浙江农业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9): 1720-1729.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.09.16
贾洋洋1(
), 聂枞宁1, 罗兴禹1, 杨凯辉1, 何春雷1,2,*(
)
收稿日期:2020-08-19
出版日期:2021-09-25
发布日期:2021-10-09
作者简介:* 何春雷,E-mail: 502927016@qq.com通讯作者:
何春雷
基金资助:
JIA Yangyang1(
), NIE Zongning1, LUO Xingyu1, YANG Kaihui1, HE Chunlei1,2,*(
)
Received:2020-08-19
Online:2021-09-25
Published:2021-10-09
Contact:
HE Chunlei
摘要:
为解决藏茶加工过程中存在的渥堆时间长及微生物污染导致的安全隐患,探索藏茶加工新工艺,以绿毛茶为试验原料,添加从土豆中制备的外源酶,结合湿热转化加工藏茶,通过响应面分析研究最佳工艺参数,并与传统工艺制成的藏茶进行感官及滋味、色素与香气成分的对比分析。结果表明:以酶添加量80 U·g-1、茶坯含水量60%、发酵温度34 ℃、发酵时间7 h进行酶促转化,而后在温度80 ℃条件下湿热转化60 h工艺制成的藏茶比传统工艺藏茶的滋味更醇和,汤色更红亮,香气更纯正,无酸馊和风霉味。该工艺制成藏茶比传统藏茶水浸出物增加11.72百分点、茶黄素增加0.05百分点、茶红素增加1.47百分点、茶褐素增加0.28百分点,并产生了较多的花果香型香气物质,其中,具有百合花香、玉兰花香、铃兰香和木香的β-芳樟醇增加1.69百分点,具有木香花香的α-雪松醇增加0.49百分点,具有果香的香叶基丙酮增加2.27百分点,极大地改善了茶叶的风味品质。
中图分类号:
贾洋洋, 聂枞宁, 罗兴禹, 杨凯辉, 何春雷. 外源酶辅助发酵加工藏茶的工艺研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(9): 1720-1729.
JIA Yangyang, NIE Zongning, LUO Xingyu, YANG Kaihui, HE Chunlei. Study on processing technology of exogenous polyphenol oxidase assisted fermentation of Tibetan tea[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(9): 1720-1729.
| 水平 Levels | 酶量 Amount of enzyme/ (U·g-1) | 发酵温度 Fermentation temperature/℃ | 茶坯含水量 Tea billet water content/% | 发酵时间 Fermentation time/h |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1 | 60 | 30 | 50 | 7 |
| 0 | 80 | 32 | 55 | 8 |
| 1 | 100 | 34 | 60 | 9 |
表1 Box-Behnken 设计因素及水平
Table 1 Variables and levels of Box-Behnken design
| 水平 Levels | 酶量 Amount of enzyme/ (U·g-1) | 发酵温度 Fermentation temperature/℃ | 茶坯含水量 Tea billet water content/% | 发酵时间 Fermentation time/h |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1 | 60 | 30 | 50 | 7 |
| 0 | 80 | 32 | 55 | 8 |
| 1 | 100 | 34 | 60 | 9 |
| 指标 Index | 90~<99 | 80~<90 | 70~<80 | 权重 Statistical weight/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 外形 Appearance | 色泽黑褐油润,匀整,净度好 The color is black, brown, oily, even and good clarity | 色泽尚匀润,较匀整,净度较好 The color is acceptably even and smooth, with good clarity | 状实紧实,欠匀净 The shape is solid, tight and not even | 20 |
| 汤色 Liquor color | 红浓,明亮 Red thick, bright | 红浓,尚明亮 Red thick, acceptably bright | 红暗,浑浊 Red, dark, turbid | 15 |
| 香气 Aroma | 香气纯正,陈香高爽馥郁 Pure aroma, aging fragrant and lasting | 香气尚纯正,无杂气味 Acceptably pure aroma without miscellaneous smell | 香气欠纯 The aroma is not pure | 25 |
| 滋味 Taste | 醇厚,回味甘爽 Mellow, sweet aftertaste | 尚醇厚 Acceptably mellow | 欠纯 Impure | 30 |
| 叶底 Infused leaves | 黑褐,明亮,匀齐 Dark brown, bright, even | 黑褐,尚匀齐 Black brown, acceptably even | 黑褐,欠匀齐 Black brown, uneven | 10 |
表2 感官审评评分标准
Table 2 Standards of sensory evaluation
| 指标 Index | 90~<99 | 80~<90 | 70~<80 | 权重 Statistical weight/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 外形 Appearance | 色泽黑褐油润,匀整,净度好 The color is black, brown, oily, even and good clarity | 色泽尚匀润,较匀整,净度较好 The color is acceptably even and smooth, with good clarity | 状实紧实,欠匀净 The shape is solid, tight and not even | 20 |
| 汤色 Liquor color | 红浓,明亮 Red thick, bright | 红浓,尚明亮 Red thick, acceptably bright | 红暗,浑浊 Red, dark, turbid | 15 |
| 香气 Aroma | 香气纯正,陈香高爽馥郁 Pure aroma, aging fragrant and lasting | 香气尚纯正,无杂气味 Acceptably pure aroma without miscellaneous smell | 香气欠纯 The aroma is not pure | 25 |
