浙江农业学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 226-237.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.01.24
收稿日期:
2021-10-23
出版日期:
2023-01-25
发布日期:
2023-02-21
通讯作者:
*胡学英,E-mail: 1565096326@qq.com
作者简介:
罗海平(1979—),男,四川南充人,博士,研究员,研究方向为粮食安全与生态安全。E-mail: lhp6322@126.com
基金资助:
LUO Haiping1(), PAN Liuxin1, HU Xueying2,*(
), LIU Zuguang1
Received:
2021-10-23
Online:
2023-01-25
Published:
2023-02-21
摘要:
综合运用土地利用转移矩阵、土地利用变化图谱模型、动态修正的生态系统服务价值模型等方法,测度2000—2018年我国粮食主产区耕地利用变化下的粮食产量变动和生态系统服务价值损益,进而探清制约粮食增产和生态服务能力提升的主要耕地利用变化类型,并形成针对性的优化路径。研究发现:我国粮食主产区的耕地面积整体呈现“北增南减”的空间分异特征和“减大于增”的数量变化特征。2000—2018年间,耕地净转出205.98万hm2,建设用地是耕地转出的主要地类。根据耕地利用变化的产出效应,划分4种类型——生态增值-粮食增产型(Ⅰ型)、生态减值-粮食减产型(Ⅱ型)、生态增值-粮食减产型(Ⅲ型)和生态减值-粮食增产型(Ⅳ型),在省级层面上,我国粮食主产区Ⅰ~Ⅳ型面积的占比依次为18.30%、13.36%、33.19%和35.05%,共计造成4.171×1010元的生态系统服务价值损失和9.253×106 t的粮食减产。建设用地占用耕地、未利用地补充耕地分别是最有损、最有益粮食与生态安全的耕地利用变化类型。建议要严控耕地“非农化”“非粮化”,加强对未利用地的生态改良,积极发展林下经济、草原经济等复合型经济农业。
中图分类号:
罗海平, 潘柳欣, 胡学英, 刘祖光. 我国粮食主产区耕地利用变化的粮食与生态效应研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(1): 226-237.
LUO Haiping, PAN Liuxin, HU Xueying, LIU Zuguang. Study on grain and ecological effects of arable land use change in major grain-producing areas in China[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(1): 226-237.
土地利用类型 Land use type | 至2018年,向各土地利用类型的转移面积Area of land use transfer to different land use types till 2018 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
耕地 Arable land | 林地 Woodland | 草地 Grassland | 水域 Water area | 建设用地 Construction land | 未利用地 Unused land | |
耕地Arable land | 8 142.282 | 1 397.719 | 600.339 | 296.347 | 1 113.413 | 152.014 |
林地Woodland | 1 403.550 | 8 335.827 | 858.342 | 87.969 | 119.008 | 316.519 |
草地Grassland | 756.612 | 1 188.757 | 5 449.697 | 87.454 | 111.833 | 788.985 |
水域Water area | 263.298 | 71.009 | 63.327 | 470.259 | 53.214 | 92.976 |
建设用地Construction land | 697.396 | 56.104 | 44.345 | 66.318 | 368.857 | 12.758 |
未利用地Unused land | 232.989 | 91.975 | 521.741 | 58.540 | 26.524 | 2 816.196 |
表1 2000—2018年粮食主产区总的土地利用转移矩阵
Table 1 Land use transfer matrix of major grain-producing areas from 2000 to 2018 104 hm2
土地利用类型 Land use type | 至2018年,向各土地利用类型的转移面积Area of land use transfer to different land use types till 2018 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
耕地 Arable land | 林地 Woodland | 草地 Grassland | 水域 Water area | 建设用地 Construction land | 未利用地 Unused land | |
耕地Arable land | 8 142.282 | 1 397.719 | 600.339 | 296.347 | 1 113.413 | 152.014 |
林地Woodland | 1 403.550 | 8 335.827 | 858.342 | 87.969 | 119.008 | 316.519 |
