Study on ecological service benefits of urban greenway based on i-Tree model

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2020.12.11

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 2201-2210.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2020.12.11

• Environmental Science • Previous Articles Next Articles

Study on ecological service benefits of urban greenway based on i-Tree model

ZHOU Beining(), LU Jianguo^*(), HUA Zhuangzhuang

College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

Received:2020-07-16 Online:2020-12-25 Published:2020-12-25
Contact: LU Jianguo

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to quantitatively analyze the value of various ecological services of trees in urban greenways, and provide reference for tree species selection and planting planning in the future. By taking the greenway tree species in “The River Junction Area” of Ningbo City as the research object, the composition of tree community structure, diameter at breast height (DBH) distribution, tree height structure, and growth type were analyzed. The ecological benefits were evaluated by using i-Tree model, and energy-saving benefit, carbon sequestration benefit, air quality improvement benefit, rainwater interception benefit and aesthetic benefit were quantified as economic values. The results showed that there were abundant tree species in the greenway (71 species, 54 genera and 37 families), and the growth types were mostly broad-leaved deciduous trees. The DBH and height of greenway trees were mostly between 15.2-30.5 cm and 5.0-10.0 m, which were in stable growth stage, with abundant seasonal changes and strong landscape effect. According to i-Tree model, the annual total ecological benefit of greenway in “The River Junction Area” is 4 287 024.54 yuan, including aesthetic benefit (64.62%)>carbon sequestration benefit (17.25%)>rainwater interception benefit (9.79%)>energy saving benefit (8.32%)>air quality improvement benefit (0.02%). There was a strong correlation between the dominance of tree species and the total ecological benefit contribution rate of greenway. The contribution rate of Cinnamomum camphora, Ginkgo biloba, Salix babylonica and Acer palmatum were the highest, but there were no strong correlation with the annual ecological benefit of individual tree; Paulownia fortune(2 494.70 yuan per tree) , Platanus acerifolia(1 994.49 yuan per tree), Pterocarya stenoptera(1 824.93 yuan per tree) and Camptotheca acuminata(1 542.23 yuan per tree) had higher ecological benefits per plant, but the numbers of them were not dominant in the greenway. It was suggested that plant volatile organic compounds (BVOC) should be included in the evaluation system of air quality improvement, and tree species with higher ecological benefit value should be applied to greenway.

Key words: i-Tree model, greenway, ecological benefit, quantitative evaluation

CLC Number:

ZHOU Beining, LU Jianguo, HUA Zhuangzhuang. Study on ecological service benefits of urban greenway based on i-Tree model[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2020, 32(12): 2201-2210.

Figures/Tables 6

References 31

[1]	陈福妹. 绿道网络的生态环境功能及规划策略研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2011.
	CHEN F M. Study on the ecological environmental functions and planning strategy of greenways[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2011.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	肖燃, 邓壹心. 基于生态功能评价的绿道规划研究[ C]//中国城市规划学会、杭州市人民政府. 共享与品质——2018中国城市规划年会论文集, 2018: 276-283.
[3]	顾浩, 胡智清, 马敏, 等. 山水为基, 人文为魂, 特色为本: 浙江绿道规划实践与探索[J]. 城市发展研究, 2013,20(4):22-27.
	GU H, HU Z Q, MA M, et al. Landscape as the base, humanity as the soul, characteristic as the root: the practice and exploration of Zhejiang greenway plan[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2013,20(4):22-27.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	张雨朦. 城市道路景观生态服务功能综合价值评估研究[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2015.
	ZHANG Y M. Evaluation on comprehensive benefit of urban road ecosystem services fuction a case study on Tianxin district, Hunan Province[D]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2015.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	饶虹霞. 嘉兴市区生态绿道网络的规划建设现状及对策研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学, 2016.
	RAO H X. Research on current situation and countermeasure of Jiaxing ecological greenway network planning and construction[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang A & F University, 2016.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	鲁敏, 赵鹏, 王菲, 等. 城市绿道综合效能评价研究: 以济南市为例[J]. 山东建筑大学学报, 2016,31(2):109-118.
	LU M, ZHAO P, WANG F, et al. Research on comprehensive effectiveness evaluation of city green way: a case study on Jinan City[J]. Journal of Shandong Jianzhu University, 2016,31(2):109-118.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	何俊勇. 广州市绿道工程效益评估[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2014.
	HE J Y. The benefit evaluation of green-way construction in Guangzhou City[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2014.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	赖伯舟. 增城市绿道网项目建设及效益评估研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2010.
	LAI B Z. The study of Zengcheng greenway network project construction and benefit assessment[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2010.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	魏云龙. 杭州花港观鱼公园生态服务功能价值评估研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学, 2017.
	WEI Y L. Study on the evaluation of ecological service function value of Hangzhou Huagangguanyu Park[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang A & F University, 2017.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	包峻州, 周长威. 基于i-Tree模型的贵阳市行道树组成与生态服务功能研究[J]. 防护林科技, 2018(11):4-9.
	BAO J Z, ZHOU C W. Compositon of street tree in Guiyang City and its ecological service function based on i-Tree model[J]. Protection Forest Science and Technology, 2018(11):4-9.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	刘朋朋, 蔡建国, 章毅, 等. 基于i-Tree模型的杭州市环西湖景区行道树生态效益分析[J]. 科技通报, 2019,35(2):132-137.
	LIU P P, CAI J G, ZHANG Y, et al. Ecological benefits of street trees in ring the West Lake of Hangzhou City based on i-Tree model[J]. Bulletin of Science and Technology, 2019,35(2):132-137.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	熊金鑫, 祁慧君, 王倩茹, 等. 基于i-Tree模型的城市小区行道树生态效益评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019,43(2):128-136.
	XIONG J X, QI H J, WANG Q R, et al. Assessment of ecological benefit of street trees in urban community based on i-Tree model[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2019,43(2):128-136.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	郭树煌, 李晓鹏, 梁龙锋, 等. 基于i-Tree模型的湛江市行道树冠层截留雨水效益分析[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2020,35(2):244-251.
	GUO S H, LI X P, LIANG L F, et al. Beneficial analysis of rainwater interception by street trees in Zhanjiang City based on i-Tree model[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2020,35(2):244-251.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	王颖, 蔡建国, 张哲琪, 等. 杭州临安钱王陵公园植物群落的美学效益[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2020,61(4):723-727.
	WANG Y, CAI J G, ZHANG Z Q, et al. Aesthetic benefits of plant communities in Qianwangling Park, Lin’an, Hangzhou[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020,61(4):723-727.(in Chinese)
[15]	李兴兴. 基于i-Tree tools的城市小区森林结构和效益的研究[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2012.
	LI X X. The research of urban district forest structure and function based on i-Tree tools: a case in Sichuan Agricultural University Dujiangyan Campus[D]. Ya’an: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2012.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	陶晓, 吴泽民, 郝焰平. 合肥市行道树生态效益研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009,25(3):75-82.
	TAO X, WU Z M, HAO Y P. Study on ecological benefits of street trees in Hefei City[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2009,25(3):75-82.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	浙江省对石油化工及包装印刷行业开征VOCs排污费[J]. 中国氯碱, 2016(5):47.
	Zhejiang Province imposed VOCs sewage charges on petrochemical industry and packaging printing industry[J]. China Chlor-Alkali, 2016(5):47. (in Chinese)
[18]	宋晓程, 刘京, 林姚宇, 等. 城市局地热气候预测及热岛效应缓解策略[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2015,47(2):25-30.
	SONG X C, LIU J, LIN Y Y, et al. Regional thermal climate prediction and mitigation strategy of local urban heat island[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2015,47(2):25-30.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	王如松. 城市生态服务[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2004.
[20]	HEISLER G M. Energy savings with trees[J]. Journal of Arboriculture, 1986,12(5):11-14.
[21]	张倩倩. 植树固碳效益在居住区规划设计中的应用研究[D]. 邯郸: 河北工程大学, 2012.
	ZHANG Q Q. Application research on carbon removal benefits of tree-planting in residential district planning[D]. Handan: Hebei University of Engineering, 2012.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	左海军, 王彦辉, 于澎涛, 等. 绿化植物防治空气颗粒物污染研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2016,29(2):33-37.
	ZUO H J, WANG Y H, YU P T, et al. Overview of studies on greening plants effects on particulate air pollution control[J]. World Forestry Research, 2016,29(2):33-37.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	王金南, 蒋洪强, 刘年磊. 关于国家环境保护“十三五”规划的战略思考[J]. 中国环境管理, 2015,7(2):1-7.
	WANG J N, JIANG H Q, LIU N L. Strategic ideas on the 13th five-year plan of national environmental protection[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 2015,7(2):1-7.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	侯丹莉, 路洋, 郭阳, 等. 大气中植物释放挥发性有机物的研究[ C]//吉林省科学技术协会. 创新驱动, 加快战略性新兴产业发展—吉林省第七届科学技术学术年会论文集, 2012: 2.
[25]	杨清. 煤矿复垦区绿化树种固碳释氧、降温增湿效应研究[D]. 淮南: 安徽理工大学, 2013.
	YANG Q. Study on carbon-fixing, oxygen-releasing, temperature-reducing, and humidity-increasing effects of green tree species in coal mine reclaimed soil: take Datong Wetland Park for example[D]. Huainan: Anhui University of Science & Technology, 2013.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	江胜利. 杭州地区常见园林绿化植物滞尘能力研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学, 2012.
	JIANG S L. The common green plants in landscape architecture and the study on its dust retention capacity in Hangzhou[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang A & F University, 2012.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	解莹然. 北京地区吸附大气多环芳烃树种筛选[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2017.
	XIE Y R. The tree species selection according to the absorption of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Beijing[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2017.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	李一川, 刘厚田, 马良清, 等. 重庆某些树种对SO₂的耐性和净化能力的研究[J]. 环境科学, 1990,11(3):20-23.
	LI Y C, LIU H T, MA L Q, et al. Tolerance and purification capacity of some species of trees against sulfur dioxide[J]. Environmental Science, 1990,11(3):20-23.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	王茜, 杜万光, 王晓磊. I-Trees模型在城市绿地生态服务功能评估中的应用探索研究[J]. 山东林业科技, 2018,48(6):77-81.
	WANG Q, DU W G, WANG X L. Study on application of i-Trees model in the evaluation of ecological service functions of urban greenland[J]. Journal of Shandong Forestry Science and Technology, 2018,48(6):77-81.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	马宁, 何兴元, 石险峰, 等. 基于i-Tree模型的城市森林经济效益评估[J]. 生态学杂志, 2011,30(4):810-817.
	MA N, HE X Y, SHI X F, et al. Assessment of urban forest economic benefits based on i-Tree mode[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2011,30(4):810-817.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	李春晖, 刘颂, 周腾, 等. 美国景观绩效系列(LPS)工具应用进展[ C]//中国风景园林学会. 中国风景园林学会2016年会论文集, 2016: 31-36.

