基于绿色发展理念的浙江“26县”政策对城乡收入差距的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.01.25

浙江农业学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 238-248.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.01.25

• 农业经济与发展 • 上一篇

基于绿色发展理念的浙江“26县”政策对城乡收入差距的影响

李宝值(), 卓妮, 黄河啸, 朱奇彪()

浙江省农业科学院农村发展研究所,浙江杭州 310021

收稿日期:2022-04-06 出版日期:2023-01-25 发布日期:2023-02-21
通讯作者: *朱奇彪,E-mail:1090506033@qq.com
作者简介:李宝值(1987—),男,黑龙江佳木斯人,博士,副研究员,主要从事农村人力资本与农民收入研究。E-mail:lbzjms@126.com

Impact of “26 counties” policy based on concept of green development on urban-rural income gap in Zhejiang Province, China

LI Baozhi(), ZHUO Ni, HUANG Hexiao, ZHU Qibiao()

Institute of Rural Development, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China

Received:2022-04-06 Online:2023-01-25 Published:2023-02-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探求缩小城乡收入差距的新动能与新路径,本文关注并分析了基于绿色发展理念的浙江“26县”政策,介绍了“26县”政策出台的现实背景,总结了“26县”政策的主要内容,阐述了“26县”政策影响城乡收入差距的作用机理,并利用2013—2019年浙江省83个县级行政区的面板数据,通过双重差分模型实证检验了“26县”政策对城乡收入差距的影响效果。研究发现:“26县”政策显著缩小了城乡收入差距;同时,“26县”政策显著缩小了经营净收入和转移净收入的城乡差距,但在缩小工资性收入和财产净收入城乡差距上的作用不显著。上述发现既可为迈向共同富裕的绿色发展之路提供现实依据,也可为激发乡村生态要素优势的政策制定提供有益参考。

关键词: 城乡收入差距, “26县”政策, 绿色发展理念

Abstract:

In order to explore the new driving forces and new paths to narrow the urban-rural income gap, the case of “26 counties” policy based on the ideas of green development in Zhejiang Province, China, was focused and analyzed in the present assay. The realistic background of the “26 counties” policy was introduced, the main contents of the “26 counties” policy were summarized, and the mechanism of the “26 counties” policy affecting the urban-rural income gap was expounded. By using the panel data of 83 county-level administrative regions in Zhejiang Province from 2013 to 2019, the impact of the “26 counties” policy on the urban-rural income gap was examined through the difference-in-difference model. The results showed that the “26 counties” policy significantly reduced the urban-rural income gap. To be more specific, the “26 county” policy could significantly narrow the urban-rural gap of net operation income and net transferred income, but the effect on narrowing the urban-rural gap of wage income and net property income was not significant. These findings not only provided practical basis for the green development towards common prosperity, but also provided useful references for policy-formulation to stimulate the advantages of rural ecological elements.

Key words: urban-rural income gap, “26 counties” policy, ideas of green development

中图分类号:

S-9
F323

李宝值, 卓妮, 黄河啸, 朱奇彪. 基于绿色发展理念的浙江“26县”政策对城乡收入差距的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(1): 238-248.

LI Baozhi, ZHUO Ni, HUANG Hexiao, ZHU Qibiao. Impact of “26 counties” policy based on concept of green development on urban-rural income gap in Zhejiang Province, China[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(1): 238-248.

图/表 6

图1 “26县”政策缩小城乡收入差距的逻辑框架

Fig.1 Logical framework of “26 counties” policy to narrow income gap between urban and rural areas

表1 变量描述性统计结果

Table 1 Descriptive statistics of variables

变量 Variable	平均值 Mean	标准差 Standard deviation	最小值 Minimum	最大值 Maximum
g	2.063	0.201	1.478	2.469
g₁	1.946	0.494	1.128	4.673
g₂	1.253	0.512	0.871	2.985
g₃	9.333	7.767	1.034	28.082
g₄	2.811	1.392	0.763	8.384
A	0.313	0.464	0.000	1.000
P	0.714	0.452	0.000	1.000
d	0.224	0.417	0.000	1.000
X₁	8.124	3.649	1.490	21.124
$X 12$	79.287	75.356	2.220	446.219
X₂	64.929	6.498	47.700	78.500
X₃	1.605	1.467	0.362	15.702
X₄	1.503	2.362	0	16.091
X₅	0.167	0.109	0.027	0.689
X₆	0.062	0.043	0.009	0.268

表1 变量描述性统计结果

Table 1 Descriptive statistics of variables

变量 Variable	平均值 Mean	标准差 Standard deviation	最小值 Minimum	最大值 Maximum
g	2.063	0.201	1.478	2.469
g₁	1.946	0.494	1.128	4.673
g₂	1.253	0.512	0.871	2.985
g₃	9.333	7.767	1.034	28.082
g₄	2.811	1.392	0.763	8.384
A	0.313	0.464	0.000	1.000
P	0.714	0.452	0.000	1.000
d	0.224	0.417	0.000	1.000
X₁	8.124	3.649	1.490	21.124
$X 12$	79.287	75.356	2.220	446.219
X₂	64.929	6.498	47.700	78.500
X₃	1.605	1.467	0.362	15.702
X₄	1.503	2.362	0	16.091
X₅	0.167	0.109	0.027	0.689
X₆	0.062	0.043	0.009	0.268

表2 “26县”政策对城乡收入差距影响的估计结果

Table 2 Estimation results of impact of “26 counties” policy on urban-rural income gap

变量 Variable	模型1 Model 1	模型2 Model 2	模型3 Model 3	模型4 Model 4
d	-0.018^*** (0.005)	-0.017^*** (0.005)	-0.015^*** (0.006)	-0.013^** (0.005)
X₁	—	0.075 (0.087)	0.328 (0.247)	0.527^** (0.213)
$X 12$	—	—	-0.376 (0.279)	-0.378^* (0.204)
X₂	—	—	—	0.003^** (0.001)
X₃	—	—	—	-0.012^* (0.006)
X₄	—	—	—	0.003^*** (0.001)
X₅	—	—	—	-0.014^* (0.008)
X₆	—	—	—	0.702^** (0.272)
常数项 Constant	1.949^*** (0.002)	1.943^*** (0.007)	1.928^*** (0.016)	1.695^*** (0.101)
R²	0.757	0.758	0.760	0.792

表2 “26县”政策对城乡收入差距影响的估计结果

Table 2 Estimation results of impact of “26 counties” policy on urban-rural income gap

变量 Variable	模型1 Model 1	模型2 Model 2	模型3 Model 3	模型4 Model 4
d	-0.018^*** (0.005)	-0.017^*** (0.005)	-0.015^*** (0.006)	-0.013^** (0.005)
X₁	—	0.075 (0.087)	0.328 (0.247)	0.527^** (0.213)
$X 12$	—	—	-0.376 (0.279)	-0.378^* (0.204)
X₂	—	—	—	0.003^** (0.001)
X₃	—	—	—	-0.012^* (0.006)
X₄	—	—	—	0.003^*** (0.001)
X₅	—	—	—	-0.014^* (0.008)
X₆	—	—	—	0.702^** (0.272)
常数项 Constant	1.949^*** (0.002)	1.943^*** (0.007)	1.928^*** (0.016)	1.695^*** (0.101)
R²	0.757	0.758	0.760	0.792

图2 平行趋势检验结果

Fig.2 Results of parallel trend test

图3 安慰剂检验结果

Fig.3 Results of placebo test

表3 “26县”政策对不同类型收入城乡差距影响的估计结果

Table 3 Estimation results of impact of “26 counties” policy on various types of urban-rural income gap

变量Variable	g₁	g₂	g₃	g₄
d	-0.079 (0.052)	-0.083^** (0.038)	-0.0491 (0.082)	-0.027^* (0.016)
常数项 Constant	1.085 (0.874)	0.931^* (0.473)	0.041 (0.073)	0.395^** (0.166)
R²	0.302	0.128	0.153	0.221