| 滋味 Taste | 醇厚,回味甘爽 Mellow, sweet aftertaste | 尚醇厚 Acceptably mellow | 欠纯 Impure | 30 |
| 叶底 Infused leaves | 黑褐,明亮,匀齐 Dark brown, bright, even | 黑褐,尚匀齐 Black brown, acceptably even | 黑褐,欠匀齐 Black brown, uneven | 10 |
| 实验 Trial | A | B | C | D | 审评得分 Sensory score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 89.30 |
| 9 | -1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 85.51 |
| 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 86.57 |
| 19 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 89.14 |
| 14 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 83.97 |
| 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 90.41 |
| 18 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 83.04 |
| 1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 85.43 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 83.81 |
| 22 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 86.29 |
| 2 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 85.34 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 90.21 |
| 7 27 17 16 11 24 23 29 15 25 28 21 12 10 3 4 | 0 0 -1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 -1 1 | 0 0 0 1 0 1 -1 0 -1 0 0 -1 0 0 1 1 | -1 0 -1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 | 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 -1 1 -1 0 0 | 83.68 86.92 83.16 90.37 85.42 86.16 86.68 86.46 90.28 86.85 86.38 86.73 85.79 85.80 85.68 85.71 |
表3 Box-Behnken 实验设计结果
Table 3 Experiment design and results of Box-Behnken design
| 实验 Trial | A | B | C | D | 审评得分 Sensory score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 89.30 |
| 9 | -1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 85.51 |
| 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 86.57 |
| 19 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 89.14 |
| 14 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 83.97 |
| 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 90.41 |
| 18 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 83.04 |
| 1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 85.43 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 83.81 |
| 22 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 86.29 |
| 2 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 85.34 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 90.21 |
| 7 27 17 16 11 24 23 29 15 25 28 21 12 10 3 4 | 0 0 -1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 -1 1 | 0 0 0 1 0 1 -1 0 -1 0 0 -1 0 0 1 1 | -1 0 -1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 | 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 -1 1 -1 0 0 | 83.68 86.92 83.16 90.37 85.42 86.16 86.68 86.46 90.28 86.85 86.38 86.73 85.79 85.80 85.68 85.71 |
| 方差来 Source of variation | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value | P值 P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型Model | 131.64 | 14 | 9.40 | 165.75 | <0.000 1 |
| A | 0.034 | 1 | 0.034 | 0.60 | 0.450 8 |
| B | 7.500×10-5 | 1 | 7.500×10-5 | 1.322×10-3 | 0.971 5 |
| C | 122.24 | 1 | 122.24 | 2 154.76 | <0.000 1 |
| D | 0.031 | 1 | 0.031 | 0.55 | 0.471 9 |
| AB | 3.600×10-3 | 1 | 3.600×10-3 | 0.063 | 0.804 8 |
| AC | 0.020 | 1 | 0.020 | 0.35 | 0.566 0 |
| AD | 1.600×10-3 | 1 | 1.600×10-3 | 0.028 | 0.869 0 |
| BC | 4.225×10-3 | 1 | 4.225×10-3 | 0.074 | 0.788 9 |
| BD | 1.600×10-3 | 1 | 1.600×10-3 | 0.028 | 0.869 0 |
