不同栽培方式对韭菜生长和碳水化合物累积的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.02.12

浙江农业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 288-297.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.02.12

不同栽培方式对韭菜生长和碳水化合物累积的影响

王启璋¹(), 张广楠¹, 王丽慧¹, 田洁¹^,²^,^*()

1.青海大学农林科学院/青海省蔬菜遗传与生理重点实验室,青海西宁 810016
2.省部共建三江源生态与高原农牧业国家重点实验室,青海西宁 810016

收稿日期:2020-08-20 出版日期:2021-02-25 发布日期:2021-02-25
通讯作者: 田洁
作者简介:*田洁,E-mail: tiantian8092001@163.com
王启璋(1996—),男,青海湟中人,硕士研究生,主要从事蔬菜生理研究。E-mail: 2158767286@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(31760568);青海省科技厅重点实验室(2020-ZJ-Y02);青海省科技厅科技合作专项(2018-HZ-808);青海省科技厅科技成果转化专项(2019-NK-110)

Effects of different cultivation methods on growth and carbohydrate accumulation of Chinese chives

WANG Qizhang¹(), ZHANG Guangnan¹, WANG Lihui¹, TIAN Jie¹^,²^,^*()

1. Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences/Qinghai Key Laboratory of Vegetable Genetics and Physiology, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China
2. State Key Laboratory of Plateau Ecology and Agriculture, Xining 810016, China

Received:2020-08-20 Online:2021-02-25 Published:2021-02-25
Contact: TIAN Jie

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探究不同栽培方式对韭菜生长和碳水化合物累积的影响,以韭菜品种雪晶208为试材,测定其在土壤栽培、营养液栽培和基质栽培下农艺性状和可溶性糖组分及其含量的动态变化,并通过灰色关联分析了不同栽培方式下韭菜产量相关性状的主次关系,筛选出不同商品性状需求下韭菜的适宜栽培方式。结果表明:(1)在3种栽培方式下,营养液栽培更容易促进韭菜的快速生长,其株高、最大叶长、叶片数、假茎长增长最快,基质栽培次之,土壤栽培下韭菜生长最慢,但土壤栽培却有利于叶宽和假茎粗的生长。(2)不同栽培方式对韭菜产量的影响差异显著,营养液栽培利于韭菜单株产量的快速增加。整个生长周期,营养液栽培的韭菜地上部鲜重和干重始终高于其他栽培方式。培养至35 d,营养液栽培的韭菜地上部鲜重较土壤栽培、基质栽培分别提高了50.16%和63.70%,地上部干重较土壤栽培、基质栽培分别提高了11.07%、16.04%。(3)3种栽培方式下韭菜不同器官碳水化合物的含量差异显著,营养液栽培易使韭菜假茎中可溶性总糖和果糖快速累积。培养7~35 d,营养液栽培下韭菜不同器官的总糖与其他糖组分含量始终高于土壤栽培和基质栽培;其中,培养35 d假茎总糖的增幅显著高于叶的总糖增幅,且收获期假茎中蔗糖、葡萄糖、果糖含量较叶分别提高13.83%、12.31%、29.14%。(4)灰色关联分析发现,3种栽培方式下与韭菜单株产量关联紧密的指标均为可溶性糖组分与含量,影响营养液栽培、基质栽培和土壤栽培的首要因素分别为假茎蔗糖、叶蔗糖和叶葡萄糖。综上,在3种栽培方式中,营养液栽培是最利于韭菜快速生长与可溶性糖累积的栽培方式,其中假茎蔗糖含量是营养液栽培韭菜产量形成的关键因子,说明蔗糖的累积在韭菜营养液高产栽培中具有重要作用。

关键词: 韭菜, 栽培方式, 农艺指标, 可溶性糖组分, 灰色关联分析

Abstract:

In order to explore the effects of different cultivation methods on growth and carbohydrate accumulation of Chinese chives, with variety Xuejing 208 as material, the dynamic changes of agronomic characters and contents of soluble sugar components under soil cultivation, nutrient solution cultivation and substrate cultivation were measured. Based on grey relational analysis method, the primary and secondary relations between growth or soluble sugar factors and yield under different cultivation methods were analyzed, and the suitable cultivation methods for Chinese chives with different commercial characters were screened out. The results showed as follows: (1) Among the three cultivation methods, nutrient solution cultivation would easily promote the Chinese chives growth. Using nutrient solution cultivation, the growth rate of plant height, maximum leaf length, number of leaves and pseudostem length were the fastest; Substrate cultivation followed; The values of above-mentioned four indexes in soil cultivation were the lowest. However, soil cultivation was conducive to the growth of leaf width and pseudostem diameter. (2) Different cultivation methods could significantly affect the yield. Nutrient solution cultivation would enhance yield per plant rapidly. During the entire growth period, the aboveground fresh weight and dry weight in nutrient solution cultivation remain higher than those of other cultivations. On the 35th day, the fresh weight in nutrient solution cultivation respectively increased by 50.16% and 63.70%, and the dry weight in nutrient solution cultivation respectively increased by 11.07% and 16.04%, compared with those of soil cultivation and substrate cultivation. (3) The difference of carbohydrate content in different organs of Chinese chives under the three cultivation methods were significant. Nutrient solution cultivation would accelerate the accumulation of total soluble sugar and fructose in pseudostems. From the 7th day to the 35th day, content of total soluble sugar and their components in different organs with nutrient solution cultivation was higher than the values of soil cultivation and substrate cultivation. On the 35th day, growth of total soluble sugar content in pseudostems was significantly higher than that in leaves, and contents of sucrose, glucose and fructose in pseudostems increased by 13.83%, 12.31% and 29.14% respectively, comparing with those in leaves. (4) Grey relational analysis results showed that the indices closely related to Chinese chives yield per plant in three cultivation methods were the components and contents of soluble sugar. The key factors affecting nutrient solution cultivation, substrate cultivation and soil cultivation were sucrose content in pseudostems, sucrose content in leaves, glucose content in leaves, respectively. In summary, among the three cultivation methods, nutrient solution cultivation would be the most conductive way to grow rapidly and accumulate soluble sugar in Chinese chives, sucrose content in pseudostems was the key factor for the yield formation of Chinese chives under nutrient solution cultivation, which indicated that the accumulation of sucrose played an important role in the nutrient solution high-yield cultivation of Chinese chives.

Key words: Chinese chives, cultivation methods, agronomic trait, soluble sugar, grey correlation analysis

中图分类号:

S633.3

王启璋, 张广楠, 王丽慧, 田洁. 不同栽培方式对韭菜生长和碳水化合物累积的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(2): 288-297.

WANG Qizhang, ZHANG Guangnan, WANG Lihui, TIAN Jie. Effects of different cultivation methods on growth and carbohydrate accumulation of Chinese chives[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(2): 288-297.

图/表 5

图1 不同栽培方式对韭菜株高、最大叶长、叶宽、叶片数、假茎长与假茎粗的影响 a1、b1、c1…表示同一时期不同栽培方式间差异显著;a2、b2、c2…表示同一栽培方式不同生长时期间差异显著;下同。

Fig.1 Effects of different cultivation methods on the plant height, maximum leaf length, leaf width, number of blades, pseudostem length and pseudostem diameter of Chinese chives a1, b1, c1… indicated the significant difference (P<0.05) between different cultivation methods in the same growth stages; a2, b2, c2…indicated the significant difference (P<0.05) between different growth stages in the same cultivation methods. The same as below.

图2 不同栽培方式对韭菜地上部鲜重和地上部干重的影响

Fig.2 Effects of different cultivation methods on aboveground fresh weight and aboveground dry weight of Chinese chives

图3 不同栽培方式对韭菜叶和假茎中总糖含量的影响

Fig.3 Effects of different cultivation methods on total sugar content in leaves and pseudostems of Chinese chives

图4 不同栽培方式对韭菜叶片和假茎中蔗糖、葡萄糖、果糖含量的影响

Fig.4 Effects of different cultivation methods on contents of sucrose, glucose, fructose in leaves and pseudostems of Chinese chives