参考文献 35

[1]	罗知, 万广华, 张勋, 等. 兼顾效率与公平的城镇化: 理论模型与中国实证[J]. 经济研究, 2018, 53(7): 89-105.
	LUO Z, WAN G H, ZHANG X, et al. Urbanization with equity considerations: theory and evidence from China[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2018, 53(7): 89-105. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	陈斌开, 张鹏飞, 杨汝岱. 政府教育投入、人力资本投资与中国城乡收入差距[J]. 管理世界, 2010(1): 36-43.
	CHEN B K, ZHANG P F, YANG R D. Government investment in education, human capital investment and China’s urban-rural income gap[J]. Management World, 2010(1): 36-43. (in Chinese)
[3]	马红旗, 黄桂田, 王韧. 物质资本的积累对我国城乡收入差距的影响: 基于资本-技能互补视角[J]. 管理世界, 2017(4): 32-46.
	MA H Q, HUANG G T, WANG R. The impact of material capital accumulation on urban-rural income gap in China: from the perspective of capital skill complementarity[J]. Management World, 2017(4): 32-46. (in Chinese)
[4]	程名望, 张家平. 互联网普及与城乡收入差距: 理论与实证[J]. 中国农村经济, 2019(2): 19-41.
	CHENG M W, ZHANG J P. Internet popularization and urban-rural income gap: a theoretical and empirical analysis[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2019(2): 19-41. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	ACEMOGLU D, ROBINSON J A. Why did the west extend the franchise? :democracy, inequality, and growth in historical perspective[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2000, 115(4): 1167-1199. DOI URL
[6]	李永友, 王超. 集权式财政改革能够缩小城乡差距吗?: 基于“乡财县管”准自然实验的证据[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(4): 113-130.
	LI Y Y, WANG C. Can centralized fiscal reform narrow the gap between urban and rural areas?: evidences based on natural experiments of village-finance-supervised-by-county reform[J]. Management World, 2020, 36(4): 113-130. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	林毅夫, 陈斌开. 发展战略、产业结构与收入分配[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2013, 12(4): 1109-1140.
	LIN Y F, CHEN B K. Development strategy, industrial structure and income distribution[J]. China Economic Quarterly, 2013, 12(4): 1109-1140. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	万海远, 李实. 户籍歧视对城乡收入差距的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2013, 48(9): 43-55.
	WAN H Y, LI S. The effects of household registration system discrimination on urban-rural income inequality in China[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2013, 48(9): 43-55. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	石敏俊. 中国经济绿色发展:理念、路径与政策[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2021: 18-19.
[10]	向国成, 邝劲松, 邝嫦娥. 绿色发展促进共同富裕的内在机理与实现路径[J]. 郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 51(6): 71-76.
	XIANG G C, KUANG J S, KUANG C E. Internal mechanism and realization path of green development promoting common prosperity[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 51(6): 71-76. (in Chinese)
[11]	马青, 傅强, 王庆宇. 产业绿色转型能缓解城乡收入不平等吗?: 基于政府规制的耦合互动分析[J]. 经济问题探索, 2019(11): 94-111.
	MA Q, FU Q, WANG Q Y. Can green industrial transformation alleviate income inequality between urban and rural areas?: coupled interaction analysis based on government regulations[J]. Inquiry into Economic Issues, 2019(11): 94-111. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	杨宏山. 公共政策学[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2020.
[13]	约翰·W·金登. 议程、备选方案与公共政策[M]. 丁煌, 方兴, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2004.
[14]	叶慧. 引领新常态实现新跨越: 浙江省推进26县加快发展纪实[J]. 今日浙江, 2015(5): 12-15.
	YE H. Leading the new normal and realizing a new leap: a documentary on accelerating the development of 26 counties in Zhejiang Province[J]. Zhejiang Today, 2015(5): 12-15. (in Chinese)
[15]	韩汉君. 收入分配: 一个从生产要素层面的分析框架[J]. 学术月刊, 2005, 37(9): 43-49.
	HAN H J. Income distribution: an analytical framework on the stratum of productive factors[J]. Academic Monthly, 2005, 37(9): 43-49. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	樊纲. “发展悖论”与发展经济学的“特征性问题”[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(4): 34-39.
	FAN G. The development paradox and the characteristic problems of development economics[J]. Management World, 2020, 36(4): 34-39. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	金成武. 中国城乡融合发展与理论融合: 兼谈当代发展经济学理论的批判借鉴[J]. 经济研究, 2019, 54(8): 183-197.
	JIN C W. A critical reference to contemporary theories of development economics: a theoretical synthesis based on Chinese urban-rural integrated development[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2019, 54(8): 183-197. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	MOLNAR K, SCHERR S J, KHARE A. Who conserves the world’s forests?[EB/OL]. [2022-04-06]. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Augusta-Molnar-2/publication/255657467_Who_Conserves_the_World’s_Forests/links/587d012308ae9275d4e7342e/Who-Conserves-the-Worlds-Forests.pdf
