瓠瓜果实品质性状因子分析和综合评价

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230244

浙江农业学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 334-343.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230244

瓠瓜果实品质性状因子分析和综合评价

汪颖(), 王尖, 冯子珊, 汪宝根, 吴新义, 鲁忠富, 孙玉燕, 董文其, 李国景, 吴晓花^*()

浙江省农业科学院蔬菜研究所,浙江杭州 310021

收稿日期:2023-02-28 出版日期:2024-02-25 发布日期:2024-03-05
作者简介:汪颖(1991—),女,安徽亳州人,博士,副研究员,主要研究方向为瓠瓜分子育种。E-mail:wangying@zaas.ac.cn
通讯作者: *吴晓花,E-mail:wuxiaohua2001@126.com
基金资助:
浙江省“尖兵”“领雁”研发攻关计划(2023C02027);浙江省农业(蔬菜)新品种选育重大科技专项(2021C02065);浙江省重点研发计划(2021C02052)

Factor analysis and comprehensive evaluation of the fruit quality of bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria)

WANG Ying(), WANG Jian, FENG Zishan, WANG Baogen, WU Xinyi, LU Zhongfu, SUN Yuyan, DONG Wenqi, LI Guojing, WU Xiaohua^*()

Institute of Vegetables, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China

Received:2023-02-28 Online:2024-02-25 Published:2024-03-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以206份瓠瓜种质资源为试材,测定了其28项品质性状相关指标,并进行了相关性分析、因子分析和聚类分析,建立了基于因子分析的瓠瓜果实品质综合评估模型,并根据综合得分排序了优良度,结合二维排序图,筛选获得高品质种质材料。结果表明:206份瓠瓜种质材料28项果实品质性状指标变异程度不同,变异系数在2.71%~63.60%。变异系数最大的是游离谷氨酸(Glu)含量,变异系数最小的为含水量,不同品质指标间均存在不同程度的相关性。因子分析筛选出9个公因子,累计方差贡献率为86.78%,其中第1公因子的贡献率为38.46%,主要集中于游离氨基酸类。根据相关性分析和聚类分析结果,以指标避免重复和简单易用为原则,将指标简化为肉厚、可溶性固形物含量、硬度、Glu含量、蛋白质含量这5项代表性指标,并综合评估了206份瓠瓜种质材料的果实品质。本研究结果为后续瓠瓜高品质优良品种的选育提供材料和依据。

关键词: 瓠瓜, 果实品质, 因子分析, 代表性指标, 综合评价

Abstract:

The objective of this study was to establish a comprehensive evaluation system for assessing fruit quality in bottle gourd for the purposes of quality evaluation, selection, and breeding. Data on 28 fruit quality related traits were collected from 206 bottle gourd germplasm collections. Correlation analysis, factor analysis, cluster analysis, and two-dimensional ordination mapping were conducted to develop a comprehensive evaluation formula for fruit quality in bottle gourd. The results indicated that the variations in the 28 fruit quality traits were different, ranging from 2.71% to 63.60%. The greatest difference was found in the free glutamate (Glu) content, while the least difference was observed in water content. The correlations among all bottle gourd quality indexes differed depending on the collection. Nine common factors were extracted from bottle gourd quality indexes with an 86.78% cumulative variance contribution rate through factor analysis. The first common factor explained the indices mainly concentrated in free amino acids, with a 38.46% cumulative variance contribution rate. Based on the results of comprehensive analysis and cluster analysis, flesh thickness, soluble solids content, hardness, Glu content, and protein content were selected as typical indices for evaluating the fruit quality of 206 bottle gourd germplasm collections. These findings provide valuable resources and a foundation for breeding high-quality bottle gourd.

Key words: bottle gourd, fruit quality, factor analysis, representative indexes, comprehensive evaluation

中图分类号:

S642

汪颖, 王尖, 冯子珊, 汪宝根, 吴新义, 鲁忠富, 孙玉燕, 董文其, 李国景, 吴晓花. 瓠瓜果实品质性状因子分析和综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 334-343.

WANG Ying, WANG Jian, FENG Zishan, WANG Baogen, WU Xinyi, LU Zhongfu, SUN Yuyan, DONG Wenqi, LI Guojing, WU Xiaohua. Factor analysis and comprehensive evaluation of the fruit quality of bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria)[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(2): 334-343.

