Land suitability evaluation of citrus cultivation based on fuzzy mathematics

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.01.17

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 141-152.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.01.17

• Environmental Science • Previous Articles Next Articles

Land suitability evaluation of citrus cultivation based on fuzzy mathematics

XI Wenyong(), FU Peihong^*()

College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China

Received:2021-03-03 Online:2022-01-25 Published:2022-02-05
Contact: FU Peihong

Abstract

Abstract:

This study introduces fuzzy mathematics theory into the land suitability evaluation for citrus planting.By taking Tongshan County in Hubei Province as an example, 207 soil sample points were collected from local agricultural land, and climate, soil and topographic data were converted into fuzzy membership data.Then, the analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy mathematics method in the ArcGIS software environment were combined, and a suitability evaluation model of citrus planting land containing 15 indicators was established. The results showed that 26.94% (652.37 km²), 32.85% (795.51 km²), 23.14% (560.42 km²) and 17.07% (413.40 km²) of the land in this area were highly suitable, moderately suitable, marginally suitable and not suitable for citrus production, respectively. The research results were consistent with the actual production, indicating that the established research methods were feasible and could provide references for improving land utilization efficiency and better guiding citrus production.

Key words: Tongshan County, fuzzy mathematics, citrus, suitability evaluation

CLC Number:

S-03
P964

XI Wenyong, FU Peihong. Land suitability evaluation of citrus cultivation based on fuzzy mathematics[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(1): 141-152.