| CD | 1.225×10-3 | 1 | 1.225×10-3 | 0.022 | 0.885 3 |
| A2 | 6.13 | 1 | 6.13 | 108.06 | <0.000 1 |
| B2 | 0.051 | 1 | 0.051 | 0.89 | 0.360 5 |
| C2 | 1.64 | 1 | 1.64 | 28.91 | <0.000 1 |
| D2 | 0.037 | 1 | 0.037 | 0.66 | 0.430 5 |
| 残差Residual error | 0.79 | 14 | 0.057 | — | — |
| 失拟误差Lack of fit | 0.57 | 10 | 0.057 | 1.00 | 0.549 5 |
| 纯误差Pure error | 0.23 | 4 | 0.057 | — | — |
| 总计Sum total | 132.44 | 28 | — | — | — |
表4 响应面方差分析
Table 4 Analysis of variance for the developed regression
| 方差来 Source of variation | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value | P值 P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型Model | 131.64 | 14 | 9.40 | 165.75 | <0.000 1 |
| A | 0.034 | 1 | 0.034 | 0.60 | 0.450 8 |
| B | 7.500×10-5 | 1 | 7.500×10-5 | 1.322×10-3 | 0.971 5 |
| C | 122.24 | 1 | 122.24 | 2 154.76 | <0.000 1 |
| D | 0.031 | 1 | 0.031 | 0.55 | 0.471 9 |
| AB | 3.600×10-3 | 1 | 3.600×10-3 | 0.063 | 0.804 8 |
| AC | 0.020 | 1 | 0.020 | 0.35 | 0.566 0 |
| AD | 1.600×10-3 | 1 | 1.600×10-3 | 0.028 | 0.869 0 |
| BC | 4.225×10-3 | 1 | 4.225×10-3 | 0.074 | 0.788 9 |
| BD | 1.600×10-3 | 1 | 1.600×10-3 | 0.028 | 0.869 0 |
| CD | 1.225×10-3 | 1 | 1.225×10-3 | 0.022 | 0.885 3 |
| A2 | 6.13 | 1 | 6.13 | 108.06 | <0.000 1 |
| B2 | 0.051 | 1 | 0.051 | 0.89 | 0.360 5 |
| C2 | 1.64 | 1 | 1.64 | 28.91 | <0.000 1 |
| D2 | 0.037 | 1 | 0.037 | 0.66 | 0.430 5 |
| 残差Residual error | 0.79 | 14 | 0.057 | — | — |
| 失拟误差Lack of fit | 0.57 | 10 | 0.057 | 1.00 | 0.549 5 |
| 纯误差Pure error | 0.23 | 4 | 0.057 | — | — |
| 总计Sum total | 132.44 | 28 | — | — | — |
| 工艺 Process | 外形(10%) Appearance | 汤色(20%) Liquor color | 香气(20%) Aroma | 滋味(40%) Taste | 叶底(10%) Infused leaves | 加权总分 The weighted total score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 酶处理新工艺 New process of enzyme treatment | 色泽黑褐乌润、 外形紧卷、完整 The color is black, brown, moist, tight and complete(87) | 红浓明亮 Red and bright(90.7) | 陈香显著,甜香略显 Aging aroma is obvious, and the sweet aroma is slightly obvious(91.7) | 醇厚回甘 Mellow and sweet(92.3) | 黑褐匀整,柔软 Black and brown, even and soft(89.9) | 91.09 |
| 传统工艺 Traditional processing technique | 色泽黑褐、外形较紧卷、完整 The color is black and brown, and the shape is acceptably tight and complete(83.3) | 红,尚明亮 Red, acceptably bright(88.3) | 陈香显著,略带 酸霉味 It has obvious aging aroma and slightly sour and musty taste(88.7) | 醇,尚厚 Mellow, acceptably thick (90.7) | 黑褐,尚柔软 Black brown, acceptably soft(89) | 88.91 |
表5 两种工艺成品茶感官审评
Table 5 Two processes finished tea sensory evaluation
| 工艺 Process | 外形(10%) Appearance | 汤色(20%) Liquor color | 香气(20%) Aroma | 滋味(40%) Taste | 叶底(10%) Infused leaves | 加权总分 The weighted total score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 酶处理新工艺 New process of enzyme treatment | 色泽黑褐乌润、 外形紧卷、完整 The color is black, brown, moist, tight and complete(87) | 红浓明亮 Red and bright(90.7) | 陈香显著,甜香略显 Aging aroma is obvious, and the sweet aroma is slightly obvious(91.7) | 醇厚回甘 Mellow and sweet(92.3) | 黑褐匀整,柔软 Black and brown, even and soft(89.9) | 91.09 |
| 传统工艺 Traditional processing technique | 色泽黑褐、外形较紧卷、完整 The color is black and brown, and the shape is acceptably tight and complete(83.3) | 红,尚明亮 Red, acceptably bright(88.3) | 陈香显著,略带 酸霉味 It has obvious aging aroma and slightly sour and musty taste(88.7) | 醇,尚厚 Mellow, acceptably thick (90.7) | 黑褐,尚柔软 Black brown, acceptably soft(89) | 88.91 |