草地Grassland | 756.612 | 1 188.757 | 5 449.697 | 87.454 | 111.833 | 788.985 |
水域Water area | 263.298 | 71.009 | 63.327 | 470.259 | 53.214 | 92.976 |
建设用地Construction land | 697.396 | 56.104 | 44.345 | 66.318 | 368.857 | 12.758 |
未利用地Unused land | 232.989 | 91.975 | 521.741 | 58.540 | 26.524 | 2 816.196 |
图谱转化类型(编码) Spectrum transformation type (coding) | 图谱单元数 Number of spectrum unit | 面积 Area/ (104 hm2) | 变化比率 Rate of change/% | 空间分离度 Degree of separation |
---|---|---|---|---|
耕地→林地Arable land→Woodland(12) | 139 772 | 1 397.72 | 12.02 | 1.44 |
耕地→草地Arable land→Grassland(13) | 60 034 | 600.34 | 5.16 | 2.20 |
耕地→水域Arable land→Water area(14) | 29 635 | 296.35 | 2.55 | 3.13 |
耕地→建设用地Arable land→Construction land(15) | 111 341 | 1 113.41 | 9.57 | 1.62 |
耕地→未利用地Arable land→Unused land(16) | 15 201 | 152.01 | 1.31 | 4.37 |
林地→耕地Woodland→Arable land(21) | 140 355 | 1 403.55 | 12.07 | 1.44 |
草地→耕地Grassland→Arable land(31) | 75 661 | 756.61 | 6.50 | 1.96 |
水域→耕地Water area→Arable land(41) | 26 330 | 263.30 | 2.26 | 3.32 |
建设用地→耕地Construction land→Arable land(51) | 69 740 | 697.40 | 6.00 | 2.04 |
未利用地→耕地Unused land→Arable land(61) | 23 299 | 232.99 | 2.00 | 3.53 |
总计Total | 691 368 | 6 913.68 | 59.44 | 25.06 |
表2 2000—2018年粮食主产区耕地利用变化的图谱单元特征
Table 2 Characteristics of cultivated land conversion map units in major grain-producing areas from 2000 to 2018
图谱转化类型(编码) Spectrum transformation type (coding) | 图谱单元数 Number of spectrum unit | 面积 Area/ (104 hm2) | 变化比率 Rate of change/% | 空间分离度 Degree of separation |
---|---|---|---|---|
耕地→林地Arable land→Woodland(12) | 139 772 | 1 397.72 | 12.02 | 1.44 |
耕地→草地Arable land→Grassland(13) | 60 034 | 600.34 | 5.16 | 2.20 |
耕地→水域Arable land→Water area(14) | 29 635 | 296.35 | 2.55 | 3.13 |
耕地→建设用地Arable land→Construction land(15) | 111 341 | 1 113.41 | 9.57 | 1.62 |
耕地→未利用地Arable land→Unused land(16) | 15 201 | 152.01 | 1.31 | 4.37 |
林地→耕地Woodland→Arable land(21) | 140 355 | 1 403.55 | 12.07 | 1.44 |
草地→耕地Grassland→Arable land(31) | 75 661 | 756.61 | 6.50 | 1.96 |
水域→耕地Water area→Arable land(41) | 26 330 | 263.30 | 2.26 | 3.32 |
建设用地→耕地Construction land→Arable land(51) | 69 740 | 697.40 | 6.00 | 2.04 |
未利用地→耕地Unused land→Arable land(61) | 23 299 | 232.99 | 2.00 | 3.53 |
总计Total | 691 368 | 6 913.68 | 59.44 | 25.06 |
图1 2000—2018年13个粮食主产省(自治区)的耕地转化类型与面积
Fig.1 Types and areas of arable land conversion in 13 major grain-producing provinces (autonomous region) from 2000 to 2018
