安格斯牛体重和体尺性状生长曲线拟合与相关性分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.01.07

浙江农业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 50-59.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.01.07

安格斯牛体重和体尺性状生长曲线拟合与相关性分析

冯小芳¹(), 蒋秋斐², 封元², 王瑜², 陈亚飞¹, 母童¹, 黎明³, 周子航¹, 蔡正云¹, 张娟¹, 顾亚玲¹^,^*()

1.宁夏大学农学院,宁夏银川 750021
2.宁夏畜牧工作站,宁夏银川 750001
3.海原县九彩乡人民政府,宁夏海原 755200

收稿日期:2021-05-18 出版日期:2022-01-25 发布日期:2022-02-05
通讯作者: 顾亚玲
作者简介:* 顾亚玲,E-mail: guyaling@sina.com
冯小芳(1993—),女,宁夏固原人,博士研究生,研究方向为动物遗传育种与繁殖。E-mail: xiaofangf@yeah.net
基金资助:
宁夏回族自治区畜牧工作站:宁夏安格斯牛核心群建设项目;宁夏自然科学基金(2021AAC03005)

Growth curve fitting and correlation analysis of body weight and body measurements in Angus cattle

FENG Xiaofang¹(), JIANG Qiufei², FENG Yuan², WANG Yu², CHEN Yafei¹, MU Tong¹, LI Ming³, ZHOU Zihang¹, CAI Zhengyun¹, ZHANG Juan¹, GU Yaling¹^,^*()

1. Agricultural College, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
2. Animal Husbandry Extension Station,Yinchuan 750001, China
3. Jiucai Township Haiyuan County People’s Government, Haiyuan 755200,Ningxia, China

Received:2021-05-18 Online:2022-01-25 Published:2022-02-05
Contact: GU Yaling

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为充分了解安格斯牛生长发育规律,指导饲养管理和提高品种选育,以安格斯牛为研究对象,通过Logistic、Gompertz和Von Bertalanffy 3种曲线模型对0~18月龄安格斯牛体重和体尺性状进行生长曲线拟合分析,并选出最佳生长曲线模型,利用该模型计算体重和体尺的相对生长(R)和绝对生长(G)情况,并对各性状进行简单的相关性分析。结果表明:Von Bertalanffy模型对体重和体尺性状均具有最佳的拟合效果,该模型估计的体重生长拐点为(8.33月龄、245.13 kg);分析各性状的生长发育规律发现,体重和体尺性状的生长强度随月龄的增加逐渐下降,且体重在0~10月龄生长速率达到最大,随后逐渐下降。各性状间的相关性分析表明,体重与体尺性状间均为极显著强正相关(P<0.01),表明体重和体尺性状存在正向选择关系。以上结果体现了安格斯牛早熟性和早期生长强度大、增重速率高的优势。

关键词: 安格斯牛, 生长曲线, 相对生长, 绝对生长, 相关分析

Abstract:

The research was performed on Angus cattle to understand their growth and development patterns, and make relevant predictions to guide feeding management and improve breed selection. Logistic, Gompertz, and Von Bertalanffy models were used to fit the growth curves for weight and body size traits in Angus cattle from 0 to 18 months of age, and to choose the best growth curve model. The model was then applied to calculate relative growth (R) and absolute growth (G) of weight and body size, and simple correlation analysis was performed for each trait. The results showed that Von Bertalanffy model was the best fit for weight and body size traits, and the model estimated the inflection point of weight growth as (8.33 months of age, 245.13 kg). Growth pattern of each trait was analyzed, and it was found that the growing intensity of weight and body size traits decreased gradually with the increase of monthly age, and growth rate of weight reached the maximum from 0 to 10 months of age then decreased gradually. The correlation analysis among the traits showed a strong positive correlation between body weight and body size traits (P<0.01), indicating a positive selection relationship between body weight and body size traits. The above results demonstrated the advantages of early maturity and high early growth intensity and weight gain rate of Angus cattle.

Key words: Angus cattle, growth curve, relative growth, absolute growth, correlation analysis

中图分类号:

S823.8

冯小芳, 蒋秋斐, 封元, 王瑜, 陈亚飞, 母童, 黎明, 周子航, 蔡正云, 张娟, 顾亚玲. 安格斯牛体重和体尺性状生长曲线拟合与相关性分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(1): 50-59.