[19]	SINARE H, GORDON L J, ENFORS KAUTSKY E. Assessment of ecosystem services and benefits in village landscapes: a case study from Burkina Faso[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2016, 21: 141-152. DOI URL
[20]	崔莉, 厉新建, 程哲. 自然资源资本化实现机制研究: 以南平市“生态银行”为例[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(9): 95-100.
	CUI L, LI X J, CHENG Z. The realization mechanism of natural resources capitalization: a case study of Nanping City “ecological bank”[J]. Management World, 2019, 35(9): 95-100. (in Chinese)
[21]	黄祖辉. “绿水青山”转换为“金山银山”的机制和路径[J]. 浙江经济, 2017(8): 11-12.
	HUANG Z H. The mechanism and path of transforming “green water and green mountain” into “golden mountain and silver mountain”[J]. Zhejiang Economy, 2017(8): 11-12. (in Chinese)
[22]	石敏俊. 生态产品价值的实现路径与机制设计[J]. 环境经济研究, 2021, 6(2): 1-6.
	SHI M J. Path and mechanism for realizing value of the ecological products[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics, 2021, 6(2): 1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	KRONENBERG J, HUBACEK K. From poverty trap to ecosystem service curse[J]. Sustainability Science, 2016, 11(6): 903-907. DOI PMID
[24]	COSTANZA R. Valuing natural capital and ecosystem services toward the goals of efficiency, fairness, and sustainability[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2020, 43: 101096. DOI URL
[25]	ANDREW G, MASOZERA M. Payment for ecosystem services and poverty reduction in Rwanda[J]. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 2010, 12(3): 122-139.
[26]	COSTANZA R, DE GROOT R, BRAAT L, et al. Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go?[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 28: 1-16. DOI URL
[27]	朱永官, 李宝值, 吝涛. 培育健康土壤,助力乡村振兴[J]. 科技导报, 2021, 39(23): 54-58.
	ZHU Y G, LI B Z, LIN T. Fostering healthy soil to push forward rural revitalization[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2021, 39(23): 54-58. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	STERNER T, ROBINSON E J Z. Selection and design of environmental policy instruments[J]. Handbook of Environmental Economics, 2018, 4: 231-284.
[29]	SHAPIRO-GARZA E, MCELWEE P, VAN HECKEN G, et al. Beyond market logics: payments for ecosystem services as alternative development practices in the global south[J]. Development and Change, 2020, 51(1): 3-25. DOI URL
[30]	YU H J, XIE W, YANG L, et al. From payments for ecosystem services to eco-compensation: conceptual change or paradigm shift?[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 700: 134627. DOI URL
[31]	DISWANDI D. A hybrid Coasean and Pigouvian approach to Payment for Ecosystem Services Program in West Lombok: does it contribute to poverty alleviation?[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 23: 138-145. DOI URL
[32]	PIRARD R, LAPEYRE R. Classifying market-based instruments for ecosystem services: a guide to the literature jungle[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2014, 9: 106-114. DOI URL
[33]	王芳, 曹一鸣, 陈硕. 反思环境库兹涅茨曲线假说[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2019, 19(1): 81-100.
	WANG F, CAO Y M, CHEN S. Re-thinking environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in China[J]. China Economic Quarterly, 2020, 19(1): 81-100. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34]	李成友, 孙涛, 王硕. 人口结构红利、财政支出偏向与中国城乡收入差距[J]. 经济学动态, 2021(1): 105-124.
	LI C Y, SUN T, WANG S. Dividend from demographic structure, fiscal expenditure bias and urban-rural income gap in China[J]. Economic Perspectives, 2021(1): 105-124. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35]	谢莉娟, 万长松, 武子歆. 流通业发展对城乡收入差距的影响: 基于公有制经济调节效应的分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2021(6): 111-127.
	XIE L J, WAN C S, WU Z X. The impact of development of the circulation industry on urban-rural income gap: astudy based on the moderating effect of public ownership economy[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2021(6): 111-127. (in Chinese with English abstract)

基于绿色发展理念的浙江“26县”政策对城乡收入差距的影响

Impact of “26 counties” policy based on concept of green development on urban-rural income gap in Zhejiang Province, China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 35

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价