Research on promotion mechanism of “standard land” reform to high quality development of modern agriculture

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.03.22

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 688-697.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.03.22

• Agricultural Economy and Development • Previous Articles Next Articles

Research on promotion mechanism of “standard land” reform to high quality development of modern agriculture

ZHANG Yanbin¹(), GENG Bin²^,^*(), LIANG Ying³, XU Tiaojuan¹, XU Baogen², ZENG Xin², ZHANG Yueyue²

1. Land Consolidation and Rehabitation Center of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310007, China
2. Institute of Land and Urban Development, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China
3. School of Business Administration, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics Dongfang College, Jiaxing 314408, Zhejiang, China

Received:2021-12-06 Online:2023-03-25 Published:2023-04-07

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to achieve modern agriculture of high-quality development, governments implement a series of industrial policies to promote the willingness to modern agricultural industry development, and the “standard land” land supply policy plays an important role in regulating and guiding modern agriculture. Based on the survey data of “standard land” in 21 provincial modern agriculture industrial park of Zhejiang Province, this paper constructed the action mechanism of “standard land” policy on the high-quality development of modern agriculture, empirically analyzed the influencing factors of “standard land” policy on the attract of modern agricultural enterprises, and discussed the mechanism of “standard land” policy promoting the high-quality development of modern agriculture. The research showed that factors passed the independent sample T test. The results showed that there were significant differences among the factors affecting the willingness to modern agricultural enterprises development and the “standard land” policy had a strong attraction for the development of modern agriculture. The regression coefficients of standard land control index refinement cognition, standard land credit supervision construction, government service construction, standard land property rights management and crowding-out effect cognition were 1.43, 1.35, 1.28, 0.98, 0.94, respectively, indicating that these five factors had a significant impact on the willingness to modern agricultural enterprises development. For promoting modern agriculture of high-quality development, it is suggested to refine the reform of “standard land” policy by improving the control index system of “standard land”, establishing a unified and strict regional supervision system, maintaining market development order, simplifying approval procedures, establishing regional classification guidelines.

Key words: standard land, land supply model, modern agricultural industry, high quality development

CLC Number:

S-9
F301.24

ZHANG Yanbin, GENG Bin, LIANG Ying, XU Tiaojuan, XU Baogen, ZENG Xin, ZHANG Yueyue. Research on promotion mechanism of “standard land” reform to high quality development of modern agriculture[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(3): 688-697.

