浙江省“农创客”在乡村发展中的带动效应及其影响路径

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.08.23

浙江农业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (8): 1796-1805.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.08.23

浙江省“农创客”在乡村发展中的带动效应及其影响路径

傅嘉艺¹(), 童磊¹, 苏飞¹, 郑珂¹, 厉海林², 曹轶蓉³^,^*(), 苏娜⁴

1.浙江工商大学旅游与城乡规划学院,浙江杭州 310018
2.浙江工商大学统计与数学学院,浙江杭州 310018
3.浙江工商大学杭州商学院管理学院,浙江桐庐 311599
4.浙江旅游职业学院旅游规划与设计学院,浙江杭州 311231

收稿日期:2021-10-11 出版日期:2022-08-25 发布日期:2022-08-26
通讯作者: 曹轶蓉
作者简介:*曹轶蓉,E-mail: yirongcao@126.com
傅嘉艺(2001—),女,浙江长兴人,本科生,主要从事城乡发展与规划研究。E-mail: fujiayi8296@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(42071159);国家自然科学基金(51908498);国家自然科学基金(41901202);教育部人文社会科学研究规划青年基金(21YJCZH005);国家级大学生创新创业训练计划(202110353027);浙江省新苗人才计划(2021R442005)

Driving effect and influence path of “agricultural makers” in rural development of Zhejiang Province, China

FU Jiayi¹(), TONG Lei¹, SU Fei¹, ZHENG Ke¹, LI Hailin², CAO Yirong³^,^*(), SU Na⁴

1. School of Tourism and Urban-Rural Planning, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
2. School of Statistics and Mathematics, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
3. School of Management, Zhejiang Gongshang University Hangzhou College of Commerce, Tonglu 311599, Zhejiang, China
4. School of Tourism Planning and Design, Tourism College of Zhejiang, Hangzhou 311231, China

Received:2021-10-11 Online:2022-08-25 Published:2022-08-26
Contact: CAO Yirong

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以浙江为案例区,在实地调研的基础上,通过因子分析等方法对浙江省“农创客”在乡村发展中的带动效应及其影响路径进行分析。结果表明:“农创客”在浙江省乡村发展中具有明显的带动作用,且主要集中在吸引投资、带动大学生回乡等方面。根据“农创客”在乡村发展中的带动模式,可以将“农创客”归纳为“创立品牌型”“创新技术型”“创汇组织型”“创业成长型”4种类型,各类型“农创客”对乡村发展的综合带动效应依次减弱。“农创客”在创新创业过程中通过改变金融资本、物质资本、社会资本、人力资本带动乡村发展,在带动过程中,上述4类资本的贡献度依次递减。金融资本、物质资本、社会资本和人力资本间存在着鲜明的路径依赖关系,其中,金融资本是基础,发挥核心作用,而人力资本是最为间接的要素。以精准提高“农创客”带动效应为目标,提出相应的优化建议和措施。

关键词: “农创客”, 带动效应, 影响路径, 乡村振兴, 浙江省

Abstract:

In the context of rural revitalization, Zhejiang Province, China was selected as the case area in the present study. Based on the filed survey, the driving effect and influence path of “agricultural makers” in rural development were explored via factorial analysis etc. It was shown that “agricultural makers” played obvious driving effect in rural development, and the effect was concentrated in the aspects of attracting investment and increasing the number of college students returning hometown. According to the driving mode in rural development, “agricultural makers” could be divided into 4 types, namely, “brand creation type” “innovative technology type” “innovative organization type” and “entrepreneurial growth type”, and the driving effect of the above 4 types decreased in sequence. “Agricultural makers” changed the financial capital, material capital, social capital and human capital in the process of innovation and entrepreneurship. During the rural development, the contribution of these four kinds of capitals decreased in sequence. There was a clear path dependence within financial capital, material capital, social capital and human capital. Among them, financial capital was the basis, and played a key role in rural development, while human capital was the most indirect one. Finally, corresponding optimization suggestions were proposed to accurately improve the driving effect of “agricultural makers” in rural development.