图/表 6

参考文献 20

[1]	LEE J M. Cultivation of grafted vegetables I. current status, grafting methods, and benefits[J]. HortScience, 1994, 29(4): 235-239.
[2]	YETISIR H, SARI N. Effect of different rootstock on plant growth, yield and quality of watermelon[J]. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 2003, 43(10): 1269.
[3]	鲍江峰, 夏仁学, 邓秀新, 等. 用主成分分析法选择纽荷尔脐橙品质的评价因素[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2004, 23(6): 663-666.
	BAO J F, XIA R X, DENG X X, et al. The quality evaluation factors selection of of newhall, orange by the principal component analysis[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural, 2004, 23(6): 663-666. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	张海英, 韩涛, 王有年, 等. 桃果实品质评价因子的选择[J]. 农业工程学报, 2006, 22(8): 235-239.
	ZHANG H Y, HAN T, WANG Y N, et al. Selection of factors for evaluating peach(Prunus persica) fruit quality[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2006, 22(8): 235-239. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	张淑文, 梁森苗, 郑锡良, 等. 杨梅优株果实品质的主成分分析及综合评价[J]. 果树学报, 2018, 35(8): 977-986.
	ZHANG S W, LIANG S M, ZHENG X L, et al. Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality in some advanced selections of Chinese bayberry[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2018, 35(8): 977-986. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	冯会丽, 吴正保, 史彦江, 等. 基于因子分析的灰枣优良无性系果实品质评价[J]. 食品科学, 2016, 37(9): 77-81.
	FENG H L, WU Z B, SHI Y J, et al. Fruit quality evaluation of superior clones of Zizyphus jujuba cv. Huizao based on factor analysis[J]. Food Science, 2016, 37(9): 77-81. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	徐强, 刘进生, 陈学好, 等. 加工类型黄瓜品质性状的主成分及聚类分析[J]. 扬州大学学报, 2003, 24(4): 78-81.
	XU Q, LIU J S, CHEN X H, et al. Principal component and cluster analysis of quality characters of pickling cucumber (Cucumis sativus l.)[J]. Journal of Yandzhou University, 2003, 24(4): 78-81. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	WANG X K, XING Y Y. Evaluation of the effects of irrigation and fertilization on tomato fruit yield and quality: a principal component analysis[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7: 350.
[9]	KURTANJEK Z, HORVAT D, MAGDIĆ D, et al. Factor analysis and modelling for rapid quality assessment of Croatian wheat cultivars with different gluten characteristics[J]. Food Technology and Biotechnology, 2008, 46: 270-277.
[10]	CHAÏB J, DEVAUX M F, GROTTE M G, et al. Physiological relationships among physical, sensory, and morphological attributes of texture in tomato fruits[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2007, 58(8): 1915-1925.
[11]	董星光, 田路明, 曹玉芬, 等. 我国南方砂梨主产区主栽品种果实品质因子分析及综合评价[J]. 果树学报, 2014, 31(5): 815-822.
	DONG X G, TIAN L M, CAO Y F, et al. Factor analysis and comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality in cultivars of Pyrus pyrifolia(Burm.f.) Nakai from South China[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2014, 31(5): 815-822. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	樊保国, 李登科. 制干枣品种品质性状的因子分析与综合评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2011, 12(5): 716-720.
	FAN B G, LI D K. Factor analysis and comprehensive assessment on quality characters of dry-jujube cultivars[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2011, 12(5): 716-720. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	古丽尼沙·卡斯木, 木合塔尔·扎热, 张东亚, 等. 基于因子分析的无花果引进品种果实品质性状综合评价[J]. 食品科学, 2018, 39(1): 99-104.
	GULNISA KASIM, MUHTAR ZARI, ZHANG D Y, et al. Factor analysis and comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality traits of introduced fig cultivars[J]. Food Science, 2018, 39(1): 99-104. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	王佳豪, 段雅倩, 乜兰春, 等. ‘羊角脆’类甜瓜果实品质因子分析及综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(24): 4582-4591.
	WANG J H, DUAN Y Q, NIE L C, et al. Factor analysis and comprehensive evaluation of the fruit quality of ‘Yangjiaocui’ melons[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(24): 4582-4591. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	WANG Y, WU X H, LI Y W, et al. Identification and validation of a core single-nucleotide polymorphism marker set for genetic diversity assessment, fingerprinting identification, and core collection development in bottle gourd[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 12: 747940.
[16]	WU X Y, XU P, WU X H, et al. Genome-wide association analysis of free glutamate content, a key factor conferring umami taste in the bottle gourd[Lagenaria siceraria(Mol.) Standl.[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2017, 225: 795-801.
[17]	黄中文. SPSS统计分析与应用[M]. 3版. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2016.
[18]	聂继云, 张红军, 马智勇, 等. 聚类分析在我国果树研究中的应用及问题分析[J]. 果树科学, 2000, 17(2): 128-130.
	NIE J Y, ZHANG H J, MA Z Y, et al. The application of cluster analysis in the fruit research in China and its problems[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2000, 17(2): 128-130. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	闫洪朗, 王康, 何林池, 等. 江苏省甜瓜新品种主要形态性状的遗传多样性及相关性分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(7): 121-124.
	YAN H L, WANG K, HE L C, et al. Phenotypic diversity and correlation analysis of major morphological characters of new melon cultivars in Jiangsu Province[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(7): 121-124. (in Chinese)
[20]	尚建立, 王吉明, 郭琳琳, 等. 甜瓜种质资源果实若干数量性状评价指标探讨[J]. 果树学报, 2013, 30(2): 222-229.
	SHANG J L, WANG J M, GUO L L, et al. Evaluating criteria of some botanical quantitative characters of fruits in melon genetic resources[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2013, 30(2): 222-229. (in Chinese with English abstract)