Figures/Tables 11

References 24

[1]	邓秀新, 彭抒昂. 柑橘学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2013.
[2]	赵祖华, 华琦孜, 李陶桂, 等. 广西全州县柑橘种植的气候适宜性分析及区划[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2013, 41(35): 13496-13497.
	ZHAO Z H, HUA Q Z, LI T G, et al. Climatic suitability analysis and regionalization of citrus planting in Quanzhou County, Guangxi Province[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 41(35): 13496-13497.(in Chinese)
[3]	Land and Water Development Division, FAO. A framework for land evaluation[R]. Rome, Italy: FAO, 1976.
[4]	SYS C, VANRANST E, DEBAVEYE J. Land evaluation: Part I, principles in land evaluation and crop production calculation[M]. Brussels, Belgium: Agricultural Publications, 1991.
[5]	AKINCI H, ÖZALP A Y, TURGUT B. Agricultural land use suitability analysis using GIS and AHP technique[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2013, 97: 71-82. DOI URL
[6]	ZHANG J Q, SU Y R, WU J S, et al. GIS based land suitability assessment for tobacco production using AHP and fuzzy set in Shandong Province of China[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2015, 114: 202-211. DOI URL
[7]	张久权, 梁洪波, 董建新, 等. 基于GIS和模糊集理论的四川烤烟生态适应性评价[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2016, 37(3): 8-14.
	ZHANG J Q, LIANG H B, DONG J X, et al. Assessment on ecological adaptability of flue-cured tobacco in Sichuan Province based on GIS and fuzzy set[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2016, 37(3): 8-14.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	桑满杰, 卫海燕, 郭彦龙, 等. 基于模糊数学的秦岭地区山茱萸生境适宜性评价[J]. 植物科学学报, 2015, 33(6): 757-765.
	SANG M J, WEI H Y, GUO Y L, et al. Habitat suitability of Cornus officinalis in the Qinling region based on fuzzy mathematics[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2015, 33(6): 757-765.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	ARAGONÉS-BELTRÁN P, CHAPARRO-GONZÁLEZ F, PASTOR-FERRANDO J P, et al. An AHP (analytic hierarchy process)/ANP (analytic network process)-based multi-criteria decision approach for the selection of solar-thermal power plant investment projects[J]. Energy, 2014, 66: 222-238. DOI URL
[10]	ZABIHI H, AHMAD A, VOGELER I, et al. Land suitability procedure for sustainable citrus planning using the application of the analytical network process approach and GIS[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2015, 117: 114-126. DOI URL
[11]	DAS P T, TAJO L, GOSWAMI J. Assessment of citrus crop condition in umling block of Ri-BhoiDistrict using RS and GIS technique[J]. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2009, 37(2): 317-324. DOI URL
[12]	刘孜, 黄行凯, 徐宏林, 等. 湖北宜昌鸦鹊岭地区岩石-土壤元素迁移特征及柑橘种植适宜性评价[J]. 中国地质, 2020, 47(6): 1853-1868.
	LIU Z, HUANG X K, XU H L, et al. Migration characteristics of elements in the rock-soil system and suitability evaluation of orange planting in Yaqueling area, Yichang, Hubei Province[J]. Geology in China, 2020, 47(6): 1853-1868.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	潘同辉, 徐赐友, 李剑波. 通山县柑橘生产调查分析[J]. 合作经济与科技, 2009(21): 12-13.
	PAN T H, XU C Y, LI J B. Investigation and analysis of citrus production in Tongshan County[J]. Co-Operative Economy & Science, 2009(21): 12-13.(in Chinese)
[14]	ZADEH L A. Fuzzy sets[M]//Advances in fuzzy systems: applications and theory. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company, 1996: 394-432.
[15]	林正雨, 陈强, 邓良基, 等. 四川柑橘适宜分布及其对气候变化的响应研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(6): 845-859.
	LIN Z Y, CHEN Q, DENG L J, et al. Response of suitable distribution of citrus in Sichuan Province to climate change[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2019, 27(6): 845-859.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	刘东海, 乔艳, 谢和平, 等. 夷陵区柑橘园土壤和叶片养分状况研究[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2020(5): 237-242.
	LIU D H, QIAO Y, XIE H P, et al. Study on nutrient status of citrus orchard soils and leaves in Yiling[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2020(5): 237-242.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	MOKARRAM M, MIRSOLEIMANI A. Using fuzzy-AHP and order weight average (OWA) methods for land suitability determination for citrus cultivation in ArcGIS (case study: Fars Province, Iran)[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2018, 508: 506-518. DOI URL
[18]	鲁剑巍, 陈防, 王富华, 等. 湖北省柑橘园土壤养分分级研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2002, 8(4): 390-394.
	LU J W, CHEN F, WANG F H, et al. Study of classification of the soil nutrient status of citrusorchard in Hubei Province[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science, 2002, 8(4): 390-394.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	李有芳, 张超博, 易晓曈, 等. 云南玉溪柑橘园土壤养分状况与分布特征[J]. 土壤, 2020, 52(3): 487-493.
	LI Y F, ZHANG C B, YI X T, et al. Characteristics of soil nutrients and frequency distribution of Yuxicitrus orchards in Yunnan[J]. Soils, 2020, 52(3): 487-493.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	周利利, 段增强, 韩庆忠, 等. 秭归县柑橘园土壤肥力综合评价[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2019, 35(6): 1346-1353.
	ZHOU L L, DUAN Z Q, HAN Q Z, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of soil fertility in citrus orchards in Zigui County[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 35(6): 1346-1353.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	MALCZEWSKI J. GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview[J]. Progress in Planning, 2004, 62(1): 3-65. DOI URL
[22]	江思义, 王启耀, 李春玲, 等. 基于专家-层次分析法的地下空间适宜性评价[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2019, 15(5): 1290-1299.
	JIANG S Y, WANG Q Y, LI C L, et al. Evaluation suitability for the underground space using expert-analytic hierarchy process[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2019, 15(5): 1290-1299.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	向莉莉, 陈文德, 廖成云, 等. 基于模糊数学方法的川西南山区农田土壤肥力评价: 以田坝镇耕地土壤为例[J]. 河北科技师范学院学报, 2019, 33(2): 60-65.
	XIANG L L, CHEN W D, LIAO C Y, et al. Soil fertility evaluation of farmland soil in southwest mountain area of Sichuan based on fuzzy mathematics: taking the soil of cultivated land in Tianba Town as an example[J]. Journal of Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology, 2019, 33(2): 60-65.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	谢华东, 汪璇, 王占伟, 等. 基于GIS和模糊数学的重庆黔江烤烟气候适宜性评价[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2011, 17(5): 40-45.
	XIE H D, WANG X, WANG Z W, et al. GIS and fuzzy mathematics-based climatic suitability evaluation for tobacco cultivation in Qianjiang, Chongqing[J]. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2011, 17(5): 40-45.(in Chinese with English abstract)

