浙江农业学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 559-567.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20250184
唐宁安(
), 胡梦茜, 范敏, 方建锋, 傅丽, 姜余捷, 姜铭北(
)
收稿日期:2025-03-10
出版日期:2026-03-25
发布日期:2026-04-17
作者简介:*姜铭北,E-mail:13516870280@163.com通讯作者:
姜铭北
TANG Ning’an(
), HU Mengxi, FAN Min, FANG Jianfeng, FU Li, JIANG Yujie, JIANG Mingbei(
)
Received:2025-03-10
Published:2026-03-25
Online:2026-04-17
Contact:
JIANG Mingbei
摘要:
本文以杭州市西部丘陵山地与河谷平原土壤为研究对象,采集了95份涉及不同土壤类型与土地利用方式的土壤样品,分析其有机碳、全氮、全磷含量与化学计量比特征,探讨海拔、湿度等自然因素和土地利用方式等人为因素对土壤有机碳、全氮、全磷化学计量比的影响。结果表明,丘陵山地区林地土壤的有机碳/全氮比(C/N)、有机碳/全磷比(C/P)和全氮/全磷比(N/P)随海拔升高而增加,河谷平原区水田土壤的C/N、C/P和N/P随土壤湿度的增加而增加。自然土壤开发成为旱地(包括蔬菜地)和园地(茶园和果园)等农业用地后,其有机碳含量下降但全磷含量增加,造成土壤C/N、C/P和N/P均趋向降低;水田较旱地土壤有机碳、全氮含量均增加,但有机碳含量的增加幅度高于全氮,导致水田C/N高于旱地。与C/P与N/P的空间变化较大不同,因有机碳与全氮之间具有很好的耦合关系,土壤C/N相对稳定,变化幅度较小。从C/N、C/P和N/P的比值来看,氮是研究区生态系统的主要限制元素。
中图分类号:
唐宁安, 胡梦茜, 范敏, 方建锋, 傅丽, 姜余捷, 姜铭北. 杭州市西部地区土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(3): 559-567.
TANG Ning’an, HU Mengxi, FAN Min, FANG Jianfeng, FU Li, JIANG Yujie, JIANG Mingbei. Ecological stoichiometric characteristics of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in the western region of Hangzhou City, China[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(3): 559-567.
| 土地利用方式 Land use pattern | 海拔/m Altitude/m | ωOC/(g·kg-1) | ωTN/(g·kg-1) | ωTP/(g·kg-1) | C/N | C/P | N/P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 林地 Forest land | 50~250 | 26.39±1.70 d | 1.94±0.14 c | 0.45±0.03 b | 13.59±0.60 b | 58.73±6.21 c | 4.33±0.51 ab |
| >250~500 | 26.23±2.74 d | 1.92±0.14 c | 0.44±0.05 b | 13.61±0.59 b | 60.22±11.77 bc | 4.40±0.70 ab | |
| >500~750 | 30.80±3.04 c | 2.14±0.11 bc | 0.48±0.06 b | 14.36±0.80 b | 65.60±12.77 bc | 4.53±0.66 ab | |
| >750~1 000 | 31.35±2.00 c | 2.20±0.20 b | 0.57±0.06 ab | 14.28±0.70 b | 56.07±7.25 c | 3.92±0.41 b | |
| >1 000~1 250 | 40.88±3.74 b | 2.83±0.18 a | 0.59±0.04 ab | 14.45±0.62 b | 69.90±6.03 b | 4.84±0.44 a | |
| >1 250~1 500 | 48.36±4.38 a | 2.94±0.30 a | 0.63±0.05 a | 16.50±0.85 a | 77.31±4.01 a | 4.70±0.35 a | |
| 茶园 Tea garden | >50~250 | 14.37±1.98 d | 1.28±0.17 c | 0.89±0.12 a | 11.20±0.80 b | 16.53±3.45 d | 1.47±0.26 d |
| >250~500 | 17.53±1.06 c | 1.56±0.07 b | 0.81±0.06 a | 11.28±0.73 b | 21.62±1.11 c | 1.93±0.17 c | |
| >500~750 | 20.92±2.39 b | 1.68±0.26 ab | 0.62±0.05 b | 12.55±0.69 a | 33.54±1.47 b | 2.68±0.23 b | |
| >750~1 000 | 26.13±1.90 a | 1.95±0.23 a | 0.65±0.05 b | 13.48±0.65 a | 40.39±4.16 a | 3.01±0.45 a | |
| 旱地 Upland | 50~250 | 12.48±1.28 c | 1.27±0.10 b | 0.65±0.10 ab | 9.84±0.45 c | 19.94±4.92 c | 2.01±0.42 bc |
| >250~500 | 14.38±0.86 c | 1.38±0.10 b | 0.73±0.05 a | 10.43±0.34 c | 19.93±2.11 c | 1.92±0.24 c | |
| >500~750 | 17.17±0.96 b | 1.54±0.05 a | 0.63±0.04 bc | 11.12±0.64 b | 27.56±2.56 b | 2.48±0.22 ab | |
