浙江农业学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (7): 1345-1354.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20250544
收稿日期:2025-08-18
出版日期:2026-07-25
发布日期:2026-08-20
作者简介:张枭坪,研究方向为旱区节水灌溉理论与技术。E-mail:1670575238@qq.com
通讯作者:
*沈晖,E-mail: nxushh@126.com
基金资助:
ZHANG Xiaoping1(
), SHEN Hui1,2,3,4,*(
), ZHANG Jie1
Received:2025-08-18
Published:2026-07-25
Online:2026-08-20
摘要:
为探究旱区育苗日光温室不同种植位置对温室环境、番茄幼苗生长的影响。以番茄品种粉冠503为试验材料,基于东西长、南北宽的覆膜半拱形日光温室开展不同种植位置的番茄幼苗培育试验,利用传感器对温室内环境数据进行采集,分析温室内环境变化规律,测定番茄幼苗的生理生长指标,并使用隶属函数法对不同种植位置的番茄幼苗生长进行综合评价。结果表明,温室中部位置的气温和空气湿度高于四周,光照度呈现东强西弱、南强北弱的特点。长度方向上,中部的基质温度高于东西两侧。跨度方向上,基质温度呈现北强南弱的特点。温室西侧环境利于番茄种子萌发、幼苗生长以及有机物积累;北侧环境利于幼苗有机物积累与根系发育;东侧环境促进幼苗根系生长、抑制地上部生长。根据隶属函数法对幼苗的生长指标综合评价得出,温室北侧幼苗评分最高(0.845)。
中图分类号:
张枭坪, 沈晖, 张杰. 日光温室环境空间异质性对番茄幼苗生长性能的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(7): 1345-1354.
ZHANG Xiaoping, SHEN Hui, ZHANG Jie. Effect of spatial heterogeneity of solar greenhouse environment on the growth performance of tomato seedlings[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(7): 1345-1354.
图1 不同方位传感器位置平面图 数字符号表示气温、空气湿度、基质温度测点位置,大写字母符号表示光照度测点位置,测点1、测点E靠近温室东侧,测点2、测点M靠近温室中部,测点3、测点W靠近温室西侧,测点4、测点S靠近温室南侧,测点5、测点N靠近温室北侧。图2同。
Fig.1 Layout plan of sensors in different positions Numeric symbols represent the measurement positions of temperature, air humidity, and substrate temperature, while uppercase letter symbols represent the measurement positions of illuminance. Points 1 and E are located near the eastern area of the greenhouse, points 2 and M are located near the central area of the greenhouse, points 3 and W are located near the western area of the greenhouse, points 4 and S are located near the southern area of the greenhouse, and measurement points 5 and N are located near the northern area of the greenhouse. The same as Fig. 2.
| 传感器类别 Sensor category | 传感器类型 Sensor type | 量程 Range | 精度 Precision | 生产商 Producer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 气温 Temperature | SM1210B-12 | -30~85 ℃ | ±0.5 ℃ | 徐州法拉电子科技有限责任公司 Xuzhou Fara Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. |
| 空气湿度 Air humidity | SM1210B-12 | 0~100% | ±3% | 徐州法拉电子科技有限责任公司 Xuzhou Fara Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. |
| 光照度 Light illuminance | SM1210B-12 | 0~2 600 μmol· | ±156 μmol· | 徐州法拉电子科技有限责任公司 Xuzhou Fara Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. |
| 基质温度 Substrate temperature | JHT-UP | -40~60 ℃ | ±0.5 ℃ | 成都佳锂科技有限公司 Chengdu JAALEE Technology Co.,Ltd. |
表1 传感器类型、量程及精度
Table 1 Types, ranges and accuracies of sensors