FENG Xiaofang, JIANG Qiufei, FENG Yuan, WANG Yu, CHEN Yafei, MU Tong, LI Ming, ZHOU Zihang, CAI Zhengyun, ZHANG Juan, GU Yaling. Growth curve fitting and correlation analysis of body weight and body measurements in Angus cattle[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(1): 50-59.

图/表 7

参考文献 32

[1]	BROWN J E, FITZHUGH H A, CARTWRIGHT T C. A comparison of nonlinear models for describing weight-age relationships in cattle[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 1976, 42(4): 810-818. DOI URL
[2]	TARIP M M, IQBAL F, EYDURAN E, et al. Comparison of non-linear functions to describe the growth in Mengali sheep breed of Balochistan[J]. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 2013, 45(3): 661-665.
[3]	DA SILVA L S A, FRAGA A B, DA SILVA F D L, et al. Growth curve in Santa Inês sheep[J]. Small Ruminant Research, 2012, 105(1/2/3): 182-185. DOI URL
[4]	FITZHUGH H A. Analysis of growth curves and strategies for altering their shape[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 1976, 42(4): 1036-1051. DOI URL
[5]	杨运清, 缪尧源. 动物生长曲线拟合方法的探讨[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 1992, 23(3): 219-224.
	YANG Y Q, MIAO Y Y. Preliminary discussion on the fitting methods of animal growth curves[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 1992, 23(3): 219-224.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	杨运清. 动物生长模型的优化拟合方法[J]. 数理统计与管理, 1991, 10(5): 43-48.
	YANG Y Q. Optimal fitting method of animal growth model[J]. Application of Statistics and Management, 1991, 10(5): 43-48.(in Chinese)
[7]	赵青, 赵艳, 钟土木, 等. 金华猪生长激素基因多态性分析及生长曲线比较[J]. 中国兽医学报, 2009, 29(12): 1632-1635.
	ZHAO Q, ZHAO Y, ZHONG T M, et al. Polymorphism of growth hormone gene and fitting of growth equation in Jinhua pigs[J]. Chinese Journal of Veterinary Science, 2009, 29(12): 1632-1635.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	王玲, 左福元, 周沛, 等. 不同性别的川南山地黄牛生长曲线分析[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 35(3): 204-207.
	WANG L, ZUO F Y, ZHOU P, et al. Analysis of growth curve of male and female Chuannan mountainous cattle[J]. Journal of Southwest China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2010, 35(3): 204-207.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	张文举. 徽成盆地黄牛生长曲线方程的研究[J]. 甘肃畜牧兽医, 1998, 28(1): 4-7.
	ZHANG W J. Study on the growth curve equation of Yellow cattle in Huicheng Basin[J]. Gansu Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 1998, 28(1): 4-7.(in Chinese)
[10]	姚亚铃, 陈斌, 李青. 湘西黄牛母牛生长曲线的探讨[J]. 中国牛业科学, 2006, 32(1): 17-18.
	YAO Y L, CHEN B, LI Q. Study on the growth curves of female Xiangxi cattle[J]. China Cattle Science, 2006, 32(1): 17-18.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	梁永虎, 朱波, 金生云, 等. 肉用西门塔尔牛群体生长曲线拟合及体重与体尺相关性分析的研究[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2018, 49(3): 497-506.
	LIANG Y H, ZHU B, JIN S Y, et al. The growth curve fitting and the correlation analysis between body weight and body measurements in Chinese Simmental beef cattle population[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 2018, 49(3): 497-506.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	王梦琦, 唐程, 倪炜, 等. 不同产犊季节对荷斯坦牛生长曲线拟合的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2018, 49(11): 2311-2319.
	WANG M Q, TANG C, NI W, et al. Effects of calving seasons on growth curve fitting of Holstein cattle[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2018, 49(11): 2311-2319.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	牛志刚, 史洪才, 刘明军, 等. 新疆褐牛POU1F1基因多态性分析及早期生长曲线比较[J]. 西北农业学报, 2011, 20(11): 1-5.
	NIU Z G, SHI H C, LIU M J, et al. Polymorphism of POU1F1 gene and fitting of early growth curve in Xinjiang brown cattle[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2011, 20(11): 1-5.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	闫向民, 李娜, 邵伟, 等. 新疆褐牛及杂交后代生长曲线拟合研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2016, 53(3): 569-574.
	YAN X M, LI N, SHAO W, et al. Study on growth curve fitting of Xinjiang brown cattle and their hybrids[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 53(3): 569-574.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	刘丽元, 周靖航, 李金芝, 等. 新疆褐牛母牛早期生长曲线拟合研究[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2015, 51(19): 4-8.
	LIU L Y, ZHOU J H, LI J Z, et al. Fitting of the early growth curve for growing Xinjiang brown cattle[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2015, 51(19): 4-8.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	王玲, 左福元, 周沛. 安格斯杂种后代生长曲线拟合分析[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2007(9): 37-38.
	WANG L, ZUO F Y, ZHOU P. Growth curve fitting analysis of Angus hybrid progeny[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2007(9): 37-38.(in Chinese)
[17]	左福元, 王玲, 周沛, 等. 三峡库区川南山地黄牛及杂种后代生长曲线拟合分析[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2010, 46(9): 1-4.
	ZUO F Y, WANG L, ZHOU P, et al. Analysis of growth curve of Chuannan mountainous cattles and their hybrids in Three Gorges reservoir area[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2010, 46(9): 1-4.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	陈江凌, 汪聪勇, 耿繁军. 种公牛早期生长曲线分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2014, 42(14): 4352-4353.
	CHEN J L, WANG C Y, GENG F J. Analysis of growth curve of growing bulls[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 42(14): 4352-4353.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	陈文成, 王爱国, 叶健. 利用SAS软件拟合猪生长曲线并制作校正公式[J]. 当代畜禽养殖业, 2019(7): 3-5.
	CHEN W C, WANG A G, YE J. Fitting pig growth curve and making correction formula by SAS software[J]. Modern Animal Husbandry, 2019(7): 3-5.(in Chinese)
[20]	鲁绍雄, 连林生. SAS统计分析系统在畜牧科学中的应用[M]. 昆明: 云南科技出版社, 2003: 139.
[21]	冯小芳, 虎红红, 封元, 等. 主成分和回归分析在安格斯牛选育中的应用[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 48(7): 1-8.
	FENG X F, HU H H, FENG Y, et al. Application of principal component and regression analysis in Angus cattle breeding[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 48(7): 1-8.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	王晓博. 生长曲线模型参数的三种有偏估计[D]. 郑州: 华北水利水电大学, 2016.
	WANG X B. Three kinds of estimation for coefficients in the growth curve model[D]. Zhengzhou: North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	赵旺, 胡静, 马振华, 等. 尖吻鲈幼鱼形态性状对体质量影响的通径分析及生长曲线拟合[J]. 南方农业学报, 2017, 48(9): 1700-1707.
	ZHAO W, HU J, MA Z H, et al. Path analysis and growth curve fitting of morphological traits to body weight of juvenile Lates calcarifer[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2017, 48(9): 1700-1707.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	刘双艳, 肖秀孝, 应豪, 等. 腾冲雪鸡生长曲线分析与拟合的研究[J]. 中国家禽, 2016, 38(9): 45-47.
	LIU S Y, XIAO X X, YING H, et al. Study on growth curve analysis and fitting of Tengchong snow chicken[J]. China Poultry, 2016, 38(9): 45-47.(in Chinese)
[25]	张勇, 郭武君, 李晓梅, 等. 甘肃高山细毛羊羔羊生长曲线模型选择及生长曲线分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2016, 45(9): 125-129.
	ZHANG Y, GUO W J, LI X M, et al. Growth curve model selection and growth curve analysis of Gansu alpine merino lambs[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 45(9): 125-129.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	DARMANI KUHI H, KEBREAB E, LOPEZ S, et al. An evaluation of different growth functions for describing the profile of live weight with time (age) in meat and egg strains of chicken[J]. Poultry Science, 2003, 82(10): 1536-1543. DOI URL
[27]	DE BEHR V, HORNICK J L, CABARAUX J F, et al. Growth patterns of Belgian Blue replacement heifers and growing males in commercial farms[J]. Livestock Production Science, 2001, 71(2/3): 121-130. DOI URL
[28]	张丽, 张良志, 张爱玲, 等. 南阳黄牛体重曲线拟合的比较分析[J]. 广东海洋大学学报, 2008, 28(1): 98-100.
	ZHANG L, ZHANG L Z, ZHANG A L, et al. Growth curve analysis of body weight of Nanyang cattle[J]. Journal of Guangdong Ocean University, 2008, 28(1): 98-100.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	罗宗刚, 王玲, 伏彭辉, 等. 三峡库区不同杂交组合肉牛生长曲线拟合分析[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2018, 36(5): 696-701, 707.
	LUO Z G, WANG L, FU P H, et al. Analysis of growth curve of different cross combinations of beef cattle in Three Gorges reservoir area[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2018, 36(5): 696-701, 707.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	BELTRÁN J J, BUTTS W T, OLSON T A, et al. Growth patterns of two lines of Angus cattle selected using predicted growth parameters[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 1992, 70(3): 734-741. DOI URL
[31]	周清元, 张建奎, 王季春, 等. 甘薯早代品系部分数量性状的遗传相关分析[J]. 西南农业大学学报, 2001, 23(3): 222-224, 266.
	ZHOU Q Y, ZHANG J K, WANG J C, et al. Study on heredity and correlation of some quantitative characters of sweet potato in their early generation strains[J]. Journal of Southwest Agricultural University, 2001, 23(3): 222-224, 266.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	崔翠, 周清元, 蒲海斌, 等. 甘薯部分数量性状的遗传力及其相关分析[J]. 西南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 26(5): 560-562.
	CUI C, ZHOU Q Y, PU H B, et al. Study on heritability and coorelation of some quantitative characters in sweet potato[J]. Journal of Southwest Agricultural University(Natural Science Edition), 2004, 26(5): 560-562.(in Chinese with English abstract)