| >750~1 000 | 21.08±1.77 a | 1.67±0.24 a | 0.60±0.03 c | 12.69±0.73 a | 35.00±3.51 a | 2.78±0.40 a |
表1 土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征随海拔的变化
Table 1 Variations of soil carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus stoichiometric characteristics with altitude
| 土地利用方式 Land use pattern | 海拔/m Altitude/m | ωOC/(g·kg-1) | ωTN/(g·kg-1) | ωTP/(g·kg-1) | C/N | C/P | N/P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 林地 Forest land | 50~250 | 26.39±1.70 d | 1.94±0.14 c | 0.45±0.03 b | 13.59±0.60 b | 58.73±6.21 c | 4.33±0.51 ab |
| >250~500 | 26.23±2.74 d | 1.92±0.14 c | 0.44±0.05 b | 13.61±0.59 b | 60.22±11.77 bc | 4.40±0.70 ab | |
| >500~750 | 30.80±3.04 c | 2.14±0.11 bc | 0.48±0.06 b | 14.36±0.80 b | 65.60±12.77 bc | 4.53±0.66 ab | |
| >750~1 000 | 31.35±2.00 c | 2.20±0.20 b | 0.57±0.06 ab | 14.28±0.70 b | 56.07±7.25 c | 3.92±0.41 b | |
| >1 000~1 250 | 40.88±3.74 b | 2.83±0.18 a | 0.59±0.04 ab | 14.45±0.62 b | 69.90±6.03 b | 4.84±0.44 a | |
| >1 250~1 500 | 48.36±4.38 a | 2.94±0.30 a | 0.63±0.05 a | 16.50±0.85 a | 77.31±4.01 a | 4.70±0.35 a | |
| 茶园 Tea garden | >50~250 | 14.37±1.98 d | 1.28±0.17 c | 0.89±0.12 a | 11.20±0.80 b | 16.53±3.45 d | 1.47±0.26 d |
| >250~500 | 17.53±1.06 c | 1.56±0.07 b | 0.81±0.06 a | 11.28±0.73 b | 21.62±1.11 c | 1.93±0.17 c | |
| >500~750 | 20.92±2.39 b | 1.68±0.26 ab | 0.62±0.05 b | 12.55±0.69 a | 33.54±1.47 b | 2.68±0.23 b | |
| >750~1 000 | 26.13±1.90 a | 1.95±0.23 a | 0.65±0.05 b | 13.48±0.65 a | 40.39±4.16 a | 3.01±0.45 a | |
| 旱地 Upland | 50~250 | 12.48±1.28 c | 1.27±0.10 b | 0.65±0.10 ab | 9.84±0.45 c | 19.94±4.92 c | 2.01±0.42 bc |
| >250~500 | 14.38±0.86 c | 1.38±0.10 b | 0.73±0.05 a | 10.43±0.34 c | 19.93±2.11 c | 1.92±0.24 c | |
| >500~750 | 17.17±0.96 b | 1.54±0.05 a | 0.63±0.04 bc | 11.12±0.64 b | 27.56±2.56 b | 2.48±0.22 ab | |
| >750~1 000 | 21.08±1.77 a | 1.67±0.24 a | 0.60±0.03 c | 12.69±0.73 a | 35.00±3.51 a | 2.78±0.40 a |
| 海拔/m Altitude/m | 土地利用方式 Land use pattern | ωOC/(g·kg-1) | ωTN/(g·kg-1) | ωTP/(g·kg-1) | C/N | C/P | N/P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50~250 | 林地Forest land | 26.39±1.70 a | 1.94±0.14 a | 0.45±0.03 c | 13.59±0.60 a | 58.73±6.21 a | 4.33±0.51 a |
| 茶园Tea garden | 14.37±1.98 b | 1.28±0.17 b | 0.89±0.12 a | 11.20±0.80 b | 16.53±3.45 b | 1.47±0.26 c | |
| 旱地Upland | 12.48±1.28 b | 1.27±0.10 b | 0.65±0.10 b | 9.84±0.45 c | 19.94±4.92 b | 2.01±0.42 b | |
| >250~500 | 林地Forest land | 26.23±2.74 a | 1.92±0.14 a | 0.44±0.05 b | 13.61±0.59 a | 60.22±11.77 a | 4.40±0.70 a |
| 茶园Tea garden | 17.53±1.06 b | 1.56±0.07 b | 0.81±0.06 a | 11.28±0.73 b | 21.62±1.11 b | 1.93±0.17 b | |
| 旱地Upland | 14.38±0.86 c | 1.38±0.10 c | 0.73±0.05 a | 10.43±0.34 c | 19.93±2.11 b | 1.92±0.24 b | |
| >500~750 | 林地Forest land | 30.80±3.04 a | 2.14±0.11 a | 0.48±0.06 b | 14.36±0.80 a | 65.60±12.77 a | 4.53±0.66 a |
