浙江农业学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (12): 2602-2614.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20241114
甘裕萍1(
), 巩卫琪2, 周晨阳1, 李春田3, 王俊文1, 刘晨星1, 夏其乐1, 陆胜民1,*(
)
收稿日期:2024-12-22
出版日期:2025-12-25
发布日期:2026-01-09
作者简介:甘裕萍(2001—),女,广西岑溪人,硕士研究生,研究方向为果品加工质量与安全。E-mail: 18278006725@163.com
通讯作者:
*陆胜民,E-mail: 1010508971@qq.com
基金资助:
GAN Yuping1(
), GONG Weiqi2, ZHOU Chenyang1, LI Chuntian3, WANG Junwen1, LIU Chenxing1, XIA Qile1, LU Shengmin1,*(
)
Received:2024-12-22
Online:2025-12-25
Published:2026-01-09
摘要: 为解决梨果泥加工中的酶促褐变问题,并开发一款风味独特的梨-石斛复合果泥,本研究优化了梨果泥的护色剂配方,并筛选了最适合该复合果泥的杀菌方式,以保障其在贮藏期间的品质。首先,以褐变指数为评价指标,通过单因素与正交试验确定梨果泥的最佳护色剂配方。然后,以优化后的梨果泥与石斛汁为原料制备复合果泥,分别采用巴氏杀菌、微波杀菌和高温蒸汽杀菌进行处理,比较其在4 ℃条件下贮藏10 d内的理化指标、微生物指标、挥发性成分及感官品质的变化。结果表明,最佳护色剂配方为:柠檬酸质量分数0.6%、抗坏血酸质量分数0.04%、氯化钠质量分数0.6%。杀菌方式比较显示:3种杀菌方式处理的梨-石斛复合果泥的可溶性固形物含量无显著差异(p>0.05),但色泽(L*、a*、b*值)、菌落总数与主要营养成分含量差异显著(p<0.05)。其中,高温蒸汽杀菌处理的复合果泥在a*值、b*值、总酚含量、总糖含量和挥发性成分总量上均显著高于其他两组,且感官评分最高。在4 ℃贮藏过程中,3种杀菌处理的梨-石斛复合果泥的可溶性固形物含量、pH值、总酚含量和总糖含量均呈下降趋势,但高温蒸汽杀菌组的下降幅度最小,品质最为稳定。综上,高温蒸汽杀菌能较好地保持梨-石斛复合果泥的色泽、营养成分和风味,延缓贮藏期间的品质劣变,可作为该产品首选的加工与保鲜技术。
中图分类号:
甘裕萍, 巩卫琪, 周晨阳, 李春田, 王俊文, 刘晨星, 夏其乐, 陆胜民. 梨-石斛复合果泥的护色工艺优化与杀菌方式对其贮藏品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(12): 2602-2614.
GAN Yuping, GONG Weiqi, ZHOU Chenyang, LI Chuntian, WANG Junwen, LIU Chenxing, XIA Qile, LU Shengmin. Optimization of the color protection process for pear-Dendrobium compound puree and the influence of sterilization methods on its storage quality[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(12): 2602-2614.