图谱转化类型(编码) Spectrum transformation type (coding) | 生态-粮食变化图谱 Ecology-food change spectrum | 面积 Area/ (104 hm2) | 地均ESV变化 ESV change per unit area/(yuan·hm-2) | ESV变化 ESV change/ (1011 yuan) | 粮食产量变化 Change of grain production/(107 t) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
耕地→林地(12) Arable land→Woodland | 生态增值-粮食减产 Ecological appreciation-grain yield reduction | 1 397.719 | 37 837.17 | 5.289 | -6.279 |
耕地→草地(13) Arable land→Grassland | 生态增值-粮食减产 Ecological appreciation-grain yield reduction | 600.339 | 7 054.70 | 0.424 | -2.697 |
耕地→水域(14) Arable land→Water area | 生态增值-粮食减产 Ecological appreciation-grain yield reduction | 296.347 | 70 079.22 | 2.077 | -1.331 |
耕地→建设用地(15) Arable land→Construction land | 生态减值-粮食减产 Ecological impairment-grain yield reduction | 1 113.413 | -14 783.07 | -1.646 | -5.002 |
耕地→未利用地(16) Arable land→Unused land | 生态减值-粮食减产 Ecological impairment-grain yield reduction | 152.014 | -12 182.00 | -0.185 | -0.683 |
林地→耕地(21) Woodland→Arable land | 生态减值-粮食增产 Ecological impairment-grain yield increase | 1 403.550 | -37 837.17 | -5.311 | 6.305 |
草地→耕地(31) Grassland→Arable land | 生态减值-粮食增产 Ecological impairment-grain yield increase | 756.612 | -7 054.70 | -0.534 | 3.399 |
水域→耕地(41) Water area→Arable land | 生态减值-粮食增产 Ecological impairment-grain yield increase | 263.298 | -70 079.22 | -1.845 | 1.183 |
建设用地→耕地(51) Construction land→Arable land | 生态增值-粮食增产 Ecological appreciation-grain yield increase | 697.396 | 14 783.07 | 1.031 | 3.133 |
未利用地→耕地(61) Unused land→Arable land | 生态增值-粮食增产 Ecological appreciation-grain yield increase | 232.989 | 12 182.00 | 0.284 | 1.047 |
总计Total | — | 6 913.677 | -603.15 | -0.417 | -0.925 |
表3 2000—2018年粮食主产区由耕地利用变化导致的生态系统服务价值(ESV)和粮食产量变动情况
Table 3 Changes in ecosystem service values (ESV) and grain yield caused by arable land conversion in major grain-producing areas in 2000-2018
图谱转化类型(编码) Spectrum transformation type (coding) | 生态-粮食变化图谱 Ecology-food change spectrum | 面积 Area/ (104 hm2) | 地均ESV变化 ESV change per unit area/(yuan·hm-2) | ESV变化 ESV change/ (1011 yuan) | 粮食产量变化 Change of grain production/(107 t) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
耕地→林地(12) Arable land→Woodland | 生态增值-粮食减产 Ecological appreciation-grain yield reduction | 1 397.719 | 37 837.17 | 5.289 | -6.279 |
耕地→草地(13) Arable land→Grassland | 生态增值-粮食减产 Ecological appreciation-grain yield reduction | 600.339 | 7 054.70 | 0.424 | -2.697 |
耕地→水域(14) Arable land→Water area | 生态增值-粮食减产 Ecological appreciation-grain yield reduction | 296.347 | 70 079.22 | 2.077 | -1.331 |
耕地→建设用地(15) Arable land→Construction land | 生态减值-粮食减产 Ecological impairment-grain yield reduction | 1 113.413 | -14 783.07 | -1.646 | -5.002 |