| 茶园Tea garden | 20.92±2.39 b | 1.68±0.26 b | 0.62±0.05 a | 12.55±0.69 b | 33.54±1.47 b | 2.68±0.23 b | |
| 旱地Upland | 17.17±0.96 c | 1.54±0.05 b | 0.63±0.04 a | 11.12±0.64 c | 27.56±2.56 c | 2.48±0.22 b | |
| >750~1 000 | 林地Forest land | 31.35±2.00 a | 2.20±0.20 a | 0.57±0.06 b | 14.28±0.70 a | 56.07±7.25 a | 3.92±0.41 a |
| 茶园Tea garden | 26.13±1.90 b | 1.95±0.23 b | 0.65±0.05 a | 13.48±0.65 ab | 40.39±4.16 b | 3.01±0.45 b | |
| 旱地Upland | 21.08±1.77 c | 1.67±0.24 b | 0.60±0.03 ab | 12.69±0.73 b | 35.00±3.51 b | 2.78±0.40 b |
表2 不同土地利用方式下丘陵山地土壤的碳氮磷化学计量特征
Table 2 Stoichiometric characteristics of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus under different land use patterns in hilly and mountainous areas
| 海拔/m Altitude/m | 土地利用方式 Land use pattern | ωOC/(g·kg-1) | ωTN/(g·kg-1) | ωTP/(g·kg-1) | C/N | C/P | N/P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50~250 | 林地Forest land | 26.39±1.70 a | 1.94±0.14 a | 0.45±0.03 c | 13.59±0.60 a | 58.73±6.21 a | 4.33±0.51 a |
| 茶园Tea garden | 14.37±1.98 b | 1.28±0.17 b | 0.89±0.12 a | 11.20±0.80 b | 16.53±3.45 b | 1.47±0.26 c | |
| 旱地Upland | 12.48±1.28 b | 1.27±0.10 b | 0.65±0.10 b | 9.84±0.45 c | 19.94±4.92 b | 2.01±0.42 b | |
| >250~500 | 林地Forest land | 26.23±2.74 a | 1.92±0.14 a | 0.44±0.05 b | 13.61±0.59 a | 60.22±11.77 a | 4.40±0.70 a |
| 茶园Tea garden | 17.53±1.06 b | 1.56±0.07 b | 0.81±0.06 a | 11.28±0.73 b | 21.62±1.11 b | 1.93±0.17 b | |
| 旱地Upland | 14.38±0.86 c | 1.38±0.10 c | 0.73±0.05 a | 10.43±0.34 c | 19.93±2.11 b | 1.92±0.24 b | |
| >500~750 | 林地Forest land | 30.80±3.04 a | 2.14±0.11 a | 0.48±0.06 b | 14.36±0.80 a | 65.60±12.77 a | 4.53±0.66 a |
| 茶园Tea garden | 20.92±2.39 b | 1.68±0.26 b | 0.62±0.05 a | 12.55±0.69 b | 33.54±1.47 b | 2.68±0.23 b | |
| 旱地Upland | 17.17±0.96 c | 1.54±0.05 b | 0.63±0.04 a | 11.12±0.64 c | 27.56±2.56 c | 2.48±0.22 b | |
| >750~1 000 | 林地Forest land | 31.35±2.00 a | 2.20±0.20 a | 0.57±0.06 b | 14.28±0.70 a | 56.07±7.25 a | 3.92±0.41 a |
| 茶园Tea garden | 26.13±1.90 b | 1.95±0.23 b | 0.65±0.05 a | 13.48±0.65 ab | 40.39±4.16 b | 3.01±0.45 b | |
| 旱地Upland | 21.08±1.77 c | 1.67±0.24 b | 0.60±0.03 ab | 12.69±0.73 b | 35.00±3.51 b | 2.78±0.40 b |
| 亚类 Subgroup | ωOC/(g·kg-1) | ωTN/(g·kg-1) | ωTP/(g·kg-1) | C/N | C/P | N/P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 渗育Percolating | 17.10±1.34 c | 1.87±0.14 b | 0.58±0.07 a | 9.15±0.64 b | 29.79±2.01 c | 3.29±0.42 b |
| 潴育Hydromorphic | 20.08±1.52 b | 2.23±0.10 a | 0.53±0.07 a | 9.02±0.68 b | 38.40±5.29 b | 4.25±0.40 a |
| 潜育Gleying | 27.05±1.98 a | 2.23±0.20 a | 0.57±0.08 a | 12.18±0.94 a | 48.16±8.11 a | 3.99±0.79 ab |
表3 水稻土不同亚类的土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征
Table 3 Stoichiometric characteristics of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus of different subgroups of paddy soil