品质指标Quality index	平均值Average	最大值Max	最小值Min	标准差SD	变异系数CV/%
瓜长Fruit length/cm	26.41	56.33	7.83	10.71	40.56
瓜横径Fruit diameter/cm	6.29	15.00	2.00	2.37	37.61
肉厚Flesh thickness/cm	1.00	2.13	0.47	0.28	28.13
单瓜重Single fruit weight/g	676.09	1650.50	188.33	249.55	36.91
含水量Water content	0.94	0.97	0.73	0.03	2.71
可溶性固形物含量Soluble solids content/%	2.36	6.13	0.23	1.05	44.35
硬度Hardness/N	3.58	11.57	1.03	1.75	48.95
蛋白质含量Protein content/(mg·L^-1)	13.30	23.68	7.02	3.11	23.36
天冬氨酸含量Asp content/(μg·g^-1)	84.41	271.60	23.14	38.27	45.34
苏氨酸含量Thr content/(μg·g^-1)	470.87	990.89	115.39	173.27	36.80
丝氨酸含量Ser content/(μg·g^-1)	50.70	112.78	19.40	17.11	33.75
谷氨酸含量Glu content/(μg·g^-1)	141.32	581.04	25.03	89.88	63.60
甘氨酸含量Gly content/(μg·g^-1)	16.58	44.94	4.93	6.04	36.43
丙氨酸含量Ala content/(μg·g^-1)	48.65	127.25	13.94	19.39	39.85
半胱氨酸含量Cys content/(μg·g^-1)	4.43	17.66	1.00	2.42	54.67
缬氨酸含量Val content/(μg·g^-1)	40.83	103.93	15.11	15.41	37.73
蛋氨酸含量Met content/(μg·g^-1)	7.45	27.98	0.55	3.85	51.70
异亮氨酸含量Ile content/(μg·g^-1)	32.48	66.23	11.81	11.96	36.83
亮氨酸含量Leu content/(μg·g^-1)	37.39	92.20	12.19	14.31	38.28
酪氨酸含量Tyr content/(μg·g^-1)	24.52	75.24	7.51	10.75	43.82
苯丙氨酸含量Phe content/(μg·g^-1)	58.46	163.07	21.39	21.50	36.79
γ-氨基丁酸含量GABA content/(μg·g^-1)	59.00	259.60	10.37	29.20	49.50
赖氨酸含量Lys content/(μg·g^-1)	27.94	75.60	10.22	10.67	38.21
游离氨含量NH₃ content/(μg·g^-1)	15.74	60.64	3.42	7.91	50.26
组氨酸含量His content/(μg·g^-1)	16.49	43.82	5.80	6.69	40.53
精氨酸含量Arg content/(μg·g^-1)	78.55	284.66	20.14	35.94	45.76
脯氨酸含量Pro content/(μg·g^-1)	13.76	42.66	1.90	7.37	53.55
总氨基酸含量Total amino acids content/(μg·g^-1)	1 229.56	2 783.23	447.45	417.14	33.93

