中国梨木虱翅型变化及其影响因素初探

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.01.15

浙江农业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 120-127.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.01.15

中国梨木虱翅型变化及其影响因素初探

赵龙龙¹^,²(), 卫洁³, 谢映平¹, 李捷⁴

1.山西大学生命科学学院,山西太原 030006
2.山西农业大学果树研究所,山西晋中 030815
3.山西农业大学植物保护学院,山西晋中 030801
4.山西农业大学园艺学院,山西晋中 030801

收稿日期:2021-01-15 出版日期:2022-01-25 发布日期:2022-02-05
作者简介:赵龙龙(1984—),男,甘肃庆阳人,博士,副研究员,主要从事果树病虫害的综合治理研究。E-mail: xiaoxiaolong007@outlook.com
基金资助:
山西省农业科学院农业科技创新研究课题(YCX2018D2BH4);国家梨产业技术体系(CARS-28-02A);山西省重点研发计划(201903D211001-12)

Preliminary research on wing dimorphism of pear psylla (Cacopsylla chinensis) and its influence factor

ZHAO Longlong¹^,²(), WEI Jie³, XIE Yingping¹, LI Jie⁴

1. School of Life Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
2. Pomology Institute, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030815, Shanxi, China
3. College of Plant Protection, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China
4. College of Horticulture, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, Shanxi, China

Received:2021-01-15 Online:2022-01-25 Published:2022-02-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

对中国梨木虱不同月份和不同光周期下的翅型变化进行研究。结果表明,梨木虱翅型随月份发生明显变化,5—9月为短翅型,10月至次年4月为长翅型。恒温20 ℃条件下,短光周期(9 h光/15 h暗、8 h光/16 h暗)可诱导产生长翅型,而长光周期(12 h光/12 h暗,10 h光/14 h暗)可诱导产生短翅型。短光周期下长翅型梨木虱的体长相对较长,因而其相对翅长反而较小。对不同月份和不同光周期下翅脉交叉地标点的距离变化特征进行分析,发现两者诱导的翅型分化特点一致。由此,基本可确定光周期是影响梨木虱翅型变化的主要因子之一。

关键词: 梨木虱, 翅型分化, 光周期, 长翅型

Abstract:

The wing dimorphism of pear psylla (Cacopsylla chinensis) under different months and different photoperiods were studied in this paper. It was shown that there were two distinctive wing morph which changed with months. The short-wing pear psylla occurred from May to September, while the long-wing pear psylla occurred from October to the next April. Under constant temperature of 20 ℃, short photoperiod conditions (9 h light/15 h dark, 8 h light/16 h dark) induced long-wing pear psylla; while long photoperiod conditions (12 h light/12 h dark, 10 h light/14 h dark) induced short-wing pear psylla. Due to the longer body length of long-wing pear psylla induced under short photoperiod conditions, its relative wing length turned shorter. Based on the analysis of the distance between the wing vein cross landmarks under different months and different photoperiods, which exhibited the same variation characteristics in the wing dimorphism, it was deduced that the photoperiod was a major inducing factor of the pear psylla wing dimorphism.

Key words: pear psylla, wing dimorphism, photoperiod, long-wing morph

中图分类号:

S436

赵龙龙, 卫洁, 谢映平, 李捷. 中国梨木虱翅型变化及其影响因素初探[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(1): 120-127.

ZHAO Longlong, WEI Jie, XIE Yingping, LI Jie. Preliminary research on wing dimorphism of pear psylla (Cacopsylla chinensis) and its influence factor[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(1): 120-127.