生态服务效益 Ecological benefit	影响因子 Impact factor	计算方法 Computing method	基价 Basic price
节能效益 Energy saving benefit	叶面积指数 Leaf area index 树冠覆盖度 Canopy coverage	基于降低或增加与树木群落相同温度所消耗的电量和天然气量 Amount of electricity and gas consumed based on the reduce or increase the same temperature as the tree community	电费 Electricity price 天然气价 Natural gas price
固碳效益 CO₂ sequestration benefit	胸径分布 Distribution of DBH 树冠覆盖度 Canopy coverage 树木生长状况 Tree growth condition	基于直接碳储存和间接碳减排相同二氧化碳量所征收的碳税 A carbon tax based on the same amount of carbon dioxide from direct carbon storage and indirect carbon emissions	碳税 Carbon tax
改善空气质量效益 Improving air quality benefit	树种 Tree species 树冠覆盖度 Canopy coverage	基于直接吸收、间接减排和BVOC排放相同大气污染物量所征收的税额 A pollutants tax based on direct absorption, indirect emission reduction and BVOC emission of the same amount of air pollutants	大气污染税额 Air pollutants tax
截留雨水效益 Rainwater interception benefit	年降水量 Annual precipitation 叶面积指数 Leaf area index 树冠覆盖度 Canopy coverage	基于树冠直接截留、间接保护水质和防洪相同雨水量所投入的政府每年用于暴雨和水土流失治理的资金 Annual government spending on rainstorms and erosion control based on direct canopy interception, indirect water quality protection and flood control	政府雨水管理资金 Government storm-management fund
美学价值 Aesthetic benefit	区位因素 Locational factor 树种 Tree species 树木生长状况 Tree growth condition	基于所处区位、树木年叶面积增长所提高周边房屋销售价格 Increase the selling price of surrounding houses based on the location and annual leaf area growth of trees	城市二手房均价 Average price of second-hand house