品质指标Quality index	平均值Average	最大值Max	最小值Min	标准差SD	变异系数CV/%
瓜长Fruit length/cm	26.41	56.33	7.83	10.71	40.56
瓜横径Fruit diameter/cm	6.29	15.00	2.00	2.37	37.61
肉厚Flesh thickness/cm	1.00	2.13	0.47	0.28	28.13
单瓜重Single fruit weight/g	676.09	1650.50	188.33	249.55	36.91
含水量Water content	0.94	0.97	0.73	0.03	2.71
可溶性固形物含量Soluble solids content/%	2.36	6.13	0.23	1.05	44.35
硬度Hardness/N	3.58	11.57	1.03	1.75	48.95
蛋白质含量Protein content/(mg·L^-1)	13.30	23.68	7.02	3.11	23.36
天冬氨酸含量Asp content/(μg·g^-1)	84.41	271.60	23.14	38.27	45.34
苏氨酸含量Thr content/(μg·g^-1)	470.87	990.89	115.39	173.27	36.80
丝氨酸含量Ser content/(μg·g^-1)	50.70	112.78	19.40	17.11	33.75
谷氨酸含量Glu content/(μg·g^-1)	141.32	581.04	25.03	89.88	63.60
甘氨酸含量Gly content/(μg·g^-1)	16.58	44.94	4.93	6.04	36.43
丙氨酸含量Ala content/(μg·g^-1)	48.65	127.25	13.94	19.39	39.85
半胱氨酸含量Cys content/(μg·g^-1)	4.43	17.66	1.00	2.42	54.67
缬氨酸含量Val content/(μg·g^-1)	40.83	103.93	15.11	15.41	37.73
蛋氨酸含量Met content/(μg·g^-1)	7.45	27.98	0.55	3.85	51.70
异亮氨酸含量Ile content/(μg·g^-1)	32.48	66.23	11.81	11.96	36.83
亮氨酸含量Leu content/(μg·g^-1)	37.39	92.20	12.19	14.31	38.28
酪氨酸含量Tyr content/(μg·g^-1)	24.52	75.24	7.51	10.75	43.82
苯丙氨酸含量Phe content/(μg·g^-1)	58.46	163.07	21.39	21.50	36.79
γ-氨基丁酸含量GABA content/(μg·g^-1)	59.00	259.60	10.37	29.20	49.50
赖氨酸含量Lys content/(μg·g^-1)	27.94	75.60	10.22	10.67	38.21
游离氨含量NH₃ content/(μg·g^-1)	15.74	60.64	3.42	7.91	50.26
组氨酸含量His content/(μg·g^-1)	16.49	43.82	5.80	6.69	40.53
精氨酸含量Arg content/(μg·g^-1)	78.55	284.66	20.14	35.94	45.76
脯氨酸含量Pro content/(μg·g^-1)	13.76	42.66	1.90	7.37	53.55
总氨基酸含量Total amino acids content/(μg·g^-1)	1 229.56	2 783.23	447.45	417.14	33.93