| 亚类 Subgroup | ωOC/(g·kg-1) | ωTN/(g·kg-1) | ωTP/(g·kg-1) | C/N | C/P | N/P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 渗育Percolating | 17.10±1.34 c | 1.87±0.14 b | 0.58±0.07 a | 9.15±0.64 b | 29.79±2.01 c | 3.29±0.42 b |
| 潴育Hydromorphic | 20.08±1.52 b | 2.23±0.10 a | 0.53±0.07 a | 9.02±0.68 b | 38.40±5.29 b | 4.25±0.40 a |
| 潜育Gleying | 27.05±1.98 a | 2.23±0.20 a | 0.57±0.08 a | 12.18±0.94 a | 48.16±8.11 a | 3.99±0.79 ab |
| 土地利用方式 Land use pattern | ωOC/(g·kg-1) | ωTN/(g·kg-1) | ωTP/(g·kg-1) | C/N | C/P | N/P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 水田Paddy field | 21.41±4.64 a | 2.11±0.24 a | 0.56±0.08 c | 10.12±1.71 ab | 38.79±9.76 a | 3.84±0.72 a |
| 蔬菜地Vegetable field | 14.15±0.94 b | 1.55±0.22 b | 1.11±0.21 a | 9.23±0.74 b | 13.27±2.80 c | 1.47±0.41 b |
| 果园Orchard | 14.43±0.77 b | 1.35±0.14 b | 0.84±0.07 b | 10.74±0.68 a | 17.31±1.86 b | 1.62±0.24 b |
表4 不同土地利用方式下河谷平原土壤的碳氮磷化学计量特征
Table 4 Stoichiometric characteristics of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in valley plains under different land use patterns
| 土地利用方式 Land use pattern | ωOC/(g·kg-1) | ωTN/(g·kg-1) | ωTP/(g·kg-1) | C/N | C/P | N/P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 水田Paddy field | 21.41±4.64 a | 2.11±0.24 a | 0.56±0.08 c | 10.12±1.71 ab | 38.79±9.76 a | 3.84±0.72 a |
| 蔬菜地Vegetable field | 14.15±0.94 b | 1.55±0.22 b | 1.11±0.21 a | 9.23±0.74 b | 13.27±2.80 c | 1.47±0.41 b |
| 果园Orchard | 14.43±0.77 b | 1.35±0.14 b | 0.84±0.07 b | 10.74±0.68 a | 17.31±1.86 b | 1.62±0.24 b |
| 地貌Landform | ωOC/(g·kg-1) | ωTN/(g·kg-1) | ωTP/(g·kg-1) | C/N | C/P | N/P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 丘陵山地 Hilly-mountainous regions | 24.86±10.37 a | 1.88±0.53 a | 0.62±0.14 a | 12.81±1.93 a | 43.02±21.32 a | 3.21±1.24 a |
| 河谷平原Valley plains | 18.56±5.05 a | 1.85±0.40 a | 0.73±0.25 a | 10.06±1.47 b | 29.39±14.06 b | 2.92±1.29 a |
表5 不同地貌区土壤的碳氮磷化学计量特征
Table 5 Stoichiometric characteristics of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in different geomorphic regions
| 地貌Landform | ωOC/(g·kg-1) | ωTN/(g·kg-1) | ωTP/(g·kg-1) | C/N | C/P | N/P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 丘陵山地 Hilly-mountainous regions | 24.86±10.37 a | 1.88±0.53 a | 0.62±0.14 a | 12.81±1.93 a | 43.02±21.32 a | 3.21±1.24 a |
| 河谷平原Valley plains | 18.56±5.05 a | 1.85±0.40 a | 0.73±0.25 a | 10.06±1.47 b | 29.39±14.06 b | 2.92±1.29 a |
| [1] | 章明奎. 土壤地理学与土壤调查技术[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2011. |
| [2] | 毛晋花, 邢亚娟, 王庆贵. 外源碳氮对植物生态化学计量特征的影响研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(5): 54-60. |
| MAO J H, XING Y J, WANG Q G. Exogenous carbon and nitrogen: effects on plant ecological stoichiometry characteristics[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(5): 54-60. | |