| 工艺 Process | 儿茶素 Catechins/ (mg·g-1) | 茶多酚 Tea polyphenol/% | 氨基酸 Amino acid/% | 可溶性糖 soluble sugar/% | 酚氨比 Phenol ammonia ratio | 水浸出物 Water extracts/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 新工艺New | 4.47±0.25 a | 9.25±0.42 a | 2.02±0.03 a | 9.58±0.32 a | 2.21±0.02 a | 48.45±0.06 a |
| 传统工艺Traditional | 4.09±0.35 b | 5.59±0.84 a | 0.68±0.01 b | 5.70±0.24 b | 6.01±0.05 b | 36.73±4.35 b |
表6 两种工艺常规滋味成分比较表
Table 6 Two processes conventional ingredients taste comparison table
| 工艺 Process | 儿茶素 Catechins/ (mg·g-1) | 茶多酚 Tea polyphenol/% | 氨基酸 Amino acid/% | 可溶性糖 soluble sugar/% | 酚氨比 Phenol ammonia ratio | 水浸出物 Water extracts/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 新工艺New | 4.47±0.25 a | 9.25±0.42 a | 2.02±0.03 a | 9.58±0.32 a | 2.21±0.02 a | 48.45±0.06 a |
| 传统工艺Traditional | 4.09±0.35 b | 5.59±0.84 a | 0.68±0.01 b | 5.70±0.24 b | 6.01±0.05 b | 36.73±4.35 b |
| 工艺Process | 茶黄素Theaflavins | 茶红素Thearubigins | 茶褐素Theabrownine |
|---|---|---|---|
| 新工艺New | 0.11±0.01 a | 4.30±0.02 a | 8.09±0.19 a |
| 传统工艺Traditional | 0.06±0.01 b | 2.83±0.02 b | 7.81±0.10 b |
表7 二种工艺茶色素含量比较表
Table 7 Two processes of tea pigment content comparison table %
| 工艺Process | 茶黄素Theaflavins | 茶红素Thearubigins | 茶褐素Theabrownine |
|---|---|---|---|
| 新工艺New | 0.11±0.01 a | 4.30±0.02 a | 8.09±0.19 a |
| 传统工艺Traditional | 0.06±0.01 b | 2.83±0.02 b | 7.81±0.10 b |
| 香气成分 Aroma component | 分子式 Formula | 香气特征 Aroma characteristics | 含量Content/% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 新工艺 New | 传统工艺 Traditional | |||
| β-芳樟醇Beta linalool | C10H18O | 百合花香、玉兰花香、铃兰香和木香 Greenish lily magnolia flower aroma woody aroma | 5.93 | 4.24 |
| 香叶醇Geraniol | C10H18O | 玫瑰、蔷薇花香Roses aroma | 4.15 | 7.88 |
| 橙花叔醇Nerolidol | C15H26O | 清甜玫瑰香Roses aroma | 2.32 | 3.41 |
| α-萜品醇Alpha terpineol | C10H18O | 具有丁香香气Syzygium aromaticum aroma | 2.26 | 3.74 |
| 脱氢芳樟醇Dehydrolinalool | C10H16O | 花香、木香Floral and woody | 1.67 | 1.90 |
| α-雪松醇Alpha cedrol | C15H26O | 木香、类似檀香并带花香Woody sandalwood like and floral | 1.18 | 0.69 |
| 植醇Phytol | C20H40O | 芳香气味Aromatic odor | 0.35 | 3.71 |
| 顺-氧化芳樟醇Ⅱ cis-linalool Ⅱ oxide | C10H18O2 | 木香、花香、萜香、清香Woody floral terpene aroma fragrance | 0.67 | 3.35 |
| 香叶基丙酮Geranyl acetone | C13H22O | 果香、木香Fruity woody | 4.57 | 2.30 |
| 苯乙酮Hypnone | C8H8O | 愉悦香气Pleasant aroma | 4.37 | 2.00 |
| β-紫罗酮Beta-ionone | C13H20O | 紫萝兰香、甜花香Purple lilac sweet flowers | 3.67 | 8.31 |
| 顺-茉莉酮cis-jasmonone | C11H16O | 茉莉花香The jasmine incense | 0.94 | 2.41 |
| 6-甲基-5-庚烯-2-酮 6-Methyl-5-heptene-2-ketone | C8H14O | 青草气味Smell the grass | 0.20 | 0.72 |
| 2,3-环氧-β-紫罗酮 2,3-Epoxy-β-rhodopone | C13H20O2 | 陈气味Aroma after aging | 0.42 | 1.83 |
| 癸醛Decanal | C10H20O | 橙香、柠檬香Orange lemon | 4.91 | 0.91 |
| 苯甲醛Benzaldehyde | C7H6O | 风信子香、水果甜香Sweet hyacinth sweet fruit | 3.67 | 5.18 |
| 壬醛Nonanal | C9H18O | 玫瑰、柑橘等香气The aroma of roses oranges etc | 3.66 | 1.01 |
| β-环柠檬醛Beta cyclocitral | C10H16O | 果香和清香Fruity and fragrant | 1.53 | 2.86 |
| 反-柠檬醛trans-citral | C10H16O | 柠檬香、香叶香Fragrant lemon fragrant bay leaf | 1.28 | 0.46 |
| 顺-2-壬烯醛 cis-2-nonenal | C9H16O | 脂肪气息、青香、蜡香、黄瓜香、甜瓜香 Smell of fat green wax cucumber melon | 1.17 | 1.02 |
| 反-2-反-4-庚二烯醛 trans-2-trans-4-heptadienal | C7H10O | 呈青草、水果似香气 Grass and fruit | 1.15 | 1.02 |
| 反-2-顺-6-壬二烯醛 trans-2-cis-6-nonadienal | C9H14O | 具有强烈的紫罗兰和黄瓜似香气 Intense violet and cucumber-like aromas | 0.74 | 0.20 |