| 传感器类别 Sensor category | 传感器类型 Sensor type | 量程 Range | 精度 Precision | 生产商 Producer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 气温 Temperature | SM1210B-12 | -30~85 ℃ | ±0.5 ℃ | 徐州法拉电子科技有限责任公司 Xuzhou Fara Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. |
| 空气湿度 Air humidity | SM1210B-12 | 0~100% | ±3% | 徐州法拉电子科技有限责任公司 Xuzhou Fara Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. |
| 光照度 Light illuminance | SM1210B-12 | 0~2 600 μmol· | ±156 μmol· | 徐州法拉电子科技有限责任公司 Xuzhou Fara Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. |
| 基质温度 Substrate temperature | JHT-UP | -40~60 ℃ | ±0.5 ℃ | 成都佳锂科技有限公司 Chengdu JAALEE Technology Co.,Ltd. |
| 测点 Point | 气温/℃ Temperature/℃ | 空气湿度/% Air humidity/% | 光照度/(μmol·m-2·s-1) Light illuminance/(μmol·m-2· s-1) | 基质温度/℃ Substrate temperature/℃ | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 最大值 Maximum | 最小值 Minimum | 平均值 Average | 最大值 Maximum | 最小值 Minimum | 平均值 Average | 最大值 Maximum | 最小值 Minimum | 平均值 Average | 最大值 Maximum | 最小值 Minimum | 平均值 Average | |
| 1 | 23.11 | 11.19 | 16.64 | 94.05 | 75.20 | 84.28 | 356.69 | 24.78 | 215.55 | 22.00 | 11.28 | 16.74 |
| 2 | 26.21 | 14.20 | 19.68 | 99.90 | 82.00 | 92.66 | 305.97 | 26.85 | 167.12 | 22.16 | 11.45 | 16.92 |
| 3 | 25.17 | 12.49 | 18.23 | 97.84 | 79.60 | 88.42 | 264.57 | 17.33 | 135.59 | 21.80 | 11.08 | 16.59 |
| 4 | 24.22 | 11.57 | 17.69 | 93.69 | 74.00 | 82.64 | 334.49 | 19.01 | 193.94 | 21.65 | 10.98 | 16.43 |
| 5 | 23.53 | 11.56 | 17.05 | 96.84 | 76.40 | 86.16 | 195.42 | 11.33 | 115.68 | 23.80 | 11.75 | 17.24 |
表2 温室内不同种植位置的环境数据
Table 2 Environmental data at different planting positions in the greenhouse
| 测点 Point | 气温/℃ Temperature/℃ | 空气湿度/% Air humidity/% | 光照度/(μmol·m-2·s-1) Light illuminance/(μmol·m-2· s-1) | 基质温度/℃ Substrate temperature/℃ | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 最大值 Maximum | 最小值 Minimum | 平均值 Average | 最大值 Maximum | 最小值 Minimum | 平均值 Average | 最大值 Maximum | 最小值 Minimum | 平均值 Average | 最大值 Maximum | 最小值 Minimum | 平均值 Average | |
| 1 | 23.11 | 11.19 | 16.64 | 94.05 | 75.20 | 84.28 | 356.69 | 24.78 | 215.55 | 22.00 | 11.28 | 16.74 |
| 2 | 26.21 | 14.20 | 19.68 | 99.90 | 82.00 | 92.66 | 305.97 | 26.85 | 167.12 | 22.16 | 11.45 | 16.92 |
| 3 | 25.17 | 12.49 | 18.23 | 97.84 | 79.60 | 88.42 | 264.57 | 17.33 | 135.59 | 21.80 | 11.08 | 16.59 |
| 4 | 24.22 | 11.57 | 17.69 | 93.69 | 74.00 | 82.64 | 334.49 | 19.01 | 193.94 | 21.65 | 10.98 | 16.43 |
| 5 | 23.53 | 11.56 | 17.05 | 96.84 | 76.40 | 86.16 | 195.42 | 11.33 | 115.68 | 23.80 | 11.75 | 17.24 |
图3 不同位置的番茄出苗率 同一时间柱上无相同小写字母表示不同处理间差异显著(p<0.05)。
Fig.3 Seedling emergence rate of tomato at different positions The absence of identical lowercase letters indicates significant (p<0.05) differences between treatments on the same day.