耕地→未利用地(16) Arable land→Unused land | 生态减值-粮食减产 Ecological impairment-grain yield reduction | 152.014 | -12 182.00 | -0.185 | -0.683 |
林地→耕地(21) Woodland→Arable land | 生态减值-粮食增产 Ecological impairment-grain yield increase | 1 403.550 | -37 837.17 | -5.311 | 6.305 |
草地→耕地(31) Grassland→Arable land | 生态减值-粮食增产 Ecological impairment-grain yield increase | 756.612 | -7 054.70 | -0.534 | 3.399 |
水域→耕地(41) Water area→Arable land | 生态减值-粮食增产 Ecological impairment-grain yield increase | 263.298 | -70 079.22 | -1.845 | 1.183 |
建设用地→耕地(51) Construction land→Arable land | 生态增值-粮食增产 Ecological appreciation-grain yield increase | 697.396 | 14 783.07 | 1.031 | 3.133 |
未利用地→耕地(61) Unused land→Arable land | 生态增值-粮食增产 Ecological appreciation-grain yield increase | 232.989 | 12 182.00 | 0.284 | 1.047 |
总计Total | — | 6 913.677 | -603.15 | -0.417 | -0.925 |
耕地利用变化效应 Effect of arable land use change | 耕地最主要变化类型 Main types of arable land change | 地级行政单元 Municipal administrative unit |
---|---|---|
生态增值-粮食减产 Ecological appreciation-grain yield reduction | 耕地→林地 Arable land→Woodland | 安庆、池州、黄山、宣城、鹤岗、牡丹江、七台河、伊春、恩施、黄冈、荆门、神农架、十堰、襄阳、宜昌、常德、衡阳、怀化、邵阳、湘西、益阳、永州、长沙、株州、辽源、抚州、九江、萍乡、上饶、宜春、鞍山、本溪、朝阳、丹东、扶顺、阜新、葫芦岛、辽阳、巴中、广安、广元、凉山、泸州、眉山、南充、内江、遂宁、宜宾、资阳 Anqing, Chizhou, Huangshan, Xuancheng, Hegang, Mudanjiang, Qitaihe, Yichun, Enshi, Huanggang, Jingmen, Shennongjia, Shiyan, Xiangyang, Yichang, Changde, Hengyang, Huaihua, Shaoyang, Xiangxi, Yiyang, Yongzhou, Changsha, Zhuzhou, Liaoyuan, Fuzhou, Jiujiang, Pingxiang, Shangrao, Yichun, Anshan, Benxi, Chaoyang, Dandong, Fushun, Fuxin, Huludao, Liaoyang, Bazhong, Guang’an, Guangyuan, Liangshan, Luzhou, Meishan, Nanchong, Neijiang, Suining, Yibin, Ziyang |
耕地→草地 Arable land→Grassland | 承德、济源、鄂尔多斯、呼和浩特、乌海、乌兰察布、锡林郭勒、甘孜 Chengde, Jiyuan, Ordos, Huhhot, Wuhai, Ulanqab, Xilingol, Ganzi | |
耕地→水域 Arable land→Water area | 荆州、仙桃 Jingzhou, Xiantao | |
生态减值-粮食减产 Ecological impairment- grain yield reduction | 耕地→建设用地 Arable land→ Construction land | 蚌埠、亳州、滁州、阜阳、合肥、淮北、淮南、六安、马鞍山、宿州、铜陵、芜湖、保定、沧州、邯郸、衡水、廊坊、秦皇岛、石家庄、唐山、邢台、安阳、鹤壁、焦作、开封、洛阳、漯河、南阳、平顶山、濮阳、商丘、新乡、信阳、许昌、郑州、周口、驻马店、鄂州、潜江、天门、武汉、孝感、四平、松原、长春、常州、淮安、连云港、南京、南通、苏州、宿迁、泰州、无锡、徐州、盐城、扬州、镇江、南昌、锦州、盘锦、沈阳、滨州、德州、东营、菏泽、济南、济宁、聊城、临沂、青岛、日照、泰安、威海、潍坊、枣庄、淄博、成都、德阳 Bengbu, Bozhou, Chuzhou, Fuyang, Hefei, Huaibei, Huainan, Lu’an, Ma’anshan, Suzhou, Tongling, Wuhu, Baoding, Cangzhou, Handan, Hengshui, Langfang, Qinhuangdao, Shijiazhuang, Tangshan, Xingtai, Anyang, Hebi, Jiaozuo, Kaifeng, Luoyang, Luohe, Nanyang, Pingdingshan, Puyang, Shangqiu, Xinxiang, Xinyang, Xuchang, Zhengzhou, Zhoukou, Zhumadian, Ezhou, Qianjiang, Tianmen, Wuhan, Xiaogan, Siping, Songyuan, Changchun, Changzhou, Huai’an, Lianyungang, Nanjing, Nantong, Suzhou, Suqian, Taizhou, Wuxi, Xuzhou, Yancheng, Yangzhou, Zhenjiang, Nanchang, Jinzhou, Panjin, Shenyang, Binzhou, Dezhou, Dongying, Heze, Jinan, Jining, Liaocheng, Linyi, Qingdao, Rizhao, Tai’an, Weihai, Weifang, Zaozhuang, Zibo, Chengdu, Deyang |
生态减值-粮食增产 Ecological impairment- grain yield increase | 林地→耕地 Woodland→Arable land | 大兴安岭、哈尔滨、黑河、鸡西、双鸭山、黄石、随州、咸宁、郴州、娄底、湘潭、岳阳、张家界、白山、吉林、通化、延边、赣州、吉安、景德镇、新余、鹰潭、大连、铁岭、营口、阿坝、达川、乐山、绵阳、攀枝花、雅安、自贡 Da Hinggan Ling, Harbin, Heihe, Jixi, Shuangyashan, Huangshi, Suizhou, Xianning, Chenzhou, Loudi, Xiangtan, Yueyang, Zhangjiajie, Baishan, Jilin, Tonghua, Yanbian, Ganzhou, Ji’an, Jingdezhen, Xinyu, Yingtan, Dalian, Tieling, Yingkou, Aba, Dazhou, Leshan, Mianyang, Panzhihua, Ya’an, Zigong |
草地→耕地 Grassland→Arable land | 张家口、三门峡、大庆、齐齐哈尔、巴彦淖尔、包头、赤峰、呼伦贝尔、通辽、兴安、烟台 Zhangjiakou, Sanmenxia, Daqing, Qiqihar, Bayan Nur, Baotou, Chifeng, Hulun Buir, Tongliao, Xing’an, Yantai | |
生态增值-粮食增产 Ecological appreciation- grain yield increase | 未利用地→耕地 Unused land→ Arable land | 佳木斯、绥化、白城、阿拉善 Jiamusi, Suihua, Baicheng, Alxa |
表4 粮食主产区最主要的耕地变化类型和耕地利用变化效应
Table 4 Main types of arable land change and the effect of arable land use change in major grain-producing areas
耕地利用变化效应 Effect of arable land use change | 耕地最主要变化类型 Main types of arable land change | 地级行政单元 Municipal administrative unit |
---|---|---|
生态增值-粮食减产 Ecological appreciation-grain yield reduction | 耕地→林地 Arable land→Woodland | 安庆、池州、黄山、宣城、鹤岗、牡丹江、七台河、伊春、恩施、黄冈、荆门、神农架、十堰、襄阳、宜昌、常德、衡阳、怀化、邵阳、湘西、益阳、永州、长沙、株州、辽源、抚州、九江、萍乡、上饶、宜春、鞍山、本溪、朝阳、丹东、扶顺、阜新、葫芦岛、辽阳、巴中、广安、广元、凉山、泸州、眉山、南充、内江、遂宁、宜宾、资阳 Anqing, Chizhou, Huangshan, Xuancheng, Hegang, Mudanjiang, Qitaihe, Yichun, Enshi, Huanggang, Jingmen, Shennongjia, Shiyan, Xiangyang, Yichang, Changde, Hengyang, Huaihua, Shaoyang, Xiangxi, Yiyang, Yongzhou, Changsha, Zhuzhou, Liaoyuan, Fuzhou, Jiujiang, Pingxiang, Shangrao, Yichun, Anshan, Benxi, Chaoyang, Dandong, Fushun, Fuxin, Huludao, Liaoyang, Bazhong, Guang’an, Guangyuan, Liangshan, Luzhou, Meishan, Nanchong, Neijiang, Suining, Yibin, Ziyang |
耕地→草地 Arable land→Grassland | 承德、济源、鄂尔多斯、呼和浩特、乌海、乌兰察布、锡林郭勒、甘孜 Chengde, Jiyuan, Ordos, Huhhot, Wuhai, Ulanqab, Xilingol, Ganzi | |
耕地→水域 Arable land→Water area | 荆州、仙桃 Jingzhou, Xiantao | |
生态减值-粮食减产 Ecological impairment- grain yield reduction | 耕地→建设用地 Arable land→ Construction land | 蚌埠、亳州、滁州、阜阳、合肥、淮北、淮南、六安、马鞍山、宿州、铜陵、芜湖、保定、沧州、邯郸、衡水、廊坊、秦皇岛、石家庄、唐山、邢台、安阳、鹤壁、焦作、开封、洛阳、漯河、南阳、平顶山、濮阳、商丘、新乡、信阳、许昌、郑州、周口、驻马店、鄂州、潜江、天门、武汉、孝感、四平、松原、长春、常州、淮安、连云港、南京、南通、苏州、宿迁、泰州、无锡、徐州、盐城、扬州、镇江、南昌、锦州、盘锦、沈阳、滨州、德州、东营、菏泽、济南、济宁、聊城、临沂、青岛、日照、泰安、威海、潍坊、枣庄、淄博、成都、德阳 Bengbu, Bozhou, Chuzhou, Fuyang, Hefei, Huaibei, Huainan, Lu’an, Ma’anshan, Suzhou, Tongling, Wuhu, Baoding, Cangzhou, Handan, Hengshui, Langfang, Qinhuangdao, Shijiazhuang, Tangshan, Xingtai, Anyang, Hebi, Jiaozuo, Kaifeng, Luoyang, Luohe, Nanyang, Pingdingshan, Puyang, Shangqiu, Xinxiang, Xinyang, Xuchang, Zhengzhou, Zhoukou, Zhumadian, Ezhou, Qianjiang, Tianmen, Wuhan, Xiaogan, Siping, Songyuan, Changchun, Changzhou, Huai’an, Lianyungang, Nanjing, Nantong, Suzhou, Suqian, Taizhou, Wuxi, Xuzhou, Yancheng, Yangzhou, Zhenjiang, Nanchang, Jinzhou, Panjin, Shenyang, Binzhou, Dezhou, Dongying, Heze, Jinan, Jining, Liaocheng, Linyi, Qingdao, Rizhao, Tai’an, Weihai, Weifang, Zaozhuang, Zibo, Chengdu, Deyang |
生态减值-粮食增产 Ecological impairment- grain yield increase | 林地→耕地 Woodland→Arable land | 大兴安岭、哈尔滨、黑河、鸡西、双鸭山、黄石、随州、咸宁、郴州、娄底、湘潭、岳阳、张家界、白山、吉林、通化、延边、赣州、吉安、景德镇、新余、鹰潭、大连、铁岭、营口、阿坝、达川、乐山、绵阳、攀枝花、雅安、自贡 Da Hinggan Ling, Harbin, Heihe, Jixi, Shuangyashan, Huangshi, Suizhou, Xianning, Chenzhou, Loudi, Xiangtan, Yueyang, Zhangjiajie, Baishan, Jilin, Tonghua, Yanbian, Ganzhou, Ji’an, Jingdezhen, Xinyu, Yingtan, Dalian, Tieling, Yingkou, Aba, Dazhou, Leshan, Mianyang, Panzhihua, Ya’an, Zigong |
草地→耕地 Grassland→Arable land | 张家口、三门峡、大庆、齐齐哈尔、巴彦淖尔、包头、赤峰、呼伦贝尔、通辽、兴安、烟台 Zhangjiakou, Sanmenxia, Daqing, Qiqihar, Bayan Nur, Baotou, Chifeng, Hulun Buir, Tongliao, Xing’an, Yantai | |
生态增值-粮食增产 Ecological appreciation- grain yield increase | 未利用地→耕地 Unused land→ Arable land | 佳木斯、绥化、白城、阿拉善 Jiamusi, Suihua, Baicheng, Alxa |
[1] | 王钢, 钱龙. 新中国成立70年来的粮食安全战略:演变路径和内在逻辑[J]. 中国农村经济, 2019(9): 15-29. |
WANG G, QIAN L. Grain security strategy in the 70 years since the founding of new China: evolution path and internal logic[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2019(9): 15-29. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 中华人民共和国国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和2035年远景目标纲要[N]. 人民日报, 2021-03-13( 1). |
[3] |
丁振民, 姚顺波. 陕西省耕地转移对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 资源科学, 2019, 41(6): 1070-1081.
DOI |
DING Z M, YAO S B. Effects of cultivated land transition on ecosystem service value in Shaanxi Province of China[J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(6): 1070-1081. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
|
[4] |
宋小青. 论土地利用转型的研究框架[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(3): 471-487.
