^-1)	光饱和点 LSP/(μmol· m^-2·s^-1)	光补偿点 LCP/(μmol· m^-2·s^-1)	暗呼吸速率 R_d/(μmol· m^-2·s^-1)	表观量子效率 AQE/(mol· mol^-1)
CK	2.231 9±0.017 6 Aa	912.84±1.87 Aa	5.65±0.10 Eg	0.212 6±0.000 1 CcD	0.040 7±0.002 9 Aa
0.1	2.043 2±0.039 9 Bb	842.69±7.37 Bb	6.78±0.34 Ef	0.157 7±0.005 2 Ed	0.024 7±0.000 9 Bb
0.2	1.356 3±0.007 3 Cc	796.85±16.33 Cc	13.43±1.03 De	0.263 9±0.004 0 Aa	0.022 7±0.000 6 BbCc
0.3	0.991 6±0.000 5 Dd	797.73±14.46 Cc	13.94±0.44 De	0.231 1±0.005 3 BbC	0.019 8±0.000 7 BCcDd
0.4	0.940 4±0.010 9 De	658.89±7.91 Dd	16.94±1.22 Cd	0.242 2±0.005 5 Bb	0.017 1±0.000 1 Dd
0.5	0.303 4±0.002 1 Ef	578.94±3.58 Ee	17.93±0.61 Cc	0.070 1±0.006 2 Gf	0.004 5±0.000 2 Ee
0.6	0.196 9±0.000 3 Fg	446.95 ±0.73 Ff	19.20±0.73 Bb	0.201 1±0.005 4 cD	0.019 4±0.000 1 CcDd
0.7	0.160 5±0.006 4 Fg	430.98±4.28 Ff	21.34±0.08 Aa	0.092 7±0.001 6 Fe	0.006 2±0.000 5 Ee

处理 Treatment/%	初始荧光 Initialfluorescence (F_o)	最大荧光 Maximum fluorescence (F_m)	可变荧光 Variable fluorescence (F_v)	最大光化学效率 Maximum photochemical efficiency(F_v/F_m)	潜在光化学效率 Potential photochemical efficiency(F_v/F_o)
CK	442.00±8.50 Bc	2 346.33±203.48 Aab	1 916.33±183.15 AaBb	0.815±0.008 Aab	4.32±0.34 Aab
0.1	439.33±7.54 Bc	2 489.00±44.47 Aab	2 036.33 ±31.75 AaB	0.818±0.006 Aab	4.64±0.10 Aab
0.2	423.00±5.86 Bc	2 391.33±32.05 Aab	1 980.33±21.53 AaBb	0.828±0.002 Aa	4.68±0.05 Aab
0.3	416.33±2.91 Bc	2 592.33±85.53 Aa	2 147.33±73.78 Aa	0.828±0.002 Aa	5.16±0.14 Aa
0.4	445.00±12.53 Bbc	2 522.67±88.38 Aab	2 083.33±79.74 AaB	0.826±0.003 Aab	4.69±0.24 Aab
0.5	470.00±3.00 Bbc	2 494.67±147.38 Aab	2 024.67±146.78 AaB	0.810±0.011 Aab	4.31±0.31 Aab
0.6	503.33±49.08 AaBb	2 376.00±105.13 Aab	1 872.67±145.33 AaBb	0.786±0.030 ABb	3.84±0.62 ABbc
0.7	552.00±10.97 Aa	2 189.00±45.21 Ab	1 637.00±56.15 Bb	0.747±0.010 Bc	2.97±0.16 Bc

处理 Treatment/%	初始荧光 Initialfluorescence (F_o)	最大荧光 Maximum fluorescence (F_m)	可变荧光 Variable fluorescence (F_v)	最大光化学效率 Maximum photochemical efficiency(F_v/F_m)	潜在光化学效率 Potential photochemical efficiency(F_v/F_o)
CK	442.00±8.50 Bc	2 346.33±203.48 Aab	1 916.33±183.15 AaBb	0.815±0.008 Aab	4.32±0.34 Aab
0.1	439.33±7.54 Bc	2 489.00±44.47 Aab	2 036.33 ±31.75 AaB	0.818±0.006 Aab	4.64±0.10 Aab
0.2	423.00±5.86 Bc	2 391.33±32.05 Aab	1 980.33±21.53 AaBb	0.828±0.002 Aa	4.68±0.05 Aab
0.3	416.33±2.91 Bc	2 592.33±85.53 Aa	2 147.33±73.78 Aa	0.828±0.002 Aa	5.16±0.14 Aa
0.4	445.00±12.53 Bbc	2 522.67±88.38 Aab	2 083.33±79.74 AaB	0.826±0.003 Aab	4.69±0.24 Aab
0.5	470.00±3.00 Bbc	2 494.67±147.38 Aab	2 024.67±146.78 AaB	0.810±0.011 Aab	4.31±0.31 Aab
0.6	503.33±49.08 AaBb	2 376.00±105.13 Aab	1 872.67±145.33 AaBb	0.786±0.030 ABb	3.84±0.62 ABbc
0.7	552.00±10.97 Aa	2 189.00±45.21 Ab	1 637.00±56.15 Bb	0.747±0.010 Bc	2.97±0.16 Bc