Key words: “agricultural makers”, driving effect, influence path, rural revitalization, Zhejiang Province

中图分类号:

F327

傅嘉艺, 童磊, 苏飞, 郑珂, 厉海林, 曹轶蓉, 苏娜. 浙江省“农创客”在乡村发展中的带动效应及其影响路径[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(8): 1796-1805.

FU Jiayi, TONG Lei, SU Fei, ZHENG Ke, LI Hailin, CAO Yirong, SU Na. Driving effect and influence path of “agricultural makers” in rural development of Zhejiang Province, China[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(8): 1796-1805.

图/表 7

参考文献 17

[1]	彭超, 段晋苑, 马彪. 新农人发展质量及其影响因素研究[J]. 宏观质量研究, 2021, 9(4): 15-27.
	PENG C, DUAN J Y, MA B. The quality of new farmers' development and its influencing factors[J]. Journal of Macro-Quality Research, 2021, 9(4): 15-27. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	TODO Y, TAKAHASHI R. Impact of farmer field schools on agricultural income and skills[J]. Journal of International Development, 2013, 25(3): 362-381. DOI URL
[3]	CALO A. How knowledge deficit interventions fail to resolve beginning farmer challenges[J]. Agriculture and Human Values, 2018, 35(2): 367-381. DOI URL
[4]	杜志雄. “新农人”引领中国农业转型的功能值得重视[J]. 世界农业, 2015(9): 248-250.
	DU Z X. The function of new rural entrepreneurial leading the transformation of China's agriculture is worthy of attention[J]. World Agriculture, 2015(9): 248-250. (in Chinese)
[5]	张慧泽, 高启杰. 新农人现象与乡村人才振兴机制构建: 基于社会与产业双重网络视角[J]. 现代经济探讨, 2021(2): 121-125.
	ZHANG H Z, GAO Q J. The phenomenon of new farmers and the construction of vitalizing mechanism of rural talents: based on the perspective of social and industrial dual network[J]. Modern Economic Research, 2021(2): 121-125. (in Chinese)
[6]	田书芹, 王东强. 乡村人才振兴的模式比较及其延伸: 基于整体性治理的多案例研究[J]. 当代经济管理, 2020, 42(8): 66-71.
	TIAN S Q, WANG D Q. Mode comparison of rural talent revitalization and its extension: multi cases study based on holistic governance[J]. Contemporary Economic Management, 2020, 42(8): 66-71. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	HAWLEY J D, PAEK J. Developing human resources for the technical workforce: a comparative study of Korea and Thailand[J]. International Journal of Training and Development, 2005, 9(1): 79-94. DOI URL
[8]	张磊. 浅谈人才在乡村振兴战略中的作用[J]. 农村农业农民(B版), 2018(10): 52.
	ZHANG L. Discussion on the role of talents in the strategy of rural revitalization[J]. Country Agriculture Farmers (B), 2018(10): 52. (in Chinese)
[9]	徐峻. 创客,改变农村的新力量[N]. 浙江日报, 2016-02-01(014).
[10]	程华东, 惠志丹. 农业高校助力解决乡村人力资本“短板”的新进路[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020(6): 112-119.
	CHENG H D, HUI Z D. A new approach to the short board of rural human capital with the aid of agricultural colleges and universities[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2020(6): 112-119. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	王洁琼, 孙泽厚. 新型农业创业人才三维资本、创业环境与创业企业绩效[J]. 中国农村经济, 2018(2): 81-94.
	WANG J Q, SUN Z H. The three-dimensional capital of new agricultural entrepreneurial talents, entrepreneurship environment and entrepreneurial performance[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018(2): 81-94. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	农业部农村经济体制与经营管理司课题组, 张红宇. 农业供给侧结构性改革背景下的新农人发展调查[J]. 中国农村经济, 2016(4): 2-11.
	Research Group of Department of Rural Economic System and Management, Ministry of Agriculture, ZHANG H Y. Investigation on the development of new rural entrepreneurial under the background of agricultural supply-side structural reform[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2016(4): 2-11. (in Chinese)
[13]	郑可, 王雨林, 卢毅, 等. 基于扎根理论的新农人创业认知特征识别[J]. 科学学研究, 2019, 37(12): 2222-2230.
	ZHENG K, WANG Y L, LU Y, et al. Recognition of new rural entrepreneurial cognitive characteristics based on grounded theory[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2019, 37(12): 2222-2230. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	吴懿. 互联网+背景下新农人创业影响因素研究: 基于威远县新农人创业的调研[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2016, 27(21): 207-209.
	WU Y. Research on the influencing factors of new rural entrepreneurial under the background of “internet plus campus”: based on the investigation of new rural entrepreneurial in Weiyuan County[J]. Rural Economy and Science-Technology, 2016, 27(21): 207-209. (in Chinese)
[15]	王国峰, 钱子玉, 尤亮. 服务乡村振兴的人才联合培养机制设计: 以山西财经大学乡村振兴学院为例[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2020, 42(S2): 74-75.
	WANG G F, QIAN Z Y, YOU L. Design for the talent joint training system for serving rural revitalization: setting the Faculty of Rural Revitalization in Shanxi University of Finance and Economics as an example[J]. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 2020, 42(S2): 74-75. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	谢艳华. “互联网+”背景下新农人成长的瓶颈及化解[J]. 农业经济, 2019(5): 51-52.
	XIE Y H. The bottleneck and resolution of the growth of new rural entrepreneurial under the background of “Internet Plus Campus”[J]. Agricultural Economy, 2019(5): 51-52. (in Chinese)
[17]	朱凡, 王印琪. 基于k-means与神经网络机器学习算法的用户信息聚类及预测研究[J]. 情报科学, 2021, 39(7): 83-90.
	ZHU F, WANG Y Q. Clustering and prediction of user information based on k-means and neural network machine learning algorithm[J]. Information Science, 2021, 39(7): 83-90. (in Chinese with English abstract)