图/表 7

参考文献 20

[1]	赵龙龙. 中国梨木虱成灾原因分析及防治建议[J]. 特种经济动植物, 2020, 23(11): 77-79.
	ZHAO L L. Analysis of the causes of Psylla chinensis disaster and suggestions for prevention and control[J]. Special Economic Animals and Plants, 2020, 23(11): 77-79.(in Chinese)
[2]	赵龙龙, 李庆亮, 张未仲, 等. 几种生物农药对梨园两种主要刺吸式害虫的毒力比较[J]. 农学学报, 2018, 8(12): 24-27.
	ZHAO L L, LI Q L, ZHANG W Z, et al. Toxicity comparison of bio-pesticides against two main pear orchard piercing-sucking pests[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2018, 8(12): 24-27. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	刘朝红, 胡增丽, 张未仲, 等. 外源水分和温度对冬型梨木虱存活的影响[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2020, 42(6): 1409-1414.
	LIU Z H, HU Z L, ZHANG W Z, et al. Effects of external water and temperature on survival of winter-form pear Psylla[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2020, 42(6): 1409-1414.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	赵龙龙, 王劲恒, 胡增丽, 等. 基于文献计量学的梨树害虫演替特点分析[J]. 中国果树, 2019(1): 68-72.
	ZHAO L L, WANG J H, HU Z L, et al. Characteristics analysis of pear pests in China based on bibliometric[J]. China Fruits, 2019(1): 68-72.(in Chinese)
[5]	戴华国, 吴小毅, 杨亦桦. 昆虫翅多型现象的控制机理[J]. 华东昆虫学报, 1997, 6(1): 99-103.
	DAI H G, WU X Y, YANG Y H. Regulative mechanism of wing-polymorphism of insect[J]. Entomological Journal of East China, 1997, 6(1): 99-103. (in Chinese)
[6]	俞金婷, 陈小芳, 任应党, 等. 植物病媒昆虫的翅型分化[J]. 昆虫学报, 2020, 63(2): 229-234.
	YU J T, CHEN X F, REN Y D, et al. Wing morph differentiation of plant-pathogen borne vector insects[J]. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 2020, 63(2): 229-234.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	王小艺, 杨忠岐, 魏可, 等. 昆虫翅型分化的表型可塑性机制[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(12): 3988-3999.
	WANG X Y, YANG Z Q, WEI K, et al. Mechanisms of phenotypic plasticity for wing morph differentiation in insects[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(12): 3988-3999.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	朱化平, 杨晓岩, 季兴龙, 等. 环境因子对葡萄根瘤蚜翅型分化的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2015, 47(2): 100-103.
	ZHU H P, YANG X Y, JI X L, et al. Effects of environmental factors on wing polyphenism of Daktulosphaira vitifoliae[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 47(2): 100-103.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	张明, 刘瑞莹, 贺静澜, 等. 近零磁场对褐飞虱翅型分化、趋光性及飞行能力的影响[J]. 昆虫学报, 2019, 62(1): 82-90.
	ZHANG M, LIU R Y, HE J L, et al. Wing-form differentiation, phototaxis and flight performance of the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) under near-zero magnetic fields[J]. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 2019, 62(1): 82-90.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	曾杨, 朱道弘, 赵吕权. 环境因素对长颚斗蟋翅型分化的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(21): 6001-6008.
	ZENG Y, ZHU D H, ZHAO L Q. Effects of environmental factors on wing differentiation in Velarifictorus aspersus Walker[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(21): 6001-6008.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	朱道弘. 小翅稻蝗(Oxya yezoensis Shiraki)翅多型现象浅释[J]. 生态学报, 2001, 21(4): 624-628.
	ZHU D H. The wing polymorphism in rice grasshopper, Oxya yezoensi Shiraki(Orthopera:Catantopidae)[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2001, 21(4): 624-628.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	杨益众, 张建军, 戴志一, 等. 影响禾缢管蚜翅型分化的因子初探[J]. 江苏农业研究, 2000, 21(1): 56-59.
	YANG Y Z, ZHANG J J, DAI Z Y, et al. A preliminary study of ecological conditions on the production of alatae of bird cherry-oat aphid[J]. Jiangsu Agricutural Research, 2000, 21(1): 56-59. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	万两, 盛洪珍, 蔡瑷安, 等. 影响褐飞虱和蚜虫翅型分化的外部因素[J]. 作物研究, 2012, 26(5): 620-622.
	WAN L, SHENG H Z, CAI A A, et al. External factors on wing differentiation of brown planthopper and aphid[J]. Crop Research, 2012, 26(5): 620-622.(in Chinese)
[14]	周崇高, 冯娅琳, 陆潮峰, 等. 稻飞虱翅型分化的研究进展[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2014, 53(17): 3985-3990.
	ZHOU C G, FENG Y L, LU C F, et al. Advances in wing dimorphism of rice planthoppers[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 53(17): 3985-3990.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	杨宗霖, 王艺, 马田田, 等. 有翅和无翅豌豆蚜中翅型分化信号通路相关微小RNA及其靶基因的表达差异[J]. 昆虫学报, 2019, 62(11): 1260-1270.
	YANG Z L, WANG Y, MA T T, et al. Differences in the expression of micro RNAs related to wing-morph differentiation and their target genes in the winged and wingless pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum(Hemiptera: Aphididae)[J]. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 2019, 62(11): 1260-1270.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	刘树生, 吴晓晶. 温度对桃蚜和萝卜蚜翅型分化的影响[J]. 昆虫学报, 1994, 37(3): 292-297.
	LIU S S, WU X J. The influence of temperature on winc dimorphismin Myzus persicae and Lipaphis erysimi[J]. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 1994, 37(3): 292-297. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	余月书, 郑绵婵, 唐莉. 农药及空间大小对桃蚜翅型分化的影响[J]. 上海农业学报, 2016, 32(2): 61-64.
	YU Y S, ZHENG M C, TANG L. Influences of pesticides and space for Myzus persicae on wing dimorphism[J]. Acta Agriculturae Shanghai, 2016, 32(2): 61-64.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	吕楠楠, 石棋, 仵均祥, 等. 无翅型和有翅型麦长管蚜卵巢发育与繁殖适合度的差异[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 47(3): 52-56.
	LÜ N N, SHI Q, WU J X, et al. Fitness differences of ovarian development and reproduction between wingless and winged morphs of Sitobion avenae(Fabricius)(Homoptera: Aphididae)[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 47(3): 52-56.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	赵龙龙, 张未仲, 胡增丽, 等. 山西省太谷县梨木虱发生规律的调查[J]. 落叶果树, 2019, 51(6): 46-48.
	ZHAO L L, ZHANG W Z, HU Z L, et al. Investigation on occurrence regularity of pear psyllid in Taigu County of Shanxi Province[J]. Deciduous Fruits, 2019, 51(6): 46-48.(in Chinese)
[20]	朱道弘. 昆虫翅型分化的调控及翅多型性的进化[J]. 昆虫知识, 2009, 46(1): 11-16.
	ZHU D H. Regulatory mechanism and evolution of insect wing polymorphism[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Entomology, 2009, 46(1): 11-16.(in Chinese with English abstract)