| 2-呋喃甲醛2-Furfural | C5H4O2 | 具有特殊香味Special fragrance | 0.46 | 0.27 |
| 辛醛Octanal | C8H16O | 水果香Aztique | 0.45 | 0.24 |
| 反-2-辛烯醛 trans-2-octenal | C8H14O | 脂肪和肉类香气,并有黄瓜和鸡肉香 Fat and meat aroma, cucumber and chicken aroma | 0.62 | 0.77 |
| 水杨酸甲酯Methyl salicylate | C8H8O3 | 冬青叶香味Holly leaves aroma | 2.16 | 2.25 |
| 二氢猕猴桃内酯Dihydroactinidiolide | C11H16O2 | 甜桃香、香豆素及麝香味Sweet peach coumarin and musk | 1.81 | 2.18 |
| δ-杜松烯δ-Cadinene | C15H24 | 木香Elecampane | 7.49 | 2.10 |
| 顺-己酸-3-己烯酯 cis-hexanoic acid-3-hexene ester | C12H22O2 | 水果香Aztique | 1.43 | 1.12 |
| 柠檬烯Limonene | C10H16 | 柠檬香Lemon zest | 3.45 | 2.88 |
| α-法尼烯Alpha farnesene | C15H24 | 花香Potpourri | 1.1 | 3.10 |
| L-菖薄烯L-Calamenene | C15H22 | 具有香味Fragrance | 1.17 | 1.14 |
| β-丁香烯Beta caryophyllene | C15H24 | 具有淡的丁香似香味Clove aroma | 0.81 | 0.91 |
| 顺-β-罗勒烯cis-β-rotene | C10H16 | 甜香,花香Sweet floral | 0.74 | 0.64 |
| 苯乙烯Phenylethylene | C8H8 | 具有特殊香气Special aroma | 0.65 | 0.69 |
| 月桂烯Myrcene | C10H16 | 木香及热带水果香Woody and tropical fruit aromas | 0.59 | 0.96 |
| τ-萜品烯Tau-terpinene | C10H16 | 具有香味Fragrance | 0.32 | 0.52 |
| 1-乙基-2-甲酰吡咯 1-Ethyl-2-formylpyrrole | C7H9NO | 具有桂皮香味Cinnamon aroma | 5.87 | 1.66 |
| 2-乙酰吡咯 2-Hexyl pyrrole | C6H7NO | 具有核桃、甘草、烤面包、炒榛子和鱼样的香气 Aromas of walnut, licorice, toast, Fried hazelnut | 2.05 | 1.51 |
| 橄榄醇Elemol | C11H16O2 | 4.83 | 4.47 | |
| 6,10,14-三甲基-十五烷-2-酮 6,10, 14-Trimethyl-pentadecane-2-ketone | C18H36O | 2.20 | 1.26 | |
| 2,6,6-三甲基环己烷酮 2,6, 6-Trimethylcyclohexanone | C9H16O | 0.48 | 0.49 | |
| 2-甲基-3-辛酮2-Methyl-3-octyl | C9H18O | 0.18 | 1.05 | |
| 糠醛Furfural | C5H4O2 | 有类似苯甲醛的特殊气味Special smell | 0.46 | 0.27 |
| 香叶酸甲酯Methyl geranate | C11H18O2 | 0.79 | 2.02 | |
| 二甲基戊酸甲酯Methyl dimethyl valerate | C8H16O2 | 1.96 | 5.19 | |
| β-荜澄茄油烯Beta cubebene | C15H24 | 1.26 | 0.28 | |
| 1-已基吡咯1-Hexyl pyrrole | C6H9N | 1.08 | 0.20 | |
| 2-乙烯基-1,1-二甲基-3-亚甲基-环己烷 2-Vinyl-1,1-dimethyl-3-methylene-cyclohexane | C11H18 | 3.27 | 1.52 | |
| 1,1,6-三甲基-1,2-二氢化萘 1,1, 6-Trimethyl-1, 2-dihydronaphthalene | C13H16 | 1.57 | 1.41 | |
| 2-正戊基呋喃2-Pentylfuran | C9H14O | 豆香、果香Beans and fruit aroma | 0.31 | 0.79 |
表8 两种工艺茶样香气物质相对比例比较
Table 8 Comparison of the relative proportions of the tea aroma substance in two processes
| 香气成分 Aroma component | 分子式 Formula | 香气特征 Aroma characteristics | 含量Content/% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 新工艺 New | 传统工艺 Traditional | |||
| β-芳樟醇Beta linalool | C10H18O | 百合花香、玉兰花香、铃兰香和木香 Greenish lily magnolia flower aroma woody aroma | 5.93 | 4.24 |
| 香叶醇Geraniol | C10H18O | 玫瑰、蔷薇花香Roses aroma | 4.15 | 7.88 |
| 橙花叔醇Nerolidol | C15H26O | 清甜玫瑰香Roses aroma | 2.32 | 3.41 |
| α-萜品醇Alpha terpineol | C10H18O | 具有丁香香气Syzygium aromaticum aroma | 2.26 | 3.74 |
| 脱氢芳樟醇Dehydrolinalool | C10H16O | 花香、木香Floral and woody | 1.67 | 1.90 |
| α-雪松醇Alpha cedrol | C15H26O | 木香、类似檀香并带花香Woody sandalwood like and floral | 1.18 | 0.69 |
| 植醇Phytol | C20H40O | 芳香气味Aromatic odor | 0.35 | 3.71 |
| 顺-氧化芳樟醇Ⅱ cis-linalool Ⅱ oxide | C10H18O2 | 木香、花香、萜香、清香Woody floral terpene aroma fragrance | 0.67 | 3.35 |
| 香叶基丙酮Geranyl acetone | C13H22O | 果香、木香Fruity woody | 4.57 | 2.30 |
| 苯乙酮Hypnone | C8H8O | 愉悦香气Pleasant aroma | 4.37 | 2.00 |
| β-紫罗酮Beta-ionone | C13H20O | 紫萝兰香、甜花香Purple lilac sweet flowers | 3.67 | 8.31 |
| 顺-茉莉酮cis-jasmonone | C11H16O | 茉莉花香The jasmine incense | 0.94 | 2.41 |