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

1138

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	23	0	0	1115

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	813	325
比例	71%	29%

摘要

739

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	738

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	738	1
比例	100%	0%

月龄 Month of age	数量 Numbers	体重 Body weight/kg	体高 Body height/cm	体斜长 Body length/cm	胸围 Chest girth/cm	腹围 Abdomen circumference/cm	管围 Shin circumference/cm	十字部高 Height at hip cross/cm
0	669	31.09±3.13	92.20±6.22	94.65±7.46	94.83±6.47	96.59±6.71	9.12±0.97	93.64±6.41
2	339	99.12±3.19	92.13±5.94	96.16±8.19	109.50±9.73	116.69±13.37	12.42±1.06	96.80±7.91
4	619	153.90±5.42	100.61±8.28	103.80±10.08	124.36±14.10	143.97±11.50	13.62±1.16	102.54±7.41
6	809	226.74±18.27	106.69±2.98	113.08±5.64	136.94±15.91	164.98±12.15	14.81±3.60	109.57±3.58
8	336	231.80±22.74	106.97±3.41	117.90±4.78	145.89±9.06	172.98±9.52	15.46±1.19	109.90±3.66
10	225	287.48±56.89	110.01±5.94	121.30±12.49	149.15±12.70	183.17±14.36	16.61±1.11	117.01±8.46
12	1 457	317.37±56.70	114.76±6.82	126.96±10.51	157.35±16.40	186.91±16.79	17.12±1.37	119.29±7.15
14	275	345.84±61.62	122.74±12.19	133.96±11.25	166.65±16.64	196.60±13.74	17.48±1.11	125.95±12.95
16	152	435.61±76.49	126.16±5.21	142.21±7.88	183.80±14.81	206.43±12.10	18.90±1.30	128.74±5.73
18	549	480.03±74.76	128.54±7.16	146.70±11.30	187.96±14.99	211.42±18.97	18.97±1.49	129.48±7.15