表1 不同栽培方式下地上部鲜重与农艺指标、可溶性糖组分的关联系数

Table 1 Correlation coefficient between fresh weight above ground and agronomic index and soluble sugar components under different cultivation methods

指标 Trait	土壤栽培 Soil cultivation
指标 Trait	关联系数 Correlation coefficient	排名 Rank	关联系数 Correlation coefficient	排名 Rank	关联系数 Correlation coefficient	排名 Rank
株高Plant height	0.158 4	11	0.365 0	8	0.212 3	8
假茎长Pseudostem length	0.155 9	8	0.358 8	3	0.204 1	6
假茎粗Pseudostem diameter	0.161 8	9	0.408 8	11	0.166 4	12
叶长 Leaf length	0.194 5	12	0.365 8	9	0.303 6	9
叶宽Leaf width	0.176 1	10	0.249 6	12	0.154 4	11
叶片数Number of blades	0.197 2	7	0.425 8	10	0.180 0	10
叶蔗糖Leaf sucrose	0.400 7	4	0.463 3	4	0.406 3	1
叶葡萄糖Leaf glucose	0.509 6	1	0.443 9	7	0.336 2	3
叶果糖Leaf fructose	0.466 4	3	0.433 8	2	0.293 7	7
假茎蔗糖Pseudostem sucrose	0.490 9	2	0.336 3	1	0.314 1	4
假茎葡萄糖Pseudostem glucose	0.369 1	5	0.472 7	6	0.342 5	2
假茎果糖Pseudostem fructose	0.328 7	6	0.306 9	5	0.312 3	5