样本属性 Sample attribute	有效样本数 Effective samples number	最小值 Minimum	最大值 Maximum	平均值 Average	中位数 Median	标准差 Standard deviation	偏度 Skewness	峰度 Kurtosis
有机质Organic matter/(g·kg^-1)	201	9.75	43.2	22.04	21.2	6.74	0.79	3.50
有效磷Available P/(mg·kg^-1)	192	4.8	112.8	21.66	14.5	18.57	2.12	8.22
速效钾Available K/(mg·kg^-1)	191	55	253	116.57	105.5	45.08	1.09	3.77
pH	200	4.37	7.68	6.27	6.17	0.64	0.18	2.47
土壤容重Soil bulk density/(g·cm^-3)	202	0.85	1.11	0.97	0.97	0.04	-0.12	2.81

样本属性 Sample attribute	有效样本数 Effective samples number	最小值 Minimum	最大值 Maximum	平均值 Average	中位数 Median	标准差 Standard deviation	偏度 Skewness	峰度 Kurtosis
有机质Organic matter/(g·kg^-1)	201	9.75	43.2	22.04	21.2	6.74	0.79	3.50
有效磷Available P/(mg·kg^-1)	192	4.8	112.8	21.66	14.5	18.57	2.12	8.22
速效钾Available K/(mg·kg^-1)	191	55	253	116.57	105.5	45.08	1.09	3.77
pH	200	4.37	7.68	6.27	6.17	0.64	0.18	2.47
土壤容重Soil bulk density/(g·cm^-3)	202	0.85	1.11	0.97	0.97	0.04	-0.12	2.81

目标层Target layer	准则层Criterion layer	指标层Index layer	权重Weight
土地适宜性Land suitability	气候Climate(0.214 3)	年平均温度Annual average temperature(0.333 3)	0.071 4
		年最低温度Annual minimum temperature(0.333 3)	0.071 4
		年降水量Annual precipitation(0.166 7)	0.035 7
		相对湿度Relative humidity(0.166 7)	0.035 7
	土壤理化性质	有机质Organic matter(0.447 7)	0.159 9
	Soil physical and chemical properties	有效磷Available P(0.191 0)	0.068 2
	(0.357 1)	速效钾Available K(0.191 0)	0.068 2
		pH(0.115 1)	0.041 1
		土壤容重Soil bulk density(0.055 2)	0.019 7
	地形Terrain(0.142 9)	海拔Elevation(0.573 6)	0.081 9
		坡度Slope(0.139 9)	0.020 0
		坡向Aspect(0.286 4)	0.040 9
	土质条件Soil condition(0.285 7)	质地构型Texture configuration(0.128 5)	0.036 7
		土壤类型Soil type(0.594 9)	0.170 0
		土壤质地Soil texture(0.276 6)	0.079 0

目标层Target layer	准则层Criterion layer	指标层Index layer	权重Weight
土地适宜性Land suitability	气候Climate(0.214 3)	年平均温度Annual average temperature(0.333 3)	0.071 4
		年最低温度Annual minimum temperature(0.333 3)	0.071 4
		年降水量Annual precipitation(0.166 7)	0.035 7
		相对湿度Relative humidity(0.166 7)	0.035 7
	土壤理化性质	有机质Organic matter(0.447 7)	0.159 9
	Soil physical and chemical properties	有效磷Available P(0.191 0)	0.068 2
	(0.357 1)	速效钾Available K(0.191 0)	0.068 2
		pH(0.115 1)	0.041 1
		土壤容重Soil bulk density(0.055 2)	0.019 7
	地形Terrain(0.142 9)	海拔Elevation(0.573 6)	0.081 9
		坡度Slope(0.139 9)	0.020 0
		坡向Aspect(0.286 4)	0.040 9
	土质条件Soil condition(0.285 7)	质地构型Texture configuration(0.128 5)	0.036 7
		土壤类型Soil type(0.594 9)	0.170 0
		土壤质地Soil texture(0.276 6)	0.079 0