处理	1-2	1-3	1-4	1-5	1-6	1-7	1-8	1-9	1-10	1-11	1-12
Treatment
A	0.47±0.01	0.86±0.01	1.81±0.03	2.12±0.02	0.73±0.02	1.59±0.02	2.12±0.02	1.94±0.02	1.16±0.02	1.69±0.01	1.31±0.01
B	0.48±0.01	0.85±0.01	1.68±0.02	2.07±0.02	0.69±0.01	1.59±0.02	2.14±0.02	1.96±0.02	1.18±0.02	1.73±0.02	1.35±0.03
C	0.48±0.01	0.89±0.01	1.77±0.02	2.13±0.01	0.73±0.01	1.63±0.01	2.16±0.01	1.96±0.01	1.16±0.01	1.70±0.01	1.32±0.01
D	0.46±0.01	0.84±0.01	1.67±0.02	2.01±0.03	0.67±0.01	1.57±0.01	2.03±0.02	1.87±0.02	1.11±0.01	1.63±0.01	1.24±0.01
E	0.49±0.01	0.89±0.02	1.84±0.03	2.20±0.01	0.73±0.01	1.64±0.01	2.21±0.01	1.99±0.01	1.14±0.01	1.75±0.01	1.33±0.01
F^*	0.48±0.01	0.92±0.02	2.01±0.05	2.37±0.05	0.75±0.02	1.76±0.03	2.39±0.05	2.17±0.05	1.25±0.03	1.90±0.02	1.40±0.03
I	0.48±0.01	0.87±0.02	1.58±0.05	1.99±0.06	0.73±0.04	1.56±0.01	2.04±0.06	1.86±0.05	1.13±0.02	1.64±0.04	1.28±0.03
J	0.48±0.01	0.85±0.02	1.71±0.03	1.99±0.03	0.73±0.01	1.54±0.03	2.01±0.03	1.82±0.03	1.11±0.02	1.61±0.03	1.28±0.02
K	0.55±0.02	0.97±0.03	2.05±0.04	2.48±0.04	0.80±0.03	1.83±0.03	2.49±0.04	2.25±0.03	1.32±0.03	1.91±0.04	1.48±0.04
L	0.51±0.02	0.93±0.02	1.91±0.05	2.31±0.06	0.76±0.02	1.73±0.04	2.33±0.06	2.12±0.05	1.26±0.03	1.86±0.04	1.41±0.03