| [3] | ELSER J J, STERNER R W, GOROKHOVA E, et al. Biological stoichiometry from genes to ecosystems[J]. Ecology Letters, 2000, 3(6): 540-550. |
| [4] | 刘超, 王洋, 王楠, 等. 陆地生态系统植被氮磷化学计量研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(11): 1205-1216. |
| LIU C, WANG Y, WANG N, et al. Advances research in plant nitrogen, phosphorus and their stoichiometry in terrestrial ecosystems: a review[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2012, 36(11): 1205-1216. | |
| [5] | 邬畏, 何兴东, 周启星. 生态系统氮磷比化学计量特征研究进展[J]. 中国沙漠, 2010, 30(2): 296-302. |
| WU W, HE X D, ZHOU Q X. Review on N: P stoichiometry in eco-system[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2010, 30(2): 296-302. | |
| [6] | 何锡文, 郭薇. 化学计量:取样学最近的进展[J]. 分析化学, 1995, 23(12): 1455-1461. |
| HE X W, GUO W. The recent development of chemometrics: sampling[J]. Chinese Journal of Analytieal Chemistry, 1995, 23(12): 1455-1461. | |
| [7] | 巢林, 曾鑫, 欧梦菲, 等. 喀斯特山区不同土地利用方式对土壤微生物生物量、酶活性及其化学计量的影响[J]. 山地学报, 2023, 41(1): 28-40. |
| CHAO L, ZENG X, OU M F, et al. Effects of different land use patterns on soil microbial biomass, enzyme activity and stoichiometry in the mountainous karst areas of China[J]. Mountain Research, 2023, 41(1): 28-40. | |
| [8] | 张志山, 杨贵森, 吕星宇, 等. 荒漠生态系统C、N、P生态化学计量研究进展[J]. 中国沙漠, 2022, 42(1): 48-56. |
| ZHANG Z S, YANG G S, LÜ X Y, et al. Research progresses in ecological stoichiometry of C, N and P in desert ecosystems[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(1): 48-56. | |
| [9] | 张明芳, 于雷, 戴梓萱, 等. 基于CNKI数据库对中国土地利用方式变化影响土壤有机碳趋势研究的文献计量分析[J]. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 56(6): 1044-1051. |
| ZHANG M F, YU L, DAI Z X, et al. Bibliometric analysis of the influence trend of land use change on soil organic carbon in China based on CNKI database[J]. Journal of Central China Normal University(Natural Sciences), 2022, 56(6): 1044-1051. | |
| [10] | 萨仁其力莫格, 荆佳强, 秦洁, 等. 不同利用方式下贝加尔针茅草原植物和土壤的生态化学计量特征[J]. 中国草地学报, 2022, 44(1): 20-29. |
| Sarenqilimoge, JING J Q, QIN J, et al. Ecological stoichiometric characteristics of plants and soil in Stipa baicalensis grassland under different utilization modes[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2022, 44(1): 20-29. | |
| [11] | 胡义, 唐力, 张瑜, 等. 南郑区不同土地利用方式下土壤养分及生态化学计量特征[J]. 陕西林业科技, 2021, 49(3): 7-12. |
| HU Y, TANG L, ZHANG Y, et al. Soil nutrient and ecological stoichiometry in different land use patterns in Nanzheng district of Hanzhong prefecture[J]. Shaanxi Forest Science and Technology, 2021, 49(3): 7-12. | |
| [12] | 胡亚伟, 孙若修, 申明爽, 等. 晋西黄土区土地利用方式对土壤C∶N∶P化学计量特征及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(4): 990-999. |
| HU Y W, SUN R X, SHEN M S, et al. Effects of land use types on the stoichiometric characteristics of soil C∶N∶P and the physical and chemical properties of soil in western Shanxi loess region[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(4): 990-999. | |