| 处理 Treatment | 株高/mm Plant height/mm | 茎粗/mm Stem thickness/mm | 叶面积/mm2 Leaf area/mm2 | 叶片数 Number of leaves | SPAD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a组Group a | 79.00±9.61 c | 3.00±0.01 b | 2 914.23±182.25 c | 5.00±0 a | 44.83±4.84 a |
| b组Group b | 80.00±5.29 c | 3.07±0.01 b | 3 036.15±243.36 b | 5.00±0 a | 43.20±3.24 a |
| c组Group c | 95.00±6.25 a | 3.37±0.04 a | 4 520.95±1 056.25 a | 5.00±0 a | 38.03±2.25 b |
| d组Group d | 66.67±4.00 d | 2.67±0.01 c | 2 605.49±139.24 d | 4.00±0 a | 45.68±5.77 a |
| e组Group e | 89.50±6.76 b | 3.20±0.02 ab | 3 067.48±445.21 b | 5.00±0 a | 41.86±2.89 ab |
表3 不同位置的番茄幼苗生长指标
Table 3 Growth traits of tomato seedlings at different positions
| 处理 Treatment | 株高/mm Plant height/mm | 茎粗/mm Stem thickness/mm | 叶面积/mm2 Leaf area/mm2 | 叶片数 Number of leaves | SPAD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a组Group a | 79.00±9.61 c | 3.00±0.01 b | 2 914.23±182.25 c | 5.00±0 a | 44.83±4.84 a |
| b组Group b | 80.00±5.29 c | 3.07±0.01 b | 3 036.15±243.36 b | 5.00±0 a | 43.20±3.24 a |
| c组Group c | 95.00±6.25 a | 3.37±0.04 a | 4 520.95±1 056.25 a | 5.00±0 a | 38.03±2.25 b |
| d组Group d | 66.67±4.00 d | 2.67±0.01 c | 2 605.49±139.24 d | 4.00±0 a | 45.68±5.77 a |
| e组Group e | 89.50±6.76 b | 3.20±0.02 ab | 3 067.48±445.21 b | 5.00±0 a | 41.86±2.89 ab |
图4 不同位置的番茄幼苗鲜重、干重、根冠比、壮苗指数 同一指标下无相同字母的表示处理间差异显著(p<0.05)。
Fig.4 Fresh and dry weight, root and shoot ratio and seedling index of tomato seedlings at different positions The absence of identical lowercase letters indicates significant (p<0.05) difference between treatments under the same index.
| 指标 Index | 主成分1 Principal component 1 | 主成分2 Principal component 2 |
|---|---|---|
| 株高Plant height | 0.408 809 | -0.185 408 |
| 茎粗Stem thickness | 0.405 605 | 0.100 055 |
| 叶面积Leaf area | 0.394 653 | -0.026 533 |
| SPAD | -0.417 120 | 0.162 079 |
| 全株鲜重Fresh weight of whole plant | 0.414 580 | 0.136 257 |
| 全株干重Dry weight of whole plant | 0.344 449 | 0.366 792 |
| 壮苗指数Seedling index | 0.675 714 | 0.003 071 |
| 根冠比Root and shoot ratio | -0.219 290 | 0.564 665 |
| 特征值Eigenvalue | 5 587 000 | 2 185 000 |
| 方差贡献率/%Variance contribution rate/% | 69.843 | 27.312 |
| 累计贡献率/%Cumulative variance contribution rate/% | 69.843 | 97.155 |
| 权重Weight | 0.718 882 | 0.281 118 |
表4 各因子载荷矩阵及累计方差贡献率
Table 4 Load matrix and cumulative variance contribution rate of each factor
| 指标 Index | 主成分1 Principal component 1 | 主成分2 Principal component 2 |
|---|---|---|
| 株高Plant height | 0.408 809 | -0.185 408 |
| 茎粗Stem thickness | 0.405 605 | 0.100 055 |
| 叶面积Leaf area | 0.394 653 | -0.026 533 |
| SPAD | -0.417 120 | 0.162 079 |
| 全株鲜重Fresh weight of whole plant | 0.414 580 | 0.136 257 |
| 全株干重Dry weight of whole plant | 0.344 449 | 0.366 792 |
| 壮苗指数Seedling index | 0.675 714 | 0.003 071 |
| 根冠比Root and shoot ratio | -0.219 290 | 0.564 665 |
| 特征值Eigenvalue | 5 587 000 | 2 185 000 |
| 方差贡献率/%Variance contribution rate/% | 69.843 | 27.312 |
| 累计贡献率/%Cumulative variance contribution rate/% | 69.843 | 97.155 |
| 权重Weight | 0.718 882 | 0.281 118 |
| 处理 Treatment | μ(X1) | μ(X2) | 综合得分 Comprehensive score | 排序 Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a组Group a | 0.462 359 | 0.975 993 | 0.607 | 3 |
| b组Group b | 0.383 882 | 0.081 507 | 0.299 | 4 |
| c组Group c | 1 | 0.07 974 | 0.741 | 2 |
| d组Group d | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| e组Group e | 0.784 438 | 1 | 0.845 | 1 |
表5 不同位置番茄幼苗的综合得分及排序
Table 5 Comprehensive score and ranking of tomato seedlings at different positions
| 处理 Treatment | μ(X1) | μ(X2) | 综合得分 Comprehensive score | 排序 Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a组Group a | 0.462 359 | 0.975 993 | 0.607 | 3 |
