浙江农业学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (10): 1834-1840.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2020.10.12

• 环境科学 • 上一篇    下一篇

浙江省新垦耕地土壤熟化指标研究

郑铭洁1, 姜铭北2, 章明奎3,*, 严建立4, 王道泽5   

  1. 1.建德市农业技术推广中心 土壤肥料站,浙江 建德 311600;
    2.淳安县农业技术推广中心 植保土肥站,浙江 淳安 311700;
    3.浙江大学 环境与资源学院,浙江 杭州 310058;
    4.杭州市农业科学研究院,浙江 杭州 310024;
    5.杭州市植保土肥服务总站,浙江 杭州 310020
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-24 出版日期:2020-10-25 发布日期:2020-11-16
  • 通讯作者: *章明奎,E-mail:mkzhang@zju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:郑铭洁(1987—),男,浙江建德人,学士,农艺师,主要从事农技推广方面的研究。E-mail:305484927@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省重点研发计划(2019C02035)

Study on soil maturity index of newly cultivated land in Zhejiang Province

ZHENG Mingjie1, JIANG Mingbei2, ZHANG Mingkui3,*, YAN Jianli4, WANG Daoze5   

  1. 1. Jiande Soil-Fertilizer Station, Jiande Agricultural Technology Extension Center, Jiande 311600, China;
    2. Chun'an Plant Protection and Soil-Fertilizer Station, Chun'an Agricultural Technology Extension Center, Chun'an 311700, China;
    3. College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;
    4. Hangzhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310024, China;
    5. Hangzhou Plant Protection and Soil-Fertilizer Station, Hangzhou 310020, China
  • Received:2020-04-24 Online:2020-10-25 Published:2020-11-16

摘要: 土壤熟化是新垦耕地培肥的重要过程,是土壤肥力和生产力逐渐提高的表现,但如何设定指标来判断土壤是否熟化至今还存在较大的分歧。为此,在对耕地土壤熟化的本质、土壤熟化与土壤质量的关系、熟土与生土的区别、熟化指标的选择进行分析的基础上,以浙江省为例,探讨了水田与旱地土壤的熟化指标与熟化标准。提出设立初步熟化和高度熟化二级熟化标准,分别对应土壤熟化的“下限”与“上限”的观点。认为熟化指标应针对土地利用中存在的问题而设计,可考虑用耕作层厚度、土壤有机质、pH、容重和盐分作为鉴别指标。土壤熟化的“上限”值可参照当前耕地质量评价中的高等级耕地评价标准作为鉴定依据;土壤熟化的“下限”值的制定应平衡农作物生长需求与区域培肥现实2个方面的关系。最后,基于浙江省典型耕地熟化前后土壤肥力性状的变化,结合国内土壤定量分类中的某些标准,分别提出了浙江省旱地和水田土壤熟化的鉴定指标和标准。

关键词: 新垦耕地, 熟化标准, 有机质, 酸碱度, 容重, 耕作层厚度

Abstract: Soil ripening is an important process of newly cultivated land fertilization, which is the performance of the gradual improvement of soil fertility and productivity. However, there is no consensus in the judgement of soil ripening. Based on the analysis of the nature of soil ripening of cultivated land, the relationship between soil ripening and soil quality, the difference between mature soil and raw soil, and the selection of ripening indexes, the present study discussed the ripening indexes and standards of paddy field and upland soil with Zhejiang as an example. The viewpoint of establishing two sets of standards was put forward, namely, the primary ripening standard and high ripening standard, which corresponded to the “lower limit” and “upper limit” of soil ripening, respectively. It was considered that the ripening indexes should be designed according to the problems in land use, and the cultivated layer thickness, soil organic matter, pH, bulk density and salt content could be considered as the ripening indexes. The “upper limit” value of soil ripening could be identified by referring to the evaluation standard of high-grade cultivated land in current cultivated land quality evaluation method. Meanwhile, the “lower limit” value of soil ripening should balance the relationship between crop growth demand and regional fertilization reality. Based on the analysis of the changes in the soil fertility before and after the ripenig of typical cultivated land, and combined with some standards of soil quantitative classification in China, the identification indexes and standards of upland and paddy field soil ripening in Zhejiang Province were proposed.

Key words: newly cultivated land, ripening standard, organic matter, pH value, bulk density, cultivated layer thickness

中图分类号: