有机肥配施菌肥对欧李果实品质和土壤性质的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240328

浙江农业学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 820-830.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240328

有机肥配施菌肥对欧李果实品质和土壤性质的影响

王丽(), 陈立明, 王鹏飞, 张彬, 穆霄鹏^*()

山西农业大学园艺学院,山西晋中 030801

收稿日期:2024-04-09 出版日期:2025-04-25 发布日期:2025-05-09
作者简介:王丽(1999—),女,山西长治人,硕士,主要从事园艺植物种质创新与利用研究。E-mail:13513553741@163.com
通讯作者: *穆霄鹏,E-mail:15110671026@163.com
基金资助:
山西农业大学科技创新基金(2018YJ06)

Effects of organic fertilizer combined with bacterial fertilizer on fruit quality and soil properties of Cerasus humilis

WANG Li(), CHEN Liming, WANG Pengfei, ZHANG Bin, MU Xiaopeng^*()

College of Horticulture, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, Shanxi, China

Received:2024-04-09 Online:2025-04-25 Published:2025-05-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 选取欧李品种晋欧1号为试验材料,设置不同用量有机肥单施及与菌肥配施的对比试验,在欧李成熟期测定果实品质、土壤酶活性、土壤理化性质等指标。结果显示,每株施用有机肥1 000 g+菌肥100 g处理(J6)的果实横径、纵径、单果重均显著(P<0.05)高于不施肥的对照(J0)、单施等量有机肥(J2)或等量菌肥(J4)的处理。与J0、J2、J4处理相比,J6处理果实的可滴定酸含量显著降低,但果实的可溶性固形物含量、固酸比、果实硬度、类黄酮含量显著更高,土壤蔗糖酶、脲酶、过氧化氢酶活性,及土壤有机质、碱解氮、有效磷、速效钾含量均显著更高,说明有机肥配施菌肥的处理在提升果实品质、维持土壤肥力方面的效果要优于单施一种肥的处理。此外,各施肥处理的土壤pH值均显著低于J0处理。经过隶属函数法综合分析,J6处理的隶属函数值最高,是该试验条件下的最优处理,提高果实品质和土壤肥力的效果最优。

关键词: 有机肥, 菌肥, 欧李, 果实品质, 土壤性质

Abstract:

In the present study, Cerasus humilis cv. Jin’ou No. 1 was selected as the experimental material. Different rates of organic fertilizer were applied alone or in combination with bacterial fertilizer. Fruit quality, soil enzymes activity, and soil physicochemical properties were measured at the maturity stage of C. humilis. It was shown that, the transverse diameter, vertical diameter and single fruit weight under the J6 treatment with application of 1 000 g organic fertilizer and 100 g bacterial fertilizer per tree were significantly (P<0.05) larger than those under the control (J0) treatment without application of any fertilizer and the treatment with application of equivalent rate of organic fertilizer (J2) or bacterial fertilizer (J4) alone. Compared with the treatments of J0, J2 and J4, the titratable acidity of fruit under J6 treatment was significantly lower, yet the total soluble solid content, ratio of total soluble solid to titratable acidity, fruit firmness, flavonoids content in fruit were significantly higher, the activity of soil sucrase, urease and catalase was significantly stronger, and the contents of soil organic matter, alkaline hydrolysable nitrogen, available phosphorus, available potassium were significantly higher. These results indicated that the effect of combination of organic fertilizer and bacterial fertilizer was better on improving fruit quality and soil fertility than that of organic fertilizer or bacterial fertilizer applied alone. The soil pH under the treatments with application of fertilizer was significantly higher than that under the J0 treatment. Through comprehensive analysis based on the membership function method, it was revealed that the J6 treatment exhibited the highest score, which was the best treatment under the experiment condition with good potential in improving both fruit quality and soil fertility.

Key words: organic fertilizer, bacterial fertilizer, Cerasus humilis, fruit quality, soil property

中图分类号:

S662.306.2

王丽, 陈立明, 王鹏飞, 张彬, 穆霄鹏. 有机肥配施菌肥对欧李果实品质和土壤性质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(4): 820-830.

WANG Li, CHEN Liming, WANG Pengfei, ZHANG Bin, MU Xiaopeng. Effects of organic fertilizer combined with bacterial fertilizer on fruit quality and soil properties of Cerasus humilis[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(4): 820-830.