一级指标 First level indicator	二级指标 Second level indicators	三级指标 Third level indicators	说明 Explanation
资本带动值 Capital driving value	X_M:物质资本 Material capital	X₁:农业机械种类增加度 Increase in agricultural machinery types	反映“农创客”对农业现代化的推动作用 Reflecting the promotion of “agricultural makers” in agricultural modernization
		X₂:基础设施完善优化度 Infrastructure perfection	反映“农创客”对乡村基础设施的推动作用 Reflecting the promotion of “agricultural makers” in rural infrastructure
		X₃:互联网应用水平提升度 Improvement of internet application level	反映“农创客”对乡村互联网发展的贡献 Reflecting the contribution of “agricultural makers” to rural internet development
	X_F:金融资本 Financial capital	X₄:创业吸引投资额 Investment amount attracted by entrepreneurship	反映“农创客”吸引的乡村资金投入 Reflecting the capital investment attracted by “agricultural makers”
		X₅:创业年销售额 Annual sales of entrepreneurship	反映“农创客”对乡村经济的贡献作用 Reflecting the contribution of “agricultural makers” to rural economy
		X₆:带动增收农民数量 Number of farmers with income increase	反映“农创客”对乡村劳动力的带动作用 Reflecting the driving effect of “agricultural makers” on rural labor force
		X₇:带动农民增收值 Increase of farmers' income	反映“农创客”对农民收入的带动作用 Reflecting the driving effect of “agricultural makers” on farmers' income
	X_H:人力资本 Human capital	X₈:开展农民生产技能培训人次 Number of trainings on farmers' production skills	反映“农创客”对乡村新技术发展的贡献 Reflecting the contribution of “agricultural makers” to the development of new technologies in rural areas
		X₉:带动回乡大学生数量 Number of college students returning home	反映“农创客”对乡村人才流入的促进作用 Reflecting the contribution of “agricultural makers” to the inflow of rural talent
	X_S:社会资本 Social capital	X₁₀:参与乡村发展决策建议频次 Participation frequency in rural development decisions and suggestions	反映“农创客”带动乡村治理文化优化的作用 Reflecting the role of “agricultural makers” in the optimization of rural governance culture
		X₁₁:集体经济组织增加数量 Increase in collective economic organizations quantity	反映“农创客”带动地区社会联系的作用 Reflecting the driving role of “agricultural makers” in regional social ties