生态服务效益 Ecological benefit	影响因子 Impact factor	计算方法 Computing method	基价 Basic price
节能效益 Energy saving benefit	叶面积指数 Leaf area index 树冠覆盖度 Canopy coverage	基于降低或增加与树木群落相同温度所消耗的电量和天然气量 Amount of electricity and gas consumed based on the reduce or increase the same temperature as the tree community	电费 Electricity price 天然气价 Natural gas price
固碳效益 CO₂ sequestration benefit	胸径分布 Distribution of DBH 树冠覆盖度 Canopy coverage 树木生长状况 Tree growth condition	基于直接碳储存和间接碳减排相同二氧化碳量所征收的碳税 A carbon tax based on the same amount of carbon dioxide from direct carbon storage and indirect carbon emissions	碳税 Carbon tax
改善空气质量效益 Improving air quality benefit	树种 Tree species 树冠覆盖度 Canopy coverage	基于直接吸收、间接减排和BVOC排放相同大气污染物量所征收的税额 A pollutants tax based on direct absorption, indirect emission reduction and BVOC emission of the same amount of air pollutants	大气污染税额 Air pollutants tax
截留雨水效益 Rainwater interception benefit	年降水量 Annual precipitation 叶面积指数 Leaf area index 树冠覆盖度 Canopy coverage	基于树冠直接截留、间接保护水质和防洪相同雨水量所投入的政府每年用于暴雨和水土流失治理的资金 Annual government spending on rainstorms and erosion control based on direct canopy interception, indirect water quality protection and flood control	政府雨水管理资金 Government storm-management fund
美学价值 Aesthetic benefit	区位因素 Locational factor 树种 Tree species 树木生长状况 Tree growth condition	基于所处区位、树木年叶面积增长所提高周边房屋销售价格 Increase the selling price of surrounding houses based on the location and annual leaf area growth of trees	城市二手房均价 Average price of second-hand house

树种 Species	吸收量 Absorption/ kg	间接减排量 Indirect release/kg	分解代谢释放量 Decomposed release/kg	呼吸释放量 Respiratory release/kg	净吸收量 Net absorption/ kg	总效益 Total benefit/ Yuan	单株平均效益 Average benefit per tree/Yuan
泡桐Paulownia fortunei	1 531	2 021	-305	-14	3 233	3 345.77	371.48
樟树Cinnamomum camphora	168 757	92 004	-7915	-844	252 002	260 618.43	259.04
三角槭Acer buergerianum	1 177	632	-52	-6	1 750	1 807.41	258.62
构树Broussonetia papyrifera	1 727	1 360	-157	-13	2 917	3 014.64	251.45
枫杨Pterocarya stenoptera	3 288	3 760	-455	-29	6 564	6 788.12	251.45
苦楝Melia azedarach	1 076	761	-52	-8	1 777	1 835.00	204.26
喜树Camptotheca acuminata	1 432	1 423	-112	-12	2 731	2 821.49	201.78
二球悬铃木Platanus acerifolia	791	1 008	-38	-8	1 753	1 814.31	201.44
雪松Cedrus deodara	429	326	-21	-4	730	751.94	188.74
柳树Salix babylonica	40 129	27 533	-2 228	-291	65 143	67 370.75	185.09

树种 Species	吸收量 Absorption/ kg	间接减排量 Indirect release/kg	分解代谢释放量 Decomposed release/kg	呼吸释放量 Respiratory release/kg	净吸收量 Net absorption/ kg	总效益 Total benefit/ Yuan	单株平均效益 Average benefit per tree/Yuan
泡桐Paulownia fortunei	1 531	2 021	-305	-14	3 233	3 345.77	371.48
樟树Cinnamomum camphora	168 757	92 004	-7915	-844	252 002	260 618.43	259.04
三角槭Acer buergerianum	1 177	632	-52	-6	1 750	1 807.41	258.62
构树Broussonetia papyrifera	1 727	1 360	-157	-13	2 917	3 014.64	251.45
枫杨Pterocarya stenoptera	3 288	3 760	-455	-29	6 564	6 788.12	251.45
苦楝Melia azedarach	1 076	761	-52	-8	1 777	1 835.00	204.26
喜树Camptotheca acuminata	1 432	1 423	-112	-12	2 731	2 821.49	201.78
二球悬铃木Platanus acerifolia	791	1 008	-38	-8	1 753	1 814.31	201.44
雪松Cedrus deodara	429	326	-21	-4	730	751.94	188.74
柳树Salix babylonica	40 129	27 533	-2 228	-291	65 143	67 370.75	185.09

树种 Species	生长类型 Growth type	单株生态效益Ecological benefit per tree/Yuan					单株平均生态效益 Average ecological benefit per tree/Yuan	平均胸径 Average DBH/cm
树种 Species	生长类型 Growth type	节能效益 Energy saving	固碳效益 Carbon sequestration	改善空气效益 Improve air quality	截留雨水效益 Retention of stormwater	美学效益 Aesthetic	单株平均生态效益 Average ecological benefit per tree/Yuan	平均胸径 Average DBH/cm
泡桐Paulownia fortunei	BDL	257.66	371.48	3.17	442.61	1 419.78	2 494.70	62.93
二球悬铃木	BDL	132.18	201.44	0.28	160.11	1 500.49	1 994.49	36.93
Platanus acerifolia
枫杨	BDL	162.32	251.45	1.93	242.90	1 166.33	1 824.93	45.21
Pterocarya stenoptera
喜树	BDL	121.48	201.78	1.45	153.70	1 063.82	1 542.23	37.62
Camptotheca acuminata
三角槭	BDM	111.55	258.62	1.17	116.93	940.20	1 428.47	41.22
Acer buergerianum
樟树	BEM	103.62	259.04	-1.72	156.46	903.01	1 420.40	36.28
Cinnamomum camphora
榉树Zelkova serrata	BDL	102.65	176.12	1.24	121.76	994.83	1 396.60	30.67
枫香	BDL	46.43	89.47	-0.34	41.74	1 035.46	1 212.76	29.02
Liquidambar formosana
构树	BDM	134.24	251.45	1.79	165.70	651.15	1 204.34	42.01
Broussonetia papyrifera
雪松Cedrus deodara	CEL	95.82	188.74	-1.93	122.31	711.24	1 116.18	45.07

Study on ecological service benefits of urban greenway based on i-Tree model

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 31

Related Articles 2

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	ZHOU Beining, LU Jianguo, HUA Zhuangzhuang. Study on ecological service benefits of urban greenway based on i-Tree model [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2020, 32(12): 2201-2210.
[2]	JIANG Ping;LIU Yong;*. Simulation and forecast of farmland microclimate based on BP neural network of forestry project [J]. , 2013, 25(2): 0-364.