| 水平 Level | 因素Factor | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| (A)柠檬酸 质量分数 Citric acid mass fraction | (B)抗坏血酸 质量分数 Ascorbic acid mass fraction | (C)氯化钠 质量分数 Sodium chloride mass fraction | |
| 1 | 0.6 | 0.02 | 0.6 |
| 2 | 0.8 | 0.04 | 0.9 |
| 3 | 1.0 | 0.06 | 1.2 |
表1 正交试验设计
Table 1 Orthogonal experimental design %
| 水平 Level | 因素Factor | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| (A)柠檬酸 质量分数 Citric acid mass fraction | (B)抗坏血酸 质量分数 Ascorbic acid mass fraction | (C)氯化钠 质量分数 Sodium chloride mass fraction | |
| 1 | 0.6 | 0.02 | 0.6 |
| 2 | 0.8 | 0.04 | 0.9 |
| 3 | 1.0 | 0.06 | 1.2 |
| 项目 Item | 评价标准 Evaluation criteria | 分值 Score |
|---|---|---|
| 色泽(25分) | 颜色暗淡,呈淡粉红色,无光泽The color is dull, pale pink, and matte | 1~7 |
| Color (25 points) | 有光泽,呈粉红色Glossy and pink | 8~15 |
| 颜色呈光亮的粉红色The color is a bright pink | 16~25 | |
| 酸甜度(25分) | 过酸或者过甜Too sour or too sweet | 1~7 |
| Sweetness and sourness (25 points) | 酸味或者甜味清淡The taste is light and sour or sweet | 8~15 |
| 酸味中带甜,口感适宜The sour taste is sweet and sour, and the taste is suitable | 16~25 | |
| 组织状态(25分) | 果泥有可见颗粒,组织不均匀The puree has visible particles and uneven tissue | 1~7 |
| Tissue status (25 points) | 果泥细腻,组织稍不均匀The puree is delicate and the tissue is slightly uneven | 8~15 |
| 果泥细腻,组织均匀The puree is delicate and evenly organized | 16~25 | |
| 香气(25分) | 没有梨果香味No pear fruit scent | 1~7 |
| Aroma (25 points) | 有淡淡梨果香味,无其他香味It has a faint pear fruit fragrance and no other fragrance | 8~15 |
| 有清新的混合水果香气There is a fresh aroma of mixed fruits | 16~25 |
表2 感官评定标准
Table 2 Sensory evaluation criteria
| 项目 Item | 评价标准 Evaluation criteria | 分值 Score |
|---|---|---|
| 色泽(25分) | 颜色暗淡,呈淡粉红色,无光泽The color is dull, pale pink, and matte | 1~7 |
| Color (25 points) | 有光泽,呈粉红色Glossy and pink | 8~15 |
| 颜色呈光亮的粉红色The color is a bright pink | 16~25 | |
| 酸甜度(25分) | 过酸或者过甜Too sour or too sweet | 1~7 |
| Sweetness and sourness (25 points) | 酸味或者甜味清淡The taste is light and sour or sweet | 8~15 |
| 酸味中带甜,口感适宜The sour taste is sweet and sour, and the taste is suitable | 16~25 | |
| 组织状态(25分) | 果泥有可见颗粒,组织不均匀The puree has visible particles and uneven tissue | 1~7 |
| Tissue status (25 points) | 果泥细腻,组织稍不均匀The puree is delicate and the tissue is slightly uneven | 8~15 |
| 果泥细腻,组织均匀The puree is delicate and evenly organized | 16~25 | |
| 香气(25分) | 没有梨果香味No pear fruit scent | 1~7 |
| Aroma (25 points) | 有淡淡梨果香味,无其他香味It has a faint pear fruit fragrance and no other fragrance | 8~15 |
| 有清新的混合水果香气There is a fresh aroma of mixed fruits | 16~25 |
图1 各抑制剂对梨果泥褐变影响的单因素试验结果 柱上无相同小写字母表示差异显著(p<0.05)。下同。
Fig.1 Results of single factor test of inhibitor on browning of pear puree Bars marked without the same lowercase letter indicated significant differences at p<0.05.The same as below.
| 实验号 Experiment number | A/% | B/% | C/% | 吸光度 Absorbance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.079 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0.084 |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0.095 |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0.105 |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0.099 |
| 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0.112 |
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0.110 |
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0.106 |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0.125 |
表3 正交试验结果
Table 3 Result of orthogonal experiment
| 实验号 Experiment number | A/% | B/% | C/% | 吸光度 Absorbance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.079 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0.084 |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0.095 |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0.105 |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0.099 |
| 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0.112 |
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0.110 |
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0.106 |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0.125 |
| 因素 Factor | k1 | k2 | k3 | R | 最优水平 Optimal level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 0.086 | 0.105 | 0.114 | 0.028 | 1 |
| B | 0.098 | 0.096 | 0.111 | 0.014 | 2 |
| C | 0.099 | 0.105 | 0.101 | 0.006 | 1 |
表4 极差分析结果
Table 4 Result of range analysis
| 因素 Factor | k1 | k2 | k3 | R | 最优水平 Optimal level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 0.086 | 0.105 | 0.114 | 0.028 | 1 |
| B | 0.098 | 0.096 | 0.111 | 0.014 | 2 |
| C | 0.099 | 0.105 | 0.101 | 0.006 | 1 |
| 处理条件 Processing conditions | 时间 Time/d | L* | a* | b* | ΔE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照Control | 0 | 30.21±0.01 Cl | 15.98±0.01 Bn | 29.37±0.01 Bk | 0 |
| 巴氏杀菌Pasteurization | 0 | 30.02±0.01 Dn | 15.89±0.01 Co | 29.39±0.04 Bk | 0.21 |
| 2 | 30.31±0.01 k | 16.00±0.03 n | 29.40±0.06 k | 0.11 | |
| 4 | 31.52±0.01 e | 16.49±0.01 h | 30.30±0.03 h | 1.69 | |
| 6 | 31.83±0.05 b | 16.48±0.08 hi | 30.41±0.11 fg | 1.99 | |
| 8 | 31.96±0.02 a | 16.35±0.00 l | 30.05±0.03 j | 1.91 | |
| 10 | 31.04±0.02 h | 16.54±0.02 g | 30.19±0.03 i | 1.29 | |
| 微波杀菌 | 0 | 30.68±0.01 Bj | 15.91±0.01 Co | 29.39±0.01 Bk | 0.48 |
| Microwave sterilization | 2 | 30.12±0.01 m | 16.11±0.01 m | 29.36±0.02 k | 0.16 |
| 4 | 31.59±0.01 d | 16.39±0.01 k | 30.33±0.06 gh | 1.73 | |
| 6 | 31.45±0.01 f | 16.56±0.01 g | 30.52±0.04 e | 1.79 | |
| 8 | 31.63±0.01 c | 16.43±0.01 j | 30.13±0.02 ij | 1.67 | |
| 10 | 31.36±0.03 g | 16.45±0.01 ij | 30.20±0.11 i | 1.49 | |
| 高温蒸汽杀菌 | 0 | 31.97±0.01 Aa | 20.50±0.02 Af | 32.07±0.07 Ab | 5.55 |
| High-temperature | 2 | 29.12±0.01 q | 21.94±0.01 a | 30.47±0.03 ef | 6.16 |
| steam sterilization | 4 | 31.37±0.01 g | 21.22±0.01 d | 32.18±0.02 a | 6.06 |
| 6 | 30.94±0.01 i | 21.25±0.00 c | 31.86±0.09 c | 6.05 | |
| 8 | 29.88±0.01 o | 21.33±0.01 b | 30.76±0.03 d | 5.54 | |
| 10 | 29.84±0.02 p | 20.95±0.01 e | 30.42±0.05 fg | 5.09 |
表5 不同杀菌处理的梨-石斛复合果泥在贮藏期间的色泽变化
Table 5 Color difference changes of pear-Dendrobium compound puree under different sterilization treatments during storage
| 处理条件 Processing conditions | 时间 Time/d | L* | a* | b* | ΔE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照Control | 0 | 30.21±0.01 Cl | 15.98±0.01 Bn | 29.37±0.01 Bk | 0 |
| 巴氏杀菌Pasteurization | 0 | 30.02±0.01 Dn | 15.89±0.01 Co | 29.39±0.04 Bk | 0.21 |
| 2 | 30.31±0.01 k | 16.00±0.03 n | 29.40±0.06 k | 0.11 | |
| 4 | 31.52±0.01 e | 16.49±0.01 h | 30.30±0.03 h | 1.69 | |
| 6 | 31.83±0.05 b | 16.48±0.08 hi | 30.41±0.11 fg | 1.99 | |
| 8 | 31.96±0.02 a | 16.35±0.00 l | 30.05±0.03 j | 1.91 | |
| 10 | 31.04±0.02 h | 16.54±0.02 g | 30.19±0.03 i | 1.29 | |
| 微波杀菌 | 0 | 30.68±0.01 Bj | 15.91±0.01 Co | 29.39±0.01 Bk | 0.48 |
| Microwave sterilization | 2 | 30.12±0.01 m | 16.11±0.01 m | 29.36±0.02 k | 0.16 |
| 4 | 31.59±0.01 d | 16.39±0.01 k | 30.33±0.06 gh | 1.73 | |
| 6 | 31.45±0.01 f | 16.56±0.01 g | 30.52±0.04 e | 1.79 | |
| 8 | 31.63±0.01 c | 16.43±0.01 j | 30.13±0.02 ij | 1.67 | |
| 10 | 31.36±0.03 g | 16.45±0.01 ij | 30.20±0.11 i | 1.49 | |
| 高温蒸汽杀菌 | 0 | 31.97±0.01 Aa | 20.50±0.02 Af | 32.07±0.07 Ab | 5.55 |
| High-temperature | 2 | 29.12±0.01 q | 21.94±0.01 a | 30.47±0.03 ef | 6.16 |
| steam sterilization | 4 | 31.37±0.01 g | 21.22±0.01 d | 32.18±0.02 a | 6.06 |
| 6 | 30.94±0.01 i | 21.25±0.00 c | 31.86±0.09 c | 6.05 | |
| 8 | 29.88±0.01 o | 21.33±0.01 b | 30.76±0.03 d | 5.54 | |
| 10 | 29.84±0.02 p | 20.95±0.01 e | 30.42±0.05 fg | 5.09 |
图2 不同杀菌处理的梨-石斛复合果泥在贮藏期间的可溶性固形物含量(A)和pH值(B) 柱上无相同大写字母表示未杀菌与3种杀菌处理样品在贮藏初始时间(0 d)存在显著差异(p<0.05);柱上无相同小写字母表示3种杀菌处理样品不同贮藏时间存在显著差异(p<0.05)。下同。
Fig.2 Total soluble solid content (A) and pH value (B) of pear-Dendrobium compound puree treated with different sterilization treatments during storage Bars marked without the same uppercase letters of each column indicated significant (p<0.05) difference between the unsterilized and the three sterilized samples at the initial storage time (0 d), and bars marked without the same lowercase letters of each column indicated significant difference among the three sterilized samples at different storage times. The same as below.
图3 不同杀菌处理的梨-石斛复合果泥在贮藏期间的总酚(A)和总糖含量(B)
Fig.3 Total phenol content (A) and total sugar content (B) of pear-Dendrobium compound puree treated with different sterilization treatments during storage
图4 不同杀菌处理的梨-石斛复合果泥的风味 (A)主成分分析;(B)传感器雷达图。W1C,芳烃化合物;W5S,氮氧化合物;W3C,氨和芳香分子;W6S,氢化物;W5C,烯烃、芳香族和极性分子;W1S,烷类;W1W,硫化合物;W2S,醇类和部分芳香族化合物;W2W,芳烃化合物和含硫有机化合物;W3S,烷类和脂肪族。
Fig.4 Flavor of pear-Dendrobium compound puree under different sterilization treatments (A) Principal component analysis; (B) Sensor radar map. W1C, Aromatic compounds; W5S, Nitrogen oxides; W3C, Ammonia and aromatic molecules; W6S, Hydrides; W5C, Alkenes, aromatic and polar molecules; W1S, Alkanes; W1W, Sulfur compounds; W2S, Alcohols and some aromatic compounds; W2W, Aromatic compounds and sulfur-containing organic compounds; W3S, Alkanes and aliphatic compounds.
| 处理条件 Processing condition | 时间 Time/d | 菌落总数 Total number of colonies/(CFU·g-1) |
|---|---|---|
| 未处理Not processed | 0 | 13.33±5.78 bc |
| 巴氏杀菌 | 0 | ND |
| Pasteurization | 2 | ND |
| 4 | ND | |
| 6 | 6.67±11.55 cd | |
| 8 | 16.67±5.78 b | |
| 10 | 26.67±5.78 a | |
| 微波杀菌 | 0 | ND |
| Microwave sterilization | 2 | ND |
| 4 | 3.33±5.78 d | |
| 6 | 6.67±5.78 cd | |
| 8 | 13.33±11.55 bc | |
| 10 | 16.67±5.78 b | |
| 高温蒸汽杀菌 | 0 | ND |
| High-temperature | 2 | ND |
| steam sterilization | 4 | ND |
| 6 | ND | |
| 8 | ND | |
| 10 | ND |
表6 不同杀菌处理后梨-石斛复合果泥在贮藏期间的菌落总数
Table 6 Total number of bacterial colonies of pear-Dendrobium compound puree after different sterilization treatments during storage
| 处理条件 Processing condition | 时间 Time/d | 菌落总数 Total number of colonies/(CFU·g-1) |
|---|---|---|
| 未处理Not processed | 0 | 13.33±5.78 bc |
| 巴氏杀菌 | 0 | ND |
| Pasteurization | 2 | ND |
| 4 | ND | |
| 6 | 6.67±11.55 cd | |
| 8 | 16.67±5.78 b | |
| 10 | 26.67±5.78 a | |
| 微波杀菌 | 0 | ND |
| Microwave sterilization | 2 | ND |
| 4 | 3.33±5.78 d | |
| 6 | 6.67±5.78 cd | |
| 8 | 13.33±11.55 bc | |
| 10 | 16.67±5.78 b | |
| 高温蒸汽杀菌 | 0 | ND |
| High-temperature | 2 | ND |
| steam sterilization | 4 | ND |
| 6 | ND | |
| 8 | ND | |
| 10 | ND |
| [1] | 墨菲. 致力深耕中国婴幼儿辅食市场嘉宝有机果泥正式国产上市[J]. 中国食品, 2021(10): 156. |
| MO F. Committed to deepening the baby food supplement market in China, Jiabao organic puree was officially listed in China[J]. China Food, 2021(10): 156. (in Chinese) | |
| [2] | 李慧芸, 张宝善. 果汁非酶褐变的机制及控制措施[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2005, 26(6): 145-147. |
| LI H Y, ZHANG B S. Nonenzymatic browning mechanism and controlling measurements of fruit juice[J]. Food Research and Development, 2005, 26(6): 145-147. (in Chinese) | |
| [3] | 王娟, 王然, 王佳, 等. 七种日韩梨果泥贮藏稳定性研究[J]. 食品科学, 2011, 32(16): 357-360. |
| WANG J, WANG R, WANG J, et al. Stability of seven kinds of Japanese and Korean pear purees during storage[J]. Food Science, 2011, 32(16): 357-360. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [4] | 刘红锦, 徐为民, 王静, 等. 果蔬的褐变及其控制方法[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2008, 29(4): 159-162. |
| LIU H J, XU W M, WANG J, et al. Browning mechanism and inhibition of fruits and vegetables[J]. Food Research and Development, 2008, 29(4): 159-162. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [5] | 葛可佑. 中国营养科学全书[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2004: 255-257. |
| [6] | 潘叙恩, 周秀清, 蒋志红, 等. 雪梨枇杷低糖果酱的研制[J]. 现代食品科技, 2011, 27(6): 695-697. |
| PAN X E, ZHOU X Q, JIANG Z H, et al. Preparation of low sugar jam using loquat fruit and pear[J]. Modern Food Science and Technology, 2011, 27(6): 695-697. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [7] | 王文辉, 贾晓辉, 杜艳民, 等. 我国梨果生产与贮藏现状、存在的问题与发展趋势[J]. 保鲜与加工, 2013, 13(5): 1-8. |
| WANG W H, JIA X H, DU Y M, et al. Current situation, problems and development trend of production and storage of pear in China[J]. Storage and Process, 2013, 13(5): 1-8. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [8] | 何近刚, 冯云霄, 李丽梅, 等. ‘黄冠’梨果实采收和贮藏品质评价体系的建立[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2019, 42(4): 35-43. |
| HE J G, FENG Y X, LI L M, et al. Establishment of evaluation system for fruit quality and storage quality of ‘Huangguan’ pear[J]. Journal of Agricultural University of Hebei, 2019, 42(4): 35-43. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [9] | 李玲, 邓晓兰, 赵兴兵, 等. 铁皮石斛化学成分及药理作用研究进展[J]. 肿瘤药学, 2011, 1(2): 90-94. |
| LI L, DENG X L, ZHAO X B, et al. Advances in studies on chemical constituents in Dendrobium candidum and their pharmacological effects[J]. Anti-tumor Pharmacy, 2011, 1(2): 90-94. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [10] | 蓝希明, 赵益, 王高玉, 等. 铁皮石斛抗肿瘤作用机制的研究进展与思考[J]. 江西中医药, 2017, 48(4): 68-70. |
| LAN X M, ZHAO Y, WANG G Y, et al. Research progress and thinking on anti-tumor mechanism of Dendrobium candidum[J]. Jiangxi Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2017, 48(4): 68-70. (in Chinese) | |
| [11] | KIM S, JO K, BYUN B S, et al. Chemical and biological properties of puffed Dendrobium officinale extracts: evaluation of antioxidant and anti-fatigue activities[J]. Journal of Functional Foods, 2020, 73: 104144. |
| [12] | WEI W, LI Z P, ZHU T, et al. Anti-fatigue effects of the unique polysaccharide marker of Dendrobium officinale on BALB/c mice[J]. Molecules, 2017, 22(1): 155. |
| [13] | 王再花, 叶广英, 曾灿彪, 等. 铁皮石斛饮料杀菌工艺研制及品质分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(16): 124-130. |
| WANG Z H, YE G Y, ZENG C B, et al. Dendrobium officinale beverage: sterilization process and quality analysis[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(16): 124-130. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [14] | DO NASCIMENTO R F, CANTERI M H G, RODRIGUES S Á, et al. Use of sodium metabisulphite and ascorbic acid to control browning in ready-to-eat processed potatoes during prolonged storage[J]. Potato Research, 2020, 63(4): 615-625. |