Figures/Tables 3

References 19

[1]	蒋黎, 蒋和平, 蒋辉. “十四五”时期推动国家现代农业产业园发展的新思路与新举措[J]. 改革, 2021(12): 106-115.
	JIANG L, JIANG H P, JIANG H. New ideas and measures to promote the development of national modern agricultural industrial park during the 14th five-year plan period[J]. Reform, 2021(12): 106-115. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	肖琴, 罗其友. 国家现代农业产业园建设现状、问题与对策[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2019, 40(11): 57-62.
	XIAO Q, LUO Q Y. Construction status, problems and countermeasures of national modern agricultural industrial park[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2019, 40(11): 57-62. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	王少杰, 王建强. 浙江:“标准地”模式助推节地及治理效能提升[J]. 中国土地, 2020(3): 55-56.
	WANG S J, WANG J Q. Zhejiang: “standard land” mode boosts land saving and governance efficiency[J]. China Land, 2020(3): 55-56. (in Chinese)
[4]	张发明, 丁峰, 王坪. 中国粮食主产区农业高质量发展水平评价与时空演变[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(1): 150-160. DOI
	ZHANG F M, DING F, WANG P. Evaluation of high-quality agricultural development level in major grain producing areas in China and its spatial and temporal evolution[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(1): 150-160. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
[5]	胡巧莲, 杨君, 邵劲松, 等. 田园综合体建设初期土地利用效益综合评价: 以鲁家村为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(8): 1485-1492. DOI
	HU Q L, YANG J, SHAO J S, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of land use benefit in early stage of pastoral complex construction: taking Lujia Village as an example[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2020, 32(8): 1485-1492. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
[6]	王丽英, 丁姝羽, 刘后平. 农村产业融合与农民收入增长: 基于空间效应与门槛效应的实证研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(4): 761-776. DOI
	WANG L Y, DING S Y, LIU H P. Impact of rural industrial convergence on farmers’ income growth: an empirical study based on spatial effect and threshold effect[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(4): 761-776. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
[7]	杨继东, 罗路宝. 产业政策、地区竞争与资源空间配置扭曲[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018(12): 5-22.
	YANG J D, LUO L B. Industrial policy, regional competition and distortion of resources spatial allocation[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2018(12): 5-22. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	王志锋, 朱中华, 黄志基. 土地政策的偏向性对我国区域间经济差距的影响研究[J]. 经济纵横, 2020(1): 74-83.
	WANG Z F, ZHU Z H, HUANG Z J. The impact of the bias of land policy on the economic gap across China’s regions[J]. Economic Review Journal, 2020(1): 74-83. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	唐宇娣, 朱道林, 程建, 等. 差别定价的产业用地供应策略对产业结构升级的影响: 基于中国277个城市的实证分析[J]. 资源科学, 2020, 42(3): 548-557. DOI
	TANG Y D, ZHU D L, CHENG J, et al. Impact of differential pricing strategy of land supply on the upgrading of industrial structure: a study based on the empirical analysis of 277 cities in China[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(3): 548-557. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	党丽娟, 杨波. 土地价格对产业结构优化升级的影响研究[J]. 中国经贸导刊(中), 2019(7): 12-16.
	DANG L J, YANG B. Study on the influence of land price on the optimization and upgrading of industrial structure[J]. China Economic & Trade Herald, 2019(7): 12-16. (in Chinese)
[11]	席强敏, 梅林. 工业用地价格、选择效应与工业效率[J]. 经济研究, 2019, 54(2): 102-118.
	XI Q M, MEI L. Industrial land price, selection effect and industrial efficiency[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2019, 54(2): 102-118. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	游和远, 吴次芳. 供地控制指标引导产业碳排放的效率分析[J]. 经济地理, 2014, 34(3): 136-141, 155.
	YOU H Y, WU C F. Efficiency estimation and implications of using land supply control indicators to guide industrial carbon emissions[J]. Economic Geography, 2014, 34(3): 136-141, 155. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	张俊峰, 张安录. 差别化土地管理理论解释及政策体系建设[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2018, 39(1): 10-16.
	ZHANG J F, ZHANG A L. Theoretical explanation and policy system construction of differentiated land management[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2018, 39(1): 10-16. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	SANTOSA B, SURJONO, RACHMANSYAH A, et al. Strategy development of western East Java, industrial area[J]. American Journal of Sociological Research, 2014, 4(2): 42-52.
[15]	XU M W, WANG T Y, WU Z W, et al. Store location selection via mining search query logs of Baidu maps[EB/OL]. [2021-12-06]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.03662
[16]	ZHENG X. Factors influencing location selection in inward foreign direct investment to China[J]. Journal of Applied Management and Investments, 2014, 3(1):41-51.
[17]	AVERCH H, JOHNSON L L. Behavior of the firm under regulatory constraint[J]. The American Economic Review, 1962, 52(5): 1052-1069.
[18]	王俊豪. A-J效应与自然垄断产业的价格管制模型[J]. 中国工业经济, 2001(10): 33-39.
	WANG J H. A-J effect and price regulation model of natural monopoly industry[J]. China Industrial Economy, 2001(10): 33-39. (in Chinese)
[19]	李峰. 自然垄断中的规制与有效竞争[D]. 上海: 复旦大学, 2005.
	LI F. Regulation and workable competition in natural monopoly[D]. Shanghai: Fudan University, 2005. (in Chinese with English abstract)

自变量序号 Independent variable number	调查问项 Survey questions	问项内容 Questions content	影响方向预测 Direction prediction
X₁	标准地信息渠道建设 Construction of standard land information channel	标准地信息渠道建设评价:较差=0 ;一般=1;良好=2 Evaluation of standard land information channel construction: Poor=0; General=1; Good=2	+
X₂	标准地用地标准设置 Standard land use standard setting	标准地用地标准设置评价:不完善=0;一般=1;完善=2 Evaluation of standard land use standard setting: Imperfection=0; General=1;Perfect=2	+
X₃	标准地信用监管建设 Standard credit supervision construction	标准地统一严格的区域监管对企业的吸引性评价: 不强=0;一般=1;强=2 Evaluation of unified and strict regional supervision on the attractive role of enterprises: Not strong=0;General=1;Strong=2	+
X₄	园区配套设施建设 Park supporting facilities construction	标准地园区配套设施建设评价:较差=0;一般=1;良好=2 Evaluation of standard land park supporting facilities construction: Poor=0; General=1; Good=2	+
X₅	政府服务建设 Government service construction	“最多跑一次”对企业发展的促进作用评价:无=0;一般=1;大=2 Evaluation of“running at most once”to promote the development of enterprises: No=0;General=1;Big=2	+
X₆	标准地政策认知 Standard policy cognition	标准地政策措施的了解程度:不了解=0;一般=1;了解=2 Understanding of standard local policies and measures: Don’t know=0;General=1;Understand=2	+
X₇	挤出效应认知 Crowding-out effect cognition	标准地政策措施的挤出效应评价:存在=0;不清楚=1;不存在=2 Evaluation of standard land policies’ crowding-out effect cognition: Yes=0;Unclear=1;No=2	-
X₈	标准地控制指标精细化认知 Standard land control index refinement cognition	标准地控制指标精细化程度评价:不精细=0;一般=1;精细=2 Evaluation of standard land control index refinement: No fine=0; General=1;Fine=2	+
X₉	标准地土地价格认知 Standard land price cognition	标准地土地价格评价:价格低=0;价格一般=1;价格高=2 Evaluation of standard land price: Low price=0;Normal price=1; High price=2	-
X₁₀	标准地奖励措施作用 Standard incentive measures function	标准地奖励措施对企业发展的促进作用评价: 无=0;一般=1;大=2 Evaluation of incentive measures to promote the development of enterprises:No=0;General=1;Big=2	+
X₁₁	标准地惩罚措施作用 Standard punitive measures function	标准地惩罚措施对企业发展的阻碍作用评价: 无=0;一般=1;大=2 Evaluation of hindering effect of punitive measures on enterprise development: No=0;General=1;Big=2	-
X₁₂	标准地土地产权管理 Standard land property rights management	标准地土地产权管理明晰性评价:明晰=0;不清楚=1;不明晰=2 Evaluation of clarification of standard land property rights management: Clear=0;Not clear=1;Unclear=2	+
X₁₃	标准地法律完善程度认知 Cognition of standard degree of legal perfection	标准地法律的完善程度评价:不完善=0;一般=1;完善=2 Evaluation of standard degree of legal perfection: Imperfection=0; General=1;Perfect=2	+
Y	现代农业企业落地意愿 The willingness to modern agricultural enterprises development	“标准地”改革背景下,现代农业企业落地意愿:愿意落地=0,不愿意落地=1 Under the background of“standard land”policy reform, the willingness to modern agricultural enterprises development: Willing to land=0, Unwilling to land=1

自变量序号 Independent variable number	调查问项 Survey questions	问项内容 Questions content	影响方向预测 Direction prediction
X₁	标准地信息渠道建设 Construction of standard land information channel	标准地信息渠道建设评价:较差=0 ;一般=1;良好=2 Evaluation of standard land information channel construction: Poor=0; General=1; Good=2	+
X₂	标准地用地标准设置 Standard land use standard setting	标准地用地标准设置评价:不完善=0;一般=1;完善=2 Evaluation of standard land use standard setting: Imperfection=0; General=1;Perfect=2	+
X₃	标准地信用监管建设 Standard credit supervision construction	标准地统一严格的区域监管对企业的吸引性评价: 不强=0;一般=1;强=2 Evaluation of unified and strict regional supervision on the attractive role of enterprises: Not strong=0;General=1;Strong=2	+
X₄	园区配套设施建设 Park supporting facilities construction	标准地园区配套设施建设评价:较差=0;一般=1;良好=2 Evaluation of standard land park supporting facilities construction: Poor=0; General=1; Good=2	+
X₅	政府服务建设 Government service construction	“最多跑一次”对企业发展的促进作用评价:无=0;一般=1;大=2 Evaluation of“running at most once”to promote the development of enterprises: No=0;General=1;Big=2	+
X₆	标准地政策认知 Standard policy cognition	标准地政策措施的了解程度:不了解=0;一般=1;了解=2 Understanding of standard local policies and measures: Don’t know=0;General=1;Understand=2	+
X₇	挤出效应认知 Crowding-out effect cognition	标准地政策措施的挤出效应评价:存在=0;不清楚=1;不存在=2 Evaluation of standard land policies’ crowding-out effect cognition: Yes=0;Unclear=1;No=2	-
X₈	标准地控制指标精细化认知 Standard land control index refinement cognition	标准地控制指标精细化程度评价:不精细=0;一般=1;精细=2 Evaluation of standard land control index refinement: No fine=0; General=1;Fine=2	+
X₉	标准地土地价格认知 Standard land price cognition	标准地土地价格评价:价格低=0;价格一般=1;价格高=2 Evaluation of standard land price: Low price=0;Normal price=1; High price=2	-
X₁₀	标准地奖励措施作用 Standard incentive measures function	标准地奖励措施对企业发展的促进作用评价: 无=0;一般=1;大=2 Evaluation of incentive measures to promote the development of enterprises:No=0;General=1;Big=2	+
X₁₁	标准地惩罚措施作用 Standard punitive measures function	标准地惩罚措施对企业发展的阻碍作用评价: 无=0;一般=1;大=2 Evaluation of hindering effect of punitive measures on enterprise development: No=0;General=1;Big=2	-
X₁₂	标准地土地产权管理 Standard land property rights management	标准地土地产权管理明晰性评价:明晰=0;不清楚=1;不明晰=2 Evaluation of clarification of standard land property rights management: Clear=0;Not clear=1;Unclear=2	+
X₁₃	标准地法律完善程度认知 Cognition of standard degree of legal perfection	标准地法律的完善程度评价:不完善=0;一般=1;完善=2 Evaluation of standard degree of legal perfection: Imperfection=0; General=1;Perfect=2	+
Y	现代农业企业落地意愿 The willingness to modern agricultural enterprises development	“标准地”改革背景下,现代农业企业落地意愿:愿意落地=0,不愿意落地=1 Under the background of“standard land”policy reform, the willingness to modern agricultural enterprises development: Willing to land=0, Unwilling to land=1

检验项目 Inspection items	平均值 Mean	标准差 Std.Deviation	最大值 Maximum	t	显著性 Sig.
X₁	0.85	0.788	1	5.073	<0.001
X₂	0.84	0.781	2	4.346	<0.001
X₃	1.35	0.683	2	4.582	<0.001
X₄	0.83	0.601	2	2.887	<0.001
X₅	1.28	0.742	2	7.380	<0.001
X₆	0.84	0.597	2	3.943	<0.001
X₇	0.94	0.634	2	4.270	<0.001
X₈	1.43	0.707	2	5.946	<0.001
X₉	0.62	0.642	2	1.928	<0.001
X₁₀	0.66	0.748	2	4.900	<0.001
X₁₁	0.91	0.859	2	6.055	<0.001
X₁₂	0.98	0.605	2	3.501	<0.001
X₁₃	0.69	0.587	2	4.174	<0.001

检验项目 Inspection items	平均值 Mean	标准差 Std.Deviation	最大值 Maximum	t	显著性 Sig.
X₁	0.85	0.788	1	5.073	<0.001
X₂	0.84	0.781	2	4.346	<0.001
X₃	1.35	0.683	2	4.582	<0.001
X₄	0.83	0.601	2	2.887	<0.001
X₅	1.28	0.742	2	7.380	<0.001
X₆	0.84	0.597	2	3.943	<0.001
X₇	0.94	0.634	2	4.270	<0.001
X₈	1.43	0.707	2	5.946	<0.001
X₉	0.62	0.642	2	1.928	<0.001
X₁₀	0.66	0.748	2	4.900	<0.001
X₁₁	0.91	0.859	2	6.055	<0.001
X₁₂	0.98	0.605	2	3.501	<0.001
X₁₃	0.69	0.587	2	4.174	<0.001

Research on promotion mechanism of “standard land” reform to high quality development of modern agriculture

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 3

References 19

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	WANG Ningke, ZHANG Rui, ZHANG Shengyong. Effects of mechanization service degree and farmland operation scale on maize production efficiency [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(3): 698-707.
[2]	WANG Pingping. How does land titling affect agricultural productivity: a differences-in-differences study based on China Household Finance Survey (CHFS) data [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(2): 455-467.
[3]	WANG Bo, CHEN Qiulin, WAN Jingjing. Space-time logic and breakthrough direction of China’s rural development in the new development stage [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(2): 468-476.
[4]	LUO Haiping, PAN Liuxin, HU Xueying, LIU Zuguang. Study on grain and ecological effects of arable land use change in major grain-producing areas in China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(1): 226-237.
[5]	LI Baozhi, ZHUO Ni, HUANG Hexiao, ZHU Qibiao. Impact of “26 counties” policy based on concept of green development on urban-rural income gap in Zhejiang Province, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(1): 238-248.
[6]	WEI Zheng, CAO Guangqiao. Does urbanization promote development of agricultural mechanization?: an empirical study based on county level panel data of China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(12): 2778-2788.
[7]	LIU Enling, LUO Xiaofeng, DU Sanxia, YAN Aqian, WANG Xiangli. Aging, planting purpose and rice farmers' chemical pesticide reduction [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(12): 2789-2799.
[8]	GAO Xueping, ZHANG Yuhan, ZHANG Mengling, LIAO Wenmei. Analysis of the impact of use of internet information technology on agricultural productivity: a case study of rice farmers in Jiangxi Province, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(12): 2809-2822.
[9]	LU Jingyi, XIANG Keheng. Research on driving factors and combination path configuration of rural cultural tourism entrepreneurship of “new farmers” [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(11): 2553-2566.
[10]	GAO Kang, HE Puming. Can agricultural insurance guarantee farmer’s income: study on insurance failure and effectiveness based on situational dependence [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(10): 2296-2309.
[11]	LIN Chai, YING Shanting, GU Xingguo. Inner logic and realization path of agricultural heritage systems protection and utilization to promote common prosperity: a case study of Zhejiang Province, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(10): 2310-2318.
[12]	YIN Xiyang, CHEN Yixuan, LI Dongmei, YU Xi. Evaluation and spatiotemporal evolution of agricultural supply quality in China in 2003-2019 [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(9): 2043-2054.
[13]	WAN Zhiqian, ZHOU Xianjie. Open license of variety rights: theoretical explanation, normative structure and operation guarantee [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(9): 2055-2065.
[14]	MAO Xiaohong, FU Linlin, ZHANG Liu, WANG Jin, MAO Xiaobao. Calculation and analysis of contribution rate of technological progress of agriculture in Zhejiang Province, China: based on stochastic frontier analysis [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(8): 1784-1795.
[15]	KE Fuyan, XU Zhiyuan, YANG Liangshan. Study on driving effects of agricultural science and technology investments on agricultural economic growth:based on the data of 60 counties in Zhejiang Province, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(7): 1537-1544.