月龄 Month of age	数量 Numbers	体重 Body weight/kg	体高 Body height/cm	体斜长 Body length/cm	胸围 Chest girth/cm	腹围 Abdomen circumference/cm	管围 Shin circumference/cm	十字部高 Height at hip cross/cm
0	669	31.09±3.13	92.20±6.22	94.65±7.46	94.83±6.47	96.59±6.71	9.12±0.97	93.64±6.41
2	339	99.12±3.19	92.13±5.94	96.16±8.19	109.50±9.73	116.69±13.37	12.42±1.06	96.80±7.91
4	619	153.90±5.42	100.61±8.28	103.80±10.08	124.36±14.10	143.97±11.50	13.62±1.16	102.54±7.41
6	809	226.74±18.27	106.69±2.98	113.08±5.64	136.94±15.91	164.98±12.15	14.81±3.60	109.57±3.58
8	336	231.80±22.74	106.97±3.41	117.90±4.78	145.89±9.06	172.98±9.52	15.46±1.19	109.90±3.66
10	225	287.48±56.89	110.01±5.94	121.30±12.49	149.15±12.70	183.17±14.36	16.61±1.11	117.01±8.46
12	1 457	317.37±56.70	114.76±6.82	126.96±10.51	157.35±16.40	186.91±16.79	17.12±1.37	119.29±7.15
14	275	345.84±61.62	122.74±12.19	133.96±11.25	166.65±16.64	196.60±13.74	17.48±1.11	125.95±12.95
16	152	435.61±76.49	126.16±5.21	142.21±7.88	183.80±14.81	206.43±12.10	18.90±1.30	128.74±5.73
18	549	480.03±74.76	128.54±7.16	146.70±11.30	187.96±14.99	211.42±18.97	18.97±1.49	129.48±7.15

性状Traits	模型Model	A	B	k	P value	SS	R²
BW	Logistic	585.90	6.459 8	0.178 2	<0.000 1	6 397.00	0.992 6
	Gompertz	712.30	2.370 1	0.095 1	<0.000 1	4 936.90	0.994 3
	Von Bertalanffy	827.30	0.580 4	0.066 6	<0.000 1	4 365.50	0.994 9
BH	Logistic	113.50	1.811 4	0.034 1	<0.000 1	35.70	0.999 7
	Gompertz	131.10	1.512 1	0.014 7	<0.000 1	35.71	0.999 7
	Von Bertalanffy	156.40	0.475 3	0.008 2	<0.000 1	35.71	0.999 7
BL	Logistic	160.10	2.029 3	0.043 7	<0.000 1	25.28	0.999 8
	Gompertz	171.80	1.595 9	0.018 6	<0.000 1	25.19	0.999 8
	Von Bertalanffy	182.70	0.492 6	0.010 3	<0.000 1	25.17	0.999 8
CG	Logistic	229.80	1.324 8	0.096 7	<0.000 1	146.00	0.999 3
	Gompertz	251.60	0.941 9	0.063 7	<0.000 1	132.30	0.999 4
	Von Bertalanffy	264.00	0.281 7	0.052 7	<0.000 1	127.80	0.999 4
AC	Logistic	212.50	1.172 6	0.207 4	<0.000 1	148.50	0.999 5
	Gompertz	217.70	0.813 7	0.159 2	<0.000 1	118.10	0.999 6
	Von Bertalanffy	220.10	0.241 5	0.143 1	<0.000 1	111.00	0.999 6
SC	Logistic	19.35	0.953 1	0.181 8	<0.000 1	2.30	0.999 1
	Gompertz	19.68	0.700 6	0.146 1	<0.000 1	1.92	0.999 2
	Von Bertalanffy	19.83	0.211 6	0.134 1	<0.000 1	1.79	0.999 3
HC	Logistic	158.50	0.707 2	0.067 2	<0.000 1	19.25	0.999 9
	Gompertz	168.80	0.598 8	0.047 6	<0.000 1	19.12	0.999 9
	Von Bertalanffy	174.00	0.189 1	0.041 0	<0.000 1	18.73	0.999 9