| 6-甲基-5-庚烯-2-酮 6-Methyl-5-heptene-2-ketone | C8H14O | 青草气味Smell the grass | 0.20 | 0.72 |
| 2,3-环氧-β-紫罗酮 2,3-Epoxy-β-rhodopone | C13H20O2 | 陈气味Aroma after aging | 0.42 | 1.83 |
| 癸醛Decanal | C10H20O | 橙香、柠檬香Orange lemon | 4.91 | 0.91 |
| 苯甲醛Benzaldehyde | C7H6O | 风信子香、水果甜香Sweet hyacinth sweet fruit | 3.67 | 5.18 |
| 壬醛Nonanal | C9H18O | 玫瑰、柑橘等香气The aroma of roses oranges etc | 3.66 | 1.01 |
| β-环柠檬醛Beta cyclocitral | C10H16O | 果香和清香Fruity and fragrant | 1.53 | 2.86 |
| 反-柠檬醛trans-citral | C10H16O | 柠檬香、香叶香Fragrant lemon fragrant bay leaf | 1.28 | 0.46 |
| 顺-2-壬烯醛 cis-2-nonenal | C9H16O | 脂肪气息、青香、蜡香、黄瓜香、甜瓜香 Smell of fat green wax cucumber melon | 1.17 | 1.02 |
| 反-2-反-4-庚二烯醛 trans-2-trans-4-heptadienal | C7H10O | 呈青草、水果似香气 Grass and fruit | 1.15 | 1.02 |
| 反-2-顺-6-壬二烯醛 trans-2-cis-6-nonadienal | C9H14O | 具有强烈的紫罗兰和黄瓜似香气 Intense violet and cucumber-like aromas | 0.74 | 0.20 |
| 2-呋喃甲醛2-Furfural | C5H4O2 | 具有特殊香味Special fragrance | 0.46 | 0.27 |
| 辛醛Octanal | C8H16O | 水果香Aztique | 0.45 | 0.24 |
| 反-2-辛烯醛 trans-2-octenal | C8H14O | 脂肪和肉类香气,并有黄瓜和鸡肉香 Fat and meat aroma, cucumber and chicken aroma | 0.62 | 0.77 |
| 水杨酸甲酯Methyl salicylate | C8H8O3 | 冬青叶香味Holly leaves aroma | 2.16 | 2.25 |
| 二氢猕猴桃内酯Dihydroactinidiolide | C11H16O2 | 甜桃香、香豆素及麝香味Sweet peach coumarin and musk | 1.81 | 2.18 |
| δ-杜松烯δ-Cadinene | C15H24 | 木香Elecampane | 7.49 | 2.10 |
| 顺-己酸-3-己烯酯 cis-hexanoic acid-3-hexene ester | C12H22O2 | 水果香Aztique | 1.43 | 1.12 |
| 柠檬烯Limonene | C10H16 | 柠檬香Lemon zest | 3.45 | 2.88 |
| α-法尼烯Alpha farnesene | C15H24 | 花香Potpourri | 1.1 | 3.10 |
| L-菖薄烯L-Calamenene | C15H22 | 具有香味Fragrance | 1.17 | 1.14 |
| β-丁香烯Beta caryophyllene | C15H24 | 具有淡的丁香似香味Clove aroma | 0.81 | 0.91 |
| 顺-β-罗勒烯cis-β-rotene | C10H16 | 甜香,花香Sweet floral | 0.74 | 0.64 |
| 苯乙烯Phenylethylene | C8H8 | 具有特殊香气Special aroma | 0.65 | 0.69 |
| 月桂烯Myrcene | C10H16 | 木香及热带水果香Woody and tropical fruit aromas | 0.59 | 0.96 |
| τ-萜品烯Tau-terpinene | C10H16 | 具有香味Fragrance | 0.32 | 0.52 |
| 1-乙基-2-甲酰吡咯 1-Ethyl-2-formylpyrrole | C7H9NO | 具有桂皮香味Cinnamon aroma | 5.87 | 1.66 |
| 2-乙酰吡咯 2-Hexyl pyrrole | C6H7NO | 具有核桃、甘草、烤面包、炒榛子和鱼样的香气 Aromas of walnut, licorice, toast, Fried hazelnut | 2.05 | 1.51 |
| 橄榄醇Elemol | C11H16O2 | 4.83 | 4.47 | |
| 6,10,14-三甲基-十五烷-2-酮 6,10, 14-Trimethyl-pentadecane-2-ketone | C18H36O | 2.20 | 1.26 | |
| 2,6,6-三甲基环己烷酮 2,6, 6-Trimethylcyclohexanone | C9H16O | 0.48 | 0.49 | |
| 2-甲基-3-辛酮2-Methyl-3-octyl | C9H18O | 0.18 | 1.05 | |
| 糠醛Furfural | C5H4O2 | 有类似苯甲醛的特殊气味Special smell | 0.46 | 0.27 |
| 香叶酸甲酯Methyl geranate | C11H18O2 | 0.79 | 2.02 | |
| 二甲基戊酸甲酯Methyl dimethyl valerate | C8H16O2 | 1.96 | 5.19 | |
| β-荜澄茄油烯Beta cubebene | C15H24 | 1.26 | 0.28 | |
| 1-已基吡咯1-Hexyl pyrrole | C6H9N | 1.08 | 0.20 | |
| 2-乙烯基-1,1-二甲基-3-亚甲基-环己烷 2-Vinyl-1,1-dimethyl-3-methylene-cyclohexane | C11H18 | 3.27 | 1.52 | |
| 1,1,6-三甲基-1,2-二氢化萘 1,1, 6-Trimethyl-1, 2-dihydronaphthalene | C13H16 | 1.57 | 1.41 | |
| 2-正戊基呋喃2-Pentylfuran | C9H14O | 豆香、果香Beans and fruit aroma | 0.31 | 0.79 |
| [1] |
OI Y, HOU I C, FUJITA H, et al. Antiobesity effects of Chinese black tea (Pu-erh tea) extract and gallic acid[J]. Phytotherapy Research, 2012, 26(4):475-481.
DOI URL |
| [2] |
CAO Z H, GU D H, LIN Q Y, et al. Effect of Pu-erh tea on body fat and lipid profiles in rats with diet-induced obesity[J]. Phytotherapy Research, 2011, 25(2):234-238.