| [13] | 郭大勇, 刘海燕, 杜鹃, 等. 土地利用方式对豫西丘陵区土壤团聚体稳定性及其化学计量特征的影响[J]. 河南科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 45(3): 88-95. |
| GUO D Y, LIU H Y, DU J, et al. Effects of land use type on soil aggregate stability and its stoichiometric characteristics in hilly region of west Henan Province[J]. Journal of Henan University of Science and Technology(Natural Science), 2024, 45(3): 88-95. | |
| [14] | 颜雄, 李文昭, 周美姣, 等. 不同土地利用方式下土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 遵义师范学院学报, 2024, 26(1): 75-78. |
| YAN X, LI W Z, ZHOU M J, et al. Ecochemical stoichiometric characteristics of soil under different land use patterns[J]. Journal of Zunyi Normal University, 2024, 26(1): 75-78. | |
| [15] | 廖达航, 白银萍, 李富程, 等. 四川盆地40年耕地土壤化学计量变化特征[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2024, 30(2): 205-213. |
| LIAO D H, BAI Y P, LI F C, et al. Soil stoichiometric characteristics of cultivated land in the Sichuan Basin over 40 years[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2024, 30(2): 205-213. | |
| [16] | 姚卫举, 牟晓杰, 万斯昂, 等. 不同土地利用方式土壤碳、氮、磷、硫含量及其生态化学计量特征[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(17): 231-239. |
| YAO W J, MU X J, WAN S A, et al. Soil carbon,nitrogen,phosphorus and sulfur contents and their eco-stoichiometric characteristics under different land use patterns[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 51(17): 231-239. | |
| [17] | 郭超, 盛茂银, 何宇, 等. 土地利用方式对西南喀斯特土壤碳、氮、磷化学计量特征及酶活性的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2023, 54(2): 382-391. |
| GUO C, SHENG M Y, HE Y, et al. Effects of land use types on soil carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus stoichiometric characteristics and enzyme activities in the karst area of southwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2023, 54(2): 382-391. | |
| [18] | 孙彩丽, 王艺伟, 王从军, 等. 喀斯特山区土地利用方式转变对土壤酶活性及其化学计量特征的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(10): 4140-4149. |
| SUN C L, WANG Y W, WANG C J, et al. Effects of land use conversion on soil extracellular enzyme activity and its stoichiometric characteristics in karst mountainous areas[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(10): 4140-4149. | |
| [19] | 江叶枫, 叶英聪, 郭熙, 等. 江西省耕地土壤氮磷生态化学计量空间变异特征及其影响因素[J]. 土壤学报, 2017, 54(6): 1527-1539. |
| JIANG Y F, YE Y C, GUO X, et al. Spatial variability of ecological stoichiometry of soil nitrogen and phosphorus in farmlands of Jiangxi Province and its influencing factors[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2017, 54(6): 1527-1539. | |
| [20] | 冯德枫, 包维楷. 土壤碳氮磷化学计量比时空格局及影响因素研究进展[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2017, 23(2): 400-408. |