指标 Index	隶属函数类型 Membership function type	下限 Lower limit	最佳下限 Optimal lower limit	最佳上限 Optimal upper limit	上限 Upper limit
年平均温度Annual average temperature/℃	S型Sigmoid	13	—	—	17
年最低温度Annual minimum temperature/℃	S型Sigmoid	-10	—	—	-4
年降水量Annual precipitation/mm	S型Sigmoid	1 600	—	—	2 000
相对湿度Relative humidity/%	倒S型Inverted sigmoid	75	—	—	80
有效磷Available P/(mg·kg^-1)	S型Sigmoid	10	—	—	30
速效钾Available K/(mg·kg^-1)	S型Sigmoid	50	—	—	180
有机质Organic matter/(g·kg^-1)	抛物线型Parabolic	15	25	35	45
pH值 pH value	抛物线型Parabolic	5.0	6.5	7.0	7.5
土壤容重Soil bulk density/(g·cm^-3)	抛物线型Parabolic	0.5	1.5	2.0	3.0
海拔Elevation/m	抛物线型Parabolic	60	150	800	1 600
坡度Slope/(°)	倒S型Inverted sigmoid	6	—	—	25

Land suitability evaluation of citrus cultivation based on fuzzy mathematics

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 24

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

指标 Index	类型 Type	隶属度 Membership	指标层 Index layer	类型 Type	隶属度 Membership
坡向Aspect	平面Flat	1.0	质地构型	薄层型Thin layer type	0.55
	北North	0.3	Texture configuration	松散型Loose type	0.30
	东北Northeast	0.4		紧实型Compacttype	0.75
	东East	0.5		夹层型Mezzaninetype	0.85
	东南Southeast	0.8		上紧下松型Compact top and loose bottom type	0.40
	南South	1.0		上松下紧型Loose top and compact bottom type	1.00
	西南Southwest	0.7		海绵型Sponge type	0.95
	西West	0.5	土壤类型Soil type	红壤性土Red soil	0.95
	西北Northwest	0.2		红色石灰土Red lime soil	0.60
土壤质地Soil texture	砂土Sand	0.60		棕红壤Brown-red soil	0.90
	砂壤Sandy soil	0.85		棕色石灰土Brown lime soil	0.55
	轻壤Light soil	0.90		中性紫色土Neutral purple soil	0.65
	中壤Middle soil	1.00		典型黄棕壤Typical yellow-brown soil	0.80
	重壤Heavy soil	0.95		石灰性紫色土Calcareous purple soil	0.50
	黏土Clay	0.70

指标Index	适宜性等级Suitability level	面积Area/km²	占比Proportion/%	SI
气候Climate	S1	1 403.73	57.96	[0.79,0.99)
	S2	231.54	9.56	[0.74,0.79)
	S3	309.49	12.78	[0.65,0.74)
	N	476.95	19.69	[0.10,0.65)
土壤理化性质	S1	453.76	18.74	[0.79,0.99)
Soil physical and chemical properties	S2	371.80	15.35	[0.74,0.79)
	S3	822.76	33.97	[0.65,0.74)
	N	773.38	31.94	[0.10,0.65)
地形Terrain	S1	747.08	30.85	[0.79,0.99)
	S2	313.10	12.93	[0.74,0.79)
	S3	640.28	26.44	[0.65,0.74)
	N	721.25	29.78	[0.10,0.65)
土质条件Soil condition	S1	1 650.07	68.14	[0.79,0.99)
	S2	448.78	18.53	[0.74,0.79)
	S3	120.69	4.98	[0.65,0.74)
	N	202.16	8.35	[0.10,0.65)
土地适宜性Land suitability	S1	652.37	26.94	[0.79,0.99)
	S2	795.51	32.85	[0.74,0.79)
	S3	560.42	23.14	[0.69,0.74)
	N	413.40	17.07	[0.10,0.69)