DOI URL |
| [3] | 胡燕, 齐桂年. 我国不同产地黑茶的HPLC-DAD-ELSD指纹图谱研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2014, 35(13):300-304. |
| HU Y, QI G N. Study on the HPLC-DAD-ELSD fingerprinting of dark teas from different regions in China[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2014, 35(13):300-304.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [4] | 陈应娟, 齐桂年, 陈盛相, 等. 四川黑茶加工过程中感官品质和化学成分的变化[J]. 食品科学, 2012, 33(23):55-59. |
| CHEN Y J, QI G N, CHEN S X, et al. Changes in sensory quality and chemical composition of Sichuan brick tea during processing[J]. Food Science, 2012, 33(23):55-59.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [5] | 姜依何, 胥伟, 朱旗. 黑茶真菌污染研究进展及探讨[J]. 茶叶科学, 2018, 38(3):227-236. |
| JIANG Y H, XU W, ZHU Q. Research progress and discussion on fungal contamination of dark tea[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2018, 38(3):227-236.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [6] | 赵冰, 李中皓, 陈再根, 等. 外源多酚氧化酶对普洱茶品质的影响研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(30):14940-14943. |
| ZHAO B, LI Z H, CHEN Z G, et al. Effects of PPO of different enzyme sources on the quality of Puer-tea[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 40(30):14940-14943.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [7] | 杨富亚, 许波, 李俊俊, 等. 普洱茶渥堆过程中复合酶制剂的应用研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2013, 41(9):4057-4060. |
| YANG F Y, XU B, LI J J, et al. Application of complex enzymes during pile-fermentation of Pu’er tea[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 41(9):4057-4060.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [8] | 梁晓岚. 外源酶制剂提高茶叶品质研究进展[J]. 广东茶业, 2000(1):9-11. |
| LIANG X L. Research progress on improving tea quality by exogenous enzymes[J]. Guang Dong Tea, 2000(1):9-11. | |
| [9] | 肖文军, 刘仲华, 黎星辉. 茶叶加工中的外源酶研究进展[J]. 天然产物研究与开发, 2003, 15(3):264-267. |
| XIAO W J, LIU Z H, LI X H. Advances of external enzyme in tea processing[J]. Natural Product Research and Development, 2003, 15(3):264-267.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [10] | 李艳, 何春雷, 孟雪莉, 等. 干热后处理改善夏季成品绿茶风味品质研究[J]. 食品与机械, 2016, 32(12):189-195. |
| LI Y, HE C L, MENG X L, et al. Study on quality improving in flavor of finished summer green tea by dry-heat post-treatment[J]. Food & Machinery, 2016, 32(12):189-195.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [11] | 黄意欢. 茶学实验技术[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1997. |
| [12] | 郑鹏程, 刘盼盼, 王胜鹏, 等. 5种黑茶香气成分的比较分析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2018, 39(22):82-86. |
| ZHENG P C, LIU P P, WANG S P, et al. Comparative analysis of the aroma components in five kinds of dark tea[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2018, 39(22):82-86.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [13] | 杨悦, 华再欣, 张海伟, 等. 定量描述分析在茶汤滋味评定中的应用[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2015, 6(5):1619-1625. |
| YANG Y, HUA Z X, ZHANG H W, et al. Application of quantitative descriptive analysis(QDA) method in sensory evaluation of tea infusion taste[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2015, 6(5):1619-1625.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [14] | WANG K B, RUAN J Y. Analysis of chemical components in green tea in relation with perceived quality, a case study with Longjing teas[J]. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 2009, 44(12):2476-2484. |
| [15] | 赖兆祥, 黄国滋, 庞式, 等. 陈香茶适制品种筛选研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2009, 36(10):54-55. |
| LAI Z X, HUANG G Z, PANG S, et al. Study on selection of suitable products of aging tea[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 36(10):54-55.(in Chinese) | |
| [16] | 杨新河, 李勤, 黄建安, 等. 普洱茶茶色素提取工艺条件的响应面分析及其抗氧化性活性研究[J]. 食品科学, 2011, 32(6):1-6. |
|
YANG X H, LI Q, HUANG J A, et al. Optimization of process conditions for Pu-erh tea pigment extraction by response surface analysis and its antioxidant activity[J]. Food Science, 2011, 32(6):1-6.(in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
|
| [17] |
WANG Q P, PENG C X, GONG J S. Effects of enzymatic action on the formation of theabrownin during solid state fermentation of Pu-erh tea[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2011, 91(13):2412-2418.
DOI URL |
| [18] | 邹瑶, 齐桂年, 刘婷婷, 等. 四川黑茶渥堆中品质成分的主成分及聚类分析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2014, 35(15):304-307. |
| ZOU Y, QI G N, LIU T T, et al. Principal component and cluster analysis of the quality ingredients of Sichuan dark tea during post-fermentation[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2014, 35(15):304-307.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [19] |
XIE G X, YE M, WANG Y G, et al. Characterization of Pu-erh tea using chemical and metabolic profiling approaches[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2009, 57(8):3046-3054.
DOI URL |
| [20] | 蒋萍萍, 伍琳琳, 王铁龙, 等. 黑茶的研究进展[J]. 农产品加工, 2020(5):73-78. |
| JIANG P P, WU L L, WANG T L, et al. Research progress of black tea[J]. Farm Products Processing, 2020(5):73-78.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [21] | 吕海鹏, 钟秋生, 林智. 陈香普洱茶的香气成分研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2009, 29(3):219-224. |
| LYU H P, ZHONG Q S, LIN Z. Study on the aroma components in Pu-erh tea with stale flavor[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2009, 29(3):219-224.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [22] | 吕海鹏, 钟秋生, 王力, 等. 普洱茶加工过程中香气成分的变化规律研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2009, 29(2):95-101. |
| LU H P, ZHONG Q S, WANG L, et al. Study on the change of aroma constituents during Pu-erh tea process[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2009, 29(2):95-101.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [23] | 林夏丹, 李中皓, 刘通讯, 等. 不同酶处理对普洱茶香气成分的影响研究[J]. 现代食品科技, 2008, 24(5):420-423. |
| LIN X D, LI Z H, LIU T X, et al. Effects of enzymatic treatments on the aromatic components of Puer tea[J]. Modern Food Science and Technology, 2008, 24(5):420-423.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [24] | 付润华, 齐桂年. 黑茶渥堆作用的研究进展与展望[J]. 福建茶叶, 2007, 29(4):6-8. |
| FU R H, QI G N. Research progress in the function of wet compost of black tea and its prospect[J]. Tea in Fujian, 2007, 29(4):6-8.(in Chinese) | |
| [25] |
XU J, HU F L, WANG W, et al. Investigation on biochemical compositional changes during the microbial fermentation process of Fu brick tea by LC-MS based metabolomics[J]. Food Chemistry, 2015, 186:176-184.