DOI |
SONG X Q. Discussion on land use transition research framework[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(3): 471-487. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
|
[5] | 肖宝玉. 中国LUCC研究特征与趋势: 基于CiteSpace的分析[J]. 亚热带资源与环境学报, 2020, 15(1): 61-70. |
XIAO B Y. Characteristics and prospects of LUCC research in China: an analysis based on CiteSpace[J]. Journal of Subtropical Resources and Environment, 2020, 15(1): 61-70. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 罗海平, 潘柳欣, 胡学英, 等. 我国粮食主产区粮食安全保障的生态代价评估: 2000—2018年[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2022, 36(1): 1-7. |
LUO H P, PAN L X, HU X Y, et al. Assessment of ecological cost of food security in major grain producing areas in China: 2000-2018[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2022, 36(1): 1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 刘慕华, 肖国安. 土地生态视角下中国粮食综合生产可持续能力研究[J]. 科学决策, 2019(10): 22-53. |
LIU M H, XIAO G A. China’s overall grain production sustainability: in perspective of land ecosystem[J]. Scientific Decision Making, 2019(10): 22-53. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 江松颖, 刘颖, 金雅. 我国粮食综合生产能力影响因素及其变迁分析[J]. 统计与决策, 2016(14): 118-121. |
JIANG S Y, LIU Y, JIN Y. Analysis on the influencing factors and changes of China’s comprehensive grain production capacity[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2016(14): 118-121. (in Chinese) | |
[9] | 阴柯欣, 商庆凯, 米文宝. 宁夏耕地生产力与粮食安全耦合关系及趋势预测[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2020, 34(7): 37-45. |
YIN K X, SHANG Q K, MI W B. Analysis and forecast of coupling relationship between cultivated land productivity and food security in Ningxia[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2020, 34(7): 37-45. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 杨文杰, 刘丹, 巩前文. 2001—2016年耕地非农化过程中农业生态服务价值损失估算及其省域差异[J]. 经济地理, 2019, 39(3): 201-209. |
YANG W J, LIU D, GONG Q W. Estimation loss of agroecosystem service value in farmland conversion and its provincial difference in 2001-2016[J]. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(3): 201-209. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 贺晓英, 李菲, 郭蓓. 农地非农化过程中损失农地的生态价值研究: 以陕西省为例[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(26): 13134-13137. |
HE X Y, LI F, GUO B. Loss of ecological value in farmland during farmland conversion: a case study of Shaanxi Province[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 40(26): 13134-13137. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 娄佩卿, 付波霖, 林星辰, 等. 基于GEE的1998—2018年京津冀土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(12): 5473-5483. |
LOU P Q, FU B L, LIN X C, et al. Influence of land use change on ecosystem service value based on GEE in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region from 1998 to 2018[J]. Environmental Science, 2019, 40(12): 5473-5483. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 李秀霞, 齐露鹭, 牟晓庆. 吉林省农用地生态服务功能价值时空演化研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2018, 39(11): 25-33. |
LI X X, QI L L, MU X Q. A research on the spatial-temporal value evolution of the agricultural land’s ecological service function of Jilin Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2018, 39(11): 25-33. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 邓伟, 周渝, 张勇, 等. 重庆市生态保护红线区生态系统服务价值时空演变特征及其驱动[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2020, 29(1): 79-89. |
DENG W, ZHOU Y, ZHANG Y, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution characteristics of ecosystem service value in Chongqing ecological red line area[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2020, 29(1): 79-89. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 张妮, 周忠学. 城市化进程区农业生态系统正负服务测算: 以长安区为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2018, 41(2): 409-419. |
ZHANG N, ZHOU Z X. Positive and negative agro-ecosystem services evaluation in urbanizing area: a case study of Chang’an District[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2018, 41(2): 409-419. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 王兆峰, 田俊峰. 湖南省耕地资源利用安全综合评价与提升路径研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2021, 35(1): 48-58. |