| FENG D F, BAO W K. Review of the temporal and spatial patterns of soil C: N: P stoichiometry and its driving factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2017, 23(2): 400-408. | |
| [21] | 周正虎, 王传宽. 帽儿山地区不同土地利用方式下土壤-微生物-矿化碳氮化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(7): 2428-2436. |
| ZHOU Z H, WANG C K. Soil-microbe-mineralization carbon and nitrogen stoichiometry under different land-uses in the Maoershan region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(7): 2428-2436. | |
| [22] | 李金澄, 吴迪. 土壤反硝化产物N2O/N2化学计量比例研究进展[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2023, 40(6): 1287-1295. |
| LI J C, WU D. Research progress on stoichiometric ratio of soil denitrification products N2O/N2[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2023, 40(6): 1287-1295. | |
| [23] | 王慧, 郭月峰, 姚云峰, 等. 不同土地利用方式下土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征[J]. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(5): 995-1000. |
| WANG H, GUO Y F, YAO Y F, et al. Ecological stoichiometry of soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus under different land use patterns[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 33(5): 995-1000. | |
| [24] | 罗由林, 李启权, 王昌全, 等. 近30年川中丘陵区不同土地利用方式土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征变化[J]. 土壤, 2016, 48(4): 726-733. |
| LUO Y L, LI Q Q, WANG C Q, et al. Last 30a changes of C, N and P ecological stoichiometry of different land use types in hilly area of mid-Sichuan basin, southwest China[J]. Soils, 2016, 48(4): 726-733. | |
| [25] | 张晗, 欧阳真程, 赵小敏. 不同利用方式对江西省农田土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2019, 39(3): 939-951. |
| ZHANG H, OUYANG Z C, ZHAO X M. Effects of different land use types on ecological stoichiometry characteristics of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in farmland soils in Jiangxi Province, China[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2019, 39(3): 939-951. | |
| [26] | 牟晓杰, 孙志高, 刘兴土. 黄河口典型潮滩湿地土壤净氮矿化与硝化作用[J]. 中国环境科学, 2015, 35(5): 1466-1473. |
| MOU X J, SUN Z G, LIU X T. Net nitrogen mineralization and nitrification in the tidal marsh soils of the Yellow River Estuary[J]. China Environmental Science, 2015, 35(5): 1466-1473. | |
| [27] | 刘帅楠, 李广, 杨传杰, 等. 植被类型对黄土丘陵区土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征的季节变异[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(6): 343-349. |
| LIU S N, LI G, YANG C J, et al. Seasonal variation of soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry under different vegetation types in Loess Hilly Region[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 35(6): 343-349. | |
| [28] | 陈志杰, 肖宇童, 董雄德, 等. 黄河中下游滩区泥沙淤积对土壤化学计量比的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(7): 1334-1341. |