| [15] | ZHOU L, LIU W, STOCKMANN R, et al. Effect of citric acid and high pressure thermal processing on enzyme activity and related quality attributes of pear puree[J]. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 2018, 45: 196-207. |
| [16] | 王颖, 杜易潼, 薛婉玉, 等. 植物源性天然抗氧化剂的机理及其在食品保鲜中的应用[J]. 中国调味品, 2023, 48(1): 204-209. |
| WANG Y, DU Y T, XUE W Y, et al. Mechanism of natural plant-derived antioxidants and their application in food preservation[J]. China Condiment, 2023, 48(1): 204-209. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [17] | 赵鹏广, 刘伟, 尚俊杰, 等. 护色与浓缩工艺对梨膏品质的影响[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2019, 40(13): 138-144. |
| ZHAO P G, LIU W, SHANG J J, et al. Effect of color protection and concentration process on the quality of pear paste[J]. Food Research and Development, 2019, 40(13): 138-144. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [18] | 吴胤霆, 王洋, 张楠, 等. 火龙果南酸枣复合果泥配方优化及香气分析[J]. 中国调味品, 2023, 48(12): 159-165. |
| WU Y T, WANG Y, ZHANG N, et al. Formula optimization and aroma analysis of compound puree of pitaya and Choerospondias axillaris[J]. China Condiment, 2023, 48(12): 159-165. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [19] | 胡晓云, 甘蓓, 徐昕洁, 等. 有机婴幼儿果蔬泥护色工艺的研究[J]. 江西农业学报, 2016, 28(4): 39-42. |
| HU X Y, GAN B, XU X J, et al. Study on color protection process of organic fruit and vegetable paste for infants[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2016, 28(4): 39-42. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [20] | 邓汶欣, 王洋, 刘秋辰, 等. 温度和抑制剂改善雪梨南酸枣复合果泥储藏期褐变[J]. 中国食品添加剂, 2022, 33(10): 8-17. |
| DENG W X, WANG Y, LIU Q C, et al. Temperature and inhibitor improve browning of snow pear Choerospondias axillaris blend fruit puree during storage[J]. China Food Additives, 2022, 33(10): 8-17. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [21] | 杨瑾越, 赵静, 秦梦薇, 等. 养胃养颜石斛西梅果冻的加工工艺研究[J]. 安徽化工, 2024, 50(3): 60-63. |
| YANG J Y, ZHAO J, QIN M W, et al. Study on the processing technology of Dendrobium sagojelly for nourishing stomach and nourishing beauty[J]. Anhui Chemical Industry, 2024, 50(3): 60-63. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [22] | 肖川泉, 张楠, 罗小丹, 等. 南酸枣复合果泥配方与护色工艺的优化研究[J]. 中国调味品, 2024, 49(1): 25-32. |
| XIAO C Q, ZHANG N, LUO X D, et al. Study on optimization of formula and color protection process of Choerospondias axillaris compound puree[J]. China Condiment, 2024, 49(1): 25-32. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [23] | 宋菲红, 蒋玉梅, 盛文军, 等. 苹果沙棘复合果泥配方优化及品质分析[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(6): 184-194. |
| SONG F H, JIANG Y M, SHENG W J, et al. Formula optimization and aroma composition analysis of apple sea-buckthorn complex puree[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2021, 47(6): 184-194. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [24] | 唐征, 肖逸, 杜长江, 等. 不同杀菌方式对百香果汁有机物含量、色泽和褐变系数的影响分析[J]. 食品安全导刊, 2024(18): 60-62. |
| TANG Z, XIAO Y, DU C J, et al. Effect of different sterilization methods on organic content, color and browning coefficient of passion fruit juice[J]. China Food Safety Magazine, 2024(18): 60-62. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [25] | 何翊辰, 林欣瑜, 齐高博, 等. 南瓜香蕉果糕制备工艺及不同杀菌方式影响[J]. 农产品加工, 2019(19): 22-24. |
| HE Y C, LIN X Y, QI G B, et al. Effects of preparation and sterilization of pumpkin banana cake[J]. Farm Products Processing, 2019(19): 22-24. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [26] | YOU Y L, LI N, HAN X, et al. Influence of different sterilization treatments on the color and anthocyanin contents of mulberry juice during refrigerated storage[J]. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 2018, 48: 1-10. |
| [27] | 肖阳, 曹雁平, 薛卫星, 等. 低糖香蕉酱的研制[J]. 食品工业科技, 2000, 21(2): 56-57. |
| XIAO Y, CAO Y P, XUE W X, et al. Development of the low sugar banana jam[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2000, 21(2): 56-57. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [28] | CHEN R H, YU M, JIANG B, et al. Effect of different sterilization methods on the appearance, composition, and flavor of sugarcane juice[J]. Journal of Food Science, 2024, 89(3): 1755-1772. |
| [29] | 曹建康, 姜微波, 赵玉梅. 果蔬采后生理生化实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国轻工业出版社, 2007. |
| [30] | 冯若怡, 王晓钰, 杨云舒, 等. 超高压处理对复合苹果泥微生物和品质的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2020, 41(17): 37-44. |
| FENG R Y, WANG X Y, YANG Y S, et al. Effects of high hydrostatic pressure treatment on microbe and quality of mixed apple puree[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2020, 41(17): 37-44. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [31] | 柳青, 赵晓燕, 张超, 等. 超高压处理对草莓汁贮藏期微生物及品质的影响[J]. 中国食品学报, 2014, 14(11): 111-117. |
| LIU Q, ZHAO X Y, ZHANG C, et al. Effect of high hydrostatic pressure processing on microorganism and qualities of strawberry juice during storage[J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2014, 14(11): 111-117. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [32] | 郭雷, 吕明生, 王淑军, 等. 苯酚-硫酸法测定樱桃酒中总糖[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2010, 31(6): 130-132. |
| GUO L, LU M S, WANG S J, et al. Determination of total sugar from cherry wine by phenol-sulfuric acid method[J]. Food Research and Development, 2010, 31(6): 130-132. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [33] | 陈其钢, 王向未. 山药、山楂、蓝莓复合蔬菜泥的开发研究[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2014, 35(22): 17-20. |
| CHEN Q G, WANG X W. The research of compound in yam, hawthorn, blueberry vegetable puree[J]. Food Research and Development, 2014, 35(22): 17-20. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [34] | FRANCIS F J, CLYDESDALE F M. Food colorimetry: theory and applications[M]. Connecticut: The Avi Publishing Company, Inc., 1975. |
| [35] | 梁凤玲. 矮箕青菜贮期品质变化规律及保鲜技术研究[D]. 合肥: 合肥工业大学, 2012. |
| LIANG F L. Study on change rules of quality and preservation techniques of Bok choy during storage[D]. Hefei: Hefei University of Technology, 2012. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [36] | 冀晓龙, 王敏, 田汉英, 等. 不同杀菌方式对梨枣汁贮藏过程中品质变化的影响[J]. 现代食品科技, 2013, 29(9): 2211-2217. |
| JI X L, WANG M, TIAN H Y, et al. Effect of different sterilization methods on quality of pear jujube juice during storage[J]. Modern Food Science and Technology, 2013, 29(9): 2211-2217. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [37] | 余秀丽, 施瑞城. 微波处理对芒果原浆杀菌效果和品质的影响研究[J]. 热带作物学报, 2017, 38(3): 572-579. |
| YU X L, SHI R C. Effect of microwave treatment on the sterilization effect and quality of mango puree[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2017, 38(3): 572-579. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [38] | 冯伦元. 食品微生物在食品保鲜中的应用及其作用机制研究[J]. 中国食品, 2024(22): 135-137. |
| FENG L Y. Application of food microorganism in food preservation and its mechanism[J]. China Food, 2024(22): 135-137. (in Chinese) | |
| [39] | 熊海燕, 李莹. 不同果汁发酵液中酵母菌生长曲线的测定及pH值的变化[J]. 农产品加工(学刊), 2009(4): 26-27. |
| XIONG H Y, LI Y. Measurement of yeast growth curve and pH values in different fermented fruit juices[J]. Academic Periodical of Farm Products Processing, 2009(4): 26-27. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [40] | 林鑫勰, 余岳芳, 朱玉燕, 等. 不同热杀菌处理的NFC橙汁品质变化分析[J]. 保鲜与加工, 2022, 22(8): 51-58. |
| LIN X X, YU Y F, ZHU Y Y, et al. Quality changes in NFC orange juice treated with different thermal sterilization[J]. Storage and Process, 2022, 22(8): 51-58. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [41] | 卫萍, 游向荣, 张雅媛, 等. 不同杀菌方式对低糖香蕉果酱品质的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2015, 36(7): 97-100. |
| WEI P, YOU X R, ZHANG Y Y, et al. Effect of different sterilization ways on quality of low-sugar banana jam[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2015, 36(7): 97-100. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [42] | 杨晓娜, 徐玲, 赵昶灵, 等. 龙陵紫皮石斛花色苷色素抑菌作用初探[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2015, 15(14): 139-143. |
| YANG X N, XU L, ZHAO C L, et al. Study on inhibitory effect of anthocyanin from Dendrobium devonianum in Longling[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2015, 15(14): 139-143. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [43] | 刘春兰, 杨逸, 何林, 等. 植物多糖抑菌作用研究方法进展[J]. 时珍国医国药, 2013, 24(7): 1725-1727. |
| LIU C L, YANG Y, HE L, et al. Advance of research methods of polysaccharide in bacteriostatic effect[J]. Lishizhen Medicine and Materia Medica Research, 2013, 24(7): 1725-1727. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [44] | 牛慧慧, 张慧云, 邹文惠, 等. 不同杀菌方式对百香果汁感官和营养品质的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2022, 48(20): 145-151. |
| NIU H H, ZHANG H Y, ZOU W H, et al. Effects of sterilization methods on the sensory related characteristics and nutritional quality of passion fruit juice[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2022, 48(20): 145-151. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | 杨贵仁, 穆宏磊, 吴伟杰, 房祥军, 陈慧芝, 牛犇, 陈杭君, 郜海燕. 酪蛋白对杨梅汁中花色苷的工艺优化及保持研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(1): 178-188. |
| [2] | 宗自豪, 何丁生, 牛犇, 黄俊, 房祥军, 吴伟杰, 陈杭君, 郜海燕. 不同镂空包装对雨天采收杨梅贮运品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(1): 196-204. |
| [3] | 王诗瑶, 辛镇忠, 王连, 王愈. beta@壳聚糖保鲜涂层的制备及其对太谷梨枣品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(9): 2212-2221. |
| [4] | 清源, 方志荣, 姚昕, 尹胜. 不同贮藏温度下印度块菌净菜品质变化及其货架期研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(11): 2698-2709. |
| [5] | 张娜, 周慕川, 王庆港, 丁玉先, 陈爱强. 热水处理对南丰蜜橘贮藏品质的影响及传热分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(2): 370-377. |
| [6] | 冯荦荦, 郜海燕, 张润光, 闫欣鹏, 张娅妮, 韩齐齐, 张有林. 不同气体成分贮藏对狗头枣鲜果生理变化与品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(4): 704-713. |
| [7] | 刘均, 沈佳敏, 沈建良, 刘雅丽. 不同包装方式对货架期冷鲜鸡微生物菌相变化的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(7): 1274-1280. |
| [8] | 朱伟成, 郜海燕, 韩延超, 李大祥, 陈杭君. 不同预冷方式对茭白采后降温速度和贮藏品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(10): 1873-1879. |
| [9] | 马露, 孔维洲, 王丽萍, 张喜康, 王聪, 李佩佩, 刘敦华. 响应面法优化发酵鹿肉干工艺及其货架期预测[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(12): 2109-2119. |
| [10] | 杨晋恒, 郜海燕, 周拥军, 陈杭君, 穆宏磊, 汪伟. 臭氧处理对香菇采后品质与生理的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(7): 1201-1207. |
| [11] | 王健,宋亚,方佳宁,杨静*. 植酸处理对鲜切紫甘蓝品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(11): 2017-. |
| [12] | 朱丽娅1,2,郜海燕2,陈杭君2,*,房祥军2. 温度对冷冻干燥草莓果粉贮藏品质的影响 [J]. 浙江农业学报, 2014, 26(6): 1622-. |
| [13] | 祝美云;魏征;赵光辉;徐培东. 影响鲜切甘薯保鲜的因素研究[J]. , 2008, 20(6): 0-490. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||