一级指标 First level indicator	二级指标 Second level indicators	三级指标 Third level indicators	说明 Explanation
资本带动值 Capital driving value	X_M:物质资本 Material capital	X₁:农业机械种类增加度 Increase in agricultural machinery types	反映“农创客”对农业现代化的推动作用 Reflecting the promotion of “agricultural makers” in agricultural modernization
		X₂:基础设施完善优化度 Infrastructure perfection	反映“农创客”对乡村基础设施的推动作用 Reflecting the promotion of “agricultural makers” in rural infrastructure
		X₃:互联网应用水平提升度 Improvement of internet application level	反映“农创客”对乡村互联网发展的贡献 Reflecting the contribution of “agricultural makers” to rural internet development
	X_F:金融资本 Financial capital	X₄:创业吸引投资额 Investment amount attracted by entrepreneurship	反映“农创客”吸引的乡村资金投入 Reflecting the capital investment attracted by “agricultural makers”
		X₅:创业年销售额 Annual sales of entrepreneurship	反映“农创客”对乡村经济的贡献作用 Reflecting the contribution of “agricultural makers” to rural economy
		X₆:带动增收农民数量 Number of farmers with income increase	反映“农创客”对乡村劳动力的带动作用 Reflecting the driving effect of “agricultural makers” on rural labor force
		X₇:带动农民增收值 Increase of farmers' income	反映“农创客”对农民收入的带动作用 Reflecting the driving effect of “agricultural makers” on farmers' income
	X_H:人力资本 Human capital	X₈:开展农民生产技能培训人次 Number of trainings on farmers' production skills	反映“农创客”对乡村新技术发展的贡献 Reflecting the contribution of “agricultural makers” to the development of new technologies in rural areas
		X₉:带动回乡大学生数量 Number of college students returning home	反映“农创客”对乡村人才流入的促进作用 Reflecting the contribution of “agricultural makers” to the inflow of rural talent
	X_S:社会资本 Social capital	X₁₀:参与乡村发展决策建议频次 Participation frequency in rural development decisions and suggestions	反映“农创客”带动乡村治理文化优化的作用 Reflecting the role of “agricultural makers” in the optimization of rural governance culture
		X₁₁:集体经济组织增加数量 Increase in collective economic organizations quantity	反映“农创客”带动地区社会联系的作用 Reflecting the driving role of “agricultural makers” in regional social ties

聚类编号 Cluster No.	农业机械种类增加度 Increase in agricultural machinery types	创业吸引投资额 Investment amount attracted by entrepreneurship	带动回乡大学生数量 Number of college students returning home	集体经济组织增加数量 Increase in collective economic organizations quantity	互联网应用水平提升度 Improvement of internet application level
1	1.00	0.50	0.50	1.00	0.80
2	0	0.38	0.25	0	0.40
3	0.20	0.32	0.29	1.00	0.60
4	0.20	0.81	0.40	1.00	0.80

聚类编号 Cluster No.	农业机械种类增加度 Increase in agricultural machinery types	创业吸引投资额 Investment amount attracted by entrepreneurship	带动回乡大学生数量 Number of college students returning home	集体经济组织增加数量 Increase in collective economic organizations quantity	互联网应用水平提升度 Improvement of internet application level
1	1.00	0.50	0.50	1.00	0.80
2	0	0.38	0.25	0	0.40
3	0.20	0.32	0.29	1.00	0.60
4	0.20	0.81	0.40	1.00	0.80