处理 Treatment/%	单位反应中心吸收的光能ABS/RC	单位反应中心热耗散的能量DI_o/RC	单位反应中心还原Q_A的能量TR_o/RC	单位反应中心电子传递的能量ET_o/RC
CK	2.81±0.22 Aab	0.52±0.06 Bbc	2.29±0.16 Aab	0.807±0.033 Aa
0.1	2.62±0.12 Ab	0.48±0.04 Bbc	2.15±0.08 Aab	0.783±0.005 Aa
0.2	2.67±0.13 Ab	0.46±0.03 Bbc	2.21±0.10 Aab	0.736±0.033 AaB
0.3	2.46±0.09 Ab	0.42±0.02 Bc	2.04±0.07 Ab	0.708±0.004 AaB
0.4	2.59±0.05 Ab	0.45±0.01 Bbc	2.14±0.04 Aab	0.718±0.017 AaB
0.5	2.71±0.19 Aab	0.52±0.07 Bbc	2.19±0.13 Aab	0.718±0.032 AaB
0.6	2.95±0.28 Aab	0.65±0.15 AaBb	2.30±0.12 Aab	0.681±0.057 AaB
0.7	3.24±0.17 Aa	0.82±0.01 Aa	2.43±0.16 Aa	0.496±0.133 Bb

碱性盐胁迫对夏蜡梅光合荧光特性影响

Effects on photochemical fluorescence properties under salt-alkaline stresses about Sinocalycanthus chinensis

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘艳伟, 周潇, 杨启良, 茶品元. 不同施肥和灌溉水平对三七生长特性和发病率的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(8): 1426-1435.
[2]	唐红, 黄滔, 刘玮, 黄程前, 黄文韬, 郑硕理, 陈白冰. 四个观赏海棠品种光合特性比较研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(5): 846-854.
[3]	王铁, 黄胜佳, 杨友婷, 谭丽平, 邱霞, 董甜甜, 黎思辰, 孙国超, 熊博, 王均, 汪志辉. 不同中间砧对媛小春柑橘生长与光合特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(3): 413-421.
[4]	孙德智, 杨恒山, 张庆国, 范富, 苏雅乐其其格, 彭靖, 韩晓日. 外源一氧化氮供体硝普钠对番茄幼苗盐胁迫伤害的缓解作用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(8): 1286-1294.
[5]	杨亚娜, 樊小雪, 徐刚, 张宇, 李亚灵, 温祥珍. 不同红蓝LED光照强度和灌溉量交互作用对番茄幼苗生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(5): 737-745.
[6]	常雯雯, 刘吉利, 吴娜, 张永乾, 何海锋. 西北盐碱地区不同柳枝稷品种光合特性与产量比较[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(10): 1647-1654.
[7]	郭彦宏, 张晶星, 杨永娟, 陈俊通, 孙明, 廖晶. 六种野生广义菊属植物对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(8): 1349-1354.
[8]	王虹, 王颖, 阎君, 朱为民. 不同比例的红蓝光对黄瓜幼苗生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(11): 1879-1885.
[9]	侯维, 马旭辉, 张皓月, 陈其阳, 张勇. 夏季遮荫对月季叶片PSⅡ活性和抗氧化系统的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(9): 1530-1537.
[10]	薛杨1，2，景元书1，2，*，谭孟祥1，2. 钾肥对晚稻叶片生理特性及产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(6): 901-.
[11]	李治鑫1，2，李鑫1，，韩文炎1，. 外源24表油菜素内酯诱导茶树（Camellia sinensis L.）耐热性的生理机制[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(6): 959-.
[12]	廖玲1，曹淑燕1，荣毅1，古咸杰1，李清南1，叶霜1，邱霞1，汪志辉1，2，*. 不同砧木对黄果柑光合特性、光合作用关键酶及其基因表达的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(5): 769-.
[13]	王明友，张红，李士平，井大炜. 西瓜在结瓜初期光合特性和生长对不同程度缺氮的响应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(3): 457-.
[14]	赵小霞, 何文寿, 张峰举, 曹哲, 党柯柯, 俞晓红, 陈天祥. 施肥对碱化土油用向日葵光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(10): 1755-1763.
[15]	张慧琴，马常念，谢鸣*，肖金平，周利秋. 东溪小仙桃对淹水胁迫的生理响应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(6): 976-.