图/表 6

参考文献 34

[1]	李树青. 不同欧李资源果实和叶片酚类物质含量及抗氧化活性的研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2021.
	LI S Q. Study on phenolic content and antioxidant activity in fruits and leaves of different Cerasus humilis resources[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	杜俊杰, 杜俊民, 池建伟. 欧李系列产品的研制[J]. 山西农业大学学报, 1999, 19(1): 29-30.
	DU J J, DU J M, CHI J W. Development of Prunus humilis series products[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University, 1999, 19(1): 29-30. (in Chinese)
[3]	王程成. 菌肥与化肥、有机肥配施对库尔勒香梨园土壤性质、生长及果实品质的影响[D]. 阿拉尔: 塔里木大学, 2022.
	WANG C C. Effects of combined application of bacterial fertilizer, chemical fertilizer and organic fertilizer on growth, fruit quality and soil properties of Korla pear orchard[D]. Aral: Tarim University, 2022. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	丁文成, 何萍, 周卫. 我国新型肥料产业发展战略研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2023, 29(2): 201-221.
	DING W C, HE P, ZHOU W. Development strategies of the new-type fertilizer industry in China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2023, 29(2): 201-221. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	谢蜀豫, 曹慕明, 黄秋凤, 等. 有机肥、微生物肥与化肥配施对阳光玫瑰葡萄果实品质及香气物质的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2022, 35(1): 153-161.
	XIE S Y, CAO M M, HUANG Q F, et al. Effect of organic fertilizer, microbial fertilizer combined with chemical fertilizer on fruit quality and aroma components in Shine Muscat grape[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 35(1): 153-161. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	顾欣, 孙权, 王锐, 等. 菌肥与有机肥配施对拱棚西瓜土壤的改良效果[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017, 35(3): 219-225.
	GU X, SUN Q, WANG R, et al. Microbial fertilizer and organic fertilizer on soil improvement effect of plastic shed watermelon[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2017, 35(3): 219-225. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	谢元梅, 张秀志, 王洪涛, 等. 有机肥配施土壤调理剂和菌肥对苹果园土壤肥力及蜜脆苹果果实品质的影响[J]. 中国果树, 2022(5): 28-33.
	XIE Y M, ZHANG X Z, WANG H T, et al. Effects of combined application of organic fertilizer with soil conditioner and microbial fertilizer on soil fertility and fruit quality of ‘Honeycrisp’ apple[J]. China Fruits, 2022(5): 28-33. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	张瑜, 王鹏飞, 穆霄鹏, 等. 喷施不同叶面肥对‘农大4号’欧李果实糖酸含量的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2019, 51(3): 77-80.
	ZHANG Y, WANG P F, MU X P, et al. Effects of spraying different foliar fertilizers on sugar and acid Contents of nongda 4 Cerasus humilis fruit[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 51(3): 77-80. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	WANG X Z, BAO Q, SUN G T, et al. Application of homemade organic fertilizer for improving quality of apple fruit, soil physicochemical characteristics, and microbial diversity[J]. Agronomy, 2022, 12(9): 2055.
[10]	乔羽佳, 王鹏飞, 张建成, 等. 光照强度对欧李果实成熟期及品质的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2019, 47(5): 865-869.
	QIAO Y J, WANG P F, ZHANG J C, et al. Effects of light intensity on fruit mature period and quality of Chinese dwarf cherry[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(5): 865-869. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	邵文山, 李国旗. 土壤酶功能及测定方法研究进展[J]. 北方园艺, 2016(9): 188-193.
	SHAO W S, LI G Q. Research progress of soil enzymes function and its determination method[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2016(9): 188-193. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	裴玲芳, 范贵鹏, 肖美玲, 等. 两种方法测定土壤中过氧化氢酶比较[J]. 科技创新与应用, 2019(15): 145-146.
	PEI L F, FAN G P, XIAO M L, et al. Comparison of two methods for determination of catalase in soil[J]. Technology Innovation and Application, 2019(15): 145-146. (in Chinese)
[13]	张秀志. 不同施肥处理下‘蜜脆’苹果叶片营养与果实品质及土壤肥力的分析[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2021.
	ZHANG X Z. Analysis on leaf nutrition and fruit quality of ‘Honeycrisp’ apple and soil fertility under different fertilization treatments[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	杨国权, 周建国, 周晓康, 等. 生物有机肥对山地花牛苹果品质及产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(5): 1190-1194.
	YANG G Q, ZHOU J G, ZHOU X K, et al. Effect of bio-organic fertilizer on quality and yield of Mountain Huaniu apple[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 64(5): 1190-1194. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	杜鑫宇, 周思邈, 梁晓飞, 等. 不同施肥梯度对桃树果实品质的影响[J]. 北方果树, 2022(2): 12-15.
	DU X Y, ZHOU S M, LIANG X F, et al. Effects of different fertilization gradients on fruit quality of peach[J]. Northern Fruits, 2022(2): 12-15. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	蒋强, 刘子凡, 王燕武, 等. 生物有机肥替代化肥对樱桃番茄产量、品质及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2023, 36(10): 71-77.
	JIANG Q, LIU Z F, WANG Y W, et al. Effects of bio-organic fertilizer application as partial replacement for chemical fertilizers on yield, quality and soil fertility of cherry tomatoes[J]. China Cucurbits and Vegetables, 2023, 36(10): 71-77. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	范洁群, 褚长彬, 吴淑杭, 等. 不同微生物菌肥对桃园土壤微生物活性和果实品质的影响[J]. 上海农业学报, 2013, 29(1): 51-54.
	FAN J Q, CHU C B, WU S H, et al. Effects of bio-fertilizers on soil microbes and fruit quality of peach[J]. Acta Agriculturae Shanghai, 2013, 29(1): 51-54. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	王小兵, 张森, 吴刚, 等. 微生物菌肥对香梨果实品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科技, 2009(3): 45-46.
	WANG X B, ZHANG S, WU G, et al. Effect of microbial fertilizer on fruit quality of fragrant pear[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Science and Technology, 2009(3): 45-46. (in Chinese)
[19]	顾欣, 何继涛, 曹云娥, 等. 有机肥与菌肥配施对拱棚西瓜生长和品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2016(18): 39-43.
	GU X, HE J T, CAO Y E, et al. Effect of organic fertilizer combined with microbial fertilizer on watermelon growth and quality in plastic shed[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2016(18): 39-43. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	陈德秀, 王连春, 普应斌, 等. 有机肥和生物炭施用对猕猴桃果实品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2022(2): 18-26.
	CHEN D X, WANG L C, PU Y B, et al. Effects of organic fertilizer and biochar application on fruit quality of kiwifruit[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2022(2): 18-26. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	刘美迎, 李小龙, 梁茁, 等. 基于模糊数学和聚类分析的鲜食葡萄品种综合品质评价[J]. 食品科学, 2015, 36(13): 57-64.
	LIU M Y, LI X L, LIANG Z, et al. Comprehensive quality assessment of table grapes varieties using fuzzy mathematics and cluster analysis[J]. Food Science, 2015, 36(13): 57-64. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	黄婉莉, 张朝坤, 康仕成, 等. 氮磷钾配比施肥对番石榴生长发育和果实品质的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2022, 53(5): 1288-1295.
	HUANG W L, ZHANG C K, KANG S C, et al. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium ratio of fertilization on the growth and development and fruit quality of Psidium guajava L[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2022, 53(5): 1288-1295. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	车琴琴, 仇丽娜, 王永章. 海藻生物肥对烟富3苹果生长发育和果实品质的调控效应[J]. 现代农业科技, 2020(24): 50-52, 66.
	CHE Q Q, QIU L N, WANG Y Z. Regulating effect of seaweed bio-fertilizer on vegetative growth and fruit quality of Yanfu 3 apple[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020(24): 50-52, 66. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	童盼盼, 王龙, 张亚若, 等. 有机肥和菌肥对库尔勒香梨果实品质及香气的影响[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2021, 40(4): 114-122.