[1]	WEN Mingxia, ZHANG Shunchang, WU Shaohui, HU Lipeng, WANG Peng, HUANG Bei. Effect of protein hydrolysate-based amino-acid fertilizers on fruit quality of Hongmeiren citrus hybrid [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(3): 422-428.
[2]	MENG Youqing, WANG Enguo, CHEN Wujian, LI Yanmin, CHENG Fan, MENG Minxia. Distribution and growth dynamics of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus positive Asian citrus psyllid in Zhejiang Province [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(3): 464-469.
[3]	YANG Lei, ZHANG Yungui, YANG Haijian, LI Xunlan, HONG Lin. Characteristics of nutrients and leaf surface organisms under different citrus moss severities [J]. , 2020, 32(4): 632-643.
[4]	TANG Weimin, XING Jianrong, YANG Ying, XIANG Lu, WANG Sinong, LU Shengmin. Processing adaptability and storage characteristics of four whole fruit drinks of hybrid citrus [J]. , 2020, 32(3): 483-489.
[5]	LAI Jiahao, SONG Shuilin, LIU Bing. Effects of three endophytic bacteria with the characteristic of controlling citrus canker on the activity of several defensive enzymes in navel orange [J]. , 2020, 32(11): 1994-2000.
[6]	WANG Chengkuan, HUANG Zhendong, LIU Xingquan, HONG Xiaoling. Effects of meteorological factors on fruit quality of Hongmeiren citrus [J]. , 2020, 32(10): 1798-1808.
[7]	MENG Youqing, WANG Enguo, LI Yanmin, MING Ke, YUAN Yiwen. Study on spatial distribution pattern and parameter characteristics of PCR positive strains of Citrus Huanglongbing [J]. , 2019, 31(4): 579-587.
[8]	MENG Youqing, WENG Haiyong, CEN Haiyan, LI Hongye, HE Yong. Carbohydrate metabolism and near-infrared spectral characteristics in asymptomatic Huang-longbing infected leaves [J]. , 2019, 31(3): 428-435.
[9]	CAO Yan, FAN Ming, TONG Chuang, LU Shengmin, YANG Ying, XING Jianrong, ZHENG Meiyu, TANG Weimin, LIU Zhe. Improving soluble dietary fiber content of citrus peel and pomace by fermentation with mixed strains combined with two-stage temperature control [J]. , 2019, 31(3): 474-479.
[10]	ZHANG Xu, WANG Xiaojia, LI Sichen, DONG Tiantian, WANG Zhihui. Research progress of lignin biosynthesis and regulation during granulation of citrus [J]. , 2019, 31(12): 2131-2140.
[11]	XU Xiao, YANG Jinxiu. Change analysis of citrus total factor productivity in China [J]. , 2018, 30(3): 470-478.
[12]	YANG Ying, TANG Weimin, XING Jianrong, ZHENG Meiyu, LU Shengmin. Study on bacterial cellulose production from citrus dregs by intermittent shaking culture [J]. , 2018, 30(2): 307-313.
[13]	ZHOU Jinyun, WANG Chunmiao, ZHANG Jun. Color changes and its kinetics of canned citrus during storage [J]. , 2018, 30(2): 323-329.
[14]	FENG Fangfang, WEI Qingjiang, SU Shouting, NING Shaojun, LIAO Xiaona, GU Qingqing. Effect of drought on growth morphology, osmolyte content and antioxidant enzyme activity of two citrus seedlings [J]. , 2017, 29(9): 1515-1523.
[15]	QIU Xia, YE Shuang, XIONG Bo, LIAO Ling, SUN Guochao, RONG Yi, LUO Jinyu, DAI Lin, WANG Zhihui. Photosynthetic characteristics of 13 citrus cultivars [J]. , 2017, 29(6): 917-925.