性状Traits	F₁	F₂	F₃	F₄	F₅	F₆	F₇	F₈	F₉
瓜长Fruit length	-0.004	-0.908	0.197	-0.044	-0.013	-0.035	0.160	0.044	-0.127
瓜横径Fruit diameter	-0.124	0.285	-0.829	0.061	-0.050	0.000	-0.058	-0.200	0.038
肉厚Flesh thickness	-0.163	0.108	-0.830	-0.114	0.016	-0.192	-0.087	0.122	-0.168
单瓜重Single fruit weight	-0.329	-0.283	-0.702	0.028	-0.220	-0.125	0.062	-0.080	-0.243
含水量Water content	0.035	0.053	-0.060	-0.078	-0.190	-0.034	0.190	-0.864	-0.225
可溶性固形物含量Soluble solids content	0.090	0.018	0.108	-0.028	0.929	0.076	-0.061	0.145	-0.026
硬度Hardness	0.248	0.350	0.136	0.093	0.144	0.173	-0.193	0.209	0.842
蛋白质含量Protein content	0.141	-0.176	0.087	0.015	-0.068	0.128	0.882	-0.168	-0.055
Asp	0.418	0.065	0.296	0.028	-0.118	-0.122	0.126	0.169	0.520
Thr	0.850	0.052	0.019	0.159	-0.015	-0.026	0.177	-0.139	-0.187
Ser	0.632	0.123	0.193	0.205	0.024	0.096	0.137	0.095	0.221
Glu	0.841	0.283	0.201	0.288	-0.062	-0.053	0.238	0.092	0.361
Gly	0.801	0.282	0.033	0.294	-0.111	0.153	0.080	0.053	-0.055
Ala	0.749	-0.113	0.077	0.183	-0.097	0.240	-0.010	0.125	0.351
Cys	0.311	0.038	0.255	0.014	0.130	0.788	0.192	0.018	0.042
Val	0.850	0.030	0.269	-0.082	0.066	0.133	0.070	0.089	0.339
Met	0.677	0.249	0.064	-0.049	-0.162	0.429	-0.104	0.241	0.118
Ile	0.890	-0.098	0.231	-0.122	0.073	0.042	0.057	-0.038	0.143
Leu	0.838	0.037	0.259	-0.158	0.027	0.160	0.007	0.191	0.331
Tyr	0.771	0.005	0.144	-0.070	0.145	0.343	-0.142	0.148	0.327
Phe	0.754	-0.247	0.126	-0.020	0.215	0.237	-0.196	-0.052	0.322
GABA	0.538	0.010	-0.071	0.223	-0.039	0.224	-0.195	0.133	0.658
Lys	0.625	0.221	0.320	-0.247	-0.009	0.218	0.107	0.360	0.334
NH₃	0.560	0.111	0.055	0.605	-0.060	0.005	0.020	0.097	0.196
His	0.884	-0.044	0.102	0.034	0.160	0.148	-0.044	-0.072	0.238
Arg	0.742	-0.103	0.070	0.080	0.185	-0.106	0.033	-0.052	0.478
Pro	0.480	0.111	0.219	-0.314	-0.142	0.034	0.029	0.400	0.539
总氨基酸含量Total amino acid content	0.913	0.083	0.144	0.160	-0.004	0.040	0.126	0.022	0.258

性状Traits	F₁	F₂	F₃	F₄	F₅	F₆	F₇	F₈	F₉
瓜长Fruit length	-0.004	-0.908	0.197	-0.044	-0.013	-0.035	0.160	0.044	-0.127
瓜横径Fruit diameter	-0.124	0.285	-0.829	0.061	-0.050	0.000	-0.058	-0.200	0.038
肉厚Flesh thickness	-0.163	0.108	-0.830	-0.114	0.016	-0.192	-0.087	0.122	-0.168
单瓜重Single fruit weight	-0.329	-0.283	-0.702	0.028	-0.220	-0.125	0.062	-0.080	-0.243
含水量Water content	0.035	0.053	-0.060	-0.078	-0.190	-0.034	0.190	-0.864	-0.225
可溶性固形物含量Soluble solids content	0.090	0.018	0.108	-0.028	0.929	0.076	-0.061	0.145	-0.026
硬度Hardness	0.248	0.350	0.136	0.093	0.144	0.173	-0.193	0.209	0.842
蛋白质含量Protein content	0.141	-0.176	0.087	0.015	-0.068	0.128	0.882	-0.168	-0.055
Asp	0.418	0.065	0.296	0.028	-0.118	-0.122	0.126	0.169	0.520
Thr	0.850	0.052	0.019	0.159	-0.015	-0.026	0.177	-0.139	-0.187
Ser	0.632	0.123	0.193	0.205	0.024	0.096	0.137	0.095	0.221
Glu	0.841	0.283	0.201	0.288	-0.062	-0.053	0.238	0.092	0.361
Gly	0.801	0.282	0.033	0.294	-0.111	0.153	0.080	0.053	-0.055
Ala	0.749	-0.113	0.077	0.183	-0.097	0.240	-0.010	0.125	0.351
Cys	0.311	0.038	0.255	0.014	0.130	0.788	0.192	0.018	0.042
Val	0.850	0.030	0.269	-0.082	0.066	0.133	0.070	0.089	0.339
Met	0.677	0.249	0.064	-0.049	-0.162	0.429	-0.104	0.241	0.118
Ile	0.890	-0.098	0.231	-0.122	0.073	0.042	0.057	-0.038	0.143
Leu	0.838	0.037	0.259	-0.158	0.027	0.160	0.007	0.191	0.331
Tyr	0.771	0.005	0.144	-0.070	0.145	0.343	-0.142	0.148	0.327
Phe	0.754	-0.247	0.126	-0.020	0.215	0.237	-0.196	-0.052	0.322
GABA	0.538	0.010	-0.071	0.223	-0.039	0.224	-0.195	0.133	0.658
Lys	0.625	0.221	0.320	-0.247	-0.009	0.218	0.107	0.360	0.334
NH₃	0.560	0.111	0.055	0.605	-0.060	0.005	0.020	0.097	0.196
His	0.884	-0.044	0.102	0.034	0.160	0.148	-0.044	-0.072	0.238
Arg	0.742	-0.103	0.070	0.080	0.185	-0.106	0.033	-0.052	0.478
Pro	0.480	0.111	0.219	-0.314	-0.142	0.034	0.029	0.400	0.539
总氨基酸含量Total amino acid content	0.913	0.083	0.144	0.160	-0.004	0.040	0.126	0.022	0.258