	TONG P P, WANG L, ZHANG Y R, et al. Effects of different combination of organic fertilizer and bacterial manure on fruit quality and aroma of Korla fragrant pear[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2021, 40(4): 114-122. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	靳冯芝. 不同特性肥料对南丰蜜橘果实品质的影响[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2013.
	JIN F Z. Effects of different characteristic fertilizers on fruit quality of Nanfeng tangerine[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2013. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	樊树雷, 李忠元, 徐沁怡, 等. 生物炭、EM菌有机肥和化肥混施对桃园土壤肥力、树体生长及果实品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(11): 77-82.
	FAN S L, LI Z Y, XU Q Y, et al. Effects of mixed application of biochar, EM bacteria organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer on soil fertility, tree growth and fruit quality in peach orchard[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2022(11): 77-82. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	于占东, 刘云峰, 温丹, 等. 有机肥配施生物菌肥对设施蔬菜土壤改良及面条菜生长、品质的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2022, 54(8): 99-103.
	YU Z D, LIU Y F, WEN D, et al. Effects of organic fertilizer combined with biological bacterial fertilizer on facility soil improvement and growth and quality of Silene conoidea L[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 54(8): 99-103. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	王鹏, 温明霞, 金龙飞, 等. 不同施肥处理对柑橘根围土壤质量及丛枝菌根定殖的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2805-2812.
	WANG P, WEN M X, JIN L F, et al. Effects of different fertilizer applications on citrus rhizosphere soil quality and arbuscular mycorrhizae colonization[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(10): 2805-2812. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	杨囡君, 秦涛, 决超. 不同有机肥配施土壤调理剂对黄瓜连作土壤碳氮及酶活性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2024, 52(1): 225-231.
	YANG N J, QIN T, JUE C. Impacts of different organic fertilizer combined with soil conditioner on soil carbon, nitrogen contents and enzyme activities under cucumber continuous cropping[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 52(1): 225-231. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	弓萌萌, 王红, 张雪梅, 等. 不同有机肥施用量对苹果园土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2019, 34(3): 74-78.
	GONG M M, WANG H, ZHANG X M, et al. Effects of different organic fertilizer amounts on soil nutrient and enzyme activity of apple orchard[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2019, 34(3): 74-78. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	门倩, 海江波, 岳忠娜, 等. 化肥减量对玉米田土壤酶活性及微生物量的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 40(6): 133-140.
	MEN Q, HAI J B, YUE Z N, et al. Effects on maize field soil enzyme activities and microbial biomass of chemical fertilizer reduction[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University(Natural Science Edition), 2012, 40(6): 133-140. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	黄炳旭, 武莉琴, 陈虹宇, 等. 生物有机肥施用量对木瓜杏果实品质及其栽培土壤肥力的影响[J]. 经济林研究, 2023, 41(1): 124-132.
	HUANG B X, WU L Q, CHEN H Y, et al. Effects of bio organic fertilizer application on soil physical and chemical properties and fruit quality of ‘Mugua’ apricot[J]. Non-wood Forest Research, 2023, 41(1): 124-132. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	王哲. 不同有机肥对猕猴桃果园土壤理化性质及果实品质的影响[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2021.
	WANG Z. Effects of different organic fertilizers on soil physicochemical properties and fruit quality of kiwifruit orchard[D]. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34]	闫凤丹. 增施有机肥和叶面肥对葡萄生长和果实品质的影响[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2022.
	YAN F D. Effects of organic fertilizer and foliar fertilizer on grape growth and fruit quality[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2022. (in Chinese with English abstract)