类别 Category	金融资本 Financial capital	物质资本 Material capital	社会资本 Social capital	人力资本 Human capital	资本带动值 Capital driving value
创新技术型Innovative technology type	0.298 7	-0.303 1	2.759 7	-1.424 2	0.509 9
创业成长型Entrepreneurial growth type	-0.385 7	-2.235 5	-0.647 9	0.218 2	-0.796 5
创汇组织型Innovative organization type	-0.413 9	0.393 5	-0.224 2	-0.111 9	-0.148 4
创立品牌型Brand creation type	0.951 2	0.182 3	0.373 3	0.310 9	0.563 2

浙江省“农创客”在乡村发展中的带动效应及其影响路径

Driving effect and influence path of “agricultural makers” in rural development of Zhejiang Province, China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 17

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

路径 Path	估计值 Estimate	标准误差 Standard error
X_F→X_M	0.534^***	0.167
X_F→X_H	0.481^***	0.161
X_M→X_S	0.408^***	0.158
X_M→X₁	1	—
X_M→X₂	2.847^***	0.562
X_M→X₃	0.963^***	0.232
X_F→X₄	1.757^***	0.315
X_F→X₅	1.823^***	0.313
X_F→X₆	1	—
X_F→X₇	0.701^***	0.134
X_H→X₈	1.234^*	0.634
X_H→X₉	1	—
X_S→X₁₀	1	—
X_S→X₁₁	3.741***	1.292

[1]	夏龙. 农村金融助力乡村振兴——机制分析与效率评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(7): 1558-1570.
[2]	郭亮玺, 胡豹. 浙江省政策性农业保险机制创新回顾与改革对策研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(5): 1081-1090.
[3]	王丽娟, 陈秧分, 徐梦洁. 乡村振兴视域下农业跨区域投资区位及其决策机制——以浙江省为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(4): 841-850.
[4]	顾兴国, 闵庆文, 王英, 王斌. 浙江省农业文化遗产保护进展、问题与对策[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(2): 397-408.
[5]	傅琳琳, 毛晓红, 毛小报, 蔡日旋. 浙江省2013—2018年粮食综合生产能力评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(9): 1748-1758.
[6]	叶晗, 吴博文, 许红卫, 干牧野, 张晶, 王珂. 基于地理大数据的省域休闲农业空间格局及其影响因素研究——以浙江省为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(7): 1264-1274.
[7]	苗苗, 迮寒露, 吴永华. 浙江省耕地利用转型时空演变特征分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(4): 753-760.
[8]	孟幼青, 汪恩国, 陈吴健, 李艳敏, 程帆, 孟敏霞. 浙江省亚洲柑橘木虱黄龙病病原分布与消长规律[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(3): 464-469.
[9]	魏玲玲, 童再康, 罗黎敏, 沈希. 从乡村振兴视角谈科技特派员制度创新——以浙江省为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(7): 1311-1316.
[10]	俞滨, 汪卫芳. 优化股权结构,赋能技术创新——基于浙江农业龙头企业面板数据的实证研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(5): 931-940.
[11]	傅琳琳, 毛小报, 毛晓红, 李海涛, 王瑾. 浙江农业可持续发展水平与区域差异综合评价——基于高质量发展视角[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(10): 1880-1889.
[12]	何兰, 周国华. 基于耗散结构理论的田园综合体发展分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(8): 1388-1398.
[13]	胡豹, 谢小梅. 高质量推进乡村振兴的浙江典型模式与路径创新[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(3): 496-502.
[14]	任维, 张雪葳, 李房英, 董建文. 基于景观破碎度分析的温州三垟湿地乡土景观保护研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(11): 1841-1854.
[15]	汪玉磊, 汪洁, 单英杰, 朱有为. 基于耕地因素分解的浙江省粮食生产变化研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(10): 1605-1610.