性状Traits	模型Model	A	B	k	P value	SS	R²
BW	Logistic	585.90	6.459 8	0.178 2	<0.000 1	6 397.00	0.992 6
	Gompertz	712.30	2.370 1	0.095 1	<0.000 1	4 936.90	0.994 3
	Von Bertalanffy	827.30	0.580 4	0.066 6	<0.000 1	4 365.50	0.994 9
BH	Logistic	113.50	1.811 4	0.034 1	<0.000 1	35.70	0.999 7
	Gompertz	131.10	1.512 1	0.014 7	<0.000 1	35.71	0.999 7
	Von Bertalanffy	156.40	0.475 3	0.008 2	<0.000 1	35.71	0.999 7
BL	Logistic	160.10	2.029 3	0.043 7	<0.000 1	25.28	0.999 8
	Gompertz	171.80	1.595 9	0.018 6	<0.000 1	25.19	0.999 8
	Von Bertalanffy	182.70	0.492 6	0.010 3	<0.000 1	25.17	0.999 8
CG	Logistic	229.80	1.324 8	0.096 7	<0.000 1	146.00	0.999 3
	Gompertz	251.60	0.941 9	0.063 7	<0.000 1	132.30	0.999 4
	Von Bertalanffy	264.00	0.281 7	0.052 7	<0.000 1	127.80	0.999 4
AC	Logistic	212.50	1.172 6	0.207 4	<0.000 1	148.50	0.999 5
	Gompertz	217.70	0.813 7	0.159 2	<0.000 1	118.10	0.999 6
	Von Bertalanffy	220.10	0.241 5	0.143 1	<0.000 1	111.00	0.999 6
SC	Logistic	19.35	0.953 1	0.181 8	<0.000 1	2.30	0.999 1
	Gompertz	19.68	0.700 6	0.146 1	<0.000 1	1.92	0.999 2
	Von Bertalanffy	19.83	0.211 6	0.134 1	<0.000 1	1.79	0.999 3
HC	Logistic	158.50	0.707 2	0.067 2	<0.000 1	19.25	0.999 9
	Gompertz	168.80	0.598 8	0.047 6	<0.000 1	19.12	0.999 9
	Von Bertalanffy	174.00	0.189 1	0.041 0	<0.000 1	18.73	0.999 9

生长模型 Growth model	拐点体重 Inflection point weight/kg	拐点月龄 Inflection point age/month	最大月增重 Maximum daily gain/kg
Logistic	292.95	10.47	26.10
Gompertz	262.04	9.07	24.92
Von Bertalanffy	245.13	8.33	24.49

安格斯牛体重和体尺性状生长曲线拟合与相关性分析

Growth curve fitting and correlation analysis of body weight and body measurements in Angus cattle

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 32

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

性状 Traits		月龄Month of age
性状 Traits		0	2	4	6	8	10	12	14	16	18
BW	B	61.12	98.52	141.69	188.51	237.12	285.98	333.89	379.98	423.64	464.50
	G/kg	—	18.70	21.59	23.41	24.30	24.43	23.96	23.04	21.83	20.43
	R/%	—	0.61	0.44	0.33	0.26	0.21	0.17	0.14	0.11	0.10
BH	B	88.57	92.53	96.55	100.62	104.72	108.87	113.06	117.28	121.54	125.82
	G/cm	—	1.98	2.01	2.03	2.05	2.07	2.09	2.11	2.13	2.14
	R/%	—	0.04	0.04	0.04	0.04	0.04	0.04	0.04	0.04	0.04
BL	B	93.25	98.89	104.64	110.49	116.42	122.43	128.52	134.68	140.89	147.17
	G/cm	—	2.82	2.87	2.92	2.97	3.01	3.04	3.08	3.11	3.14
	R/%	—	0.06	0.06	0.06	0.05	0.05	0.05	0.05	0.05	0.04
CG	B	97.84	109.81	121.39	132.48	143.02	152.98	162.32	171.04	179.16	186.68
	G/cm	—	5.99	5.79	5.55	5.27	4.98	4.67	4.36	4.06	3.76
	R/%	—	0.12	0.11	0.09	0.08	0.07	0.06	0.05	0.05	0.04
AC	B	96.05	120.74	141.84	159.21	173.15	184.14	192.69	199.29	204.34	208.19
	G/cm	—	0.26	0.17	0.12	0.09	0.06	0.05	0.03	0.03	0.02
	R/%	—	0.26	0.17	0.12	0.09	0.06	0.05	0.03	0.03	0.02
SC	B	9.72	11.68	13.34	14.72	15.83	16.72	17.42	17.97	18.40	18.73
	G/cm	—	0.98	0.83	0.69	0.56	0.44	0.35	0.27	0.21	0.17
	R/%	—	0.20	0.14	0.10	0.08	0.06	0.04	0.03	0.02	0.02
HC	L	92.78	97.98	102.95	107.67	112.14	116.37	120.36	124.11	127.64	130.95
	G/cm	—	2.60	2.48	2.36	2.24	2.11	1.99	1.88	1.76	1.65
	R/%	—	0.06	0.05	0.05	0.04	0.04	0.03	0.03	0.03	0.03