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

153

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	13	0	0	140

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	142	11
比例	93%	7%

摘要

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	60

	来源	本网站

	次数	60
	比例	100%

处理 Treatment	横径 Transverse diameter/mm	纵径 Vertical diameter/mm	果型指数 Fruit shape index	单果重 Single fruit weight/g
J0	17.33±0.40 e	15.00±0.69 e	0.87±0.02 a	3.03±0.09 e
J1	21.10±0.30 d	17.50±0.92 cd	0.83±0.06 ab	4.09±0.09 d
J2	22.47±0.21 c	18.60±0.46 bc	0.83±0.02 ab	4.91±0.17 c
J3	23.23±0.31 b	17.96±0.15 cd	0.77±0.01 c	5.38±0.16 b
J4	21.40±0.10 d	17.10±0.17 d	0.80±0.01 bc	4.68±0.16 c
J5	23.13±0.35 b	18.57±0.86 bc	0.81±0.04 bc	5.49±0.22 b
J6	24.27±0.25 a	20.53±0.25 a	0.84±0.01 ab	6.30±0.13 a
J7	23.60±0.17 b	19.27±0.35 b	0.82±0.01 abc	5.36±0.08 b

处理 Treatment	横径 Transverse diameter/mm	纵径 Vertical diameter/mm	果型指数 Fruit shape index	单果重 Single fruit weight/g
J0	17.33±0.40 e	15.00±0.69 e	0.87±0.02 a	3.03±0.09 e
J1	21.10±0.30 d	17.50±0.92 cd	0.83±0.06 ab	4.09±0.09 d
J2	22.47±0.21 c	18.60±0.46 bc	0.83±0.02 ab	4.91±0.17 c
J3	23.23±0.31 b	17.96±0.15 cd	0.77±0.01 c	5.38±0.16 b
J4	21.40±0.10 d	17.10±0.17 d	0.80±0.01 bc	4.68±0.16 c
J5	23.13±0.35 b	18.57±0.86 bc	0.81±0.04 bc	5.49±0.22 b
J6	24.27±0.25 a	20.53±0.25 a	0.84±0.01 ab	6.30±0.13 a
J7	23.60±0.17 b	19.27±0.35 b	0.82±0.01 abc	5.36±0.08 b

处理 Treatment	TSS/%	TA/%	RTT	FF/N	Fla/(mg·kg^-1)
J0	11.53±0.25 g	1.65±0.02 a	7.01±0.16 g	15.40±0.23 e	5.87±0.14 e
J1	12.90±0.46 f	1.46±0.04 b	8.85±0.37 f	17.35±0.29 cd	6.64±0.19 c
J2	13.93±0.12 e	1.13±0.04 d	12.34±0.53 e	18.17±0.18 c	6.88±0.11 c
J3	15.70±0.36 c	0.91±0.01 f	17.28±0.58 c	19.39±1.03 b	8.15±0.05 a
J4	13.73±0.25 e	1.23±0.03 c	11.14±0.04 e	16.65±0.47 d	5.96±0.03 e
J5	16.83±0.29 b	0.84±0.02 g	20.06±0.84 b	17.85±0.12 c	7.58±0.04 b
J6	17.73±0.25 a	0.82±0.02 g	21.62±1.35 a	22.06±0.48 a	8.33±0.23 a
J7	15.06±0.12 d	0.99±0.02 e	15.09±0.40 d	19.72±0.49 b	6.23±0.17 d

处理 Treatment	TSS/%	TA/%	RTT	FF/N	Fla/(mg·kg^-1)
J0	11.53±0.25 g	1.65±0.02 a	7.01±0.16 g	15.40±0.23 e	5.87±0.14 e
J1	12.90±0.46 f	1.46±0.04 b	8.85±0.37 f	17.35±0.29 cd	6.64±0.19 c
J2	13.93±0.12 e	1.13±0.04 d	12.34±0.53 e	18.17±0.18 c	6.88±0.11 c
J3	15.70±0.36 c	0.91±0.01 f	17.28±0.58 c	19.39±1.03 b	8.15±0.05 a
J4	13.73±0.25 e	1.23±0.03 c	11.14±0.04 e	16.65±0.47 d	5.96±0.03 e
J5	16.83±0.29 b	0.84±0.02 g	20.06±0.84 b	17.85±0.12 c	7.58±0.04 b
J6	17.73±0.25 a	0.82±0.02 g	21.62±1.35 a	22.06±0.48 a	8.33±0.23 a
J7	15.06±0.12 d	0.99±0.02 e	15.09±0.40 d	19.72±0.49 b	6.23±0.17 d

处理 Treatment	各指标的隶属函数值Membership function of indexes
处理 Treatment	TD	VD	SFW	TSS	TA	RTT	FF	Fla	SA
J0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
J1	0.543 2	0.452 0	0.324 1	0.220 9	0.228 9	0.125 9	0.292 8	0.313 1	0.403 5
J2	0.740 6	0.650 9	0.574 9	0.387 0	0.626 5	0.364 8	0.415 9	0.411 4	0.478 7
J3	0.850 1	0.535 2	0.718 6	0.672 5	0.891 5	0.702 9	0.599 0	0.930 5	0.752 6
J4	0.586 4	0.379 7	0.504 5	0.354 8	0.506 0	0.282 6	0.187 7	0.037 5	0.581 2
J5	0.835 7	0.645 5	0.752 2	0.854 8	0.975 9	0.893 2	0.367 8	0.698 8	0.609 2
J6	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0
J7	0.903 4	0.772 1	0.712 5	0.569 3	0.795 1	0.553 0	0.648 6	0.147 3	0.196 1
处理 Treatment	各指标的隶属函数值Membership function of indexes							平均值 Mean		排序 Rank
处理 Treatment	UA	PA	CA	OM	AHN	AP	AK	平均值 Mean		排序 Rank
J0	0	0	0	0	0	0.005 2	0	0.000 3		8
J1	0.454 5	0.505 6	0.699 0	0.280 4	0.265 0	0.362 7	0.294 5	0.360 4		7
J2	0.727 2	0.977 5	0.733 0	0.355 2	0.383 9	0.660 0	0.688 4	0.573 5		5
J3	1.000 0	0.955 0	0.898 0	0.540 1	0.553 5	0.740 9	0.935 9	0.767 3		2
J4	0.727 2	0.471 9	0.563 1	0.267 8	0.440 5	0	0.365 9	0.391 0		6
J5	0.818 1	0.696 6	0.718 4	0.357 2	0.851 2	0.556 5	0.363 7	0.687 2		3
J6	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0		1
J7	0.863 6	0.786 5	0.679 6	0.680 1	0.765 0	0.612 8	0.943 7	0.664 3		4