样品Sample	Y值Y value	样品Sample	Y值Y value	样品Sample	Y值Y value	样品Sample	Y值Y value
Z-1	40.06	Z-53	-27.63	Z-105	49.83	Z-159	74.37
Z-2	33.34	Z-54	-27.72	Z-106	-25.89	Z-160	69.21
Z-3	6.83	Z-55	-60.12	Z-107	12.92	Z-161	46.97
Z-4	25.47	Z-56	-30.21	Z-108	0.08	Z-163	49.40
Z-5	50.73	Z-57	-61.35	Z-109	51.97	Z-164	-0.32
Z-6	11.23	Z-58	-30.61	Z-110	31.50	Z-165	-50.85
Z-7	-19.55	Z-59	47.07	Z-111	-21.26	Z-166	56.07
Z-8	-20.07	Z-60	10.78	Z-112	16.24	Z-167	8.89
Z-9	11.73	Z-61	-17.89	Z-113	86.32	Z-168	38.45
Z-10	-1.83	Z-62	8.05	Z-115	-27.79	Z-169	40.45
Z-11	53.20	Z-63	37.08	Z-116	34.10	Z-170	-46.07
Z-12	43.96	Z-64	-2.11	Z-117	7.55	Z-171	-9.55
Z-13	15.13	Z-65	-64.46	Z-118	-8.92	Z-172	-31.68
Z-14	-21.80	Z-66	-9.44	Z-119	143.65	Z-173	-3.90
Z-15	89.85	Z-67	7.67	Z-120	43.19	Z-174	-0.12
Z-16	3.64	Z-68	-12.46	Z-121	36.14	Z-175	0.32
Z-17	-27.04	Z-69	-62.57	Z-122	97.71	Z-176	-36.56
Z-18	22.14	Z-70	-2.67	Z-123	-5.38	Z-177	-20.12
Z-19	-20.58	Z-71	-5.82	Z-124	95.44	Z-178	7.25
Z-20	-25.38	Z-72	-7.77	Z-125	60.91	Z-179	26.90
Z-21	21.00	Z-73	-60.53	Z-126	166.76	Z-180	-36.75
Z-22	28.18	Z-74	-31.73	Z-127	142.21	Z-181	-11.67
Z-23	42.87	Z-75	-63.79	Z-128	6.27	Z-182	-30.90
Z-24	2.99	Z-76	-6.41	Z-129	26.63	Z-183	-44.71
Z-25	48.07	Z-77	18.18	Z-130	-13.06	Z-184	-0.75
Z-26	-5.73	Z-78	51.90	Z-131	2.18	Z-185	-50.67
Z-27	-36.14	Z-79	-57.68	Z-132	20.01	Z-186	6.18
Z-28	-38.76	Z-80	-38.73	Z-133	-16.23	Z-187	-7.80
Z-29	-9.24	Z-81	-40.66	Z-134	44.13	Z-188	-29.27
Z-30	17.12	Z-82	-36.26	Z-135	-43.98	Z-189	-38.92
Z-31	5.75	Z-83	-3.16	Z-136	12.17	Z-190	-62.86
Z-32	-38.88	Z-84	-26.40	Z-137	69.63	Z-191	42.34
Z-33	-28.50	Z-85	-45.44	Z-139	-50.96	Z-192	-51.97
Z-34	-31.97	Z-86	-33.86	Z-140	44.67	Z-193	22.47
Z-35	33.06	Z-87	-40.42	Z-141	-30.16	Z-194	-29.94
Z-36	-25.58	Z-88	-50.28	Z-142	-76.31	Z-195	3.70
Z-37	-14.15	Z-89	-35.28	Z-143	-38.07	Z-196	-8.76
Z-38	-68.44	Z-90	30.74	Z-144	38.09	Z-197	75.59
Z-39	-13.25	Z-91	-46.91	Z-145	3.80	Z-198	-40.50
Z-40	-74.50	Z-92	-36.99	Z-146	-15.64	Z-200	-2.07
Z-41	-54.76	Z-93	-53.14	Z-147	-0.58	Z-201	25.12
Z-42	38.22	Z-94	-24.51	Z-148	11.43	Z-202	-29.60
Z-43	-39.83	Z-95	-15.58	Z-149	-34.52	Z-203	-49.73
Z-44	-26.53	Z-96	0.00	Z-150	-30.85	Z-204	-43.06
Z-45	11.46	Z-97	11.77	Z-151	7.15	Z-205	17.89
Z-46	-4.85	Z-98	-14.60	Z-152	53.81	Z-206	50.08