参考文献 30

[1]	李怀志. 韭菜主要品质性状遗传规律的研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2004.
	LI H Z. The studies on the inheritance of main quality characters of Chinese chives[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2004. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	季延海. 韭菜营养液栽培的关键技术[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2014.
	JI Y H. The key technology of nutrient solutions cultivation of Chinese chives[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2014. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	翟莹, 周福君, 尹桂敏, 等. 不同基质对韭菜产量和品质的影响[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2019,41(6):660-669.
	ZHAI Y, ZHOU F J, YIN G M, et al. Effects of different substrates on yield and quality of Chinese chive[J]. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 2019,41(6):660-669.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	郭世荣. 无土栽培学[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2003.
[5]	刘婧. 无土栽培技术的应用与发展[J]. 北方园艺, 2012(16):204-206.
	LIU J. Application and development of soilless culture[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2012(16):204-206.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	靳力争, 刘如娥, 张学东, 等. 韭菜单株产量与相关性状的灰色关联度分析[J]. 现代农业科技, 2009(9):12-13.
	JIN L Z, LIU R E, ZHANG X D, et al. The gray relational grade analysis between the yield and the relative characters of individual leek[J]. Xiandai Nongye Keji, 2009(9):12-13.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	马树彬, 聂玉霞, 孟慧琴, 等. 韭菜单株产量因素的相关及通径分析[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2004(3):5-6.
	MA S B, NIE Y X, MENG H Q, et al. The correlation and path analysis of the factors forming the production of individual leek[J]. China Vegetables, 2004(3):5-6(in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	李万昌, 乔保建, 王俊伟, 等. 韭菜单株产量主要构成因素间的协调性分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2012,51(12):2502-2504.
	LI W C, QIAO B J, WANG J W, et al. Analysis on consistency among the main components of yield per plant of Allium tuberosum[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2012,51(12):2502-2504.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	ITAI A, TANAHASHI T . Inhibition of sucrose loss during cold storage in Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai) by 1-MCP[J]. Postharvest Biology & Technology, 2008,48(3):355-363.
[10]	BASSAL M, EL-HAMAHMY M. Hot water dip and preconditioning treatments to reduce chilling injury and maintain postharvest quality of Navel and Valencia oranges during cold quarantine[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2011,60(3):186-191. DOI URL
[11]	ZAHARAH S S, SINGH Z. Postharvest nitric oxide fumigation alleviates chilling injury, delays fruit ripening and maintains quality in cold-stored ‘Kensington Pride’ mango[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2011,60(3):202-210. DOI URL
[12]	陈苏丹. 欧李休眠期糖代谢特性研究[D]. 洛阳: 河南科技大学, 2010.
	CHEN S D. The study on sugar metabolism of dormant Cerasus humilis(Beg.) Sok[D]. Luoyang: Henan University of Science and Technology, 2010. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	CHAPIN F S, SCHULZE E, MOONEY H A. The ecology and economics of storage in plants[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1990,21(1):423-447. DOI URL
[14]	KOCH K E, YING Z, WU Y, et al. Multiple paths of sugar-sensing and a sugar/oxygen overlap for genes of sucrose and ethanol metabolism[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2000,51(Suppl.):417-427. DOI URL
[15]	赵江涛, 李晓峰, 李航, 等. 可溶性糖在高等植物代谢调节中的生理作用[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2006,34(24):6423-6425.
	ZHAO J T, LI X F, LI H, et al. Research on the role of the soluble sugar in the regulation of physiological metabolism in higher plant[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2006,34(24):6423-6425.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	DAMON S, HEWITT J, NIEDER M, et al. Sink metabolism in tomato fruit[J]. Plant Physiology, 1988,87(3):731-736. DOI URL PMID
[17]	邓聚龙. 灰色系统基本方法: 汉英对照[M]. 武汉:华中科技大学出版社, 2005.
[18]	尹鹏达, 赵丽娜, 朱文旭, 等. 氮磷钾配施对烤烟农艺性状和主要化学成分的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2012,26(2):375-379.
	YIN P D, ZHAO L N, ZHU W X, et al. Effect of combined application N, P and K fertilizer on agronomic characters and the main chemical components of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2012,26(2):375-379.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	纪薇, 郭荣荣, 王静波, 等. 无核葡萄胚败育生理生化因子灰色关联分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2019,46(8):1473-1485.
	JI W, GUO R R, WANG J B, et al. Grey correlation analysis of physiological and biochemical factors in embryo abortion of seedless grape[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2019,46(8):1473-1485.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	梁燕, 李锡香. 韭菜种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2007.
[21]	宋晓晖, 谢凯, 李艳丽, 等. HPLC-ELSD法测定梨果实中不同种类可溶性糖含量[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2012,35(2):87-91.
	SONG X H, XIE K, LI Y L, et al. Determination of contents and components of water-soluble sugar in pear fruit by HPLC-ELSD[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2012,35(2):87-91.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	李芳兰, 包维楷. 植物叶片形态解剖结构对环境变化的响应与适应[J]. 植物学通报, 2005,40(增刊1):118-127.
	LI F L, BAO W K. Responses of the morphological and anatomical structure of the plant leaf to environmental change[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2005,40(Suppl. 1):118-127.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	FARRAR J, POLLOCK C, GALLAGHER J. Sucrose and the integration of metabolism in vascular plants[J]. Plant Science, 2000,154(1):1-11. DOI URL PMID
[24]	刘晓冰, HERBERT S J, 金剑 , 等. 增加光照及其与改变源库互作对大豆产量构成因素的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2006,25(1):6-10.
	LIU X B, HERBERT S J, JIN J, et al. Light enrichment and its interactions with source-sink alteration on yield and yield components in soybean[J]. Soybean Science, 2006,25(1):6-10.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	刘春娟, 冯乃杰, 郑殿峰, 等. 植物生长调节剂S3307和DTA-6对大豆源库碳水化合物代谢及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(4):657-666. DOI URL
	LIU C J, FENG N J, ZHENG D F, et al. Effects of plant growth regulators S3307 and DTA-6 on carbohydrate content and yield in soybean[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016,49(4):657-666.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	李国辉, 周驰燕, 郭保卫, 等. 水稻蔗糖韧皮部装载及其与产量形成的关系[J]. 植物生理学报, 2019,55(7):891-901.
	LI G H, ZHOU C Y, GUO B W, et al. Sucrose phloem loading and its relationship with grain yield formation in rice[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2019,55(7):891-901. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	李国辉, 崔克辉. 水稻蔗糖转运及其与产量形成的关系[J]. 植物生理学报, 2014,50(6):735-740.
	LI G H, CUI K H. Sucrose translocation and its relationship with grain yield formation in rice[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2014,50(6):735-740. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	赖佳, 黄玲, 韦树谷, 等. 不结球白菜单株产量与主要农艺性状的灰色关联度分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019,35(32):36-41.
	LAI J, HUANG L, WEI S G, et al. Yield per plant and main agronomic traits of non-heading Chinese cabbage: grey relational degree analysis[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019,35(32):36-41.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	焦芳婵, 张谊寒, 卢秀萍. 烤烟主要化学成分与香气质的灰色关联度分析[J]. 作物研究, 2008,22(3):181-183.
	JIAO F C, ZHANG Y H, LU X P. Gray correlation analysis between principal chemical components and smoking aroma quality in flue-cured tobacco[J]. Crop Research, 2008,22(3):181-183.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	孙峰成, 冯勇, 于卓, 等. 12个玉米群体的主要农艺性状与产量、品质的灰色关联度分析[J]. 华北农学报, 2012,27(1):102-105. DOI URL
	SUN F C, FENG Y, YU Z, et al. Grey relativity analysis on main agronomic characters of 12 maize populations with their yields and traits[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2012,27(1):102-105.(in Chinese with English abstract)