| CHEN Z J, XIAO Y T, DONG X D, et al. Effects of sediment deposition on soil stoichiometric ratios in the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2022, 41(7): 1334-1341. | |
| [29] | 王绍强, 于贵瑞. 生态系统碳氮磷元素的生态化学计量学特征[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(8): 3937-3947. |
| WANG S Q, YU G R. Ecological stoichiometry characteristics of ecosystem carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus elements[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(8): 3937-3947. | |
| [30] | 张剑, 宿力, 王利平, 等. 植被盖度对土壤碳、氮、磷生态化学计量比的影响: 以敦煌阳关湿地为例[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(2): 580-589. |
| ZHANG J, SU L, WANG L P, et al. The effect of vegetation cover on ecological stoichiometric ratios of soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus: a case study of the Dunhuang Yangguan wetland[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(2): 580-589. |
| [1] | 韦庆翠, 姜娜英, 沈骏扬, 张焕朝, 张衡锋. 化肥减量配施生物质炭对高沙土氮磷淋失及土壤性质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1943-1950. |
| [2] | 王丽, 陈立明, 王鹏飞, 张彬, 穆霄鹏. 有机肥配施菌肥对欧李果实品质和土壤性质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(4): 820-830. |
| [3] | 李腾飞, 杨桂玲, 阮美颖, 褚田芬, 秦华, 邓美华. 不同肥药管理对设施番茄生产系统土壤健康与番茄性状的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(1): 145-158. |
| [4] | 吴娇, 龚成宇, 陈超群, 陈红旭, 刘俊宏, 唐文静, 初元琦, 杨文龙, 张瑶, 龚荣高. 不同海拔黄果柑果实有机酸代谢的生态响应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 853-861. |
| [5] | 张青青, 梁晶, 伍海兵, 郑思俊, 黄军华. 城市化进程中土地利用方式改变对土壤有机碳库的影响——以上海三林楔形绿地为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(6): 1062-1068. |
| [6] | 范琳娟, 刘子荣, 徐雪亮, 王奋山, 彭德良, 姚英娟. 山药不同种植模式对土壤线虫群落结构和土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(2): 316-325. |
| [7] | 隋夕然, 王妍, 刘云根, 张雅洁, 吴丽芳. 典型喀斯特区云南松林土壤养分和细菌群落对海拔的响应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(12): 2348-2357. |
| [8] | 简兴, 翟晓钰, 王喻, 蔡阳阳. 土地利用方式改变对湿地土壤总有机碳与可溶性有机碳的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(3): 475-482. |
| [9] | 连玉珍, 刘合满, 曹丽花, 韩晓浩, 马和平. 西藏林芝不同土地利用方式的土壤团聚体及其有机碳分布[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(8): 1353-1360. |
| [10] | 唐海龙, 龚伟, 王景燕, 舒正悦, 熊靓, 蔡煜, 林梅. 土壤分散性与分形维数对坡耕地转变为藤椒林地的响应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(10): 1739-1747. |
| [11] | 蓝家程, 肖时珍, 林俊清, 沈艳. 土地利用方式对岩溶山地土壤轻组和重组有机碳的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(10): 1720-1725. |
| [12] | 杨红, 徐唱唱, 赛曼, 曹舰艇, 曹丽花, 张爱琴, 刘合满. 不同土地利用方式对土壤含水量、pH值及电导率的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(11): 1922-1927. |
| [13] | 简兴1,2,王松3,王玉良3,汪建飞1,2. 城市湿地周边不同土地利用方式下土壤有机碳及其活性组分特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(1): 119-. |
| [14] | 吴崇书1,谢国雄2,章明奎3,*. 农艺措施与土地利用方式转变对土壤碳库管理指数的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(4): 611-. |
| [15] | 宋碧清1,2,*,王莎莎3,*,郑昀晔1,2,马文广1,2,**. 不同海拔产地烟草种子的萌发及抗逆相关基因表达研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(3): 321-. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||