处理	1-2	1-3	1-4	1-5	1-6	1-7	1-8	1-9	1-10	1-11	1-12
Treatment
A	0.47±0.01	0.86±0.01	1.81±0.03	2.12±0.02	0.73±0.02	1.59±0.02	2.12±0.02	1.94±0.02	1.16±0.02	1.69±0.01	1.31±0.01
B	0.48±0.01	0.85±0.01	1.68±0.02	2.07±0.02	0.69±0.01	1.59±0.02	2.14±0.02	1.96±0.02	1.18±0.02	1.73±0.02	1.35±0.03
C	0.48±0.01	0.89±0.01	1.77±0.02	2.13±0.01	0.73±0.01	1.63±0.01	2.16±0.01	1.96±0.01	1.16±0.01	1.70±0.01	1.32±0.01
D	0.46±0.01	0.84±0.01	1.67±0.02	2.01±0.03	0.67±0.01	1.57±0.01	2.03±0.02	1.87±0.02	1.11±0.01	1.63±0.01	1.24±0.01
E	0.49±0.01	0.89±0.02	1.84±0.03	2.20±0.01	0.73±0.01	1.64±0.01	2.21±0.01	1.99±0.01	1.14±0.01	1.75±0.01	1.33±0.01
F^*	0.48±0.01	0.92±0.02	2.01±0.05	2.37±0.05	0.75±0.02	1.76±0.03	2.39±0.05	2.17±0.05	1.25±0.03	1.90±0.02	1.40±0.03
I	0.48±0.01	0.87±0.02	1.58±0.05	1.99±0.06	0.73±0.04	1.56±0.01	2.04±0.06	1.86±0.05	1.13±0.02	1.64±0.04	1.28±0.03
J	0.48±0.01	0.85±0.02	1.71±0.03	1.99±0.03	0.73±0.01	1.54±0.03	2.01±0.03	1.82±0.03	1.11±0.02	1.61±0.03	1.28±0.02
K	0.55±0.02	0.97±0.03	2.05±0.04	2.48±0.04	0.80±0.03	1.83±0.03	2.49±0.04	2.25±0.03	1.32±0.03	1.91±0.04	1.48±0.04
L	0.51±0.02	0.93±0.02	1.91±0.05	2.31±0.06	0.76±0.02	1.73±0.04	2.33±0.06	2.12±0.05	1.26±0.03	1.86±0.04	1.41±0.03

处理	1-2	1-3	1-4	1-5	1-6	1-7	1-8	1-9	1-10	1-11	1-12
Treatment
A	0.46±0.01	0.82±0.01	1.61±0.02	1.96±0.02	0.67±0.01	1.49±0.01	1.99±0.01	1.79±0.01	1.08±0.01	1.56±0.01	1.22±0.01
B	0.46±0.01	0.80±0.01	1.56±0.02	1.88±0.02	0.66±0.01	1.47±0.01	1.90±0.02	1.73±0.02	1.05±0.01	1.52±0.02	1.19±0.02
C	0.45±0.01	0.81±0.01	1.68±0.03	1.93±0.03	0.66±0.01	1.46±0.04	1.95±0.03	1.78±0.02	1.09±0.02	1.55±0.02	1.20±0.02
D	0.47±0.01	0.81±0.01	1.57±0.02	1.90±0.02	0.66±0.02	1.46±0.01	1.92±0.02	1.75±0.01	1.05±0.01	1.54±0.01	1.19±0.01
E	0.45±0.01	0.80±0.01	1.56±0.01	1.81±0.01	0.65±0.01	1.41±0.01	1.82±0.01	1.67±0.01	1.02±0.01	1.46±0.01	1.13±0.01
F^*	0.56±0.01	0.98±0.01	1.99±0.03	2.39±0.03	0.80±0.02	1.80±0.02	2.39±0.03	2.17±0.03	1.27±0.02	1.89±0.02	1.42±0.02
I	0.47±0.01	0.88±0.01	1.60±0.01	2.04±0.01	0.71±0.01	1.58±0.01	2.10±0.01	1.91±0.01	1.15±0.01	1.68±0.01	1.30±0.01
J	0.45±0.01	0.81±0.03	1.62±0.03	2.01±0.03	0.69±0.01	1.51±0.02	2.03±0.03	1.82±0.02	1.09±0.02	1.56±0.03	1.21±0.03
K	0.55±0.01	0.95±0.01	1.93±0.02	2.35±0.02	0.78±0.01	1.78±0.01	2.37±0.01	2.14±0.01	1.27±0.01	1.87±0.01	1.40±0.01
L	0.49±0.02	0.86±0.04	1.77±0.08	2.13±0.09	0.71±0.02	1.60±0.06	2.15±0.09	1.97±0.07	1.18±0.05	1.73±0.06	1.30±0.05