| b组Group b | 0.383 882 | 0.081 507 | 0.299 | 4 |
| c组Group c | 1 | 0.07 974 | 0.741 | 2 |
| d组Group d | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| e组Group e | 0.784 438 | 1 | 0.845 | 1 |
| [1] | 王惠, 孙园朝, 刘天翔, 等. 西北地区不同园艺设施类型的发展现状与趋势[J]. 北方园艺, 2024(17): 137-143. |
| Wang H, Sun Y Z, Liu T X, et al. Development status and trend of different types of horticultural facilities in northwest China[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2024(17): 137-143. | |
| [2] | 丁亚会, 张云鹤, 孙宁, 等. 我国设施农业发展的国际经验与启示[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(16): 1-8. |
| Ding Y H, Zhang Y H, Sun N, et al. International experience and enlightenment on development of China’s facility agriculture[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 51(16): 1-8. | |
| [3] | 杨冬艳, 王丹, 桑婷, 等. 日光温室东西垄向栽培小型西瓜品种适应性评价[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2025(5): 97-105. |
| Yang D Y, Wang D, Sang T, et al. Adaptability evaluation of small-fruited watermelon varieties cultivated in east west ridge direction in solar greenhouses[J]. China Vegetables, 2025(5): 97-105. | |
| [4] | 陈思宁, 赵艳霞, 任义方, 等. 基于日光温室黄瓜低温冷害风险的天气指数保险设计[J]. 中国农业气象, 2025, 46(1): 14-22. |
| Chen S N, Zhao Y X, Ren Y F, et al. Weather index insurance design based on low temperature disaster risk of cucumber in solar greenhouse[J]. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2025, 46(1): 14-22. | |
| [5] | 武荣盛, 吴瑞芬, 金林雪, 等. 内蒙古自治区日光温室气候适宜性区划[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1305-1312. |
| Wu R S, Wu R F, Jin L X, et al. Climate suitability division of solar greenhouse in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(5): 1305-1312. | |
| [6] | 范艺然, 刘焕, 闫征南, 等. 春秋分日保温被顶卷对南北向大棚内光照影响的模拟[J]. 中国农业气象, 2021, 42(8): 676-685. |
| Fan Y R, Liu H, Yan Z N, et al. Simulation of influences of thermal insulation quilt top roll on the light environment in the north-south greenhouse on equinox day[J]. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2021, 42(8): 676-685. | |
| [7] | 程陈, 黎贞发, 董朝阳, 等. 日光温室黄瓜和芹菜不同位置消光系数模拟及验证[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(21): 243-252. |
| Cheng C, Li Z F, Dong C Y, et al. Simulation and validation of extinction coefficient at different positions of cucumber and celery in solar greenhouse[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(21): 243-252. | |
| [8] | Cossu M, Murgia L, Ledda L, et al. Solar radiation distribution inside a greenhouse with south-oriented photovoltaic roofs and effects on crop productivity[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 133: 89-100. |
| [9] | 毛尔晔, 张潇丹, 颉建明, 等. 日光温室主动蓄放热系统热过程模拟与参数优化研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(3): 671-680. |
| Mao E Y, Zhang X D, Xie J M, et al. Simulation of thermal processes and optimization of parameters for active heat storage and discharge system in solar greenhouse[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(3): 671-680. | |
| [10] | 许卫猛, 徐妍, 陈国立. 基于多种分析方法的糯玉米品质综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1840-1848. |
| Xu W M, Xu Y, Chen G L. Comprehensive evaluation of waxy corn quality based on various analytical methods[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(9): 1840-1848. | |
| [11] | 赵云霞, 施文艺, 胡慧, 等. 日光温室鲜食番茄品种的筛选与多元化统计分析评价[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2025, 53(7): 180-190. |
| Zhao Y X, Shi W Y, Hu H, et al. Screening, diversified statistical analysis and evaluation of fresh tomato cultivars in solar greenhouse[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 53(7): 180-190. | |
| [12] | 孟鑫, 吕剑, 罗石磊, 等. 不同营养液浓度对日光温室番茄果实品质的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2021(10): 85-90. |
