›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 317-326.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2020.02.16

• Environmental Science • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparative analysis of water quality factors and phytoplankton communities in two different aquaculture models

ZHANG Leiming1,2, YUAN Julin2, NI Meng2, LIU Mei2, GUO Aihuan2, LIAN Qingping2, WANG Haiyang2, GU Zhimin1,2,*   

  1. 1.College of Fisheries and Life Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Healthy Freshwater Aquaculture of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhejiang Institute of Freshwater Fishries, Huzhou 313001, China
  • Received:2019-06-17 Online:2020-02-25 Published:2020-03-13

Abstract: In order to reveal the biodiversity of phytoplankton in IPA model and traditional aquaculture ponds, water quality and phytoplankton communities were monitored. The results showed that 64 phytoplankton species were identified in the IPA model, and 49 phytoplankton species were identified in the traditional aquaculture pond, and the average density and biomass of phytoplankton in the IPA model were 113.55×106 ind·L-1 and 52.79 mg·L-1, which were higher than the 78.37×106 ind·L-1 and 23.22 mg·L-1 in the traditional aquaculture pond. The mean values of Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H') and Margalef diversity index (D) in IPA mode were 3.80 and 2.25 respectively, which were higher than those in the traditional aquaculture pond. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) showed that water temperature, potassium permanganate index, total nitrogen, total phosphorus and total organic carbon were the main driving factors affecting phytoplankton in IPA mode; total nitrogen, total phosphorus, total ammonia nitrogen and nitrite nitrogen were the main driving factors affecting phytoplankton in the traditional aquaculture pond.

Key words: internal-circulation pond aquaculture, phytoplankton, canonical correspondence analysis

CLC Number: