Effects of different water treatments on growth and nutrient uptake of Actinidia valvata Dunn seedlings under substrate culture

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20221775

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (12): 2854-2864.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20221775

• Horticultural Science • Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of different water treatments on growth and nutrient uptake of Actinidia valvata Dunn seedlings under substrate culture

CHEN Dagang¹(), XU Kaiwei¹, PENG Dandan¹, YOU Haoyu¹, YANG Ran¹, LIAO Huiping², CHEN Yuanxue¹^,^*()

1. College of Resource, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
2. Sichuan Huasheng Agricultural Co., Ltd., Mianzhu 618200, Sichuan, China

Received:2022-12-10 Online:2023-12-25 Published:2023-12-27

Abstract

Abstract:

In this study, Actinidia valvata Dunn rootstock seedlings were used as test materials, combined with the suitable material ratio of early kiwifruit under substrate culture (coconut bran∶peat∶perlite=2∶4∶4, volume ratio), 6 different moisture treatments were set at 20% (SMC-20%), 40% (SMC-40%), 60% (SMC-60%), 80% (SMC-80%), 100% (SMC-100%), 120% (SMC-120%) of the saturated moisture content (SMC). In order to screen out the water management scheme suitable for Actinidia valvata Dunn seedlings under substrate culture. The results showed that the seedling height, stem diameter, chlorophyll relative content (SPAD) value, dry matter accumulation, root activity, total root length, total root surface area, total root volume, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium nutrient accumulation were all better under SMC-100% treatment. Compared with other treatments, they averagely increased by 99.83%, 149.08%, 16.43%, 264.30%, 72.81%, 227.53%, 194.99%, 156.72%, 395.88%, 374.85%, 342.72%, respectively. Seedling growth indicators performed poorly under SMC-20% and SMC-40% treatments and were severely reduced compared with SMC-100% treatment. The performance of seedling growth index under SMC-60% and SMC-80% treatment was slightly lower than that under SMC-100% treatment. Although excessive water (i.e. SMC-120% treatment) had little effect on root growth, excessive irrigation caused nutrient loss in the substrate, resulting in decreased nutrient absorption capacity of seedlings, and poor above-ground growth of the seedlings. These results indicated that the kiwifruit seedlings under SMC-100% treatment had a better effect, and could be used as a suitable water management scheme for the substrate culture of Actinidia valvata Dunn seedlings.

Key words: Actinidia valvata Dunn, substrate culture, water treatment, seedling growth, nutrient uptake

CLC Number:

S663.4

CHEN Dagang, XU Kaiwei, PENG Dandan, YOU Haoyu, YANG Ran, LIAO Huiping, CHEN Yuanxue. Effects of different water treatments on growth and nutrient uptake of Actinidia valvata Dunn seedlings under substrate culture[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(12): 2854-2864.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig.1 Effect of different water treatments on net growth of plant height and stem diameter of kiwifruit seedlings Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments (P<0.05). The same as below.

Fig.2 Effect of different water treatments on SPAD value of kiwifruit seedlings

Fig.3 Effects of different water treatments on dry matter accumulation (A), dry matter distribution ratio (B) and root shoot ratio (C) of kiwifruit seedlings

Fig.4 Effect of different water treatments on root activity of kiwifruit seedlings

Fig.5 Effects of different water treatments on total root length (A), total root surface area (B), total root volume (C) and average root diameter (D) of kiwifruit seedlings

Fig.6 Effect of different water treatments on root composition of kiwifruit seedlings

Fig.7 Effects of different water treatments on nitrogen (A), phosphorus (B) and potassium (C) content in various parts of kiwifruit seedlings

Fig.8 Effects of different water treatments on the accumulation of nitrogen(A), phosphorus(B) and potassium(C) nutrients in kiwifruit seedlings

References 44

[1]	BANO S, SCRIMGEOUR F. The export growth and revealed comparative advantage of the New Zealand kiwifruit industry[J]. International Business Research, 2012, 5(2): 73-82.
[2]	钟彩虹, 黄文俊, 李大卫, 等. 世界猕猴桃产业发展及鲜果贸易动态分析[J]. 中国果树, 2021(7): 101-108.
	ZHONG C H, HUANG W J, LI D W, et al. Dynamic analysis of global kiwifruit industry development and fresh fruit trade[J]. China Fruits, 2021(7): 101-108. (in Chinese)
[3]	齐秀娟, 郭丹丹, 王然, 等. 我国猕猴桃产业发展现状及对策建议[J]. 果树学报, 2020, 37(5): 754-763.
	QI X J, GUO D D, WANG R, et al. Development status and suggestions on Chinese kiwifruit industry[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2020, 37(5): 754-763. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	柴佳欣, 谢利华, 王健, 等. 秦巴山地猕猴桃种苗繁育技术[J]. 现代园艺, 2021, 44(11): 66-67.
	CHAI J X, XIE L H, WANG J, et al. Breeding techniques of kiwifruit seedlings in qinba mountain[J]. Contemporary Horticulture, 2021, 44(11): 66-67. (in Chinese)
[5]	徐世彦, 何若梦. 陕南地区猕猴桃育苗技术[J]. 山西果树, 2015(2): 44-45.
	XU S Y, HE R M. Seedling raising techniques of kiwifruit in southern Shaanxi[J]. Shanxi Fruits, 2015(2): 44-45. (in Chinese)
[6]	陈锦永, 方金豹, 齐秀娟, 等. 猕猴桃砧木研究进展[J]. 果树学报, 2015, 32(5): 959-968.
	CHEN J Y, FANG J B, QI X J, et al. Research progress on rootstock of kiwifruit[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2015, 32(5): 959-968. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	HELLER C R, NUNEZ G H. Preplant fertilization increases substrate microbial respiration but does not affect southern highbush blueberry establishment in a coconut coir-based substrate[J]. HortScience, 2022, 57(1): 17-21.
[8]	ŞIRIN U, ERTAN E, ERTAN B. Growth substrates and fig nursery tree production[J]. Scientia Agricola, 2010, 67(6): 633-638.
[9]	GJELOSHI G, THOMAI T, VRAPI H. Influence of supporter substrate on the rooting percentage of kiwifruit cuttings (Actinide Delicious cv. Hayward)[J]. International Refereed Journal of Engineering and Science, 2014, 3 (12): 10-14.
[10]	张效星, 樊毅, 崔宁博, 等. 不同灌水量对滴灌猕猴桃光合、产量与水分利用效率的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2019, 38(1): 1-7.
	ZHANG X X, FAN Y, CUI N B, et al. The effects of drip-irrigation amount on photosynthesis, yield and water use efficiency of kiwifruit[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2019, 38(1): 1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	甘雨康, 施浩然, 崔宁博, 等. 不同微灌方式下水分调控对猕猴桃光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2020, 39(4): 17-25.
	GAN Y K, SHI H R, CUI N B, et al. Effects of water regulation on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of kiwifruit leaves under different micro-irrigation methods[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2020, 39(4): 17-25. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	张静, 徐明, 雷靖, 等. 秦岭北麓不同水分处理对猕猴桃幼龄树生理特性的影响[J]. 农业与技术, 2022, 42(9): 1-5.
	ZHANG J, XU M, LEI J, et al. Effects of different water treatments on physiological characteristics of young kiwifruit trees in the northern foot of Qinling Mountains[J]. Agriculture and Technology, 2022, 42(9): 1-5. (in Chinese)
[13]	李霞, 解迎革, 薛绪掌, 等. 不同基质含水量下盆栽番茄蒸腾量、鲜物质积累量及果实产量的差异[J]. 园艺学报, 2010, 37(5): 805-810.
	LI X, XIE Y G, XUE X Z, et al. Difference of transpiration, fresh matter accumulation and fruit yield for potted tomato under moisture content of medium[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2010, 37(5): 805-810. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	周欢, 刘昌森, 周辰炎, 等. 作物根系活力检测方法改进与优化[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(9): 191-194.
	ZHOU H, LIU C S, ZHOU C Y, et al. Improvement and optimization of crop root vigor detection method[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(9): 191-194. (in Chinese)
[15]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[16]	崔桐灏, 周辉轩, 鲍荣粉, 等. 芸苔素内酯对树番茄幼苗生长及养分吸收的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2022, 40(6): 853-861.
	CUI T H, ZHOU H X, BAO R F, et al. Effects of brassinolide on the growth and nutrient absorption of Cyphomandra betacea seedlings[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2022, 40(6): 853-861. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	邓辉茗, 龙聪颖, 蔡仕珍, 等. 不同水分胁迫对绵毛水苏幼苗形态和生理特性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2018, 38(6): 1099-1108.
	DENG H M, LONG C Y, CAI S Z, et al. Morphology and physiological characteristics of Stachys lanata seedling under water stress[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2018, 38(6): 1099-1108. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	王佳岚, 李春杰. 不同水分梯度对碱茅农艺性状的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1584-1588.
	WANG J L, LI C J. Effect of different water gradients on agronomic characters of Puccinellia distans[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1584-1588. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	HUSSAIN M, MALIK M A, FAROOQ M, et al. Improving drought tolerance by exogenous application of glycinebetaine and salicylic acid in sunflower[J]. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2008, 194(3): 193-199.
[20]	张玉, 冷海楠, 曹宏杰, 等. 干旱胁迫对植物的影响研究[J]. 黑龙江科学, 2022, 13(14): 22-24, 47.
	ZHANG Y, LENG H N, CAO H J, et al. Study on the influence of drought stress on botany[J]. Heilongjiang Science, 2022, 13(14): 22-24, 47. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	马福林, 马玉花. 干旱胁迫对植物的影响及植物的响应机制[J]. 宁夏大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 43(4): 391-399.
	MA F L, MA Y H. Effect of drought stress on plants and their response mechanism[J]. Journal of Ningxia University(Natural Science Edition), 2022, 43(4): 391-399. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	陆日惠, 徐力兴, 周晓星, 等. 淹水胁迫对福建山樱花幼苗生长和光合特性的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2022, 44(4): 871-881.
	LU R H, XU L X, ZHOU X X, et al. Effects of flooding stress on growth and photosynthesis of Cerasus campanulate seedlings[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2022, 44(4): 871-881. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	张虎, 姜文龙, 武启飞, 等. 淹水胁迫对湖北海棠生长及光合作用的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2017, 45(12): 22-26.
	ZHANG H, JIANG W L, WU Q F, et al. Effects of waterlogging stress on the growth and photosynthesis of Malus hupehensis (Pamp) Rehd[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2017, 45(12): 22-26. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	唐洋, 温仲明, 王杨, 等. 土壤水分胁迫对刺槐幼苗生长、根叶性状和生物量分配的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019, 39(6): 98-105.
	TANG Y, WEN Z M, WANG Y, et al. Effects of soil water stress on growth, root and leaf traits, and biomass allocation of Robinia pseudoacacia seedlings[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 39(6): 98-105. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	倪天虹, 赵天宇, 张新叶, 等. 梓树对淹水胁迫的适应性研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2021, 43(3): 610-620.
	NI T H, ZHAO T Y, ZHANG X Y, et al. A study on the adaptability of Catalpa ovata to partial submergence stress[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2021, 43(3): 610-620. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	古咸彬, 薛莲, 陆玲鸿, 等. ‘浙猕砧1号’对长期淹水处理的响应特征[J]. 果树学报, 2019, 36(3): 327-337.
	GU X B, XUE L, LU L H, et al. Characteristics of the response of Actinidia polygama to long-term waterlogging stress[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2019, 36(3): 327-337. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	祖丽皮耶·托合提麦麦提, 徐敏, 亚里坤·努尔, 等. 不同干旱胁迫对黑果腺肋花楸幼苗生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 节水灌溉, 2022(7): 51-57.
	ZULIPIYE TUOHETIMAIMAITI, XU M, YALIKUN NUER, et al. Effects of different drought stress on seedling growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Aronia melanocarpa[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2022(7): 51-57. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	陈昱辛, 贾悦, 崔宁博, 等. 滴灌水肥一体化对柑橘叶片光合、产量及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2018, 37(S2): 50-58.
	CHEN Y X, JIA Y, CUI N B, et al. Effects of integrated management of water and fertilizer on citrus photosynthesis, yield and water use efficiency[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2018, 37(S2): 50-58. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	王方琳, 柴成武, 赵鹏, 等. 3种荒漠植物光合及叶绿素荧光对干旱胁迫的响应及抗旱性评价[J]. 西北植物学报, 2021, 41(10): 1755-1765.
	WANG F L, CHAI C W, ZHAO P, et al. Photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescence responses of three desert species to drought stress and evaluation of drought resistance[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2021, 41(10): 1755-1765. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	刘颖慧, 贾海坤, 高琼. 植物同化物分配及其模型研究综述[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(6): 1981-1992.
	LIU Y H, JIA H K, GAO Q. Review on researches of photoassimilates partitioning and its models[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(6): 1981-1992. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	高小锋, 王进鑫, 张波, 等. 不同生长期干旱胁迫对刺槐幼树干物质分配的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2010, 29(6): 1103-1108.
	GAO X F, WANG J X, ZHANG B, et al. Effects of drought stress on dry matter partitioning of young Robinia pseudoacacia at its different growth stages[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2010, 29(6): 1103-1108. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	李阳, 齐曼·尤努斯, 祝燕. 水分胁迫对大果沙枣光合特性及生物量分配的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2006, 26(12): 2493-2499.
	LI Y, QIMAN YUNUS, ZHU Y. Effects of water stress on photosynthetic characteristics and biomass partition of Elaeagnus moorcroftii[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2006, 26(12): 2493-2499. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	FARRISH K W. Spatial and temporal fine-root distribution in three Louisiana forest soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1991, 55(6): 1752-1757.
[34]	单立山, 李毅, 段雅楠, 等. 红砂幼苗根系形态特征和水分利用效率对土壤水分变化的响应[J]. 西北植物学报, 2014, 34(6): 1198-1205.
	SHAN L S, LI Y, DUAN Y N, et al. Response of root morphology and water use efficiency of Reaumuria soongorica to soil water change[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2014, 34(6): 1198-1205. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35]	郑淼, 郭毅, 王丽敏. 干旱胁迫对红宝石海棠根系形态及生理特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(3): 24-30.
	ZHENG M, GUO Y, WANG L M. Effect of drought stress on root morphology and physiological characteristics of Malus micromalus cv. ‘Ruby’[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(3): 24-30. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36]	黄海霞, 杨琦琦, 崔鹏, 等. 裸果木幼苗根系形态和生理特征对水分胁迫的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(1): 197-207.
	HUANG H X, YANG Q Q, CUI P, et al. Changes in morphological and physiological characteristics of Gymnocarpos przewalskii roots in response to water stress[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(1): 197-207. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37]	马廷臣, 余蓉蓉, 陈荣军, 等. PEG-6000模拟干旱对水稻幼苗期根系的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2010, 18(6): 1206-1211.
	MA T C, YU R R, CHEN R J, et al. Effect of drought stress simulated with PEG-6000 on root system in rice seedling[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2010, 18(6): 1206-1211. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[38]	张翠梅, 师尚礼, 吴芳. 干旱胁迫对不同抗旱性苜蓿品种根系生长及生理特性影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(5): 868-882.
	ZHANG C M, SHI S L, WU F. Effects of drought stress on root and physiological responses of different drought-tolerant alfalfa varieties[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(5): 868-882. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[39]	杨振亚, 周本智, 陈庆标, 等. 干旱对杉木幼苗根系构型及非结构性碳水化合物的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(18): 6729-6740.
	YANG Z Y, ZHOU B Z, CHEN Q B, et al. Effects of drought on root architecture and non-structural carbohydrate of Cunninghamia lanceolata[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(18): 6729-6740. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[40]	王晓雪, 李越, 张斌, 等. 干旱胁迫及复水对燕麦根系生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1588-1596.
	WANG X X, LI Y, ZHANG B, et al. Effects of drought stress and rehydration on root growth and physiological characteristics of oats[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1588-1596. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[41]	王琼, 张春雷, 李光明, 等. 渍水胁迫对油菜根系形态与生理活性的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2012, 34(2): 157-162.
	WANG Q, ZHANG C L, LI G M, et al. Influences of waterlogging stress on roots morphology and physiology for rapeseed[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2012, 34(2): 157-162. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[42]	ZOBEL R W. Sensitivity analysis of computer-based diameter measurement from digital images[J]. Crop Science, 2003, 43(2): 583-591.
[43]	范崇辉, 杨喜良. 秦美猕猴桃根系分布试验[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2003, 49(5): 13-14.
	FAN C H, YANG X L. Experiment on root distribution of kiwifruit Qinmei[J]. Shaanxi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2003, 49(5): 13-14. (in Chinese)
[44]	张琛, 张慧琴, 肖金平, 等. 三个品种猕猴桃实生苗的耐涝性比较[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2013, 25(5): 1007-1012.
	ZHANG C, ZHANG H Q, XIAO J P, et al. Comparison on seedling waterlogging tolerance of three cultivars of Actinidia chinensis Planch[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2013, 25(5): 1007-1012. (in Chinese with English abstract)

Effects of different water treatments on growth and nutrient uptake of Actinidia valvata Dunn seedlings under substrate culture

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 44

Related Articles 8

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	DONG Aiqin, LI Jianguo, YANG Tao, CHEN Yuanhua, XU Changxu, WAN Hui, PENG Zhiping, XIE Jie. Effects of different sulfate soaking agents on seed germination and cadmium uptake of rice seedlings [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(12): 2213-2223.
[2]	MA Ruifang, MA Jinchuan, MA Junwei, ZHOU Dayun, WANG Qiang, DING Chaohong. Growth dynamic and nutrient uptake law of common bean cultivar Liyun 2 [J]. , 2020, 32(1): 80-85.
[3]	LI Yongjie, YI Shilai, GAO Hengjin, ZHU Xiaoting, QIN Yu, JIN Guoqiang. Effects of different characteristic organic fertilizers on premature senescence tree's growth,quality,yield and nutrition status of top grafting Satsuma mandarin [J]. , 2019, 31(11): 1871-1879.
[4]	CHENG Binbin, XU Linjun, MA Guilian, LIU Chang'e. Trends analysis of wastewater treatment used by constructed wetlands based on Web of Science statistics [J]. , 2017, 29(6): 988-993.
[5]	ZHU Qiang，ZOU Meng\\|hui，AN Li，TIAN Zeng\\|yuan，GUO Yu\\|qi*. Allelopathy of aqueous extracts of six garden tree species on crops [J]. , 2014, 26(5): 1252-.
[6]	YANG Xia1， PEI Qingsong2， HE Shuiping3， LU Meidan1， JIA Huijuan1，*. Effects of substrate culture on vine growth and fruit quality in ‘Pione’ grape#br# [J]. , 2014, 26(4): 929-.
[7]	LIANG Qian-qian;BAI Shang-bin;*;ZHOU Guo-mo;WANG Yi-xiang;LIAO Juan. Effect of aqueous extracts of Phyllostachys heterocycla cv. Pubescens on seed germination and seedling growth of Festuca arundinacea [J]. , 2012, 24(3): 0-439.
[8]	ZOU Wen-wu;HU Mei-hua;WANG Bing-liang;ZHAO Pei-ou;LI Jing-feng;ZHAO Yong. Effect of commercial substrates on stock and grafted seedling growth in watermelon [J]. , 2010, 22(2): 0-187.