| Meng X, Lyu J, Luo S L, et al. Effects of different nutrient solution concentrations on tomato fruit quality in solar greenhouse[J]. China Vegetables, 2021(10): 85-90. | |
| [13] | 吕欢欢, 牛源艺, 张漫, 等. 日光温室光照强度与空气温湿度变化趋势分析[J]. 农业机械学报, 2021, 52(S1): 410-417. |
| Lyu H H, Niu Y Y, Zhang M, et al. Analysis of variation trend of light intensity and air temperature and humidity in solar greenhouse[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2021, 52(S1): 410-417. | |
| [14] | 李苇, 李惠玲, 王岩. 华南地区两种典型温室环境因子时空分布比较[J]. 北方园艺, 2021(21): 49-54. |
| Li W, Li H L, Wang Y. Comparative on space-time distribution of environmental factors of two types of greenhouse in South China[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2021(21): 49-54. | |
| [15] | 曲佳, 须晖, 王蕊, 等. 日光温室番茄群体太阳总辐射量的分布规律及其与光合作用的关系[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(6): 178-184. |
| Qu J, Xu H, Wang R, et al. Solar radiation distribution and relationship between solar radiation and photosynthesis of tomato canopy in solar greenhouse[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University(Natural Science Edition), 2011, 39(6): 178-184. | |
| [16] | 孙志凌, 曹青, 张汉辰, 等. 宁夏地区雨季特征时空变化规律及其归因分析[J]. 人民长江, 2022, 53(9): 64-71. |
| Sun Z L, Cao Q, Zhang H C, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution of rainy season characteristics and their causes in Ningxia Region[J]. Yangtze River, 2022, 53(9): 64-71. | |
| [17] | 张晨阳. 不同产地的椰糠对几种蔬菜出苗率的影响[J]. 现代园艺, 2023, 46(24): 1-2. |
| Zhang C Y. Effects of coco peat from different origins on the seedling emergence rate of several vegetables[J]. Contemporary Horticulture, 2023, 46(24): 1-2. | |
| [18] | 吕赢, 迟翔丹, 王越, 等. 不同配比蚯蚓粪基质对黄瓜幼苗的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2025(5): 48-55. |
| Lyu Y, Chi X D, Wang Y, et al. Effects of different ratios of vermicompost substrates on cucumber seedlings[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2025(5): 48-55. | |
| [19] | 叶选, 张继红, 陈心韵, 等. 基于模糊隶属函数算法评估水生植物净化污水能力[J]. 江西科学, 2023, 41(3): 449-454. |
| Ye X, Zhang J H, Chen X Y, et al. The fuzzy membership function algorithm was applied to evaluate the ability of aquatic plants to purify sewage[J]. Jiangxi Science, 2023, 41(3): 449-454. | |
| [20] | 万清, 杨小渔, 吴丹, 等. 沙棘果渣还田对水稻土性质、温室气体排放和微生物数量的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2022, 48(4): 483-492. |
| Wan Q, Yang X Y, Wu D, et al. Effects of returning seabuckthorn fruit residue into field on paddy soil properties, greenhouse gas emissions and microbial numbers[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University(Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2022, 48(4): 483-492. | |
| [21] | Spaninks K, Lamers G, van Lieshout J, et al. Light quality regulates apical and primary radial growth of Arabidopsis thaliana and Solanum lycopersicum[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2023, 317: 112082. |
| [22] | 张芳, 王佩欣, 何勇, 等. 基于物联网的阳台微型温室作物生长环境因子探究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(2): 234-242. |
| Zhang F, Wang P X, He Y, et al. Study on crop growth environment factors in mini-greenhouse in balcony based on Internet of Things[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2020, 32(2): 234-242. | |
| [23] | 刘琦, 塔娜, 焦巍, 等. 日光温室作物冠层温湿度时空分布及预测模型[J]. 北方园艺, 2019(17): 56-65. |
| Liu Q, Ta N, Jiao W, et al. Spatial temporal distribution and prediction model of canopy temperature and humidity in greenhouse[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2019(17): 56-65. | |
| [24] | 王璐, 朱进, 彭玉全, 等. 春季晴天塑料大棚内不同位置小气候变化分析[J]. 长江大学学报(自科版), 2018, 15(2): 19-21. |
| Wang L, Zhu J, Peng Y Q, et al. Analysis of climate change of sunny day in the plastic shed during spring[J]. Journal of Yangtze University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 15(2): 19-21. | |