性状Traits	BW	BH	BL	CG	AC	SC	HC
BW	1	0.982 7	0.990 5	0.994 8	0.969 5	0.971 3	0.984 2
BH	<0.000 1	1	0.993 9	0.984 3	0.956 3	0.941 0	0.990 6
BL	<0.0001	<0.000 1	1	0.990 9	0.960 0	0.949 0	0.989 3
CG	<0.000 1	<0.0001	<0.000 1	1	0.980 6	0.978 8	0.985 4
AC	<0.000 1	<0.000 1	<0.000 1	<0.0001	1	0.987 6	0.973 3
SC	<0.000 1	<0.000 1	<0.000 1	<0.0001	<0.000 1	1	0.964 5
HC	<0.000 1	<0.000 1	<0.000 1	<0.0001	<0.000 1	<0.000 1	1

[1]	兰挚谦, 张凯歌, 张雪艳. 耕层厚度对黄瓜叶片光合荧光与根系生理特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(7): 1196-1205.
[2]	邓天天, 陈曦, 侯宇梦. 不同环境条件下联合共生固氮菌对小麦种子生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(6): 886-892.
[3]	贺礼英, 尹成杰, 黄守程, 何庆元, 舒英杰. 菜用大豆主要农艺性状的相关性、聚类及主成分分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(1): 50-57.
[4]	吕月珍, 邵永新, 钱野, 潘扬. 农业科技创新投入对新农村经济发展影响的研究—以杭州为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(5): 850-856.
[5]	李桂萍, 张根生, 巴青松, 张改生. 杂种小麦品质性状的性状相关和主成分分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(9): 1447-1453.
[6]	黄聪1，2，赵小敏2，*，郭熙1，2，谢文1，2，张佳佳1，2，叶英聪1，2. 多维视角下江西省余江县农村居民点分布特征及其影响因素[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(8): 1428-.
[7]	刘小辉1，2，李祥龙1，*，李杰1，逯春香1. 坝上长尾鸡育雏育成期生长曲线拟合研究 [J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(5): 746-.
[8]	田和彬;汪军妹;华为;杨建明;*. 大麦主要农艺和品质性状的相关性及灰色关联度分析[J]. , 2011, 23(3): 0-438.
[9]	詹兰兰;活泼;刘左军;徐姚力. 两株优良酸奶发酵菌株的生长特性[J]. , 2011, 23(1): 144-149.
[10]	包海柱;张凤英;刘志萍;李艳玉. 啤用大麦主要农艺性状对产量及部分酿造品质的影响[J]. , 2010, 22(6): 808-812.
[11]	邱红波;牛素贞;*;赵利辉;蒋维. 美国BSSS玉米群体农艺性状分析[J]. , 2010, 22(5): 609-612.
[12]	孙健;张翠英;岳瑞雪;李洪民;张爱君. 甘薯品质特性与乙醇产量相关性[J]. , 2010, 22(5): 613-617.
[13]	徐如海;胡锦平;翁经强;褚晓红;黄少珍. 连续日称重杜洛克公猪的生长曲线分析[J]. , 2007, 19(5): 0-345.
[14]	戴国俊;王金玉;王志跃;吴圣龙;谢恺舟. 新扬州鸡不同环境体重体尺生长曲线拟合研究[J]. , 2005, 17(6): 0-375.
[15]	陶志伦;项云. 金华猪生长曲线探讨[J]. , 2004, 16(2): 0-101.