DOI URL |
| [26] |
SHARANGI A B. Medicinal and therapeutic potentialities of tea (Camellia sinensis L.): a review[J]. Food Research International, 2009, 42(5/6):529-535.
DOI URL |
| [27] | 梁敏敏, 曹冰冰, 杨亚, 等. 以碧香早品种夏茶鲜叶加工高香型黑毛茶工艺探讨[J]. 茶叶通讯, 2017, 44(1):19-23. |
| LIANG M M, CAO B B, YANG Y, et al. Study on the processing technology of high aroma dark tea from bixiangzao tea varieties summer tea leaves[J]. Journal of Tea Communication, 2017, 44(1):19-23.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [28] | 曾斌, 向阳, 梁敏敏, 等. 二次渥堆对安化黑毛茶品质形成的影响研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2015, 36(17):127-131, 141. |
| ZENG B, XIANG Y, LIANG M M, et al. Study on the second pile-fermentation on quality formation of Anhua dark green tea[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2015, 36(17):127-131, 141.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [29] | 辛嘉英. 食品生物化学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013. |
| [30] | 韩海华, 梁名志, 周斌星, 等. 普洱茶发酵过程中潮水用量对茶品质的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2011(9):112-114, 119. |
| HAN H H, LIANG M Z, ZHOU B X, et al. Influence of water content on quality of Pu-er tea during fermentation process[J]. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, 2011(9):112-114, 119.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | 易明, 孙宏, 沈琦, 汤江武. 异位发酵床技术在畜禽粪污处理中的研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1390-1396. |
| [2] | 陆南洋, 赵婷蕾, 周瑛, 姚燕来, 李鹏昊, 洪春来, 朱为静, 洪磊东, 张涛, 朱凤香. 蝇蛆转化赤霉素发酵滤渣的工艺研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(4): 901-908. |
| [3] | 乔慧茹, 房祥军, 吴伟杰, 刘瑞玲, 陈杭君, 邓尚贵, 沙浩, 郜海燕. 蓝莓与铁皮石斛叶复合乳酸菌发酵饮料工艺优化与品质分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(3): 654-666. |
| [4] | 夏思, 房祥军, 吴伟杰, 刘瑞玲, 陈慧芝, 牛犇, 郜海燕. 发酵型杨梅果浆的制备及其功能风味品质研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(3): 667-678. |
| [5] | 徐汇镔, 朱洁, 周朝生, 胡园, 陆荣茂. 基于响应面分析的养殖水产品中高风险喹诺酮类抗生素残留及其基质效应研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(3): 689-700. |
| [6] | 高强, 王丽丽, 张渐隆, 杨波, 李峰, 朱先志, 刘爱新, 韩超, 田雷. 高地芽孢杆菌CY1的分离鉴定及其对烟草黑胫病的防治作用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(2): 405-416. |
| [7] | 周毛措, 卢建雄, 郭晓农, 冯玉兰, 柴薇薇, 高鹏飞. 基于响应面法优化藜麦秸秆发酵工艺[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(9): 2020-2030. |
| [8] | 张妮, 陶文扬, 罗梦帆, 周万怡, 郑晓杰, 李彦坡, 金火喜, 杨颖. 酶解辅助提取对铁皮石斛多糖结构和菌群调节功能的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(9): 2099-2109. |
| [9] | 李淑艳, 焦婷, 齐帅, 张霞, 王虎宁, 赵生国. 体外法研究异绿原酸对绵羊日粮养分消化与瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(8): 1753-1763. |
| [10] | 刘雯雯, 胡连清, 周万海, 魏琴, 冯瑞章, 赵鑫, 车丽涛, 陈金玉. 饲粮中不同含量油樟叶对肉兔肠道pH、盲肠发酵和盲肠菌群的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(6): 1279-1289. |
| [11] | 张斌, 袁志辉, 彭陆军, 周向平, 周德英, 王锡春. 发酵稻壳通过增强氮代谢途径影响烟草幼苗的生长发育[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 237-246. |
| [12] | 张玥, 陈慧, 郑雅丹, 杨鹏, 柯志刚, 戴央章, 金友定, 丁玉庭, 刘书来. 贻贝糟制过程中的品质变化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 416-423. |
| [13] | 龚娜, 刘国丽, 陈珣, 马晓颖, 肇莹, 肖军. 一株野生肺形侧耳的鉴定及其液体发酵培养基的优化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(11): 2535-2545. |
| [14] | 何宇, 吕卫光, 李双喜, 郑宪清, 张翰林, 张娟琴, 张海韵, 白娜玲, 刘善良. γ-聚谷氨酸发酵液对小白菜生长及氮磷肥料利用率的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(2): 329-337. |
| [15] | 赵赛赛, 宁喜斌. 接种模仿葡萄球菌(Staphylococcus simulans)ZSJ6和添加芹菜粉对发酵香肠中亚硝酸盐及生物胺含量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(12): 2944-2953. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||