WANG Z F, TIAN J F. Study on comprehensive evaluation and promotion path of cultivated land resources use security in Hunan Province[J]. China Land Science, 2021, 35(1): 48-58. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 刘利花, 张丙昕, 刘向华. 粮食安全与生态安全双视角下中国省域耕地保护补偿研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(19): 252-263. |
LIU L H, ZHANG B X, LIU X H. Compensation of provincial cultivated land protection in China from the dual perspectives of food security and ecological security[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(19): 252-263. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 吴晓光, 张宏飞, 孙林, 等. 三位一体保护视角下内蒙古耕地质量空间演变研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2020, 34(6): 48-55. |
WU X G, ZHANG H F, SUN L, et al. Spatial evolution of cultivated land quality of Inner Mongolia in the vision of trinity conservation[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2020, 34(6): 48-55. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 张鹏岩, 耿文亮, 杨丹, 等. 黄河下游地区土地利用和生态系统服务价值的时空演变[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(11): 277-288. |
ZHANG P Y, GENG W L, YANG D, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution of land use and ecosystem service value in the Lower Reaches of the Yellow River Region[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(11): 277-288. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 史洋洋, 吕晓, 黄贤金, 等. 江苏沿海地区耕地利用转型及其生态系统服务价值变化响应[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(6): 961-976. |
SHI Y Y, LÜ X, HUANG X J, et al. Arable land use transitions and its response of ecosystem services value change in Jiangsu coastal areas[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017, 32(6): 961-976. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] |
苗苗, 迮寒露, 吴永华. 浙江省耕地利用转型时空演变特征分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(4): 753-760.
DOI |
MIAO M, ZE H L, WU Y H. Spatio-temporal evolution characteristics of cultivated land use transition in Zhejiang Province[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(4): 753-760. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
|
[22] | 谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(5): 911-919. |
XIE G D, ZHEN L, LU C X, et al. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008, 23(5): 911-919. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 全国生态功能区划[N]. 中国环境报,2015-12-01(6). |
[1] | 崔宁波, 生世玉. 粮食安全视角下的东北黑土区耕地生态补偿研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(9): 1759-1769. |
[2] | 罗海平, 何志文, 李卓雅. 基于动态空间杜宾模型的2008—2018年中国粮食全要素生产率增产效应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(11): 2195-2204. |
[3] | 张发明, 丁峰, 王坪. 中国粮食主产区农业高质量发展水平评价与时空演变[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(1): 150-160. |
[4] | 罗海平, 周静逸, 何志文. 基于县域尺度的粮食主产区耕地压力空间分异及其影响因子实证研究与预警[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(8): 1493-1506. |
[5] | 李子琳, 韩逸, 郭熙, 国佳欣, 林雯璐. 基于结构方程模型的高安市耕地产能影响因素研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(5): 866-877. |
[6] | 黄锦东. 福建省粮食生产的耕地利用效应时空分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(5): 923-930. |
[7] | 罗海平, 潘柳欣, 余兆鹏. 基于粮食安全贡献度的中国粮食主产区粮食供求格局演变[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(11): 2077-2087. |
[8] | 张会芳, 尹海燕, 冀保毅, 卓文飞. 1980—2013年河南省粮食生产特点及安全保障机制研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(1): 1-7. |
[9] | 李福夺,杨兴洪*. 1999—2014年山东省粮食生产变化及增产驱动力研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(3): 535-. |
[10] | 杜会石1,滕泽宇1,王华2,陈智文1,*,陈艳楠1. 吉林省白城市生态系统服务价值预测研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2014, 26(6): 1583-. |
[11] | 张珏;张慧;*. 土地利用变化对嘉兴市生态系统服务价值损益的影响[J]. , 2014, 26(2): 0-444450. |
[12] | 田秋霞;张仁陟*. 社会转型期县域耕地需求量组合研究[J]. , 2014, 26(1): 0-176. |
[13] | 史常亮;王忠平*. 基于供求视角的中国粮食安全影响因素研究[J]. , 2013, 25(5): 0-1152. |
[14] | 张慧芳;吴宇哲;*;何良将. 我国推行休耕制度的探讨[J]. , 2013, 25(1): 0-170. |
[15] | 许连君;支炳义;刘卫东. 金华市区域土地利用变化及其驱动力分析[J]. , 2007, 19(2): 0-110. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||