| [25] | 范方华, 王璐, 朱进, 等. 春季阴天塑料大棚内不同位置环境变化规律[J]. 长江大学学报(自科版), 2018, 15(6): 7-9. |
| Fan F H, Wang L, Zhu J, et al. Variation of environment in different positions of plastic shed in overcast days in spring[J]. Journal of Yangtze University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 15(6): 7-9. | |
| [26] | 乐章燕, 石茗化, 魏渠成, 等. 大长度日光温室东西方向的温度变化特征[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2022, 50(8): 94-102. |
| Le Z Y, Shi M H, Wei Q C, et al. Temperature variation characteristics in east-west direction of solar greenhouse with large length[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(8): 94-102. | |
| [27] | 赵建贵, 李志伟, 王文俊, 等. 日光温室番茄种植环境参数时空分布测试与分析[J]. 山西农业科学, 2019, 47(12): 2172-2176. |
| Zhao J G, Li Z W, Wang W J, et al. Spatial and temporal distribution test and analysis of tomato planting environment parameters in solar greenhouse[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(12): 2172-2176. | |
| [28] | 于明英, 肖娟, 邱照宁, 等. 不同天气条件对沙培日光温室小气候的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2017(9): 42-45. |
| Yu M Y, Xiao J, Qiu Z N, et al. Effect of different weather conditions on microclimate of sand cultured solar greenhouse[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2017(9): 42-45. | |
| [29] | 庞敏晖, 左强, 邹国元, 等. 日光温室不同种植位置温光变化及对结球生菜产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(34): 38-43. |
| Pang M H, Zuo Q, Zou G Y, et al. The variation of temperature and light at different planting locations in solar greenhouse and its effect on lettuce yield[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(34): 38-43. | |
| [30] | 孙世宇, 范海燕, 刘洪禄, 等. 基于主成分分析的温室白萝卜水氮耦合效应[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2024, 52(5): 159-165. |
| Sun S Y, Fan H Y, Liu H L, et al. Water-nitrogen coupling effect of greenhouse white radish based on principal component analysis[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 52(5): 159-165. | |
| [31] | 张红丽, 南伟, 张卫华, 等. 黄沙在温室黄瓜育苗中的基质化利用效果[J]. 蔬菜, 2025(8): 46-56. |
| Zhang H L, Nan W, Zhang W H, et al. Substrate utilization effect of yellow sand on cucumber seedling raising in greenhouse[J]. Vegetables, 2025(8): 46-56. |
| [1] | 孙勤, 雷永忠, 金宁, 金莉, 王舒亚, 张倩, 张威, 赵旺, 郁继华, 吕剑. 不同地面覆盖方式对日光温室内二氧化碳浓度与番茄生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(4): 643-654. |
| [2] | 肖毓淼, 马巧梅, 张思法, 何勇, 赵振卿. 鱼蛋白水解物对番茄幼苗生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(12): 2504-2515. |
| [3] | 杨蕾, 洪林, 刘兆俊, 杨海健, 王武. 六个金柑品种果实品质与营养综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(3): 534-547. |
| [4] | 任倩倩, 孙纪霞, 张德顺, 丁兆堂, 张英杰, 张京伟. 干旱胁迫下不同绣球品种生理响应与抗旱性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(10): 1852-1860. |
| [5] | 杨亚娜, 樊小雪, 徐刚, 张宇, 李亚灵, 温祥珍. 不同红蓝LED光照强度和灌溉量交互作用对番茄幼苗生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(5): 737-745. |
| [6] | 郭彦宏, 张晶星, 杨永娟, 陈俊通, 孙明, 廖晶. 六种野生广义菊属植物对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(8): 1349-1354. |
| [7] | 于明月, 王立地, 栗庆吉, 李亚迪, 吕亭辉. 基于ZigBee的日光温室智能调控系统的研究与设计[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(6): 1026-1036. |
| [8] | 李春兰, 杨永花, 杨振坤, 王金秋, 廖伟彪. 五个观赏海棠品种抗旱性比较[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(5): 782-790. |
| [9] | 祁娟霞, 韦峰,董艳,张亚红*. 不同补光时间对日光温室甜瓜生长发育的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(6): 979-. |
| [10] | 吴炳龙;徐志豪;*;张成浩;寿伟松;董文其;雷娟利. 南方日光温室的结构、环境特点及应用效果[J]. , 2010, 22(6): 848-853. |
| [11] | 宋文;张玉龙*;党秀丽;王娇;韩巍. 渗灌条件下保护地黄瓜不同生育期适宜灌水定额[J]. , 2010, 22(2): 0-192. |
| [12] | 许桂芳;张朝阳;向佐湘 . 利用隶属函数法对4种珍珠菜属过路黄抗旱性的综合评价[J]. , 2009, 21(1): 0-62. |
| [13] | 金志凤;周胜军;朱育强;袁德辉;冯涛 . 不同天气条件下日光温室内温度和相对湿度的变化特征[J]. , 2007, 19(3): 0-191. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||