有机肥配施菌肥对欧李果实品质和土壤性质的影响

Effects of organic fertilizer combined with bacterial fertilizer on fruit quality and soil properties of Cerasus humilis

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 34

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	韦新航, 周铨, 李亚妮, 陈卫良, 毛碧增. 生物有机肥对温郁金根际微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(4): 892-900.
[2]	李腾飞, 杨桂玲, 阮美颖, 褚田芬, 秦华, 邓美华. 不同肥药管理对设施番茄生产系统土壤健康与番茄性状的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(1): 145-158.
[3]	孙鹂, 张淑文, 俞浙萍, 郑锡良, 梁森苗, 任海英, 戚行江. 腐殖酸钾对杨梅土壤改良和生长结实的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(8): 1878-1886.
[4]	朱学慧, 谢辉, 韩守安, 王敏, 白世践, 马云龙, 王艳蒙, 麦斯乐, 潘明启, 张雯. 两种植物生长调节剂对无核白鸡心葡萄果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(6): 1309-1319.
[5]	郑巧巧, 虎陈霞. 农业面源污染多元主体协同治理策略的演化分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(4): 881-893.
[6]	侯栋, 李亚莉, 岳宏忠, 张东琴, 姚拓, 黄书超, 杨海兴. 微生物菌肥替代部分化肥对花椰菜产量、品质及土壤微生物的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(3): 589-599.
[7]	汪颖, 王尖, 冯子珊, 汪宝根, 吴新义, 鲁忠富, 孙玉燕, 董文其, 李国景, 吴晓花. 瓠瓜果实品质性状因子分析和综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 334-343.
[8]	罗莎莎, 王如月, 甄紫怡, 吴嘉龙, 徐业勇, 巴合提牙儿·克热木, 孙雅丽, 虎海防. 灌溉时间和灌溉量对杏李裂果率与果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 365-372.
[9]	马玲, 张镇武, 方英姿, 吴慧欣, 邢承华. 减氮配施生物炭对椪柑生长发育与土壤特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(12): 2739-2747.
[10]	陈钰佩, 单英杰, 陆若辉, 朱伟锋, 孔海民. 浙江省主要作物的施肥现状与减施潜力[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(11): 2566-2574.
[11]	岳宗伟, 李嘉骁, 孙向阳, 刘国梁, 李素艳, 王晨晨, 查贵超, 魏宁娴. 化肥有机肥配施对土壤性质、樱桃果实品质和产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(9): 2192-2201.
[12]	张宁, 陶荣浩, 刘佩诗, 胡含秀, 高琳琳, 郭龙, 祝尊友, 马友华. 不同种类有机肥配施化肥对茶叶生长、品质和土壤肥力的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(8): 1844-1852.
[13]	鲁帅, 罗晓刚, 刘全伟, 张屹, 孟洋昊, 李洁, 张景来. 有机无机复混肥对小麦生长、土壤养分和重金属含量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 922-930.
[14]	冯林, 周铨, 陈卫良, 毛碧增. 防控温郁金细菌性枯萎病的生物有机肥研制与应用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(3): 630-638.
[15]	茹朝, 郁继华, 武玥, 冯致, 缑兆辉, 金宁, 王舒亚, 刘泽慈, 吕剑. 化肥减量配施生物有机肥对露地大白菜产量及品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(8): 1626-1637.