瓠瓜果实品质性状因子分析和综合评价

Factor analysis and comprehensive evaluation of the fruit quality of bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria)

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 20

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	田晓明, 向光锋, 牟村, 吕浩, 马涛, 朱路, 彭静, 张敏, 何艳. 四种红豆属植物耐旱性综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 308-324.
[2]	罗莎莎, 王如月, 甄紫怡, 吴嘉龙, 徐业勇, 巴合提牙儿·克热木, 孙雅丽, 虎海防. 灌溉时间和灌溉量对杏李裂果率与果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 365-372.
[3]	岳宗伟, 李嘉骁, 孙向阳, 刘国梁, 李素艳, 王晨晨, 查贵超, 魏宁娴. 化肥有机肥配施对土壤性质、樱桃果实品质和产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(9): 2192-2201.
[4]	曾小春, 李随成, 史官清, 邢泽宇. “双碳”目标背景下基于熵权TOPSIS法的区域农业高质量发展水平综合评价——基于变化速度特征视角[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 962-972.
[5]	钟丽萍, 王尖, 吴晓花, 汪颖, 吴新义, 汪宝根, 鲁忠富, 王华森, 李国景. 基于MAGIC群体瓠瓜白粉病抗性的全基因组关联分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(10): 2398-2407.
[6]	刘艺平, 张一琪, 苏少文, 刘红利, 贺丹, 孔德政. 不同品种荷花耐盐碱性评价及鉴定指标筛选[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(1): 103-111.
[7]	杨海龙, 王晖, 雷锦超, 蔡金洋. 浙江省早籼稻种质资源的表型多样性分析与评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(8): 1571-1581.
[8]	赵宇洪, 何文, 李根, 王强, 谢锐, 王燕, 陈清, 王小蓉. 四川地区琯溪蜜柚及其芽变品种的果实品质[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(5): 995-1004.
[9]	杨蕾, 洪林, 刘兆俊, 杨海健, 王武. 六个金柑品种果实品质与营养综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(3): 534-547.
[10]	莫言玲, 张文静, 罗亚兰, 曾静, 陈静静, 刘义华. 宽柄芥种质资源农艺性状与营养品质性状鉴定与评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(2): 317-328.
[11]	蔡继业, 房祥军, 韩延超, 丁玉庭, 陈杭君, 吴伟杰, 郜海燕. 气调贮藏对东魁杨梅品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(2): 352-359.
[12]	郝金莲, 杨钰琪, 王茹, 杨梦思, 廖晨宇, 陈虹, 虎海防. 不同采收期对温185和新新2核桃品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(10): 2188-2198.
[13]	吴嘉维, 姚张良, 胡琪琪, 张杰, 陈轶, 蒋建荣, 周国鑫, 王霞. 浙北桐乡梨锈病防治适期和防治药剂研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(9): 1668-1675.
[14]	张志刚, 刘玉芳, 李长城, 李宏, 程平, 杨璐. 不同成熟度对杏果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(8): 1402-1408.
[15]	贺鹏, 张涛, 宋海云, 郑树芳, 覃振师, 谭秋锦, 黄锡云, 汤秀华, 许鹏, 陈海生, 王文林. 适于开口加工澳洲坚果HAES695最佳采收期的确定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(8): 1489-1496.