处理	1-2	1-3	1-4	1-5	1-6	1-7	1-8	1-9	1-10	1-11	1-12
Treatment
A	0.46±0.01	0.82±0.01	1.61±0.02	1.96±0.02	0.67±0.01	1.49±0.01	1.99±0.01	1.79±0.01	1.08±0.01	1.56±0.01	1.22±0.01
B	0.46±0.01	0.80±0.01	1.56±0.02	1.88±0.02	0.66±0.01	1.47±0.01	1.90±0.02	1.73±0.02	1.05±0.01	1.52±0.02	1.19±0.02
C	0.45±0.01	0.81±0.01	1.68±0.03	1.93±0.03	0.66±0.01	1.46±0.04	1.95±0.03	1.78±0.02	1.09±0.02	1.55±0.02	1.20±0.02
D	0.47±0.01	0.81±0.01	1.57±0.02	1.90±0.02	0.66±0.02	1.46±0.01	1.92±0.02	1.75±0.01	1.05±0.01	1.54±0.01	1.19±0.01
E	0.45±0.01	0.80±0.01	1.56±0.01	1.81±0.01	0.65±0.01	1.41±0.01	1.82±0.01	1.67±0.01	1.02±0.01	1.46±0.01	1.13±0.01
F^*	0.56±0.01	0.98±0.01	1.99±0.03	2.39±0.03	0.80±0.02	1.80±0.02	2.39±0.03	2.17±0.03	1.27±0.02	1.89±0.02	1.42±0.02
I	0.47±0.01	0.88±0.01	1.60±0.01	2.04±0.01	0.71±0.01	1.58±0.01	2.10±0.01	1.91±0.01	1.15±0.01	1.68±0.01	1.30±0.01
J	0.45±0.01	0.81±0.03	1.62±0.03	2.01±0.03	0.69±0.01	1.51±0.02	2.03±0.03	1.82±0.02	1.09±0.02	1.56±0.03	1.21±0.03
K	0.55±0.01	0.95±0.01	1.93±0.02	2.35±0.02	0.78±0.01	1.78±0.01	2.37±0.01	2.14±0.01	1.27±0.01	1.87±0.01	1.40±0.01
L	0.49±0.02	0.86±0.04	1.77±0.08	2.13±0.09	0.71±0.02	1.60±0.06	2.15±0.09	1.97±0.07	1.18±0.05	1.73±0.06	1.30±0.05

中国梨木虱翅型变化及其影响因素初探

Preliminary research on wing dimorphism of pear psylla (Cacopsylla chinensis) and its influence factor

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 20

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	袁玺垒, 王振山, 贾小平, 桑璐曼, 李剑峰, 张博. 光周期调控植物开花分子机制以及CCT基因家族研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(6): 1133-1140.
[2]	杜军利, 武德功, 詹秋文, 黄保宏, 倪鹤. 不同光周期对高粱叶片和蚜虫体内营养物质含量和相关酶活性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(7): 1119-1127.
[3]	杜军利, 藏绮罗, 武德功, 余海兵, 詹秋文, 黄保宏. 光周期对玉米蚜生长发育及种群参数的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(9): 1534-1540.
[4]	王立如;徐永江;徐绍清;陈庭华. 中国梨木虱在梨树上的序贯抽样技术研究[J]. , 2004, 16(6): 0-367.