不同栽培方式对韭菜生长和碳水化合物累积的影响

Effects of different cultivation methods on growth and carbohydrate accumulation of Chinese chives

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 30

相关文章 14

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	邓倩, 王羊, 邓群仙, 辛亚宁, 李雷, 龙星雨, 祝进, 张慧芬, 夏惠, 梁东. 蜀脆枣果实发育规律及品质积累特性分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(4): 644-652.
[2]	傅琳琳, 毛小报, 毛晓红, 李海涛, 王瑾. 浙江农业可持续发展水平与区域差异综合评价——基于高质量发展视角[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(10): 1880-1889.
[3]	张小虎, 孙茜. 河南省水土资源持续利用趋势及其影响因素[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(9): 1555-1563.
[4]	李敬蕊，王祥，田真，高洪波*，吴晓蕾. 外源喷施不同浓度γ\\|氨基丁酸对韭菜生长及氮代谢的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(9): 1563-.
[5]	赵天荣，徐志豪，施永泰，黄坚，张艳. 大花萱草在宁波地区观赏性和适应性的综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(4): 560-.
[6]	汪炳良，房婷婷，叶红霞*，石瑜. 栽培方式对哈密瓜光合速率和果实产量及品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2014, 26(4): 896-.
[7]	刘利花;尹昌斌*. 基于灰色关联的我国农村能源消费量及能源结构分析: 1999—2010[J]. , 2014, 26(2): 0-503509.
[8]	郑文俊. 乡村旅游地可达性评价——以广西柳州市7处典型乡村为例[J]. , 2013, 25(2): 0-398.
[9]	史永良;杜英;张爱宁*;张建韬. 灰色关联分析的甘肃马铃薯淀粉产业竞争力研究[J]. , 2012, 24(1): 0-168.
[10]	黄永红;李春雨;魏岳荣;左存武;易干军;* . 韭菜对香蕉枯萎病菌的拮抗及其对盆栽香蕉枯萎病发生的抑制作用[J]. , 2011, 23(6): 0-1166.
[11]	田和彬;汪军妹;华为;杨建明;*. 大麦主要农艺和品质性状的相关性及灰色关联度分析[J]. , 2011, 23(3): 0-438.
[12]	赵宁春;张小明;叶胜海;程方民;*. 不同栽培方式和施氮量对稻米营养品质及植酸积累的影响[J]. , 2009, 21(3): 0-263.
[13]	程建徽;吴江. 药(茶)用菊花品种(系)主要农艺性状的灰色关联度分析[J]. , 2007, 19(3): 0-232.
[14]	陈建明;陈忠其;俞晓平;郑许松;陈列忠;张珏锋. 九种无公害农药对铜绿金龟子和韭菜迟眼蕈蚊的毒力测定[J]. , 2006, 18(5): 0-324.